[00:00:01] LIKE TO CALL THE MEETING TO EXCUSE ME CALL A MEETING TO ORDER. [DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER] WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 21ST, AT NOON. IN ATTENDANCE IS MICHELLE TOWNSEND, JAMIE SCHWARTZ. DANIELLE GRAHAM. TERRY ROBERTS, BLAINE SMITH. ALLISON IS ELLEN EBY. AND THE FIRST ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO HOLD ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS. I'D LIKE TO ASK THAT WE ENTERTAIN TABLING THAT ITEM UNTIL OUR NEXT MEETING SO THAT WE CAN GO AHEAD AND GET TO THESE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ACCEPT A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO. DO THAT TO POSTPONE THAT DECISION? WELL, SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSED MOTION CARRIED. NEXT ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES. HAS THE BOARD HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE MINUTES? I HAVE THE QUESTION. THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD WAS THE DATE. UH, ON THE END OF IT. AND IT PUT TODAY'S DATE. AND ACTUALLY, THAT WAS LAST YEAR'S DATE. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN LAST YEAR'S. YEAH, THAT'S THE ONLY THING I'VE NEEDED CHANGED. I BELIEVE THERE WAS ALSO A NAME SPELLING. BELINDA GAINES NAME WAS MISSPELLED AND MY NAME WAS MISSPELLED. NAME WAS ALSO MISSPELLED. YES. SO NOTED. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE MINUTES. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? I OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. AND YEAH, JUST FOR CORRECTION ON THAT OR FOR UNDERSTANDING ON THE MINUTES, WHAT WE HAVE TO DO IS ONCE THEY GET APPROVED, WE GET THEM SIGNED. SO THE REASON WHY TODAY'S DATE IS REPRESENTED IS WE HAVE TO HAVE THE SECRETARY ENDORSE IT ONCE YOU GUYS APPROVE IT. SO I APOLOGIZE IF THAT'S CONFUSING, BUT WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT THOSE DATES ALIGN IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU. WE DO HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED FOR TODAY. [PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ACTION ITEMS] I WOULD ASK THAT WE CONSIDER SWITCHING THE ORDER OF THEM AND CONDUCT AGENDA ITEM FOUR PRIOR TO AGENDA ITEM THREE. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT THAT. A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? I OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. SO THAT MOVES US TO ITEM FOUR, WHICH IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 23 DASH 15, DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES IN THE FRONT YARDS OF THE MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY AND ANGLETON PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION. NUMBER THREE IS. I'M SORRY, I READ THE OTHER ONE. YEAH, READ THE OTHER ONE. OH, YOU'RE RIGHT. I'M SO SORRY. I'M SO SORRY. PLEASE FORGIVE. THANK YOU. AND IF YOU DON'T MIND PULLING YOUR MIC DOWN. OH, SURE. OKAY. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 28 DASH 101.1 PARKING LOT PAVING REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONTINUED USE OF AN EXISTING COMPACTED GRAVEL LOT FOR THE PROPOSED SECTION CONTAINER PARK USE. I HOPE I PRONOUNCE THAT RIGHT. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 509 WEST MULBERRY STREET, HIGHWAY 35, ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF COLUMBIA STREET INTERSECTION. I'D ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL SECOND. MOTION FOR THIS FIRST ONE. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THAT UP. I BELIEVE WE HAVE A SECOND. A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. WE NOW ASK THAT CITY STAFF ADDRESS. CERTAINLY. THANK YOU, ACTING CHAIR. WE HAVE THIS PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 28 DASH 101 AS IT RELATES TO PARKING LOT SURFACING ON COMMERCIAL PARKING LOTS. THIS IS A REQUEST BEING BROUGHT TO YOU BY. AS AS SHE STATED, THE SHAKE SHACK. AND WE DO APOLOGIZE AS WE STATED IF WE MISPRONOUNCE IT, BUT IT'S BASICALLY A CONTAINER PARK AND FOOD COURT IDEA THAT IT'S BEEN PRESENTED TO THE CITY. I WILL SAY THAT THE CITY HAS WORKED ON OUR ORDINANCE AS IT RELATES TO FOOD, TRUCK, FOOD, TRUCK COURTS. BUT THIS IS SIMILAR IN NATURE, BUT IT'S NOT NECESSARILY A FOOD TRUCK COURT PER SE, BUT THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO CREATE A PARK FOR A FAMILY SETTING THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR FOOD, [00:05:05] ENTERTAINMENT, AREAS OF PLAY FOR THE CHILDREN AND WHAT HAVE YOU. SO WE REVISED THE STAFF REPORT FROM WHAT THIS SAID. AND IF YOU DON'T MIND GOING TO THE POWERPOINT THAT WE WILL KIND OF FLOW THROUGH IT. BUT WHAT HE'S REQUESTING IS THAT HE COULD RETAIN THE EXISTING PARKING LOT SURFACING AS IT EXISTS TODAY, AND IT HAS BEEN SERVED SERVICING SOME PREVIOUS USES ON THE PROPERTY, SUCH AS THE BEER GARDEN. YOU CAN KEEP FLIPPING THERE, BUT THIS WILL SHOW SOME OF THAT PAVEMENT AND COMPACTED AREA ON THE SITE. AND IT BASICALLY THE GRASS HAS GROWN THROUGH MOST OF IT. BUT HE'S ASKING THAT FOR THIS PARTICULAR USE, WHICH WOULD BE WITH THE LIGHTS AND WHAT HAVE YOU. THERE ARE SOME LEVEL OF FENCING THAT THEY'VE INSTALLED, BUT IT'S BASICALLY TO BE FOR ENTERTAINMENT AND RECREATIONAL USES FOR FOOD. IT'LL BE A GOOD SETTING FOR THAT SEGMENT OF THE COMMUNITY AS WELL. BUT THESE ARE JUST SOME VIEWS SHOWING THAT PARKING LOT. SO HE'S REQUESTING THAT VARIANCE, AS WE STATED AND STAFF HAS LOOKED AT THE VARIANCE REQUIREMENTS JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING AREA AND THAT SOMETIMES THE CODE CAN CAUSE SOME DIFFICULTY IN SATISFYING THE REQUIREMENTS DUE TO CERTAIN RESTRAINTS AND WHAT HAVE YOU. SO ALL OF THOSE CRITERIA HAS BEEN WEIGHED FOR YOUR FINDINGS OF FACT. AND JUST TO DETERMINE THAT AN UNDUE HARDSHIP IS FOUND IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, ACCORDING TO SECTION 2823 IN THE ZONING CODE OF ORDINANCES. NOW, WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE ALLOWED FOR TWO CONDITIONS ON THE SITE JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE IS SOME ORDERLY IN TERMS OF THE THE GRAVEL AREA. SO NUMBER ONE, THAT THEY SHALL PROVIDE PARKING BLOCKS AND REPLACE THE COMPACTED GRAVEL IN CHAD AS NEEDED IN THE AREAS AND THEN ESTABLISH THE PARKING SPOT LOCATION. SO THIS WOULD CREATE SOME ORGANIZED SECTION ON THE CIRCULATION. AND THE SECOND ONE IS THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO BE PARKING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY OF HIGHWAY 35, WHICH IS MULBERRY STREET, BECAUSE OF VISIBILITY AND CLEARANCE CLEARANCE STANDARDS. SO THOSE ARE THE ONLY CONDITIONS THAT WE WOULD RECOMMEND ANY MOTION BE BASED ON. SO YOU CAN HAVE THE APPLICANT COME UP AND EXPLAIN THE CONCEPT AT THIS TIME. I'M DONE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COULD I HAVE THE APPLICANT ADDRESS THE BOARD? IS THE APPLICANT PRESENT. SO APPARENTLY THE APPLICANT IS NOT HERE, BUT WE CAN MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENTS OR ANY QUESTIONS OF THE OF THE BOARD. IS THERE ANYBODY WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD REGARDING THIS MATTER EITHER IN FAVOR OR AGAINST? SO I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE HEARING. SECOND, ALL IN FAVOR. I OPPOSED MOTION CARRIED. SO THE PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED AND WE ARE FREE TO DISCUSS. ANY CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE AMONGST OURSELVES. ANYBODY HAVE ANY? CONCERNS. OTHER THAN THE TWO RECOMMENDATIONS BY STAFF? NO. DO WE ALL FEEL THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN ADJUSTMENT? BASED ON WHAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO MEET. SO I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO ACCEPT THE ADJUSTMENT AS STATED PROVIDING THAT WE. THOSE TWO ADJUSTMENTS WOULD BE HELPFUL. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATIONS. SECOND, THE CODE OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND THE SECTION 28.23. I. ALL IN FAVOR ARE OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. THANK YOU. OKAY. NOW WE'D GO TO THE RIGHT ONE THAT I WAS AT A MINUTE AGO. SO ITEM FOUR WILL BE TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARING, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SECTION 2315 DRAINAGE AND UTILITIES REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE PLACEMENT OF UTILITIES IN THE FRONT YARDS OF THE MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY. INGLETON PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION SECTIONS ONE AND 271 LOTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 20 3-1 33 AS REQUIRED BY TNP. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT EAST PHILIPS ROAD NEAR GIFFORD ROAD. [00:10:03] I WOULD LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVE SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. I'D ASK THAT THE CITY STAFF ADDRESS. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. AND YOU MAY GO TO THE POWERPOINT. THANK YOU. THIS PARTICULAR CASE, AS YOU NOTED, IS A REQUEST BY ANGLETON. PARK PLACE SUBDIVISION. THIS IS A MOBILE, A MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY. EXCUSE ME. IT'S NOT A MOBILE HOME PARK BY NATURE. IT IS A SITE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY REZONED BY THE CITY. SO HISTORICALLY, THERE ARE PLANTS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR THIS TRACK, AS WELL AS THE ZONING IS IN PLACE, AND IT IS A PERMITTED USE ON THE PROPERTY. MIKE MORGAN IS REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENTS WOULD CONSIDER HIS VARIANCE REQUESTS BASED ON A REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY TO PLACE THE UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY AND PLACE THE UTILITIES ON THE GROUND IN THE REAR. UNFORTUNATELY, AS STATED, THEY WENT THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS IT, IT GOT APPROVED. NOW THEY'RE UNDER CONSTRUCTION TO DO THE IMPROVEMENTS AND ALL OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THAT HAVE TO BE DONE ON THE SITE. AND HE'S ASKING FOR A VARIANCE OF THE SECTION DUE TO SOME REQUIREMENTS BY TEXAS, NEW MEXICO, PER THE UTILITIES, THEY ARE STATING THAT THEY WILL NOT INSTALL THOSE UTILITIES IN THE REAR DUE TO SAFETY ISSUES AND DUE TO PROXIMITY ON THE LOT. AND THEY INSIST THAT HE PUT THE UTILITIES IN THE FRONT. SO BY NATURE THIS WOULD CAUSE HIM TO HAVE THAT HARDSHIP FOR CONSIDERATION BY YOU. IF YOU DON'T MIND GOING TO THE NEXT SLIDE, WE'LL SORT OF LOOK AT SOME OF THE AIR. SO THIS IS THE ZONING MAP. JUST TO LET YOU KNOW WHAT I JUST SAID IS ZONED. MH FOR MODULAR HOMES OR MANUFACTURED HOMES, THE PROPERTY HERE AND IT WAS ONCE CALLED, I THINK PHILIPS MANUFACTURED HOMES, I THINK PRIOR TO IT BEING NAMED ANGLETON PARK PLACE, AS I SAW SOME CORRESPONDENCE BY THE BY MY PREDECESSOR AS A PART OF THIS PROPERTY, THEY HAVE APPROVED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION ON GIFFARD ROAD TO ACCESS IN THE FUTURE FOR THE SECOND PHASE THAT YOU'LL SEE IN THE SECOND HERE AND ALSO THE ACCESS OFF OF PHILIPS. IF YOU WOULD FLIP TO THE NEXT SLIDE AND THIS IS WHAT I JUST SAID REGARDING THE REQUIREMENTS OF 10 P.M. MP THAT IS FOR THEIR REQUIREMENTS STATING THAT THEY WOULD NOT INSTALL THOSE IN THE REAR DUE TO THE UNSAFE AND ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES AND ANYTHING WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND THEN ZERO LOT LINES AND SUBDIVISIONS WITH LOTS LESS THAN 50 FEET. LET'S GO TO THE NEXT SLIDE. THIS IS THE SUBDIVISION THAT WAS BROUGHT BEFORE SECTION ONE IS WHAT HE'S WORKING ON AT THIS TIME. JUST TO GIVE YOU A LAY OF THE SUBDIVISION AND THEN IF YOU WOULD JUST MOVE FORWARD. MOST OF THE LOTS ARE 55 FEET WIDE, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PIE SHAPED LOTS. THIS IS JUST THE PARTICULARS OF THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY THAT USUALLY ARE MET ON SUBDIVISIONS. AND IF YOU WOULD KEEP MOVING AND THIS IS JUST A GRAPHIC SHOWING THOSE EASEMENTS IN THE REAR OF YOUR TYPICAL LOT. AND JUST A FEW PHOTOGRAPHS. THIS IS, OF COURSE, SHOWING WHERE GIFFORD ROAD. IAN'S HEADING SOUTH. THE PROPERTY WOULD BE OVER TO YOUR RIGHT OF THE RIGHT OF WAY. AND THESE ARE JUST SOME VIEWS LOOKING OFF OF THE PHILLIPS ROAD ACCESS ONTO THE PROPERTY. SOME OF THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES THERE. SO THIS IS JUST A RECOMMENDATION TO ALLOW FOR THE UTILITY PLACEMENT IN THE FRONT YARD FOR INGLETON PARK PLACE. SECTIONS ONE AND TWO FOR 71 LOTS. THAT'S ALL THAT WE HAVE FROM STAFF, AND WE'LL MOVE FORWARD AND ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I HAVE TWO PEOPLE THAT WISH TO ADDRESS THE BOARD, MR. JAMES GALE. GOOD AFTERNOON. I APPRECIATE YOU LETTING ME ADDRESS THE BOARD. I KNOW YOU GUYS HAVE A TOUGH JOB. I'M ASSUMING YOU CAN HEAR ME. I KNOW YOU HAVE A TOUGH JOB, BUT I THINK SOMETIMES WE LOSE A LITTLE SIGHT OF THE BIGGER PICTURE HERE. I KNOW YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO ONLY VOTE ON WHETHER THERE'S A VARIANCE FOR THE UTILITY TO BE REMOVED, BUT LET ME TELL YOU, THIS WAS PART OF A BIGGER TRAILER PARK THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BECOME A 288 SLOT TRAILER PARK. IT IS OUR BELIEF AND YOU HAVE SIX LANDOWNERS PRESENT. [00:15:01] I HAVE FOUR MORE LANDOWNERS THAT COULD NOT BE HERE TODAY DUE TO WORK, AND THEY'VE ASKED ME TO SPEAK ON THEIR BEHALF THAT DO NOT WANT THIS IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM. WE'VE SPOKEN TO CITY COUNCIL, WE'VE SPOKEN TO PLANNING AND ZONING ABOUT THE FULL MOBILE HOME TRAILER PARK. NOW, WITH WHAT THIS GENTLEMAN SAID ON THE LEFT, I'M SORRY, I DON'T KNOW YOU PERSONALLY THAT THIS SOUNDS LIKE THAT THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED TO COME TO FRUITION. IF THIS HAPPENS, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER TRAILER PARK THAT WILL BE ADJOINED TO THIS ONE THAT THEN PROCEEDS TO AFFECT ALL OF OUR LAND. AND ONE OF THE GENTLEMEN, THIS TRAILER PARK EFFECTS THAT LAND. NOW. I'M TRYING TO I TRY TO MAKE IT AS SHORT AS I CAN, BUT THE IMPACT THAT THIS CAN PRODUCE, I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY'S THOUGHT ABOUT IT, BUT THE FULL SIZE, THE FULL TRAILER PARK, WHICH WAS 288 SLOTS, ACCORDING TO YOUR OWN WATER DEPARTMENT WITH HOW MUCH WATER IS USED PER PERSON, THAT CALCULATES WITH THREE THREE PERSONS AT THE TRAILER PARK WITH THE FULL SIZE ONE AT 2000 GALLONS OF PERSON PER MONTH. THAT EQUATES TO 1.3 MILLION EXCUSE ME, 1.68 MILLION GALLONS OF WATER A MONTH. I DON'T THINK ANY OF THAT'S BEEN TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. AND IF THIS PASSES, THAT'S FIRST TRAILER PARK, THEN IT WILL BE VERY EASY TO FINISH PHASE TWO, THREE AND FOUR, WHICH IS THE FULL SIZE TRAILER PARK. YOU'VE ALREADY GOT A PROBLEM ON SHANKS ROAD. IF YOU IF YOU YOUR BOARD DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT IT. SHANKS ROAD HAS A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH ITS DRAINAGE, ITS WATER AND WITH THE SEWER SYSTEM ON SHANKS ROAD. I KNOW I HAVE THE LIFT STATION RIGHT NEXT TO ME AND IT HAS TO BE CHECKED EVERY DAY BECAUSE OF LIMITS. EVEN OVER THANKSGIVING, IT HAD TO THE CITY OF ANGLETON. CHRIS HAS A WONDERFUL STAFF. THEY CAME OUT BECAUSE THE ALARMS WENT OFF ON THE LOAD LIMIT. AND THIS WAS OVER THANKSGIVING. AND THIS IS WHERE YOUR SEWER IS GOING TO COME TO. THAT'S GOING TO BE A PROBLEM. NOW, THE TRAILER PARK JUST DOWN FROM ME ON SHANKS ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 300 TRAILERS. IT'S SOMETHING IN THE AREA OF THAT. IN A TWO YEAR TIME SPAN, TWO YEARS ANGLETON PD ANSWERED 320 POLICE CALLS THERE, 559 FIRE CALLS, 18 AMBULANCE CALLS, 15 ANIMAL CONTROL CALLS. NOW, WHAT'S ALSO BEEN MENTIONED ABOUT THIS TRAILER PARK COMING IN AND THIS HAS BEEN SAID AT TWO MEETINGS IS THEY WANT TO CONTINUE GIFFORD ROAD ALL THE WAY TO 220. WHICH ACTUALLY WOULD CUT MY PROPERTY IN HALF. I WILL TELL YOU THE SAME THING I TOLD CITY COUNCIL. SAME THING I TOLD PLANNING AND ZONING. I KNOW THAT THEN WOULD BECOME AN EMINENT DOMAIN EMINENT DOMAIN ISSUE, WHICH I WOULD FIGHT TO MY LAST PENNY TO KEEP MY PROPERTY FROM GETTING DIVIDED. SHANKS ROAD ALREADY HAS TOO MANY ROADS, AND PHILIP'S ROAD INTERSECTS SHINES WHEN YOU COME OUT OF THAT TRAILER PARK. YOU'RE GOING TO END UP TAKING PHILLIPS TO SHANKS, COME DOWN, SHANKS IT TO 20. BASED ON THEIR NUMBERS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AN ADDITIONAL 1600 CARS ON PHILLIPS AND SHANKS ROAD. YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR FROM SOMEONE ELSE, SHANKS ROAD. SHANKS AND PHILLIPS CANNOT HANDLE THE TRAFFIC. WE ALREADY HAVE PROBLEMS ON SHANKS ROAD EXCUSE ME, ON SHANKS AND PHILLIPS ROAD. IT'S BEEN BROUGHT UP ABOUT AFFORDABLE HOUSING. YOU HAVE ANOTHER TRAILER PARK COMING IN AT COUNTY ROAD, 288 AND 220. THAT'S 900 SLOTS. IF WE NEED AFFORDABLE HOUSING, THEY CAN GO DOWN THERE. I DON'T WANT MY PROPERTY VALUES AFFECTED, WHICH IS WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. AND, YOU KNOW, AND I KNOW YOU GUYS HAVE A REALLY TOUGH JOB, BUT SOMETHING WAS JUST MENTIONED I HEARD THIS WAS BROUGHT UP TMP, WHICH IS OUR MAJOR PROVIDER. THEY SAID THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE. I WOULD STRONGLY RECOMMEND IF YOU THINK YOU'RE GOING TO PASS IT, YOU HAVE A COMMITTEE FORM TO FIND OUT WHAT KIND OF SAFETY ISSUE IT IS, BECAUSE I WILL TELL YOU IF TEMPE. IS SAYING THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE BY MOVING UTILITIES. I WOULD TELL YOU TO INVESTIGATE THAT GREATLY REGARDLESS THAT THE CITY STAFF SAID THAT THIS WOULD BE OC. THAT WORD ALONE SAFETY. AND I SPENT 32 YEARS IN THE SAFETY BUSINESS. THAT SHOULD RAISE A BUNCH OF RED FLAGS THAT YOU WOULD WANT ANSWERED TO THE NTH DEGREE ABOUT WHY TMP SAYS MAYBE EVEN HAVE A HEARING AND HAVE TMP COME UP AND LET THEM TELL YOU WHY THEY HAVE SAFETY RESTRICTIONS AND FOR US TO AVOID THEIR SAFETY RESTRICTIONS. THAT SHOULD BE THROWING A RED FLAG AT EVERYBODY. I KNOW YOU HAVE A HARD JOB. I DON'T KNOW THE PEOPLE BUILDING IT PERSONALLY. I UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO. BUT I'M TELLING YOU, WE DON'T WANT IT. [00:20:02] YOUR LANDOWNERS DON'T WANT IT. THERE'S TOO MANY OTHER FACTORS. AND ON TOP OF ALL OF THAT, AGAIN AND I'LL FINISH ON TOP OF THAT, THE MAIN UTILITIES THAT PROVIDE OUR ELECTRIC IS TELLING YOU THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE THAT WAS IN THEIR SAFETY. I THINK OBVIOUSLY, I'M AGAINST IT. I THINK YOU SHOULD REALLY SERIOUSLY EVALUATE ALL THE STUFF WE'VE SAID AND YOU ALSO HAVE THE SAFETY FACTOR THAT. THAT TO ME NEEDS TO BE EXPLORED GREATLY. SO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO. WE ALL APPRECIATE IT. NO, IT'S A HARD JOB, BUT KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT ABSOLUTELY DO NOT WANT THIS. SO, AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. THANK YOU, MADAM ACTING CHAIR. AND I DO APOLOGIZE. I NOTED SPRIGGS, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. BUT I WANTED TO ALSO NOTE, IF YOU DON'T MIND LETTING THE APPLICANT SPEAK AFTER STAFF, THAT WAY THEY CAN EXPLAIN THEIR PROPOSAL, AND THEN WE'LL CONTINUE ON WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING. BUT THAT'S OKAY. AND THEN I WANTED TO ALSO JUST CLARIFY AND THEY WILL EXPLAIN WHAT TNP SAID ABOUT THE SAFETY ISSUES. BUT I THINK IT WAS MORE LIKE THEIR STAFF ACCESSING THE REAR YARDS, BUT THEY'LL TALK MORE ABOUT THAT, I DO BELIEVE. AND THEN I FAILED TO MENTION THERE'S SOME DISCUSSION, I THINK, AND MAYBE MISUNDERSTANDING AS TO SOME FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BY THIS DEVELOPER THAT HE PRESENTED TO THE CITY. JUST TO CLARIFY AND FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THERE WERE TWO DEVELOPMENTS THAT HE PROPOSED SOUTH OF THIS TRACT TO THE CITY AS A CONCEPT AND AN IDEA JUST TO GET FEEDBACK. AND AS NOTED, THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID NOT SORT SUPPORT THAT LAY OUT DUE TO THE DENSITY QUESTIONS AND ALSO UTILITY CONCERNS AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONCERNS. SO THE APPLICANT WENT BACK AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY HAVE DEVIATED FROM THAT IDEA AND WILL NOT BE SUBMITTING THAT THAT WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH A REZONING PROCESS AND ZATION INTO THE CITY IN SOME INSTANCES. SO THERE WILL BE A PUBLIC PROCESS IF ANY DEVELOPMENT COMES IN SOUTH OF THESE TRACKS THAT ARE NOT IN THE CITY. BUT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT. BUT THE APPLICANTS CAN EXPLAIN WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING AND MAYBE ANSWER SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT MAY ARISE. AND MY APOLOGIES. I DID INTEND TO ASK FOR THE APPLICANT NEXT AND I SKIPPED IT. SO I'M VERY SORRY WITH THE APPLICANT. LIKE TO. I'M SORRY. I NEED CLARIFICATION. THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO DO WITH THIS GENTLEMAN IS SAYING I'M SORRY. AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS. WE CAN WE CAN GET WE CAN GET BACK TO ADDRESS ALL OF THAT RIGHT NOW. YES. AND I SKIPPED THE APPLICANT, SO THAT'S MY APOLOGIES. I SHOULD HAVE ASKED HIM FIRST. I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY, SIR. YES. SO MY NAME IS MIKE. I'M. I'M THE OWNER OF ANGLETON PARK PLACE, AND I DID PROPOSE TO BUY THE 71 ACRES. NEXT DOOR OF THE COUNCIL ARE THE MEETING THAT I WENT TO LAST. THE PEOPLE WERE TOTALLY AGAINST IT. I'VE GOTTEN MY EARNEST MONEY BACK SINCE THEN. SO THAT PROJECT IS IS NOT ANYWHERE IN THIS DISCUSSION. I'VE OWNED THE INGLETON PARK PLACE FOR ABOUT FOUR YEARS NOW. IT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED FOR A MOBILE HOME PARK FROM THE PREVIOUS CITY MANAGER. FROM THERE I DECIDED I DIDN'T WANT TO BUILD A MOBILE HOME PARK, SO I WENT FOR THE MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION. THAT'S WHERE WE CAME AND STRIPPED IT UP INTO LOTS TO WHERE WE'RE GOING TO ACTUALLY PURCHASE THE MOBILE HOMES AND SELL THE THE TRACK OF LAND AND THE MOBILE HOMES TOGETHER. THERE'S NOT A SAFETY ISSUE WITH MOST ALL TEXAS, NEW MEXICO AND ALL THEIR CITIES. THEY'RE MOVING THE POWER TO THE FRONT. IT'S EASIER FOR THEM TO NOT HAVE TO GO TO THE BACK FOR THE ANIMALS, COVET DIFFERENT THINGS LIKE THAT. WHAT HE SAID, HE SAID ANGLETON IS ONE OF THE ONLY CITIES THAT HE'S DEALING WITH NOW THAT STILL HAS AN ORDINANCE TO WHERE THE UTILITIES ARE IN THE BACK AND THAT MOSTLY ALL THE CITIES NOW ARE MOVING EVERYTHING TO THE FRONT. SO TODAY WE'RE HERE TO ASK FOR PERMISSION TO RUN THE WATER AND THE POWER IN THE FRONT SO THAT WE COULD MOVE FORWARD WITH THE PROJECT. AND THERE WILL BE NO MORE DISCUSSION FOR THE LAND NEXT DOOR. I'VE GOT MY EARNEST MONEY BACK AND WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO EXPAND ANY MORE FURTHER THAN WHAT WE HAVE HERE PROPOSED TODAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. AND AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE. IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS YOU GUYS HAVE FOR US? ME? NOT RIGHT NOW. I HAVE A QUESTION. WERE YOU IN CONVERSATION WITH OR AWARE OF TEXAS? NEW MEXICO'S? PRACTICES, I GUESS CURRENT PRACTICES AS WELL AS SINGLETONS ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU BEGAN DEVELOPMENT. [00:25:03] KNOW ME, I'VE PAID. I'LL LET THEM SPEAK FOR THAT. I'LL LET HIM TALK. I PAY. I PAID THEM. I'LL LET HIM SPEAK FOR THAT, IF THAT'S OKAY FOR HIM TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION. OKAY. OKAY. SO JUST TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THERE'S KIND OF A. CAN YOU INTRODUCE YOURSELF, PLEASE? YES. MY NAME IS MIGUEL SALCIDO WITH BAKER AND LAWSON ENGINEERS. I THINK IT WAS IN THE YEAR 2020 OR 2021 WHEN GREYSTONE SUBDIVISION WAS BEING BUILT. THE THE OWNER DEVELOPER OF THAT SUBDIVISION MADE A REQUEST TO THE CITY OF ANGLETON TO ADOPT AN ORDINANCE TO PUT UTILITIES IN THE BACKYARD OF THE SUBDIVISION. MIKE ACTUALLY STARTED THIS PROJECT BACK IN 2018. HE DOES. MY ASSUMPTION IS HE DOESN'T HAVE A PREFERENCE IF IT'S IN THE FRONT OF THE BACK. BUT WHAT WE HAVE IS THE SITUATION IS A. TEXAS. NEW MEXICO HAS POLICIES ON CERTAIN TYPES OF SUBDIVISION DESIGNS, AND ANGLETON HAS GOT A POLICY ON REQUIRING THE UTILITIES IN THE BACKYARD. WELL. FOR MY SUBDIVISION. THEY SAID THEY WILL ONLY PUT IT IN THE FRONT. AND WE HAVE THAT IN WRITING FROM TEXAS, NEW MEXICO POWER. WE'RE JUST TRYING TO RESOLVE TWO RULES THAT. WE HAVE BETWEEN TEXAS, NEW MEXICO AND THE CITY. AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE PRESENTING THIS VARIANCE FOR THIS SUBDIVISION. BUT THE RULE FOR REQUIRING THE UTILITIES IN THE BACK, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WAS RECENTLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY. I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT EXACT YEAR WAS, BUT IT WAS IT STARTED WITH GREYSTONE SUBDIVISION AND ALL THE SUBDIVISIONS AFTER IT ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION WHILE THE CHECK. BUT I THOUGHT THE. THEY GAVE THE. THAT'S WHY. THAT'S WHY I REMEMBER. OKAY. ROBYN. I'M SORRY. I'M ROBIN CROUCH WITH BAKER AND LAWSON, AND I THINK THE COUNCIL CAME BACK AND SAID THAT THEY DID NOT WANT TO GIVE THE DEVELOPER THE OPTION. THEY WANTED HIM TO HAVE TO COME FOR A VARIANCE IF IT WAS NOT IN THE BACK. IS WHAT I THINK. AND THAT'S WHY BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT THE CHEAPER WAY TO BE DONE. SO. AND WHAT EXACTLY HAS TEXAS, NEW MEXICO AND TEXAS NEW MEXICO'S STANCE BEEN ON WHY THEY WON'T? BECAUSE I'M READING THEIR RESTRICTIONS FOR WHY THEY DON'T WHEN THEY WON'T PUT IT IN THE BACK. AND I'M NOT I MEAN, THESE ARE 55, RIGHT? NOT 50. SO THAT'S NOT IT. NO. WHAT WHY ARE THEY SAYING THEY WON'T PUT IT IN THE BACK? THERE NEEDS TO BE A CORRECTION. THE WRONG PLOT IS UP IN THIS PRESENTATION. WE HAD A PLOT FOR SECTION ONE WHICH HAS 40 FOOT WIDE LOTS, AND TEXAS NEW MEXICO WILL NOT PUT THE UTILITIES IN THE BACKUP FORTIES. AND YOU HAVE THE MEMO FROM TEXAS, NEW MEXICO IN YOUR PACKET? YES. THE PLOT THAT I'M TALKING ABOUT THAT WAS APPROVED BY P AND Z AND COUNCIL EARLIER THIS YEAR FOR THE 40 FOOT LOTS. IT MEETS THE CRITERIA. THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF MANUFACTURED HOUSING DOES ALLOW FOR THAT AND. THE REASON WHY WE MADE A CHANGE FROM THE PLOT TO THE NEW PLOT IS BECAUSE THE OWNER IN THE CITY MADE AN AGREEMENT THAT HE WOULD DO THE EXTENSION OF GIFFARD ROAD OR THE CITY. SO HE CHANGED THE PLOT SO HE COULD MAKE UP THE COST FOR BUILDING GIFFORD ROAD. SO IF I'M UNDERSTANDING SMALLER LOTS IN EXCHANGE FOR ROADWORK. YES. OKAY. TO ME. FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. SAUCEDO. THANK YOU. I DO HAVE ANOTHER PERSON WISHING TO ADDRESS THE BOARD AND MR. ROSA. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SHARE INFORMATION WITH YOU. AS I UNDERSTAND IT, THE. [00:30:02] CHANGE FOR THE TRAILER COURT HAS BEEN SEVERAL YEARS AGO. MY CONCERN AND I WOULD JUST BRING THIS TO YOUR ATTENTION IT GOES ALONG WITH THE PREVIOUS SPEAKER IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THAT AREA. I LIVE ON 290. PHILLIPS AND THAT IS A WIDELY USED ROAD. THEY USE IT TO CROSS FROM 288, BE OVER TO THE FAIRGROUNDS AREA AND CONNECT INTO GIFFORD. GIFFORD IS SO MY CONCERN IS THE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THAT ENTIRE AREA TO NON PHILLIPS IS UNIMPROVED HAS NO SIDEWALKS CHILDREN PEOPLE WALK ON THE STREETS THERE ARE FOLKS THAT. EXCEED THE SPEED LIMIT NUMEROUS TIMES DURING THE DAY. YOU KNOW YOUR YOUR POLICE ARE QUITE ACTIVE THERE WE SEE THEM SO IT'S JUST JUST A MATTER OF NOT BEING ABLE TO BE THERE AT THE RIGHT PLACE AT THE RIGHT TIME. ALSO THE WATER AND THE SEWER ON ON THAT SIDE. I JUST ASKED FOR THAT TO BE CONSIDERED BECAUSE EVEN IN SMALL, AS THEY'VE ALREADY STATED, SMALL SHOWERS, WE HAVE STORM SEWERS THAT THE WATER SHOOTS OUT OF THE MANHOLES IN THE MIDDLE OF THE STREETS. AND SO. WHERE THEY'RE ALSO PROPOSING THAT GIFFORD COME DOWN THAT'S ON THERE'S A RIGHT OF WAY IN THERE ALSO FOR THE LEVY SO I'M NOT SURE IF HOW THAT'S GOING TO CONNECT WITH THE THE ROAD THERE AND ALSO WOULD ASK. TO LOOK BACK AT THE RECORD TO SEE WHAT THE RETENTION POLICY WAS FOR WATER RUNOFF. WHEN YOU PUT ROADS AND PADS AND THINGS LIKE THAT IN THAT FLAT AREA, BECAUSE WE ALREADY KNOW THAT THE DRAINAGE IS NOT GOOD IN THERE BECAUSE WE'RE AT ABOUT 26 FEET SEA LEVEL. SO THAT'S THAT'S PRETTY CLOSE. AND SO I JUST ASKED FOR PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION THAT THIS BE LOOKED AT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS THE DIRECTION THAT YOU WANT TO GO. THANK YOU. WAS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD? YES, SIR. NO, I'M BORED TO GRIEF THE OWNER OF 312 PHILLIPS. I JUST HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS. ONE OF THEM WAS A DRAINAGE. WE HAVE A DRAINAGE ISSUES ON THIS PROPERTY. ARE YOU ALL BUILDING THIS PROPERTY UP? THE THE WHAT IS IT CALLED? THE MOBILE HOME PARK OR WHATEVER. ARE YOU ALL BUILDING IT UP OR IS THIS GOING TO STAY THE SAME LEVEL. YOU CAN DO THAT IN JUST A MOMENT. JUST ADDRESS THE BOARD WITH YOUR COMMENTS AND THEN WE'LL FOLLOW UP. ANOTHER QUESTION WAS THAT THE SEPTIC OR WHATEVER WE ARE GOING TO DO WITH THE SEPTIC AND IS IT GOING TO BE A FENCE PROPERTY ALL THE WAY AROUND? AND ALSO THE 312 PHILLIPS I LOOKED AT THE MAP. AND ARE Y'ALL ARE Y'ALL PUTTING THE ENTRYWAY RIGHT IN BETWEEN THOSE TWO PROPERTIES OR LIKE, WHAT'S GOING TO GO GO ON WITH THAT? AND THEN. AND THEN ARE THEY BUILDING THE MOBILE HOME PARKS THEMSELVES, LIKE THE MOBILE, THE BUILDINGS, OR ARE THEY GOING TO MOVE THEM DOWN OR THE. OR THE PROPERTY THE OR THE PROPERTY OWNER IS GOING TO. I CAN'T EVEN TALK RIGHT NOW. THE PROPERTY OWNERS, ARE THEY GOING TO. OFFER THEM. LIKE, ARE THEY GOING TO GIVE THEM THE MOBILE PART? SO THOSE ARE CONCERNS THAT WE CAN ASK BAKER AND LAWSON TO ADDRESS FOR YOU. OKAY. DID YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO, IT WAS JUST QUESTIONS. NO CONCERNS. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. OKAY. I KNOW THAT IT'S A BIT OFF TOPIC FROM THE VARIANCE REQUESTS, BUT I DO WANT TO STATE WE ARE PROVIDING DETENTION ON THE PROPERTY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT TO AFFECT THE IMPACT OF THE INCREASE IMPERVIOUS COVER ON OUR PLAT. WE ARE PUTTING DITCHES ON ALL SIDES OF THE PROPERTY SO THERE WON'T BE ANY IMPACT OF BURNING UP AGAINST OUR NEIGHBORS. AND IN TERMS OF THE TRAFFIC AND THE IMPROVEMENTS TO PHILIPS ROAD, THERE WAS A THRESHOLD STUDY DONE ON THE PROPERTY AND THE NUMBER OF LOTS HERE DOESN'T EXCEED ANY TRIGGERS FOR OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS WITH THE ROAD. FOR UTILITIES. MR. MORGAN HAS ALREADY PAID THE CITY TO DO A CAPS CALF CALF STUDY ON THE PROPERTY, AND THERE WAS NO REQUIREMENT FOR ANY OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE UTILITIES. BUT WE HAVE DONE OUR HOMEWORK ON THE IMPACTS OF THIS SUBDIVISION. [00:35:04] AND THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I HAVE FOR THE ANSWER FOR THE GENTLEMAN. THANK YOU. AND IT IS OFF TOPIC, BUT THANK YOU FOR ADDRESSING HIS CONCERNS. OH, YEAH. JUST ONE MORE THING. THE ACCESSIBILITY FOR THIS SUBDIVISION. WE ARE GOING TO BE PROVIDING SIDEWALKS THROUGH THE SUBDIVISION. WHEN WE DO THE GIFFORD ROAD EXPANSION, WE ARE GOING TO BE PROVIDING SIDEWALKS ALONG GIFFORD ROAD TO TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S RULES ON THE SIDEWALKS. THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS REGARDING THE ADJUSTMENT, MOVING THE UTILITIES TO THE FRONT YARD FROM THE REAR? YES, MA'AM. HI, MY NAME IS PARRISH GIL. QUICK QUESTION TO YOU BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT WAS ADDRESSED. SHE SAID YOU CHANGE FROM 55, 55, SPACING TO 40. CORRECT. SO HOW MANY TOTAL WILL THAT ALLOW FOR THAT AREA? THE 81 TOTAL LIVES ON THE FIVE. MR. MIKE, WE HAVE TO GET YOU ON THE RECORDING. I AM SO SORRY. YES, SIR. I'M SORRY. THERE'S GOING TO BE 81 TOTAL LOTS. AND THEY'RE ALL GOING TO. THEY'RE ALL GOING TO MEET THE CITY REQUIREMENT. IF YOU PULL UP THE REQUIREMENTS OF A MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION, THE REQUIREMENTS ARE 40 FOOT LOTS. A LOT OF THEM ARE 48 FOOT LOTS. I DON'T I'M NOT SURE WHY THE PLOTS, NOT THE THE LAYOUT. YEAH. THIS IS JUST FOR CONCEPT, JUST TO SHOW THAT THERE WERE TWO SECTIONS. SO MY APOLOGIES A LOT. MOST OF THE LOTS, IF YOU LOOK ON THERE ARE 48 FOOT WIDE. SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE OF THE DRAWING THAT WE'RE PROPOSING, ALL THE MIDDLE ONES THAT ARE IN THERE ALL GOING TO BE DOUBLE WIDE, BRAND NEW MOBILE HOMES AND ALL THE ONES ON THE OUTSIDE PERIMETER ON THE OUTSIDE ARE GOING TO BE BRAND NEW 18 BY 76 OR 16 BY 76. THE PROPOSED DEAL HERE IS TO PUT IN BRAND NEW 20, 22, 23 MOBILE HOMES. SO THESE ARE NOT GOING TO BE OLD TRAILERS THAT WE'RE FINDING REPOS AND THESE ARE GOING TO BE PUT UP FOR SALE FOR HOMEOWNERS HERE IN ANGLETON AND THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE SIX CAR PARKING. SO THIS IS NOT A MOBILE HOME PARK, WHICH IS RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD FROM THESE PEOPLE'S HOUSE. AND IT IS NOT ON SHANKS ROAD, IT'S ON GIFFORD ROAD AND IT'S AT THE INTERSECTION. WE'RE NOT EVEN GOING TO BE GOING DOWN THE ROAD THAT THEY HAVE THE CONCERN ON. AND THE OTHER THING IS, IF YOU GO TO THE OTHER PARKS, ALL THEIR PARKS HAVE TWO CAR PARKING AND THEN THEY HAVE EVERYBODY INSIDE OF THE IN THE ROADS. IF YOU LOOK AT THE WAY OUR DESIGN, IT HAS AVAILABILITY TO HAVE SIX CAR PARKING AT EVERY SITE AND THE ROADS ARE ARE ALL BUILT. THE CITY IT'S THE SUBDIVISION IS BUILT THE SAME AS A HOME SUBDIVISION AS FAR AS THE STREETS, THE SIDEWALKS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND WE ACTUALLY HAVE MORE PARKING. THEN I WENT AND DROVE AROUND TO THE NEW SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE BEING BUILT NOW AND THEY'RE VERY COMPACT AND THE ROADS ALMOST HANG OFF THEIR CARS, HANG OFF INTO THE ROAD OR PASS THE SIDEWALK WITH OUR DESIGN. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO THAT. EVERYTHING'S GOING TO BE OFF THE ROAD AND IT'S GOING TO HAVE PLENTY OF PARKING FOR PEOPLE LIVING THERE AND THEIR COMPANY. MR.. MORGAN AND ALSO, FOR CLARIFICATION, CAN YOU EXPLAIN THEIR APPROACH IN TERMS OF FOUNDATION OR ATTACHMENT TO THE GROUND FOR THE UNITS? ALL THE UNITS ARE GOING TO BE TIED DOWN TO CONCRETE. THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE PERMANENTLY FIXED. THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THE AXLES TAKEN OUT FROM UNDERNEATH THEM AND THEY'RE ALL GOING TO BE HAVE CONCRETE SLABS POURED UNDERNEATH THE MODULAR HOMES. SO THIS IS GOING TO BE A FIRST CLASS SUBDIVISION. WE NAMED IT ANGLETON PARK PLACE FOR A REASON. WE'VE GIVEN YOU GUYS THE THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION, THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT. AND INSIDE THERE THERE'S SOME STRICT THINGS OF NO BROKEN DOWN CARS IN THE FRONT, ALL STRICT THINGS IN THE FRONT ABOUT MOWING, ABOUT PRESSURE, WASHING, KEEPING UP WITH THE PAINT. SO WHEN WE DEVELOP THIS, WE HAD IN MIND TO BRING SOMETHING THAT THE CITY THAT OTHER PLACES DON'T HAVE, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE GRAVEL, IT'S GOING TO BE CONCRETE. AND THEN WE'RE ALSO PUTTING IN A FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS THROUGH THE WHOLE PLACE TO KEEP EVERYBODY OFF THE STREETS AND THINGS LIKE THAT. I SAID IN THE LAST MEETING, I'M THE ONE THAT BUILT THE GULF COAST FIVE STAR RV PARK IN OYSTER CREEK, AND I REPRESENTED FIRST CLASS. AND IF YOU LOOK AT THAT ONE, YOU CAN DRIVE BY AND SEE TODAY IT'S STILL ONE OF THE VERY BEST LOOKING PARKS AROUND AS FAR AS THAT KIND OF WORK. AND THAT'S WHAT WE WERE TRYING TO DO HERE AND WE WERE HOPING WE COULD ADD ON. BUT THAT IS OUT OF THE QUESTION. [00:40:03] WE KNOW WITH THE NEIGHBORS THAT THEY'RE NOT GOING TO ALLOW THAT. WHEN I PURCHASED THIS LAND FOUR YEARS AGO, FIVE YEARS AGO, IT WAS ZONED FOR THIS. AND THIS IS WHERE WE'RE AT TODAY, THE LAST STEP TO TRY TO GET THIS PROJECT GOING. WE DO PLAN TO BUILD THE WHOLE THING IN 111 PROJECT AT ONE TIME. ORIGINALLY WE BROKE IT UP INTO PHASE ONE, TWO AND THREE, BUT THINGS HAVE BEEN GOOD FOR US MONEY WISE. WE'VE GOT THE MONEY BUILT UP TO PAY CASH TO BE ABLE TO BUILD THE PARK AT ONE TIME. AND WE ALSO HAVE THE TRAILERS AVAILABLE TO PUT IN THE NEW TRAILERS, AND WE HAVE SEVERAL MODELS TO PICK FROM. THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD REGARDING THE MOVEMENT OF. YES, SIR. OKAY. AND FOLKS, I DON'T KNOW THIS GENTLEMAN. I'M SURE HE'S A GOOD GUY. I'M SURE OF THAT. HE'S TRYING TO DO SOMETHING AND I CAN APPLAUD YOU FOR THAT. I WILL TELL YOU SOME COUPLE OF THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN SAID. THERE ARE NO RETENTION PONDS. I HEARD THAT THEY'RE GOING TO DO A DRAINAGE AROUND IT. AND MR. ROSSA, WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT IS DRAINAGE DITCH. AND I BELIEVE IT'S OH, THAT IS A MAJOR IMPACT WHERE THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT THEY'RE GOING TO COME IN AND FIX ALL THAT WITH THE WAY THE STREET. NOW, I STILL HAVEN'T GOT CLARIFICATION ON THE STREET, AS THIS GENTLEMAN ASKED, IS THE STREET FURTHER UP COMING IN BETWEEN THE TWO HOUSES OR IS IT COMING THROUGH THE DITCH AND THEY'RE GOING TO REDO THE DITCH AND THEN MODIFY THE WATER FLOW FOR THE DITCH? I DON'T THINK THOSE QUESTIONS HAVE BEEN ASKED. THIS PROJECT WAS DONE 20, 25 YEARS AGO. IT WAS DONE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ANGLETON, SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR. NOT THIS GENTLEMAN, SOMETHING VERY SIMILAR WAS ATTEMPTED. AND IT'S OVER OFF TEXAE AND TRAIL. AND IF YOU WILL GO LOOK, THERE'S ONLY ONE MOBILE HOME PARK THAT WAS LEFT THERE WHEN THEY STARTED THIS. THE CITY HAD SOME SOME OBJECTIONS TO IT, BUT ONE MOBILE HOME HAD ALREADY GOTTEN IN BEFORE THE DEVELOPER PULLED OUT AND SOLD IT BACK AS HOME HOUSE LOTS. NOW, IT'S A BEAUTIFUL SUBDIVISION AND IF YOU DRIVE OVER THERE, THERE'S ONE MOBILE HOME. IT'S A DOUBLE WIDE THAT'S THERE AND IT'S 20 YEARS OLD, OR IT MAY BE 30 YEARS OLD. AND IT IS EXACTLY WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT. GO LOOK AT IT. IT'S RUN DOWN. IT'S RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF A BEAUTIFUL SUBDIVISION. I UNDERSTAND THEY WANT TO PUT RESTRICTIONS. MAYBE EVEN AN HOA. WE ALL KNOW THAT IT'S ONLY AS GOOD AS THE BOARD THAT YOU ELECT TO ENFORCE AN HOA. I DON'T BELIEVE THAT WILL HAPPEN. NOT IN IN THIS SITUATION, THE DRAINAGE. AND AGAIN, I GO BACK TO THIS ON DRAINAGE, WATER, SEWER. WE'RE THE FOLKS THAT LIVE ON PHILLIPS AND SHANKS. THESE ARE THE LANDHOLDERS HERE THAT LIVE THERE. WE CAN TELL YOU FROM EXPERIENCE THERE ARE PROBLEMS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN. THE CITY OF ANGLETON IS TRYING TO DO SOME THINGS TO FIX IT. I APPRECIATE IT, BUT YOUR SEWER HAS A PROBLEM. IT BACKS UP VERY SIMPLY FLOODED THEIR HOUSE. THE CITY CAME OUT. THEY HAVE REQUIRED IN THEIR DITCH ON SHANKS ROAD. THERE IS AN EXIT PIPE NOW SO THAT WHEN THE SEWER BACKS UP, INSTEAD OF BACKING UP INTO THEIR SONS, IN THEIR IN THEIR HOUSE, IT NOW BACKS UP INTO THE DITCH. SO IT OVERFLOWS IN THE DITCH UNTIL THE PROBLEM CAN BE RESOLVED. YOUR WATER PRESSURE, ANY TIME WE HAVE A RAIN, A HEAVY RAIN, THE WATER PRESSURE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN DIPS DRAMATICALLY. WE EVEN WE LAUGH ABOUT IT BECAUSE WE ALL KNOW YOUR SHOWERS GET SHORTER BECAUSE YOU'VE HAD A RAIN ON THE SOUTH SIDE. SO I'M JUST EXPRESSING AGAIN, PROBABLY A GREAT GUY, APPRECIATE WHAT HIS VISION IS, IF HE COULD HAVE MAYBE MADE THEM LARGER AND MADE THEM FOR HOUSES, MAYBE A DIFFERENT STORY, MAYBE, MAYBE NOT. YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE STILL THE SAME, BUT THE INFRASTRUCTURE, AS GOOD AS THIS IS WITH ALL THE IDEAS THEY'VE TAKEN IN RETENTION, YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT IT. ONCE IT LEAVES THAT PROPERTY, WHICH IT'S GOING TO LEAVE THE RETENTION. THERE ARE NO PONDS. IT'S A DITCH IS WHAT THEY HAVE JUST SAID. THE ENGINEER JUST SAID IT'S A DITCH. IT GOES AROUND IT. ONCE IT LEAVES THERE, IT STILL ENTERS THE CITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE, IT ENTERS THE DITCH. THE SEWER IS GOING TO HAVE TO IT'LL IT'LL BE ENTERING INTO OUR SEWER SYSTEM AND IT ENTERS INTO OUR WATER SYSTEM. SO. I CAN'T IMPLORE THAT ENOUGH. AND THEN THEIR TRAFFIC CONDITIONS. 25 YEARS AGO, AN ELDERLY LADY WAS ON PHILIPS ROAD, DROVE DOWN IT, GOT LOST, TRIED TO TURN AROUND, AND EXACTLY WHAT MR. ROSA TALKED ABOUT. UNFORTUNATELY, THE WOMAN ROLLED THE CAR AND IT KILLED HER. AND IT WAS A VERY, VERY UNFORTUNATE ACCIDENT. IT WAS AN ACCIDENT. THOSE ARE THE ISSUES THAT I THINK YOU HAVE TO GET ADDRESSED BEFORE YOU CAN DO ANYTHING FURTHER, IS FIX THE INFRASTRUCTURE, FIX THE ROADS. AND THEN IF SOMETHING LIKE THIS COMES IN, AS LONG AS THE CITY MAKES THE ULTIMATE DECISION ON IT, BUT YOUR LANDOWNERS ARE SITTING HERE TELLING YOU THEIR [00:45:09] PROBLEMS, EVEN IF YOU DIDN'T HAVE THIS TRAILER PARK TRYING TO COME IN, THERE ARE PROBLEMS ON THE SOUTH SIDE THAT WILL NOT HANDLE WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE. WE ALREADY HAVE PROBLEMS, AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO ADD 70. 80, ROUGHLY 80 SLOTS. AND THEY SAID THIS WAS OUT OF HIS MOUTH. SIX SLOTS PER SIX PARKING SLOTS. THAT'S SIX PEOPLE. THAT'S IF YOU DO THAT, THAT'S 3.8 MILLION GALLONS OF WATER A MONTH YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT NOW GOING INTO THE SYSTEM. SO THESE ARE THOSE FIGURES THAT NEED TO BE LOOKED AT. THESE ARE THOSE THINGS THAT YOU GUYS UNFORTUNATELY, AND I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU DO, BUT IT'S WHAT YOU'VE BEEN TASKED WITH DOING AND IT'S WHAT YOU ACCEPTED THE RESPONSIBILITY OF. YOU'VE GOT AN INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THIS EITHER WAY. THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME FROM THE OTHER LANDOWNERS THAT ARE NOT HERE THAT THAT HAVE TEXTED ME. THEY THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AS WELL. SO THANK YOU. IT'S OKAY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THAT'S WHAT IT'S OKAY TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC. AND. UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE GETTING OFF TOPIC QUITE A BIT. WE'RE ONLY HERE TO ADDRESS THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE UTILITIES FROM THE REAR TO THE FRONT. SO IF THERE'S ANYBODY THAT WANTS TO SPEAK STRICTLY TO THAT, I'D ENTERTAIN THAT. OTHER THAN THAT, I'D LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE FORWARD. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, ANY DISCUSSION? ALL IN FAVOR? OPPOSED. MOTION CARRIED. IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION AMONGST THE BOARD REGARDING. GOING AHEAD AND VOTING FOR THIS ADJUSTMENT TO SECTION. 23. 15. SO I DID WANT TO SAY ONE QUICK THING. I KNOW EVERYBODY UP HERE LIVES HERE IN ANGLETON AND WE LOVE OUR COMMUNITY AND THAT'S WHY WE DO THIS. AND WE DO APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERNS. UNFORTUNATELY, WHAT WE'RE HERE TO DISCUSS IS JUST THE MOVEMENT OF THE UTILITIES FROM THE REAR TO THE FRONT. WE HAVE A SET OF GUIDELINES. IF THE GUIDELINES MEET THE CRITERIA, WE PASS IT. IF IT DOESN'T MEET IT, WE DON'T. I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT IT'S NOT THAT WE DON'T APPRECIATE YOUR CONCERNS. IT'S JUST WHAT WE'RE HERE TO DISCUSS IS THE ADJUSTMENT. IS THERE ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? AND ENTERTAIN A. MOTION TO. ACCEPT STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND APPROVE THE VARIANCE TO SECTION 23 TO 15. I MAKE A MOTION THAT THE CRITERIA OF SECTION 2823 F HAS BEEN MET AND RENOVATIONS TO SECTION 2315 THE DRAINAGE UTILITY REQUIREMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE PLACEMENT IN THE FRONT OF THE. SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED. I. SPECIFICALLY. MY CONCERN WOULD BE THAT I DON'T THINK WE'VE SATISFIED C. UNDER 2820 3F3. I THINK THIS SITUATION APPLIES TO. ALL PROPERTIES GENERALLY AFFECTS ALL PROPERTIES IN THE SAME ZONING DISTRICT. SO IT'S 4 TO 1. SO YOU COULD KEEP ME. I'M SORRY. I JUST NOTED MINE FOR. I'M SO SORRY. SO. SO. FOUR IN FAVOR. ONE OPPOSE MOTION CARRIES. I WOULD LIKE TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE MEETING. I BELIEVE THAT. ADJOURN. YES, ADJOURN THE MEETING. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. SECOND. MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. MEETING ADJOURNED. [00:50:02] THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU ALL. SORRY. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.