[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:09]
P.M.. WE DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT.I'LL GO AND CALL US TO ORDER AND WE'LL START OUR WORKSHOP.
[1. Discussion and possible action on the Texas Water Development Board with Freese and Nichols to determine priorities and funding amount for the March 3, 2023, submission deadline.]
AND IT'S ITEM NUMBER ONE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS TO DETERMINE THE PRIORITIES AND FUNDING AMOUNT FOR THE MARCH 3RD, 2023 SUBMISSION DEADLINE.CHRIS, I'LL TOSS IT TO YOU AND YOU COULD TOSS IT TO THEM.
SO WE'RE LOOKING FOR YOUR THOUGHTS AND OBVIOUSLY DIRECTION OUT OF THIS.
SO TO PUT IT IN CONTEXT, WE HAVE A MARCH 3RD DEADLINE.
THAT'S WHY WE'RE KIND OF DOING IT RIGHT NOW.
SO WE'RE NOT JAMMED UP AGAINST A LINE.
AND REALLY, THIS IS OUR THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO TO FIX SORT OF THE PRIORITY THINGS AND OR PART OF THINGS FOR NOW.
THE CHALLENGE IS IF WE HAVE SECOND THOUGHTS, LIKE WE SUBMIT THIS THING FOR $15 MILLION INSTEAD OF $36 OR $38 MILLION, YOU CAN'T PUT IT BACK IN. YOU HAVE TO WAIT TILL NEXT YEAR TO DO THAT.
AND SO THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF THE DIRECTION WE NEED.
COME BACK AND SAY, YES, WE WANT TO DO THIS.
NO, WE DON'T. FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S SOME SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC THINGS.
IF WE FIND OTHER WAYS TO FUND IT, WE CAN PULL SOME STUFF OUT AND SAY WE'RE NOT GOING TO TAKE THE MONEY, BUT IT'S BETTER TO GO IN HIGH FOR EVERYTHING THAT WE THINK WE NEED BASED ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS.
AND AND THIS IS REALLY IT'S A AHDR PRODUCT.
SO WE ASKED THEM A YEAR OR SO AGO TO PRIORITIZE THIS.
WE CAME UP WITH $400 MILLION WORTH OF STUFF THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE IN THE WATER AND WASTEWATER.
AND SO WE'RE REALLY PICKING ON THE CRUCIAL STUFF THAT NEEDS TO GET DONE AND THE END RESULT IS RATE INCREASE IN EITHER WATER AND OR WASTEWATER DEPENDING ON WHAT THE FLAVOR OF THE PROJECTS ARE, SO THAT THAT CAN BE DONE AT A LATER TIME.
SO FREESE NICHOLS HAS GOT THEY WANT TO TALK SORT OF TALK YOU THROUGH THIS AND KIND OF REFRESH THIS.
AND AT THE END OF DAY, WE'RE LOOKING FOR SOME ACTION TO MOVE THIS FORWARD AND SEE WHERE IT GOES.
OKAY. ALL RIGHT, MR. POPE, IT'S ALL YOURS.
YES, SIR. SO YOU SHOULD HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU SHOULD BE AN AGENDA, A SET OF HARD COPY SLIDES.
AND THEN JUST KIND OF A REFRESHER ON THE CIP.
AGAIN, THIS IS WORKSHOP NUMBER ONE.
THIS IS MEANT TO BE A CONTINUED DIALOG, BUT THERE'S TWO OBJECTIVES REALLY OUT OF THIS WORKSHOP.
AND THEN KIND OF THE SECOND OBJECTIVE OF THE WORKSHOP IS TO KIND OF GO THROUGH SOME OF THE PARAMETERS, WHICH WE'LL GET INTO MORE DETAIL OF KIND OF WHERE THE CITY, WHAT WE'RE LOOKING, WHAT DIRECTION WE'RE LOOKING TO TAKE AS FAR AS THE CITY IS GOING.
SO I WANT TO FLIP OVER TO SLIDE NUMBER FOUR PAGE TWO, WHICH IS THE BACKGROUND.
SO JUST KIND OF PAINTING THE PAINT THE PICTURE HERE.
SO WE KNOW THE CITY HAS A GROWTH.
AND THEN, OF COURSE, OUR PROBLEM SET THAT WE HAVE HERE TODAY IN FRONT OF US IS WE'RE TRYING TO ALSO ADDRESS KIND OF AN AGING WATER WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FOR OUR CURRENT CAPACITY. YOU'LL SEE ON A LOT OF OUR CIP PLAN, WE HAVE TONS OF LIFT STATION REHABS.
[00:05:06]
WE'VE GOT A VERY LARGE WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, SANITARY SEWER REHAB PROGRAM.THERE'S TONS OF ITEMS THAT WE WANT TO GET ADDRESSED.
BUT THE FOCUS OF THIS WORKSHOP IS TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE PRECISE.
OBVIOUSLY, THERE'S A LOT OF PROJECTS, BUT WE'RE TRYING TO TAKE ONE BITE AT A TIME.
JUST GOT A COUPLE OF PEOPLE ON LINE, RIGHT? YES, SIR. THAT'S ON ME.
SO JUST I MISSED THE INTRODUCTION.
SO I'M DUSTIN POPE. IF YOU DON'T KNOW ME WITH FREESE AND NICHOLS.
CHUCK WOLFE AND MARK EVANS, ALSO FROM FREESE AND NICHOLS.
DEBORAH JONES FROM SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC.
AND THEN WE HAVE ON THE LINE, WE'VE GOT [INAUDIBLE] AND RICH HEINEY, BOTH ALSO FROM FREESE NICHOLS.
THAT WOULD BE PART OF OUR STAFF.
THEY HAVE SOME BACKGROUND IN WASTEWATER INFRASTRUCTURE, MASTER PLANNING EXPERTISE.
AND THEN WE ALSO HAVE JOHN PETERSON ON THE LINE FROM HDR.
SO JUST A QUICK SNAPSHOT OF THE PROGRAM OVERVIEW.
SO KIND OF A CONCERTED EFFORT AMONGST OUR TEAM HERE.
SO HDR FINALIZED A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.
SNYDER IS REVIEWING THE OPERATIONAL ENERGY SAVINGS ACROSS THE CITY.
AND THEN FOR PHASE ONE, WE'RE REALLY LOOKING AT WHERE WE CAN ASSIST WITH THE GRANT AND FUNDING.
AND SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE KIND OF IN THAT WHAT WE CALL PRE APPLICATION PHASE.
SO OBVIOUSLY GETTING TO THE PIFS AND GETTING THINGS SUBMITTED AND DOING THE APPLICATIONS.
SO OUR GOAL IS TO GET THROUGH THE THROUGH THE GRANT AND FUNDING ASSISTING PHASE TODAY.
CAN JUST KIND OF SEE THE DRILL DOWN FOR FREESE AND NICHOLS.
SO MARK EVANS, WHO'S HERE TONIGHT, HE'S HE'S OUR GRANT KIND OF SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT.
WE ALSO HAVE RICHARD CAMPBELL AS WE START GETTING INTO RATE IMPACTS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
HE'S HE'S ONE OF OUR FINANCIAL PLANNERS.
SO NOW THIS IS WHERE I'M GOING TO I'M GOING TO BRING MARK UP HERE IN A SECOND.
OBVIOUSLY, OYSTER CREEK TREATMENT PLANT REHAB WAS AT THE VERY TOP OF THAT LIST.
WE IDENTIFIED OUT OF THE SANITARY SEWER, REHAB AND WATERLINE REPLACEMENT PROGRAMS. WE'RE LOOKING AT BALLPARK ABOUT $5 MILLION.
AND AGAIN, IF YOU LOOK AT HENDERSON TRANSMISSION LINE, WHICH IS THE THIRD BULLET NUMBER FOUR, THAT'S ABOUT $3.7, IF YOU INCLUDE THE CHENANGO BOOSTER PUMP BUILDING AND DISINFECTION ROOM.
AND THAT'S ABOUT 10,000 LINEAR FEET OF FORCE MAIN, 12 INCH FORCE MAIN.
SO THAT JUST KIND OF GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF OF WHAT YOU CAN WHAT YOU CAN BITE OFF.
AND THEN AS WE WERE LOOKING THROUGH THE LIFT STATION PACKAGES, WE THOUGHT IT MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA FOR ECONOMIES OF SCALE IF WE COULD COMBINE LIFT STATIONS, REHABS AS A PACKAGE. THAT WAY YOU GET SOME BIGGER CONTRACTORS, YOU'RE GETTING POTENTIALLY A BETTER PHASING PLAN BECAUSE IT ALSO MATTERS WHERE THESE LIFT STATIONS SIT, WHAT SYSTEM THEY'RE ON. SO THESE ARE JUST WHAT WE CAME UP WITH, WHICH IS ALSO WHY I INCLUDED THE OVERARCHING CIP.
AND THIS IS TODAY'S DOLLARS, RIGHT? YES, SIR. THIS IS IN TODAY'S DOLLARS.
WHICH WILL NOT BE IN TOMORROW'S DOLLARS.
AND THIS IS THIS IS CONSTRUCTION VALUE.
AND THERE'S SOME FLEXIBILITY IN THERE.
IF YOU WANT TO DO LESS WATER LINE OR LESS SEWER LINE.
WE CAN TRIM SOME NUMBERS BACK, BUT.
I MEAN, THERE'S DIFFERENT VARIATIONS THAT WE COULD TAKE ON ON HOW WE SUBMIT OUR PIFS.
SO THAT WOULD BE YOUR INFLUENT LIFT STATION, YOUR MCC OPERATOR BUILDING, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
[00:10:04]
SO IT WOULDN'T BE THE FULL REHAB, BUT IT WOULD AT LEAST BE A PHASE OF THE FULL REHAB.AND UNDER ONE IS THE SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC BOB PROJECTS.
DO YOU WANT TO? ARE YOU WANTING US TO ASK QUESTIONS NOW? I WAS TRYING TO BE QUIET AND WAIT UNTIL YOU'RE FINISHED WITH THE PRESENTATION.
IT'S A WORKSHOP. YOU CAN I JUST WANTED YOU TO GET EVERYTHING OUT THAT YOU WERE TRYING TO GET OUT BEFORE I STARTED.
OH, YEAH? YEAH. WE DEFINITELY WANT TO HEAR FROM THE COUNCIL FOR SURE.
OKAY. FIRST QUESTION IS THE HENDERSON TRANSMISSION LINE NUMBER FOUR, $3.7 MILLION ON THE TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD SLIDE IT SHOWS $3.7 THEN YOU GO TO THE PACKAGE EXAMPLE AND IT SHOWS $2.1.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE TWO? SO THAT TAKES OUT THE CHENANGO BOOSTER PUMP BUILDING AND DISINFECTION.
THAT'S WHAT I WAS ASSUMING. SO THE DIFFERENCE OF THAT IS THE CHENANGO.
YES. THEN IN THE STATION REHAB, HOW MUCH OF THAT DID WE HAVE EARMARKED FOR FUNDING FROM THE RESCUE PLAN? SO WE WE DID HALF A MILLION DOLLARS AND [INAUDIBLE].
THEN THAT MONEY BECOMES AVAILABLE FOR SOMETHING ELSE.
SO UNDER THIS, WE WOULDN'T PROBABLY SEE THE MONEY FOR A YEAR AND A HALF AND THEN DESIGN AND ALL THAT STUFF, RIGHT? SO THEN SOME OF THIS WOULD WE'VE ALREADY EARMARKED FOR SOME OF THESE LIFT STATIONS WOULD JUST MIGHT AS WELL JUST GO THROUGH WITH THOSE.
[INAUDIBLE] EXCUSE ME. LET'S CLEAR UP MY CONFUSION.
BUT I THOUGHT WE WERE ALREADY REHABILITATING LIFT STATION NUMBER SEVEN OR A COUPLE OF THESE.
SO THEY SHOULD COME OFF THIS LIST.
YES, SIR. YEAH, THIS WAS JUST.
THIS WAS MEANT TO BE YES, SIR. SO WHICH ONES DO WE GET TO TAKE OFF THE LIST.
SO I CAN WORK WITH JEFF AND CHRIS TO MAKE SURE.
BECAUSE THE INTENT WAS THAT WE PACKAGED UP A SERIES OF STATION REHABS THAT GOT US TO SOMEWHERE IN THAT $2 TO$ 3 MILLION BALLPARK TO MAKE US SO THAT WHEN WE PUT IT OUT FOR BID, WE GET KIND OF A BIGGER CONTRACT.
WE JUST CHANGED SOME NUMBERS JUST FOR THAT.
GOOD. CAN YOU BE REIMBURSED? SO IF YOU WERE TO GO AHEAD AND START THIS ON THESE TWO LIFT STATIONS AND THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN WE GET THE GRANT, WE'RE IN THE MIDDLE OF CONSTRUCTION ON THESE TWO OR REHABBING THEM OR FIXING THEM.
CAN WE APPLY THAT MONEY TO IT AND PAY OURSELVES BACK ON THE ARPA SIDE AND USE THAT FOR SOMETHING ELSE? LIKE IT'S FEDERAL ON TOP OF FEDERAL BECAUSE THE TWO SRF PROGRAMS THAT I'LL SPEAK TO IN A LITTLE BIT, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO USE THOSE TOGETHER.
SO YOU REALLY NEED TO DECIDE TIMING WISE.
YOU HAVE THE ARPA MONEY NOW THE SRF MONIES, WHICH I'LL SPEAK TO IN A SECOND IS STILL AN UNKNOWN.
AND SO YOU LOOK AT YOUR NEED AND YOU MIGHT WANT TO GO AHEAD AND APPLY YOUR ARPA NEEDS NOW, MAINLY BASED ON THE FACT THAT REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU USE YOUR ARPA MONEY FUNDING, YOU'VE GOT THOSE HARD DEADLINES TO MEET.
SO I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE ABLE TO REIMBURSE ON THAT.
NOW AGAIN, I'LL SPEAK TO THIS MORE IN PROCESS, BUT IF YOU WORK AHEAD OF THE WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD FUNDING, THEN THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO REIMBURSE ONCE THE BOARD'S FUNDING CATCHES UP WITH YOU.
FOR INSTANCE, WHAT IF YOU'RE WORKING ON DESIGN ALREADY? BUT THE BOARD'S JUST FUNDING PLANNING AT THE TIME, SO ONCE THEY APPROVE YOUR PLANNING, THEN THE MONEY CAN BE RELEASED FOR YOUR DESIGN.
EVERYTHING CAN BE KIND OF DONE IN ARREARS OR REIMBURSED UNTIL YOU GET TO CONSTRUCTION.
AND THAT'S A HARD ONE RIGHT THERE, BECAUSE UNTIL YOU GET YOUR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE, YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO STICK A SHOVEL IN THE GROUND BECAUSE THAT COMPLICATES THINGS HEAVILY. SO I'LL STOP THERE WITH THE PROCESS.
NO, GREAT. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WAS ASKING.
THANK YOU. NEXT QUESTION IS AROUND THE
[00:15:04]
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, THE $20.6 MILLION, YOU DON'T HAVE IT BROKEN OUT, ON THE SECOND SLIDE YOU DO, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE NUMBERS TO THOSE, RIGHT? IF LET'S SAY WE WERE ONLY GET 50% OF THIS, ARE THERE RECOMMENDATIONS IN HERE THAT WILL SHOW THESE ARE THE THESE ARE THE TOP ITEMS YOU HAVE TO DO INSIDE HERE JUST TO GIVE US AN IDEA OF WHERE WE NEED TO GO AND HOW MUCH FUNDING WE HAVE.WE ACTUALLY HAVE TO BREAK OUT.
SO WE DO HAVE A PRIORITIZATION WITHIN THE PRIORITY.
PRIORITY NUMBER ONE. YES, SIR.
OKAY. THAT'D BE INTERESTING TO SEE JUST HOW MUCH WHAT THE REQUIREMENTS WOULD BE.
I MIGHT BE MISSING. BUT WHAT DOES W-L REPLACEMENT? WATERLINE. WATERLINE REPLACEMENT.
WE'RE KIND OF DOING THAT ALREADY, RIGHT? WE'RE REPLACING WATER LINES ALL THE TIME IN OUR CURRENT OPERATIONAL BUDGET.
MM HMM. OH, WELL, THAT'S USUALLY WHENEVER A CONTRACTOR HITS THEM.
SOUTHAMPTON. SO I WANT TO I WANT TO CLARIFY A COMMENT.
SO THERE MAY BE SOME GREEN ORIENTED GRANTS, BUT IT'S IT'S LARGELY LOANS.
BUT THAT WORKS AGAINST US IN IN THIS FUNDING PIECE.
THAT'S TRUE. I WON'T USE THE WORD GRANT ANYMORE.
NOT SAYING YOU CAN'T USE IT. I'M JUST SAYING TO PUT IT IN CONTEXT.
WELL, WE NEVER GET THEM ANYWAY, SO I JUST WON'T USE IT.
BUT I GUESS THE QUESTION ON THE WATER LINE REPLACEMENT, WHAT WOULD BE THE NECESSITY FOR REPLACING ALL OF THE WATER LINE OR $5 MILLION WORTH OF WATER LINES AT ONE TIME? WOULDN'T THAT BE IN HOW MANY YEARS DO YOU THINK THAT WOULD TAKE? JUST GOING RIPPING UP THE CITY AND REPLACING THESE THINGS.
SO TO PUT IT, I GUESS TO PUT IT INTO CONTEXT.
SO WITH $5 MILLION, YOU'RE PROBABLY GETTING 1 TO 3 PACKAGES OF WATER LINE PROJECTS, IN MY OPINION.
BUT THAT'S DRIVEWAY AND THAT'S PAVEMENT.
THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING I COULD SEE THE TIME LINE OF THAT JUST DRAGGING OUT FOR.
YEAH, WELL, AND AGAIN, IT'S NOT JUST ALL WATER LINE.
YEAH. WOULD HENDERSON TRANSMISSION LINE GET US STARTED ON OUR HENDERSON ROAD PROJECT.
YEAH JOHN THAT'S THAT'S A DIFFERENT, DIFFERENT AREA ALTOGETHER THAT, THAT ONE'S TAKEN A WATER LINE FROM THE HENDERSON WATER PLANT BASICALLY DOWN A DRAINAGE DITCH EASEMENT THAT WE'VE TALKED TO, THE DRAINAGE DITCH ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE CHENANGO TO GET AN INDEPENDENT FILL LINE THAT'LL BE PVC AND THEN IT'LL ALLOW YOU TO UTILIZE THE EXISTING OLDER LINE AS A FILL ON FROM YOUR WELLS WHENEVER YOU NEED TO RUN YOUR WELLS.
I KNOW WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.
THAT'S RIGHT. BUT KIND OF YOUR QUESTION, JOHN, OR LET ME ASK JOHN PETERSON.
SO DOING THAT IS, IS THAT UNDER THE WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD? WHAT'S THE THE THE LINE FROM THE FILL LINE FROM ONE ONE PLANT TO THE OTHER WOULD BE A WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD.
THE WATER LINES ALONG HENDERSON ARE THE ONES THAT WERE IDENTIFIED.
MOST OF THEM ARE ALREADY DONE.
THE SANITARY SEWER NEEDS TO BE DONE.
THAT WILL BE PART OF OUR TIP APPLICATION HTAC.
[00:20:02]
. SO AN UPDATE ON THAT AND MARK CAN PROBABLY TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE, BUT TEXT WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD IS WORKING ON A FUNDING PROGRAM.BOTH LOANS, LOW INTEREST LOANS AND THOSE KIND OF THINGS HELP FIX THAT.
BUT THEIR NORMAL PROGRAMS, THEY HAVE A WATER AND WASTE PROGRAM THEY CALL THE STATE REVOLVING FUNDS CLEAN WATER STATE REVOLVING FUND FOR WASTEWATER, DRINKING WATER FOR POTABLE WATER. AND THOSE ARE FROM EBA THROUGH MONEY PROVIDED BY CONGRESS AND ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS.
IT'S NOW EXPLODED IN THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT IT HAS AVAILABLE BECAUSE OF THE IJA, WHICH MADE US ALL EXCITED EXCEPT CONGRESS ATTACHED THIS PESKY LITTLE THING CALLED 49% MUST GO TO DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES.
SO AND IT'S NOT A SLIDING SCALE.
IT'S NOT AT LEAST THIS MUCH UP TO THIS MUCH IT IS 49%.
NOW, THE SCORING CRITERIA IS GOING TO FAVOR PLANTS THAT ARE UNDER ENFORCEMENT.
AND TCU HAS PROGRAMS THEY'RE TRYING TO CLEAN UP THE WATER.
I HATE TO SAY IT, I USED TO ANSWER THIS QUESTION ALL THE TIME DURING MY NINE YEARS AT THE BOARD.
BUT UNFORTUNATELY RIGHT NOW THAT'S THE SCORING CRITERIA WE HAVE.
NOW THE MARCH 3RD DEADLINE IS JUST FOR THOSE TWO PROGRAMS. SO ANYTHING WASTEWATER WOULD BE CLEAN WATER AND DRINKING WATER WOULD BE FOR THE DRINKING WATER PROJECTS YOU SEE THERE ANY WATER LINE PROJECTS.
NOW, CHRIS MENTIONED THIS EARLIER, BUT I WANT TO REINFORCE IT.
THE CITY WOULD HAVE ZERO COMMITMENT ZERO UNTIL YOU GO TO CLOSE ALONE.
IT TAKES THE BETTER PART OF A YEAR TO GET THROUGH ALL OF THAT AT ANY POINT IN TIME THAT YOU SAY, WE DON'T WANT TO DO THE WHOLE OYSTER CREEK AT $20 MILLION, WE WANT TO DO HALF OF IT, THAT'S FINE. YOU CAN ALWAYS GO DOWN.
BUT IF YOU DON'T ASK FOR A LARGE ENOUGH NUMBER WHEN YOU SUBMIT THESE PIFS, BECAUSE THE BOARD THEN TAKES ITS AVAILABLE MONEY AND SCORES AND RANKS THESE PROJECTS, THEY CAN'T GIVE YOU MORE MONEY, NOT IN THESE PROGRAMS. NOW, ONE OF THE THINGS I WANTED TO BRING TO THE COUNCIL'S ATTENTION IS THE BOARD HAS OTHER PROGRAMS. THERE'S ONE CALLED THE WATER DEVELOPMENT FUND, WHICH HAS A LOT OF MONEY.
THE DOWNSIDE IS THERE'S NO GRANT FOR GREEN AND THE INTEREST RATES ARE NOT SUBSIDIZED.
WHAT HAPPENS IS THE BOARD SELLS BONDS TO FUND THESE FOR THE D FUND, THEY CALL IT AT A TRIPLE-A RATE.
AND SO YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO DO WATER AND WASTE ALL IN ONE LOAN.
IN THE SRF PROGRAMS. YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SPLIT IT INTO TWO BECAUSE THE FEDS MANDATE YOU SPLIT THOSE TWO PROGRAMS UP.
DOES THAT MAKE MORE SENSE ON WHY WE HAVE BIGGER NUMBERS HERE AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT AND AGAIN, I WANT TO STRESS AT THE TIME OF YOU GET INVITED AND SUBMIT AN APPLICATION, YOU CAN SAY TAKE OUT THE LIFT STATIONS ONE AND FIVE.
IT'S FINALIZED AND THOSE ARE COMPLETED SO WE'RE TAKING THAT OUT.
SO IF THAT DOES THAT, CAN I ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ON JUST PROCESS AND WHAT THAT'S ABOUT? NOW, THE D FUND PROCESS IS DIFFERENT.
THEY DON'T HAVE THIS TWO STEP PROCESS.
TELL THEM WHAT YOU'RE INTERESTED IN.
BUT OTHER THAN THAT, YOU CAN APPLY IT ANY TIME.
SO THAT'S A LITTLE MORE FLEXIBLE, NOT QUITE AS CHEAP.
THE REASON WE GO FOR SRF IS IT'S GOT AN UPCOMING DEADLINE AND YOU COULD GET BETTER SAVINGS.
NOW, I KNOW A COUPLE OF YOU HAVE SOME FINANCIAL ACUMEN HERE.
[00:25:05]
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE GRANT AND THE LOAN, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT LOW INTEREST LOAN, THE GRANT, YOU'RE GOING TO GET IT UP FRONT, RIGHT? SO IF YOU GO TO FEMA AND TRY TO GET A GRANT FOR A STORM WATER PROJECT, 75% GRANT, 25% LOCAL MATCH, IT'S PRETTY EASY.IF IT'S SUBSIDIZED INTEREST RATE, YOU JUST AMORTIZE THAT OVER THE LIFE OF THE LOAN 20, 25, 30 YEARS.
BUT IT'S THE SAME. YOU JUST GET THAT GRANT RECURRING EVERY YEAR IN THE SAVINGS THAT YOU HAVE.
AND THEN WHEN YOU COUPLE THAT TOGETHER WITH THINGS LIKE IMPACT FEES OR EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS.
SO I'LL STOP THERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
I COULD SEE THERE WAS A LITTLE CONFUSION AS TO, OKAY, WAIT A MINUTE, BECAUSE YOU START GETTING NERVOUS WHEN YOU SEE 36 MILLION, RIGHT? SAY NO, WAIT A MINUTE. DO WE NEED TO DO ALL OF THAT NOW? WELL, YOU CAN PULL IT OUT AT ANY TIME.
QUESTION, THOUGH, WHAT WOULD YOU WHAT IS COMMON FOR MOST CITIES THAT YOU'VE SEEN ARE WHICH WHICH ROUTE ARE THEY NORMALLY GOING? WELL, THESE DAYS, IT'S EXACTLY THIS PATH I'M WORKING ON CITY OF ARLINGTON RIGHT NOW.
WE'RE DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THING.
WE ARE TAKING A LIST OF THE PROJECTS THAT THEY WANT TO GET DONE.
IT'S ON THEIR CIP. IT'S HIGH PRIORITY.
WE ARE SUBMITTING GIFTS AND WE'RE GOING TO FOCUS REAL HARD.
THE SCORING CRITERIA IS MOSTLY SUBJECTIVE.
YOU'RE EITHER UNDER ENFORCEMENT OR YOU'RE NOT.
YOU'RE EITHER DISCHARGING TO A 303 STREAM OR YOU'RE NOT.
BUT YOU TRY TO COUPLE THOSE TOGETHER.
AND I WAS GOING TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT FOR DUSTIN.
TALK ABOUT PACKAGING THE WASTEWATER ALTOGETHER.
SOMETIMES YOU CAN SAY, WELL, OYSTER CREEK IS NEARING CAPACITY.
IT'S AT SOME LEVEL 75% CAPACITY, 90% CAPACITY.
THEY DON'T ALWAYS HAVE THAT ABILITY.
AND NOW YOU'RE PUTTING TOGETHER A WHOLE PACKAGE AND THE BOARD LIKES TO SEE THAT THEY WOULD RATHER DO A PROGRAM OF THINGS THAT HELP YOUR SYSTEM OVERALL THAN JUST INDIVIDUAL PIECES. AND TOO MANY TOO MANY TIMES THEY SEE JUST THOSE INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS COME THROUGH.
SO YOU'RE DOING EXACTLY WHAT I'M RECOMMENDING WE DO IN OTHER IN OTHER COMMUNITIES AS WELL.
UNFORTUNATELY, THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO ASK TO THE IIJ.
CHRIS WANTED ME TO MENTION THE THE LEAD SERVICE LINE REPLACEMENT.
THE BOARD HAS OVER 200 MILLION THIS YEAR TO SPEND.
IT IS DIVIDED EXACTLY LIKE THE BASE PROGRAM, 49% GRANT, 51% LOAN.
BUT AT THE BOARD'S CONFERENCE, THE WATER FOR TEXAS CONFERENCE A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, THEY OUTLINED PRELIMINARILY BEFORE THEY RELEASE AUP, THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE EVERY PROJECT 49% GRANT, 51% LOAN.
SO EVERY PROJECT YOU DO ON THAT WILL BE SPLIT EXACTLY LIKE THAT.
STILL WAITING FOR THAT CALL FOR PROJECTS.
AND WHEN IT DOES COME IN, ONE OF THE BIGGEST, BIGGEST BENEFITS AND I THINK THIS IS WHAT MADE CHRIS RAISE AN EYEBROW UNDER THE BASE PROGRAM.
THE BOARD DEFINES A DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITY AS A COMMUNITY THAT HAS A MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME THAT IS 75% OF THE STATE'S MEDIAN INCOME OR LESS FOR THE LEAD SERVICE LINES. THEY REDEFINED IT 150%.
IT'S JUST A MATTER OF HOW FAR WILL THAT 200 MILLION GO.
OF 200 MILLION AVAILABLE THIS YEAR PLUS FOUR AND MORE.
AND IT'S FOR INVENTORIES, IT'S FOR REPLACEMENT OF THOSE LINES, THE WHOLE SHOOTING MATCH.
NOW, CHRIS SAID YOU'RE ALREADY UNDER AN INVENTORY.
[00:30:01]
THAT'S GREAT. ONE OF THE SCORING CRITERIA IS YOU'VE ALREADY DONE YOUR INVENTORY AND YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR LINES ARE.THAT'S GOING TO GET YOU POINTS IN THIS PROGRAM.
GOOD. BUT IT'S A SEPARATE IEP, A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL.
AND WHAT'S THE INTEREST RATE RIGHT NOW THAT YOU'RE SEEING? YOU KNOW, I HAVEN'T LOOKED IN A WHILE SINCE I HAVEN'T CLOSED A LOAN SINCE SEPTEMBER, BUT I WANT TO SAY IT'S OVER 4% RIGHT NOW FOR THE STANDARD RATES.
JUST WONDERING WHAT THE LOW INTEREST RATE WAS GOING TO BE.
YEAH. YEAH. NO, IT'S IT'S LOWER.
AND I THINK THAT YOUR RATING IS LIKE A PLUS MINUS DOUBLE-A, MINUS SOME DOUBLE-A SOMETHING.
RIGHT. SO WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO USE, THEY USE THE THOMSON REUTERS MUNICIPAL MARKET DATA SCALE AS THEIR SCALE AND THEY'LL GO IN AND SAY, OKAY, ANGLETON ON A 20 YEAR LOAN, YOUR DOUBLE-A EVEN WE'LL CALL IT, THEY SUBTRACT, THEY TAKE ALL OF THOSE RATES, BUT THEY SUBTRACT 40% OFF OF THAT AND THAT'S YOUR LOAN RATE THAT YOU REPAY.
NOW, THE D FUND STILL IS A SAVINGS FROM DOUBLE-A TO TRIPLE-A.
SO YOU'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE A SAVINGS, JUST NOT AS MUCH AS 40% OFF YOUR AA.
WELL, WHEN WE HAD DONE THIS THREE YEARS AGO.
NOW THE SAVINGS IS JUST THE DIFFERENCE OF THE INTEREST RATE HIKES OVER THE LAST YEAR.
SO ONE OF THE THINGS WE'RE ADDRESSING UNDER THE OYSTER CREEK REHAB IS SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC.
BUT THE FIVE PROJECTS THEY HAVE, SO SO IN THE SCHEME OF WE'RE NOT GOING TO SAVE ENERGY.
RIGHT. SO WE BOUGHT ENERGY AT THREE AND ONE HALF CENTS THREE YEARS AGO.
OUR CONTRACT ENDS IN SEVEN YEARS.
SO IN SEVEN YEARS, I MEAN, $0.16, $0.20, FIVE.
WE'RE JUST GOING TO REDUCE THE COST OF THE INCREASE FOR ELECTRICITY.
AND AND SO WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE PROGRAMS, YOU KNOW, WE'RE SEVEN YEARS OUT, BUT BY THE TIME WE FUND DESIGN, EXECUTE, WE'RE GOING TO BE GETTING TOWARD THE END OF THAT.
MARK BROUGHT UP A POINT JUST A MOMENT AGO THAT I CLUED IN ON.
GETTING THE MONEY IS GOING TO TAKE A LONG TIME.
AND DURING THIS PERIOD THAT WE'RE WAITING TO GET THE MONEY, THE SEWER PLANT IS NOT HEALING ITSELF.
IT'S JUST GETTING WORSE AND WORSE.
THE STUFF THAT IS DECAYING IS ROTTING AND WORSENING.
TO TAKE THE HEAT AS MUCH AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.
IT BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE HARDER AND HARDER THE LONGER WE WAIT TO DO TO DO THESE THINGS.
THERE ARE PARTS OF TOWN WHERE THERE'S MULTIPLE PLACES HERE IN TOWN THAT NEED WATER LINES REPLACED.
WHEN YOU START DEALING WITH DOWNTOWN AREAS.
THOSE ARE GOING TO BE WAY MORE COSTLY WHEN YOU WALK DOWN VELASCO STREET.
DO YOU SEE ANY DIRT ANYWHERE? NO. IT'S CONCRETE FROM WALL TO WALL.
SO YOU HAVE TO TAKE THE PAVEMENT UP.
YOU GOT TO GET DOWN THERE AND GET TO IT.
OR GET TO A SPOT TO PUT A NEW ONE AND TRANSFER THE SERVERS FROM THE OLD WATER TO THE NEW WATER.
THAT'S A LOT OF THE MINUTIA THAT IS VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE.
THE LINE THAT GOES BETWEEN THE HENDERSON ROAD PLANT AND THE SHENANGO PLANT NOW.
WILL THAT LINE BE ABLE TO BE CONTINUED IN SOME SORT OF USE OR IS IT JUST GOING TO GET TOTALLY ABANDONED? NO, IT'LL BE IN USE.
THAT WAY. YOU ALWAYS HAVE TREATED WATER IN THE IN THE MAIN THAT GOES FROM PLANT TO PLANT.
[00:35:06]
AND YOU HAVE RAW WATER IN THAT IN THAT ONE.AND NOT NOT KIND OF A COMBINATION WHEN YOU FLIP OVER FROM ONE TO THE OTHER.
OKAY. THANK YOU. SO COUNCILMAN BOOTH'S POINT.
I THOUGHT IT MAY BE HELPFUL FROM THE DISCUSSION OF WHAT YOU WANT TO TAKE ON TO AT LEAST HAVE SOME IDEA OF HOW YOU SIT WITH YOUR PEERS ON YOUR CURRENT RATE STRUCTURE AND WHAT KIND OF SPACE YOU MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE AND HOW YOU GUYS WANT TO LOOK AT THAT.
BUT WHERE YOU CAN START TO DIVE INTO DIFFERENT STRATEGIES AROUND DIFFERENT PROJECTS THAT YOU COULD OR COULDN'T TAKE DOWN, AND EVEN SOME UPDATES WE MAY NEED TO HAVE TO SOME OF THE NUMBERS ON THESE GIVEN SOME OF THE FEEDBACK THAT WE'VE GOT WORK WE'RE STILL DOING.
SLIDE TEN, PAGE FIVE OF YOUR OF YOUR HANDOUT, YOU WANT TO SEE A LITTLE BIT CLOSER.
SO RIGHT NOW ANGLETON IS 5000 GALLONS PER MONTH, SORT OF $63.42 A MONTH.
BILL, YOU'LL SEE THAT OTHER CITIES THAT ARE STARTING TO EXPERIENCE SIGNIFICANT GROWTH LIKE ALVIN, RICHWOOD, MANVILLE, EVEN PEARLAND, ARE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN YOU CURRENTLY.
I THINK PARALLEL IS THE CLOSEST AT 7631 IN THAT RESPECT, AND THEY ARE LOOKING AT SUBSTANTIAL RATE INCREASES FOR THE PROGRAMS THAT THEY'RE HAVING TO PUT IN PLACE TO.
SO ONE MORAL OF THE STORY IS YOU WOULDN'T BE THE ONLY ONES HAVING TO DO RATE INCREASES, RIGHT? IT'S THE DATA POINT THAT I REMEMBER FROM A LONG TIME AGO IS THAT ABOUT 95% OF THE UNITED STATES WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE WAS PUT IN BY LOCAL MONEY.
AND THAT DATA IS PROBABLY EVEN HIGHER NOW.
IT'S PROBABLY MORE 97 OR 98% BECAUSE THAT INCLUDED THE CONSTRUCTION GRANTS ERA.
AND WE WERE A LOT CLOSER WHEN I GOT THAT DATA POINT.
BUT ONCE AGAIN, MANVILLE IS CONSIDERING A 17% RATE INCREASE.
SO THEY GO FROM $104 TO RIGHT AROUND 120 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
BUT SORT OF THE POINT HERE IS YOU'RE NOT GOING TO NECESSARILY PRICE YOURSELF OUT OF THE MARKET IF YOU MAKE A RATE ADJUSTMENT, AT LEAST BASED UPON THE CURRENT DATA, WHERE WE SEE THE TRAJECTORY OF THINGS GOING.
THERE'S JUST A LOT OF GROWTH COMING AT YOU.
YOU'VE GOT OLDER SYSTEMS THAT ALSO HAVE TO BE UPGRADED, SO YOU'VE GOT TO KILL TWO BIRDS.
SO AND THAT'S WHERE, AS MARK SAID, HOPEFULLY WE CAN GET CREATIVE IN THE WAY WE PACKAGE THESE PROJECTS UP AND TRY TO FIND SOME ARGUMENTS THAT SAY, YES, THE SYSTEM IS WORKING, IT'S NOT UNDER ENFORCEMENT.
BUT IF WE LET IT GO MUCH FURTHER, IT COULD BE UNDER ENFORCEMENT.
AND WE WANT TO TRY TO AVOID THAT AND TRY TO USE THAT TO STRENGTHEN THE ARGUMENTS.
THE ISSUE IS WE DON'T CONTROL OUR OWN WATER RATE TO SOME EXTENT.
IT'S FORCED ON US FROM BWA WITH THEIR PRICE INCREASES AS WELL.
SO WHATEVER WE TAKE ON, WE'RE ALSO AT THE WHIM OF WHAT BWA PASSES ON TO US AS WELL.
IT WAS ACTUALLY THE SECOND HIGHEST, I BELIEVE, IN THIS GRAPH OF THE CITIES, AND THAT'S BECAUSE WE'RE TAKING ON A MORE PROPORTIONALLY MORE WATER COST THAN MOST OF THE OTHER CITIES. AND OUR SEWER IS ACTUALLY THE SMALLER PIECE.
SO WE ACTUALLY IF THERE WAS A NEED TO INVEST AND RAISE RATE, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE TO ME WOULD BE MOST LIKELY TO DO THAT ON THE WASTEWATER SIDE, ALTHOUGH THE RATES KIND OF TOGETHER IN THE COMPARISON, THAT'S JUST WHAT JUMPED OUT AT ME INSTANTLY WAS JUST THE DIFFERENCE OF THAT.
FORTUNATELY, THERE'S A LOT OF THERE'S A LOT OF EXPENSE IN THE TABLE THAT'S RELATED TO WASTEWATER.
SO AND THAT'S I THINK YOU'VE GOT THE JUSTIFICATION, RIGHT? YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. YOU CAN MAKE THERE.
BUT IT ALSO BEGS THE QUESTION OF WHY IS OUR COST STRUCTURE SO OFF FROM THE OTHER CITIES IN WATER? YEAH, I THINK YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD.
[00:40:02]
COST AND IT'S NOT BASED OUT.SO IT'S IT'S GOING TO BE BASED UPON HOW MANY GALLONS YOU USE.
RIGHT. AND WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT.
AND WE CAN TRY TO LOOK AT HOW WE CAN LEVEL IN THE.
WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO DO FOR THE RATES TO MATCH THE WASTEWATER SIDE OF THE SPEND.
RIGHT. LET'S LOOK AS WE COMPARE VOLUMETRIC RATES, FREEPORT, CLUTE, LAKE JACKSON AND RICHWOOD.
ALL FOUR GET THE MAJORITY OF THEIR WATER FROM THE BWA.
WE'RE NOT THE LONE WOLF IN THIS COMPARATIVE.
STUFF HERE. SO FREEPORT GETS ALL THEIR WATER FROM BWA AND I DON'T KNOW THE PROPORTION THAT THESE OTHER TOWNS DO, BUT WE'RE NOT WE'RE NOT THE ONLY PERSON THAT'S IN THIS.
YEAH. SO WE CERTAINLY CAN TAKE THE ACTION OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF WEEKS AS WE'RE WORKING ON THE DETAILS OF THE PROJECTS TO DIVE DEEPER INTO THE RATE STRUCTURE AND THE RATE STRUCTURE OF THE OTHER COMMUNITIES AND MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A GOOD UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THAT IS.
AND IF THERE'S A WAY TO STRATEGIZE AROUND MINIMIZING THE IMPACT.
WE CAN WE CAN ONLY CONTROL OUR WAGE STRUCTURE.
HOW ARE THEY? IS IT BY VOLUME? IS IT I MEAN, I GUESS THE COST ACCOUNTANT COMES OUT IN ME AND WANTS TO LIKE, DIVE IN AND START LOOKING AT IS IT LABOR OR IS IT MATERIAL? WHAT'S DRIVING OUR COST STRUCTURE? AND I GUESS DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHER MEMBER CITIES THAT ARE IN THE SAME BOAT AS US.
BUT WE'RE ON A MIXED SYSTEM AND SIMILAR TO US IN THAT SIZE.
I THINK THAT'S AN EXCELLENT SET OF QUESTIONS FOR US TO TRY TO ADDRESS.
BUT WE COULD ALSO ALWAYS KEEP OUR RATE LOW BUT NEVER FIX ANYTHING.
I MEAN, WHICH HAS HAPPENED IN THE PAST.
YEAH, THAT'S WHERE WE ARE TODAY.
I MEAN. AND THE GOOD NEWS, SAYING WE'RE FIXING THINGS, RIGHT.
THE BAD NEWS IS IT'S GOING TO COST US MORE TO DO THAT.
BUT WE HAVE TO RECOGNIZE THAT WE'RE ADDRESSING THE PROBLEMS AND THAT IT'S COSTLY AND ADDRESS THEM IN 20, $24 INSTEAD OF 26 OR EIGHT OR 2030, RIGHT.
COSTS ARE ONLY GOING TO INCREASE AND THEY'RE GOING TO INCREASE AT A HIGHER RATE THAN YOU CAN BOND.
THAT'S THE PROBLEM WITH THE SITUATION, IS YOU CAN'T GET ANY BENEFIT BY PUSHING IT.
DOWNSTREAM. BECAUSE WHETHER IT'S THROUGH STATE MONEY OR EVEN WITH YOUR YOUR CREDIT RATING, THE LIKELIHOOD OF THERE BEING A ESCALATORY ENVIRONMENT IN THE CONSTRUCTION MARKET, GIVEN ALL THE DEVELOPMENT IN THE STATE, IS PRETTY LOW.
AND THAT'S GOING TO MEAN ESCALATION IS 6 TO 8% A YEAR OR 8 TO 10% PER YEAR.
AND YOU'LL ALWAYS BE ABLE TO BOND AT CHEAPER THAN THAT.
NOW. YOU CAN'T GO BITE OFF EVERYTHING AT ONCE BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO PAY FOR IT, TOO.
BUT YES, SIR, THAT'S PART OF, I THINK, WHAT WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO DO FOR YOU AND LOOKING AT THE WAY WE LEVEL INTO THESE APPLICATIONS AND OTHER THINGS AND HOW THAT WOULD AFFECT THE RATES IS HOW MUCH CAN YOU EFFECTIVELY BITE OFF IN YEAR ONE, FOLLOWED BY YEAR TWO OF ALL BY THREE YEAR, YEAR THREE.
BUT WE DIDN'T DO THEM ALL IN ONE FUND.
SO WE, WE LEVELED UP ON OUR WASTEWATER.
GOT THINGS GOING. THEN WE DID SOME ON OUR WATER AND WE CAME BACK ON THE WASTEWATER.
WE'RE LOOKING MOSTLY AT THIS KIND OF ANALYSIS.
WHAT'S THE ACTUAL MONTHLY BILL GOING TO LOOK LIKE? AND I THINK STRUCTURED THAT WAY.
YEAH. BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT THE CITIZEN SEES.
WELL, THIS CAN BE HARD BECAUSE WE'RE GOING TO GO OUT FOR THIS.
RIGHT. AND WE'RE GOING TO GO BORROW THE MONEY AND RAISE THE RATES.
AND THEN BWA GIVE US THE RESERVOIR INCREASE AND THEY'LL GIVE US AN M&O INCREASE AND WHATEVER.
AND LET'S SAY YOU JUST RAISE THE RATES BECAUSE YOU SAID YOU'RE GOING TO BORROW THIS.
NOW YOU TURN AROUND AND RAISE THEM AGAIN.
[00:45:02]
LIKE YOU SAID, IT'S THE THINGS WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT ARE GOING TO BE DIFFICULT IN THIS PROCESS.I DON'T NEED TO GET INTO THIS TONIGHT, BUT I THINK THERE'S A WAY TO PACKAGE THAT IN YOUR BILL THAT MAY MAKE IT CLEAR WHAT THE CITY IS DOING VERSUS WHAT'S HAVING TO BE PASSED THROUGH. I WAS LOOKING FOR MARKETING SUGGESTIONS.
YEAH. WE'VE HAD TO DEAL WITH THAT ISSUE, TOO.
THIS IS WHAT YOUR CITY CONTROLS.
THIS IS WHAT YOUR CITY DOES NOT CONTROL.
I WOULD STRONGLY ENCOURAGE US TO.
AND WE'RE DOING THIS TO LOOK AT THE SANITARY SEWER REHAB PORTION OF THE COLLECTION SYSTEM.
THAT'S WHERE OUR INFLOWS COME FROM, WHICH ALL HAS TO GO OUT TO THE SEWER PLANT.
SO I KNOW THE $5 MILLION IN THE LIST, THERE IS JUST A GUESS.
ALL THESE ARE GUESSES. BUT THAT'S A THAT'S THE BIGGEST GUESS OF ALL, BECAUSE YOU HAVE NO IDEA HOW SEVERE OR WHERE THESE PROBLEMS EXIST.
THAT'S WHY WE GO THROUGH AND DO THE SMOKE TESTING AND THINGS LIKE THAT TO TRY TO FIND.
THE MAJOR, THE MAJOR INFLOW POINTS, THE COUNCILMAN BOOTH IS EXACTLY RIGHT.
IF YOU CAN SLOW DOWN THE AMOUNT OF WATER YOU DON'T NEED TO TREAT GETTING TO THE PLANT, IT CAN SAVE YOU ON HOW MUCH YOU HAVE TO EXPAND THE FACILITY OR FIX THE FACILITY. JUST FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES, THAT $5 MILLION IS PROBABLY.
OBVIOUSLY, IT DEPENDS UPON WHERE YOU'RE BUILDING FOR BUILDING UNDER CONCRETE.
IT'S A DIFFERENT ANIMAL, BUT MAYBE 20,000 LINEAR FEET A YEAR OF 270,000 LINEAR FEET THAT YOU HAVE.
SO 5 MILLION IS AN INVESTMENT, BUT IT TAKES A LONG TIME TO GET TO FULL REPLACEMENT WITH THAT KIND OF INVESTMENT. SO.
ANOTHER THING YOU MAY WANT TO LOG INTO AS YOU GET GOING.
SO WHAT KIND OF ACTION DO YOU WANT US TO GIVE? JUST. SUBMIT A PDF AND WITH OUR SELECTIONS AND A DOLLAR AMOUNT.
YEP. JUST GIVE ME A DOLLAR AMOUNT IN THAT WAY, YOU KNOW, YOU'VE GIVEN THAT PARAMETER OF WHAT YOU WANT TO FIX, AND THEN WE'VE GIVEN THEM THE AUTHORIZATION BECAUSE LIKE CHUCK SAID AND MARK SAID, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TIME TO COME BACK.
AND HEY, THEY RANKED US NUMBER 25 AND CLEAN WATER AND 15 AND DRINKING WATER.
AND THESE ARE THE GRANTS OR THE TERMS OR WHATEVER.
AND THEN IF WE WANT TO PARE THAT.
YOU KNOW. OR DO YOU MEAN DOWN? WE CAN SAY WE REALLY ONLY HAVE THE APPETITE FOR X AND THAT MECHANISMS. NINE MONTHS TO I THINK A YEAR FROM NOW FOR THAT SO THIS IS NOT A ONE AND DONE AND WE'RE OBLIGATED THIS IS STEP A, STEP ONE TO SEE WHERE WE'RE AT.
OR MAYBE WE HAVE OPERATIONAL ISSUES AND WE SAY IT'S AN EASY DECISION.
YOU KNOW, CAN'T FORECAST THAT.
SO THE AMORTIZATION SCHEDULE FOR THE NEXT TEN, 15 YEARS.
JUST TO HELP US UNDERSTAND THE COST STRUCTURE A LITTLE BIT.
YEAH. TIMELINE JUST HAD A CRYSTAL BALL.
WHEN WOULD WE ACTUALLY BE LOOKING AT A FIRST PAYMENT SHOULD WE GET SELECTED AND ALL THAT? IS THAT 20, 26, 2027, 2028? SO WE CAN START. Y'ALL CAN START DOING YOUR BUDGETING.
YEAH. SO THAT'S ONE REASON I STEPPED UP HERE.
I WANTED YOU TO, ONCE YOU SUBMIT A PIF, I WANTED YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THE PROCESS WAS.
[00:50:07]
HERE ARE THE SPECIAL CONDITIONS LIKE DISADVANTAGED GREEN EMERGENCY PROJECTS, WHATEVER THEY HAVE, SMALL AND RURAL, THOSE KIND OF THINGS.THAT HAS KIND OF GONE BY THE WAYSIDE WITH THEIR LOW STAFFING LEVELS.
SO I GAVE YOU LAST YEAR, I THINK IT HIT IN NOVEMBER, IT WAS THAT LATE.
BUT ONCE YOU SEE THAT AND IN IT'S IN DRAFT FORM AND IT'S OPEN FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FOR A MONTH, RIGHT, YOU ACTUALLY GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO SEE WHERE YOU SCORED. AND ONE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS, MISSOURI CITY, YOU KNOW, I EVEN SAW AN ANOMALY ON THEIR SCORING.
AND SO I SUBMITTED A COMMENT TO THE BOARD HOPING TO GET THE RANKING CHANGED.
DIDN'T HAPPEN. I DIDN'T GET IT, BUT WE TRIED.
IT GIVES YOU THAT OPPORTUNITY.
BUT YOU SEE WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO BE.
SO YOU'RE NOT WAITING FOR A YEAR TO FIGURE OUT WHETHER YOU GOT THE FUNDING OR NOT, BECAUSE IF YOU ARE IN SO THE BOARD WILL GIVE SEVERAL LISTS, ALPHABETICAL AND THEN BY RANK ORDER, AND THEN THEY GIVE A LIST THAT'S CALLED THE INITIAL INVITED PROJECTS LIST.
AND GIVEN THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THEY HAVE AND THE DIFFERENT FEATURES THEY HAVE TO TRY TO FUND LIKE THE GREEN AND THE DISADVANTAGE AND ALL THIS, THEY THEN SHOW YOU, HERE'S THE ENTITIES WE PLAN TO INVITE FIRST, AND THEN AFTER THAT FIRST ROUND AND THE APPLICATIONS ARE SUBMITTED BY THAT GROUP, THEN THEY CAN START MOVING DOWN THE LIST UNTIL THEY RUN OUT OF MONEY ULTIMATELY.
AND THAT'S HOW THE PROCESS WORKS.
I KNOW THE BOARD WOULD LIKE TO CURE THAT.
SO LET ME TELL YOU WHAT THEIR NORMAL TIME FRAME WOULD BE.
JULY WOULD BE THE 30 DAY PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, THE 1ST OF AUGUST.
THEY'RE ADDRESSING THOSE COMMENTS AND SENDING IT BACK TO EVERYBODY.
USUALLY THE DAY OF GIVEN ENOUGH TIME OR WITHIN A DAY OR TWO, THEY'RE INVITING THOSE THOSE FIRST PROJECTS ON THAT INITIAL INVITED PROJECTS LIST, AND THEY'RE USUALLY GIVING ABOUT 60 DAYS TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION.
SO NOW YOU'RE TALKING IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT END OF AUGUST, NOW YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER, AROUND THE END OF OCTOBER 1ST OF NOVEMBER, YOU'RE HAVING TO SUBMIT A FULL APPLICATION NOW THAT EVEN THOUGH THERE'S STILL NO COMMITMENT TO SUBMIT THAT IT IS A SIGNIFICANT SUBMITTAL.
IT'LL TAKE YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR, IT'LL TAKE YOUR BOND COUNCIL, THE ENGINEER.
WE HAVE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL AND ALL KINDS OF STUFF.
SO IT'S A HEAVIER LIFT THAN JUST SUBMITTING THIS PIF.
SO IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NOVEMBER NOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DECEMBER, JANUARY, FEBRUARY, MARCH AT THE EARLIEST, YOU'RE GOING TO THE WATER BOARD FOR A FUNDING COMMITMENT AND THEN IT TAKES AT QUICKEST 3 TO 4 MONTHS TO CLOSE THAT LOAN OR CLOSE THAT LOAN.
AND IN THE SRF PROGRAMS, THEY DON'T CALL THEM A GRANT.
THEY CALL THEM PRINCIPAL FORGIVENESS.
SO AT THE QUICKEST YOU'RE LOOKING MARCH OR APRIL IN A NORMAL TIME FRAME.
SO THAT'S KIND OF THE LAY OF THE SCHEDULE.
NOW, BEYOND THAT, LET'S SAY YOU CLOSE, LET'S SAY IN APRIL YOU HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENT THAT HAS TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED AND ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY REPORT, WHICH IS AN ENGINEERING PLANNING DOCUMENT THAT HAS TO BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED, AND THEN PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ESPECIALLY FOR WASTEWATER WHEN THERE'S BOARD FUNDING INVOLVED, TCU PASSES OFF ALL STATE DESIGN REVIEW TO TWDB, SO IT STAYS WITH THE TWDB.
SOME MORE COMPLICATED PROJECTS STILL HAVE TO GO TO TCQ FOR APPROVAL, BUT ON WASTEWATER.
ITS ALL WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD.
NANCY RICHARDS, I KNOW HER WELL.
NANCY HAS A LOT OF EXPERIENCE, BUT SHE'S LIKE ALL THE REST OF THE TEAMS OVER THERE.
BUT EVERYTHING IS SLOWED DOWN.
AND THAT'S THAT'S THE BAD PART.
YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE INFLATION ON TOP OF SLOWER SCHEDULES AND, YOU KNOW, LIKE MR. BOOTH SAID. WHEN DO WE THINK WE'D GET THE FUNDS JUST BASED ON A NORMAL TIMELINE AND THEN ?
[00:55:01]
MARCH OR APRIL.AND THEN WE'D MAKE A PAYMENT WHEN? YOU'D START MAKING CYCLE OF YOUR BONDING, RIGHT? SO IT IS A BOND.
SO YOU'D MAKE TWO INTEREST PAYMENTS A YEAR AND ONE PRINCIPAL PAYMENT.
SO WITHIN 12 MONTHS YOU'D START MAKING PAYMENTS ON THAT.
NOW WITH THAT SAID, THE BOARD DOES ALLOW THEY AT LEAST ENTERTAIN STRUCTURING.
WE JUST NEED A LITTLE BIT OF TIME, YOU KNOW, MAYBE TWO YEARS TO PUSH THAT OUT.
NOW, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO LET YOU BACK IN, LOAD ALL THE PRINCIPAL.
IT'S GOOD TO KNOW. AND SO 2025.
YEAH, YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING.
BUT NORMALLY IT'D BE 12 MONTHS FROM THE CLOSING DATE.
BUT IN ORDER TO DO THAT, YOU'D HAVE TO RAISE RATES EARLIER TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT.
MAKE YOUR RATE ADJUSTMENTS SIX MONTHS EARLIER TO MAKE THAT PAYMENT.
WE CAN COME BACK AND REFINE IT.
I THINK YOU'D PROBABLY WANT TO BE DOING YOUR RATE STRUCTURE AHEAD OF WHEN YOU'RE DOING YOUR APPLICATION, AND THEN YOU'D BE ABLE TO START COLLECTING SOME OF THE FUNDS YOU NEED TO BE BE AHEAD OF YOUR PAYMENTS.
SO YOU'D HAVE SOMETHING TO BASE THAT ON.
YEAH. A LOT OF TIKTOK VIDEOS, CHRIS, FOR MARKETING.
[INAUDIBLE] THAT I'M IN THE FACEBOOK OR SOMETHING.
DEBORAH, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS? THANK YOU. SO THE PRESENTATION IS ALL THE PROJECTS IN TANDEM.
HOW ARE WE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD? HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR IT? WHAT'S MOST IMPORTANT AND HOW DO WE PICK AND CHOOSE THOSE? AND THE FIRST PROJECT OF THE WASTEWATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS THE SCHNEIDER PROJECT.
SO THAT'S SORT OF SEPARATE, RIGHT? SO THAT'S A SEPARATE CONTRACT THAT WE'RE GOING TO GO OUT, DEVELOP THAT WORK AND GET THAT IMPLEMENTED.
YOU'RE RUNNING AT ABOUT 178,000 A YEAR ON YOUR ELECTRICAL USE THERE AT THE PLANT, AND WE THINK WE CAN SAVE YOU NEARLY $100,000 A YEAR ON THAT. SO TO COMPLEMENT CHRIS'S COMMENT ABOUT YOUR UTILITY COST FOR YOUR KW IN THEM, THE CONTRACT THAT YOU'RE IN RIGHT NOW, IT'S ACTUALLY A COST AVOIDANCE GETTING THAT WORK DONE NOW AS WELL BECAUSE YOU WON'T BE USING AS MUCH OF THAT POWER.
SO I WANT YOU TO CONSIDER THAT.
SECOND THING IS THE DEVELOPMENT OF THAT PROJECT IS PROBABLY 6 TO 9 MONTHS, WHICH IS AGAIN IN TANDEM WITH WHAT THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT AS FAR AS HOW LONG IT'S GOING TO TAKE TO GET INFORMATION BACK AND HOW'S IT LOOKING AND WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GO.
SO I WOULD IMAGINE THAT THE SEWER RATES IS GOING TO NEED SOME STRONG CONSIDERATION AND WHERE YOU WANT TO GO WITH THAT AND THEN ALSO PAYING THAT LOAN AS WELL. SO WE'LL ALSO BE WATCHING INTEREST RATES FOR YOU.
AND YOU ARE IN A GOOD POSITION BECAUSE OF YOUR RATING.
WE DON'T FINANCE THE PROJECTS, BUT WE'LL HELP YOU IDENTIFY GOOD FUNDING FOR THAT.
BUT I WOULDN'T RECOMMEND PUTTING IT OFF.
AND CECIL, YOU'VE MADE A VERY GOOD ARGUMENT THIS EVENING ABOUT WE'VE PUT THIS OFF FOR SO LONG.
SO WE PLAN TO SEND OUR CONTRACT, OUR INVESTMENT GRADE AUDIT, WHICH IS GOING TO BE TO DEVELOP THE WORK AND HOPEFULLY HAVE THAT BACK TO YOU BY NOVEMBER, OCTOBER, NOVEMBER.
IF IT'S LESS THAN NINE MONTHS, GREAT.
I'M GOING TO SAY IT'S GOING TO BE THAT NINE MONTHS.
AND A LOT OF THAT, TOO, IS JUST WHAT'S HAPPENING IN OUR ECONOMY.
SO JUST AS A REMINDER, THESE ARE TWO SEPARATE THINGS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE.
BUT WE'RE WANTING TO GO AFTER A COMPREHENSIVE FUNDING OBJECTIVE HERE TO TAKE CARE OF THAT.
SO IF SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC FINDS OTHER FUNDING, THEN WE'LL BRING THAT BACK TO YOU.
[01:00:06]
AND SO IT GIVES US OPTIONS DOWN THE ROAD.AND THERE ARE SOME GRANTS AND REBATES AND THINGS AVAILABLE.
BUT FOR THIS IN PARTICULAR, FIRST WE'VE GOT TO GET THAT DEVELOPED AND THE $20 MILLION THAT WE'VE IDENTIFIED ALSO CAN BE PICKED APART IF YOUR APPETITE ISN'T FOR THAT.
AND WE'LL TALK ABOUT IT, BUT YOU NEED TO PICK THOSE PROJECTS AND SAY, OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO PUT THESE OTHERS AT RISK AND TAKE THESE NOW OR WE'RE GOING TO GO ABOUT THIS COMPREHENSIVELY. SO.
THANK YOU. LOOKING FOR A MOTION.
I HAVE TO SAY THE BIGGER QUESTION IS HOW MUCH YOU WANT TO BITE OFF.
MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE $40 MILLION THAT COVERS COST OF GOODS AND MATERIALS TWO TO THREE YEARS FROM NOW BASED ON CURRENT INFLATION RATES. AND AGAIN, WE CAN SLIM THAT DOWN IF THE ECONOMIES INTEREST RATES HAVE DROPPED AND PRICE OF GOODS SERVICES DROP, WE CAN CERTAINLY NUG THAT DOWN.
I WAS GOING TO START AT 36.33.
WELL, BECAUSE REALLY YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUY $36 MILLION WORTH OF STUFF.
AND THAT'S TRUE. TWO AND A HALF TO FIVE YEARS, YOU'RE GOING TO BUY 30 MILLION OR 32 MILLION.
AND JUST REMINDER, ALL WE'RE TRYING TO DO RIGHT NOW IS SET A CEILING.
A MOTION. WELL, NO, SET A CEILING THAT WE SEND IT TO TWDB, BECAUSE IF WE'RE BELOW IT, THAT'S FINE.
MR. MAYOR. I MOVE, WE AUTHORIZE FREESE AND NICHOLS AND THE CITY MANAGER TO GO OUT FOR A PIF SUBMITTAL IN THE AMOUNT OF $40 MILLION FOR THE LISTING THAT WAS PRESENTED TO US TONIGHT WITH A LITTLE BIT OF OVERAGE JUST IN CASE WE HAVE SOME OTHER PROJECTS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT.
DO I HAVE A SECOND? I WILL SECOND THAT.
I HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? THANK YOU FOLKS, VERY MUCH FOR COMING OUT AND PRESENTING TO US.
THANK YOU, DUSTIN, FOR YOUR TEAM.
YES, SIR. THANK YOU, MR. MAYOR.
REMIND I DON'T NEED TO REMIND THE COUNCIL.
I'D LIKE TO REMIND THE PUBLIC THAT WE HAVE SPENT A LOT OF TIME.
OUR CITY STAFF HAS JUST POURED THEIR HEARTS INTO PUTTING THIS TOGETHER.
SO THANK YOU TO EVERYBODY THAT YOU'VE YOU'VE HELPED US SO FAR.
AND, JOHN, THANK YOU ONLINE AS WELL.
AND YOUR OTHER COUNTERPART, THAT'S ONLINE AS WELL.
OKAY. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I'LL CALL FOR THE VOTE. HEARING NONE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN.
OKAY. THAT COMPLETES OUR WORKSHOP PORTION OF OUR MEETING.
WE'LL GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
THE COUNCIL WILL CONVENE TO EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHAPTER 551 GOVERNMENT CODE NUMBER TWO, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON REAL PROPERTY.SECTION 551.072 OF THE TEXAS STATE GOVERNMENT CODE SAW SHOW US GOING TO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 7:39.
ALL RIGHT. WE ARE, WIN OR LOSE, BACK AT THE TABLE, IT SHOWS WE'RE RECONVENING AT 8:26.
COUNCIL, DO WE HAVE ANYTHING COMING OUT OF EXECUTIVE SESSION? MR. MAYOR, I MOVE WE AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT.
SECOND BY COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES AND THAT COMPLETES OUR AGENDA ITEMS. WE ARE NOW IN ADJOURNMENT AT 8:27.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.