>> [NOISE] WE WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AND I ALWAYS HAVE THE AGENDA IN FRONT OF ME. [DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER] [00:00:09] >> MINUTES. >> APPROVED? DOES EVERYBODY HAVE A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES? [1. Discussion and possible action on the review and approval of minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on May 05, 2022.] >> I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE MAY 5TH, 2022 MEETING. >> I SECOND [OVERLAPPING]. >> TO APPROVE AND TO SECOND. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NO ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. >> WE'RE JUST GOING TO SAY, YOU GOT THE MOTION THE SECOND. >> NO. >> MR. MATSON [INAUDIBLE]. >> YOU CAN TAKE A PICTURE. [NOISE]. >> MAYBE. [LAUGHTER]. >> GO UP. >> OH, WE GO UP. THERE IT IS I FOUND IT. OUR SECOND ITEM IS CONDUCT [2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance amending Section 23-98 Public Improvement Acceptance of Chapter 23 Land Development Code, of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Angleton, Texas.] A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23-98, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ACCEPTANCE OF CHAPTER 23 LANDED ON THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ANGLES IN TEXAS. WALT TAKE AWAY [NOISE]. >> I'LL TRY AND BE REALLY BRIEF TOO. >> WE'RE IN NO HURRY [LAUGHTER]. >> THIS IS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 23,98 REGARDING THE ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. APPARENTLY BEFORE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WAS ADOPTED, THE PROCESS WAS JUST A FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CHANGE THAT PROCESS TO PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT WAS DONE BY THE STAFF AND WITH A ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND. THEN AT THE END OF THAT ONE-YEAR PERIOD, FINAL ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AFTER IN BOTH CASES RECOMMENDATION BY THE CITY ENGINEER THAT EVERYTHING WAS OKAY. THEN THERE WOULD BE ANOTHER ONE YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND PERIOD. THE CITY HAS BEEN, AND BY THE CITY I MEAN THE STAFF HAS BEEN PROCESSING ACCEPTANCES FOR ABOUT A YEAR NOW WITH A WAIVER OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE SO IT JUST WENT STRAIGHT TO THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. COUNCIL FINALLY SAID, WE WOULD RATHER THAT YOU JUST AMEND THE CODE THEN DO IT THIS WAY SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING WE'RE AMENDING THE CODE [NOISE] SO IT BECOMES SIMPLY A FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. THERE'S NO PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE. THE CURRENT PROCESS REQUIRES A ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND. THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE IS DONE BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE BOND AMOUNT IS EITHER $25,000 DOLLARS OR 20 PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST, WHICHEVER IS HIGHER. BASED ON THE CITY COUNCIL INSTRUCTION. THIS ORDINANCE HAS, AGAIN A ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND. THE MAINTENANCE BOND AMOUNT IS 100 PERCENT OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST AND THE ACCEPTANCE IS GOING TO BE DONE ADMINISTRATIVELY BY THE STAFF SO THAT COUNCIL AGENDAS DON'T HAVE THESE THINGS ON THEM AND THEY DON'T HAVE TO SPEND ANY TIME DOING THAT. THAT'S WHAT WENT OUT OF THE PACKET IT WAS A DRAFT OF THAT ORDINANCE I SENT OUT. I WASN'T ABLE TO GET THE CITY ATTORNEY TO REVIEW IT BEFORE THE PACKET WENT OUT. I SENT OUT AN ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THE CITY REVIEWED COPY A FEW DAYS AGO AND YOU HAVE A WRITTEN VERSION OF THE SAME THING IN FRONT OF YOU. THIS IS THE CITY ATTORNEY REVIEWED VERSION OF THE ORDINANCE. BASED ON YOUR RECOMMENDATION WE'LL ALSO INCLUDE THIS BUT WE'LL ALSO HAVE THE CLEAN COPY OF THE ORDINANCE FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING. JUST SO THAT YOU KNOW, YOU CAN RECOMMEND SOMETHING DIFFERENT THAN WHAT'S IN THERE IF YOU FEEL THAT TO YOUR MAINTENANCE BOND IS BETTER, YOU CAN DO THAT. IF YOU THINK SOMETHING ELSE SHOULD BE DIFFERENT, YOU CAN RECOMMEND THAT AS WELL. HAVING SAID THAT, I GO BACK TO YOU. >> AT THIS TIME, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS THERE ANYBODY TO SPEAK ABOUT THE PUBLIC HEARING GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING NOW. WHAT IS YOUR RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE TIME FRAME? >> MY RECOMMENDATION WHEN WE ASKED FOR CITY COUNCIL DIRECTION WAS FOR TWO YEARS ON THE MAINTENANCE BOND, A 100 PERCENT ON THE MAINTENANCE BOND AMOUNT, AND FOR STAFF ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. >> THIS IS ONE YEAR? >> THAT'S ONE YEAR BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT COUNCIL SAID THEY WANTED. >> BUT YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS IS TWO? >> MY RECOMMENDATION WAS TWO. >> DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR WALT. >> I DO. GO AHEAD. >> MY QUESTION IS, WHAT IS YOUR REASONING FOR TWO? [00:05:03] >> MY REASONING FOR TWO IS THAT IT PROVIDES A LONGER TIMEFRAME FOR THE CITY TO BE ABLE TO DETERMINE IF EVERYTHING HAS BEEN PROPERLY INSTALLED AND CONSTRUCTED. IF YOU NOTE IN THE BACKUP, I SURVEYED A FEW OTHER CITIES AS SEVERAL OF THEM ALSO HAVE TWO-YEAR MAINTENANCE BONDS. I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S MORE PRUDENT TO HAVE A TWO-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND, BUT IT'S KIND OF LIKE A SETBACK. WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 20 FEET AND 25 FEET AND 30 FEET? IT'S JUST A NUMBER. FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I THINK TWO YEARS DOES A BETTER JOB OF PROTECTING THE PUBLIC INTERESTS. >> WELL, THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY QUESTION. WHY THE HURRY IN THE ONE YEAR BECAUSE THAT SEEMS LIKE YOU'RE PUTTING A STRAIN ON PEOPLE TO GET THINGS DONE AND IT MAY NOT BE DONE AS CAREFULLY. >> NO, NO. >> THIS IS AFTER. >> THE WAY THE PROCESS WORKS IS THAT, THE DEVELOPER IN ORDER TO INSTALL THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS HAS TO GET WHAT'S CALLED A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT BEFORE THEY CAN GO OUT AND START MOVING DIRT AROUND TO INSTALL THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. DURING THAT PROCESS, THE CITY IS ALSO INSPECTING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THOSE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS. AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION IS DONE AND BEFORE A FINAL PLAQUE CAN BE RECORDED, USUALLY WHAT HAPPENS IS THEY'RE STILL DOING THE CONSTRUCTION WHILE THE FINAL PLANT IS UNDER REVIEW AND GETTING APPROVED THROUGH THE PROCESS. BEFORE THE PLANT CAN BE RECORDED, ALL THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS HAVE TO BE ACCEPTED. AS PART OF THE ACCEPTANCE PROCESS, THE CITY ENGINEER, THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, OTHER CITY STAFF ARE GOING TO GO OUT AND INSPECT THE WORK TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYTHING'S DONE THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DONE. THERE'S A PUNCH LIST THAT'S DEVELOPED IF THINGS THAT NEED TO BE EITHER FIXED, REPAIRED, REPLACED, WHATEVER. THE DEVELOPER GOES OUT AND DOES THOSE FIXES, REPAIRS, REPLACEMENTS. THEN EVERYBODY GOES BACK OUT AGAIN AND DOES ANOTHER REVIEW TO MAKE SURE EVERYTHING'S DONE, AND ONLY AFTER THAT DOES THE CITY ENGINEER MAKE A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE READY FOR ACCEPTANCE SUBJECT TO THE SUBMISSION OF THE MAINTENANCE BOND AND EVERYTHING ELSE. IT'S NOT REALLY A RAPID PROCESS. IT JUST MEANS THAT THE ACTUAL MAINTENANCE BOND FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IS NOW AS THE ORDINANCE SAYS, ONE YEAR RATHER THAN IN A CURRENT PROCESS OF PRELIMINARY ACCEPTANCE WITH A ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND AND THEN A FINAL ACCEPTANCE WITH ANOTHER ONE YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND. >> JUST TO CLARIFY, THE CLOCK STARTS OR THAT THE TIMEFRAME STARTS WHEN THE ACCEPTANCE IS ISSUED? >> THAT'S CORRECT. WHEN ACCEPTED, THE ONE-YEAR MAINTENANCE BOND STARTS. >> DO WE HAVE ANY CLUE WHAT THE BURDEN IS TO THE DEVELOPER IN TERMS OF ONE YEAR VERSUS TWO YEARS IN TERMS OF COST. I HAVE NO IDEA. I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT IT'S OVERLY SIGNIFICANT BECAUSE IT'S THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT'S THE SAME. WHETHER IT'S ONE YEAR OR TWO YEARS, THERE'S PROBABLY WHOEVER THEY'RE GETTING THE BOND FROM, THERE'S PROBABLY A LARGER CHARGE FOR TWO YEARS THAN FOR ONE YEAR. BUT FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, IT DOESN'T REALLY MATTER IF THE CITY FEELS THAT TWO YEARS IS WHAT IT TAKES IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC INTEREST. THAT'S WHAT IT IS, AND THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE OUGHT TO BE DOING. IF IT'S ONE YEAR, THEN THAT'S WHAT IT IS AND THAT'S WHAT PEOPLE OUGHT TO BE DOING. KNOW THAT THAT COST NEVER REALLY PLAYED INTO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORDINANCE YOU HAVE. >> I HAVE A QUESTION. READING THE OLD ONE AND COMPARING IT TO THE NEW ONE, AND TRYING TO UNDERSTAND US GETTING BLINDSIDED IN THE PAST AS FAR AS ALL OF A SUDDEN, WE'RE LOOKING AT A SUBDIVISION AND THERE ARE A LOT OF 40-FOOT LOTS AND WE'RE SAYING, WELL HOW DID THIS HAPPEN. WE'D BEEN OPPOSED TO THESE LOTS AND ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE HEARING WE DON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHANGE IT BECAUSE IT'S IN A PLAN SUBDIVISION. I WONDERED IF THE INITIAL PHASE GETTING WAIVERED AND NOT LOOKED AT, A CITY COUNCIL COULD HAVE HAD ANY THING TO DO WITH ALL OF A SUDDEN THERE'S A SUBDIVISION BUILT. THE ENGINEER PROVES IT TO THE SPECS, IT'S GOT 40-FOOT LOT. IT'S A DONE DEAL. >> THOSE ARE GOING TO BE TWO SEPARATE THINGS. THE SIZE OF THE LOTS ARE DICTATED BY THE ZONING DISTRICT THAT THE PROPERTY IS IN. [00:10:04] THAT'S ALREADY PART OF THE PROCESS BUILT-IN FROM THE GET-GO. IF SOMEBODY COMES IN WITH A PLOT ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT'S IN THE SS7 POINT TWO ZONING DISTRICT, THE LOT IS SUPPOSED TO BE 70 FEET WIDE, THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE 7200 SQUARE FEET OF LOT AREA. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE AT LEAST A 100 FEET IN DEPTH. THAT'S GOT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS PART OF THE PROCESS. NONE OF THIS CONSTRUCTION HAPPENS UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. THERE HAS TO BE AT LEAST A PRELIMINARY PLOT IN PLACE BEFORE THE CITY ENGINEER EVEN LOOKS AT THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THEY'RE APPLES TO ORANGES IN THIS CASE. >> WHY DID THE CITY WANT THE ONE-YEAR? WHY DID THEY CHANGE THE OTHER CITY COUNCIL THEY GIVE REASON OR? >> FOR THEIR [OVERLAPPING]. >> THEY COULDN'T HAVE FIRST ONE OUT. IF THERE'S ANY DIFFERENCE I WOULD THINK IT WOULD BE A DIFFERENCE IN FROM 25 PERCENT TO 100 PERCENT. IT WOULDN'T BE DIFFERENT FOR TWO YEARS BECAUSE IT'S JUST AN INSURANCE POST. IT GO'S THROUGH METROPOLITAN, I HOPE THERE'S SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE IT'S TAKING THE CITY, CAN'T BE ELECTED CITY COUNCIL OUT OF THE EQUATION. WE DON'T WANT TO BE BOTHERED WITH A PRELIMINARY. WE JUST WANT TO GO AHEAD AND DO THIS AND APPROVE IT FOR A YEAR. >> MAY I SHARE AN EXPERIENCE WHEN I WAS ON COUNCIL, I THINK IT WAS PRETTY THE LDC IN PLACE. IT WAS LIKE SOMETHING NEW, AND THE STAFF WASN'T REALLY QUITE READY FOR IT. I UNDERSTAND, BUT PROCEDURES ARE IN BETTER PLACE RIGHT NOW, BUT WE HAD A REALLY BAD EXPERIENCE WITH THAT. WHEN THE DISCUSSION ABOUT THE BONDING, I'M GOING AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. IT WAS A CASE OF A MAJOR SUBDIVISION WHICH WAS PRIOR TO OUR 40-FOOT LOT, LARGER LOTS. HOWEVER, SOMETHING HAPPENED WITH THE CONCRETE MIX AND DOWN THE ROAD IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF CONCRETE THAT HAD TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY THE DEVELOPER. WITHOUT A PROCESS IN PLACE AND SOME BACKUP, WE AS TAXPAYERS WOULD HAVE BEEN REBUILDING MAJOR STREETS. I'M IN FAVOR OF 2 YEARS JUST BECAUSE [BACKGROUND] WE'RE GOING TO DRY PERIODS, [OVERLAPPING] I WILL NOT MENTION BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT HERE WHEN THAT HAPPENED. THEY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. >> DOES ANYBODY REALLY WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? >> I'LL MOVE. DO WE HAVE SOMETHING THAT SAYS HOW WE'RE GOING TO MOVE IT, THEN I'M GOING TO CHANGE IT TO TWO YEARS. HOW DO YOU WANT US TO MAKE THIS MOTION? I'M GOING TO MOVE THAT. WE RECOMMEND THE APPROVAL OF THE DRAFT ORDINANCE, AMENDING SECTION 23 DASH 98, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT ACCEPTANCE SUBJECT TO ANY CHANGES OR REVISIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY ACCEPTING THAT WE AMEND IT TO BE A TWO-YEAR. [OVERLAPPING] >> I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE SUBJECT TO CHANGING THE TIME DURATION TO TWO YEARS IS READY FOR THE DISCUSSION. IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. >> AYE. >> OF COURSE SAME SIDE, NEAR-UNANIMOUS. WE HAVE ANOTHER ITEM ON HERE FOR A DISCUSSION OF COMMISSION-DIRECTED FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS. [3. Discussion on Commission directed future agenda items] >> THIS IS JUST AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU'LL TO LET US KNOW IF THERE'S SOMETHING THAT YOU HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT, OR YOU WANT TO REVIEW IN THE ORDINANCE SO THAT WE CAN START PLANNING THOSE THINGS OUT FOR FUTURE AGENDAS. >> MY ONLY THING THAT'S BEEN AN ISSUE HERE IS THE 43-FOOT LOTS. WHERE DOES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED? I THINK WE HAVE A HANDLE ON THAT, WE MADE IT PRETTY CLEAR THAT WE'RE NOT ACCEPTING THOSE ANYMORE, BUT IF WE HAVE ANOTHER WAVE OF DEVELOPERS >> FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS, YOU'D LIKE TO HAVE BOTH OR ANY ONE STAFF PRESENT ALTERNATIVES FOR US TO CONSIDER TO ADDRESS THAT SPECIFIC ISSUE? >> YES, THANK YOU. >> DISCUSSION ON LESS THAN 50-FOOT LOTS? >> RIGHT. [00:15:02] >> WELL, I WOULD SIMPLY ADD THAT IN ANY AREAS WHERE YOU FEEL LIKE WE WOULD BENEFIT FROM ADDITIONAL EDUCATION IN SPECIFIC AREAS, WE WOULD WELCOME THAT. ESPECIALLY ON DAYS LIKE TODAY WHEN THE AGENDA IS LIMITED. >> IF WE DO GET A HANDLE ON HOW MUCH PROPERTY IS NOW SITTING WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, THAT WOULD BE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BECAUSE I SEE IT ON THE LITTLE BLOGS EVERYWHERE. THAT'S USUALLY WHERE WE GOT IN A REP WITH A 40-FOOT LOT WAS PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND [INAUDIBLE] THE DEVELOPER CAME IN AND SAID THIS IS MY PLAN. AM I CORRECT ON THAT OR I'M GOING IN THE WRONG WAY? >> NO, YOU'RE HEADING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION THERE. BRIEFLY, PLAN DEVELOPMENT IS A ZONING DISTRICT ALLOWED BY THE ZONING ORDINANCE THAT REQUIRES A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL. YOU ARE CORRECT. THERE'S A LOT OF PDE ZONING ON THE ZONING MAP, AND NOBODY CAN SEEM TO FIND ANY ORDINANCES ASSOCIATED WITH ANY [LAUGHTER] OF THOSE WITH A VAST MAJORITY OF THOSE AREAS. IT HAS CAUSED A BIT OF A PROBLEM FOR US WHEN PEOPLE ASK US ABOUT IT, IT'S LIKE, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN DO ANY OF THE THINGS THAT YOU WANT TO DO IN THAT PDE ZONING DISTRICT BECAUSE I CAN'T FIND AN ORDINANCE THAT TELLS ME WHAT'S ALLOWED IN THAT ZONING DISTRICT. I THINK THAT SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED GOING FORWARD, IS IDENTIFYING THOSE PDES ON THE ZONING MAP WHERE WE CAN'T FIND ORDINANCES FOR THEM, AND PERHAPS DOING SOME SORT OF ONE OR MORE REZONING OF THEIR PROPERTY TO A ZONING DISTRICT WHERE YOU CAN ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT YOU'RE ALLOWED TO DO. >> I WAS ACTUALLY ON COUNCIL WHEN ALL THAT HAPPENED. [LAUGHTER] IT WAS ONE OF THOSE THINGS I QUESTIONED AS WELL. BUT IT WAS LIKE NOBODY THOUGHT ANYTHING WAS GOING TO HAPPEN WITH IT FOR THE NEXT 50 YEARS. IT WAS JUST THE IDEA OF HAVING SOMETHING, THE THOUGHT PROCESS THAT THERE WOULD BE A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITUATION AT SOME TIME IN THE FUTURE. THE THINGS WE'RE JUST PLOPPED ONTO THE ZONING MAP. I APPRECIATE YOU SAYING WE NEED TO RELOOK AT THAT FOR MAYBE REZONING AND MOVE FORWARD, ESPECIALLY IF WE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS TO WHERE WE'RE PLANNING TO GO WITH THINGS THAT FIT TOGETHER. >> WELL, ANOTHER ITEM YOU MIGHT CONSIDER ADDING AS AN AGENDA ITEM, EITHER IN JULY OR AUGUST, IS WHAT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS ARE GOING TO BE IN THE COUNCIL IN TERMS OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS NEXT FISCAL YEAR SO THAT WE MIGHT HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT. >> ACTUALLY, WHAT HAS HAPPENED IS THAT AT THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING, THE COUNCIL CREATED A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH IS BASICALLY ALL OF YOU PLUS ONE PERSON FROM THE ETJ, BECAUSE THE CITY'S CURRENT IMPACT FEE AREAS ARE IN BOTH THE CITY LIMITS AND OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS. THAT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE IS WHAT MAKES THE RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN. >> YOU SAID THAT WE ARE BY [INAUDIBLE]? >> ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION WERE NAMED AS BEING PART OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMISSION [BACKGROUND] PLUS ONE PERSON FROM THE ETJ, AND IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY, I THINK THAT WAS WILLIAMS TECNO. AT SOME POINT HERE IN THE FUTURE, POSSIBLY JULY, MAYBE AUGUST P&C MEETING, WHAT WILL PROBABLY HAPPEN IS THAT WE WILL DO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. ON THE LAST DAY, I WORKED AND SCHEDULED ALL OF THOSE FOR LIKE 15 MINUTES BEFORE THE P&C MEETING. THEY NEVER FINISHED IN [LAUGHTER] 15 MINUTES SO THE P&C MEETING ALWAYS STARTS A LITTLE BIT LATER, BUT WE'LL FIGURE SOMETHING OUT. [LAUGHTER] >> DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS? IF NOT, WE WILL BE ADJOURNED. [NOISE] THANK YOU ALL. >> THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. >> YEAH. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.