[3. Discussion and possible action on determining possible meeting dates to meet with City Council for a workshop regarding the Zoning Code and various District Regulations.]

CODE AND VARIOUS DISTRICT REGULATIONS.

YES, GRACE, IF YOU WOULD JUST ROLL DOWN TO THE DATES RIGHT THERE AND WE'LL STOP THERE.

BUT BASICALLY COUNCIL INITIALLY REQUESTED THAT STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION WOULD COME BACK AND HAVE A WORK SESSION IN WHICH THEY CAN LOOK AT HOW THE CITY HAS DEVELOPED FROM A PLANNING AND ZONING PERSPECTIVE, LOOK AT SOME OF THE HISTORICAL REASONS WHY CERTAIN THINGS ARE ZONED A CERTAIN WAY, AND THEN THIS WOULD ALLOW THEM ALSO TO LOOK AT OUR VISION IN TERMS OF HOW WE'RE DEVELOPING.

ARE WE DEVELOPING TOO FAST? DO WE NEED TO SLOW DOWN? DO WE NEED TO DO CERTAIN THINGS TO ENHANCE OR IMPROVE THE WAY WE DO DEVELOPMENT? SO WE'RE ACTUALLY REQUESTING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD PARTICIPATE IN THAT WORK SESSION.

IN FACT, SOME OF YOU, COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND, HAS REQUESTED THAT WE HOST A WORK SESSION AND WORKSHOP BEFORE THE COUNCIL TO KIND OF TALK ABOUT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU'RE SEEING, SUCH AS OUR TEXT AMENDMENTS THAT ARE ON THE TABLE FOR CONSIDERATION.

SO WE WANTED TO LOOK AT MAY AS AN OPTION TO HAVE THE JOINT WORK SESSION WITH COUNCIL AND WE'RE LOOKING AT DOING IT POSSIBLY ONE HOUR OR SO BEFORE THEIR MEETING. SO THIS IS JUST A TIME BRACKET, SOME OF THE POSSIBLE DATES IN MAY THAT YOU CAN LOOK AT YOUR CALENDAR AND THEN SUGGEST MAYBE A COUPLE OF OPTIONS AND THEN WE'LL GET BACK WITH YOU ONCE IT'S PLANNED AND ADVERTISED.

ANY QUESTIONS? ARE YOU LOOKING FOR FEEDBACK TODAY? FEEDBACK? I SORT OF HAVE THE ABILITY FOR AVAILABILITY.

I HIGHLIGHTED THE REASONING FOR THE WORKSHOP.

IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER SUGGESTIONS FOR ADMIN, ADMIN WE'LL BE GLAD TO CONSIDER THOSE AS WELL.

BUT THIS IS JUST TO FRAME IT AND GET SOME FEEDBACK FROM YOU AND CONSENSUS.

I'M AVAILABLE THE FIRST TWO DATES, I'M OUT OF THE COUNTRY ON THE 30TH.

I'M AVAILABLE ON THE SECOND TWO DAYS.

SO WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE.

I CAN'T MAKE THE 30TH.

STILL IN THE MIDDLE.

SURGERY AT SOME POINT IN TIME IN EARLY MAY AND I DON'T KNOW WHEN.

OKAY. SO BUT TYPICALLY THAT TIME IS GOOD AND I JUST APPLAUD HAVING THESE MEETINGS AND I WILL RECOGNIZE THAT MAY 30TH IS NOT A COUNCIL DATE, IT WAS ONE OF THOSE FREE TUESDAYS IN THE MONTH, SO IT MAY NOT BE ONE OF THEIR PREFERRED EITHER, BUT WE WANTED TO AT LEAST PUT SOME OPTIONS OUT THERE.

SOUNDS LIKE MAY 16TH IS GOING TO WORK BEST FOR PLANNING ZONING.

SO. SO RIGHT NOW WE'LL LOOK AT THE 16TH TO COME, CORRECT? YEP. AS A POSSIBILITY.

AND THEN IF THEY'RE NOT AVAILABLE THAT THEY WILL SHIFT AROUND AND COME BACK TO YOU.

ALL RIGHT. SOUNDS GOOD. SOUNDS GOOD.

THANK YOU. CASE.

YOU DON'T KNOW WHO I AM. CHRIS WHITAKER, ANGLETON CITY MANAGER.

SO THIS KIND OF STEMMED OUT OF A REQUEST FOR A STORAGE FACILITY IN A RESIDENTIAL

[00:10:03]

AREA. AND SO THE QUESTION IS, WAS EVERYTHING ZONED PROPERLY AND DO WE NEED TO LOOK AT OTHER PLACES THAT MAY BE, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, AS WE GROW AND CHANGE AND WHATEVER. SO THAT'S WHAT KIND OF SPURRED THIS.

AND WE HAVEN'T LOOKED AT THAT IN A WHILE.

SO IT'S A GOOD THING TO DO.

SOUNDS GOOD. THANK YOU, CHRIS.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM FOUR, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 28-63 OF

[4. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on an application for a Special Use Permit (SUP), pursuant to Sec. 28-63 of the Code of Ordinances, for a Daycare within the Commercial General Zoning District(C-G), DBA Carwood Preparatory Academy Daycare/Preschool at 1100 E. Mulberry St., Angleton, TX, Stes. D&E.]

THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR A DAYCARE WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT DOING BUSINESS AS CARWOOD PREPARATORY ACADEMY DAYCARE SLASH PRESCHOOL AT 1100 EAST MULBERRY STREET, ANGLETON, TEXAS SUITES D AND E.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIR. THIS IS AN ITEM BEFORE YOU.

A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED, AS YOU STATED, AT 1100 EAST MULBERRY SUITES D AND E FOR A DAYCARE.

THE PROPERTY IS ZONED CG, GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AS PART OF THE ZONING RESOLUTIONS.

THERE ARE SOME DISTRICTS IN WHICH SOME USES ARE NOT ALLOWED AS OF RIGHT, BUT AS A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT, THEY'RE ALLOWED WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS AND ALSO WITH CERTAIN CRITERIA BEING MET TO MAKE SURE AND WE APOLOGIZE FOR THE NOISE, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY MEET THOSE SPECIAL CRITERION TO BE CONSIDERED, SUCH AS IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING AREAS AND ALSO TO MAKE SURE THAT THE USE IS COMPATIBLE WITH WHAT IS SURROUNDING . TYPICALLY IN THESE SHOPPING STRIPS, THERE ARE CERTAIN USES SUCH AS ASSEMBLY, DAYCARES.

COUNCIL. I THINK ONE WANTS TO TAKE A PAUSE TYPICALLY BECAUSE IF YOU ALLOW CERTAIN USES WITHIN THOSE RETAIL DISTRICTS, YOU HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND THAT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE SERVICE TYPE USES WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED BECAUSE OF PROXIMITY ISSUES AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

SO A LOT OF CITIES, THEY PUT THIS CATEGORY IN THE SUP FOR THAT REASON.

DAYCARES ARE REGULATED BY THE STATE IN WHICH WE POINT OUT IN THE STAFF REPORT AND THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO HOLD, OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN THAT PARTICULAR LICENSE.

WE'VE GIVEN YOU THE ZONING MAP.

YOU CAN KEEP ROLLING THAT OF THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE SHOPPING STRIP AND ALSO THE AERIAL VIEW THERE SHOWING THE GENERAL LOCATION NEAR THE SUBWAY OFF OF WEST MULBERRY AND ALSO THE FRONTAGE HERE.

AND OTHER THAN THAT, STAFF WILL JUST POINT OUT THAT WE HAVE A DRAFT ORDINANCE IN THE PACKET WHICH WOULD CERTIFY THAT LOOKING AT THE CRITERION, FOR THE MOST PART, THIS PARTICULAR USE DOES MEET THOSE IMPACT WARNINGS, I WOULD SAY, TO ENSURE THAT THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, GOING INTO A FACILITY WHERE THAT WON'T BE PROBLEMATIC FOR THEM OR FOR OTHERS.

SO WE POINTED OUT A FEW CONDITIONS THAT THEY MAY WANT TO CONSIDER, IF YOU WOULD CONSIDER THOSE ALSO.

AND ONE WOULD BE TO LOOK AT THE DROP OFF OF THE CHILDREN IN TERMS OF SAFETY AND POSSIBLY WORK WITH THE OWNERSHIP AND MAKE A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO HAVE SOME SPEED BUMPS INSTALLED, MAYBE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE SUITES IN TERMS OF SAFETY.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, THE OTHER CONDITIONS DEAL WITH MAINTAINING THE LICENSING AND ALSO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT AND THEN THE HEALTH PERMIT WOULD BE TRIGGERED IF THEY WERE TO CHANGE FROM USING CATERED FOOD SERVICES.

OTHER THAN THAT, WE HAVE ADVERTISED THE SUP.

EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT WERE NOTIFIED AND IT WAS ADVERTISED IN THE NEWSPAPER FOR FOLKS TO COME IN AND GIVE COMMENT.

OTHER THAN THAT, IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

THE APPLICANT IS HERE AND THEY CAN GIVE YOU MORE INFORMATION IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN AND THE HOURS OF OPERATION, BECAUSE SOMETIMES THOSE ARE OTHER THINGS THAT WE NEED TO CONSIDER. SO I'LL HALT NOW, UNLESS YOU HAVE OTHER QUESTIONS OF ME, WE'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THOSE.

ALL RIGHT. BEFORE I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, LET ME JUST MAKE THE AUDIENCE WHERE THERE ARE SOME FORMS HERE THAT THE STAFF ASK THAT YOU FILL OUT IF YOU WISH TO SPEAK AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. THEY'RE LOCATED ON THE TABLE JUST OUTSIDE THE DOOR.

AND WITH THAT IN MIND, I'VE GOT A REQUEST FOR MISTER CHRISTOPHER WOODARD TO SPEAK.

MISTER WOODARD WELL, I'M HERE JUST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF ANY OF YOU GUYS WOULD HAVE FOR ME ABOUT THE DAYCARE CENTER.

OKAY. WELL, YOU'RE OBVIOUSLY IN FAVOR OF IT.

SO WE WILL CONCLUDE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND THEN IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS, WE WILL CALL UPON YOU.

OKAY. MISTER WOODARD, IF YOU DON'T MIND GIVING THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN AND HOURS OF OPERATION, JUST FOR THE RECORD.

RIGHT NOW, WE ARE WORKING WITH THE STATE, WITH THE TYPE OF CENTER IT WAS PREVIOUSLY.

IT WILL BE ANYWHERE FROM THE 48 TO 50 STUDENTS AND HOURS OF OPERATION WOULD MOST LIKELY BE FROM 7 TO 7.

[00:15:08]

SO WE CAN GET THE AFTER SCHOOLERS.

OKAY. WHAT AGE? WE ARE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW, THEY'RE WORKING WITH LICENSING AND REGULATIONS.

THEY'RE LOOKING AT PROBABLY 18 MONTHS STARTING OUT THROUGH 13 YEARS OLD.

THANK YOU, MR. WOODARD.

OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON ABOUT THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE INTO THE DISCUSSION PHASE OF OUR PROCESS.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF ANYBODY? WELL, JUST ME ON THE.

ON THE PLAYGROUND AREA.

ON THE FENCED IN AREA.

OF COURSE, IT LOOKS KIND OF BLIGHTED.

YOU KNOW, IT LOOKS LIKE WEEDY BACK THERE AND VERY SMALL FOR THAT MANY CHILDREN.

WHERE DO THEY PLAN ON PLAYING.

I MEAN, ARE YOU ALL GOING TO CLEAN THAT UP? ARE YOU GOING TO EXPAND IT OR WELL, IT LOOKS LIKE A DOG RUN TO ME.

WELL, I'M WORKING WITH THE OWNER.

THAT WILL BE COMPLETELY CLEARED OUT.

AND JUST BECAUSE IT WAS, I GUESS, ABANDONED FOR SO LONG, THAT'S WHY IT OVERGROWN.

EVERYTHING IS OVERGROWN.

HOWEVER, BASED ON THE STATE REGULATIONS NOW, I AS LONG AS IT CAN SUIT UP TO 25% OF THE KIDS AT ONE TIME.

SO FOR ME, THEY HAVEN'T WORKED OUT TO WHERE MY SCHEDULING WOULD HAVE CLASSES ROTATE TO USE THE PLAYGROUND AND SO YOU'D HAVE LIKE ANYWHERE FROM 8 TO 10 IN A 600 SQUARE FOOT AREA.

AND THE STATE, I'M SURE, REGULATES THE GROUND COVERING AND EQUIPMENT AND EVERYTHING.

EVERYTHING YOU CAN THINK OF, THEY COVERED.

AND I DIDN'T POINT OUT IT IS IN THE REPORT, THIS WAS A PREVIOUS DAYCARE, BUT IT GOT VACATED, AS NOTED.

YES. SO THE FENCED PLAYGROUND AREA IS THE FENCED AREA THAT'S PRESENTLY THERE, OR Y'ALL WOULD BE EXPANDING IT OR BUILDING A NEW ONE? SO IT'S THE ACCORDING TO WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW, THAT'S THE AREA THAT WE WOULD USE CURRENTLY.

BUT WE'RE WORKING WITH THE OWNER TO TRY TO EXPAND IT A LITTLE BIT BIGGER BECAUSE WE WOULD LIKE TO, OF COURSE, ADD A NICE PLAY SYSTEM.

DOES THE STATE REGULATE WHAT AGES OF CHILDREN CAN BE GROUPED TOGETHER IN A PARTICULAR CLASSROOM? YES. AND THERE ARE SUFFICIENT CLASSROOMS FOR YOU TO TAKE 18 MONTHS TO 13 YEARS.

YES. FOR YOUR SCHOOL AGED KIDS, ARE YOU BUSSING THEM TO SCHOOL? FOR SCHOOL AGED KIDS, WE WILL NOT BE DOING THE BEFORE SCHOOL PROGRAM.

WE WILL DO AFTER SCHOOL.

SO WHAT WE ARE DOING IS WE WILL HAVE LIKE A VAN.

AND RIGHT NOW I'VE ALREADY KIND OF LIKE TALKED TO NORTHSIDE AS WELL AS I ALWAYS SCREW THE SCHOOL NAME UP RANCHO AND WORKING ON LIKE A SCHEDULE FOR NEXT YEAR TO GET THOSE KIDS BUSSED OVER TOO.

CENTRAL IS REAL CLOSE TO YOU, TOO, ELEMENTARY IS PROBABLY THE CLOSEST.

YEAH MISS HOWELL AT NORTHSIDE, SHE'S LIKE TALK TO CENTRAL, TOO.

OKAY. MISS MCCORMICK, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION BECAUSE I'M FAMILIAR WITH THE PREVIOUS APPROVALS AND SO FORTH, AND I'M ASSUMING SINCE IT WASN'T MENTIONED THAT THERE WERE NO ISSUES WITH WHAT WAS APPROVED PREVIOUSLY.

SO BASICALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING IS PRETTY MUCH THE SAME THING.

YEAH. THE REASON WHY WE TRY NOT TO ALLOW THESE USES GO FROM A NEW BUSINESS OWNER TO THE OTHER BECAUSE SOMETIMES THEY MIGHT HAVE DIFFERENT PARAMETERS.

THE LICENSING IS AFFECTED WITH THE AGE QUESTION THAT WAS MENTIONED BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO HAVE CERTAIN NUMBER OF STAFF MEMBERS OF A CERTAIN TYPE AND IT PLAYS INTO THE SPACE ITSELF AND HOW IT'S LAID OUT.

SO THIS APPLICATION WOULD BE SPECIFIC TO THIS PARTICULAR.

BUT I GUESS MY MAIN QUESTION WAS, WERE THERE ANY ISSUES PREVIOUSLY? BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH SIMILARITY.

IS THERE ANYTHING WE NEEDED TO BE CONCERNED WITH, WHICH I'M ASSUMING NOT SINCE YOU DIDN'T BRING IT UP.

KYLE WILL REPORT, OF COURSE, ON ANY CODE ISSUES.

HE'S WORKING WITH HIS CURRENT APPLICANT TO GAIN OCCUPANCY, BUT OTHER THAN THAT, WE HAVE TO REPORT TO THE STATE THAT THEY'VE DONE THIS STEP AND THAT THEY MEET ALL THE CITY REQUIREMENTS. BUT KYLE, ARE THERE ANY ISSUES THAT THE PREVIOUS USER? THERE WASN'T. IT WAS A LOCAL EXCUSE ME, LOCAL OWNER THAT HAD THAT SPOT THAT STILL OPERATES IN TOWN.

THEY JUST SCALED BACK AND DIDN'T WANT TO USE THIS LOCATION ANYMORE SO.

[00:20:02]

SO THE DAYCARE THAT WAS THERE IS STILL IN OPERATION IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION IN TOWN? THEIR ORIGINAL LOCATION..

IT'S CALLED KINGDOM CLASS. MRS. BOGGS, I BELIEVE. AND THEY I THINK THEY QUIT BECAUSE THEY BOUGHT ACTUALLY THE PIZZA HUT.

IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING, AND THEY'RE BEHIND THERE ON MAGNOLIA.

AND SO THEY OWN BOTH OF THOSE BUILDINGS.

THE PLAN WAS TO EXPAND, I THINK, THE PIZZA HUT TO MAKE THEIR DAYCARE LARGER.

AND I ONLY KNEW THAT BECAUSE OF THE THE SALE OF THE PROPERTY.

IS IT IS THE RAILROAD AN ISSUE AT ALL? NO, MA'AM. OKAY.

AND IS THE DAYCARE THAT'S COMING IN PRESENTLY IN OPERATION SOMEWHERE ELSE LOOKING TO EXPAND OR YOU'RE CREATING A NEW ENTITY? I THINK HE IS. ARE YOU NEW IN ANGLETON? YES, WE'RE NEW IN ANGLETON.

WE'D BE CREATING A WHOLE NEW FACILITY THAT'S TECHNOLOGY BASED.

DO YOU HAVE OTHER FACILITIES IN OTHER LOCATIONS? NO. WE HAVE PREVIOUSLY OWNED CHEER, DANCE, GYMNASTICS PLACES AND WE ARE FOSTER PARENTS FROM 2015 TILL NOW.

AND WE ARE ADOPTIVE PARENTS.

SO WE'VE BEEN AROUND LICENSING AND REGULATIONS AND EVERYBODY WOULD ALWAYS TELL US, HEY, YOU KNOW, YOU ALL BE A GREAT FIT FOR BEING OWNERS.

AND WE'VE WORKED IN DAYCARES.

WE BOTH HAVE DIRECTOR LICENSES, SO WE'RE LIKE, OKAY, IT'S TIME FOR US TO GO OUT ON OUR OWN.

OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? DOES ANYONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? THE RECOMMENDATION IS ON PAGE 26 OF THE PACKET.

BONNIE. NO YOU GO AHEAD.

THE I RECOMMEND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FOR THE SPECIFIC PERMIT USE PERMIT, SUP APPLICATION FOR A DAYCARE WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL ZONING DISTRICT CG FOR THE GARWOOD PREPARATORY ACADEMY DAYCARE PRESCHOOL AT 1100 EAST MULBERRY STREET, DNE TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL, CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION.

AND THERE ARE FINDINGS OF FACT OF NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS.

THAT APPLICANT SHOULD MAKE GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO OBTAIN PERMISSION OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS SHIP TO INSTALL SPEED BUMPS IN THE DROP OFF AREA TO ENSURE CHILD SAFETY FOR SPEEDING CARS AND ACCESSING THE PARKING LOT.

THE APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN AND MAINTAIN CHILD CARE LICENSING AS REGULATED BY THE STATE OF TEXAS HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE COMMISSION.

THE APPLICATION APPLICANT SHALL OBTAIN ANY CITY FINAL OCCUPANCY PERMITS PRIOR TO OPENING THE FACILITY.

THE APPLICANT SHALL MAINTAIN ANY REQUIRED HEALTH PERMIT FOR FOOD SERVICES TO THE CHILDREN.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND IT.

OKAY. I'VE GOT A MOTION FROM MS..

BARRY AND A SECOND FROM MS. MCDANIEL. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED. SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

GOOD LUCK. YOU'RE WELCOME TO STAY THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THIS VERY LONG AGENDA, OR YOU'RE WELCOME TO LEAVE.

IT'S UP TO YOU. ITEM FIVE, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON A REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A TEXT AMENDMENT MODIFYING VARIOUS SUBSECTIONS OF THE CITY OF

[5. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on a request for approval of a Text Amendment, modifying various subsections of the City of Angleton Code of Ordinances, Chapter 23, Land Development Code. In addition to other minor changes to the chapter pertaining to cross references, duplications, clarifications, terminologies, reorganizations, and similar, the following sections are proposed to be amended: Sec. 23- 5; Sec-23.10; Sec. 23-12; Sec. 23-14; Sec. 23.37; Sec. 23-38; Sec. 23-60; Sec. 23.75; Sec. 23-81; Sec. 23-87; Sec. 23.95; Sec. 23-94 through Sec. 23-98.]

ANGLETON CODE OF ORDINANCES.

CHAPTER 23 LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

IN ADDITION TO OTHER MINOR CHANGES TO THE CHAPTER PERTAINING TO CROSS REFERENCE, DUPLICATION, CLARIFICATION, TERMINOLOGIES, REORGANIZATIONS, AND SIMILAR TO THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS ARE PROPOSED TO BE AMENDED.

SECTION 23-5, SECTION 23.10, 23-12, 23-14, 23.37 23- 38, 23-60, 23.75, 23-81, 23-87, 23.95 23-94 THROUGH SECTION 23-98.

AND UNLESS I'M MISTAKEN, THIS IS A CONTINUATION OF A PUBLIC HEARING THAT WE OPENED LAST MONTH AND HAVE JUST SIMPLY CONTINUED.

YES, SIR.

AND OF COURSE I'LL REPORT QUICKLY.

THE IDEA HERE IS TO, NUMBER ONE, UPDATE THE COMMISSION AS TO HOW THE TAX AMENDMENTS ARE GOING.

I WILL REPORT JUST FOR THE RECORD, THESE ARE SHORT TERM CHANGES TO THE LDC, OUR ZONING CODE, CHAPTER 23 FOR THE MOST PART.

ALL OF THESE CHANGES HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AS WELL AS THE CITY COUNCIL.

IN THE PAST YOU'VE BEEN, OF COURSE, COPIED ON THE PROCESS THROUGH GUNDA, WHO IS THE CONSULTANT THAT HAS DONE THESE.

WHAT WE'VE BEEN DOING IS WE'VE TAKEN A STEP BACK TO LOOK AT THE TEXT AMENDMENTS.

AS YOU SEE ON THE NEXT PAGES.

WE WON'T GO THROUGH ALL OF THE RED MARKS, BUT WE WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT THE LEGAL REVIEW IN TERMS OF SOME OF THE RECOMMENDED CHANGES IN WHICH GUNDA HAS GONE IN AND CORRECTED SOME OF THE RED LINES.

SO WE WANTED TO RUN THROUGH THE PRESENTATION QUICKLY, WHEREAS THERE ARE A LOT OF REFERENCES IN THE CODE, AS YOU KNOW, CAME ABOUT BECAUSE OF SUGARLAND.

SUGARLAND'S CODE WAS USED AS A TEMPLATE IN LAYING OUT THE LDC.

AND WHAT THIS DOES IS IT ALLOWS US TO MAKE OUR REGULATIONS, NUMBER ONE, COMPLY WITH STATE REGULATIONS WITH PLATING.

[00:25:08]

DUE TO THE SHOT CLOCK REQUIREMENTS OF WHAT THE LEGISLATURE WENT IN AND DID IN TERMS OF HOW PLATS ARE REVIEWED WITHIN 30 DAYS AND PROCESSED. AND ALSO IT ALSO DEALS WITH OUR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES IN HOW WE DO DEVELOPMENT IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER ONE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, HOW WE DO THOSE, THE PERFORMANCE BONDS AND HOW WE POST THOSE, AND THEN WHAT PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS ARE WITHIN THE CODE.

SO IT BASICALLY DID NOT CREATE A LOT OF TEXT CHANGES THAT DEALT WITH OUR REGULATIONS FROM A USE PERSPECTIVE.

THOSE WILL COME ABOUT IN OUR LONG TERM CHANGES.

BUT THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE IMMEDIATE THINGS THAT STAFF AND ADMINISTRATION FELT, HEY, WE NEED TO GET THESE THINGS CORRECTED, NUMBER ONE, SO THAT WE BECOME LEGAL AND SO THAT WE TAKE OUT SOME OF THESE CROSS REFERENCES OF THINGS THAT DON'T EXIST, SUCH AS A CONSTRUCTION MANUAL IN WHICH YOU'LL SEE HERE IT IT RELATES TO A LOT OF THINGS THAT IN ESSENCE, WE'RE DEALING WITH WERE DEALT WITH AT THE SUGARLAND CITY GOVERNMENT.

SO A LOT OF THESE WHEN YOU LOOK THROUGH THEM, THEY'RE REALLY JUST ADMIN CHANGES TO CORRECT SOME OF THE TEXT THAT WAS IN CONFLICT.

SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'LL JUST RUN THROUGH THE CHANGES WHERE CERTAIN REFERENCES WERE DELETED.

AS I STATED, WE DO HAVE A THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

WE DO NOT HAVE A CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, SO A LOT OF THE CROSS REFERENCES WERE REMOVED.

AND AS YOU KNOW, WITH LEGAL, THEY WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THINGS ARE ENFORCEABLE.

SO YOU'LL SEE AREAS WHERE IT'S EITHER PERMITTED OR PERMITTED OR NOT OR MANDATORY OR ENFORCEABLE.

SO THOSE REFERENCES ARE BEING LOOKED AT.

AND THEN THE PROCESSES FOR APPROVALS, VARIANCES IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ARE DEALT WITH.

OTHER THAN THAT, LIKE I STATED, I WON'T GO THROUGH A LOT OF THE RED MARKS.

YOU'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE WHAT WAS POSTED ON THE AGENDA.

OTHER THAN THAT, I'LL BRING BACK THE FINAL REVIEW OF LEGAL AND WE'RE HOPING TO GET THESE THINGS THROUGH THE PROCESS.

AS A PART OF THE WORK SESSION WE'RE HOPING TO DEAL WITH A LOT OF THE CHALLENGES YOU'RE HAVING ON THE LAND USE AND ZONING DISTRICT PERSPECTIVE, THE USE CHALLENGES AND ANY OTHER ITEMS THAT YOU SEE.

PLEASE SEND ME YOUR IDEAS ON HOW YOU WANT TO PROGRESS THROUGH THE WORK SESSIONS.

BUT THESE WERE ANTICIPATING GETTING THESE TO COUNCIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.

WE DON'T WANT TO BEAT THE DEAD HORSE IN THOSE TERMS PER SE, BUT WE WANTED TO ALSO KEEP THE PUBLIC AWARE OF THE PROCESS.

AND IF THEY HAVE ANY COMMENTS, THEY'RE WILLING THEY COULD SEND THOSE TO US AND WE'LL GET THOSE OVER TO YOU.

IN YOUR NEXT MEETING, I'M ANTICIPATING MOVING THIS FORWARD SO YOU WON'T HAVE TO READ THOSE SECTION NUMBERS ALL OVER AGAIN.

THANK YOU. SO DO WE WANT TO ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS AT THIS TIME? I WOULD AND THEN WE'LL CONTINUE IT ON TO YOUR NEXT MEETING.

AND MY PROMISE IS I NEED TO WORK WITH LEGAL.

THAT'S MY CHALLENGE TO GET THESE FORWARD.

IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OR ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE? GOING ONCE. GOING TWICE.

OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

MOVING TO THE NEXT ITEM.

OKAY. SO WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING OR WE CONTINUE.

WE'RE GOING TO CONTINUE IT.

SO NO ACTION IS REQUIRED.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEM SIX DISCUSSION OF A PROJECT CONCEPT FOR THE MULBERRY FIELD SUBDIVISION SITE FOR CONSIDERATION OF A NEW CONCEPT FOR APPROXIMATELY 13 ACRES OF LAND

[6. Discussion of a Project Concept for the Mulberry Fields Subdivision site for consideration of a new concept, for approximately 13 acres of land located north of W. Mulberry St., East side of N. Walker St, and south of W. Live Oak St., within the SF-6.3 Zoning District. No action is required. ]

LOCATED NORTH OF WEST MULBERRY STREET, EAST SIDE OF NORTH WALKER STREET AND SOUTH OF WEST LIVE OAK STREET WITHIN THE SF 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT.

NO ACTION IS REQUIRED.

MR. SPRIGGS.

THANK YOU. FROM TIME AND TIME, WE DO GET APPLICANTS THAT HAVE NEW PROPOSALS THAT THEY WOULD LIKE TO BRING TO THE CITY THAT MAY OR MAY NOT MEET THE ZONING ORDINANCE, AND IT MAY REQUIRE A ZONE CHANGE IN SOME CASES.

SO THIS IS, OF COURSE MULBERRY FIELD SUBDIVISION IS BASICALLY READY FOR CONSTRUCTION.

WE HAVE IN THE PACKET AND YOU CAN JUST KEEP ROLLING UNTIL YOU GET TO THE PRESENTATION.

THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE JUST IN THERE FOR REFERENCE, JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, HEY, THE PROJECT HAS BEEN VETTED.

IT'S BEEN COORDINATED WITH THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, THE STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT IN TERMS OF ACCESS, OUR ENGINEER AND WHAT HAVE YOU IS WORKING WITH THEM TO COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

THE FINAL PLAT IS WITHIN THE PACKET AS WELL, WHICH WILL BE CONSIDERED LATER.

BUT MULBERRY FIELDS HERE WITH DEVELOPMENT OF TEXAS WOULD LIKE TO PRESENT A NEW PROPOSAL FOR THE SITE DUE TO SOME CHALLENGES WITH THE MARKET AND THEY CAN GIVE YOU THE REASONING WHY.

BUT IF YOU WOULD JUST, YOU KNOW, GET US THERE AND ZOOM IT OUT AND THEN WE'LL LET THEM PRESENT TO YOU THEIR CONCEPT.

THIS IS NO ACTION.

THIS IS JUST TO GET FEEDBACK ON HOW YOU WOULD RECOMMEND THAT THEY WOULD PROCEED.

AND WITH THE PRODUCT WE GAVE, WHAT DISTRICTS WE FELT IT WOULD FALL IN, SUCH AS THE SFA, WHICH IS ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

AND THEN THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO DO A PLAN DISTRICT.

[00:30:02]

THAT'S SOMETIMES AN OPTION WHERE YOU CAN USE THE STANDARDS OF A GIVEN DISTRICT, BUT ALLOW THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO LOOK AT IT AND MAKE IT A BETTER FIT WITH CONDITIONS.

SO WE'LL ALLOW.

COREY, IF YOU WANT TO COME UP AND PRESENT TO THE COMMISSION.

THANK YOU SO MUCH.

GOOD AFTERNOON. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

CAN YOU HEAR ME BETTER NOW? YES. IT'S COREY.

COREY BOYER.

THANK YOU. I'M THE MANAGER, PRINCIPAL OF DEVELOPMENT OF TEXAS AND ALSO THE OWNER OF THE MULBERRY FIELDS SUBDIVISION.

AS OTIS HAD MENTIONED, THIS IS LAND THAT WE'VE OWNED FOR ALMOST TWO YEARS NOW, GONE THROUGH ALL THE PROCESSES TO HAVE THIS ALREADY APPROVED AS A AS A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR AND WHAT WE'RE SEEKING TODAY IS FEEDBACK AS WELL AS RECOMMENDATIONS FROM PLANNING AND ZONING REGARDING THE THE REQUESTED CHANGE FROM WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE, WHICH IS SINGLE FAMILY TO SIMPLY A SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED IF WE WANT TO SCROLL THROUGH HERE.

SO WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, AS YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN HOLD ON JUST A SECOND, YOU'RE GOING A LITTLE QUICK.

AS YOU'VE ALREADY SEEN, THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN PLOTTED.

THIS HAS ALREADY BEEN ENGINEERED.

WE'VE ALREADY DONE ALL OF OUR DRAINAGE STUDIES.

WE'VE ALREADY DONE OUR TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS.

WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT IS SIMPLY SWITCHING FROM SINGLE FAMILY 6.3 TO SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED.

WHAT THAT MEANS IS A CONCEPT MUCH MORE LIKE TOWNHOUSES.

WHY WE'RE HERE TODAY IS, AS EVERYONE'S AWARE, INTEREST RATES ARE SUBSTANTIALLY HIGHER THAN WHAT THEY WERE.

CONSTRUCTION COSTS HAVE INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY.

ON TOP OF THAT, INSURANCE FOR THOSE OF US HERE IN THE COASTAL COUNTIES HAS INCREASED SUBSTANTIALLY AS WELL, MAKING HOME AFFORDABILITY A CHALLENGE, AS YOU'VE SEEN FOR ALL THE NEW HOMES BEING BUILT, THEY THEY HAVE INCREASED IN COST SUBSTANTIALLY.

AND WHAT WE'RE FINDING IS TO BETTER PROVIDE REALLY HIGH QUALITY HOUSING.

WE'RE TRYING TO FIND A NEW WAY TO MAKE IT WORK WITHIN THE CITY OF ANGLETON.

SO IF WE WANT TO GO AHEAD.

WHAT WE'RE WHAT WE'RE WORKING THROUGH IS OUR CURRENT SITE, NOT CHANGING ROADS, NOT CHANGING OUR DRAINAGE, NOT CHANGING A LOT OF THINGS OTHER THAN SIMPLY REPLOTTING IT SO THAT WE CAN ACCOMMODATE SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED.

WE'VE TALKED WITH THE CITY MANAGERS AND THE CITY WITH OTIS HERE AT CITY PLANNING TO SEE THAT WE COULD BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH WHAT SFA IS.

SO WE WANT TO SCROLL DOWN.

YOU CAN SEE THE CITY OF ANGLETON ALREADY HAS GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED.

WE WITH OUR CURRENT SITE PLAN THAT WE'RE PUTTING OUT THERE AS OUR CONCEPT TODAY, WE MEET AND EXCEED ALL OF THESE REQUIREMENTS.

IF YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH.

INCLUDING ADDITIONAL PARKING, INCLUDING TWO PARKING SPACES PER.

INCLUDING OVERSIZE LOTS.

PER THE REQUIREMENT.

SO WHENEVER WE LOOK AT WHAT WHAT REALLY DRIVES THIS, IF YOU WANT TO GO TO OUR NEXT.

UM, FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT ARE UNAWARE OF EXACTLY WHERE WE'RE LOCATED, IT'S RIGHT THERE.

IF YOU KNOW WHERE THE CELL PHONE TOWERS ARE.

YOU KNOW, WHERE THE TREE CUTTING GUY IS? YOU KNOW WHERE TEXAS-NEW MEXICO POWER HAS THEIR SUBSTATION THERE OFF WALKER, AND YOU KNOW WHERE TESLA JUST CAME IN WITH THE BATTERY FARM THERE OFF MURRAY RANCH ROAD.

WE ARE KIND OF WEDGED RIGHT IN BETWEEN ALL OF THOSE.

SO THIS IS ALSO CREATED WITH TESLA COMING IN AND THESE OTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES SURROUNDING IT HAS CREATED ANOTHER CHALLENGE, IF YOU WILL.

AND ONE WAY THAT WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE THIS NEW CONCEPT SOMETHING THAT'S MORE APPEALING FOR THOSE IN THE ANGLETON AREA IF YOU WANT TO. GO AHEAD. WHENEVER I WAS REFERENCING EARLIER, MAKING SURE THAT HOUSING IS AFFORDABLE.

WHAT WE LOOK AT AND WE'VE PULLED THIS INFORMATION DIRECTLY FROM THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON, WE LOOK AT WHAT THE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IS AND THEN BASED ON WHAT WELLS FARGO CALCULATES, THE MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD CAN AFFORD JUST A LITTLE OVER 220,000 BY CHANGING OUR CONCEPT TO THIS SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED COMMONLY CALLED TOWNHOUSES.

[00:35:08]

IT MAKES EVERYTHING MUCH MORE AFFORDABLE AS FAR AS A HIGH QUALITY RESIDENCE.

ASK YOU A QUESTION. YES, SIR.

WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS AND A DUPLEX? IT JUST DEPENDS ON HOW PEOPLE CALL IT.

IT'S. IT'S SIMILAR.

IT'S VERY SIMILAR.

DUPLEX. IT'S VERY SIMILAR TO A DUPLEX.

HOW IS IT DIFFERENT? WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO CONJOIN THESE.

IT'S. IT'S SOMETHING THE WAY THAT THIS.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN, EXACTLY? MEANING WE COULD TECHNICALLY, WE COULD BUILD IT.

AND THIS IS WHERE I'M SEEKING RECOMMENDATIONS.

WE CAN. WE CAN CONNECT THESE SO THAT WE COULD HAVE UP TO EIGHT ALL SIDE BY SIDE, ALL WITH SHARED WALL.

RIGHT NOW, THE WAY THAT WE HAVE OUR PLANS, THEY ARE THERE ARE TWO UNITS THAT ARE ATTACHED.

SO THEY'RE DUPLEXES.

YOU CAN CALL IT A DUPLEX.

YES, SIR. I'M JUST CURIOUS AS TO WHY YOU'RE NOT CALLING IT A DUPLEX? BECAUSE TYPICALLY WHENEVER PEOPLE THINK ABOUT DUPLEXES, THEY THINK ABOUT THEM AS RENTAL UNITS.

AND AND REALLY, THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE SEEKING.

THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION.

YES, I AND THANK YOU FOR THE QUESTIONS.

AND PLEASE STOP ME AT ANY POINT IF YOU ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS LIKE THIS, BECAUSE REALLY.

DOES THIS HAVE AN HOA THAT PREVENTS YOU FROM PURCHASING UNITS AND RENTING THEM? SO WE HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO THE HOA POINT RIGHT NOW THIS IS WHY WE'RE HERE IS SO THAT WE CAN HAVE THIS DISCUSSION WITH CITY OF ANGLETON PLANNING AND ZONING IN THE NEXT WEEK WITH CITY COUNCIL.

BECAUSE WHAT I WANT YOU TO SEE IS, YOU KNOW, HERE'S WHAT THE TYPE OF PRODUCT THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT OUT THERE.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE PUTTING HIGH QUALITY.

AND WHENEVER A LOT OF PEOPLE THINK ABOUT DUPLEXES, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE THINKING ABOUT THE OLD SCHOOL SINGLE STORY, TWO BEDROOM, NO GARAGE, NO, NO, NO REAL YARD OF ANY NATURE.

I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S NOT AT ALL WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO PUT OUT.

WE'RE JUST LOOKING AT AS AN ALTERNATIVE FOR HOUSING.

BUT YOU'RE GOING TO SELL THESE, RIGHT? YES, MA'AM. SO I'M GOING TO HAVE A NEIGHBOR.

DO I HAVE A FIREWALL BETWEEN ME AND MY NEIGHBOR? YES, MA'AM. ALL THE WAY UP THROUGH THE ATTIC.

YES. SO IN THE SAME AMOUNT OF SPACE THAT YOU WERE GOING TO HAVE 41 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TWICE AS MANY BECAUSE THEY'LL BE ATTACHED.

CORRECT. SO HOW DOES THAT NOT CREATE ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC CONCERNS? SO WE'VE ALREADY REACHED OUT TO THE ENGINEER AND BECAUSE WE'VE GOT TWO POINTS OF EGRESS, WE WERE ALREADY A VERY SMALL SUBDIVISION TO HAVE TWO POINTS OF EGRESS. THE MINIMUM IS 30.

WE ARE, BUT BECAUSE WE HAVE ACCESS THERE TO WALKER AS WELL AS TO MULBERRY, IT CREATES MULTIPLE POINTS IN WHICH IF YOU LOOKED AT THE SITE, YOU KNOW, POINTS IN WHICH EVERYONE CAN CAN ENTER AND EXIT, WHICH AGAIN, LIKE I SAID, THE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CAME BACK AND SAID IT'S A NEGLIGIBLE DIFFERENCE.

UM, SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS IF YOU WANT TO KEEP SCROLLING DOWN SOME OF THE OTHER CONCERNS OR SOME OF THE OTHER ITEMS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP FOR OTHER USAGE OF THIS SPACE. YOU KNOW, AGAIN, ANGLETON IS NEEDING MORE HOUSING, MORE QUALITY, AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

MULTIFAMILY IS ALWAYS AN OPTION BECAUSE OF ITS PROXIMITY TO COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL IS ALWAYS AN OPTION.

BUT I FELT LIKE BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE ARE RESIDENCES, THERE ARE HOMES JUST TO THE WEST, THIS WOULD BE A GOOD FIT BECAUSE OF IT STILL PROVIDES HIGH QUALITY HOUSING.

WELL IT IS MORE RESIDENTS THAN THAN WHAT WE INITIALLY HAD APPROVED.

IT IS NOT AS DENSE.

IT IS NOT AS INTENSE AS ANYTHING LIKE LIKE AN APARTMENT COMPLEX OR ANYTHING AS INTENSE AS AN INDUSTRIAL PARK.

SO IS IT, ARE THE, ARE EACH SIDE OF THE UNIT APPROXIMATELY THE SAME SIZE THAT THE SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE STANDING ALONE WOULD HAVE BEEN? SO WHAT WE'VE GOT HERE IS 1444 SQUARE FEET, THREE BEDROOM, TWO AND A HALF BATH.

AND WHAT WOULD THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES.

SO THEY WOULD TYPICALLY RANGE ANYWHERE FROM 1800 TO 2200FT², THREE BEDROOM AS WELL, THREE AND FOUR.

SO THERE WOULD BE MORE PEOPLE.

YES. AND WHENEVER YOU THINK ABOUT WITH MORE PEOPLE, THERE'S MORE CARS.

WITH THIS, AGAIN, IT'S A LITTLE BIT SMALLER.

IT'S REALLY NOT GEARED FOR LARGE FAMILIES OR EXTENDED FAMILIES TO BE ALL UNDER THE SAME ROOF.

IT'S IT'S REALLY A WAY FOR PEOPLE TO GET IN AND HAVING A VERY AFFORDABLE, HIGH QUALITY PRODUCT.

[00:40:03]

COREY, WITH THAT AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT, DO YOU THINK THE PARKING LOT IS NECESSARY WITH THE GARAGE AND THAT AMOUNT OF PAVEMENT FOR PARKING TO ACCOMMODATE VISITORS, SO POSSIBLY UTILIZE THAT CENTER AREA AS PARK? SO IF YOU SCROLL BACK UP TO THE TOP.

GENTLEMEN, LET'S KEEP IN MIND WE HAVE A LONG AGENDA.

YEP. THAT RIGHT THERE.

STOP, STOP, STOP.

SCROLL DOWN JUST A LITTLE BIT.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE RIGHT THERE.

SO PER THE CITY OF ANGLETON, CURRENT RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS FAR AS SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, WE HAVE TO HAVE ONE ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY FOUR RESIDENCES.

SO WE'RE DEDICATING THAT THAT CENTER SPACE, WHICH WAS GOING TO BE HOME SITES TO ADDITIONAL PARKING AS WELL AS GREEN SPACE TO MAKE IT MORE ENCOURAGING FOR RESIDENTS TO BE THERE AND JUST, QUITE FRANKLY, GIVE THEM MORE SPACE.

SO. SO OKAY, WITH THAT IN MIND, I'M CURIOUS TO HEAR FROM OUR REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS IN THE ROOM ABOUT THEIR THOUGHTS ABOUT THE NEED FOR THIS CONCEPT AND THIS IN OUR COMMUNITY. WELL, IN MY OPINION, WE DO NEED MORE DUPLEXES.

WE REALLY DO OR TOWNHOMES.

WE ONLY HAVE JUST A FEW OF THEM.

BUT I'M LOOKING FOR MORE OF OUR SENIORS, NOT A TWO STORY DEVELOPMENT.

I DON'T SEE OUR SENIORS WHO WOULD BE MORE INCLINED TO PURCHASE THOSE PROPERTIES WOULD WANT STAIRS.

SO THAT'S NOT A NEED.

AND YOU SAY NEW CONSTRUCTION.

WE HAD 2200 PUSHING DIRT NOW.

AND THE CHALLENGE AS A REALTOR FOR MOST OF THOSE IS THE PIDS.

IT'S REAL HARD TO SELL A PID TO A FIRST TIME BUYER.

AND SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOURS IS GOING TO COME WITH THAT OR NOT.

IT IS NOT.

THIS IS ALL BECAUSE THE LOCATION WE'RE NOT IN A POSITION WHERE WE NEED OR BECAUSE OF THE RELATIVELY SMALL SIZE, WE WE DON'T HAVE ANY PID IN PLACE OR ANY PLAN FOR A PID.

OKAY. BONNIE, YOU HAVE ANY FEEDBACK? UM, YEAH.

I GUESS WHAT I'M SEEING IS MOST OF THE CLIENTS I WORK WITH WANT SOMETHING BRAND NEW.

EVEN THOUGH THE PRICE POINT IS ALMOST $100,000 MORE THAN THEY COULD GET A USED HOME.

THEY DON'T WANT TO DO ANY REMODELING.

THEY DON'T WANT TO DEAL WITH IT.

SO I THINK THERE IS A MARKET FOR SOMETHING A LITTLE DIFFERENT.

OKAY. YEAH, WE DIFFER.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. BOYER BEFORE WE MOVE ON? OKAY. FEEDBACK.

AS THE SITTING DISSENTER OF SMALL LOTS.

MY WHOLE THING, MY ANTENNAS WENT UP WHEN I WENT FROM THE CURRENT APPROVED PLAN OF 41 SINGLE FAMILY HOME SITES AND WE'RE DOUBLING DOWN TO 82.

I'M SORRY.

WE'VE GOT THAT RIGHT OUT THERE.

I MEAN, YOU'RE GOING TO PUT IT UP NEXT TO THESE SUBDIVISIONS OVER HERE THAT THEY'VE BEEN FIGHTING ABOUT THIS FOR EVER.

AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO GO IN AND WE'RE GOING TO EVEN PUT MORE CONDENSE, HIGH DENSITY UP AGAINST THEIR NEIGHBORHOODS AND THEY'RE GOING TO HOWL.

I CAN I CAN TELL YOU THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HOWL.

THEY DIDN'T LIKE THE SMALLER LOTS THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO BRING IN BEFORE.

I JUST I WOULD BE TOTALLY AGAINST IT BECAUSE I THINK THE NEIGHBORS, THAT MANY NEIGHBORS SITTING ON TOP OF EACH OTHER.

BRINGS ITS OWN SET OF HEADACHES.

OWNERS OR NOT.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU MS. SPOOR. MR. BOYER, YOU HAVE RECEIVED OUR FEEDBACK.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

YOU'RE WELCOME. ITEM SEVEN, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN SECTION THREE SUBDIVISION, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS

[7. Consideration of approval of a Final Plat for Windrose Green Section 3 Subdivision. The subject property consists of 23.70 acres, 122 Lots, 3 Blocks, 4 Reserves, in the T.S. Lee Survey, Abstract #318, is in the City of Angleton ETJ and is located on the south side of FM 523 approximately 2,500 feet west of the FM 523/SH 35 intersection. ]

OF 23.7 ACRES, 122 LOTS, THREE BLOCKS, FOUR RESERVES AND A TS LEE SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 318 IS IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON ETJ AND IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FM 523, APPROXIMATELY 2500FT WEST OF THE FM 523 STATE HIGHWAY 35 INTERSECTION.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS OF COURSE THE FINAL PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN, WHICH YOU DO KNOW THAT IT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR THIS PARTICULAR SECTION THREE.

THEY HAVE SUBMITTED THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE UNDER REVIEW AND FINAL APPROVAL PROCESSES THROUGH OUR ENGINEERING AND STAFF.

WE HAVE THIS PARTICULAR PLAT REVIEWED AND IN THE INTERIM OF POSTING THE AGENDA, THERE WERE SEVEN COMMENTS THAT WERE OFFERED AND REVIEWED BY THE APPLICANT AND I WILL REPORT THAT THEY HAVE SUBMITTED THE REVISED PLANS IN TERMS OF SATISFYING THOSE SEVEN COMMENTS.

SO WE HAVE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK THROUGH THOSE PARTICULAR COMMENTS AND WORK WITH THE ENGINEER IN TERMS OF OUR

[00:45:06]

CONSULTANT REVIEWING THIS PARTICULAR PLAN.

SO THE RECOMMENDATION HERE IS TO FORWARD IT TO COUNSEL WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION AND THAT THEY WOULD SATISFY ANY CONDITIONS REMAINING OF THE CITY ENGINEER ON THE FINAL REVIEW OF THE CONSTRUCTION DOCKS.

THIS IS IN THE ETJ AND IT IS MOVING FORWARD AS A DEVELOPMENT.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS OR ANYONE ELSE? DOES ANYONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT AND RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION.

ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION FROM MS..

MCDANIEL SECOND.

I HAVE A SECOND FROM MISS TOWNSEND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION.

I HAVE A FEELING THAT WE OUGHT TO DO THIS ONE BY RAISE OF HANDS.

SHOW OF HANDS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO INDICATE SO BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR.

ALL THOSE NOT IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION.

RAISE YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ONE, TWO, THREE. SO FOUR TO THREE ON THAT ONE.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ITEM EIGHT, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ASHLAND UTILITY RESERVE FOR 0.23 ACRES OF LAND CONTAINING TWO RESERVES AND ONE BLOCK FOR UTILITY PURPOSES.

[8. Discussion and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Ashland Utility Reserve, for 0.23 acres of land, containing two reserves in one block for utility purposes, out of the Shubael Marsh Survey A-81 &A-82, Brazoria County, Texas as submitted by Ashton Gray Development.]

OUT OF THE CHAPPELLE MARSH SURVEY, A-81 AND A-82, BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS, AS SUBMITTED BY ASHTON GRAY DEVELOPMENT. MR. SPRIGGS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

THIS IS A CONSIDERATION OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE ASHLAND UTILITY RESERVE FOR .3 ACRES, AS NOTED. GIVE ME A SECOND HERE.

I'M HAVING A LITTLE TECHNICAL ISSUE.

WE FORWARDED THE REVIEW TO OUR ENGINEER TEAM TO LOOK AT WHAT WAS BEING SUBMITTED.

THEY NOTED, OF COURSE, THE CONDITIONS, AS NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT, IN WHICH THE APPLICANT DID CLEAR ALL OF THE COMMENTS REGARDING SOME OF THE NOTATION TYPOGRAPHICAL ISSUES ON THE PLATS.

IN TERMS OF THE TWO RESERVES, THIS IS ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSIDERATION OF CITY COUNCIL IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

WE'RE VERY NEARING THE COMPLETION OF THE AGREEMENT FOR THE SUBDIVISION.

THIS IS PARTICULARLY.

FOR THE PURPOSES OF ALLOWING FOR A LIFT STATION AND UTILITIES WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION ONLY.

THIS HAS NOTHING DIRECT TO DO WITH LOTS OF ANY NATURE.

SO WE'RE ASKING THAT YOU WOULD APPROVE THIS PLAT WHICH DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND FORWARDED WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL SUBJECT TO THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

OKAY, SO THIS IS UTILITIES ONLY.

YES, SIR. ALSO IN OUR ETJ.

ALSO IN THE ETJ, YES.

ALL RIGHT, MOVE.

WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOP UTILITY RESERVE, .23 ACRES OF LAND CONTAINING TWO RESERVES IN ONE BLOCK FOR UTILITY PURPOSES AND A LIFT STATION AND RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

HAVE A MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MISS BIERI.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

AYE. OKAY, SO WE ARE, ONE ONE DISSENTER ON THAT ONE.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

ITEM NINE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE.

[9. Discussion and possible action on the preliminary plat of the Ashland Project Coral Haven Street Dedication]

ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE ASHLAND PROJECT CORAL HAVEN STREET DEDICATION.

MR. SPRIGGS.

THANK YOU. THIS IS, OF COURSE, THE CORAL HAVEN STREET DEDICATION PLAT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT, AS WE STATED, IS IN THE ETJ AND AS PART OF THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY BEING CONSIDERED, WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEING FINALIZED BY ADMINISTRATION AND LEGAL AND OUR ENGINEERING TEAMS. SO THERE WERE LISTED SEVEN ITEMS THAT WERE NOT SUBSTANTIAL IN NATURE, BUT THEY DEALT WITH SOME OF THE NOTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS ON THE PLATS.

THOSE PARTICULAR ITEMS WERE RESUBMITTED TO US AFTER POSTING OF THE AGENDA AND THEY HAVE OF COURSE SATISFIED THE CLEARANCE OF THOSE PARTICULAR COMMENTS. AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU FORWARD THIS TO COUNCIL WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE STREET DEDICATION PURPOSE PLAT FOR THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT.

ALL RIGHT. MM.

[00:50:05]

I'LL MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ASHLAND CORAL HAVEN STREET DEDICATION PLAT AND FORWARD IT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION, SUBJECT TO THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY MS. MCDANIEL AND A SECOND BY MS. TOWNSEND. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? I HAVE A, I HAVE A QUESTION.

IF WE ARE APPROVING THE STREETS, ARE WE LOCKING OURSELVES INTO THE SUBDIVISION? WHAT IF WE DON'T LIKE.

SO TODAY THERE ARE SOME PLATS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED.

THE CONCEPT PLAN, AS YOU KNOW, HAS MOVED FORWARD THROUGH THE PROCESS, THE CITY COUNCIL AND HAS BEEN APPROVED IN TERMS OF CONCEPT.

SECTION ONE AND THEN THERE ARE ALSO SOME OTHER STREET DEDICATIONS THAT HAVE COME BEFORE YOU.

I THINK THERE WERE THIS IS THE THIRD STREET DEDICATION PLAT.

AND THEN I THINK THE MODEL HOME SECTION WAS ALSO APPROVED AND FORWARDED TO COUNCIL AS WELL.

SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, IT IS MANY PIECES MOVE IN.

THERE HAVE BEEN SOME APPROVALS IN THE PAST.

AS MENTIONED IN THE STAFF REPORT.

THIS IS IN THE ETJ.

WE DO NOT HAVE AUTHORITY OF ZONING IN TERMS OF LOT SIZES.

I WILL TELL YOU THAT COUNCIL IS WORKING THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO ENSURE THAT WE HAVE A MIX OF HOUSING, NOT OF JUST ONE TYPE AND THEY ARE LISTENING TO CITY COUNCIL IN TERMS OF THAT MIX.

SO WE'RE LOOKING AT AN OPTION TO HAVE ANYWHERE ALL THE WAY UP TO THE 80 FOOT LOTS TO BE AVAILABLE IN THIS DEVELOPMENT.

SO THAT THRESHOLD IS BEING NEGOTIATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

AND I WILL SAY WE'VE HAD A LOT OF SUCCESS IN ADVANCEMENT ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AS IT RELATES TO TWO HOUSING TYPES TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T JUST GET ALL 50 FOOT LOTS.

THERE ARE MANY MOVING PARTS.

AS I STATED TO YOU, IF THERE ARE SOME THINGS YOU HAVE IN TERMS OF QUESTIONS DURING THE PROCESS, PLEASE CONTACT ME.

I CAN FORWARD YOU, YOU KNOW, THE OVERALL IN TERMS OF WHERE WE ARE AND THEN WHAT'S BEEN APPROVED AND THEN ALSO THEIR PHASING PLAN, BECAUSE A LOT OF THAT DETAIL YOU'RE NOT SEEING IN TERMS OF THE PHASING OF THE PROJECT, DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DO. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT, I LIKE TO SAY, I KNOW THAT YOU'RE DOING IT IN MULTIPLE PHASES AND IT'S KIND OF TOUGH TO GRAB A PIECE OVER HERE AND GRAB A PIECE HERE AND GET THE FULL CONCEPT OF IT.

WHAT I DON'T SEE ON THESE MAPS, AND THAT'S WHY I'M I'M CONFUSED.

I DON'T SEE HOW THIS PROJECT BUTTS UP AGAINST OUR ANGLETON LEVY OUT THERE AND WHERE THIS WATER IS GOING TO FLOW FROM THE NORTH TOWARD THE SOUTH AND TOWARD THAT LEVY, WHERE DOES IT GO AND WHERE DOES THE LEVY CUT IN AND WHERE ARE THE AGREEMENTS OF WHERE THAT.

OUTFLOW WATER IS GOING AND WHERE DOES IT END UP? CORRECT. AND THOSE QUESTIONS ARE BEING FIELDED AT THE COUNCIL LEVEL AND THEY'RE MAKING SURE THAT THE APPLICANT IS SATISFIED.

ANY STORMWATER REGULATIONS IN TERMS OF THE OUTFALL, AS YOU STATED.

SO AS A AS A PART OF THE IMMEDIATE ANSWER, THE DIA, WHICH IS A DRAINAGE IMPACT ANALYSIS, HAS ALL OF THE DETAIL THAT SHOWS WHERE THEY'VE DONE THE RELEASE LEVELS IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW, YOU CANNOT CREATE MORE WATER THAT HAPPENED BEFORE THE DEVELOPMENT AND IT'S FLOWING OUT OF YOUR PROPERTY AND WHERE YOU'RE CAUSING PROBLEMS DOWNSTREAM.

SO YOU HAVE TO HOLD THE WATER ON THE PROPERTY IN TERMS OF DETENTION.

SO THAT DETAIL IS IN THE DIA.

AND AS I STATED EARLIER, IF YOU NEED THE DETAIL OF IT, I'M HAPPY TO SEND YOU A LINK TO THE DOCUMENT, PROVIDE THAT TO YOU JUST AS A POINT OF REFERENCE.

BUT AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT, ALL OF THESE PHASES HAVE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF, NUMBER ONE, THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, BRAZORIA COUNTY, FLOOD CONTROL OR WHATEVER AGENCY WOULD HAVE TO APPROVE IT FROM THE COUNTY LEVEL AS WELL.

AND THEN THE DIA IS ALSO, OF COURSE, COORDINATED WITH, LIKE YOU SAID, THE LEVEE AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

SO I'M NOT AN ENGINEER PER SE, BUT WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT ALL OF THE TOUCH POINTS ARE COMPLETED.

AND THEN YOU HAVE NEIGHBORS THAT ACTUALLY ARE BUTTING IN TERMS OF THOSE [INAUDIBLE] AND THEY'RE ASKING THE SAME QUESTIONS.

AND THEN WE'RE MAKING SURE THAT THEY HAVE THE INFORMATION AS WELL AND THE ASSURANCE THAT THESE THINGS WOULD BE VETTED AND APPROVED BY THE DISTRICTS.

OKAY. WELL, LIKE I SAY, THAT THERE WAS A QUESTION FROM SOME PEOPLE THAT HAVE PROPERTY OUT THERE.

EXACTLY. AND THEY CAN'T THEY'RE NOT READING ANY BETTER THAN I AM WHERE ALL OF THIS OUTFLOW IS GOING AND HOW IT'S GOING TO GET TO DIFFERENT POINTS AND WHERE ARE THOSE POINTS. RIGHT, AND WE'VE MADE THEM AWARE AND I'VE BEEN WORKING WITH SOME OF THE SAME INDIVIDUALS THEY CAN REQUEST THROUGH PUBLIC INFORMATION AND WE DO HAVE ALL THE

[00:55:02]

DOCUMENTS AND IT'LL ACTUALLY SHOW YOU ALL OF THOSE OUTFALLS AND WHERE THE DRAINAGE DETENTION WILL BE.

PONDS WILL BE OUR RETENTION IN MANY CASES AS WELL TO WITHHOLD THE MEETING, I'M SORRY TO WITHHOLD.

AND THEN WE HAD SOMEONE HERE FROM, OKAY, I'M SORRY, CAITLIN, IF THERE ARE SOME GENERAL QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE OF CAITLIN OR IF THERE'S SOME INFORMATION WE NEED TO PROVIDE THE COMMISSION IN THE FUTURE MORE SO SHE WOULD BE THE ONE THAT ASSISTS US WITH THAT AS WELL.

ARE THERE ANY OTHER ITEMS FOR OR IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? WE DO HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

IF NOT, I'LL CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION CONCERNING THE STREET DEDICATION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.

OPPOSED OKAY, SO WE'RE 6 TO 1 ON THAT ONE AS WELL.

OKAY. ITEM TEN.

[10. Discussion and possible action on the preliminary plat of Ashland Section 2]

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLAND, SECTION TWO.

MR SPRIGGS. THANK YOU.

THIS IS, OF COURSE, A RESUBMITTAL OF SECTION TWO DEALING WITH THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT, AS WE STATED IN THE ETJ.

THIS IS, OF COURSE, FOR PROPERTY OF 21.5 ACRES.

86 LOTS, THREE BLOCKS.

AND IT IS SUBJECT TO ALSO WHAT I SAID EARLIER IN TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND ALSO THERE'S A TIA AND THE DIA THAT DEALS WITH, I THINK A LOT OF THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED.

SO SO PARDON ME FOR FOR INTERRUPTING YOU, BUT IF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS CURRENTLY ACTIVELY BEING NEGOTIATED FOR LOT SIZE AND ALL OF THAT, IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME THAT WE WOULD APPROVE A PRELIMINARY PLAT.

IF IT SOUNDS LIKE THE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS IN NEGOTIATION RIGHT NOW.

SO AS I STATED EARLIER, USUALLY THE THING THAT COMES FIRST IS THE CONCEPT PLAN.

AND THAT CAME BEFORE THE COMMISSION AND WENT ON TO COUNCIL AND IT SHOWED THE OVERALL LOT ARRANGEMENTS, A LOT OF CONFIGURATIONS, SOME OF WHICH I THINK KIND OF PREDATED ME.

I'M NOT GIVING ANY EXCUSE, BUT THE CONCEPT PLAN WAS APPROVED.

I THINK, YOU KNOW, PRIOR TO A LOT OF THESE SECTIONS THAT YOU'RE SEEING.

SO THIS IS KIND OF LIKE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THAT CONCEPT PLAN AND MAKING SURE ON THE BACK END THAT COUNCIL HAS APPROVED THE DIA.

THE DIA WILL SPECIFY, NUMBER ONE, HOW YOU'RE HANDLING THIS IN THE ETJ.

THERE ARE A LOT OF CONCESSIONS AND PROMISES BEING MADE.

THOSE ARE TIED DOWN IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF STANDARDS CONTROLS.

SO BY TAKING ACTION HERE, WE'RE NOT GOING TO PUT WE'RE NOT GOING TO CREATE A CONFLICT WITH THE NEGOTIATIONS THAT ARE TAKING PLACE.

NOT AT ALL. THIS IS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, AND THAT CONDITION WILL FOLLOW UNTIL THE DIA IS SIGNED AND THEN THAT CONDITION GETS REMOVED.

ALL RIGHT. PERFECT. THANK YOU.

SO WITH THAT IN MIND, DOES ANYONE DESIRE TO MAKE A MOTION? GOING ONCE.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE AND FORWARD THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE ASHLAND SECTION TWO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION AND APPROPRIATE ACTION, SUBJECT TO THE FINAL APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WANTS TO MAKE A SECOND? GOING ONCE..

AND I DIDN'T SAY IT EARLIER, THERE WERE SOME CONDITIONS THAT WERE NOTED AND THEY HAVE CLEARED THOSE.

THE PLAT DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY AND WE HAVE 30 DAYS TO MOVE IT FORWARD TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.

WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FROM STAFF.

OKAY. GOING TWICE.

LET THE MINUTES REFLECT THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DID NOT ACT DUE TO LACK OF A SECOND.

GRACE. ITEM 11 DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR AUSTIN COLONY SECTION 1A WITHIN PLANNED

[11. Discussion and possible action on a Preliminary Plat for Austin Colony Section 1 A, within Planned Development (PD) District No. 3., on an approximate 164.50 acres of land located on the north side of Anchor Road (CR 44) approximately 2,000 feet northwest of W. Wilkins Street. ]

DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NUMBER THREE ON AN APPROXIMATE 164.5 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ANCHOR ROAD COUNTY ROAD 44, APPROXIMATELY 2000FT NORTHWEST OF WEST WILKINS STREET.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU.

GRACE HAS, OF COURSE, THE COVER FOR THIS PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION.

YOU HEARD THE AUSTIN COLONY PROPOSAL RECENTLY FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE PD NUMBER THREE. THIS IS A PLANNED DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FOR AUSTIN COLONY DEVELOPMENT, WHICH I AM WORKING THROUGH MY TECHNICAL ISSUE HERE.

GIVE ME A SECOND. I WILL HAVE IT UP.

THIS PD DID COVER VARIOUS SECTIONS IN WHICH YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO RECOMMEND ACTION TO COUNCIL BACK IN DECEMBER OR SO.

WE ENTERTAIN THE PD.

[01:00:01]

THIS IS JUST A SECTION OF THE PD.

THAT TABLE IN THE MIDDLE IS WHAT WAS THE LOT ARRANGEMENT AND PERCENTAGES THAT WERE PROMISED FOR THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT.

THE ONLY THING THAT THEY DID IN THE CHANGE FOR THE PD AMENDMENT WAS TO RECONFIGURE AUSTIN COLONY BOULEVARD.

AND BASICALLY AT FIRST IT WAS CONSIDERED A MAJOR ARTERIAL OF SOME SORT AND THEY DOWNGRADED IT TO A LOADED STREET WITH HOUSES ALONG IT. SO THAT WAS BLESSED BY THE COUNCIL AS WELL.

AND THEN THIS PARTICULAR SECTION WAS LOCKED IN TO HAVE A CERTAIN NUMBER OF UNITS.

THIS IS COMPLIANCE WITH THAT.

THE SUBDIVISION WAS REVIEWED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, WHICH CAME BACK AND HAD SOME JUST NON-SUBSTANTIVE RECOMMENDED 11 CONDITIONS THERE IN TERMS OF NOTES AND CERTIFICATIONS ON THE PLAT.

STAFF HAS CLEARED THOSE AND FEELS THAT THE SECTION ONE DOES MEET THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL.

SO WE ASK THAT YOU WOULD FORWARD THIS TO COUNCIL FOR THIS PARTICULAR SECTION 1A FOR AUSTIN COLONY SUBDIVISION.

SO QUESTION.

YES, SIR. ARE WE SAYING THAT THIS IS NO LONGER GOING TO BE A MAJOR ARTERIAL BETWEEN CAN AND WHAT'S THE WEST WEST EXTENSION? CAN YOU ROLL DOWN TO TIGNOR AND COUNTY ROAD 44? SO TIGNOR IS GOING TO PROCEED AS NORMAL.

SHE'S GOING TO. THIS WAS FOR THE STREET THAT GOES OFF ANCHOR ROAD, RIGHT? IT'S OFF OF 44. 44? YES. THAT'S WHAT CHANGED.

THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT CHANGED.

THE OTHER CONNECTIONS ARE STILL THERE TO MAKE SURE WE GOT.

. MY CONCERN IS WITH THE LONG TERM PLAN TO HAVE AN ARTERIAL BETWEEN TIGNOR AND COUNTY ROAD 44 THAT'S STILL IN PLACE.

IT STILL WILL HAPPEN. YES. THEY DID NOT TAKE THAT OUT.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU. BECAUSE I WOULD BE UPSET IF IT WERE.

THAT'S STILL IN PLACE.

YES. OKAY.

DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? WE'RE GOOD. DOES ANYONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL STICK MY NECK OUT AGAIN.

WELL I'M GOING TO CUT IT OFF.

SO FAR, IT'S STILL INTACT.

I'M GOING TO MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR AUSTIN COLONY, SECTION ONE A AND RECOMMEND THE PLAT TO THE COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION.

ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION. IS THERE A SECOND? AND SO THAT YOU ALL MAY HELP ME.

IT HELPS WHEN I HAVE A A COMPLETE RECORD, NUMBER ONE, AND THEN A COMPLETE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL.

SO I THINK IT'S OKAY TO MAKE A MOTION FOR SOMETHING TO VOTE AGAINST IT.

SO WHEN YOU DON'T HAVE A VOTE UP OR DOWN, TECHNICALLY.

OKAY, YEAH, IT MAKES IT REAL.

SO I HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MCDANIEL AND A SECOND BY MR. MUNSON. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CAN I JUST CLARIFY FOR THE RECORD AND FOR MYSELF REAL QUICK? WE'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN.

COUNCIL'S ALREADY APPROVED THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN.

THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THESE LOTS IS COMPLIANT WITH WHAT WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN THE..

THE BLESSING IN THE PD.

YES, MA'AM. IT MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS.

YES, MA'AM. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL DO THIS ONE BY RAISE OF HANDS, IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS .

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY RAISING YOUR RIGHT HAND.

ONE, TWO, THREE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED. SAME THING.

ONE, TWO, THREE, FOUR.

OKAY, SO WE ARE 3 TO 4 ON THAT ONE.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

ITEM 12, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A FINAL PLAT FOR RIVERWOOD RANCH, SECTION THREE.

[12. Discussion and possible action on a Final Plat for Riverwood Ranch Section 3. The proposed final plat consists of approximately 73 single family residential lots on approximately 35.62 acres and is generally located north of Hospital Drive between N. Downing Street to the west and Buchta Road to the east.]

THE PROPOSED FINAL PLAT CONSISTS OF APPROXIMATELY 73 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS ON APPROXIMATELY 35.62 ACRES AND IS GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF HOSPITAL DRIVE BETWEEN NORTH DOWNING STREET TO THE WEST AND BUCKNER ROAD TO THE EAST.

MR. SPRIGGS.

THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS RIVERWOOD RANCH SUBDIVISION OF 35.62 ACRES NORTH OF HOSPITAL ROAD BETWEEN DOWNING AND BUCKNER ROAD.

THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION YOU HAVE SEEN BEFORE.

THIS IS JUST FOR THE FINAL PLAT.

THE SUBDIVISION IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION CURRENTLY, THE SECTIONS ONE AND TWO HAVE PROCEEDED ON, AND THIS IS SECTION THREE.

THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ARE BEING REVIEWED.

THEY HAVE SUBMITTED PLAT FOR THIS SECTION THREE FINAL TO MOVE FORWARD TO COUNCIL AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL NOW THAT THEY HAVE SUBMITTED THE TEN COMMENTS THAT WERE RECOGNIZED IN THE REVIEW BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL.

AND LIKE I SAID, WE'RE STILL COORDINATING THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.

SO ANY CONDITIONS OUTSTANDING OF THE CITY ENGINEER WOULD HAVE TO BE MET.

[01:05:01]

BUT WE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL THUS FAR OF THE FINAL PLAT TO MOVE FORWARD.