Jan 06, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission

[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:03]

IT'S NOON, AND WE WILL NOW CALL THE FIRST MEETING OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR TWENTY TWENTY TWO TO ORDER.

GOT FIVE ITEMS. GO THROUGH THEM AS QUICKLY AND EFFICIENTLY AS WE CAN.

[1. Discussion and possible action on a recommendation for a waiver of Section 28-24.(g).(6) prohibiting submission of a rezoning application on property for which a denial of a rezoning request had occurred within the previous twelve (12) months.]

LINDSAY. THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. CAN YOU GUYS HEAR ME? YES . [INAUDIBLE] GET RIGHT INTO IT.

[INAUDIBLE] IN THE EVENT THAT SOMEBODY [INAUDIBLE] . WHAT THIS WAIVER DO IS [INAUDIBLE] THAT 12 MONTH PERIOD BE WAIVED.

[INAUDIBLE]. [INAUDIBLE] THERE SITUATION [INAUDIBLE] . DIDN'T SOUND LIKE IT'S ON.

OH OKAY. AND WE HAVE SOME MORE [INAUDIBLE].

I THINK YOU SORRY FOR THE WAIT. NO WORRIES OKAY. IS THIS WORKING NOW? [INAUDIBLE] WORKING.

OKAY, PERFECT. I'M FABRICIO ESQUIVEL, I'M WITH ESTUDIO ARCHITECTURE.

LAURA WAS HERE.

OKAY. SO, WE DO HAVE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY HERE, LAURA AND AVI.

THEY'RE FROM URBAN MERIDIAN GROUP, SO THEY'LL BE IN HERE IN A SECOND.

SO, THE WAIVER AGAIN IS TO REQUEST FOR THAT VARIANCE, TO BE REMOVED, TO BE ABLE TO SHOW YOU GUYS THE CHANGES AND EVERYTHING POSSIBLE THAT WE'RE PREPARING TO DO FOR THE CITY WITH THE SKATEPARK AND EVERYTHING ELSE WE'RE-- WOULD LOVE TO DO FOR THE CITY.

THE PROJECT ITSELF IS LOCATED OFF WEST MULBERRY, JUST PRETTY MUCH WEST OF THE SCHOOL, RIGHT NEXT TO THE SCHOOL.

IT'S A TWO HUNDRED AND EIGHTY UNIT COMPLEX, WITH 70 TOWNHOMES IN THE BACK, AND THE FRONT TWO SITES-- IS THERE AND WE SCROLLED THROUGH IT AT ALL OR? SO, THE TWO SITES ON THE FRONT ARE GOING TO BE COMMERCIAL BASED, SMALL RETAIL CENTER AND THE OTHER [INAUDIBLE] SITE COULD BE FAST FOOD OR COFFEE OR WHATEVER FITS THE NEIGHBORHOOD

[00:05:01]

AS PART OF THIS RIGHT BEHIND THE COMMERCIAL, WE'RE DEDICATING THE SPOT FOR A SKATE PARK.

THE SKATE PARK IS AROUND THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND SQUARE FEET, SO IT'S A GOOD SIZED PARK, SO THE LANDLORD IS WILLING TO DO THAT ON TOP OF PAYING THE ONE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS FEE THAT YOU NEED FOR THE PARKS.

SO, THE COMPLEX ITSELF, IT'S PRETTY MUCH A-GRADE PRODUCT, AS YOU CAN SEE THESE RENDERINGS THAT YOU SEE HERE, NOT THE RETAIL.

THE RETAIL IS JUST A FILLER, BUT EVERYTHING IN THE BACK, THE APARTMENT, IF WE CAN SCROLL TO ANOTHER SHOT.

SO THIS IS LIKE THE AMENITY SECTION, SO IT-- POOLS, DOG PARKS, GARAGES.

I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF AMENITIES, GYMS, OFFICE SPACE THAT GO INTO A COMPLEX LIKE THIS.

THIS IS THE ACTUAL DESIGN.

THIS IS NOT JUST SOMETHING THAT WE DID FOR THIS MEETING, BUT THIS IS THE ACTUAL DESIGN OF THE PRODUCT. SO WE WANT TO SHOW YOU THAT IT IS A VERY NICE PRODUCT.

AS PART OF THIS AS WELL-- JOSE CAN YOU EXPLAIN HOW WE'RE GOING TO PRESENT MOVING FORWARD ? HELLO, JOSE GUERRERO, WITH ESTUDIO ARCHITECTURE.

PART OF THE OUTCOME OF OUR FIRST RUN AT THE ZONING CHANGE WAS WE WERE ABLE TO IDENTIFY THAT THE CITY WOULD LIKE A LITTLE BIT MORE INPUT AND A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION INTO THE PROJECT GOING IN.

OUR INITIAL INTENTION WAS TO SUBMIT FOR JUST A SIMPLE ZONING CHANGE, BUT OUR HOPE IS TO BE ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD AND SUBMIT AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UNIT.

WITH THAT, WE WILL BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT MORE INFORMATION UP FRONT AS TO THE PROPERTY AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE, AND IT WILL ALSO ALLOW THE CITY A LITTLE BIT MORE INPUT AND CONTROL INTO WHAT THE OUTCOME OF THE PROJECT IS GOING TO BE.

ALRIGHT, VERY GOOD. ANYTHING ELSE? THAT'S IT, SIR. ALRIGHT, SO AM I CLEAR ON THAT THE INTENT OF THE SKATE PARK IS FOR IT TO BE A PUBLIC VENUE AND NOT PRIVATE TO THE RESIDENTS OF THE COMPLEX? YES, THAT'S CORRECT. MY UNDERSTANDING OF THIS PROJECT IS THAT ONCE COMPLETED, THEY INTEND TO CONVEY ALL OF THAT TO THE CITY FOR PUBLIC USE.

ALRIGHT. ANYTHING ELSE LINDSAY? YES SIR, I'D LIKE TO JUST HIGHLIGHT THAT THIS IS SIMPLY A REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF THE 12 MONTH WAITING PERIOD.

THERE IS A LOT OF DUE DILIGENCE ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT GOING FORWARD.

THE TRAFFIC STUDIES AND ALL THAT.

SO THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WILL COME IN TIME, BUT THIS IS, IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT CONCEPTUALLY, THIS IS LIKE STEP NEGATIVE ONE.

SO, THIS IS JUST THE PRECURSOR TO STEP ONE.

ALRIGHT. VERY GOOD.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MR. CHAIRMAN, I WILL MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE WAIVER REQUEST AND I'M BONNIE MCDANIEL. ALRIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION FROM MS. MCDANIEL.

AND ELLEN WILL SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND FROM MS. EBY, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE WAIVER RESPOND BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT.

YOU'RE ON YOUR WAY. GOOD LUCK.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. ITEM TWO, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT

[2. Discussion and possible action on the revised preliminary plat and variances for the Mulberry Fields subdivision The subject property is currently undeveloped and is located on the north side of State Highway 35 (West Mulberry) and consists of 13.0044 acres. The proposed subdivision is within the Single Family Residential 6.3 (SF-6.3) zoning district.]

SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 35, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS WEST MULBERRY, AND CONSIST OF 13.0044 ACRES.

THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS WITHIN THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT.

LINDSAY. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. SO, YOU GUYS HAVE SEEN THIS ONE BEFORE.

THIS ONE ALSO WENT TO COUNCIL.

AS YOU MAY RECALL, THE ISSUE WAS PREDOMINANTLY THAT THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY WAS NOT 60 FOOT, SO IT WAS DENIED THEY HAVE GONE BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND REMEDIED THAT IN THEIR DESIGN. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE LOTS DON'T MEET THE 100 FOOT DEPTH REQUIREMENT, SO THERE ARE VARIANCES EMBEDDED WITH THIS FOR THEIR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION.

THE DEVELOPER IS HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

WITH THE WAIVERS? WITH THE WAIVERS, YES, SIR.

ALRIGHT, I DO HAVE ONE REQUEST TO SPEAK TO PLANNING AND ZONING FROM MR. SHAEFER. WELL, WE'VE DISCUSSED THIS SEVERAL TIMES, AND WE ARE AN AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNER ADJACENT TO THIS, AND WE NOTICED THERE ARE STILL SOME UNRESOLVED ISSUES.

ONE AND THE MOST IMPORTANT PROBABLY IS THAT THERE IS A 20 FOOT TEXAS NEW MEXICO HIGH

[00:10:03]

AND THEY SHOW CONSTRUCTION RIGHT UNDERNEATH THIS EASEMENT, WHICH IS A VIOLATION OF MANY, MANY PROBLEMS. THIS EASEMENT IS A 20 FOOT EASEMENT AND IT NEEDS TO BE PUT.

IT WAS IN THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND NOW IT'S BEEN DROPPED OUT.

I HAVE A COPY OF IT RIGHT HERE, WHICH I'LL BE HAPPY TO SHARE WITH YOU.

THE SECOND PROBLEM IS, OF COURSE, WETLANDS.

WE'VE DISCUSSED THAT AGAIN AND AGAIN.

WE TALKED ABOUT IT WITH THE GAMBIT PROJECT, AND IT WAS SHOWN ON THE GAMBIT PROJECT DRAWINGS. THERE'S NOTHING SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS UNDER WETLANDS WHATSOEVER.

THEY HAVEN'T DISAPPEARED.

SO, I THINK THOSE TWO ITEMS NEED TO BE LOOKED INTO AND ADDRESSED BOTH WETLANDS AND ESPECIALLY THE TEXAS NEW MEXICO RIGHT OF WAY.

I DO HAVE A COPY OF THE GAMBIT PROJECT RIGHT HERE, WHICH SHOWS THE WETLANDS, AND I HAVE A COPY OF THE TEXAS NEW MEXICO, WHICH I WILL HAND TO YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. SHAEFER. IS THAT ALL? THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

OK. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I DO ON THE EASEMENT.

I DID A LOT OF RESEARCH ON IT.

I'M RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO IT.

WE HAVE A GROUND EASEMENT OF 10 FOOT, BUT THE AERIAL EASEMENT ABOVE THAT GROUND EASEMENT IS 20 FEET WIDE.

SO THAT MEANS HE CANNOT BUILD ANYTHING, THERE CAN'T BE TREES, THERE CAN'T BE BUILDINGS, THERE CAN'T BE ANYTHING 20 FEET WIDE AROUND THOSE POWER LINES BECAUSE THAT FEEDS EVERYTHING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN.

IT FEEDS TWO CELLULAR TOWERS, IT FEEDS THE SCHOOL, IT FEEDS, IN FACT, TWO SCHOOLS, AND IF ANYTHING HAPPENED AND TEXAS NEW MEXICO NEEDED TO GET IN THERE, HE HAS TO HAVE A RIGHT OF WAY TO ALLOW THEM TO GO IN AND FIX THOSE POWER LINES.

BEFORE WE GO ANY FURTHER.

DO YOU HAVE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH THIS ITEM? SOUNDS LIKE [INAUDIBLE].

I DO, SO I WON'T BE VOTING.

OK, SO I THINK THAT PROBABLY I MEAN, YOU CAN SHARE INFORMATION AS YOUR HUSBAND HAS.

RIGHT. BUT I DON'T THINK YOU CAN I'M NOT GOING TO VOTE. OK, JUST TO BE CLEAR, YEAH.

SO LINDSEY, DOES THE CITY HAVE A RESPONSE TO THESE CONCERNS [INAUDIBLE] BEEN RAISED? YES, THESE CONCERNS ARE VALID.

HOWEVER, TEXAS NEW MEXICO HAS BEEN A GOOD PARTNER WITH THE CITY WHEN WE'VE ENCOUNTERED SIMILAR ISSUES, AERIAL EASEMENTS OR WHAT I'VE HEARD, AND THEY CAN EASILY GO UNDERGROUND WITH UTILITIES AND DO UNDERGROUND EASEMENTS, WHICH, YES, WOULD IMPACT FUTURE LOTS.

BUT THAT'S WHERE A LITTLE BIT-- THAT'S A PRELIMINARY-- WE'RE JUST IN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT RIGHT NOW. WE'RE NOT REALLY THAT FAR ALONG IN THE PROJECT.

SO, THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION HAS NOT CHANGED? THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION DOES NOT CHANGE, THE CITY'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE WITH THE VARIANCES. [INAUDIBLE].

QUESTIONS? [INAUDIBLE] MAKE A MOTION. I MOVE WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE MULBERRY FIELDS REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CORRECTION OF COMMENTS PROVIDED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEER PRIOR TO THE RECEIPT OF THE FINAL PLAT APPLICATION.

SECOND. I HAVE PURCHASED BY MR. MUNSON AND HIS SECOND BY MS. SPOOR. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

AYE.

ONE AND THEN YOU'RE ABSTAINING.

OK, SO IT'S. FIVE, ONE, AND ONE.

ALRIGHT. THAT WILL MOVE ON TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU. ITEM THREE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FINAL REPLAY OF THE SECOND

[3. Discussion and possible action on the Final Replat of the second phase of the Kiber Reserve Subdivision. The subject property is 7.956 acres and is shown to have forty-five lots on three blocks located to the north of East Kiber Street, to the west of South Downing Road, and south of East Orange Street. The property is currently in a Planned Development Overlay District.]

[00:15:02]

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ONE IS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

THIS IS THE SECOND PHASE AND THE FINAL PLOT FOR KIBER RESERVE.

IT'S A TWO PHASE PROJECT.

THE FIRST PHASE WAS COMPLETED AT THE END OF THE SUMMER AND THERE IS A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE CITY DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL.

THERE ARE NO SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS OR VARIANCES WITH THIS ONE.

QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? MR. CHAIRMAN. BONNIE.

I MOVE WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE KIBER RESERVE PHASE TWO FINAL REPLAT AND PLANS.

I SECOND IT. OK, I HAVE A MOTION FOR MS. MCDANIEL AND A SECOND FOR MS. SHAEFER, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I'LL JUST COMMENT THAT I SEE THAT [COUGH] AGAIN, THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT A LOT OF LOTS BELOW 60 FEET, SOME FORTY FIVE, SOME 50 AND WE'VE NEVER REALLY BEEN ENAMORED WITH THESE SMALL LOTS.

SO NOTED. ANYTHING ELSE? WELL, WE PROBABLY OUGHT TO DO THIS ONE BY SHOW OF HANDS.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL REPLAT INDICATE SO BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ONE, TWO THREE, FOUR.

OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

ONE, TWO, THREE. OK.

FOUR TO THREE. ALRIGHT.

[4. Discussion and possible actionion on the Final Replat for the Century Coale Road Business Park. The subject property is located on the north side of CR 220 approximately 500 feet west of S. Velasco Street (Bus. 288). The property consists of 9.273 acres and is in the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.]

OTHERWISE KNOWN AS BUSINESS 288, THE PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 9.273 ACRES AND [INAUDIBLE] THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

LINDSAY. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. THIS ONE ALSO IS VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

I BELIEVE IT CAME TO COUNCIL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL ON AUGUST 24TH.

IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY.

IT DID PASS AND THIS IS THE FINAL REPLAT AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.

OK. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THEN WE'LL MAKE A MOTION? NOW, MR. CHAIR, I WILL MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL REPLAT OF THE CENTURY COALE ROAD BUSINESS PARK.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MS. MCDANIEL IS A SECOND? SECOND. SECOND BY MS. SHAEFER. THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

THE MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

[5. Discussion and possible action on Heritage Park Section Three Preliminary Plat and variances to Sections 23-11(I) and 23-25(B) of the City's Land Development Code. The subject property is an approximate 11-acre tract of land proposed to have thirty lots, located in the T.S. Lee Survey, Abstract No. 318 in Brazoria County, Texas north of Henderson Road and west of Heritage Park Drive and belonging to the Single Family Residential 7.2 (SF-7.2) zoning district.]

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS AN APPROXIMATE 11 ACRE TRACT OF LAND PROPOSED TO HAVE 30 LOTS LOCATED IN THE T.S.

LEE SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 318 IN BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS, NORTH OF HENDERSON ROAD AND WEST OF HERITAGE PARK DRIVE, AND BELONGING TO THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7.2 ZONING DISTRICT. LINDSAY.

THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. SO, HERITAGE PARK SECTION THREE, OF COURSE, THIS IS THE THIRD PHASE OF HERITAGE PARK OFF OF HERITAGE PARK DRIVE NORTH OF HENDERSON ROAD.

A COUPLE ISSUES WITH THIS ONE.

NOT NECESSARILY A HARDSHIP IMPOSED BY THE DEVELOPER WHO IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY.

BUT THIS IS A SINGLE ENTRANCE AND EXIT DEVELOPMENT.

FOR ANY DEVELOPMENTS, 30, I BELIEVE 30 LOTS IS THE THRESHOLD THAT TRIGGERS THE NEED FOR A SECONDARY ACCESS.

IT'S NOT POSSIBLE WITH THIS ONE BECAUSE THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH BELONGS TO ANGLETON ISD, AND IT'S NOT FEASIBLE THAT, THAT PROPERTY WILL BE ACQUIRED BY THE DEVELOPER AND A ROAD BUILT ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

THERE'S JUST TOO MUCH OF A CONFLICT OF PROPERTY OWNERSHIP THERE.

SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE DO RECOMMEND TO APPROVE WITH THE VARIANCE ALLOWING FOR THE SINGLE ENTRANCE.

IT IS A BOULEVARD STYLE ENTRANCE.

I WILL POINT THAT OUT.

HOWEVER, THE OTHER EXCEPTION REQUESTED HERE PERTAINS TO A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS.

[00:20:02]

A TRAFFIC STUDY MAY BE DOABLE, BUT THE ISSUE HERE IS THAT THERE IS A HENDERSON ROAD STUDY GOING ON TO REVISE THAT CORRIDOR AND BRING IT, YOU KNOW, TO BE A MORE TRAVELED AREA.

SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE DO FEEL THAT SOME DEGREE OF TRAFFIC STUDY IS NECESSARY.

THERE WILL BE A TOTAL OF, I BELIEVE, 89 HOMES BETWEEN THE THREE SECTIONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE CITY OR THE DEVELOPER OR ANYONE ELSE? I JUST HAVE A CLARIFICATION, IF THERE'S 89 HOMES THAT ONE ENTRY IS FOR ALL EIGHTY NINE HOMES? YES, MA'AM. OK.

CLINT, YOU'RE DEVELOPING [INAUDIBLE] ANGLIA GOING TO BUILD-- ARE YOU SELLING THE LOST INDIVIDUAL BUILDERS OR IS IT GOING TO BE-- OK. OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE A MAYBE A SILLY QUESTION, AND I GUESS IT HAS TO DO WITH CONSTRUCTION, BUT UNDER THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MOTION, NUMBER TWO, CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR SECTION THREE SHOW A TEMPORARY TURNAROUND AT THE END OF ELM COURT.

CAN WE HAVE SOME EXPLANATION OF WHAT THAT'S ABOUT? I'M GOING TO DEFER THAT ONE TO JOHN PETERSON WITH HDR ENGINEERING.

THANK YOU, JOHN. SORRY TO CATCH YOU OFF GUARD.

[LAUGHTER].

[INAUDIBLE]. S,O THIS IS MIGUEL WITH BAKER AND LAWSON, HE CAN EXPLAIN.

OKAY. YEAH, I THINK THERE WAS A BIT OF CONFUSION.

WE DID SUBMIT A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THIS PLAT BECAUSE WE WANTED TO GET OVER THE HUMP OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST.

THERE IS A CUL DE SAC AT THE END OF ELM STREET ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT THAT'S GOING TO BE A PERMANENT CUL DE SAC OR CORRECT. WE HAVE HOUSES AROUND THE WHOLE CUL DE SAC, SO THERE'S NO ENTRY OR, YOU KNOW, THAT'S GOING TO BE PUT THERE FOR THE NEXT EXPANSION OR-- THE ONLY PLACE EXPANSION IS WHEN YOU COME IN, RIGHT? YOU'RE [INAUDIBLE]--.

CORRECT ON HARRY.

WE'RE LEAVING-- PROPOSING A STUB OUT AT THE END OF HERITAGE COURT, AND THERE'S NO HOUSES BEING PROPOSED ON THAT STUB OUT, SO THERE WOULDN'T BE A NEED FOR A TURNAROUND THERE AT THE MOMENT. THERE'S ONLY ONE WAY IN, ONE WAY OUT, THERE NEEDS TO BE TWO? YES. [INAUDIBLE].

I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION, HOW WIDE ARE THESE STREETS, ARE WE LOOKING AT HAVING CARS PARKED ON BOTH SIDES OF THE STREET AND THEN, YOU KNOW, IT BECOMING A CHALLENGE FOR EMERGENCY PERSONNEL TO GET IN THERE? OR JUST THE RESIDENTS FOR ELM STREET, WE ARE PROPOSING THE SAME STYLE OF STREET THAT'S ON THE BLUE BONNET ON, YOU KNOW, FOR HERITAGE PARKS SECTIONS ONE AND TWO.

WE'RE MATCHING-- CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD? CORRECT. AND WE'RE MATCHING THE EXISTING CROSS SECTION FOR HERITAGE COURT, THE ROAD THAT'S THE SHARED ROADWAY FOR ALL THE SECTIONS.

[INAUDIBLE] RESTRICTIONS ON NEIGHBORHOOD PARKING [INAUDIBLE].

GOOD. ANYTHING ELSE? TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THAT STREET HAS A 60 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY, SO THAT HAS-- THAT SHOWS IT RIGHT THERE. THANK YOU, LINSEY.

[INAUDIBLE] THE CONCERN FOR THE EMERGENCY ACCESS IN THE SINGLE ENTRY.

YEAH. THE TURN RADII OF THAT CUL DE SAC MEETS EMERGENCY SERVICE VEHICLE NEEDS.

IN ADDITION, I BELIEVE THESE HOMES ARE ALL SUPPOSED TO HAVE TWO CAR GARAGES, SO EACH EACH HOME WILL HAVE A TWO CAR DRIVEWAY.

FROM THE BOULEVARD ENTRANCE, BASICALLY, IT CAN TAKE DOUBLE TRAFFIC? CORRECT. [INAUDIBLE].

[00:25:11]

I MOVE WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE HERITAGE PARK, SECTION THREE PRELIMINARY PLAT AND THE VARIANCE OF SECTION 23-11 SUBJECT TO THE CITY ENGINEER COMMENTS BEING CLEARED.

CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR SECTION THREE SHOW A TEMPORARY TURNAROUND, WHICH MAYBE THAT'S BEEN ADDRESSED. THE DETENTION RESERVE IS NOTED AS SERVING ALL THREE SECTIONS, AND A TIA OR TRAFFIC STUDY IS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY ENGINEER PRIOR TO ANY FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR SECTION THREE.

THANK YOU, MR. MUNSON. SECOND.

A SECOND BY MS. SPOOR, IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE [INAUDIBLE] THIS MOTION YOU'RE APPROVING THE VARIANCE THAT WOULD JUST BE ONE ENTRANCE OR IS THAT PART OF IT? YES. JUST WANTED TO MAKE CLEAR [INAUDIBLE] ON THAT [INAUDIBLE].

AND DISCUSSION PART, THERE IS CONCERN ABOUT THE ONE ENTRANCE, YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN THROUGH THAT FOR DECADES.

BUT I WILL POINT OUT THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT 30 LOTS ON 11 ACRES AS OPPOSED TO ITEM THREE, FORTY FIVE LOTS ON SEVEN POINT NINE ACRES, SO I MEAN.

I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE ONE ENTRANCE.

BUT I FEEL LIKE THIS IS MORE ALONG THE LINES OF THE KIND OF SUBDIVISION WE'D LIKE TO SEE . 70 FOOT WIDE LOTS.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION BEFORE WE VOTE? HEARING NONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

ALRIGHT, THAT WILL CONCLUDE OUR REGULAR AGENDA.

WE WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AND FOR THOSE THAT ARE INTERESTED IN--

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.