2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a request for approval of an ordinance rezoning 0.3937 acres from the Commercial General District to the Central Business District, for property located at the Southeast corner of E. Peach St. at S. Velasco St., Hwy 288B, Angleton, TX; situated on Lot(s) One (1), Two (2), Three (3), and the west ½ of Lot (4) in Block Twenty (20), of the City of Angleton, a subdivision in Brazoria County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 1, Page 12, of the Plat Records of Brazoria County, Texas

[2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a request for approval of an ordinance rezoning 0.3937 acres from the Commercial General District to the Central Business District, for property located at the Southeast corner of E. Peach St. at S. Velasco St., Hwy 288B, Angleton, TX; situated on Lot(s) One (1), Two (2), Three (3), and the west ½ of Lot (4) in Block Twenty (20), of the City of Angleton, a subdivision in Brazoria County, Texas, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Volume 1, Page 12, of the Plat Records of Brazoria County, Texas]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING.

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE REZONING 0.3937 ACRES FROM COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST PEACH STREET AND SOUTH VELASCO STREET, HIGHWAY 38 B ANGLETON, TEXAS.

SITUATED ON LOTS ONE, TWO AND THREE AND THE WEST HALF A LOT FOUR IN THE BLOCK 20 OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON, A SUBDIVISION IN BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN VOLUME ONE, PAGE 12 OF THE PLAT RECORDS OF BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS.

MR. SPRAGUE'S. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ITEM IS BEING BROUGHT TO YOU.

A PETITION FOR REZONING OF THE .39 ACRES LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN VICINITY.

AND THE PROPERTY OWNERS HERE FOR THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HERE AGAIN ARE ASKING FOR THIS PARTICULAR PIECE TO BE REZONED TO CBD, WHICH IS OUR CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

WE'LL MOVE DOWN TO THE LAND USE PLAN, BASICALLY THIS WHOLE ENTIRE DOWNTOWN REGION, AND SHE'LL PULL UP THE GRAPHIC.

IF YOU DON'T MIND MY REAR OF THE DOWNTOWN VICINITY.

BUT THE PROPERTY WOULD FALL INTO THE PROPER AREA FOR DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT.

IF YOU GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE OR MAP, WE'LL SEE WHERE THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT DOES MEANDER FURTHER SOUTH.

SO KEEP ROLLING, IF YOU DON'T MIND.

BUT THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THAT AREA FALL WITHIN THE ALIGNMENT WITH THOSE SCENES THAT YOU WOULD TYPICALLY SEE.

AND YOU'RE SEEING SOME OF THE THINGS IN THE REDEVELOPMENT OF DOWNTOWN WHERE, OF COURSE, IT'S USUALLY YOUR PUBLIC GOVERNMENT.

BUT NOW WE'RE TURNING INTO CITIES FOCUSING MORE ON ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICTS, SOME LEVEL OF HOUSING AND MORE AREAS FOR PUBLIC GATHERING AND SPACES.

SO THE APPLICANTS HERE ARE TRYING TO WORK WITHIN THE DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN PREPARED, SUCH AS THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE LAND USE PLAN. SO WHAT THEY'RE ASKING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PLANS.

AND WE ALSO TALKED ABOUT THE ANGLETON LIVABLE CITIES CENTER PLAN, WHICH ALSO PROMOTES SOME OF THOSE THINGS THAT I DESCRIBED.

SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING WHERE THE PUBLIC CAN GIVE COMMENT.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD MAKE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL AND WHICH STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REZONING FROM THE CENTRAL TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

IT WAS, I'M SORRY, A COMMERCIAL GENERAL.

CG COMMERCIAL GENERAL TENDS TO BE MOST OF YOUR BIG BOX RETAIL.

IT WOULD COVER ANYTHING RETAIL, RESTAURANTS, BUT HOWEVER, SOME OF THE PARAMETERS WOULD NOT FIT INTO YOUR TYPICAL DOWNTOWN AREA.

SO THIS WOULD BE MORE KEEPING AND IN ALIGNMENT AND IN SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

SO STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU WOULD PROPOSE THIS TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL FOR WHAT'S BEEN SAID.

WE DO HAVE SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE AREA IN WHICH THERE ARE SOME HOUSING, BUT THERE ARE SOME HODGEPODGE AREAS WHERE THERE IS SOME CONVERSION TO SMALL OFFICE IN THE VICINITY AS WELL.

SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING, STAFF WILL BE HERE TO ANSWER THOSE.

AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ADD ANYTHING TO WHAT I'VE SAID.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT NOW OR THE PUBLIC EITHER WAY, AT THIS TIME, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? MS. MAYNOR. GOOD AFTERNOON, COMMISSIONERS.

MY HUSBAND AND I OWN THIS PROPERTY.

WE ALSO LIVE AT ONE HARVEST GLEN HERE IN ANGLETON.

SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING TO DO AND WHAT WE WOULD LIKE YOU ALL TO CONSIDER IS THE REZONE OF THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE IT IS IN LINE WITH YOUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ALSO THE LIVERPOOL CENTER STUDY.

IT WOULD ALSO HOPEFULLY IT MAY BRING SOME ADDITIONAL BUSINESSES TO THE AREA IF IT WERE DEVELOPED IN THIS WAY.

THE CURRENT ZONING DOES PROVIDE SOME RESTRICTIONS LIKE PARKING.

THIS IS A VERY SMALL LOT.

SO IN THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, THIS ALLOWS FOR OFFSITE PARKING OR AGREEMENT WITH OTHER LOCATED BUSINESSES THAT COULD POTENTIALLY PROVIDE PARKING IN THAT

[00:05:06]

AREA. SO IT JUST OPENS UP A.

THE DEVELOPERS, WHETHER THAT'S US AS OWNERS OR IF WE SELL THE PROPERTY TO REALLY MAKE THIS A CONTRIBUTE TO THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. THANK YOU, MEGAN.

WE MAY HAVE QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT RIGHT NOW, THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE. GOING TWICE, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE ON TO THE DISCUSSION PORTION.

OTIS, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING TO ADD? NOTHING TO ADD, SIR. JUST IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, WE'LL BE GLAD TO TRY TO ANSWER THOSE FOR YOU.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? NO. AND YOU PRETTY MUCH ANSWERED WHAT I WOULD ASK BECAUSE WHEN I WAS TRYING TO SEE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CENTRAL AND THE OTHER WAS PRETTY MUCH PEDESTRIAN.

MORE WAS IN LINE WITH THE CENTRAL AND THEN MORE PARKING.

SO AND I FIGURE WITH A LOT SIZE, THAT'S PROBABLY WHY YOU ANSWERED IT.

SO DO YOU WANT A MOTION? I MOVE THAT WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE REZONING AND APPROXIMATE 0.9 ACRES OF LAND FROM THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT.

THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE.

SO BY SAYING AYE.

OPPOSE SAME SIGN? MOTION AS UNANIMOUS.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM THREE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS, BY AMENDING AND REVISING CHAPTER 8.5 FOOD AND

[3. Discussion and possible action on an Ordinance amending the Code of Ordinances of the City of Angleton, Texas, by amending and revising Chapter 8.5 Food and Food Establishments Article I. In General, Section 8.5-2. Definitions, Article II. Permit, Section 8.5-10. Required, Section 8.5-11. Duration, Article III. Inspections, Section 8.5-20. Annual Inspections, Reinspections, and New Inspections, Article V. Temporary and Mobile Food Establishments, Section 8.5-62. Mobile Food Establishments; Generally, and Sec.8.5-63. Unrestricted And Restricted Mobile Food Unit Regulations as contained in “Exhibit A”; Adopting Sec 8.5-66. Mobile Food Courts as contained in “Exhibit B”; providing for the regulation of food and food establishments; providing a penalty; providing for severability; providing for repeal; and providing an effective date.]

FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS.

ARTICLE ONE. IN GENERAL, SECTION 8.5-2 DEFINITIONS ARTICLE TWO PERMIT SECTION 8.5.

DASH TEN. REQUIRED SECTIONS 8.5.

DASH 11 DURATION ARTICLE THREE INSPECTION SECTION 8.5.

DASH 20.

ANNUAL INSPECTIONS RE INSPECTIONS AND NEW INSPECTIONS.

ARTICLE FIVE TEMPORARY MOBILE HOME ESTABLISHMENTS.

SECTION 8.5-6 TO MOBILE FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS GENERALLY AND SECTION 8.5-63.

UNRESTRICTED AND RESTRICTED MOBILE FOOD UNIT REGULATIONS AS CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT A ADOPTING SECTION 8.5-66.

MOBILE FOOD COURTS, AS CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT B, PROVIDING FOR THE REGULATION OF FOOD AND FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS, PROVIDING A PENALTY, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR REPEAL AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THAT'S A MOUTHFUL.

SO CAN YOU BOIL THIS DOWN FOR FOR ALL OF US? YES, SIR.

THANK YOU.

AND THIS ITEM IS ACTUALLY DEALING WITH, OF COURSE, MOBILE FOOD UNITS.

A LOT OF CITIES, WHAT THEY DO IS THEY TRY TO GO IN AND FIGURE OUT A WAY THAT WE CAN MAKE THIS FIT INTO THE COMMUNITY WITHOUT A LOT OF HODGEPODGE.

SO UNFORTUNATELY, OUT IN COUNTY AREAS, YOU PROBABLY SEE ALL TYPE OF TACO STANDS THAT BASICALLY ARE EVERYWHERE ON EVERY INTERSECTION.

SO WHAT THIS DOES IS THIS ALLOWS US TO DEVELOP SOME LEVEL OF STANDARD TO BE FLEXIBLE WITH FOOD TRUCKS BECAUSE AS IT IS A NEW WAY OF EATING SINCE THE COVID PANDEMIC, A LOT OF RESTAURANTS ARE TRYING TO BE MORE OPEN AIR.

SO THE CITY MANAGER AND ALSO LEADERSHIP BROUGHT THIS BEFORE THE COMMUNITY BACK IN APRIL.

SO THERE WERE SOME TOWN HALLS THAT OCCURRED FOR PUBLIC INPUT.

WE INVITED THE FOOD TRUCK BUSINESSES TO THOSE HEARINGS, AND SOME OF THE AREAS OF CONCERNS ARE OUTLINED IN THIS TEXT AMENDMENT.

THAT, NUMBER ONE, GIVES US MORE DEFINITIONS, GIVES US FLEXIBILITY ON HOURS OF OPERATION WHERE THEY CAN GATHER.

AND THEN THE T FOR RULES WERE ROLLED OVER, WHERE THE STATE REGULATIONS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH FROM A HEALTH AND SAFETY PERSPECTIVE.

SO WE DO HAVE THE HEALTH INSPECTORS THAT HAVE TO BE LICENSED AS WELL AS THOSE THAT ARE RUNNING THE FOOD TRUCKS.

SO WHAT THIS ORDINANCE DOES IS IT PROVIDES FOR THE SEPARATION OF THE UNITS AND ALSO THE SAFETY MEASURES.

I'M NOT GOING TO READ THE TEXT, BUT WE'RE GOING TO KIND OF LIKE FLOW THROUGH IT.

SO IF THERE'S AN AREA THAT YOU READ THAT YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, JUST SAY STOP.

WE'LL DO IT VERY INFORMALLY.

BUT JUST TO MAKE IT PRODUCTIVE, I WANT TO KIND OF FLOW THROUGH THE AREAS AND JUST DESCRIBE THEM WITHOUT READING ALL THE TEXT.

IT IS AVAILABLE FOR THE PUBLIC'S CONSUMPTION IN TERMS OF INFORMATION, IN TERMS OF WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.

BUT BECAUSE OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, WE HAVE TO POST IT THIS WAY.

IT'S A LOT OF DETAIL, BUT FOR THE SAKE OF TIME WE'LL KIND OF ROAD THROUGH THE RED MARKS, THE RED LINES THAT SHOW YOU THE BEFORE AND AFTER.

SO WHAT YOU SEE IN BLACK IS WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE ON THE BOOKS.

AND WHAT YOU'LL SEE IN RED IS WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED.

SO IF YOU WERE TO ROLL FROM PAGE 35 AND WE'RE GOING TO USE PAGE 35 IN YOUR IN YOUR DOCUMENT, BECAUSE IT GOES WITHOUT SOME OF THE MARKUPS, I THINK, AND WE COULD MOVE THROUGH IT PRETTY QUICKLY.

[00:10:03]

JUST KEEP ROLLING UNTIL YOU'RE 35, UNTIL YOU SEE THE RED MARKS.

HOPEFULLY YOUR SCREEN IS IN COLOR.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

THERE YOU GO. SO AS I STATED EARLIER, WE'RE ADDING THE PROVISION FOR A FOOD COURT.

MANY CITIES ARE ALLOWING FOR THE FARMER'S MARKET IDEA.

BASICALLY, ESSENTIALLY, THAT'S WHAT IT IS.

WE ACTUALLY HAVE A PENDING APPLICATION FOR A FOOD COURT WHERE AN INDIVIDUAL COULD COME IN AND CREATE A GATHERING SITUATION THAT WOULD HAVE SEATING, THAT WOULD HAVE THE PROPER RESTROOMS AND AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES TO COME IN AND CONDUCT BUSINESS AND PROVIDE FOR GOOD FOOD AND SOMETIMES ENTERTAINMENT.

SO YOU'LL BE SEEING THESE TYPE OF APPLICATIONS.

SO THAT FIRST DEFINITION KIND OF DESCRIBES THE MOBILE FOOD COURT FOR YOU.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT BEFORE WE MOVE FORWARD? SO IT'S BASICALLY ACCOMMODATING AREAS ON SITE BASIS, WHEREAS, YOU KNOW, THE GATHERING OF SEVERAL UNITS AND THEN IT WOULD ALSO BE LESS THAN 30 DAYS.

SO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO IS BECOME MOBILE.

THEY HAVE TO TAKE IT TO THE FACILITY TO BE SERVICED AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

SO KEEP ROLLING THROUGH.

WE'LL GO THROUGH SOME OF THE RED MARKS.

THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT. THAT'S GOOD.

OKAY, WE'LL STOP RIGHT THERE.

THAT FIRST DIVISION THAT YOU CAN BARELY SEE AT THE TOP.

WHAT THE TEAM DID WAS THEY DID ALLOW FOR THE KIDS THAT ACTUALLY HAVE THE LEMONADE STANDS UNDER THE AGE OF 17 AND UNDER.

THEY WOULD BE EXEMPT FROM THIS PARTICULAR ORDINANCE.

SO LET'S KEEP MOVING THROUGH.

SO THE LOCATION, BASICALLY THEY HAVE TO SATISFY THE ZONING IN TERMS OF LOCATION, AS YOU SEE, I CAN'T SEE THAT PAGE NUMBER. YOU PROBABLY CAN HELP ME WITH THAT.

PAGE 42. THANK YOU.

SO HERE THE TYPE OF TRUCKS ARE BASICALLY HERE.

THEY BASICALLY HAVE TO GIVE A NOTARIZED STATEMENT THAT THEY'RE BEING SERVICED BY A CENTRAL PREPARATION FACILITY AND THEN GIVE US THE INFORMATION AS TO WHERE THEY WOULD BE LOCATED. KEEP MOVING THROUGH.

UNTIL YOU SEE RED.

THANK YOU. SO WE DO ALLOW THE ANNUAL PERMIT IN WHICH OUR INSPECTORS WOULD ALLOW THE PERMIT, BUT THEY ARE ACTUALLY INSPECTED ON THE REGULAR BASIS JUST TO MAKE SURE THEY STAY IN COMPLIANCE WITH TFA AND ALSO THE LOCAL AND SAFETY MEASURES IN TERMS OF PROXIMITY TO OTHER UNITS.

ALL RIGHT. AS I SAID EARLIER, IT HAS TO BE READILY MOVABLE.

IT CANNOT BE PLACED ON BLOCKS AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

AND KEEP ROLLING THROUGH.

THIS DEALS WITH, OF COURSE, TIME IN TERMS OF HOURS OF OPERATION.

AND THEN CERTAIN THINGS CANNOT HAPPEN AFTER 11:00 PM.

THOSE ARE QUIET HOURS THERE.

AND THEN THAT MIDDLE ITEM THERE, IF YOU GO BACK UP, OF COURSE, IT'S THE RESTROOM ISSUE.

OF COURSE, SOME OF THEM DON'T WANT TO BUILD RESTROOMS ON SITE.

THERE ARE SOME UNITS THAT WE'RE ALLOWING THAT ARE CONSIDERED PORTABLE IN NATURE, BUT IT'S ALMOST BUILT LIKE A BUILDING.

IT HAS AIR CONDITIONING.

SO SOME OF YOUR NEW COURTS WILL HAVE THAT TYPE OF BUILDING.

WHEN THEY DO NOT HAVE THE RESTROOM FACILITIES, THEY CAN HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOCAL RESTAURANT OR BUSINESS WITH THAT WRITTEN PERMISSION, BUT IT HAS TO BE WITHIN 100 FEET OF THE FOOD COURT.

SO THAT'S WHAT YOU SEE THERE.

SO. ALL OF THOSE DETAILS ARE WRITTEN INTO IT.

DURATION OF EVENTS HERE.

BASICALLY, IT'S PERMITTED TO OPERATE UNDER THE TEMPORARY FOOD ESTABLISHMENT PERMIT THREE DAYS PER WEEK, AS YOU SEE THERE, FOR UP TO THREE DAYS PER WEEK.

AND THEY HAVE TO STAY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE OPERATING HOURS.

SO THAT SORT OF RUNS THROUGH THAT FIRST EXHIBIT.

AND THEN EXHIBIT B WOULD DEAL WITH OTHER PARAMETERS FOR THE FOOD COURTS BEING THAT.

EACH SITE AT THE MOBILE FOOD COURT HAS TO BE LOCATED AND OPERATED WITH THE PORTABLE WATER AND ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE. SO WE'LL WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THEY DO THAT AND DEAL WITH ANY TYPE OF GENERATOR REQUIREMENTS.

SO THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE KIND OF.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS SO FAR? I KNOW I'M RUSHING THROUGH THIS, BUT IT'S A LOT OF TEXT.

THEN WE TALK ABOUT THE RESTROOMS AGAIN HERE WITH LITTLE MORE, A LITTLE BIT MORE DETAIL IN TERMS OF PROXIMITY AND THAT THEY HAVE TO BE KEPT CLEAN AND WHAT HAVE YOU. SO, SANDY CHERRY CONDITIONS ARE IMPORTANT, SO OUR INSPECTORS WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY STAY IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT FOOD COURTS IN TERMS OF OPERATION MONDAY

[00:15:02]

THROUGH SUNDAY.

WE WROTE IN THE HOURS OF OPERATION FROM 8 A.M.

TO 11 P.M.

AND SOUND AND ALL OF THOSE ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES THAT SOMETIMES COME UP.

THEY ARE COVERED IN THE REVISIONS.

AND WASTE, RECYCLABLES AND ALL OF THAT HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH.

AND THEN THE OTHER ISSUE WAS PARKING.

TYPICALLY, WE WOULD LOVE TO SEE THESE THINGS SATISFY OUR PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

SO THAT'S THE IDEA.

WE WILL FROM TIME TO TIME GET THOSE COURTS THAT MIGHT BE EXISTING IN NATURE THAT NEED A WAIVER.

SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH SOME TYPE OF VARIANCE PROCESS IN ORDER TO OPERATE, BECAUSE SOMETIMES IT CAN CAN BE MORE COSTLY IN TERMS OF A REQUIREMENT, BUT IT IS A REQUIREMENT THAT THE PARKING BE PAID, AS YOU SEE THERE.

I THINK THAT WAS A DISCUSSION.

WOW. EXACTLY.

SO THERE IS A FORM OF COMPASSION THAT'S ALLOWED UNDER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

STAFF DOES SUPPORT THOSE JUST AS LONG AS THEY CAN CONTROL THE DAMAGE TO THE ROAD IN TERMS OF MUD AND DEBRIS.

SO WHAT? THAT WOULD KEEP OFF THE ROCKS AND GRAVEL OFF OF THE ROAD, THEY WOULD HAVE THE.

COMPACTED ACCORDING TO STANDARDS FOR HEAVY VEHICLES AND WHAT HAVE YOU TO KEEP IT OFF THE ROAD.

SO YOU WOULD KEEP THE THE ACTUAL APRON OUT TO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE FIRST 30 OR SO FEET, WHATEVER THAT RIGHT AWAY IS WOULD PREVENT THAT.

SO THOSE KIND OF STANDARDS ARE IN FLEXIBILITY, ARE PROVIDED AS WELL.

I WOULD SAY IN THE INSTANCE OF THE VARIANCE REQUEST, WE CAN ALLOW THAT.

[INAUDIBLE] . CONCRETE DESIGN NOT TO THAT STANDARD, AS LONG AS IT'S PROTECTED, AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T.

VISUAL SIGHTINGS OF DEBRIS ON THE ROAD OR SOME CRITERION SAYS DO IT NOT.

RIGHT. NOT TO THE NORMAL BUILDING STANDARDS AS LONG AS YOU [INAUDIBLE].

SO WITH THAT, TYPICALLY WHAT SOME CITIES WOULD DO, THEY WOULD ALLOW FOR A PERVIOUS TYPE OF ARRANGEMENT.

THERE ARE PAVERS THAT THEY CAN USE THAT ALLOW THE GRASS TO GROW THROUGH, BUT AT THE SAME TIME IT DEALS WITH THE DRAINAGE.

SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE KIND OF DESCRIBING HERE, IS IT COULD BE A FORM OF COMPACTION, AS I STATED, THAT WILL HOLD HEAVY VEHICLES.

I THINK THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR A LOT MORE FLEXIBILITY.

SO. I THINK WHAT WE CAN DO IS JUST LIST THAT AS A WAIVER OPTION B WELL, AGAIN, AS LONG AS IT'S IN HERE THAT SAYS THERE'S AN OPTION.

RIGHT. AND THEN THAT WOULD HELP IF IN THE EXTREME CONDITIONS.

YES. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR INPUT ON THAT? I HAVE A QUESTION JUST OF CLARIFICATION.

SO AT THE FARMERS MARKET, WE GET MOBILE VENDORS.

SO I'M HEARING US ADDRESS SOME OF THAT.

BUT WE'RE ALSO TALKING ABOUT MOBILE FOOD COURTS.

YES. SO SOMEBODY WANTS TO SET UP A MOBILE FOOD COURT, WHICH WOULD BE DIFFERENT FROM A VENDOR WHO'S COME INTO THE FARMER'S MARKET.

I THINK THE FARMER'S MARKET WAS A DIFFERENT BALLGAME AT THAT TIME.

AND WHAT A LOT OF CITIES WILL DO IS THEY WILL ALLOW IT MORE ON THE SIDE OF AGRICULTURE.

AND SOME OF THEM DO IT, ESPECIALLY THEN THAT ONE ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH AN ACTUAL ORDINANCE THROUGH CITY COUNCIL, AND IT GOT ESTABLISHED AS AN ACTUAL MARKET. RIGHT.

AND IN ACTUAL USE.

SO THIS ISN'T IMPACTING THAT? NO, IT WILL NOT. THE FOOD PERMIT, THE MOBILE FOOD UNIT PERMITS WILL, YOU KNOW, WILL BE AFFECTED BY THIS BECAUSE THAT'S PRETTY STANDARD.

YEAH. BUT THE ACTUAL FARMER'S MARKET DOES NOT.

THE PEACH STREET MARKET DOES NOT HAVE ANY IMPACT? YES. THIS IS SPECIFICALLY WHEN I WAS ON THE LIVERPOOL CENTERS AS SOMEBODY WHO IS IN THE AREA THAT WAS IMPACTED BY THE STUDY.

THEY TALKED ABOUT DIFFERENT AREAS IN TOWN TO POSSIBLY SET UP A FOOD COURT, A MOBILE FOOD COURTS.

AND THAT WAS THE OBJECTIVE, I THINK, OF THIS.

YES. THANK YOU.

GOOD POINT. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THAT AREA? OKAY. SO OTHER THAN THAT, THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE US WITH THE PERMIT, AND THAT'S ON PAGE 45 IN TERMS OF THEIR STATE LICENSING

[00:20:05]

INFORMATION, WHERE THEY'LL BE SERVICED AND THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

SO WE DO HAVE THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT LISTED THERE IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY HAVE TO BRING INTO THE CITY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AND THEN THE SIX MONTHS MAXIMUM REQUIREMENT THERE, UNLESS THEY WERE GRANTED PERMISSION BY THE CITY MANAGER THAT'S LISTED THERE ARE HIS DESIGNATE WHICH WOULD BE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

THAT'S IT IN A NUTSHELL.

LIKE I SAID, I KNOW WE RAN THROUGH IT PRETTY QUICKLY, BUT FOOD TRUCK IS A DIFFERENT I THINK USE THAT WE'RE BECOMING MORE ACCUSTOMED TO.

I MEAN, THEY GET REALLY FANCY IN TERMS OF LOBSTER MENUS ALL ACROSS THE CITY.

SO WE'VE SEEN SOME REALLY INNOVATIVE THINGS HAPPENING WITH FOOD TRUCKS.

SO THAT'S ALL WE HAVE FROM STAFF.

AND WE'LL ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THERE MAY BE SOME FOOD UNIT BUSINESSES HERE.

WE DID SEND OUT AN INVITE AND WE'LL CONTINUE TO DO THAT THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS AS IT GETS TO THE COUNCIL LEVEL.

SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU GUYS WOULD SEND THIS TO COUNCIL WITH A CONFIRM RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL THAT IT BE FINALLY ADOPTED.

THANK YOU. SO JUST TO CLARIFY, THE PRINTED VERSION OF THE AGENDA THAT I HAVE DOES NOT BEGIN WITH CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, BUT WE NEED TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS.

WE DID ADVERTISE IT THROUGH THE LEGAL PROCESS.

WE'RE GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING RIGHT NOW.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE. GOING TWICE.

PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONERS, DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? YES. SO.

YOU'RE GOING TO ISSUE PERMITS ON AN ANNUAL BASIS, BUT THEY'RE ONLY GOOD FOR SIX MONTHS.

SO THERE IS A PROCESS FOR THE ANNUAL PERMIT, CORRECT? WE CURRENTLY HAVE THAT AVAILABLE, YES.

THEY'RE INSPECTED TWICE A YEAR.

THEY INSPECTED EVERY SIX MONTHS.

YES.

ANYBODY WANT TO MAKE A I'LL MAKE A MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED MOBILE FOOD UNIT COURT TEXT AMENDMENTS AND FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO ANY RECOMMENDED CHANGES OR CONDITIONS.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND BY MS. EBY TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSAL.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

OPPOSE SAME SIGN? MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

[4. Consideration of approval of a final plat for Smart Storage, for a 12.390-acre subdivision.]

WE ARE NOW DOWN TO ITEM FOUR, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR SMART STORAGE FOR A 12.390 ACRE SUBDIVISION.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS ITEM YOU HAVE SEEN IN A PRELIMINARY PLAN APPLICATION AND YOU HAVE APPROVED THAT PRELIMINARY, WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.

THE APPLICANT HERE, AS YOU MAY RECALL, HAD REQUESTED THAT THE PLAT BE APPROVED.

CONTINGENT UPON THEM BEING ALLOWED TO SUBMIT THE UTILITY PLAN DRAINAGE PLAN, THE HERITAGE TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT, AS WELL AS THE GEOTECH REPORT.

SO THOSE THINGS ARE TYPICALLY DONE AT THE PRELIMINARY STAGE.

IT WENT TO COUNCIL, BUT COUNCIL SORT OF POINTED IT BACK TO THE FINAL PLAT PROCESS THAT THOSE ITEMS WOULD BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION.

SO THOSE ARE THE VARIANCE FOR THIS PARTICULAR PLAT.

IN WHICH WE DID TAKE THROUGH THE REVIEW PROCESS WITH THE CITY ENGINEER, THE COMMENTS THAT CAME BACK DEALT WITH THEM OF COURSE SATISFYING THE REQUIREMENTS OF AD AND ALSO THE EXTENSION OF PUBLIC UTILITIES BE SATISFIED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND THEN ALL NECESSARY VARIANCES AS APPROVED BY COUNCIL WOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLATS AS WELL.

SO PRIOR TO RED CARNATION, THESE THINGS WILL BE OF COURSE FOLLOW THROUGH ON THE FINAL PLAT BEFORE WE RECORD IT.

AND THEN PER THE CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS AND SUBMITTAL, WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THE VARIANCES ARE SATISFIED IN TERMS OF WHAT NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED.

SO WE'RE REQUESTING THAT YOU WOULD FORWARD THIS TO COUNCIL FOR A POSITIVE APPROVAL FOR THE FINAL PLAN.

FOR SMART STORAGE AND THIS IS A SUBDIVISION ON 12.39 ACRES.

[00:25:03]

COMMERCIAL GENERAL.

AND LOCATION, OF COURSE, ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF HENDERSON AND GLASS ROAD.

SO TWO LOTS YOU HAVE HERE WITH THE VARIANCE IS NOTED.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

QUESTIONS. CONCERNS.

I MOVE, WE APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT SUBJECT TO THE CITY ENGINEER COMMENTS AND APPROVE THE VARIANCE FOR THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

I HAVE A MOTION FROM MR. MUNSON AND THE SECOND BY MS. SPOOR TO APPROVE.

THE PROPOSAL.

THE FINAL PLAT. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT OTHER THAN FAVOR INDICATE.

SO BY SAYING I.

I OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

MOTION IS UNANIMOUS.

GOOD LUCK, MR. CLARK.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM FIVE.

[5. Presentation, discussion, and possible comment on a Site plan, for Angleton Park Place Sections 4-6; Presentation of Site plan, 70.838 acre tract in the southeast area of Angleton, Texas (60 ft. Lot option). No action is required.]

PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE COMMENT ON A SITE PLAN FOR ANGLETON PARK PLACE SECTIONS FOUR THROUGH SIX PRESENTATION OF SITE PLAN.

70.838 ACRE TRACT IN THE SOUTHEAST AREA OF ANGLETON, TEXAS.

60 FOOT LOT. OPTION NO ACTIONS REQUIRED.

AND I'M JUST GOING TO SAY BRIEFLY, I DON'T WANT THE COMMISSIONERS TO BE CONFUSED.

YOU DID SEE THIS ITEM LAST TIME, AND AS A RESULT OF THAT DISCUSSION, THE APPLICANT REQUESTED TO COME BACK TO YOU WITH THE REVISED PLAN, ADDRESSING SOME OF THE CONCERNS FOR YOUR INPUT. AND THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY ACTION, AS NOTED.

ALL RIGHT. I DO HAVE A REQUEST FROM A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, MR. JAMES GALE, TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS ITEM.

MR. GALE. PARDON MY VOICE.

ALLERGIES. WE'VE BEEN GOING FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS.

COME BACK SINCE WE HIT HOUSTON.

MY VOICE JUST PROBABLY COVERED EVERYTHING.

SHE JUST KEEPS TELLING ME TO STAY.

STAY GONE, YOU KNOW? THOSE ARE MOST OF YOU KNOW.

MY NAME IS CHIP GAIL.

KNOWING ABOUT WHAT'S WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED HERE, BEING THE MAJORITY LANDOWNER, THAT THIS IS GOING TO BOARD OR ME AND MY WIFE BEING THE MAJORITY LANDOWNER, THAT THIS IS GOING TO BOARD, WHICH IS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THIS TRAILER PARK THAT'S BEING PROPOSED.

I'M COMPLETELY OPPOSED TO IT.

I CAN TELL YOU, MULTIPLE PEOPLE THERE ARE TWO OTHER LANDOWNERS THAT WERE UNAWARE OF THIS THAT I TALKED TO THIS MORNING SHORTLY BEFORE HERE.

THEY WERE AT WORK. THEY COULD NOT LEAVE WORK TO EXPRESS THEIR COMPLETE OPPOSITION TO THIS AS WELL.

SURE. GIVEN MORE TIME.

AND WHEN THIS COMES A LITTLE FURTHER, THERE WILL BE A LOT MORE OPPOSITION TO IT FROM THOSE OF US ON SHANKS ROAD.

WE HAVE GREAT CONCERNS, YOU KNOW, BESIDES YOUR YOUR NORMAL CONCERNS OF ANYTHING SUCH AS INFRASTRUCTURE, WHICH THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN HAS HAS WE HAVE OUR ISSUES WITH INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER, SEWER, THOSE KIND OF DRAINAGE ISSUES.

THOSE ARE SOME MAJOR THINGS.

ROAD, FRONTAGE, CRIME STATISTICS THAT.

BE PULLED ON THE, WOULD BE PULLED ON THE PRIOR MOBILE HOME PARK.

I DID THAT ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO, AND NOBODY HAD THE INFORMATION OF HOW MUCH PUBLIC SERVICES WERE BEING UTILIZED AT THE TRAILER PARK THAT'S DOWN FROM US, WHICH IS ABOUT 500 YARDS FROM WHERE THIS ONE IS PROPOSED.

THERE ARE SO MANY ISSUES ON SHANKS ROAD, ESPECIALLY WITH ROAD TRAFFIC, AND YOU'RE GOING TO ADD 280.

MINIMUM TO I THINK IT'S 280 OR TO 88 TRAILERS.

NOW YOU'RE TALKING CARS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC.

I IMPLORE YOU TO IF YOU WANT TO SEE WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT, GETTING INTO, IF YOU WILL, COME DOWN TO SHANKS, TO THE MOBILE HOME PARK THERE, PASS ME IN THE EVENING, 10:00, YOU WILL SEE THAT IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO GET VEHICULAR TRAFFIC THROUGH THAT PARK IF THERE'S EMERGENCIES.

THE FIRE TRUCKS HAVE HAD ISSUES BEFORE TRYING TO GET THROUGH THERE.

THERE'S A HIGH VOLUME OF CALLS FOR SERVICE FROM THE PD AT THAT PARK.

ASIDE FROM THAT BEING THE LANDOWNER THAT THIS IS GOING TO BOARD.

ABOUT 50 ACRES, 50, BUT IT'S ABOUT 30, 32 ACRES OF MY PROPERTY.

IT'S GOING TO BOARD. I DON'T WANT IT.

I'VE HAD ENOUGH PROBLEMS WITH THE TRAILER PARK SOUTH OF ME WITH CATTLE BEING KILLED IN THE NINETIES FROM THAT TRAILER PARK.

PEOPLE WERE COMING THERE.

MY FENCE IS CUT.

A TOTAL DISREGARD FOR PROPERTY PERIOD FOR PEOPLE THAT OWN THE PROPERTY.

AND THE ONLY RESOLVE WE COULD EVER GET WAS BY BASICALLY, I'M JUST GOING TO TELL YOU BY LOCKING PEOPLE UP.

WHEN I STARTED CATCHING THEM ON THE PROPERTY, THERE WAS NO MORE.

YOU'RE GETTING A TRESPASS WARNING.

LOCK THEM UP. THAT IS THE ONLY THING THAT SOLVED.

[00:30:04]

THE PROBLEMS WE HAD FROM THE TRAILER PARK CROSSING OUR PROPERTY AND WE TRIED TO BE NICE ABOUT IT.

BUT WHEN WE STARTED HAVING KEVIN, THE FENCES TORN.

WE DIDN'T HAVE A CHOICE BUT TO BE UNPLEASANT PEOPLE.

I WOULD NOT BE A GOOD NEIGHBOR.

I'M GOING TO TELL YOU THAT NOW.

I DON'T WANT IT. I DON'T WANT TO DEVALUE MY PROPERTY VALUES, WHICH I BELIEVE IT WAS GOING TO DO.

I THINK YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A MASSIVE DRAINAGE ISSUE.

I KNOW THERE WAS A AN ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP THIS PRETTY RECENTLY OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS BY A HOME DEVELOPER THAT FELL THROUGH. NOW, THIS HAS COME UP WITHIN THE LAST SIX MONTHS OF THAT HOME DEVELOPMENT THAT FELL THROUGH.

AND DRAINAGE IS A MAJOR ISSUE.

THERE'S A HUGE DITCH BEHIND THIS, BUT YOU CAN'T GET ACCESS TO IT UNLESS YOU GO THROUGH OUR PROPERTY AND WE'RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW IT.

I'M JUST TELLING YOU, I THINK IF YOU HAVE MORE TIME WITH MORE NOTIFICATION, WHICH I KNOW WE WOULD EVENTUALLY GET TO, BUT I WANTED TO BE ON THE FRONT END OF YOU HEARING FROM ME NOW, NOT WAITING.

AND THEN THEN Y'ALL GOING IN A FEW MONTHS? WELL, WAIT, WHY DIDN'T ANYBODY SAY ANYTHING? I'M SAYING IT UP FRONT AND I'M SAYING IT WITH THERE ARE SEVERAL PEOPLE HERE THAT ARE NEIGHBORS OF MINE THAT WILL BOARD ACTUALLY BOARD THEIR PROPERTY, ACTUALLY COME OUT ON THE ROAD FRONTAGE IN FRONT OF ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS.

NOBODY WANTS THIS ON SHANKS.

BESIDES THE INFRASTRUCTURE PROBLEMS THAT I THINK YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE WITH THE CITY'S GOING TO HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE PROBLEMS. THE PEOPLE ON SHANKS DON'T WANT IT AND GIVEN ENOUGH TIME.

I THINK WE CAN PRODUCE ENOUGH PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE THAT WILL EXPRESS THAT OPINION.

SO I JUST WANTED YOU TO HEAR FROM ME TODAY, AND I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTION YOU HAVE CONCERNING OUR OPINION OF IT.

BUT I BELIEVE YOU'RE GOING TO GET A WHOLE LOT MORE RESISTANCE OR OPPOSITION FROM THE LANDOWNERS AND THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON SHANKS, THOSE THAT OWN PROPERTY THAT HAVE THE VESTED INTEREST IN THEIR LAND, NOT RENTING AND NOT JUST KIND OF HALF BEING PART OF OWNERSHIP. THE ACTUAL LANDOWNERS ARE THE ONES YOU'RE GOING TO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME.

THEY'RE THE PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO RESIST THIS.

AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I THINK IT'S FAIR YOU HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION UP FRONT.

SO THANK YOU, CHIP.

YES, SIR. SO BY SHOW OF HANDS, HOW MANY FOLKS ARE IN THE AUDIENCE THAT THAT ARE.

IMPACTED BY THIS PROPOSAL.

AND DO YOU ALL FEEL THE SAME WAY? OK THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

UM. THIS IS JUST A COMMENT.

AND YOUR NAME, SIR? HELLO.

MY NAME IS MIKE. I'M THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY NEXT DOOR AT ANGLETON PARK PLACE THAT WERE FIXED AND DEVELOPED.

WE'RE HOPING TO START SOMETIME IN THE NEXT 60 DAYS TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT.

WHAT'S YOUR LAST NAME? MIKE.

MIKE MORGAN. THANK YOU.

YES, SIR. SO IF YOU SEE ON THE MAP THERE OUR PROPERTY, IT'S ON THE END OF GIFFORD ROAD AND PHILLIPS ROAD.

THE FIRST THING TO SAY BASED ON HIS COMMENTS IS IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A MOBILE HOME PARK.

IT'S GOING TO BE A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION.

THERE WILL BE NO RENTAL PROPERTY ON THE PROPERTY.

THE SECOND THING IS THAT THE MOST IMPORTANT THING THAT WE'RE REALLY INTERESTED IN IS THE FIRST PIECE ON THE SHANKS ROAD AND THE GIFFORD ROAD.

WE'RE PROPOSING TO EXTEND THE ROAD.

GIFFORD ROAD, WHICH I KNOW EVENTUALLY IS GOING TO GO TO AIRPORT ROAD.

SO IF THE TRAFFIC PEOPLE THERE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT, WE DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM TO RE PROPOSE TO PUT A CUL DE SAC AT THE END AND ONLY HAVE ONE WAY TO COME IN BECAUSE IF YOU NOTICE THIS PROPERTY BUTTS UP TO ANGLETON PARK PLACE.

SO IF IT WOULD BE A DECIDING FACTOR, WE'D BE WILLING TO GIVE THE DESIGN TO WHERE THERE WOULD BE A TURNAROUND AT THE END THERE OF SHANKS ROAD AND NOT IN OR ON SHANKS ROAD AT ALL.

AND, YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL RV PARKS BUILT.

I BUILT A GULF COAST FIVE STAR RV PARK IN OYSTER CREEK, TEXAS.

IF YOU LOOK AT THAT, IT REPRESENTS HIGH END FIRST CLASS OWNED BOTTOM DOLLAR CARPET IN FREEPORT.

I'M KNOWN FOR DOING QUALITY WORK AND HIGH END THINGS.

I NAME THIS PLACE ANGLETON PARK PLACE OFF OF MONOPOLY TO REPRESENT A HIGH END PARK.

I NAME THE STREETS AFTER THAT.

WE'RE COMING BACK WITH THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TO PUT IN THERE.

NO BICYCLES IN THE FRONT, NO BROKEN DOWN CARS, THINGS LIKE THAT.

A MOWING ORDINANCE, THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO THIS IS NOT GOING TO REPRESENT ANYTHING.

THAT IS WHAT IS REPRESENTED NOW AT THE DEAD END OF THAT ROAD TO REPRESENT A MOBILE HOME PARK.

SO WHAT I'M HERE TODAY TO ASK IS TWO THINGS.

[00:35:03]

ONE IS FOR THE EXTENSION OF PERMISSION.

I KNOW THAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS THAT THE LOTS ARE 40 FOOT WIDE FOR THE ORDINANCE.

IF YOU READ IT IN YOUR ORDINANCE TODAY, I'VE DESIGNED THIS IN TWO PROPOSALS, ONE IN 50 FOOT LOTS AND ONE IN 60 FOOT LOTS, IN HOPES THAT THIS WOULD LET YOU KNOW THAT I'M TRYING TO DO SOMETHING NICE, NOT SMASH THEM ALL TOGETHER.

EVERY ONE OF THEM ARE GOING TO BE BRAND NEW MOBILE HOMES.

THE DEVELOPER THAT'S GOING TO COME IN WITH ME AS A VERY LARGE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY OUT OF ANOTHER STATE.

WE HAVE A LOT OF THINGS TO SHOW YOU GUYS OF THE PARKS THAT HAVE BEEN BUILT WITH 350 PLUS PLACES THAT THEY HAVE PREVIOUSLY HAVE FOUR OF THEM BUILT RIGHT NOW TO LET YOU SEE HOW GOOD AND WHAT QUALITY THAT WE'RE TRYING TO PUT IN HERE.

ALL THE STREETS ARE CONCRETE, AS YOU COULD TELL.

THE CITY CODE, THE FIRE TRUCKS, HE WAS TALKING ABOUT ALL THIS THING.

THERE ARE LOTS DOWN THERE, VERY SMALL.

THEY DON'T HAVE FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS TO KEEP EVERYBODY OFF THE ROADS.

ALSO, ALL OF OUR PARK, OUR SPOTS HAVE SIX CAR PARKING.

IF YOU GO DOWN OR AVAILABLE TO HAVE SIX CARS IN FRONT OF THESE LOTS, IF YOU GO TO THE OTHER PLACES DOWN THE ROAD, EACH ONE OF THEM ONLY HAVE TWO, WHICH MAKES EVERYBODY OUT IN THE STREET, THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS TO CONSIDER AS FAR AS HOW THIS IS GOING TO BE LAID OUT COMPARED TO A MOBILE HOME PARK, BECAUSE THERE WILL BE NO RENTAL UNITS, THERE WILL BE NO ALLOWED TO RENT.

IT'S GOING TO BE IN THE ORDINANCE.

THESE ARE OCCUPIED HOMEOWNERS THAT ARE GOING TO HAVE THESE PLACES.

RIGHT. THESE PEOPLE THAT ARE WITH ME OWN THE MOBILE HOME PARK TRAILERS.

THEY OWN THE INSURANCE COMPANY.

THEY OWN THE FINANCE COMPANY.

SO IT'S A ONE PLACE THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO HANDLE THE WHOLE THING.

SO IT'S GOING TO BE A GOOD THING FOR THE COMMUNITY.

THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE SHINGLE ROOF.

THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE HARDY SIDING.

THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE PERMANENTLY TIED DOWN.

SO IT'S NOT GOING TO REPRESENT LIKE ANYTHING AROUND HERE THAT WE HAVE TODAY.

AND THERE'S GOING TO BE RULES AS FAR AS THE YEAR OF THE TRAILERS, IF ANY OF THEM WAS TO BE SOLD OR MOVED OF HOW WHAT THE PRELIMINARY FIVE YEARS ARE NEWER AS ONE LEAVES OUT, THERE'S ALSO A RULE OF THE PRESSURE WASHING OF KEEPING THEM LOOKING NICE, CHECKING THE PAINT TO MAKING SURE EVERYTHING'S UP TO STANDARD, NO ROTTEN WOOD AND THAT EVERYTHING STAYS UP TO PAR TO LOOK NICE.

SO TODAY I'M ASKING FOR PERMISSION IF FOR US TO TO CONSIDER PLAN A IS IF YOU NOTICE ON THE 17 ACRES THERE AND WE HAVE THAT APPROVED AND WE'RE HOPING ANY TIME NOW WE WERE GOING TO DO PHASE ONE, WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT ANYMORE.

WE'RE GOING TO DO ALL FOUR PHASES AT ONE TIME.

SO ANGLETON PARK PLACE IS GOING TO BE ONE DEVELOPMENT IN ONE WHACK.

WE ARE GOING TO EXTEND THE ROAD DOWN TO THE PROPERTY.

AND SO IF IT IS AN ISSUE WITH THE TRAFFIC OR ANY CONCERN OF THAT, WE'RE WILLING TO PUT THAT, LIKE I STATED AT THE END TO MAKE IT WHERE IF THE.

CONCERN THEY HAVE WITH THE TRAFFIC OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

SINCE WE'RE PUTTING A BRAND NEW ROAD THERE, WE COULD HAVE ONE ENTRANCE GOING IN THERE.

THE SECOND REASON I'M HERE IS THE PROPERTY, AS YOU KNOW, IS TWO DIFFERENT LOTS.

I'M PROPOSING TO BUY THE WHOLE PROPERTY.

AND IF IT WOULD BE CONSIDERED, I WOULD LIKE TO CONSIDER THE SAME THING.

AND I WOULD AT THIS POINT, I WOULD PROPOSE TO DEVELOP BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD.

RIGHT NOW, I'M IN FOR ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD.

IF WE COULD WORK SOMETHING OUT TO WHERE WE COULD DO THE SAME THING ON THE BACK HALF OF THE PROPERTY, THEN WE WOULD EXTEND THE BOTH SIDES OF THE ROAD.

LEGALLY, WE'RE ENTITLED TO ONLY DEVELOP ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD.

AS FAR AS THE DEVELOPER, WE WOULD BE WILLING TO DEVELOP THE OTHER SIDE OF THE EXISTING ANGLETON PARK PLACE AND RUN IT ALL THE WAY DOWN, WHICH MEANS NOW GIFFORD WOULD BE A FULL ROAD, DEVELOPED ALL THE WAY TO THE END OF THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT THERE.

WHEN I SAY THAT I'M TALKING.

MR. MORGAN, CAN WE HAVE A QUESTION NOW? I UNDERSTAND THE OWNERSHIP'S GOING TO BE ON THE MOBILE HOMES.

THEY'RE GOING TO OWN THEM.

BUT THE LOTS THEMSELVES YOU'RE PROPOSING TO RENT, SO YOU'RE SELLING THE LOT? YES. SO YOU'RE SELLING ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE THE MOBILE HOMES ON THE LOT? YOU HAVE A DEALERSHIP AND THEN YOU'RE GOING TO SELL THE LOT? YES, MA'AM. IT'S A LAND HOME.

NO. THERE'S NO RENTAL LOTS.

THERE'S NO. WELL, JUST IN OUR THE WAY THAT WAS PROPOSED TO US WAS IT WAS FOR RENTAL.

WAS IT A MOBILE HOME PARK OR A MANUFACTURED HOME PARK? IT'S A MANUFACTURED HOME SUBDIVISION.

IT'S NOT THAT'S KIND OF SIMILAR TO WHAT JAY BROCKMAN TRIED TO DO OVER THE DOUBLE WAS.

RIGHT. SO YOURS WAS 60 FOOT ARE GOING TO BE MORE OF A DOUBLE WIDE WHERE IT'S NOT A SINGLE, SINGLE WIDE WOULD YOU THINK OR YOU DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM PUTTING DOUBLE WIDES IF THAT.

NO PROBLEM ON THE ON THAT AS FAR AS IF WITH THIS NEW DEVELOPMENT.

YES, MA'AM. THAT WOULD BE NO PROBLEM.

WELL, WHAT I GUESS MY QUESTION WOULD BE THEN YOU'RE JUST GOING TO FURNISH YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD A NEIGHBORHOOD AND YOU'RE GOING TO PUT MOBILE HOMES ON THEM, AND THEN PEOPLE WILL COME AND BUY THE LOT AND THE MOBILE MODULAR HOMES.

BUT. YES, MA'AM. MODULAR?

[00:40:02]

YES, MA'AM. OH, THIS IS THIS GOING TO REQUIRE ANY ZONING CHANGES? SO MOBILE, THERE'S NO WILLS OR NO TONGUE.

AND SO CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY'S IN THE IT'S NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS.

SO IT WOULD REQUIRE THE ANNEXATION.

WE TALKED ABOUT THAT LAST TIME.

AND THEY YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD I'M SURE YOU WOULD WANT CITY SERVICES.

AND THEN THE OTHER DEAL IS IF YOU TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE FOUNDATION WITH THESE BEYOND THE PERMANENT FOUNDATION, ACCORDING TO THE SINGLE FAMILY CODE, BECAUSE THAT MAKES A DIFFERENCE IF IT'S A MODULAR SITUATION.

AND WHILE YOU WERE SAYING THAT, LIKE I SAID, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO THINGS TODAY.

ONE WOULD BE PLAN A, AND THE OTHER ONE IS PLAN B.

IF ONE SIDE OF THE STREET IS IN THE CITY LIMITS, IT'S APPROXIMATELY THE SAME SIZE LOT AS THE ONE I HAVE NOW.

AND THE OTHER SIDE, THE SAME OWNER OWNS BOTH LOTS AND THEY'RE PROPOSING TO ONLY SELL IT TOGETHER IN ONE LOT.

WE'RE NOT OPPOSED TO STILL BUYING IT AND HOLDING ON TO THIS AND FIGURE WHAT WE WOULD DO WITH THAT.

SO WE'RE HERE TODAY FOR TWO REASONS.

ONE IS TO CONSIDER THE SMALLER SIDE THERE THAT IS IN THE CITY LIMITS, THAT HAS CITY WATER AND SEWER.

AND THE OTHER OTHER QUESTION WOULD BE, IS THE PART ON THE BACK SIDE TO CONSIDER FOR THE ANNEXATION? SO MR. MORGAN ON MY AGENDA SAYS PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE COMMENT.

WE'RE NOT I MEAN WE'RE MAKING COMMENT TO YOU ON OUR FEELINGS ABOUT WHAT YOU'VE PROPOSED.

AND SO I WOULD ASK THE COMMISSIONERS IF THEY HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE OR COMMENTS TO OFFER TO MR. MORGAN HAVE A QUESTION IN THE COMING.

DO YOU PROPOSE TO HAVE AN HOA THERE? YES, SIR. RIGHT NOW, ME AND ME AND I HAVEN'T MET OTIS, BUT I SPOKE TO YOU.

I'M THE GUY WHO'S BEEN SPEAKING ON THE PHONE.

OTIS NEW TOOK OVER WALTER'S PLACE, SO I'VE BEEN SPEAKING WITH HIM RIGHT NOW.

THE EXISTING ONE THAT'S BEEN APPROVED IS IN THE HANDS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY.

NOW TO. WE'RE NEGOTIATING THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT NOW.

AND INSIDE THAT, WHEN IT STATES THE THINGS THAT I JUST MENTIONED THAT WOULD WOULD APPLY TO THIS.

WELL, WHAT? WHAT ARE YOU.

I'M SORRY. WELL, HE HAD A COMMENT.

I DIDN'T MEAN TO INTERRUPT. WELL, MY COMMENT IS I THINK THAT YOU HAVE A HARD ROW TO HOE TO GET THIS DONE.

JUST MY OPINION.

I'M NOT GOING TO SAY I'M FOR OR AGAINST IT.

I'M JUST SAYING KNOWING THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE.

TEMPERATURE. IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGH FOR YOU TO DO IT.

AND I'VE BEEN IN TOUGH SITUATIONS MANY TIMES.

SO I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU GUYS WHEN YOU HAVE ME.

ALL RIGHT, EBY MY QUESTION.

I HAVE A QUESTION AND A COMMENT.

I GUESS THE QUESTION IS, WHAT KIND OF PRICING ARE YOU LOOKING AT ON TO BUY A UNIT AND A SO THAT'S ANOTHER GOOD DELIVERY THAT I CAN BRING TO TO THE AREA. I'M GLAD YOU BROUGHT THAT UP.

SO OUR PRICE RANGE IS GOING TO BE BETWEEN 165 AND 195 PER LOT.

SO I KNOW NOBODY ELSE HERE HAS ANYTHING LIKE THAT FOR LOW INCOME HOUSING.

SO WE THESE ARE NOT GOING TO REPRESENT LOW HOA FEE.

ON TOP OF THAT, THEY'RE LIKE $35 AS WE'RE NEGOTIATING THAT NOW.

BUT IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A LARGE FEE AS FAR AS THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION.

AND Y'ALL, MAYBE Y'ALL CAN HELP ME REMEMBER.

BUT I REMEMBER ON THE LAST ONE THAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS, DEB SAID, I DID.

THEY MENTIONED THAT THEY HAD SENT OUT LETTERS.

IT SEEMS LIKE DEB SAID, I'D BE CURIOUS TO KNOW WHAT THE NEIGHBORS THINK ABOUT THIS PROJECT WHEN IT COMES UP.

SO I GUESS AS A AS A COMMENT.

YOU'RE HEARING WHAT SOME OF THE NEIGHBORS THINK ABOUT THIS.

SO THAT WAS MY PROPOSED QUESTION.

I ASKED MIGUEL WHAT RIGHT NOW DO YOU SHOW THAT THIS IS ZONED OUT? WHAT DOES THAT BECAUSE IT'S A DIFFERENT LETTERS THAT ARE ON THAT LAND.

AND I WAS I'D LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THAT REPRESENTS IN THE IS NOT ZONE.

IS THAT CORRECT? DUNCAN ABOUT THE ONE THAT'S IN THE CITY LIMITS. NOW, THE ONE ON THE LEFT, THE GRAPHIC ON THE LEFT IS SOMEONE IN ONE OF THOSE HOLDING DISTRICTS THAT GOT IN THERE, AND IT'S CALLED P.D..

SOME OF OUR P.D. ORDINANCES HAVE AN ORDINANCE ON IT AND IT TELLS YOU WHAT TO DO.

SO ZONING WILL BE REQUIRED ON THAT TRACK TO THE LEFT.

AND THIS WAS A PART OF YOUR RITUAL.

I HAVE A QUESTION.

LAST TIME WE DISCUSSED THIS, YOU ASK WHAT WOULD BE AMENABLE OR NOT.

AND I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT YOU BROUGHT IT BACK WITH 60 FOOT FRONTS.

WHAT ARE THE DEPTHS ON THESE LOTS? THERE ARE 125.

CRAIG WILL. I ALSO HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION THAT'S NOT REALLY TO YOU SPECIFICALLY, BUT ABOUT THIS.

DISCUSS THIS OVER AND OVER ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN.

[00:45:04]

THE NUMBER OF WATER AND SEWER TAPS THAT IT'S GOING TO TAKE TO HANDLE THE ALREADY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT.

PLUS ADDING THESE IN AND THEN THEM ASKING US TO ANNEX IN THE LARGER PROPORTION.

IS THIS CITY CAPABLE OF.

SO THERE'D BE TWO QUESTIONS.

WOULD THEY BE CAPABLE OF HANDLING THE LEFT SIDE AND THEN WOULD THEY BE ABLE TO HANDLE BOTH OF.

YEAH, THERE HAS BEEN NO CAPACITY AGAINST STUDY OF THIS PARTICULAR PROPOSAL AND WE TYPICALLY WOULD RUN THAT THROUGH THE ENGINEERS AND THEY WILL DO THE NUMBERS.

BUT IF THE QUESTION IS, IS ARE WE OVERCAPACITY FOR NO MORE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, I WOULD SAY NO.

BUT YEAH, CAPACITY WOULD HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH.

YOU'RE CORRECT, BECAUSE THE REASON I KEEP GOING BACK TO THIS, BECAUSE EVEN BONNIE IN THE DISCUSSION LAST MONTH WAS THE SAME THING.

WE'RE LOOKING AT ALL OF THIS HITTING OUR ONE PLANT OVER HERE.

AND IT'S NOT JUST SOUTH OF TOWN THAT I'M TALKING ABOUT, BUT WE'VE GOT ALL OF THIS DEVELOPMENT THAT HAS BEEN APPROVED.

AND AS THEY BRING IT ON TO THE BOOKS, WE'RE ABOUT TO PUT THAT PLANT IN HIGH CAPACITY.

CHANCES ARE OVERLOAD.

AND I HAVE A PROBLEM.

I FEEL LIKE I NEED TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE THAT ARE ALREADY LIVING HERE MORE THAN I DO THE DEVELOPMENT UNTIL SOMETHING CAN BE BROUGHT ON TO THE BOOKS TO HANDLE THOSE THINGS.

AND. I LIVED DOWN THERE FOR YEARS, SO I KNOW WHAT THE SEWER ISSUES WERE FOR YEARS, AND IT TOOK A LONG TIME BEFORE THOSE GOT IRONED OUT.

THAT WHEN IT HEAVY RAINS, THAT SEWER DIDN'T BACK UP IN PEOPLE'S BATHTUBS, ETC..

AND I HATE TO SEE US GET THAT PART OF OUR CITY BACK IN THAT TWIST.

AND THAT'S NUMBER ONE BIG CONCERN OF MINE.

AND I AGREE WITH MR. GAYLE. YOU'RE PUTTING A LOT OF HIGH DENSITY, WHICH WE ALREADY GOT DOWN THERE ON THOSE.

WHILE YOU'RE BUILDING A NEW GIFFORD FOR YOUR STRETCH.

OLD GIFFORD AND OLD SHANKS ARE TWO NARROW LANES ROAD THAT ARE SEEING HIGH CAPACITY.

AND I HAVE A REAL PROBLEM WITH THAT.

MR. GAYLE, DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT OR A QUESTION? YES, SIR. IF I MAY APPROACH SO THAT YOU MAY.

ALTHOUGH TAKE THE MICROPHONE WITH YOU, IF YOU DON'T MIND.

THANK YOU. I'M SURE THIS GENTLEMAN IS A NICE GUY.

I'VE NEVER MET HIM. I'M SURE HE IS.

I DOUBT HE'LL BE LIVING IN THE TRAILER PARK AND THE DEVELOPMENT, WHATEVER WE WANT TO CALL IT.

JUST SO EVERYBODY WILL UNDERSTAND SOMETHING.

THIS IS A DITCH RIGHT HERE.

OKAY, SHANKS ROAD IS HERE.

THIS IS A DITCH.

AND THIS IS COUNTY.

I'M CURIOUS TO KNOW IF COUNTY HAS ANY INVOLVEMENT IN WHAT'S GOING TO BE DEVELOPED OUT HERE.

I CAN TELL YOU, 30 YEARS AGO, THERE WAS A THEY TRIED TO GET THIS DEVELOP THIS DITCH HERE FROM GIFFORD ALL THE WAY DOWN TO 220. AND BECAUSE THE DITCH IT HAD TO DO WITH COUNTY, IT COULD NOT BE A ROAD COULD NOT BE EXTENDED FROM GIFFORD TO 220 OK. SO THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.

I KNOW WE KEEP HEARING TALKING ABOUT CLOSING IT HERE AND COMING OUT HERE.

I DON'T SEE HOW THAT IS POSSIBLE, BUT I KNOW OR I'M CONCERNED.

THERE IS ANOTHER ISSUE BESIDES THAT WITH THIS DITCH, WHICH IS A DITCH BEING TURNED INTO A ROADWAY.

I DON'T KNOW IF IT CAN EVEN HAPPEN.

YOU CAN SEE ONE OF MY CONCERNS WITH THE PLAT THAT YOU'VE BEEN PRESENTED.

IT'S NOT EVEN AN ACTUAL ACCURATE PLAT.

I OWN THIS.

I DON'T OWN THIS, SO I DON'T KNOW WHY.

HOW OLD THIS IS? THE GALES HAVE NOT OWNED THIS SINCE 1973.

SO I DON'T KNOW HOW OLD THIS PLAT IS TO WHERE YOU HAVE A LOT OF HERE THAT IS ALREADY INFRASTRUCTURE, BUT IT'S NOT SHOWING UP ON THE PLAT ITSELF, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

I HOPE THAT MAKES SENSE TO YOUR BODY.

SO I KNOW THIS IS PROBABLY AT LEAST FROM 1973 FOR US TO BE LISTED HERE.

THE INFRASTRUCTURE I'M GOING TO TELL YOU SO YOU'LL KNOW WE HAD A PROBLEM.

WE DIDN'T HAVE PROBLEMS. MY NEIGHBOR KAREN HAD A PROBLEM THAT ULTIMATELY ENDED UP BACKING UP THE SEWER BACK INTO HER HOUSE.

SHE HAS A SPECIAL NEEDS CHILD.

I THINK THE CITY SETTLED AN ISSUE WITH THAT, AND IT'S NOW BEEN TAKEN CARE OF.

I WOULD LIKE TO SAY THAT THERE IS A SEWER PIPE THAT STICKS OUT OF THE DITCH IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE, AND THERE'S A FOUR INCH PIPE STICKS OUT OF THE FRONT OF THE DITCH IN MY HOUSE.

[00:50:01]

AFTER SEVERAL TIMES OF CITY WORKERS GOING BACK TO MY HOUSE, THEY PUT TRY TO FLUSH OUT SEWAGE FROM MY PIPE TO THE ROAD.

AND THERE WAS A PROBLEM AT THE ROAD, BACKED UP SEWAGE INTO MY HOUSE, MY TWO WEEK OLD HOUSE.

I CUSTOM BUILT THIS HOUSE, BACKED UP THE SEWER, SO I HAD TO GO THROUGH ALL THAT MESS.

THEN THEY FINALLY FIXED THE ISSUE, SUPPOSEDLY PUT A PIPE IN AND THE PIPES PURPOSE PER THE CITY WORKERS IS SOMETIMES THE SEWAGE IS REAL BAD. AND THIS SIDE OF TOWN, IF ONE DAY THE SEWAGE BACKS UP INTO YOUR HOUSE, TAKE THE TOP OFF AND LET IT FLOW INTO THE DITCH.

THIS HAPPENS AND A LOT OF OLD PARTS OF THE CITY.

THAT'S WHAT WE RECOMMEND HAPPENS.

ALL RIGHT. SO I THINK WE'RE ALL HERE.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE NEIGHBORS HAVE GOT CONCERNS ABOUT THIS PROJECT.

THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE SOME CONCERNS ABOUT GENERAL CAPACITY OF THE SOUTH SIDE OF OF OUR COMMUNITY AND OUR CHARGE TODAY IS TO PROVIDE COMMENT.

AND I THINK BETWEEN BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS AND THE COMMISSIONERS, I THINK WE'VE DONE THAT.

MY RECOMMENDATION TO YOU WOULD BE TO MEET YOUR POTENTIAL NEW NEIGHBORS AND TALK TO THEM AND AND HEAR THEIR CONCERNS.

AND IF THIS GOES FORWARD.

ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS BUT I THINK AT THE SAME TIME, WE HAVE CONCERNS FOR CITY STAFF TO ASSURE THAT WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT CREATING A LARGER PROBLEM FOR THE LARGER COMMUNITY DOWN THE ROAD.

SO THEY'RE WILLING TO AGREE WITH THAT.

YES. ALL RIGHT.

SO THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE AND FOR PARTICIPATING.

A QUESTION FOR YOU ON THAT.

WELL, I'M SORRY, BUT BUT WE'RE NOT HERE.

WE'RE HERE TO PROVIDE COMMENT AND WE'VE DONE THAT.

AND SO IF YOU'D LIKE TO MEET WITH US PRIVATELY OR CITY STAFF PRIVATELY AFTER THIS MEETING, FEEL FREE.

BUT WE SPENT ALMOST 30 MINUTES ON THIS ISSUE AND I'M READY TO MOVE ON.

YES, FAIR ENOUGH. THANK YOU.

ITEM SIX PRESENTATION, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE COMMENT ON A POTENTIAL REZONING REQUEST FOR A POTENTIAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SITE LOCATED ON

[6. Presentation, discussion, and possible comment on a potential Rezoning Request, for a potential industrial development site located on 15.482 vacant acres on the North side of Hwy. 220, east of Shanks Road, for property currently zoned PD District. No action is required.]

15.482 VACANT ACRES ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 220, EAST OF SHANKS ROAD FOR PROPERTY CURRENTLY ZONED PD DISTRICT.

NO ACTION IS REQUIRED.

JUST INTRODUCING THIS FINAL ITEM.

APPLICANT TODAY WOULD JUST LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE COMMISSION FOR A POTENTIAL REZONING.

AS NOTED, THIS PROPERTY IS ON HIGHWAY 220 WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR A LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TYPE USE.

SO THE APPLICANT I WOULD ASSUME THAT MR. ROBERT CAMPBELL. MR. CAMPBELL, YOU'RE WELCOME TO APPROACH THE PODIUM AND MAKE YOUR PLEASE BRIEF PRESENTATION.

WHY, THANK YOU GUYS FOR ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK.

MY NAME IS ROBERT CAMPBELL AND WE ARE IN PROCESS OF PURCHASING OR THE BUSINESS THAT I WORK FOR IS IN PROCESS OF PURCHASING THE PROPERTY THAT MR. SPRIGGS BROUGHT UP.

IT IS CURRENTLY ZONED AS PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AND IT'S IN THE FURTHEST SOUTH EASTERN CORNER OF THE CITY LIMITS.

AND WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF BUYING.

LIKE I MENTIONED, WE CLOSED ON THE 16TH ON THIS PROPERTY AND WE'RE LOOKING TO HAVE IT REZONED AS LIGHT INDUSTRIAL.

WE ARE A METAL FABRICATION BUSINESS CURRENTLY IN CLUTE AND WE ARE GROWING AND FLOURISHING, SO WE'RE LOOKING TO MOVE INTO A LARGER PROPERTY. WE'RE GOING TO BUILD A WE WOULD LIKE TO BUILD A 50 BY 200 FOOT SHOP TOWARDS THE FRONT PART OF THAT PROPERTY CLOSER TO 220. AND I THINK THERE'S.