Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

>> READY TO THE RIGHT? READY TO THE LEFT? WE'LL GO AHEAD AND GET STARTED.

[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:04]

WELCOME TO OUR ANGLE TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATED TUESDAY, APRIL THE 25TH, OF 2023, AT 06:00 PM.

WE DO HAVE A QUORUM PRESENT, SO I'LL GO IN CAUSE TO ORDER.

[NOISE] THANK YOU ALL FOR ATTENDING TONIGHT.

WE HAVE SOME SPECIAL GUESTS IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT AND WILL RECOGNIZE THOSE INDIVIDUALS TONIGHT.

IF YOU'LL PLEASE RISE WITH US, THEY WILL OFFER OUR PLEDGE AND INVOCATION.

>>

>> I'D ASK THAT YOU PRAY WITH ME.

PLEASE, FATHER, AGAIN, WE COME TO YOU, THANKING YOU FOR A LOT OF YOUR LOVE, A LOT OF YOUR BLESSINGS THAT ARE JUST BEYOND IMAGINATION.

FATHER, THANK YOU TONIGHT THAT WE CAN CALL UPON YOU AT ANY TIME, AND ESPECIALLY NOW THAT YOU LEAD US TONIGHT AND THESE DELIBERATIONS THAT WE HAVE BEFORE US.

FATHER, I GIVE THANKS FOR THOSE WHO'VE BEEN CELEBRATED TONIGHT.

FATHER AT THE SAME TIME, WE WANT TO OFFER YOUR PEACE IN THE LIFE OF A COUPLE OF FAMILIES HERE, RECENTLY LOST LOVED ONES HERE IN TOWN, APOLOGISTS, PEOPLE THAT WE'VE COME TO KNOW AND LOVE.

FATHER BE WITH THEM CLOSELY.

LORD, HELP US GIVE US YOUR WISDOM TONIGHT, GUIDE US AND DIRECT US, AND WE GIVE YOU PRAISE IN CHRIST'S NAME. AMEN.

>> AMEN.

>> IF YOU'LL JUST CONTINUE TO STAY JUST FOR A MOMENT.

AS MR. BOOTH SAID, WE'VE LOST A COUPLE OF INDIVIDUALS FROM OUR COMMUNITY AND I'M GOING OFF TRACK HERE.

I APOLOGIZE, MS. ATTORNEY.

BUT IF WE COULD JUST MAYBE HAVE A MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THOSE TWO INDIVIDUALS.

ONE OF THEM WAS A PART OF OUR COMMUNITY.

SHE WAS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAD A LOT OF INPUT FOR A LOT OF THINGS AND IT MEANT A LOT TO A LOT OF INDIVIDUALS, NOT ONLY TO THE CITY BUT ALSO TO OTHER ORGANIZATIONS WITHIN THE CITY.

WE JUST HAVE A MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS.

I'LL GREATLY APPRECIATE IT SO WILL THE COUNCIL. THANK YOU.

>> WE'LL GET TO THE PART OF OUR PRESENTATION.

THERE'S CITIZENS WISHING TO ADDRESS COUNCIL.

MS. MICHELLE, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY I DIDN'T SEE.

WE HAVE NOBODY WATCHING TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS,

[1. Presentation of April 2023 Keep Angleton Beautiful Yard of the Month and Business of the Month.]

AND THESE ARE ALWAYS THE FUN THINGS AND POSITIVE THINGS THAT ARE MADE OF THE POSITIVE THINGS GOING ON IN OUR COMMUNITY, AND SO WE'RE GOING TO RECOGNIZE FIRST OF ALL, OUR PRESENTATION OF 2023, KEEP ANGLETON BEAUTIFUL YARD OF THE MONTH AND BUSINESS OF THE MONTHS.

I'LL TOSS IT OVER TO THE KAB FOLKS AND ALLOW THEM TO DO THAT PRESENTATION.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. I WOULD LIKE TO FIRST BRING UP OUR YARD OF THE MONTH WINNERS FOR APRIL.

WE HAVE JONATHAN AND NATALIE EBERT SPATCHER.

I KNEW IT WAS GOING TO MESS IT UP, EBERT SPATCHER.

>> OLIVER.

>> OLIVER, AND THEY LIVE AT 600 NORTHRIDGE STREETS, AND WE'RE NOW REALLY LOOKING FOR OUR YARD OF THE MONTH. [APPLAUSE]

>> JUST ON BEHALF OF COUNSEL, THE CITIZENS OF ANGLETON AND KEEP ANGLETON BEAUTIFUL, THANK YOU.

YOUR PLACE IS BEAUTIFUL.

YOU CAN'T MISS IT WHEN YOU DRIVE BY.

>> ABOUT THERE.

>> YES.

>> NORTHRIDGE.

>> NO CORNER AND THERE'S A NORTHRIDGE.

>> COUNSEL, IF YOU'LL GO TO THE FRONT.

[BACKGROUND] [APPLAUSE] [LAUGHTER]

>> NEXT WE'RE GOING TO GO TO OUR BUSINESS OF THE MONTH AND WORKING IN BY CHIEF MYERS UP HERE FOR THIS PRESENTATION.

FIRST, WE WANT TO THANK THEM FOR THEIR SERVICE AND WHAT THEY GIVE TO THE COMMUNITY, AND ALL THEY DO TO SUPPORT US AND EVERYTHING.

WE WANT TO SAY THANK YOU THERE ON BEHALF OF COUNCIL, KEEP ANGLETON BEAUTIFUL, AND OUR CITIZENS FOR WHAT YOU DO WITH SUPPORTING US.

[00:05:04]

BUT ALSO WANT TO RECOGNIZE WHAT YOU DO FOR MAKING A BEAUTIFUL PLACE TO LIVE.

IF YOU'VE SEEN THE PICTURES THAT HAVE ENABLED DRIVE-BY THE FIRE STATION, THEY REALLY TAKE PRIDE IN IT AND WE REALLY APPRECIATE THAT AND WANTED TO NOMINATE AND RECOGNIZE YOU GUYS TODAY.

>> THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE]

>> MOVING RIGHT ALONG, THERE'S OUR CIRCLE ON OUR PRESENTATION ITEM NUMBER 2.

[2. Presentation of Angleton Police Officer of the Year by the Exchange Club of Angleton.]

PRESENTATION OF ANGLETON POLICE OFFICER OF THE YEAR BY THE STATE OF ANGLETON, ROBIN COME ON NOW.

>> HI, GOOD EVENING COUNCIL AND VICE PRESIDENT I'M ROBIN GARRETT I'M THE PRESIDENT OF THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF ANGLETON AND WE ARE A SERVICE CLUB IN TOWN THAT HAS FOUR PROGRAMS AND SERVICE.

ONE IS COMMUNITY, ONE IS AMERICANISM, ONE IS YOUTH, AND ONE IS CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION, AND I AM HERE TODAY AS PART OF OUR COMMUNITY PROGRAM AND SERVICE TO RECOGNIZE OUR ANGLETON POLICE OFFICER OF THE YEAR.

ON APRIL THE 13TH OUR OFFICER WAS RECOGNIZED BY THE TEXAS LOUISIANA GULF COAST DISTRICT OF EXCHANGE CLUBS AT A SPECIAL LUNCHEON UP IN SUGARLAND, AND WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE RECOGNIZE THIS OFFICER LOCALLY AS WELL.

IF I COULD GET TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR MARISSA MARTINEZ TO COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE? [APPLAUSE] I'D LIKE TO TELL YOU A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT HER DEPARTMENT HAD TO SAY ABOUT HER.

A TELECOMMUNICATIONS OPERATOR IS PART OF THE FIRST RESPONDER TEAM BEING THE FIRST LINE OF CONTACT FOR CITIZENS IN NATIVE POLICE, FIRE, AND EMS. THIS CAREER IS OFTEN MISUNDERSTOOD AND IS BEING SOLELY CLERICAL BUT IT IS SO MUCH MORE.

WHILE WE TAKE NOTHING AWAY FROM THE POLICE OFFICERS HERE TODAY AND ALL THE HEROIC ACTS SOME MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ABLE TO ATTEND IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE PERSON BEHIND THE RADIO, THE PERSON THAT ASKED ALL THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO EXTRACT VITAL INFORMATION.

THE PERSON THAT PAINTS THE PICTURE BEFORE ANYONE ARRIVES ON SCENE, ENSURING OFFICERS AND EMERGENCY PERSONNEL RETURN HOME TO THEIR FAMILIES SAFELY.

THE PERSON THAT GIVES CPR INSTRUCTIONS TO A SCREAMING LOVED ONE AND MAKES SURE EVERYONE IS OUT OF THE HOME SAFE WHEN A FIRE IGNITES.

EMERGENCY DISPATCHING IS NOT JUST A CAREER, IT IS A CALLING, AND MARISSA MARTINEZ REPRESENTS THAT PERSON.

MARISSA HAS A BACHELOR'S DEGREE IN CRIMINOLOGY FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON AND STARTED HER CAREER WITH ANGLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT IN NOVEMBER OF 2017, WHERE SHE JUMPED IN WITH BOTH FEET EXCELS WITH ALL THAT SHE SETS HER MIND TO.

MARISSA WALTON, ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS CERTIFICATION.

SHE'S A FIELD TRAINING OPERATOR.

SHE IS CERTIFIED AS AN EMERGENCY MEDICAL DISPATCHER, AS WELL AS BEING ANGLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT'S LEAD TELECOMMUNICATION OVER THE TEXAS PUBLIC SAFETY REPORTING SYSTEM.

MARISSA TAKES HER JOB SERIOUSLY, BUT IT'S ALWAYS THERE TO HELP BRIGHTEN THE DAY.

MARISSA IS QUITE THE COMEDIAN, AND AS WE ALL LOOK FORWARD TO HER HUMERUS WEATHER REPORTS, MARISSA IS AN ASSET TO THE PATROL AND COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION, AS WELL AS THE ANGLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT.

TCO MARISSA MARTINEZ WAS VOTED ON BY HER PEERS AS THE ANGLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT 2022 SUPPORT PERSON OF THE YEAR, AND I'M PROUD TO PRESENT HER AS THE EXCHANGE CLUB OF ANGLETON, ANGLETON OFFICER OF THE YEAR.

[APPLAUSE] I HAVE FOR YOU ALSO METAL AND A RIBBON TO WEAR ON YOUR SHIRT AND TO DENOTE THIS HONOR THAT HAS BEEN BESTOWED AND ALSO A LITTLE MONETARY CONTRIBUTION FOR MY CLUB FOR YOUR USE.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE IT AND WE WOULD LIKE TO GET A PICTURE, PLEASE, AND I WOULD LIKE TO ASK BREE CANOPIO ALSO A MEMBER OF THE EXCHANGE CLUB ANGLETON THAT COME UP WITH US.

>> I THINK YOU SHOULD GRAB THE POLICE CHIEF WITH YOU. [BACKGROUND] [LAUGHTER]

>> LOOPY BE MATCHING YOUR OFFICER UP THERE.

>> YOU'RE GETTING THIRSTY. [LAUGHTER]

>> THANK YOU. [APPLAUSE]

>> MOVING RIGHT ALONG,

[3. Presentation for dedication and leadership with Angleton University.]

ANOTHER CEREMONIAL PRESENTATION, FOR DEDICATION AND LEADERSHIP WITH ANGLETON UNIVERSITY.

[00:10:06]

AS YOU KNOW, WE ARE IN OUR SECOND CLASS AVAILABLE TO UNIVERSITY.

THAT'S WHERE A RESIDENT OF OUR COMMUNITY COMES AND DOES PROBLEMS LIKE THIS.

THIS IS SELF-CONTROL CLASS STUDY AND THEY LEARN MORE ABOUT CITIES OPERATION.

THIS IS OUR SECOND CLASS LED HERE BY THOMAS 10-WEEK PROGRAM, AND THAT WAS LED BY STAFF.

THIS IS ANOTHER GROUP AND SO WE WANT TO RECOGNIZE THEM, THEY FINISHED, THEY HIT THEIR CAPSTONE.

WE WANT TO RECOGNIZE AND HONOR THOSE INDIVIDUALS WHO PARTICIPATED IN THAT PROGRAM.

I WILL TURN IT OVER TO OUR LEADER OVER HERE, MEET DIANA, AND LET HER FOR TODAY, AND THEN WE'LL HAVE CLASS COME UP WE TAKE A PHOTO WITH YOUR COUNCIL.

>> AGAIN, THANK YOU EVERYONE WHO WENT THROUGH THIS PROGRAM, I HOPE YOU LEARNED MUCH FROM IT AND WE'RE SO EXCITED THAT WE'VE GOT TO DO THIS IN SECOND YEAR.

WE'RE LOOKING FORWARD TO DOING THIS AGAIN A THIRD YEAR, RELAY THIS INFORMATION TO YOUR COMMUNITY, LET THEM KNOW WHAT YOU LEARNED, WHAT THEY CAN EXPECT TO LEARN FROM IT.

AS WE MOVE FORWARD, TONIGHT WE'RE PRESENTING YOU WITH YOUR CERTIFICATES OF GRADUATION FOR COMPLETING THE COURSE.

THANKS AGAIN, ALL OF YOU COUNCIL FOR BEING HERE TONIGHT TO WISH THEM THE BEST IN WHAT THEY DID.

MAYOR, I WILL HAND THE CERTIFICATES TO YOU SO THAT YOU CAN CALL EACH ONE.

DAPHNE BROWN WILL BE OUR FIRST.

[APPLAUSE] THE NEXT WILL BE PERLA CAMACHO.

[APPLAUSE] NEXT WE HAVE JENNIFER CONNOR [APPLAUSE] WE HAVE PATTI COOPER, [APPLAUSE] SARAH LAURA.

[APPLAUSE] SHE'S SO PRETTY.

KAITLYN LOPEZ [APPLAUSE], HEIDI SIERRA ROCKER [APPLAUSE].

LAST BUT NOT LEAST, DAVID STARK JR. [APPLAUSE]

>> [BACKGROUND].

>> BEFORE WE DO THE PHOTO OP WITH THE CLASS, WE ALSO NEED TO GET THE CLASS LATER UP HERE.

DIANA, YOU DON'T KNOW THIS, BUT ON BEHALF OF COUNCIL AND THE CITY, WE WANT GIVE YOU A CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION FOR YOUR OUTSTANDING DEDICATION LEADERSHIP WITH THE ANGLETON UNIVERSITY.

SHE WAS GIVEN THIS TASK BEFORE THEY WE'RE SUPPOSED TO START.

SHE TOOK THE BALL AND DID A GREAT JOB WITH THESE INDIVIDUALS AND TALKING TO THEM, THEY'D SAID DIANA WAS ABOVE BOARD AND SHE WAS GREAT TO THEM.

DIANA, PLEASE COME ACCEPT THIS CERTIFICATE AND GET A PHOTO UP WITH US.

[APPLAUSE]

>> [BACKGROUND] [LAUGHTER] [APPLAUSE]

>> ALTHOUGH THE PARTY, BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR THE NEXT CLASS, I'M SURE PROBABLY SOMETIME PROBABLY TOWARD THE END OF THE YEAR, IT MIGHT BEGIN IN THE NEXT YEAR.

IF YOU HAVE ANYBODY WHO'S INTERESTED, WE HIGHLY ENCOURAGE THOSE FOLKS TO GET INVOLVED IN AND GO THROUGH THE UNIVERSITY ANNUAL TEAM PROGRAM.

ITEM HERE BEFORE THE PRESENTATION OF MUNICIPAL CLERK WEEK PROCLAMATION.

[4. Presentation of Municipal Clerk Week Proclamation.]

MICHELLE, DO YOU WANT TO COME UP?

[00:15:02]

COME ON UP, YOU'RE PART OF THIS GROUP.

I THINK SHE WANTS TO. YEAH. IS YOUR ASSISTANT WITH YOU TONIGHT? IS SHE HERE TO SEE?

>> YES.

>> OKAY. COME ON UP OVER HERE.

WHAT I HAVE HERE IS A PROCLAMATION FROM THE MAYOR'S OFFICE, CITY OF ANGLETON.

WHEREAS THE OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK, A TIME HONOR IN BALLPARK OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT EXISTS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD, AND WHEREAS THE OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK IS THE OLDEST AMONG PUBLIC SERVANTS, AND WHEREAS THE OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLARK PROVIDES THE PROFESSIONAL LINK BETWEEN THE CITIZENS, THE LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES, AND AGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT AT OTHER LEVELS, AND WHEREAS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS HAVE PLEDGED TO BE MINDFUL OF THEIR NEUTRALITY AND IMPARTIALITY, RENDERING EQUAL SERVICE TO ALL.

WHEREAS THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK SERVES AS AN INFORMATION CENTER ON FUNCTIONS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND COMMUNITY.

WHEREAS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK CONTINUES STRIDES TO IMPROVE THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE AFFAIRS OF THE OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK THROUGH PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATION PROGRAMS, SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS, AND ANNUAL MEETINGS OF THEIR STATE, PROVINCE, COUNTY, AND INTERNATIONAL PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS.

WHEREAS IS THE MOST APPROPRIATE THAT WE RECOGNIZE THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF THE OFFICE OF THE PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THE CITY OF ANGLETON DOES HEREBY PROCLAIM APRIL 30TH THROUGH MAY THE 6TH AS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK WEEK, AND FURTHER EXTENDS APPRECIATION TO OUR PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL COURT, MICHELLE PEREZ, AND TO ALL PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERKS FOR THE VITAL SERVICES THEY PERFORMED AND THEIR EXEMPLARY, DEDICATION TO THEIR COMMUNITIES THEY ARE PRESENT AND PROCLAIM THE WEEK OF APRIL 30TH TILL MAY 6TH AS PROFESSIONAL MUNICIPAL CLERK WEEK.

PROCLAIM THIS DAY 25 OF APRIL 2023, CITY OF ANGLETON, MAYOR PEREZ JASON.

MAYO PEREZ, HERE YOU GO, CONGRATULATIONS.

[APPLAUSE] NOW WE GO TO THE TABLE.

>> WE'LL TAKE A BREAK, I'M EXHAUSTED.

[LAUGHTER].

>> NOT THAT ALL DAY. [BACKGROUND]

>> [BACKGROUND]

>> LET ME GET MY COMPUTER BACK UP.

THAT COMPLETES ALL OF OUR CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

BEAR WITH ME, GOT A LITTLE BIT TO READ HERE AS WELL.

ITEM NUMBER 5.

DISCUSS ANY POSSIBLE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 20230425-005 BY THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS, DENYING THE DISTRIBUTION COST RECOVERY FACTOR RATE REQUESTS OF THE TEXAS, NEW MEXICO POWER COMPANY MADE ON OR ABOUT APRIL 5TH, 2023.

AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN A COALITION OF SIMILAR SITUATED CITIES, AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION IN RELATED RATE PROCEEDINGS, REQUIRING THE REIMBURSEMENT OF MUNICIPAL RATE CASE EXPENSES, AUTHORIZING THE RETENTION OF SPECIAL COUNSEL, FINDING THAT THE MEETING COMPLIES WITH THE OPEN MEETINGS ACT, MAKING OTHER FINDINGS AND PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE SUBJECT, AND DECLARING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

ITEM NUMBER 6, DISCUSS OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN AIA AGREEMENT WITH MECHANA CONTRACTING INC. TO REPAIR AND RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS OF ANGLETON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY TO US TENNIS ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.

NUMBER 7, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO INCLUDE MISSOURI COUNTY IN ANGLETON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT EMPLOYEES TO THE ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER DISCOUNT CATEGORY.

NUMBER 8, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 THROUGH 2024. COUNSEL.

>> MR. MAYOR, I MOVE WE ADOPT CONSENT AGENDA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF PULLING ITEMS NUMBER 6 AND 8.

>> HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> SECOND.

>> HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILWOMAN DANIEL.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN. THE MOTION CARRIES.

NOW WE'LL GO BACK TO ITEM NUMBER 6, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS ON THE AIA AGREEMENT

[6. Discussion and possible action on an AIA agreement with McKenna Contracting, Inc. to repair and resurface tennis courts on Angleton Independent School District property to U.S. Tennis Association (USTA) specifications and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement.]

WITH MECHANIC CONTRACTING. YES, MEGAN.

[00:20:01]

>> EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS IN REGARDS TO AN AGREEMENT WITH MECHANIC CONTRACTING INC., WHO IS THE ONLY BIDDER RATHER FOR OUR RESURFACING REHABILITATION PROJECT FOR THE DOWNING TENNIS COURTS.

IF YOU ALL RECALL, IN 2022, WE DID SIGN AN AGREEMENT WITH THE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT TO DO A COLLABORATIVE REHABILITATION PROJECT, AND SO THIS RFP WENT OUT FOR BID IN SEPTEMBER.

WE CLOSED IT IN SEPTEMBER.

WE HAD ONE BID FROM A REPUTABLE COMPANY WHO WE'VE USED FOR RESURFACING PROJECTS, AND SO WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT AGREEMENT.

WE WORKED ON DEVELOPING THAT AGREEMENT WITH RANDALL LAW OFFICE, AND WE HAVE THAT AGREEMENT HERE ATTACHED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL.

>> THANK YOU, MS. MEGAN.

>> THE QUESTION I HAVE IS ON THE AGENDA SUMMARY, FUNDS REQUESTED IS IN A, AND I KNOW THAT THE BUDGETED AMOUNT SAYS 55,620, DO WE STAY TO THE BUDGETED AMOUNT? THEN THE OTHER PART OF THAT IS, WE'RE PAYING ALL OF IT AND THEN AISD IS PAYING US HALF OF IT BACK, CORRECT?

>> YES. LET ME DETAIL THIS A LITTLE BIT MORE FOR YOU ALL.

BECAUSE THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT INCLUDED RESURFACING, IT ALSO INCLUDED FENCE REPAIR.

THESE ARE TWO COMPLETELY SEPARATE PROJECTS WITH DIFFERENT CONTRACTORS.

WHAT YOU HAVE IN HERE WITH THE AIA IS SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO THE RESURFACING AND RELOCATION OF THE NETS, ETC.

AISD HAS AGREED TO PAY 50 PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE PROJECT, SO NOT ONLY THE RESURFACING BUT ALSO THE FENCE REPAIRS.

WHAT YOU HAVE IN HERE FOR YOUR BUDGETED AMOUNT IS WHAT WE HAVE BUDGETED FOR THE PROJECT IN ITS ENTIRETY.

BUT WHAT WE HAVE NOTED AND INFORMED AISD IS, ONCE WE HAVE RECEIVED THE INITIAL INVOICE FROM MECHANIC CONTRACTORS, WE WILL BE REQUESTING THEIR PAYMENT.

WHILE WE MAY BE SENDING A CHECKOUT, ONCE WE HAVE FINAL COMPLETION, WE SHOULD RECEIVE THOSE FUNDS IN THROUGH AISD SIMULTANEOUSLY OR PRIOR TO ISSUING THE FULL PAYMENT FOR MECHANIC CONTRACTING INC.

>> IS THE SCHOOL DISTRICT GOOD WITH THIS NUMBER?

>> YES. THEY APPROVED THIS NUMBER BACK IN JUNE OF 2022.

>> THIS BID AMOUNT I'M TALKING ABOUT.

>> CORRECT. THE PROJECT AND THE BID AMOUNT, WE HAD THESE PRELIMINARY NUMBERS BEFORE WE WENT OUT FOR THE BID.

IT ACTUALLY CAME IN UNDER THE PRICE THAT WE HAD ORIGINALLY RECEIVED QUOTES FOR.

YES, THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROJECT IS ACTUALLY GOING TO COME IN LESS THAN WE EXPECTED.

>> THANK YOU.

>> JUST A REMINDER, COUNCILMAN, IT'S PURSUANT TO AN INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT.

SO YOU APPROVED THE INNER LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH AISD PREVIOUSLY, SO THAT'S WHERE THE 50 PERCENT COMES ABOUT.

>> THANK YOU.

>> YOU SAID THAT THIS 55,620 DOESN'T INCLUDE THE FENCING.

>> THIS AMOUNT, IT WILL NOT INCLUDE THE FENCING, SO THE OVERALL PROJECT IS AROUND, I WANT TO SAY 90,000.

>> THAT'D BE SOMETHING JUST PUSHED AT A LATER TIME.

>> I'M SORRY.

>> WELL, THE FENCING WILL COME UP TO US AT A LATER TIME IS I GUESS [OVERLAPPING]

>> YES. WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT AS FAR AS TIMELINE AT THE CONTRACTORS HAVE SAID, A TENTATIVE TIMELINE START DATE IS JUNE 5TH.

WE HAVE ALREADY BEGUN COMMUNICATING WITH SINGLETON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.

THEY'RE VERY EXCITED.

WE'RE WORKING WITH THEIR MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT TO BRING IN, NOT ONLY THE FENCE CONTRACTOR BUT MECHANIC INC, AS WELL AS GULF COAST TENNIS ASSOCIATION, WHO'S AGREED TO BUILD BACKSTOPS FOR THIS AMENITY AS WELL.

WE'RE ALL COMING TO THE TABLE SO THAT WE CAN KEEP THE PROJECT ON SCHEDULE.

AS WE BEGAN RESURFACING, THE FENCE CONTRACTOR WILL REMOVE THE EXISTING FENCING TO ALLOW FOR ROOM.

WE'LL HAVE MCKINNEY DO THEIR WORK, INSTALL FENCING AND BACKBOARD, SO THAT'S THE PLAN.

>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION. WE APPROVE THE AIA AGREEMENT WITH MCKINNEY CONTRACTING TO PREPARE AND RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS AND ANGLETON INDEPENDENT ISD PROPERTY TO THE US TENNIS ASSOCIATION SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZE CITY OF [INAUDIBLE] TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.

>> SECOND.

>> HAVE A BEAR BY COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.

THAT MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU, MS. MEGAN.

MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 8,

[8. Discussion and possible action to approve the budget schedule for Fiscal Year 2023-24.]

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE BUDGET SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023 THROUGH 2024.

I GUESS THAT'D BE MR. FEEL.

>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

YOU HAVE IN YOUR PACKET THE PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR THE BUDGET.

[00:25:03]

THE STAFF WILL BEGIN WORKING ON THE BUDGET NEXT WEEK.

THE CITY MANAGER AND I WILL BE MEETING WITH EACH DEPARTMENT HEAD SOMETIME IN EARLY JUNE TO GO OVER THE BUDGET SO THAT WE CAN PRESENT TO YOU A BUDGET BY EARLY JULY.

>> THE REASON I PULLED IT FROM CONSENT WAS SO THAT THE COUNCIL IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS ABOUT THE DATES, YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO GIVE SOME INPUT.

I GUESS MY QUESTION IS AROUND, WHEN WILL THE PRELIMINARY VALUES RECEIVED AT THE END OF MAY.

DO YOU HAVE A SPECIFIC TIME? I KNOW THAT THE TAX OFFICE JUST SENT OUT A MEETING REQUEST FOR THURSDAY.

>> I'LL BE IN A MEETING THURSDAY WITH THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT AND THE TAX ASSESSOR AND IN ALL THE TAXING ENTITIES.

AT THAT POINT, I'M HOPING TO GET EARLY NUMBER BUT I REALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO PRESENT.

THEN WE JUST HAVE BASICALLY AT THEIR MERCY, AS FAR AS WHEN WE GET THE PRELIMINARY NUMBERS.

>> I WISH I COULD REMEMBER EVERYTHING MS. BALONIC TOLD US WEDNESDAY NIGHT BUT THEY ARE HELD BY STATUTE TO CERTAIN DATES.

THEY HAVE TO HAVE THIS INFORMATION TO US.

SO IF THEY GET IT TO US EARLIER THEN THAT'S FINE.

BUT I WOULDN'T. MAYBE CHRIS OR JASON CAN REMEMBER THOSE DATES.

I CAN'T. I WAS EATING AT THE TIME.

[LAUGHTER]

>> TO YOUR POINT, THERE IS ONE ITEM THAT WE NEED TO ADD TO THIS.

WE NEED TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT HOMESTEAD AND OVER 65 AND OTHER EXEMPTIONS AND THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BEFORE JUNE 30TH.

>> I WAS GOING TO ASK THAT QUESTION.

>> WE'RE GOING TO BRING THAT UP TO COUNCIL MEETING SHORTLY TO PUT THAT ON SO YOU CAN GIVE US LEGITIMATE DIRECTIONS SO THAT WE CAN GO BACK TO APPRAISAL DISTRICT.

>> FOR THE CITIZENS THAT ARE HERE OR LISTENING, JULY 8TH IS A SATURDAY BUDGET WORKSHOP AND THAT'S A TIME FOR ANYBODY TO COME AND WATCH OR TO LISTEN OR ASK QUESTIONS.

WE DO IT ON SATURDAYS TO ALLOW PEOPLE THE OPPORTUNITY AND IT GIVES US A HEAD START ON THE BUDGET, BUT I WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE ENGAGED.

>> MY QUESTION IS, IS SATURDAY, JULY 8TH, ENOUGH TIME FOR YOU ALL TO HAVE EVERYTHING READY FOR US? BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO REHEARSE THE PAST, BUT I SPENT A SATURDAY HERE LAST YEAR WHERE WE WERE WORKING WITH NUMBERS THAT WERE JUST FICTION AND WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME DEBATING AND NEGOTIATING OVER, PERHAPS WHAT WE COULD PULL, WHAT WE COULD ADD AND THOSE FIGURES WERE LATER UNDERSTOOD TO BE COMPLETELY INCORRECT AND I NOW UNDERSTAND THERE WAS A TRANSITION, SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE GIVING YOU ALL PLENTY OF TIME TO HAVE THOSE NUMBERS SO THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH REAL NUMBERS SO WE CAN START PLANNING ON DECISIONS FOR THE FUTURE.

I JUST WANT US TO BE FAIR, BECAUSE I THINK IT'S FAIR TO THE CITY COUNCIL IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE US UP HERE ALL DAY AND WE OBVIOUSLY TAKE ON THAT RESPONSIBILITY BY VOLUNTEERING TO DO THIS, BUT WE ALSO HAVE TO HAVE WHAT I THINK IS A FAIR AND TRANSPARENT CONVERSATION, AND IF WE'RE DEALING WITH NUMBERS THAT AREN'T REALISTIC OR HAVE NO FOUNDATION ON WHAT WE REALLY HAVE, THEN I THINK WE'RE NOT DOING ANYBODY A SERVICE.

>> I'M REQUIRED BY THE CHARTER TO SUBMIT THE BUDGET BY THE 1ST OF JULY BASED OFF THE PRELIMINARY NUMBERS.

AS WE DISCUSSED BEFORE, WE'RE GOING TO PUT IT IN THE INCREASES IN INSURANCE OR HEALTHCARE OR WHATEVER THEY ARE, AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO PUT THINGS IN COLUMNS AND SAY, IF WE WANT TO DO A STEP PLAN FOR PD, THIS IS WHAT THE COST WOULD BE.

WHEN WE [INAUDIBLE] THE DIRECTION WENT LAST YEAR, THEN WE PUT STUFF IN AT THE END.

I'LL USE THE STEP PAYING FOR PD AS AN EXAMPLE, SO IF THAT COST IS $250,000, AGAIN, MAYBE WE DON'T WANT TO DO IT ALL IN ONE YEAR, WE AGREE TO PHASE IT OVER A COUPLE OF YEARS.

WHEN WE LOOK AT THOSE NUMBERS, SOMEONE WILL BE PRETTY DOUBTING RMS AND THOSE THINGS, AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL THAT, BUT WE'RE GOING TO GIVE IT TO YOU JUST STACKED.

AGAIN, WE'VE GOT SOME THOUGHTS ABOUT COLON.

[00:30:02]

WE MAY PUT A LITTLE COLON THERE AND AGAIN, GET YOUR END-OF-THE-DAY GUIDANCE ON HOW WE NEED TO ADJUST THAT MAKE NUMBERS FOR IT.

BUT REALLY BY THE 25TH OF JULY WHEN WE GET THE CERTIFIED NUMBERS, THAT'S WHAT IT IS.

>> I UNDERSTAND. I JUST FELT LIKE THE NUMBERS THAT WERE GIVEN LAST YEAR, WE WERE LED TO BELIEVE, I THINK ALMOST A MILLION DOLLARS[OVERLAPPING]

>> NORMALLY, AND I WOULD HOPE THAT WE PROVIDE A BETTER PRODUCT TO YOU THIS YEAR.

>> THANK YOU.

>> MR. MAYOR, I MOVE WE ADOPT THE PROPOSED 2023/2024 BUDGET SCHEDULE.

>> SECOND.

>> HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GONGORA. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

>> [LAUGHTER] MOTION BEFORE I HAD A CHANCE TO SAY, I WILL NOT BE HERE EITHER COUNCIL MEETING IN AUGUST.

>> OUR TRIP PLANNED.

>> NO.

>> YOU ALL WANT TO COME ALONG [LAUGHTER]

>> HOPEFULLY WE'VE PASSED IT.

>> HOPEFULLY PASTE IT ALL OUT.

THEY WILL JUST BE AN ADMINISTRATIVE DEAL.

>> THANK YOU MR. BOOTH. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, CONCERNS? HEARING NONE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING, AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SIGN MOTION CARRIES.

THAT COMPLETES OUR CONSENT AGENDA.

MOVING RIGHT ALONG TO REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS. NUMBER 9, DISCUSSION UPDATE BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,

[9. Discussion and update by the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDot) on the traffic light located at Highway 35 and 288B and any other potential concerns.]

ALSO KNOWN AS TEXT DOT ON THE TRAFFIC LIGHT LOCATED AT HIGHWAY 35 AND 288 BUSINESS.

AND ANY OTHER POTENTIAL CONCERNS, CHRIS?

>> THANK YOU FOR ATTENDING TODAY TO GIVE US AN UPDATE.

IN FRONT OF YOU YOU HAVE EMAIL UPDATE THAT WAS FORWARDED THIS WEEK.

SO HE'S HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS OR DO A COUPLE OF UPDATES FOR YOU ALL AND CHART THE PATH FORWARD.

>>ALL RIGHT.

>> GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS AND MAYOR, THANK YOU EVERYBODY FOR INVITING ME.

I WANT TO TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY FIRST TO HAVE A SAFETY MOMENT.

SPEEDING IS RELATED TO 1/3 OF FATALITIES IN OUR ROADWAYS.

WE WANT TO CREATE AWARENESS OF THE SPEED IN OUR ROADS.

PLAN AHEAD, KNOW THE CONDITIONS OF THE ROADWAY.

CHECK THE WAY THERE SO YOU CAN GET THERE SAFELY AND COME BACK SAFELY.

WE CAN CONTROL WHAT WE DO.

WE CANNOT CONTROL WHAT OTHERS DO.

BUT IF WE HAVE CONTROL OF WHAT WE DO, WE'RE DOING OUR PART.

SO BE INTENTIONAL ABOUT BEING SAFE AND CONSIDER THE SPEED LIMIT.

WITH THAT, I WANT TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE.

SO WE HAVE TWO PROJECTS RIGHT NOW THROUGH THE CITY OF ANGLETON.

ONE IS ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 35 FROM FM 523 ON THE NORTH TO STATE HIGHWAY 288 ON THIS SOUTHWEST.

THAT PROJECT IS ALMOST DONE.

THE ONLY THING WAITING THERE IS THE INSTALLATION OF A FEW SIGNS AND THE ACTIVATION OF THE RAIDERS.

THE DETECTION FACILITIES AT THE SIGNALS.

I KNOW THESE ARE CONCERN, ESPECIALLY ON 35 AND BUSINESS 288 AND 35 AND LOOP 274.

RIGHT NOW THEY ARE ON A TIMER WHICH IS MANAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR.

BUT WITHIN THIS WEEK OR NEXT WEEK, TEXTDOT IS GOING TO BE ACTIVATING THOSE DETECTION SYSTEM.

SO HE'S GOING TO DETECT WHEN THERE'S A VEHICLE IN THE INTERSECTION AND IT'S GOING TO SWITCH FROM A TIMING TO A DETECTION.

ON THE OTHER PROJECT WE HAVE, WHICH IS A PROJECT ON BUSINESS 288 AND LOOP 274 FROM FM 523 TO THE NORTH TO CEMETERY ROAD, THAT PROJECT WE STILL PENDING SOME PERMANENT STRIPING IN SOME LOCATIONS, THE WEATHER HAVE REALLY IMPACTED THE CONTRACTOR FOR COMPLETING THOSE.

WE ARE WAITING. WE ARE STILL WORKING ON SIGNALS INSTALLATION AND REPLACEMENT.

WE DON'T HAVE THE DETECTION SYSTEM FOR THESE INTERSECTIONS YET.

WE EXPECT THEM TO BE DELIVERED BY THE END OF MAY.

DURING THE SUMMER THE CONTRACTOR IS GOING TO BE ALSO ADDING THE DETECTION SYSTEM.

THESE DETECTION SYSTEMS TAKE SOME TIME, SO BETWEEN 24-30 SOMETHING WEEKS TO ARRIVE AFTER WE HAVE ORDERED THEM.

WE EXPECT THEM TO HAVE THEM INSTALLED THIS SUMMER AND YOU WILL SEE A CHANGE IN HOW THE TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARE WORKING.

WE ALSO HAVE TWO OTHER PROJECTS IN THE AREA.

ONE IS ON STATE HIGHWAY 35 FROM FM 523 TO FM 2403, JUST SOUTH OF VALVING, WHICH WE'RE GOING TO BE WIDENING THE SHOULDERS AND WE'RE ALSO ADDING WHAT WE CALL A SUPER TOOL, WHICH IS THIS PASSING LANES.

IT WILL ALLOW EVERY TWO MILES AND OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A PASSING OPTIONS

[00:35:03]

FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE DRIVING A LITTLE BIT FASTER, HOPEFULLY WITHIN THE SPEED LIMIT.

BUT IS GOING TO ENHANCE THE CONDITIONS OF STATE HIGHWAY 35 IN THIS PORTION.

WE ARE ALSO HAVE A PROJECT THAT IS GOING TO BE STARTING ON MAY 8TH, IS GOING TO BE ON BUSINESS 288 FROM FM 523 TO FM 521.

WE'RE GOING TO BE WIDENING THE SHOULDERS AND BASE REPAIRS AND RESURFACE.

THAT PROJECT IT WILL ALSO INCLUDE A NEW INTERSECTION ON BUSINESS 288 AND BEECHWOOD.

IS STARTING IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS.

THOSE ARE PROJECTS THAT ARE COMING TO THIS AREA.

JUST A QUICK DESCRIPTION OF OTHER PROJECTS WE HAVE IN BRAZORIA COUNTY, WE HAVE STATE HIGHWAY 36.

THE WHOLE CORRIDOR IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION AND AT THIS TIME ALL THE WAY FROM FREE PORT TO FORT BEND COUNTY LINE AND FORT BEND CONTINUE BEYOND.

THIS IS A CORRIDOR AND WE ARE WAITING INTO TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION.

HIGHWAY IS ALSO ONE OF OUR HURRICANE EVACUATION ROUTES.

WE ALSO HAVE ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF OUR COUNTY BETWEEN MINDFUL AND IOWA COLONY.

THERE'S A LOT OF CONSTRUCTION HAPPENING.

WE'RE BUILDING ABOUT SEVEN OVER PAST SIX NEW OVERPASSES AND WIDENING AND EXISTING ONE THAT IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

YOU CAN SEE VESORIA KEEP GROWING.

THERE'S A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT COMING TO THE AREA.

YOU HAVE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT COMING TO THE CITY AND TEXAS IS WORKING TO CATCH UP WITH ALL THESE GROWTH AND HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE READY.

ANY QUESTIONS RELATED TO ANY OF THESE PROJECTS OR ANY OTHER TOPIC?

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING.

I WAS JUST SITTING HERE JUST THINKING, SITTING AT THIS DESK FOR MANY YEARS.

WE'VE SEEN YOU TWICE IN THE LAST 9-10 MONTHS VERSUS THE LAST 10-15 YEARS OF TEXTS, NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF COMING.

WE APPRECIATE YOU BEING HERE BECAUSE WE DO GET A LOT OF THE FIRST THROUGH THE WINDOW.

BASICALLY, THEY CONTACT US TO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE HIGHWAYS AND SO WE HEAR IT.

WE WON'T BE ABLE TO GIVE THEM GOOD INFORMATION AND ALSO BE AN AMBASSADOR FOR TECH STOCK BECAUSE WE KNOW Y'ALL ARE TRYING TO IMPROVE AND IT JUST IT'S A SLOW PROCESS WHEN YOU'RE BUILDING STREETS. I GET IT.

BUT ONCE AGAIN, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

I APPRECIATE THE EXPEDITE THE BEAN EXPEDITIOUS ON OUR IMPROVEMENTS TO THESE TWO BIG CORRIDORS THAT WE'VE HAD HERE IN TOWN.

BECAUSE THAT WAS WHEN YOU TOOK ON BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME, THERE WAS A LOT OF QUESTIONS CAME FROM US TO THE CITY AS CITIZENS TO US.

THE ROADS ARE BEING CONSUMED UP WITH CONSTRUCTION AND THANK GOD, I DID IT AT NIGHT SO THEY IMPACT WAS NOT AS BAD.

BUT THE BIG THING WE'RE STILL GETTING HIS COURSE, THE TIMING.

NOW YOU'VE GIVEN US A GREAT UPDATE AND HOPE THE RESIDENTS ARE LISTENING AND WE'LL TRY TO ALSO CONVEY THIS MESSAGE TO OUR RESIDENTS.

THEN THE STRIPING, I'VE SEEN IT DRIVING IN THE RAIN AND WE GO WITH LOAVES WITHOUT RAIN BUT WHEN WE GET THEM.

IT WAS DIFFICULT TO SEE SOME OF THAT STRIPING.

WE'RE GLAD YOU'RE GOING BACK AND PUTTING THAT REFLECTIVE GLITTER ON THERE TO MAKE IT A LITTLE MORE REFLECTIVE FOR US.

THEN THE OTHER THING IS, ONE OF THESE I'M SEEING I'M GETTING A QUESTION TO ASK IS, HOW LONG THE TWO PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE AT OUR COLONY, HOW LONG DO YOU'LL THINK IT'S GOING TO BE? BECAUSE A LOT OF OUR RESIDENTS GO THAT WAY TO AND FROM WORK AND OF COURSE, VISIT THE HOUSTON AREA AND THEN THE 35 PROJECT.

HOW LONG IS THAT GOING TO BE? IF YOU COULD JUST GIVE US A BALLPARK SO WE CAN AT LEAST CONVEY THAT MESSAGE AS WELL.

>> STATE HIGHWAY 35 FROM ANGLETON TO ALVIN IS GOING TO BE ABOUT A YEAR-AND-A-HALF.

THE PROJECTS ON 288, MANDIBLE AND IOWA COLONY IS FOR PROJECTS THAT WE HAVE THERE.

THE FIRST ONE SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF 2024, AND THEN THE OTHER THREE SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE END OF 2025.

JUST THE NORTHERN ONE, WHICH IS JUST NORTH OF HIGHWAY 6 IS GOING 288 IS GOING TO GO OVER A NEW INTERSECTION THAT'S GOING TO CONNECT RODEO PALM UNDER BELLA.

WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE BUILDING A CELL PHONE FRONTAGE ROAD THAT WILL CONNECT TO HIGHWAY 6.

RIGHT NOW WE'RE BUILDING THE FRONTAGE ROAD.

WE'RE GOING TO BE MOVING ALL THE TRAFFIC FROM THE MAIN LANES TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD SO WE CAN BUILD THE MAIN LANES.

WE'RE ALSO WORKING TOGETHER IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COUNTY BECAUSE EVENTUALLY THEY ARE PLANNING TO CONTINUE EXTENDING THEIR FACILITIES AND WE'RE WORKING TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN ALL SHARE THE SPACE.

SOUTH OF HIGHWAYS 6.

WE HAVE A COUNTY ROAD 48 NORTH OR IOWA COLONY BOULEVARD.

WE'RE GOING TO BE CREATING A NEW INTERSECTION 288 IS GOING TO GO OVER THE NEW IOWA COLONY BOULEVARD INTERSECTION.

THEN WE HAVE IT'S EITHER RAPID OR COUNTY ROAD 57

[00:40:01]

WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO OVER 288 MARIANA PARKWAY COUNTY ROAD 56.

WE'RE GOING TO BE WIDENING THAT BRIDGE TO TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION.

THE NEXT ROAD IT THEY'VE IMPORTANT.

COUNTY ROAD 64 BY THE NEW HIGH SCHOOL.

WE'RE GOING TO BE HAVING ANY OVERPASS.

SOUTH OF THAT ONE IS TO BUICK OR COUNTY ROAD 63.

IT'S ALSO GOING TO BE GOING OVER 288.

THEN AT COUNTY ROAD 288 IS GOING TO GO OVER THE NEW INTERSECTION IS GOING TO BE ANY INTERSECTION THAT COME TO ROAD 60.

>> WOW.

>> THAT WAS A LOT.

>> IT TURNS OUT, BUT IT'S GOING TO [INAUDIBLE] 25 IS GOING TO BE COMPLETED.

WE ARE PLANNING DURING PEAK HOURS TO CONTINUE WITH THE TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION.

BETWEEN 09:00 AM AND 03:00 PM WE MIGHT HAVE ONE LANE CLOSURES ON THE HIGHWAY, BUT DURING PEAK HOUR WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO HAVE TWO LANES IN EACH DIRECTION.

WE SHOULD REMAIN THE CAPACITY WE HAVE AT THIS TIME.

HOWEVER, IT IS AT WORK SO WHEN WE ARE ASKED EVERYBODY TO BE AWARE THAT WE HAVE FAMILY MEMBERS, WE HAVE COWORKERS, FRIENDS WORKING OUT THERE AND WE WANT EVERYBODY TO BE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE WORKERS UNTIL THE DRIVERS WHO ARE IN THE AREA.

>> WELL, THANK YOU FOR THOSE QUESTIONS BEING ANSWERED.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL, YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR TEX DOC?

>> YEAH. GO AHEAD, JOHN.

[NOISE]

>> I REACHED OUT TO CHRIS, WHEN WAS IT? THREE WEEKS AGO, FOUR WEEKS AGO ABOUT THIS.

THANK YOU MARIA FOR COMING TONIGHT.

IT'S DEFINITELY APPRECIATED BECAUSE I THINK THE BIGGEST COMPLAINT I HEAR THE MOST IS WHY IS THE LIGHTS MESSED UP ALONG THE 288 AND 35.

I CAN'T BELIEVE IT TAKES 24-36 WEEKS TO GET THOSE SIGNALS DETECTORS IN.

THAT'S HALF A YEAR ALMOST.

>> IT'S ABOUT WHAT? FOUR MONTHS OR THREE MONTHS.

>> TWENTY FOUR WEEKS.

>> FOUR MONTHS, 24 WEEKS.

HALF A YEAR ACTUALLY, [OVERLAPPING] YEAH. ABOUT SIX MONTHS.

>> THAT EXPLAINS A LOT BECAUSE I KNOW WE STARTED THIS PROJECT, AUGUST OF LAST YEAR MAYBE BEFORE THAT.

>> THAT THESE PROJECTS STARTED, YEAH PROBABLY ABOUT THAT TIME.

>> I WOULD SUGGEST IN THE FUTURE, JUST MY OPINION, PLEASE DON'T DO THEM BOTH AT THE SAME TIME EVER AGAIN.

IT CAUSES A LOT OF PROBLEMS ESPECIALLY AT THE MIDDLE OF TOWN WHERE YOU HAVE ONE STRIPE DOWN THE MIDDLE AND PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO JUMP IT LIKE THE DUKES OF HAZARD.

BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, I THINK THE BLINKING YELLOW LIGHT IS CAUSING A LOT OF CONCERN IN ANGLETON.

I'M ACTUALLY A FAN OF THE BLINKING YELLOW LIGHT.

I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE GOOD IN THE LONG RUN BUT SOME HEADS-UP IN THE FUTURE WHEN YOU'RE CHANGING SIGNALS LIKE THAT SO WE CAN START WORKING ON THE CITIZENRY EARLIER THEN JUST PUTTING THEM OUT THERE AND THEN SAYING, OKAY THERE ON.

I THINK THAT CAUGHT EVERYBODY BY SURPRISE.

THEN YOU CAN PUT IN YOUR EMAIL THAT YOU CAN HAVE THE CONTRACTOR COME BACK AND CHANGE THE TIMING OF THOSE LIGHTS.

RIGHT NOW, IT'S NOT CENSORED BUT IT'S ON A TIMER.

>> IT'S ON A TIMER.

>> CAN WE FIX THAT TURN SIGNAL ON A TIMER RIGHT NOW? IT'S CAUSING A LOT OF PROBLEMS.

>> 35 AND BUSINESS 288.

>> 35 AND LOOP 274.

>> LOOP 274.

>> IF YOU'RE TURNING FROM 35 GOING NORTH ON 274, OR IF YOU'RE GOING 35 GOING SOUTH ON 274, THOSE TWO LIGHTS RIGHT HERE ARE A MAJOR ISSUE.

CHIEF, HOW MANY ACCIDENTS HAVE WE HAD OVER THERE IN THE LAST MONTH?

>> THAT COULD BE EIGHT, I DON'T KNOW.

>> THE PEOPLE AT THE SEAFOOD RESTAURANT NEXT DOOR SAY THAT THERE'S A WRECK THERE ALMOST EVERY DAY, THEY SAID.

BUT I KNOW THAT'S PROBABLY NOT ACCURATE.

BUT I'M PRETTY SURE THERE HAS BEEN QUITE A FEW OF THEM OVER THERE.

WE TALK ABOUT SAFETY, WELL, I'D LIKE US TO TRY TO BE PROACTIVE ON THE SAFETY ON THAT SIDE.

WHO IS THE CONTRACTOR ON THIS PROJECT?

>> THE SIGNALS THAT YOUR TOKEN ARE HANDLED BY JAMES CONSTRUCTION IN STATE HIGHWAY 35.

THE OTHER CONTRACTOR IS DAVID GREEN.

>> OKAY. REALLY LIKE AS I SAID, TRY TO DO SOMETHING.

I KNOW THAT YOU'LL GET THOSE SIGNALS DETECTORS IN HOPEFULLY IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS.

BUT IN THE MEANTIME, I WOULD LIKE US TO SEE IF WE CAN CHANGE THOSE TIMERS FOR THE LEFT-HAND TURNS BECAUSE IT'S REALLY CAUSING A BIG PROBLEM.

IT'S ALSO PUSHING TRAFFIC INTO THE NEIGHBORHOODS BECAUSE THEY'RE TRYING TO AVOID THAT LIGHT.

IT'S PUSHING A LOT MORE PEOPLE INTO TJ WRIGHT, PARISH, COLOMBIA, THOSE STREETS, OR THEY'RE GOING AROUND TO TRY TO AVOID IT.

[00:45:05]

BUT I REALLY THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT BECAUSE IT'S REALLY BEEN AN ISSUE.

HOPEFULLY THE CITIZENS ARE LISTENING AND THEY FEEL THE QUESTIONS WERE ASKED.

>> YOU CAN ALWAYS CONTACT OUR OFFICE.

THE PHONE NUMBER IS 979-864-8500.

THE PUBLIC CAN CONTACT US AND WE CAN LOOK AT ANY CONCERNS THEY MAY HAVE, SO YEAH.

>> GREAT.

>> WE'RE GLAD TO BE HERE.

WE'RE GLAD TO WORK TOGETHER WITH THE CITY.

WE HAVE BEEN COORDINATING WITH THE CITY ON OTHER THINGS AND WE'RE GLAD TO BE HERE.

>> THANK YOU. AS A FELLOW PERSON WHO DRIVES 288 TWICE A WEEK, THAT ROAD, IT'S GETTING BAD IN THOSE CONSTRUCTION AREAS, ESPECIALLY WHERE THEY'VE DIVERTED THE TRAFFIC OFF ONTO THE SHOULDERS AND DOING THIS AND THERE'S HOLES AND JUST HOPEFULLY THEY'RE STAYING ON TOP OF THE ASPHALTENE.

>> YEAH.

>> I HAD IT ACTUALLY BROUGHT UP TO MY ATTENTION TODAY, MAYBE I MISUNDERSTOOD THE PERSON WHO WAS ASKING THIS QUESTION.

BUT THE INTERSECTION AT 35 OF VALDEZ, DIRECTLY MIDDLE OF DOWNTOWN.

I WAS JUST SEEING, DO WE HAVE ANY WALK SIGNALS THERE? PEOPLE THAT CROSS THAT INTERSECTION SPECIFICALLY, I THINK ON THE WEST SIDE.

>> I DON'T REMEMBER IF WE HAVE PEDESTRIAN SIGNALS THERE.

>> I THOUGHT THERE HAD BEEN AT ONE TIME AT [BACKGROUND] 35 THROUGH DOWNTOWN?

>> NOT VALDEZ, IT MUST BE YOU MEAN GLASGOW.

>> GLASGOW. I'M SORRY. [OVERLAPPING] DID I SAY VALDEZ? RIGHT HERE DOWNTOWN GLASGOW.

>> RIGHT HERE.

>> I'M SORRY. WHAT DID I SAY? VALDEZ? [OVERLAPPING] GLASGOW.

THANK YOU. YES, DOWNTOWN.

I'M SORRY, I THOUGHT THERE WAS JUST A LOT OF TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSING THERE. YOU KNOW WHAT I'M SAYING? YOU CAN ACTUALLY HIT THE SIGNAL TO GIVE YOU THE NOTICE AND ANYWAY.

THERE'S ONE ALREADY? OKAY, ALL RIGHT.

I'M SORRY. THAT WAS MY CONFUSION.

THEN I'LL JUST SAY THANK YOU.

I APPRECIATE EVERY TIME YOU COME.

I KNOW YOU'RE EXTREMELY BUSY.

I CAN IMAGINE ALL THE CITIES AND ALL THE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS AND ALL THE CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS YOU GO TO.

I'LL ALWAYS APPRECIATE YOUR TIME AND YOU DO TAKE NOTES AND I DO THINK YOU DO LISTEN TO US. I DO APPRECIATE IT.

I KNOW YOU'RE PROBABLY IN THE BIG TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BUDGET, WE ANGLETON ARE NOTHING BUT VERY TINY.

BUT HOPEFULLY YOU'VE ALWAYS SEEM TO ACT LIKE WE'RE IMPORTANT, SO I HOPE THAT'S TRUE.

I'M JUST SEEING IT THAT ONE. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> THANK YOU.

>> ANYBODY ELSE?

>> I KNOW IT'S STRESSFUL DEALING WITH SUPPLY CHAIN ISSUES.

WHEN YOU SWITCH OVER TO A DIFFERENT TYPE OF LIGHTING SYSTEM, SIGNAL SYSTEM, YOU DON'T GO DOWN TO WALMART AND GET THOSE, THE SPECIAL ORDER, SPECIAL MANUFACTURERS AND HAVE ALL THESE VARIOUS TOWNS AND INTERSECTIONS UP DOWN A HIGHWAY BEING INSTALLED, THEY TAKE A WHILE GETTING THEM.

I'M SORRY, PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT A YELLOW FLASHING LIGHT IS.

MAYBE THEY SHOULD GO BACK TO DRIVER'S ED OR SOMETHING, BUT [OVERLAPPING] A YELLOW LIGHT OF ANY SORT WITH A ROUND SOLID OR A YELLOW PLACING MEANS CAUTION.

[LAUGHTER] YOU SHOULD PROBABLY YIELD OF THAT GALAXY MOVING OVER THERE.

>> I'VE GOT THAT MAN, HURRY UP.

>> HURRY UP.

>> I REMEMBER, I THINK THE FLASHING YELLOW LIGHTS CAME AS A RECOMMENDATION FROM YOU.

>> FROM MY WIFE, YES MA'AM, [LAUGHTER] AND I'M GLAD YOU PUT IT IN.

>> WE LOOK INTO IT AND WE DID A STUDY AND IT WAS WARRANTED SO WE WERE ABLE TO INCLUDE THEM THERE. [LAUGHTER]

>> [OVERLAPPING] I LIKE IT. I UNDERSTAND.

I AGREE WITH MOST OF BOTH MR. BOOTH AND JOHN, WE SHOULD KNOW THE RULES OF THE ROAD IF WE'RE GOING TO OPERATE ON RULES OF THE ROAD.

I THINK LONG TERM IT WILL TAKE EFFECT AND PEOPLE WILL UNDERSTAND HOW IT WORKS AND WE'LL GET BETTER AT IT AS A GROUP AS A POPULACE.

I DON'T THINK EDUCATION IS ALWAYS IMPORTANT SO I AGREE WITH JOHN IN THAT RESPECT THAT, I DON'T KNOW HOW WE COULD REACH OUT TO OTHERS, WHETHER IT'S SOCIAL MEDIA POST, JUST A REMINDER, HEY, THESE ARE FLASHING LIGHTS.

I KNOW WE'VE DONE NOTICES IN THE WATER BILL BEFORE, THAT SORT OF THING.

BE ON ALERT, IF YOU'VE BEEN DOWNTOWN RECENT, YOU'LL SEE THESE YELLOW LIGHTS.

I DON'T KNOW, JUST CONCEPTS OF COMMUNICATION AND I THINK THAT'S ALWAYS IMPORTANT.

IT DOESN'T MATTER WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO OR IMPLEMENT IN THE CITY, WHEN WE COMMUNICATE, WE'RE USUALLY BETTER OFF.

[00:50:01]

>> THAT'S A REALLY GOOD POINT.

I WILL USE OUR PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICE ALSO.

THEY USE FACEBOOK, TWITTER, NEXTDOOR TO COMMUNICATE.

MAYBE WE CAN ADVERTISE EDUCATION ON WHAT THE YELLOW LIGHT AND CREATE AWARENESS THAT THEY ARE. WE'LL DO THAT.

>> [OVERLAPPING] TALK OF ANGLETON IS GOOD.

[LAUGHTER]

>> [OVERLAPPING] I WILL SINCERELY SAY THE FACTS THEY'RE ALWAYS GOOD FOR THESE TYPES OF STORIES, [OVERLAPPING] SOMETHING FOR THEM TO RECOVER.

>> THEY'RE ALWAYS LOOKING TO HAVE ARTICLES ON TEXTS THAT I LOOK FOR [LAUGHTER] [OVERLAPPING].

>> ANYWAY, JUST IDEAS. YES. I'M JUST TRYING TO GET COMMUNICATION.

>> CHRIS, I THINK THAT YOUR NEXT TIKTOK SUBJECT.

[LAUGHTER] ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MS. MARIA?

>> I APPRECIATE YOUR SAFETY MOMENT AT THE BEGINNING AND YOUR TIME COMING HERE AND GIVING US THE DETAILED INFORMATION THAT ARE ISSUES TO OUR RESIDENTS AND ALL OF THE DETAILS ON THE PROJECT ABOUT ARE SURROUNDING OUR CITY.

REALLY WE APPRECIATE YOU COMING HERE. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. I'M GLAD TO BE HERE.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU, MARIA.

>> THANK YOU. THAT MOVES ON TO ITEM NUMBER 10,

[10. Discussion and possible action on Ordinance No. 20230425-010 an ordinance altering the prima face speed limits established for vehicles under the provision of 545.356, Texas Transportation Code, upon the basis of an engineering and traffic investigation, upon certain streets and highways, of parts thereof, within the corporate limits of the City of Angleton, as set out in this ordinance; and providing a penalty of a fine not to exceed $200 for the violation of this ordinance.]

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 20230425-010 AND ORDINANCE ALTERING THE PRIME PERMA PHASE SPEED LIMITS ESTABLISHED FOR VEHICLES UNDER THE PROVISION OF 545.356 TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE UPON THE BASIS OF AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC INVESTIGATION UPON CERTAIN STREETS AND HIGHWAYS OF PARTS THEREOF WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON HAS SET OUT IN THE ORDINANCES AND PROVIDING A PENALTY OF A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $200 FOR THE VIOLATIONS OF THIS ORDINANCE. CHRIS.

>> IN YOUR PACKETS WE HAVE A MEMO REQUEST FROM TEXTON TO CHANGE THE SPEED.

FORTUNATELY, WE HAVE A GREAT SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT THERE, MARIA.

THEY CAN WALK US THROUGH THIS.

I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS THAT SHE RECOMMENDED THEY CAN DO, THE TECH STOCK AND PAY FOR IS A STUDY.

I WOULDN'T SEE THAT WE NECESSARILY APPROVE THIS UNLESS YOU WANT TO.

BUT WE CAN ASK FOR STUDY AND SEE WHAT THE STUDY SAYS AND COME BACK AND REVISIT THIS.

>> DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?

>> IS THE SPEED LIMIT NOT ALREADY 35?

>> IT IS.

>> IT'S 35 TO A GOOD PORTION OF THIS.

>> THIS IS SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE.

WE CAN DO A STUDY THAT DETERMINE WHAT WILL BE THE SPEED LIMIT, THAT IF IT NEEDS TO BE REDUCED OR INCREASED DEPENDING THAT WILL BE THE STUDY.

WE'LL SHARE WITH YOU THE STORY.

YOU DETERMINE IF THIS IS SOMETHING YOU WANT TO PROCEED.

WE'LL SHARE WITH THE DIVISION OF TRAFFIC SAFETY OPERATION.

THEY WILL REVIEW IF EVERYBODY'S IN AGREEMENT THAT THIS IS WHERE WE WANT TO GO.

WE CAN SHARE WITH THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION.

THEY WILL ISSUE AN ORDER AND THEN IT WILL COME BACK TO THE CITY FOR A CITY ORDINANCE.

WE CAN CHANGE THE SIZE AND MAINTAIN THEM, BUT IT'S UP TO THE CITY.

IT'S AN OPTION THAT WE HAVE.

IF YOU WANT TO, WE CAN GO THROUGH THIS PROCESS.

>> I WOULD LIKE THAT. I MEAN, I HEAR A LOT OF PEOPLE COMPLAIN THE MOST ABOUT, FROM THE WESTERN LIMIT BEFORE 28 DOWN TO SOMEWHERE BETWEEN SOUTH WALKER, NORTH WALKER, TJ WRIGHT AND THEY SAY THAT THE SPEED LIMIT USED TO BE 40 OR 45 AND GOT DROPPED DOWN TO 35 AND THEY BELIEVE IT'S STILL SHOULD BE 40.

I AM IN AGREEMENT THAT NO MORE THAN 35 TO THE MIDDLE OF TOWN FOR SURE, AT LEAST ALL THE WAY THROUGH TO DOWNING.

BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE STUDY BECAUSE I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE STILL COMPLAIN ABOUT THE 35 MILES AN HOUR THROUGH THERE.

BECAUSE OLD INCA ROAD COMING INTO TOWN AND STILL 45 COMING IN ALL THE WAY TO WILKINS.

>> I LIKE THAT IDEA TOO.

I'D LIKE TO EXPLORE BECAUSE MY NATURAL INSTINCT IS TO DRIVE A LITTLE FASTER. LET'S BE HONEST.

>> MAYBE WE CAN TABLE THIS UNTIL TEXAS HAS A STUDY COMPLETE AND WHEN THEY LET US KNOW THAT WE CAN PUT IT BACK ON THE AGENDA.

>> REQUEST FOR A STUDY.

YOU WANT THEM ON BOTH OUR ROADWAY 35 ON BUSINESS 288 OR JUST 35? [OVERLAPPING]

>> I THINK 288'S FINE, HONESTLY BUT.

[00:55:01]

>> [OVERLAPPING] FROM 523 -288.

>> YES, MA'AM.

>> WELL, JUST WEST OF 288.

BECAUSE OF THE BAILEY'S PRAIRIE WHERE THE BRIDGES, THAT'S WHEN IT REDUCES TO 45, I THINK FROM 60. IS THAT RIGHT?

>> YEAP. [OVERLAPPING].

>>SHE WAS JUST TALKING ABOUT BUSINESS 288.

>> NO. THIRTY-FIVE FROM 523 AND THEN YOU WANT TO GO BEYOND 288 [OVERLAPPING] JUST AFTER THE BULKISS.

>> BELK ROAD.

>> BELK ROAD.

>> LA QUINTA.

>> LA QUINTA.

>> YEAH. I THINK IT IS COUNTY ROAD 28.

>> YES, IT IS.

>> IT IS.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WELL, DO THAT. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. [OVERLAPPING]

>> THANK YOU.

>> APPRECIATE IT.

>> MS. JUDY, JUST SAY WE'RE GOING TO JUST GO TO TABLE OUT NUMBER 10 FOR A FUTURE DATE.

MOVING RIGHT ALONG ITEM NUMBER 11,

[11. Presentations by CSRS, Grant Works and HCH Enterprises on the Grant Writing and Administration Services Request for Proposal (RFP).]

PRESENTATIONS BY CSRS GRANTWORKS AND HCH ENTERPRISES ON THE GRANT WRITING AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL, CHRIS.

>> WE LOST OUR FULL-TIME GRANT ADMINISTRATOR IN DECEMBER.

WE'VE GOT PENDING TECH STOCK GRANTS, SO WE NEED TO SUBMIT BY JUNE 5TH.

WE'VE GOT A BUNCH OF OTHER GRANTS LIKE CDBG THAT'S PROBABLY COMING UP THAT WE GET FROM THE COUNTY.

WE'VE GOT A SLEW OF OTHER THINGS THAT WE NEED, GRANT ASSISTANCE.

WE PROCURED THROUGH AN RFQ.

WE HAD A TEAM THAT SCORED THEM LIKE WE NORMALLY DO.

YOU'VE GOT RECOMMENDATIONS, YOU'RE IN PACKET.

WHAT WE DO, WE'VE DONE BEFORE.

WE GIVE EACH GROUP 10 MINUTES TO PRESENT AND THEN YOU CAN ASK THEM QUESTIONS AT THE END OF THE PRESENTATION.

THE NEXT ITEM IS TO AWARD ONE OF THE FIRMS TO BE OUR GRANT ADMINISTRATOR.

JUST LIKE WE'VE DONE BEFORE, SO IT'S ONE ITEM RIGHT NOW.

JUST PRESENTATIONS, LISTEN, ASK QUESTIONS.

OBVIOUSLY, YOU CAN ASK QUESTIONS LATER AT THE SELECTION TIME.

BUT WE'RE UNDER THE GUN TO SELECT SOMEONE WHO WILL HAVE TO IMMEDIATELY WORK TO TECH STOCK GRANTS TO MEET THE JUNE 5TH DEADLINE.

THAT WAS ONE OF THE QUESTIONS WE ASKED THEM TO ADDRESS, WHETHER THEY HAVE THAT CAPABILITY.

THAT'S PROBABLY THE ONLY DIFFERENCE IN PRESENTATIONS FROM WHAT WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST.

>> WHO'S GOING TO BE THE TIMEKEEPER SO WE MAKE SURE WE KEEP ON TIME? MICHELLE? YOU WILL BE OUR TIMEKEEPER.

WE'LL GO AHEAD AND LET THE CSRS, PODIUM IS YOURS, SIR.

YOU'LL JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND THEN ROCK ON.

>> MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THANK YOU.

I GUESS I'M ON THE CLOCK NOW.

MY NAME IS DONALD BRINKMAN, PRINCIPAL AND SOUTH REGIONAL DIRECTOR FOR CSRS.

THAT FIRST SLIDE MEANS NOTHING.

LET'S SEE. HERE WE GO.

THIS IS SOME OF THE MEAT AND POTATOES WHERE A 45-YEAR-OLD FIRM HEADQUARTERED IN BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA WITH OFFICES IN HOUSTON AND DALLAS.

WE HAVE $13 BILLION-PLUS OF EXPERIENCE IN FEDERAL AND STATE FUNDS THAT INCLUDES GRANT WRITING AND GRANT ADMINISTRATION.

ONE OF THE THINGS I'D LIKE TO POINT ON THIS SLIDE AND TRY TO BE BRIEF IS TURNKEY APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? THAT MEANS THAT OUR FIRM HAS THE CAPACITY TO DO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING BECAUSE WE HAVE ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS ON STAFF, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS.

WE CAN DO THE NEPA COMPLIANCE.

WE HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL TEAM, SO WE CAN DO PRE-NEPA, WE CALL IT DESKTOP ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE.

WE CAN CONVERT THAT TO A FULL NEPA CLEARANCE DETERMINATION WITH GRANTING FEDERAL AGENCY GIVES YOU AN AWARD.

THE OTHER THING IS BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS.

A LOT OF THE FEDERAL FUNDS COMING THROUGH A LOT OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS SUCH AS ARISE GRANT, BRIC, WHICH STANDS FOR BUILDING RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNITIES, REQUIRES A BCA.

SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO GO TO A SPECIAL ACCOUNTING FIRM.

WE HAVE THAT CAPACITY IN-HOUSE.

SEE WHAT ELSE HERE? AND THEN STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCY ENGAGEMENT WE'RE VERY INVOLVED WITH THE STATE AND FEDERAL AGENCIES WHO AWARD GRANTS AND HAVE LINES OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM.

I GUESS THE BIG THING IS ACTUALLY GOING ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP IS A PROJECT SCOPING.

IS SCOPING A PROJECT CORRECTLY SO THAT IT CAN BE COMPETITIVE IN A FEDERAL GRANT AWARD.

ONE OF THE THINGS I FORGOT TO MENTION ON THE PREVIOUS SLIDE,

[01:00:03]

OUR PROPOSAL ACTUALLY INCLUDED A SUBCONTRACTOR WITH HUB DBE PARTICIPATION.

[INAUDIBLE] IS A FIRM THAT WE HAVE A CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH, THEY WERE INCLUDED IN OUR PROPOSAL.

JUST TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS.

ON THIS SLIDE, WE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE A THREE-PRONG APPROACH, SO THERE'S GRANT PLANNING, WHICH IS VERY CRITICAL.

ALIGN YOUR PRIORITIES WITH THE PRIORITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES AHEAD OF YOU, WHETHER THEY BE STATE, FEDERAL, OR LOCAL.

ONCE YOU DO THAT, THEN IT'S A LOT EASIER TO DEVELOP AN APPLICATION I HAVEN'T PLANNED FOR ONE.

YOU COULD SEE JUMPING AROUND A LITTLE BIT COMPETITIVE APPLICATIONS.

THESE ARE BIG. FRA IS FEDERAL RAIL ADMINISTRATION.

I THINK THAT ONE'S STILL PENDING.

PORT OF PALACIOS, THAT WAS LAST YEAR, THEY'VE GOT AWARDED $10 MILLION TO A MARITIME ADMINISTRATION GRANT WHICH FUNNELS UP THEIR USDOT.

FEMALE BRICK, I HAD MENTIONED THAT AND FMA IS FLOOD MITIGATION, LSU LAKES, THAT'S IN BATON ROUGE JUST AS A PRETTY ICONIC PROJECT IN LOUISIANA BECAUSE IF YOU GO ALONG, I TEND THROUGH BATON ROUGE, YOU'LL SEE THE LSU LAKES OR UNIVERSITY OF LAKES THEY'RE CALLED, AND THOSE GOT A BRICK AWARD FOR $20 MILLION TO REDO THOSE.

I THINK THE USDOT RECONNECTED COMMUNITIES IS STILL PENDING.

THOSE ARE SOME OF THE BIGGER APPLICATIONS GETTING A LITTLE BIT CLOSE, LIKE I SAID, PALACIOS.

WE DID THAT WHEN PORT VICTORIA, THEY GOT AN EDA, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION GRANT FOR THREE MILLION DOLLARS ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO.

WE'RE WRITING ONE OF THOSE FOR THE CITY OF YOAKUM RIGHT NOW, AND WE DID ONE LAST YEAR FOR THE CITY OF CUERO.

GRANTS MANAGEMENT, ONCE YOU ACTUALLY GET AN AWARD THAT TRANSITIONS TO THE MANAGEMENT, MAKE SURE YOU'RE FEDERALLY COMPLIANT ON THOSE GRANTS, SO THAT'S JUST A LITTLE SAMPLE.

CDBG, CHRIS MENTIONED THAT WE'RE DOING THAT INCLUDE ALSO TAKING CARE OF TECH STOCK TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES GRANT FOR CLUED.

FEMA PUBLIC ASSISTANCE THAT'S WHERE WE CUT OUR TEETH WAY BACK WHEN AFTER HURRICANE KATRINA, WE'VE GOTTEN INTO FEMA PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, AND SO IRONICALLY, WE'RE STILL WORKING ON KATRINA WORK IN NEW ORLEANS.

I THINK WE'RE DOING THE LAST SCHOOL RIGHT NOW.

STATE OF LOUISIANA, THE E WRAP RIGHT THERE AS A RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.

I THINK THAT'S HUD OR COVID FUNDED CITY OF LOS ANGELES ARPA, SO THAT JUST GIVES YOU THE DEPTH AND BREADTH OF ALL OF THE GRANT PROGRAMS WE'RE FAMILIAR WITH, CAN WRITE APPLICATION OR MANAGE THOSE GRANTS.

HOW AM I DOING ON TIME? I FEEL LIKE I'M RUSHED. OH, JESUS.

LET'S JUST CAMP OUT HERE FOR FIVE-MINUTES AND THIS [LAUGHTER] IS SO IMPORTANT.

YES. I DON'T THINK ANYBODY'S GOING TO SAY NO, BUT YES, WE CAN DO YOUR TEXT.TA GRANT APPLICATION.

WE ARE ACTIVELY DOING LET'S SEE.

I MENTIONED CLUTE, CITY OF EDNA.

WE'RE GOING TO BE HANDLING THAT ONE.

PORT MANSFIELD TEXT.TA GRANTS, SO WE'RE VERY FAMILIAR.

WE'VE SEEN THE APPLICATIONS AND READY TO PULL THE TRIGGER, SO I WOULD EVEN SAY APPALLING YOUR ACTION TONIGHT, WE WILL GET STARTED AND WE DON'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR A CONTRACT, SO IT LOOKS LIKE ABOUT FIVE MINUTES TO JUST TALK. ANY QUESTIONS.

>> WE CAN ASK QUESTIONS. THANK YOU SO MUCH, SO I DID SEE THE LSU ITEM, DROVE IU10 A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, SO I DID SEE THAT ONE THERE.

THE CLUTE ITEM THERE THAT YOU HAVE THERE, SO NOW YOU'VE TRANSITIONED, SO WHAT ARE YOU DOING FOR THEM NOW JUST TO RECAP?

>> WE'RE MANAGING THEIR CDBG PROGRAM, THE MIT PROGRAM THROUGH GLO, SO WE WROTE THOSE TWO GRANTS AND I WILL SAY IT'S NOT A COMPETITIVE GRANT.

YOU JUST GOT TO CHECK THE BOX AND YOU GET THE MONEY.

I'M SURE Y'ALL FAMILIAR WITH THAT, SO WE MET THE CRITERIA AND THEY GOT $10 MILLION.

WE'RE MANAGING THAT WE HAVE ALREADY SUBMITTED THE SECOND ROUND, THE CDBG-MIT FOR THEM.

I THINK THEY ONLY GOT A MILLION BUCKS IN THE SECOND ROUND, AND SO WE'RE WAITING FOR GLO TO APPROVE THAT, AND THEN WE'RE WRITING A TEXT.TA GRANT FOR THEM.

>> IS THIS YOUR FIRST PROJECT WITH CLUTE OR HAVE YOU DONE OTHERS FOR THEM?

>> THE CDBG PROJECT IS THE FIRST.

>> IT'S THE FIRST. THANK YOU.

ANYBODY ELSE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR MR. DONALD?

>> I'LL JUST MAKE A COMMENT, SO WHATEVER WE HIRE WILL COVER 95 PERCENT OF OUR GRANT APPLICATIONS AND HELP US FIND GRANTS AND ALL THAT.

THERE WERE A COUPLE, I THINK LIKE CDBG THEY HAVE TO BE PROCURED BY THEMSELVES,

[01:05:06]

SO FOR [NOISE] CDBG, FOR EXAMPLE WE'D HAVE TO GO BACK OUT AND READ PROCURE FOR GRANT ADMINISTRATION EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE A GRANT ADMINISTRATOR PARTY PROCURED, WITH FEDERAL GRANTS THAT'S REQUIREMENT.

[NOISE] JUST PLANTING THAT SEED SO THAT WHEN WE COME BACK IN X NUMBER OF MONTHS WE SAY WE HAVE CDBG GRANT, [INAUDIBLE] YOU'RE LIKE CHRIS, I THOUGHT WE DID THAT.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CSRS?

>> I SEE THE EXAMPLES, BUT CAN YOU GIVE ME A LITTLE BIT OF COLOR AROUND THEM.

I GUESS, THE TYPES OF GRANTS YOU RECEIVED FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, ROAD CONSTRUCTION THAT BREAK DOWN.

>> SURE. LAW ENFORCEMENT, ACTUALLY USED TO MANAGE A POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, THE BULLETPROOF VEST PROGRAM, THAT'S PRETTY EASY.

YOU JUST APPLY AND ALL THAT DEPENDING ON WHAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR CITY, AGAIN, YOUR PRIORITIES, SO FEMA HAS TRANSIT SAFETY PROGRAM, PORT SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM, SO NOT JUST PORTS, BUT LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WITH A MARITIME PRESENCE CAN APPLY FOR THOSE GRANTS.

ACTUALLY, WRITING TWO OF THOSE RIGHT NOW, ONE FOR THE PORT OF HARLINGEN AND THE OTHER FOR THE PORT OF VICTORIA AND MANAGING ONE FOR THE PORT OF VICTORIA.

IT'S THE LIMIT BECAUSE USUALLY THEIR FORMULA, I'VE GOT X AMOUNT OF POLICE OFFICERS AND I WOULD JUST SAY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS PROBABLY THE MOST LOGICAL PLACE TO GET ONE OF THOSE AND A LOT OF THOSE FUNDS ARE FUNNELED DOWN TO THE STATE LEVEL.

>> I WAS ASKING MORE OF A BREAKDOWN THERE.

>> YEAH, I'M GETTING THERE.

[LAUGHTER] TRYING TO THINK, THE CITY OF YOAKUM ACTIVELY DOING THEIR GRANT RIGHT NOW.

WE'RE TO REQUEST THREE MILLION DOLLARS FOR SEWER EXPANSION TO SUPPORT INDUSTRIAL PARK, AND SO THEY HAVE A TENANT IN THE EDA GRANT.

IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT YOU HAVE JOBS, YOU CAN SHOW JOBS AND PRIVATE INVESTMENT, AND THEY'VE GOT A PRIVATE COMPANY DOING THAT, SO THEY HAVE THE I'LL CALL IT THE HOOK, THE HOOK TO GET THE GRANT.

YOU JUST GOT TO FORMULATE THAT TO BE COMPETITIVE.

PORT OF PALACIOS IS A $10 MILLION BULKHEAD GRANT, SO REPLACING A BULKHEAD FOR ALL COMMERCIAL FISHERMEN.

THE PALACIOS SHIPYARD WROTE A GRANT, WE'RE WAITING ON THAT ONE TO REDO THE DRY DOCK, REPLACE THE STEEL.

TRYING TO THINK WHAT'S ANOTHER FORMULA OR ANOTHER TYPE OF GRANT.

EDA, WE'VE DONE SOME ROADS.

THOSE ARE HARD TO COME BY.

WE ARE WAITING FOR RULES ON ALL THE WATER AND SEWER MONEY THAT'S COMING FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THE RULE MAKING, SO THOSE ARE GOING TO BE AVAILABLE.

BUT YEAH, I HOPE THAT GIVES A LITTLE BIT OF FLAVOR.

>> SURE.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> ANYTHING ELSE? THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. DONALD.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE NEXT ONE.

>> THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> NEXT WILL BE GRANTWORKS.

[NOISE]

>> GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL.

I'M ASHTON CROWE THE CLIENT SERVICES MANAGER FOR HGAC.

I'M GOING TO BEGIN BY GOING INTO THE BACKGROUND OF GRANTWORKS.

GRANTWORKS WAS FOUNDED IN 1979 AND THE HTAC AREA BY BRUCE BRITS SINGLE.

FORTY-FOUR YEARS LATER, WE NOW HAVE 400 PLUS EMPLOYEES.

WE LIKE TO REFER TO OUR STAFF AS A ARMY OF PROFESSIONALS BECAUSE MANY OF THEM HAVE RETIRED FROM FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES, SUCH AS THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD, TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE, AND FEMA.

GRANTWORKS IS TEXAS FOREMOST APPLICATION AND GRANT MANAGEMENT PROVIDER

[01:10:03]

WITH A HISTORY OF SECURING AND ADMINISTERING OVER $8 BILLION, ASSISTING HUNDREDS OF LOCALITIES AND THOUSANDS OF GRANT CONTRACTS.

WE ALSO HAVE A PREVIOUS AND CURRENT HISTORY WITH THE CITY OF ANGLETON SECURING OVER $5.6 MILLION IN GRANT FUNDING.

SORRY, I HAVEN'T USED THIS BEFORE.

THIS BUTTON. TIME'S THE CHARM.

AREAS OF EXPERTISE, GRANTWORKS HAS EXPERTS IN SEVERAL DIFFERENT FIELDS, INCLUDING INFRASTRUCTURE, HOUSING, COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, TRANSPORTATION, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES, DISASTER RECOVERY, PLANNING, MITIGATION, RESILIENCY, BROADBAND AND COAST RESILIENCY.

TO NAME A FEW OF THE EXPERTS THAT WE HAVE ON STAFF ARE WENDY KIRBY.

SHE'S THE VICE PRESIDENT OF OUR FEMA DEPARTMENT.

WENDY HAS OVER 20 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN HAZARD MITIGATION, AND SHE CAME TO US AFTER A SUCCESSFUL CAREER AT THE TEXAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.

ALSO IN THE HAZARD MITIGATION FIELD IS SUNNY CANCHECK, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF FEMA SERVICES WITH OVER 14 YEARS IN THE FIELD.

SUNNY CAME TO GRANTWORKS AFTER A CAREER WITH FEMA.

JOHN ZAIKEN, HE'S IN OUR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT.

HE IS ONE OF ONLY 1,100 PEOPLE WORLDWIDE TO OBTAIN THE DISTINGUISHED CERTIFIED ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION.

TRUST DAVIS SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF HOUSING PROGRAMS, CAME TO GRANTWORKS FROM THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS.

WE'RE ALSO PROUD TO HAVE RECENTLY HIRED THREE OF TDA SENIOR FIELD STAFF PERSONNEL TO WORK IN OUR CLIENT SERVICES DIVISION.

OUR GRANT PROGRAM PROFICIENCIES INCLUDE THE LIST ABOVE, AND WE HAVE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS AND ALL THE DIVERSE AREAS LISTED.

LASTLY, OUR HDAC EXPERIENCE, WE HAVE OVER 70 ACTIVE CLIENTS IN THE HDAC AREA AND THE ONES LISTED HERE ARE THE PROGRAMS THAT WE HAVE WORKED ON IN THE PAST FIVE YEARS.

>> HELLO, COUNCIL AND MAYOR AND CITIZENS.

THANK YOU FOR HAVING US TONIGHT.

I'M KELLE ODOM WITH GRANTWORKS.

I'VE BEEN WITH GRANTWORKS FOR ABOUT 10 YEARS NOW.

MY BACKGROUND WAS THAT THE STATE AS WELL, THE STATE OF TEXAS, I CAME FROM THE CDBG PROGRAM AND ALSO SPENT TIME AT THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE WAY BACK IN THE DAY WHEN GARY MARSHALL WAS LAND COMMISSIONER.

WHEN I CAME 10 YEARS AGO, GRANTWORKS HAD ABOUT 60 EMPLOYEES AND WE'VE HAD EXPLOSIVE GROWTH.

NOW HAVE ABOUT THAT 400 EMPLOYEES.

BUT I'M PROUD TO BE A PART OF A TEAM THAT'S SO INVOLVED WITH SO MANY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, AND WE'RE PROUD NOT TO JUST DO GRANTS WITH YOU.

WE WANT TO INVEST IN YOUR TOWN AS WELL.

WE WANT TO SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL EVENTS, WE WANT TO SUPPORT YOUR FOOD BANKS.

IF THERE'S MEDICAL DEBT TO BE PAID OFF.

IF YOU NEED SPONSORS FOR TML AND TEXAS CITY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION.

GRANTWORKS WANTS TO BE A PART OF THAT.

AS YOU CAN SEE UP HERE, WE'VE HAD SO MUCH EXPERIENCE OVER THE LAST 44 YEARS WITH ALL OF THESE AGENCIES, STATE AND FEDERAL, MANAGING ALL OF THESE PROJECTS OVER THE LAST FIVE YEARS.

THERE'S NUMEROUS NEWS EXPERIENCE.

THE STATE DIRECTOR OF THE CDBG PROGRAM, AURORIA CARDINEZ THE TEXAS CDBG PROGRAM IS THE LARGEST IN THE NATION AND SHE WAS THE STATE DIRECTOR.

SHE NOW WORKS FOR GRANTWORKS.

SHE LED NOT ONLY THE REGULAR PROGRAM, BUT ALSO THE DISASTER RECOVERY PROGRAM, AND WE'RE PROUD TO HAVE HER AS PART OF OUR STAFF AS WELL.

I'M IN [INAUDIBLE] BUT I SPENT ABOUT SIX YEARS DOWN HERE IN THIS REGION FOR GRANTWORKS WHEN I LIVED IN GALVESTON AND ASHTON IS IN PALACIOS, SO SHE'S PRETTY CLOSE BY TOO.

WE'VE GOT NUMEROUS FIELD OFFICES ALL ACROSS THE STATE, AND IN SEVERAL OTHER STATES.

WE'RE LICENSED NOW IN 10 OTHER STATES TO WORK.

BUT WE'VE GOT A LOT OF LOCAL PEOPLE HERE AS WELL.

GRANTWORKS GO IS TO KEEP YOU IN COMPLIANCE EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

WE'RE GOING TO WALK YOU THROUGH, START TO FINISH.

[01:15:02]

WE'RE GOING TO HELP YOU DEVELOP THE VERY BEST APPLICATION THAT YOU CAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH YOUR CITY MANAGER AND YOUR CHOSEN ENGINEER TO GET YOU THE MOST POINTS FOR THE APPLICATIONS AS POSSIBLE.

THEN WE'RE GOING TO KEEP YOU IN COMPLIANCE EVERY STEP OF THE WAY.

WHETHER IT'S WITH BIDDING AND PROCUREMENT, WHETHER IT'S WITH ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE.

DAVID'S SPOKE OF LABOR STANDARDS.

WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WHEN YOU GET TO THE END OF THE GRANT, YOU'RE IN COMPLIANCE WITH NO FEAR OF PAYBACK, AND YOU'RE ELIGIBLE TO APPLY OVER AND OVER AGAIN.

WE HAVE A PROVEN TRACK RECORD OF DOING THAT.

>> GO AHEAD.

>> OUR CAPACITY TO MEET DEADLINES.

CERTAINLY WE'VE GOT 20 FULL-TIME GRANT WRITERS AND A 74% WIN RATE AND CLIMBING OF SUCCESSFUL APPLICATIONS.

THE CTF PROGRAM, LIKE IT SHOWS UP THERE.

THE 2020 PART OF THAT 400 INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS WITH 36 CLIENTS, $83 MILLION.

IN 2014, WE DID 36 CLIENTS AND $70.7 MILLION.

THE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVE SET ASIDES.

WE'RE CURRENTLY WORKING WITH THREE CITIES, RIGHT HERE IN HDAC, BAY CITY SWEENEY, AND HEMPSTEAD AND THEN HAMILTON IS IN THE CENTRAL TEXAS COG REGION.

THE OTHER ONES LISTED THOUGH ARE SOME OF THE OLDER PROGRAMS, BUT LOTS OF EXPERIENCE IN ALL OF THESE AREAS.

I KNOW WE HAVE A TRACK RECORD OF WORKING WITH THIS CITY AND YOU-ALL HAVE USED, I THINK LANGFORD COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

CHRIS, I THINK HAD A RELATIONSHIP WITH THEN GOING BACK TO ROCKDALE, MAYBE.

I WORKED FOR LANGFORD MYSELF.

AFTER I LEFT THE STATE, I WORKED THERE FOR THREE YEARS BEFORE COMING TO GRANTWORKS FOR THE LAST 10.

I KNOW YOU'VE GOT LOTS OF CHOICES OUT THERE.

WE ARE PROUD TO HAVE STOLEN MARGARET HARDWAY FROM LANGFORD.

SHE WAS WITH THEM FOR, I DON'T KNOW, DECADES.

SHE RECENTLY CAME OVER TO GRANTWORKS.

WE GOT HER LAST FALL.

BRUCE STARTED THE COMPANY IN THIS AREA.

HE WORKED FOR CITY GOVERNMENT HIMSELF.

I THINK HE STARTED AROUND PASADENA, TEXAS CITY, THE PORT AREA.

HE STILL LIVES IN SUGARLAND.

HE'S STILL A VERY ACTIVE PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY.

EVERY DAY, WE HEAR FROM BRUCE, MAYBE SOMETIMES TOO MUCH.

BUT THANK YOU FOR INVITING US.

WE'RE HAPPY TO BE HERE AND WE'D LOVE TO WORK WITH YOU AND BE YOUR GRANT ADMINISTRATOR, SO WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

>> THANK YOU MS. KELLE. COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS FOR GRANTWORKS?

>> YES, I GOT ONE.

>> OKAY, CHRIS.

>> WE GET THE TECH STOCK GRANT, JUNE 5TH, DEADLINE.

ARE YOU ABLE TO MEET THAT DEADLINE?

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> OKAY.

>> ALL RIGHT.

>> GRANT WRITERS ARE READY TO HELP YOU.

LIKE ASHLEY SAID, THERE IS AN ARMY OR PROFESSORS.

>> MICROPHONE, PLEASE?

>> SORRY. I'M STRAINING HERE.

>> WHAT ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES, INFRASTRUCTURE, EQUIPMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS?

>> YES. WE HAVE A FAMOUS SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND LIKE ASHTON SAID, SANDY CAME FROM FEMA.

HE'S A SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT OF THAT PROGRAM.

WILLY KIRBY CAME FROM TEXAS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT.

THEY HAVE A FULL DEPARTMENT AND GRANTWORKS WERE VERY SPECIALIZED.

WE'VE GOT APP RIDERS WHO DON'T MANAGE PROJECTS.

WE'VE GOT PROJECT MANAGERS THAT DON'T HAVE TO GET OVER HERE AND WRITE APPLICATIONS.

WE'VE GOT A CLIENT SERVICES TEAM THAT RUNS AROUND AND KEEPS CLIENTS HAPPY.

IT LOOKS FOR NEW CLIENTS.

IT'S VERY STRUCTURED.

THESE PEOPLE DO NOTHING BUT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS.

THESE PEOPLE DO NOTHING BUT THEY'RE JUST BREAKING LABOR COMPLIANCE.

IT'S VERY SPECIALIZED AND EXPERTS IN EACH OF THOSE DEPARTMENTS.

>> THANK YOU.

>> HAVING COMING FROM THE STATE, FEDERAL PROGRAMS. MYSELF WILL KNOW WHAT THOSE APPLICATIONS ARE SUPPOSED TO LOOK LIKE BECAUSE WE USED TO RECEIVE THEM AND SCORE THEM.

NOW I'M JUST ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE TABLE AND A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO LIKE GRANTWORKS ARE VERY MUCH THE SAME.

>> THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> I'M JUST TRYING TO RECALL WHAT DID YOU-ALL DO FOR US? CHRIS, AS YOU MIGHT RECALL.

>> WHEN I GOT HERE THE SEWER PROJECT IN A COUPLE OF MANHOLES AND THEN REHAB OF SOME ROADS.

>> GOT YOU.

>> IT LOOKS LIKE OVER IN THE PAST, WE'RE GOING BACK TOWARDS 1994 THOSE MEAN MANY FEMA PROJECTS, MAINLY INFRASTRUCTURE, WATER, SEWER, THERE'S BEEN SEVERAL CDBG PROJECTS AND THERE WAS A DOWNTOWN REVITALIZATION PROJECTS.

WE BROUGHT OUR PRINTOUT FROM A LOT OF SEWERS, PUBLIC ASSISTANCE.

[01:20:09]

THAT PART WAS 13 GRANTS FOR 5.6 MILLION WITH THE CITY.

>> THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? QUESTIONS. I'M SURE THERE SOME MAY POP UP AT THE NEXT ITEM BUT IF NOT.

THANK YOU, MISS ASHTON AND MS. KELLE, THANK YOU-ALL SO MUCH.

>> THANK YOU.

>> MOVING RIGHT ALONG, WE NOW HAVE HCAH ENTERPRISES.

>> THEY'RE GOING TO B BY ZOOM.

>> OH, ZOOM.

>> HELLO. HOW ARE YOU?

>> HELLO, WELCOME.

>> I'M ROB ZARNETSKE, VICE PRESIDENT OF PUBLIC CONSULTING HERE AT HCAH ENTERPRISES.

I GUESS I WILL BE SHARING MY SCREEN IF I HAVE PERMISSION TO DO SO.

>> YEAH.

>> HCAH ENTERPRISES IS A RHODE ISLAND BASED COMPANY.

WE'VE BEEN AROUND SINCE 1986.

THE COMPANY ACTUALLY STARTED AS AN IT SERVICES COMPANY AND HAS BEEN IN THE GRANT ADMINISTRATION GAME IN RHODE ISLAND FOR ABOUT THE LAST 15 YEARS.

SINCE THE PANDEMIC, WE HAVE REALLY BEEN PUSHING A LITTLE BIT HARDER INTO THIS GRANT WRITING SPACE AND WHAT YOU'RE SEEING IN THIS APPLICATION IS OUR FORAY INTO THAT SPACE.

SINCE THE PANDEMIC, HCAH HAS BEEN WORKING WITH MUNICIPALITIES, MANAGING THEIR RPA FUNDS IN PARTICULAR.

BUT WE HAVE A VERY DEEP BENCH.

OUR TEAM INCLUDES A NUMBER OF ENGINEERS, IT INCLUDES A NUMBER OF PROGRAM MANAGERS WITH EXPERTISE AND EXPERIENCE IN MANAGING FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS, INCLUDING CDBG PROGRAMS INCLUDING HCAHS PROGRAMS, INCLUDING USDOT PROGRAMS. WE HAVE RECENTLY SUBMITTED AN APPLICATION TO TEXAS DOT FOR THE CITY OF WOODWAY, TEXAS.

WE HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH TEXAS DOT RECENTLY AS WELL.

BUT YOU'LL NOTE IN THE SCORING SHEETS HCAH SCORED THIRD OUT OF THE THREE HERE TONIGHT AND FOR GOOD REASON, WE ARE NEW TO THE GRANT WRITING PORTION OF THIS BUSINESS.

IT'S A HUGE GROWTH PERIOD IN US GRANT HISTORY.

THE HISTORY OF US GRANTS HAS BEEN IN DECLINE SINCE THE 1980S AND THE PANDEMIC AND THE FUNDING THAT CAME THROUGH THE INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT AND JOBS ACT AND THE INFLATION REDUCTION ACT AND RPA HAVE REALLY CREATED A GOLDEN ERA FOR FEDERAL GRANT PROGRAMS. WE'VE HEARD ONE COMMENT TONIGHT THAT FOLKS ARE SEEING EXPLOSIVE GROWTH AND WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO AT HCAH IS MOVE OUR FOLKS WHO'VE BEEN WORKING ON GRANT ADMINISTRATION INTO THE GRANT, WRITING A PIECE OF THINGS WE'RE VERY STRONG ON THE ADMINISTRATION.

I MYSELF AM A FORMER FEDERAL GRANT ADMINISTRATOR AND A FORMER CITY ADMINISTRATOR.

I RAN CDBG PROGRAMS FOR MUNICIPALITIES AND A FORMER US DOT PROGRAM MANAGER AND WORKED WITH IN THE US SENATE FOR AWHILE WHERE WE SET UP MANY OF THE FEMA PROGRAMS, THE FEMA GRANT PROGRAMS. I WAS IN FACT THE LEAD SENATE STAFFER WHO LED THE CREATION OF THE FIRE AND SAFER PROGRAMS, WHICH ARE TWO OF THE LARGEST PROGRAMS OUT THERE FOR ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL FIRE PROGRAMS. WE'VE GOT A LARGE NUMBER OF FOLKS AT THIS POINT WHO ARE COMING OFF THESE PANDEMIC PROJECTS.

COMING OFF OF THE CDBG, HEALTH EQUITY AND RECOVERY FROM THE PANDEMIC STUFF AND WE'RE LOOKING TO MOVE OUR FOLKS INTO THIS WORK.

THAT'S THE GENESIS OF THIS APPLICATION.

WHAT I WILL SAY IS WE'RE THE AVIS OF THE GROUP HERE.

IF ANGLETON SHOULD CHOOSE TO PICK HCAH SHOULD RUN ITS PROGRAMS, WE WILL WORK TO MAKE SURE THAT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING FALLS IN THE CRACKS HERE, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THE LEVEL OF SERVICE THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET FROM ANYBODY OUT OF MY SHOP.

I AM ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED THAT THE PEOPLE WE'VE GOT COMING INTO THIS NEW OPERATION AT HCAH ARE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING

[01:25:02]

THE HIGHEST QUALITY SERVICE AND YOU'RE GOING TO GET THAT FROM US AND THAT I THINK IS ALL YOU NEED TO HEAR FROM ME.

>> SIR. THANK YOU. WAS IT RON OR ROBERT. RON?

>> ROBERT.

>> ROBERT. I'M SORRY.

>> ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW WHAT? SINCE WE'VE GOT THIS SLIDE UP, I WILL JUST SHARE THIS WITH YOU BECAUSE IT IS WORTH NOTING.

IT'S AN INTERESTING PROGRAM DESIGN AND IT IS WORTH NOTING THAT WHAT WE'RE DOING, WE DON'T HAVE 400 PEOPLE ON STAFF.

HCAH IT HAS TOTAL NUMBER OF PERSONNEL AT THIS POINT, ABOUT 100 PEOPLE ON STAFF.

MANY OF THOSE ARE DEDICATED TO PARTICULAR CLIENT ENGAGEMENTS.

I'VE GOT ABOUT HALF A DOZEN WHO ARE AVAILABLE IN-HOUSE FOR THIS WORK.

BUT WHAT WE HAVE DONE IS WE'VE SET UP A NATIONWIDE NETWORK OF GRANT WRITERS.

WE'VE GONE OUT AND FOUND FOLKS WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED GRANT APPLICATIONS IN THE WHOLE HOST OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS AND WE'VE GOT THEM UNDER AGREEMENT WITH US SO THAT YOU'VE GOT ACCESS TO A VERY LARGE POOL OF GRANT WRITERS WITH EXPERTISE ACROSS THE BOARD.

>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FROM THE COUNCIL?

>> HERE ONE.

>> GO AHEAD, SIR.

>> SIR I JUST WANTED TO ASK ROBERT.

WE HAVE THE TWO TECH STOCK GRANTS THAT WE NEED TO GET SUBMITTED BY JUNE 5TH, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THEM ON TIME?

>> YES. WE LOOKED AT IT AND WE HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT DEADLINE.

IF WE GET UNDERWAY IMMEDIATELY, TIME IS ALWAYS OF THE ESSENCE AND IT'S ALREADY LATE APRIL.

BUT YES, WE CAN GET THOSE APPLICATIONS IN.

>> THANK YOU, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS FOR HCAH? I WANT TO SAY HCA, BECAUSE THAT'S BETTER THAN OUR BRAIN IF THAT'S A HEALTH CARE SYSTEM DOWN HERE.

BECAUSE I'M NOT USED TO THAT HCAH.

THANK YOU. ANYMORE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS?

>> YES.

>> GO AHEAD, SIR.

>> WHAT IS YOUR LEVEL OF ACTIVITY IN THE SOUTH HOUSTON AREA? ANYTHING YOU'VE DONE LATELY?

>> WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY IN HOUSTON.

WE'VE GOT TWO TEXAS CLIENTS AT THIS POINT, WICHITA FALLS, WHERE WE'RE DOING RPA COMPLIANCE WORK AND WOODWAY WHERE WE'RE DOING GRANT SURVEILLANCE, IF YOU WILL, WHERE WE'RE FINDING GRANTS AND WRITING GRANTS FOR THE CITY THERE.

>> THANK YOU AND WHERE'S WOODWAY?

>> WACO.

>> WACO AREA.

>> THANK YOU. ANYMORE QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? THERE'S NONE FROM THE TABLE SIR, SO WE'LL I GUESS PUT YOU ON HOLD AND WE'LL MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I WOULD TELL YOU SAFE TRAVELS HOME, BUT MAYBE YOU'RE ALREADY AT HOME [LAUGHTER] AND THAT LOOKS LIKE THAT WRAPS UP ITEM NUMBER 11 FOR ALL THE PRESENTATIONS AND THAT MOVES US INTO ITEM NUMBER 12 DISCUSSION. GO AHEAD, SIR.

>> WHOEVER WE SELECT TONIGHT, I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO ENGAGE THEM TOMORROW AND GIVE THEM DIRECTION AND GET THEM GOING.

I KNOW WE HAVE TO WORK OUT A CONTRACT.

>> ONCE YOU GET THE AUTHORIZATION FROM CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY MANAGER, DO THAT, YOU'D BE FINE.

>> GREAT. THANK YOU.

>> MOVING ON.

ITEM NUMBER 12,

[12. Discussion and possible action to approve one of the three submissions for the Grant Writing and Administration Services RFP.]

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE ONE OF THE THREE SUBMISSIONS FOR THE GRANT WRITING AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES RFP COUNSEL.

>> MAKE A MOTION, WE'RE OPEN.

>> ANY?

>> WHAT'S THAT?

>> DO WE NEED A MOTION?

>> WE'RE NOT.

>> YOU'RE DISCUSSING IT. [OVERLAPPING]

>> I'M SORRY.

>> DISCUSSION FOR SELECTION.

>> YEAH.

>> YEAH. SO WE CAN DISCUSS AND SEE WHAT WE WANT AND WHERE WE WANT TO GO.

>> YEAH. FIRST QUESTION THAT COMES TO MIND FOR ME IS, FUNDING FOR THIS, IS IT WRITTEN INTO THE GRANTS?

>> YES. THESE GRANTS ARE THERE'S SET AMOUNT FOR ENGINEERING, SET AMOUNT FOR GRANT ADMINISTRATION, AND SO THERE'S NO COST TO THE CITY.

>> OKAY.

>> THANK YOU, MARK, FOR THAT ONE.

>> I'LL JUST SAY FOR 99 PERCENT OF THEM, IF THERE'S A GRANT THAT COMES UP AND WE NEED TO PAY, FOR SURE, I'LL LET YOU KNOW BUT [OVERLAPPING]

>> YEAH, I JUST KNOW THAT MOST GRANTS YOU CAN WRITE IN INTO THE FUNDING.

>> YEAH. IF IT'S A FEDERAL OR STATE, THE COST IS AUTOMATICALLY, THERE'S A PERCENTAGE.

>> GOT YOU. THANK YOU.

>> QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR DIRECTION?

>> I WANT TO THANK THEM ALL THREE FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.

GRANT WRITING IS NEVER EASY.

FOR US, IT'S THE HOLY GRAIL.

[01:30:04]

WE'RE LIKE, OKAY, WE'LL WRITE A GRANT AND MAYBE WE'LL GET IT.

THEN WHEN WE DON'T GET IT, OH, THE GRANT WRITER IS HORRIBLE, THEY DIDN'T DO IT.

BUT I UNDERSTAND, THERE'S A LOT OF COMPETITION OUT THERE FOR FUNDING.

TO ME, THE BIGGEST FOCUS IS ROADS AND WATER AND SEWER FOR THE CITY.

I KNOW THAT WE HAVE LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANTS AND WE'VE BEEN PRETTY SUCCESSFUL ON THAT SIDE SO FAR.

ANYBODY THAT'S DOING IT, I HOPE WE DON'T GO BACKWARDS ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AND FIRST RESPONDERS AND THOSE GRANTS, BECAUSE WE'VE BEEN SUCCESSFUL.

BUT THE OTHER PART IS, WE HAVEN'T BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON SOME OF THE OTHER ONES, SO MAYBE THIS WOULD HELP US.

>> YES. THE OTHER GRANT THAT'S COMING UP, WE WENT UP TO HDAC MEETING, WE COULD DO GO IS THAT TIFF GRANT FOR HENDERSON ROAD PROJECT.

THEY'RE TELLING US THE CALL IS OUT THERE AND SO WE'LL HAVE TO GET A PROPOSAL IN IN THOSE THINGS.

THAT'S MORE OF A GRAY TIMELINE.

>> ANYTHING ELSE?

>> DOES ANYBODY THAT DID THE SCORING WANT TO TALK?

>> WHO WAS ON THE SCORING?

>> I WAS SICK THAT DAY, SO I DON'T KNOW WHO WAS. [OVERLAPPING]

>> I CAN'T REMEMBER EXACTLY. [LAUGHTER]

>> I ONLY KNOW OF A SINGLE MEMBER WHO WAS THERE.

>> YEAH. YOU COULD ASK FOR HER.

>> IT WAS A CLOSE ONE FOR THE GRANTWORKS AND CSRS.

>> GOT YOU.

>> DO YOU RECALL WHO WAS WITH YOU IN THE ROOM AND DID THEY FEED YOU? [LAUGHTER]

>> YES, THEY DID FEED US.

>> OKAY. THAT'S GOOD.

[LAUGHTER] I'M SURE IT WAS STAFF MEMBERS, RIGHT?

>> YES.

>> OKAY.

>> MY QUESTION ALSO IS, TO CHRIS, WHOEVER WE CHOOSE IS ALL THE WORK JUST THEM OR ARE WE GOING TO USE ANYBODY? I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT IT BRIEFLY EARLIER ABOUT THERE MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT ADMINISTRATOR THAN THE WRITER.

>> THIS IS GENERALLY LIKE WE HAVE OUR CITY ENGINEER, HDR, AND SO WE EXPECT THEM TO DO THE HEAVY LIFTING AND IF WE HAVE TO DEVIATE FROM THAT BECAUSE IT'S A FEDERAL GRANT AND WE HAVE TO PROCURE FOR IT AGAIN, THEN WE WILL HAVE TO GO FOLLOW THOSE RULES AND COME BACK FOR CHOICE AND DECISION.

BUT IT'S THAT AS YOU ALL HAVE ARTICULATED IT'S THAT TWO-WAY STREET, WE FIND GRANTS, WE KNOW HENDERSON ROADS IS IMPORTANT, THE TA IS IMPORTANT.

BUT IF THERE'S THINGS THAT THEY SEE GOING ON IN THE CITY AND THAT'S A DIALOGUE LIKE, HEY, HERE'S A GRANT, A LAW ENFORCEMENT GRANT THAT JUST CAME OUT, OR THE LEAD AND COPPER TEXAS WATER DEVELOPMENT BOARD GRANT IS COMING OUT.

THOSE ARE THINGS WE WANT TO PURSUE IN THE FUTURE AS THEY POP UP.

>> WELL, THERE WILL BE A TIME PERIOD FOR THIS GROUP.

WHOEVER WE CHOOSE, IS IT GOING TO BE FOR A YEAR, TWO YEARS?

>> I WOULD RECOMMEND WE FOLLOW WHAT WE DO WITH HDR AND SELECT THEM FOR A TIME PERIOD AND WE CAN DO AN EVALUATION AND A RESELECTION OR REVALIDATION, BUT PICK A TIME PERIOD.

THEN AS I WAS ASKING YOU TO BECAUSE NORMALLY WE WOULD APPROVE THEM, WE GO OUT AND DO THE CONTRACT, AND SO THAT COULD BE A MONTH OR SOMETHING.

WHOEVER YOU SELECT, YOU SELECT FOR THE FACT THAT THEY'LL SUBMIT THE GRANT PENDING WITH THE CONTRACTOR FOLLOW SO THAT THEY CAN GET EXECUTING ON THE TECH STOCK GRANTS AND MAYBE THE HDAC ONE.

>> WHAT WOULD YOU GIVE A GUIDELINE FOR TIME?

>> WE CAN HAVE MAYBE A CONTRACT IN A MONTH-AND-A-HALF.

>> THAT FOR THE LONGEVITY OF THE CONTRACT OR THE FULL EVALUATION?

>> THREE YEARS MIGHT BE GOOD AND WE CAN EVALUATE PERFORMANCE AND NUMBER OF APPLICATIONS AND PERFORMANCE ON THE GRANTS AND THOSE THINGS AND THEN WE CAN REEVALUATE.

>> I WOULD RECOMMEND WE NOT MAKE THAT TIMELINE TOO SHORT BECAUSE EXPERIENCE WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST, EVEN THE BEST GRANT WRITER, SOMETIMES IT TAKES A LONG TIME TO GET THAT GRANT ON THE GROUND AND WE'RE STARTING TO ACTUALLY BUILD SOMETHING WITH IT.

I'D HATE TO BE RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT AND SAY, OKAY, YOUR THREE YEARS IS UP, GO GET SOMEBODY ELSE.

>> THAT'S A GOOD POINT.

>> I WAS THINKING MORE LIKE FIVE. [OVERLAPPING]

>> CAN I INTERRUPT?

>> SURE.

[01:35:01]

>> I'M LOOKING AT THEIR REQUEST AS PUBLISHED, AND THE REQUEST DID HAVE A TERM. YES, IT DOES.

IT SAYS THAT THE TERM WOULD BE FOR ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF AWARD.

SO I WOULD SUGGEST WE STICK TO WHAT WE PUBLISHED.

>> OKAY. WITH THE PROMISE TO REEVALUATE IN A YEAR AND EITHER EXTEND OR GO BACK OUT FOR QUALIFICATIONS.

>> OKAY.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I KNOW WE'RE GETTING A LITTLE AHEAD OF OURSELVES, BUT WHOEVER WE CHOOSE TONIGHT, CAN WE DO THE ONE YEAR IN RE-EVALUATION, I GUESS SO TO SPEAK.

I DON'T KNOW WHO TO SPEAK TO, IF I'M SPEAKING TO CHRIS OR TO JUDITH, BUT I LIKE FOR US TO MAYBE FOLLOW CECIL'S GUIDANCE.

IN THE NEXT TIME AROUND, IF WE'RE SATISFIED, LET'S CHOOSE A MUCH LONGER WINDOW, 3-4 YEAR WINDOW, JUST BECAUSE WHERE I'M SITTING AND MAYBE I SIT THE SAME WAY AS CECIL, THIS DOES SEEM LIKE IT TAKES TIME TO GET TO THE TRACKS GREASED AND THINGS MOVING AND IT JUST IT'S NOT SNAP YOUR FINGER AND HERE COMES A FLOOD OF MONEY.

>> IF THERE'S ANYTHING THAT WE'VE LEARNED SERVING ON COUNCIL IS IT TAKES TIME TO GET THINGS DONE, SO WE UNDERSTAND.

>> [INAUDIBLE] OURS PROGRESS SMITH, AT LEAST FOR GRANTS WITHIN THE NEXT YEAR.

>> THAT'D BE GREAT.

>> THE REQUEST DOES SAY THAT IT CAN BE RENEWED.

YOU ABSOLUTELY CAN DO THAT.

>> I HAD TO GO BACK OUT. IT JUST CAN BE RENEWED.

>> [BACKGROUND].

>> GOOD DISCUSSION. WE'RE ALREADY ON ONE, I MOVE TWO.

>> MR. MAYOR, I MOVE THAT WE AWARD THE CONTRACT FOR THE GRANT WRITING ADMINISTRATION SERVICES TO THE TOP SCORE, WHICH WAS GRANTWORKS.

>> I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM WRIGHT. DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> I SECOND IT.

>> OKAY. IS THAT AMENDED?

>> SURE.

>> AMENDED.

>> WHATEVER SHE SAID ABOUT THEY CAN GET THE WORK PENDING THE CONTRACT.

>> THE CITY MANAGER.

>> SO YOU AUTHORIZED THE CITY MANAGER TO PROCEED IMMEDIATELY DESPITE THE FACT THAT WE DON'T HAVE AN EXECUTED CONTRACT YET, BUT WE'LL WORK ON THAT IMMEDIATELY.

>> SO MOVED.

>> ARE YOU GOING WITH THAT, MR. CECIL.

>> I'M GOOD WITH THAT. THAT'S GOOD FAITH.

>> ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION?

>> YEAH. I WANT TO SAY THAT I MET THE PRINCIPLE, THE GUY THAT LIVES IN SUGARLAND.

I MET BRUCE.

I MET HIM AT TML.

I THINK I STOOD AT HIS BOOTH FOR ABOUT AN HOUR AND HAD THAT LONG DISCUSSION ABOUT GRANT WRITING.

THANK HIM FOR JUST SITTING THERE AND SCHOOLING ME ON IT. I APPRECIATE THAT.

>> WE'RE IN A DISCUSSION PAGE RIGHT NOW?

>> YES SIR, WE ARE. [LAUGHTER] ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS?

>> I'M A CAPTAIN, LET ME SHARE WITH YOU.

IN MY FORMER LIFE AS A CONSULTING ENGINEER, I'VE HAD QUITE A BIT OF EXPERIENCE WITH GRANTWORKS, MR. [INAUDIBLE] AND THINGS ALWAYS WENT VERY WELL.

>> THANK YOU, SIR. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? HEARING NONE, CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.

THAT MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH.

THANK YOU ALL TO THE OTHER TWO AS WELL FOR SUBMITTING IT AND TAKING TIME OUT TO ENLIGHTEN US.

THANK YOU ALL.

ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON, ITEM NUMBER 13,

[13. Discussion and possible action on a response to the Final Plat for Windrose Green Section 3 Subdivision disapproval on 4/11/2023 by City Council. The subject property consists of 23.70 acres, 122 Lots, 3 Blocks, 4 Reserves, in the T.S. Lee Survey, Abstract #318, is in the City of Angleton ETJ and is located on the south side of FM 523 approximately 2,500 feet west of the FM 523/SH 35 intersection.]

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A RESPONSE TO THE FINAL PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 3, SUBDIVISION DISAPPROVAL ON 4-11-2023 BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 23.70 ACRES, 122 LOTS, THREE BLOCKS, FOUR RESERVES IN THE TS LEE SURVEY.

ABSTRACT NUMBER 318 IS IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON ETJ AND IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FM 523, APPROXIMATELY 2,500 FEET WEST OF FM 523, SOUTH HIGHWAY 35 INTERSECTION. MR. OTIS.

>> GOOD EVENING MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 3 SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT.

AS YOU RECALL IN YOUR APRIL 11TH MEETING, THIS PARTICULAR FINAL PLAT WAS CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL AND THERE WERE A COUPLE OF CONDITIONS THAT COUNCIL FELT NEEDED SOME ATTENTION.

WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY IN RESPONSE TO YOUR DISAPPROVAL, TWO IN FAVOR, THREE OPPOSED OF THE PLAT, IN WHICH WE SENT THE RESULTING LETTER TO THE APPLICANTS OF THOSE TWO OUTSTANDING ISSUES.

OF COURSE, THE FIRST WAS TO DEAL WITH THE TEXTUAL CHANGES TO THE PLAT NOTATIONS REGARDING THE DEED REFERENCES.

SO THEY WERE ABLE TO ADDRESS CONDITION NUMBER 1.

THEN THE SECOND HAD TO DO WITH A LOT OF DIRT THAT YOU SEE MOVING, THE GRADING, THE STAGING OF DIRT MATERIALS BEING STORED AND OF COURSE,

[01:40:04]

STAGED AND HAULING OFF AND ON THE SITE.

SO WE'VE RECEIVED A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS AS COUNCIL IS AWARE REGARDING THE TRUCK MOVEMENT AND WE DISCUSSED THAT IN YOUR LAST MEETING.

THE APPLICANT HAS BEEN VERY, I THINK RESPONSIVE TO THE ISSUES AT HAND.

THEY HAVE DEALT WITH CONDITION NUMBER 2 AS IT RELATE TO THE EFFECTS ON THE DRAINAGE OF THIS SECTION AS WELL AS THE COMPLETION OF THE FUTURE SECTIONS.

WE DO HAVE SUBMISSION IN RESPONSE TO THE TWO ISSUES BY THE APPLICANT.

THE ENGINEERING TEAM FROM COSTELLO IS AVAILABLE HERE TO DEAL WITH THE QUESTIONS AT HAND TO SHOW YOU PROGRESS THAT THEY'VE MADE SINCE THE LAST MEETING IN TERMS OF MOVING THE DIRT MATERIALS AND FINISHING OFF CERTAIN SECTIONS.

DUE TO THE WEATHER, THERE'S BEEN A SLIGHT DELAY AND THEY WILL EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU.

IN RESPONSE TO STATE LAW AND IN RESPONSE TO MY LETTER OF RESULTS TO THEM, THEY HAVE SUBMITTED A RESPONSE TO YOU TO ACTUALLY DEAL WITH THE FINAL PLAT TO SEE IF THOSE CONDITIONS CAN BE REMOVED AND THAT THEY CAN GET CONSIDERATION OF FINAL APPROVAL.

I'LL HALT HERE AND ALEX AND ROBERT, THEY WILL ADDRESS THE TECHNICAL ISSUES.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I WILL SAY THAT HDR HAS REVIEWED THEIR RESUBMISSION AND WE HAVE CLEARED A NUMBER OF TEXTUAL CHANGES, FLOODPLAIN REFERENCES REGARDING SOME OF THE DRAINAGE ISSUES, AND THEY HAVE MADE THOSE CORRECTIONS AND WE HAVE CLEARED THOSE. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU SIR.

>> YES, GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

MY NAME IS ALEX KOSH.

I'M THE DISTRICT ENGINEER AND ALSO THE DEVELOPER'S ENGINEER.

SINCE APRIL 11TH COMMENT CAME THROUGH, WE HAVE WORKED WITH THE CITY AND ALSO ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT REGARDING THOSE COMMENTS.

WE HAVE PROPOSED SOME ADDITIONAL INLETS AND SWELL ALONG THE CHURCH TO IMPROVE THEIR ALREADY EXISTING SITUATION.

RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE ADDRESSED THE STOCKPILE SITUATION AS MUCH AS WE COULD IN THIS SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAD RAIN ON THURSDAY, FRIDAY, MONDAY, SUNDAY.

THEY WERE ABLE TO REDUCE THE STOCKPILE AMOUNT.

THE STORY ABOUT THE STOCKPILE THAT HAS CONCERNED THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS WHEN THE CONTRACTOR BID ON THIS PROJECT, THEY HAVE WORKED WITH SUBCONTRACTOR WHO IS USING ON-ROAD TRUCKS TO BRING TO THIS SITE.

THEY COULD NOT GO BEYOND A CERTAIN POINT WITH THE ON-ROAD TRUCKS.

SO WHAT HAPPENED, THE CONTRACTOR UTILIZED ANOTHER CONTRACTOR TO USE OFFSITE TRUCKS.

SO THEY TEMPORARILY MOVED THIS STOCKPILE TO SOMEWHERE THAT IS NOT AS A SHORT-TERM TO GENERAL VIEW.

BUT THEN AGAIN, THE FOCUS WAS SECTION 2 WHICH IS ON THE NORTH SIDE ALONG FM 523, HAD A MORE TIGHT SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION AND THE CONTRACTOR WORKED WITH TXDOT TO OBTAIN A TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY TO ENTER FROM THAT SIDE.

BECAUSE ALSO COUNTY HAD INFORMED US THAT BECAUSE FOR SECTION 1, OUR ROADS ARE STILL UNDER WARRANTY PERIOD.

THEY SAID IF YOU BRING CERTAIN LOADS OF TRUCK THROUGH THE PAVEMENT, WE'RE NOT GOING TO OVERTAKE THE ROADS.

THERE WAS QUITE A BIT OF CHALLENGES, THE TIMING, GETTING APPROVAL, AND WORKING WITH THE COUNTY.

THAT'S HOW THAT STOCKPILE WAS LEFT THERE BECAUSE THE CONTRACTOR WAS FORCED TO BRING THE ADDITIONAL THERE NOT USING HENDERSON ANYMORE BECAUSE WE HAVE ALSO BEEN INFORMED THAT THERE WAS SOME CONCERN ABOUT USING COUNTY 48 SOUTH TO HENDERSON.

IN ADDITION, TO ALSO STOP GOING THAT ROUTE, THE DEVELOPER ANGLETON HAS ALSO INFORMED US AND THROUGH US TO THE CITY THAT WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THE DAMAGES THAT HAS HAPPENED ON THAT HENDERSON ROAD DURING THE HAULING OF THERE WHICH IS GOOD FOR THE FRONT DOOR OF INVITATION TO THE SUBDIVISION AS WELL AS BEING COMPLIANCE WITH WHATEVER HAS HAPPENED.

STOCKPILE ISSUES AS OF TODAY BECAUSE I'VE BEEN COMMUNICATING AND THEY'RE SENDING DRAWN PICTURES FOR US.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAVE ABOUT 7-8 FEET OF HEIGHT WHICH IF IT DRIES TOMORROW

[01:45:04]

BECAUSE THESE PAST TWO DAYS THE SITE WAS ABSOLUTELY NOT ACCESSIBLE, SO WE WILL HAVE THAT HOPEFULLY WORKING THROUGH SATURDAY REDUCED TO NONE OR MAYBE 2-3 FEET THAT IT'S NOT VISIBLE FROM A DISTANCE.

THERE WAS ANOTHER COMMENT THERE THAT IS PENDING, BUT MR. SPRIGS TOLD US ABOUT THE NAME CHANGE ON A LOOP ROAD THAT THERE MAY BE A CONCERN.

THIS WAS DONE DURING THE PRELIMINARY PLAT BY ANOTHER CONSULTANT AND WE JUST TOOK IT AND MOVED FORWARD.

CERTAINLY, THAT REQUIREMENT IS WITHIN SOME CITIES AND SOME CITIES DON'T HAVE IT.

THEY'RE USED TO MORE CITY OF HOUSTON, SO ANYTIME THAT WE HAVE A CHANGE OF DIRECTION, THEY WOULD CHANGE THE NAME ON THE STREET.

BUT WE WENT AHEAD AND USED ONE OF THE ROADS AND PENDING YOUR APPROVAL, WE WILL HAVE TO GO BACK TO ALL OUR CONSTRUCTION PLANS, CHANGE THEM, RUN IT TO THE COUNTY.

IF IT'S AN ISSUE THAT IT MUST BE CHANGED, WE WILL DO THAT.

IF IT WAS JUST A SUGGESTION WE WOULD REQUEST YOUR APPROVAL AS IS TO ALLEVIATE THE SITUATION OF GOING BACK FOR IT BECAUSE CONSTRUCTION IS ONGOING RIGHT NOW.

AS SOON AS WE DON'T HAVE THAT, THEN IT'S GOING TO BE NO APPROVAL STANDPOINT FROM THE COUNTY.

JOB WILL STOP.

LAST TIME WHEN WE REMOVED ONE ISLAND IT TOOK A GOOD TWO MONTHS FOR US TO GET APPROVAL.

SO CONTRACTOR WAS BASICALLY OUT OF WORK FOR THOSE TWO MONTHS AND IT HURTS THE SCHEDULE OF DELIVERY, BUT IT'S YOUR DECISION.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WHAT ABOUT THE APARTMENT COMPLEX NEXT DOOR TO YOU? HOW MUCH ELEVATION DIFFERENCE DO YOU HAVE?

>> WE ARE MATCHING.

>> YOU'RE MATCHING THOSE.

>> YES. ACTUALLY, AS A MATTER OF FACT, THE DEVELOPER HAD US REWORK A TEMPORARY SWELL DURING THEIR CONSTRUCTION BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO PUT A FENCE THERE.

SO WE'RE MATCHING AT THE ELEVATION AND WE'RE PUTTING A BLEEDER SWELL NEXT. THAT WAS A TEMPORARY.

BUT AFTER WITH THIS SITUATION, WE ARE PUTTING AREA INLETS THAT ARE CONNECTED TO THE MAIN INLETS ON THE ROAD.

THAT AREA IS FAIRLY FLAT, TWO PERCENT MAYBE.

>> ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WHEN YOU'RE DONE AND YOU HAVE A ROAD THAT CONNECTS TO HENDERSON.

>> YES, SIR.

>> ARE YOU GOING TO DRIVE DOWN TO HENDERSON OR IS IT GOING TO MEET EVENLY?

>> IT'S MEETING EVENLY BECAUSE OF THE ADA REQUIREMENT.

BECAUSE WE'RE DOING TWO FEET OF CURB CUT.

I MEAN, WE HAVE PAVEMENT CUT TO DIAL INTO THE PAVEMENTS SO WE'RE MATCHING AT THAT ELEVATION.

[NOISE] MAYBE THE LITTLE BIT OF THE APRON WILL DRAIN INTO HENDERSON BUT EVERYTHING ELSE IS GOING INTO OUR SYSTEM.

ALSO IF THERE WAS A CONCERN ABOUT THE DRAINAGE, WHEN WE DID THE DRAINAGE IMPACT ANALYSIS AND CITY HAS REVIEWED IT AND ALSO ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT HAS REVIEWED IT.

THEN WE CAME IN JOINT VENTURE WITH THE CITY AND CHANGE THE CULVERTS, A PARTICIPANT ON CHANGING THE CULVERTS.

THE 211 BY NINE FOOT THAT IS THE BRUSHY BY USE GOING ACROSS HAS REDUCED THE FLOODPLAIN THAT WAS ALREADY EXISTING ON THE FACE OF THE FLAT.

ACTUALLY, I DO HAVE A COPY OF THAT SHOWING THE BEFORE AND AFTER WHERE IT HAS TREMENDOUSLY REDUCE THE FLOODPLAIN AT THE ENTRANCE NEXT TO THE CHAIR.

IT ALSO HELPED THEM BEING OUT OF THE FLOOD PLAIN.

THE TWO FIRST LOT, LOTS 1 AND 2, THAT IT'S BASED ON THE CURRENT FEMALE MAPS ARE IN THE FLOODPLAIN.

WITH THE USE OF THAT EXHIBIT, WE COULD ACTUALLY WE STARTED THE PROCESS OF DOING ELEVATION CERTIFICATE AND MOVING IT OUT OF THE FLOODPLAIN.

>> [BACKGROUND].

>> YEAH.

>> [BACKGROUND].

>> YEAH.

>> JOHN, I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, I MEAN, I'M SATISFIED WITH THE ANSWERS THEY'VE GIVEN US TONIGHT, BUT IF HENDERSON IS EVER, WE GET THE FUNDING AND WE START MOVING ON IT.

WHAT DOES THAT DO FOR HENDERSON'S IS GOING TO BE CUT DOWN?

>> CUT DOWN WE'LL HAVE TO LOOK AT IT.

[01:50:02]

>> JOHN, WE GO TO THE THANK YOU.

>> I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK OF IN THE FUTURE.

IF THEY'RE DOING IT NOW, THERE'S SOMETHING THAT WE CAN BE MODIFIED.

>> WE WILL HAVE TO BE REAL CAREFUL RIGHT THERE IN THAT AREA BECAUSE IT IS RIGHT THERE BY WHERE BRUSHY BILE COMES IN TO THAT AREA.

IT'S STILL GOING TO HAVE FLOOD PLAIN.

IF YOU WERE TO LOWER IT TOO MUCH, YOU CAN OPEN THAT BACK OUT TO LET IT GO.

TO SAY THAT THE WAY THEY'RE TYING INTO IT, YOU CAN ALWAYS GO BACK TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, MAKE A SMOOTH TRANSITION.

WHATEVER THEY DO, WE CAN TIE IT IN.

IT'S JUST, I DON'T WANT ANYBODY TO THINK WE'RE GOING TO DROP IT LIKE A CURB AND GUTTER RIGHT THERE NEAR THAT AREA TO WHERE WE COULD POTENTIALLY ALLOW SOME OF THAT WATER TO ESCAPE FROM HIGH BANKS?

>> YEAH, I'M THINKING WHO'S DIMES ARE GOING TO BE ON. THAT'S WHAT I WAS THINKING.

>> THAT WOULD BE PROBABLY JUST LIKE ANY OTHER DRIVEWAY.

I MEAN, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE IRREGULAR DRIVEWAY REPLACEMENT WHERE YOU COME AND REPLACE THAT APRON AND MAKE THAT TIE-IN

>> YEAH.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS?

>> YEAH. I DON'T KNOW WHO THIS GOES TO THE ONE QUESTION ABOUT THE ROADS, THE NAMING OF THE STREETS.

DO WE HAVE A STANDARD IF SO?

>> WELL, I DON T THINK THE CITY OF ANGLETON HAS STANDARD EITHER WAYS.

WE COULD BACK TO ONE STREET.

THE CITY OF HOUSTON IS PRETTY CONSISTENT ABOUT THAT.

ALSO IN CITY OF SUGARLAND IS LIKE THAT.

FORT WAYNE COUNTY CARES MORE OR LESS, BRAZORIA TOO.

WHAT WE DID BASICALLY WHEN THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS SUBMITTED, IT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CAM BY META, IT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE CITY AND COUNTY.

FOR THE STREET NAME, THEY LOOK INTO THE DATABASE TO SEE IF THERE'S A DUPLICATE, THEN THEY SEND IT FOR 911 AND ALSO ADDRESSING.

EVERYTHING WAS CLEAR.

WHEN WE SUBMITTED THAT, WE JUST CONTINUED WITH THE SAME UP UNTIL THIS WAS RAISED.

EITHER WAYS, THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT EITHER THIS WAY OR THAT WAY.

>> JUST FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I ALWAYS LIKE CONSISTENCY, FAIRNESS SO THAT'S ALL.

>> THANKS.

>> I CAN UNDERSTAND NAMING STREETS, DIFFERENT NAMES IF THEY'RE LONGER THAN THE ARM.

BUT THESE EAST-WEST RUNS ARE LIKE 300 FEET OF PIECE.

IN A NORTH-SOUTH ROAD IS ANOTHER 200 FEET.

>> YES.

>> TOTAL OF 800 PETERS STREET AND THREE DIFFERENT STREET NAMES? WHEN AUNT SUSIE HAS TO COME FIND ME THAT I'VE LIVE ON BRIGHT STAR WAY AND SHE COMES THERE AND SHE CAN'T FIND A SIGN THAT SAYS BRIGHT STAR WAY.

BUT IF SHE KNEW THAT I LIVED ON SAVANNA AND IT WENT ALL WAY AROUND.

[OVERLAPPING]

>> AT EACH INTERSECTION, WE ARE OBLIGED TO PUT A STREET PLAQUE.

EVERY TIME THAT WHOEVER COMES ENTERS, LET'S SAY FROM THE NORTH ENTRANCE, SOON AS HE TURNS, THEY WILL SEE.

>> UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT WHERE'S THE BRIGHT STAR WAY STREET SIGN GOING TO BE? BACK THERE BY BRIGHT STAR STREET SIGN FAR AWAY?

>> PARALLEL TO THAT THE STREET.

>> IF DRIVING DOWN SUMMER BREEZE WAY AND YOU'RE LOOKING FOR BRIGHT STAR WAY, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO FIND A STREET SIGN BECAUSE IT'S 300 FEET TO THE WEST?

>> YES.

>> IF WE HAD ALL ONE STREET NAME, THEN YOU HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THAT.

>> I AGREE WITH MR. BOOTH.

>> SAME.

>> I AGREE ALSO AND I WOULD LIKE TO GO WITH THE SAVANNA ROWS RATHER THAN HERITAGE ROWS.

WE ALREADY HAVE A HERITAGE OAKS AND THE HERITAGE PARK.

>> MAYBE EVEN HERITAGE. [OVERLAPPING].

>> WE'VE ALREADY CHANGED IT FLAT AND DEPENDING ON YOUR DECISION, WE COULD GO CHANGE IT AT ALL TO SAVANNA.

>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, COMMENTS?

>> I NEED JUDITH.

>> CHRIS, WORSE. WHAT DID YOU JUST GO.

>> TO THE RESTROOM. HAVE A QUESTION FOR JUDITH.

TAKE A SLIGHT PAUSE.

>> I MEAN, MAYBE OTIS CAN ANSWER.

WHAT ACTION DO YOU NEED FROM US TONIGHT OVER THIS?

>> ACCORDING TO STATE LAW, YOU ARE BASICALLY BE CREATING A NEW ACTION ON THE PLAT BECAUSE THE OTHER DECISION WAS A DENIAL, OF COURSE, OR A DISAPPROVAL.

YOU ARE RESPONDING TO THEIR RESPONSE OF THE COMMENTS.

ONCE YOU CONSIDER THEM TO BE CLEARED IN SATISFIED,

[01:55:03]

THEN THE NEXT ACTION OF CONSIDERATION WOULD BE APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THOSE RESPONSE COMMENTS.

>> THAT WOULD BE WE'D BE GIVING APPROVAL OR DENIAL TONIGHT.

WE WOULD JUST BE ACCEPTING THEIR.

>> WE'LL TALK WITH JUDITH REGARDING THE DEADLINE.

IN TERMS OF MY LETTER, I'M GIVEN A CERTAIN NUMBER OF DAYS TO DICTATE WHAT YOUR DISAPPROVAL ACTION CONSISTED OF, WHAT THOSE CONDITIONS OF DISAPPROVAL WERE.

THEY DO NOT HAVE A DEADLINE TO RESPOND, BUT SINCE THEY HAVE RESPONDED JUDITH IF THE QUESTION WOULD BE THEIR NEXT STEPS.

THEY HAVE RESPONDED TO THE DISAPPROVAL THE APPLICANTS, THAT IS.

>> IF ALL OF THE ISSUES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED AND THERE'S NOTHING OUTSTANDING THEN CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO GO AHEAD AND APPROVE IT.

>> I DON'T KNOW IF SHE ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION.

[OVERLAPPING] I THINK THAT'S WHAT WE WERE SAYING THE SAME THING. YES.

>> YOU'RE WANTING US TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT TONIGHT? IT'S NOT GOING TO GO BACK TO P AND Z EITHER FOR REVIEW?

>> NO, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO GO BACK THROUGH THE PROCESS BECAUSE THE CONDITION THE CITY SET OUT, THE PROBLEMS AND THEY'VE ADDRESSED ALL OF THEM.

IT HAS OUR ENGINEER SAID THAT THAT THEY'VE ADDRESSED ALL OF THEM.

>> YES.

>> YEAH.

>> THE QUESTION ESSENTIALLY IS TODAY'S SATISFY THE CONDITIONS THAT WE RAISED, I GUESS AT THE LAST MEETING.

IS THAT WHAT WE'RE VOTING ON? I GUESS I'M TRYING TO MAKE SURE THAT.

>> NO, YOU HAVE TO MOVE TO APPROVE THE PLAT.

YOU'RE VOTING TO APPROVE THE PLAT.

IF THE CITY ENGINEER AND THE BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT HAS TOLD YOU THAT ALL OF THE CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED THAT WERE SET FORTH FOR THE DENIAL, THEN YES, YOU HAVE TO GO AHEAD AND VOTE TO APPROVE.

>> BUT THAT'S NOT WHAT THE AGENDA SAYS.

THE AGENDA SAYS DISCUSSION POSSIBLE EXCELLENT RESPONSE TO THE FINAL PLAT.

DOESN'T SAY FOR APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT.

>> HANG ON.

>> I ACCEPT THE RESPONSES, BUT I DON'T THINK ALL THE DIRT IS GONE YET.

YOU SAID THAT A LITTLE BIT, THAT'LL BE CLEARED SOON.

YOU SAY IT'S COMPLETELY DONE BECAUSE IT'S NOT.

THE RESPONSE IS APPROPRIATE, I AGREE WITH THE RESPONSE.

>> YOU'RE RIGHT, THE AGENDA SUMMARY, EDOM DOES NOT SAY VOTE FOR APPROVAL.

>> MY LETTER OF DISAPPROVAL OR RESULT BASICALLY SAY THAT THESE ITEMS NEEDED TO BE ADDRESSED.

MY ASSUMPTION IS THEY ARE ADDRESSING THE ITEMS THAT WERE OUTSTANDING FOR THE PLAN AND IT WOULD MOVE FORWARD.

>> HOW MANY DAYS IN ARE WE?

>> I'M SORRY.

>> HOW MANY DAYS IN ARE WE?

>> WAS DISAPPROVED TWO WEEKS AGO.

>> NO, FROM INITIAL SUBMISSION.

>> I WOULD HAVE TO START COUNTING THAT.

>> I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION WITHOUT ME HAVING TO COME BACK.

BUT MY UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT WE WERE DOING TONIGHT WAS THAT WHATEVER THE DISAPPROVAL WAS, WHATEVER THE CONDITIONS WERE, YOU ATTEND OUT A LETTER AND SET OUT THE CONDITIONS, SET OUT WHAT NEEDED TO BE DONE.

IF YOU'RE SAYING WHAT'S BEEN DONE, IT'S DONE.

>> IT'S ALL DONE AND THERE'S NO OBJECTIONS FROM THE CITY.

>> YOU'RE SAYING IT'S NOT.

>> THEY JUST SAID THAT IT [OVERLAPPING].

>> THIS PART WAS DELAYED DUE TO WEATHER.

THE CONTRACTOR WILL DO IT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS, A FEW DAYS.

[INAUDIBLE] NEXT FOR TWO WEEKS.

THE WAY THAT WE RESPONDED VERY TIMELY, AND I HAVE BEEN COMMUNICATING WITH ALL THESE AND ALSO HDR ENGINEER IN TERMS OF ADDRESSING SOMETIMES WITHIN MINUTES, NOT EVEN WAITING ONE WHOLE DAY.

IT SHOWS THAT WE HAVE FULL INTENTION OF WORKING WITH THE CITY.

BECAUSE WE HAVE FOUR MOTHER SECTIONS AND IT'S GOING TO GO THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS.

I WOULD NOT WANT TO JEOPARDIZE THAT SITUATION.

BUT IF YOU'D LIKE TO WAIT UNTIL YOU SEE ALL THE DEBT GOES, THEN IT'S AT YOUR PAR.

>> THEN THE OTHER OPTION WOULD BE TO MAKE A CONDITION OF, SO YOUR APPROVAL BE CONDITIONED THAT WHATEVER YOUR OUTSTANDING CONDITION IS OF THE DIRT BEING REMOVED.

BECAUSE YOU FEEL AS THOUGH IT CAN BE SATISFIED IN WHAT PERIOD OF TIME.

[02:00:03]

>> IF IT'S DRY FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS.

OUR INTENTION WAS, AND THE EMAILS THAT I SENT TO ALL THIS THAT I'M GOING TO TAKE PICTURES ON FRIDAY, MONDAY, AND TUESDAY.

BUT UNFORTUNATELY, THESE PAST THREE DAYS, WE TRY TO SEND THE PICTURES OF THE DRONE HAS BEEN WET.

THE CONTRACT THERE HAVE BEEN IN THEIR BACK.

I HAVE PROMISED TO SHOW THE PROGRESS.

THEY SENT ME PICTURES OF THE DRONE THAT HAS 2, 3, 5, 6 INCHES OF WATER EVERYWHERE, SO HOW DO YOU WANT ME TO MOVE THE HEAVY TRUCK? I DID NOT HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THAT.

IT WAS THE CONDITION THAT NATURE BASICALLY HAD INTERFERED.

BUT OF COURSE, THOSE LOTS HAD TO BE DELIVERED SO THAT STOCKPILE IS NET BENEFIT LAST YEAR.

BECAUSE WE NEED TO FINISH THE SECTION AND DELIVER THE LOTS BY END OF JUNE.

WE HAVE TO WORK AGAINST THE WEATHER TO COME UP WITH SOME ALTERNATIVE TO EXPEDITE.

WE WILL DEFINITELY DO THAT.

>> WHAT WE NEED TO DO IS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL BASED ON THE WEATHER CONDITIONS CHANGING AND SET A PROPOSED DATE.

>> I STILL GO BACK TO WHAT THE AGENDA SET HOSTED, THAT WENT IN THE PAPER AND EVERYTHING IT DOESN'T SAY APPROVAL OF A PLAN, IT JUST SAID APPROVAL OF AN ACTION OR RESPONSE TO [OVERLAPPING]

>> YOU'RE RIGHT, THEIR LANGUAGE DOESN'T SAY THAT, BUT BY STATUTE, ONCE THE CONDITIONS ARE CLEAR, AND BECAUSE IT'S A MINISTERIAL ACT, THERE'S NOTHING LEFT FOR THE CITY COUNCIL TO DO, AND SO, APPROVE IT.

>> THAT'S IF WE ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSES. WE'RE SATISFIED.

IF WE ACCEPT THAT THEY ARE FREE TO SATISFY THAT THEIR RESPONSE IS APPROPRIATE, THEN WE HAVE NO RESPONSE THEN TO APPROVE.

>> BUT YOU CAN APPROVE CONDITIONALLY BECAUSE WE HAVE A WEATHER ISSUE.

APPARENTLY, EVERYTHING'S NOT BEEN COMPLETELY SATISFIED, BUT ONLY DUE TO WEATHER, SO IT WOULD BE A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL.

>> I DON'T WANT TO ARGUE. I KNOW I'M BAD AT THIS.

BUT, WE TAKE IT ON GOOD FAITH THAT IT'S BASED ON THE WEATHER.

YOU SAY IT'S ONLY BECAUSE OF GOOD WEATHER, BUT WE'RE HAVING TO ACCEPT THAT AS YOUR ANSWER.

>> WELL, YOU CAN [OVERLAPPING].

>> I HAVE SOMETHING > I KNOW. I'M NOT SAYING IT HAS BEEN RAINING, I'M NOT BLIND.

I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND.

>> I'D REPEAT MY FIRST RESPONSE. SORRY, WITH MY FIRST RESPONSE THAT I SENT, I SENT THREE DIFFERENT PICTURES, THREE DIFFERENT DATES, SHOWING HOW THIS DOC FILE HAS BEEN REDUCED THOSE FEW DAYS.

WHICH IS IN THE PACKET THAT I SUBMITTED.

IF YOU WANT, I HAVE A HARD COPY HERE THAT YOU WILL SEE WHAT THE DIFFERENCES HAVE BEEN.

>> WHAT DO YOU THINK THAT MEANS? HOW MANY TRUCKLOADS WAS THAT?

>> WELL, BASICALLY IT WAS A SEVEN DAYS WORTH OF WORK.

THEY DID FOUR DAYS, SO THEY NEED THREE MORE DAYS TO COMPLETE THAT, THREE GOOD DRY WEATHER.

IF TOMORROW AND SATURDAYS ARE DRY, THIS WILL BE OUT BY NEXT TUESDAY MORNING.

IT'S NOT THAT MATTER OF DAY BECAUSE I NEED THOSE DATE ON MY LOTS TO FINISH GRADING AND BACK FEELING BEHIND THE CAB SO THAT I CAN TEST ALL THE WATER [NOISE] THAT BEFORE THE RESIDENTS OR THE COUNCIL IS WORRIED ABOUT THIS, I'M WORRIED MORE BECAUSE THESE WOULD NOT HELP ME WITH THE COMPLETION OF MY PROJECT.

>> I UNDERSTAND. I DON'T WORK IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY.

I JUST KNOW THAT PROBABLY IF ANY JOB RESPONSIBILITY THAT IF SOMETHING IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT TO YOU, THEN YOU GET IT DONE.

THAT'S ALL I KNOW. I'M NOT SAYING THAT THERE WASN'T A CONFLICT PERHAPS WITH THE WEATHER, BUT DEPENDS ON HOW VALUABLE IT WAS TO YOU THEN YOU RESPOND TO.

PERHAPS YOUR WORK WILL SHOW THAT.

I DON'T KNOW, THAT'S ALL I'M SAYING.

IF YOU'RE TELLING ME I'M TAKEN ON GOOD FAITH THAT YOU ARE ACTING BECAUSE OF WEATHER.

BUT I WOULD HAVE THOUGHT THAT OUR RESPONSE ON LAST OR TWO TUESDAYS AGO SHOWED HOW SERIOUS WE WERE AND WOULD EXPECT RECIPROCAL ACTION.

THAT'S ALL. I DON'T WANT TO GET ARGUMENT.

I MEAN, I TAKE YOUR GOOD FAITH.

IF YOU SAY YOU'VE GIVEN YOUR BEST EFFORT AND WHEN THE WEATHER IS.

BUT AGAIN, I'M TRUSTING YOU.

[02:05:02]

>> YES, SIR.

>> WELL, AND JUST A REMINDER, YOU JUST DON'T HAVE TO TRUST THEM.

YOU CAN ASK YOUR CITY ENGINEER FOR HIS ENGINEERING OPINION.

>> WE'LL TELL YOU JOHN.

>> WE HAVE RECEIVED QUITE A BIT OF RAIN THE LAST COUPLE OF DAYS.

WHEN YOU MOVE THIS AMOUNT OF DIRT, YOU JUST CAN'T JUST PICK UP AND START MOVING IMMEDIATELY. IT CAN'T BE PLANNED.

YOU SAY YOU ASKED HIM SEVERAL TUESDAYS AGO, SO HE'S GOT TO GET THE EQUIPMENT AND EVERYTHING SCHEDULED, GET READY TO MOVE.

HE'S GOT PICTURES OF IT DECLINING MORE AND MORE AND MORE.

THREE MORE DAYS IS WHAT YOU'RE EXPECTING.

YOU CAN APPROVE IT UPON IT CONTINUOUSLY THAT IF THEY GOT A WEEK, TWO WEEKS TO GET THIS THING DONE ON THE APPROVAL PENDING WEATHER, AND PUT THE PRESSURE ON HIM TO WHERE HE ASKED TO DELIVER.

IF HE DOESN'T DELIVER, IT'S NOT APPROVED.

THE OTHER THING Y'ALL ARE GOING TO HAVE TO TRAVEL DOWN THE ROAD A LITTLE BIT, CORRECT.

THE LAST THING YOU WANT DO IS FORCE HIM TO HAVE GO AND LOAD UP A DUMP TRUCK WITH DIRT ON TIRES FULL OF MUD AND TRAVEL DOWN YOUR STREETS.

THERE'S SAFETY ALONG WITH THAT ALSO AS WELL.

>> BOTH OPERATIONS ARE DIFFERENT, HAULING THAT FROM DETENTION POND INTO THE SECTION WHICH DEFINITELY WILL CAUSE THERE TO BE ON THE ROAD WHICH THE CONTRACTOR HAS ROOMS AND THE JOB SITE, AND WE BASICALLY HAVE THEM ROOM THREE, FOUR TIMES A DAY NOW, AFTER ALL THE COMPLAINTS AND THAT.

THAT IS A DIFFERENTIAL. BUT IF I WOULD NEED OFF-ROAD TRUCKS FOR THESE AND OFF-ROAD TRUCKS ARE USUALLY MORE HEAVY, SO IF THEY RUN INTO A LAYER OF DIRT WHICH IS NOT AT LEAST 9-12 INCHES DRY THEY WILL SINK IN AND THEN THEY HAVE TO HAVE RESCUE TRUCKS COMING IN.

I HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE WEATHER IS TOTALLY DRY FOR TWO DAYS BEFORE DOING THAT, IT'S ABOUT THREE DAYS' WORTH OF WORK NO MORE THAN THAT.

AS I MENTIONED, IF THREE DAYS OF DRY WEATHER, THIS WILL BE OUT BY NEXT WEDNESDAY MORNING. IT'S JUST THAT.

WHEN I WAS DRIVING HERE FROM HOUSTON, THERE WAS A LITTLE BIT OF SPRINKLES COMING IN AND I SAID, OH MY GOD, ANOTHER RAIN, SO IT'S ALL RELATED.

>> I THINK WE'RE HEADED FOR MORE RAIN THURSDAY, IT LOOKS LIKE SO.

>> TONIGHT AND THURSDAY.

>> THAT'S UNFORTUNATE, BUT I TOLD THEM THAT, I DON'T CARE IF YOU TAKE THIS STATE AND PUT IT RIGHT TO THE GRADE.

I WANT YOU TO KNOCK THIS DOWN LESS THAN TWO FEET, SO IT'S NOT VISIBLE, BUT AT THE SAME TIME, IT DOESN'T CAUSE ANY RUNOFF ISSUES WHICH BY THE WAY, I HAVE TO ADD THIS IS AT LEAST 700, 800 FEET OR MAYBE EVEN MORE SO INTO OUR DEVELOPMENT, WHICH WE HAVE FILTER FABRIC FENCE, WHICH IS MONITORED BY STORMWATER SOLUTION EVERY WEEK BY EPA'S REQUIREMENT.

WE ARE NOT CAUSING ANY EROSION INTO ANY PUBLIC ROADS IT JUST SOMEBODY'S PERCEPTION OF THIS HIGH ARE THEY BUILDING THIS HIGH? NO. THIS IS A TEMPORARY STOCKPILE THAT WAS PLACED THERE FOR CHANGE OF TRUCK.

THAT'S ALL IT WAS.

>> WELL, I APPRECIATE THAT.

>> THANK YOU.

>> IN MY PERSPECTIVE BECAUSE I SEE CONSTRUCTION ALL THE TIME OR WORK IN A CHEMICAL PLANT AND WE'RE BUILDING ALL THE TIME, SO I SEE THIS ALL THE TIME STUFF BEING MOVED AND YOU GOT TO HAVE LAID DOWN YARD, YOU HAVE TO HAVE PLACES TO STORE STUFF AND I GET IT.

I APPRECIATE THAT YOU HAVE DONE LEAPS AND BOUNDS SINCE LAST TUESDAY.

>> THANK YOU.

>> TO START A PLAN TO TRY TO BECAUSE I KNOW IT'S COSTING YOU MORE MONEY NOW BUT TO DEVELOP A PLAN TO GET THAT STOCKPILE TAKE CARE BECAUSE OF THE EYESORE THAT PEOPLE THOUGHT WAS GOING TO AFFECT THEM BECAUSE OF RAIN OR DRAINAGE, WHICH YOU'RE RESOLVING BECAUSE THAT'S EVENTUALLY GOING TO BE HOUSES THERE AT SOME POINT WHERE YOUR STOCK POINT IS GOING TO BE A SUBPART OF THE SUBDIVISION.

I APPRECIATE THAT YOU'VE GONE THROUGH LEAPS AND BOUNDS, IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT WE'VE HAD RAINY DAYS AND WE GOT TWO MORE COMING IN THE NEXT FIVE THAT I SAW ON THE WEATHER BEFORE I CAME TO COUNSEL, SO THAT'S GOING TO PUSH YOU BACK A LITTLE BIT.

WE HAVE TO GO ALSO AS YOU'RE WORD, YOU'VE DEVELOPED A PLAN YOU'VE TALKED TO JOHN AND YOU'VE COMMUNICATED WITH OTIS THAT YOU'RE MOVING FORWARD TO RECTIFY THE SITUATION THAT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION.

I SAY THANK YOU FOR DOING THAT FOR US SIR. I APPRECIATE IT.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR.

>> LET ME GET A HANDLE OF YOUR WORD.

WHERE THIS STOCKPILE DIRTY IS, IS IT ON SECTION 3 LOTS?

[02:10:01]

>> I HAVE A LAYOUT HERE THAT I COULD SHOW YOU.

>> JUST GENERALLY, IS IT ON SECTION 3 LOT?

>> ITS END OF SECTION 3 LOTS NEXT TO A DRAINAGE CHANNEL THAT WE HAVE.

UNFORTUNATELY, I DON'T HAVE THAT.

I HAVE TO GO MANUAL ON THESE TO LET YOU KNOW.

>> IT'S OKAY TO GO OLD SCHOOL.

>> SORRY.

>> THIS IS HENDERSON.

>> YES, SIR.

>> THIS IS THE CHAIR.

>> YES, SIR.

>> SECTION 3 IN BLUE AND IT STOCKPILES ALONG THIS AREA, THE DETENTION CHANNEL.

IT'S AT LEAST 1,000 FEET IF IT'S NOT ANYMORE, A STOCKPILE IS AROUND HERE.

WHAT HAPPENED WAS THEY BROUGHT IN THERE WERE SOME BEAMS DUE TO CONSTRUCTION OF THE DRAINAGE SWALE WHILE BACK THEY UTILIZE THAT AND THERE WERE SOME STOCKPILE LEFTOVER FROM SECTION 1.

THEY STARTED PUTTING THAT IN THE LAW SO THEY BUILT UP ALL THESE LOTS.

>> YES, SIR.

>> BUT AT THE SAME TIME THEY NEEDED A HAUL ROAD, SO THEY DID NOT PLACE THE FIELD AROUND HERE THEY SAID, WE THIS STOCKPILE FOR FINISHING OUR SANITARY AND STORM AND AFTER THE WATER, WE WILL JUST FINE TUNE THE LOTS.

THEN AT THE SAME TIME, BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO HAVE THIS AWAY FROM THE ROAD RIGHT AWAY, THIS WAS THE BEST PLACE FOR THEM TO PUT IT.

AT THE SAME TIME THIS IS SECTION 2, WHICH HAS A MORE STRINGENT DELIVERY TIME.

IT'S LIKE 90% FINISHED, WITH EXCEPTION TO THAT.

SO WHEN CITY TOLD US THAT DO NOT USE COUNTY ROAD SOUTH TO THE HENDERSON BECAUSE OF THE DAMAGES HE IMMEDIATELY TURNED, THERE WAS A COUPLE OF INCIDENT THAT THE TRUCK DRIVERS DID NOT LISTEN TO, BUT THAT'S RECTIFIED.

WE ARE USING A TEMPORARY DRIVEWAY, WHICH WE HAD INITIALLY SELECTED THIS ROOM, THIS AREA AFTER SECTION 2, SO THAT IT HELPS US WITH THE REMAINING SECTIONS.

TEXAS DOT CAME AND TOLD US NO BECAUSE OF THE SITE DISTANCE AND HOW THE FN523 IS CURVED.

THIS IS THE AREA THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ALLOWING YOU TO PUT RIGHT ON THE BEGINNING OF SECTION 2 SO IT DIDN'T HELP US BECAUSE THAT HAS TO BE BROUGHT INTO ALL THESE SECTIONS.

THAT'S ABOUT 120,000 CUBIC YARD OF DATA AND IF YOU DIVIDE THAT BY SEVEN PER TRUCK, THAT'S MORE THAN 27,000 TRUCKS TO BRING ALL THESE DIRT.

>> WHERE ARE YOU TAKING THIS DIRT THAT I'M LOOKING AT RIGHT HERE?

>> THIS DIRT IS GOING TO BE PLACED IN FUTURE SECTIONS 6 WHICH IS THE CLOSER PROXIMITY.

>> AREA THERE.

>> YES. THEN WORK IN THEIR WAY BACKUP BECAUSE RIGHT NOW THE REASON THAT THIS STATE WAS SITTING HERE WAS TO ALLOW HAUL TRUCK TO ENTER HERE.

BUT SINCE THEY CANNOT USE COUNTY ROAD 48 ANYMORE TO DOWNSIDE TO HENDERSON SO BASICALLY THERE'S NO ACCESSING FROM THIS SIDE.

THEY HAVE TO PLACE THIS HERE AND UTILIZE THE SAME AREA FROM THE NORTH AND BRING THE EXTRA DIRT TO HERE.

THIS SHALL NOT LAST AS I MENTIONED, THREE WORKING DAYS ON A DRY CONDITION. THANK YOU.

>> MAY I MOVE WE APPROVE THE FINAL PART WHEN GROWS GREEN SECTION 3, CONTINGENT UPON HIM MOVING THE BALANCE OF THIS OVERBURDEN ALL FOR SECTION 3 WITHIN, I DON'T HAVE A GOOD ENOUGH CRYSTAL BALL OR BUILDING IS GOING TO RAIN WITHIN A WEEK.

>> MAY I SUGGEST THAT I CAN SEND PICTURES BEFORE THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.

>> I DON'T WANT TO HOLD YOU UP. GET THE DIRT DONE, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE SITE YOU CAN START CONSTRUCTION ON SECTION 3.

>> TEN DAYS.

>> TEN DAYS FOR PN.

>> I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH HAVE A SECOND.

>> I'LL SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GONGORA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING? NONE. I'LL CALL ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED SAME SOUND..

>> AYE.

>> SOUNDS LIKE WAS IT A FOUR TWO.

>> FOUR TWO.

>> FOUR TWO, THAT MOTION DOES CARRY. THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.

JUST KEEP IN CONTACT WITH MR. OTIS AND THEY'LL KEEP US IN CONTACT WITH COUNCIL.

[02:15:03]

>> YES, SIR.

>> THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR COOPERATION.

ITEM NUMBER 14, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT,

[14. Discussion, and possible action on a Development Agreement (D.A.) for Ashland Development located north of Anchor Rd., East of FM521, and west of SH 288, ANGLETON, TEXAS, between the City of Angleton and ANCHOR HOLDINGS MP, LLC and WILDROCK HOLDINGS, LLC for approximately 879.9 acres of land located in the City’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (“ETJ”).]

ALSO KNOWN AS DA FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED NORTH OF ANCHOR ROAD EAST OF FM 521 AND WEST OF SOUTH HIGHWAY 288 ANGLETON, TEXAS BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND ANCHOR HOLDINGS, MP, LLC AND WILDROCK HOLDINGS, LLC, FOR APPROXIMATELY 879.9 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED IN THE CITIES EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION ETJ. OTIS.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL JUST INTRODUCE THE COVER FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, AS YOU KNOW, WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AGAIN HERE, PROBABLY OVER SIX MONTHS NOW.

IT PRE-DATED ME, BUT IT HAS BEEN A MOVING DOCUMENT AS WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THE ASHLYN DEVELOPMENT.

I WILL SAY THAT ALL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED BY THE COUNCIL, WE'RE CONTINGENT UPON THE DA BEING APPROVED, SO STAFF HAD TO, OF COURSE, DELAY ANY TYPE OF FINAL ACTIVITY BEFORE THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAD BEEN CONSIDERED BY COUNCIL.

WHAT I'LL DO IS I'LL OUTLINE THE VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE'LL TOUCH ON THIS EVENING OF COURSE, MR. RICH, ATTORNEY FOR THE DEVELOPER, IS HERE TO OF COURSE SPEAK IN MORE DETAIL IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY ARE PRESENTING TO YOU, COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

THEN OUR CITY ENGINEER AND STAFF ARE HERE TO ADDRESS ANY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS THAT WE'VE BEEN DISCUSSING, SUCH AS PARKLAND DEVELOPMENT, DRAINAGE QUESTIONS, AND THEN ALSO THE LOTMIX OF THE DEVELOPMENT IN TERMS OF HOW THE USES THIS WOULD BE DISPERSED ON THE PROPERTY AND THEN THE VARIOUS PHASES WITHIN THEIR PHASING PLAN.

IF YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SEE THE RED LINES OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, YOU WILL SEE A LOT OF ACTIVITY BEING CIRCULATED BETWEEN LEGAL DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PARKS, RECREATION TO SEE THE ENGINEER AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

AS I STATED IN THE SUMMARY THERE, AS YOU SEE THE CHART, IT DEALT WITH THE LOTMIX, WHICH WAS A CONCERN BY COUNCIL THAT WE NOT ONLY CONCENTRATE ON THE 50-FOOT LOTS, BUT ALSO SHOW A VARIETY OF HOUSING TYPES.

THEY'VE GIVEN YOU A LOT MORE DETAIL THAT YOU'LL SEE IN THE SUMMARY IN TERMS OF PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE VARIOUS HOUSING TYPES AND THEN THEY PUT THE MAXIMUM OF THE 50-FOOT LOTS, 542-POTENTIAL LOTS ON 50-FOOT LOTS.

THEN IN THE OTHER CATEGORIES, 249 WOULD BE THE MINIMUMS SO WE CAN DISCUSS THAT LATER.

THEN SOME OTHER REFERENCE TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON RENTAL COMMUNITY LIMITATIONS ARE PLACED WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AS YOU'LL SEE IN THE COVER, REGARDING THE PARKLAND DEDICATION, OUR PARKS DIRECTOR, AS WELL AS STAFF HAS SAID AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE PROPOSAL, WHICH DOES INCLUDE THE 250 OR SO APPROXIMATELY ACRES THAT DEALT WITH OPEN GREEN SPACE AND ALSO SOME PARK AND GREEN TRAIL ACTIVITY TO SATISFY WHAT THEY WOULD CALL THEIR COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING PARK AND OPEN SPACE AMENITIES TO THE SITE.

THE DIRECTOR HAS OF COURSE, STATED THAT ALTHOUGH THE DEVELOPMENT IS IN THE ETJ, HAD THIS BEEN WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, IT WOULD NOT FULLY SATISFY THE PARKLAND DEDICATION CODE.

BUT HOWEVER, WHAT WE DID WAS WE LOOKED AT THE AMENITIES THAT THEY ARE PROVIDING AS AN OPTION FOR COUNCIL TO DECIDE ON.

THOSE THINGS ARE PROVIDED HERE, SO A RECOMMENDATION DID COME FROM PARKS AND REC REGARDING CONSIDERATION FOR PARK AND LOU CONTRIBUTION AS A RESULT TO THEM NOT FULLY COMPLYING.

THE DEVELOPER WILL, AND THE ATTORNEY WILL COME IN AND DISCUSS THE AMENITIES ON HOW THEY ARE PROPOSING TO DEDICATE ABOUT $5 MILLION SPENDING TO DO THESE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE AMENITIES THAT ARE LISTED IN THE CHART ON THE NEXT PAGE, IF YOU WOULD FLIP THERE, WHICH OUTLINES THE VARIOUS ACRES DEALING WITH THE DETENTION POND AND THE TRAIL SYSTEM THAT WOULD LOOP IN AND AROUND THOSE PARTICULAR COMPONENTS OF THE SITES AND ALSO THE PARK AMENITIES, THE AMENITIES CENTER, ALL OF THOSE DETAILS ARE WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THEN WE'LL MOVE ON TO OTHER CITY FACILITIES THAT ARE RECOMMENDED IN THE DA SUCH AS THE PARCEL DEALING WITH THE STORAGE TANK,

[02:20:08]

ELEVATED STORAGE TANK, THE FUTURE WATER PLANT, 1.5 ACRES FOR THE FIRE STATION, AS WE TALKED ABOUT EARLIER IN THE PROCESS, AND ALSO THE PARCEL, WHICH WOULD OF COURSE HOSTS THE WELCOME SIGN INTO THE CITY OF ANGLETON.

THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, OF COURSE, WOULD BE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON IN TERMS OF THE LOCATION IN THE CITY, AND THEN THEY ALSO WOULD TALK ABOUT THE FIRE PROTECTION ENTITY AND HOW THAT WOULD, OF COURSE BE HANDLED IN THE FUTURE.

LATER ON IN THE DOCUMENT, YOU'LL SEE DISCUSSIONS ON THE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN STANDARDS IN WHICH THE DEVELOPER HAS COMMITTED TO A CERTAIN LEVEL OF AESTHETICS ON THE RESIDENTIAL SIDE BEING THAT THE FRONT FACADE AT THE HOMES WOULD BE 100% BRICK, AND THEN ON THE SIDES, THE LIMITATION OF 75% ON THE MASONRY MATERIALS, AND THEN THE SECONDARY FINISHES, WOULD ALSO BE OUTLINED THERE.

IF YOU WOULD ROLL FURTHER, THEY ACTUALLY SHOW YOU THE HOUSING TYPES IN TERMS OF TYPICAL VIEWS HERE, IN TERMS OF THE ACTIVE ADULT SINGLE-FAMILY STRUCTURES, AS YOU SEE THERE, YOU CAN ZOOM IN A LITTLE BIT.

THE PATIO HOME EXAMPLES ARE SHOWN, AS WELL AS THE TOWN HOME.

IF YOU KEEP ROLLING THERE, TOWN HOME EXAMPLE WITH THE ATTACHED LIVING IS SHOWN AT THE BOTTOM THERE, AND THEN THE SCHOOL EXAMPLES WHICH SHOW THE CHARACTER OF THE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT ON THE NEXT SLIDES.

WITH THAT BEING SAID, THEIR PROPOSAL IS TO PROVIDE US WITH AN ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINE DOCUMENT IN WHICH STAFF WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW, AND THEN WE WOULD WORK WITH THE HOA TO ASSURE THAT ANY FUTURE COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES WOULD COME INTO THE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME CHARACTER AS YOU SEE HERE ON THE SCHOOLS THERE.

THEN WE WOULD WEIGH THOSE GUIDELINES AND MAKE SURE THEY'RE COMPARABLE IN TERMS OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO COMMIT TO IN THE DA.

ALSO IN THE DA WILL TALK ABOUT HERE A SIGNAGE IN WHICH THEY WILL SUBMIT TO STAFF A MASTER ASSIGN PLAN IN WHICH WE WOULD HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE SURE IT MEETS OUR MINIMUM STANDARDS AND THAT THERE IS CONSISTENCY THROUGHOUT SO WITHIN THE DOCUMENT AND ALSO THEIR ATTACHMENT AND EXHIBITS, THEY ACTUALLY SHOW THE MONUMENT SIGN TYPES AND WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE AS WELL.

WE'VE PUSHED BACK WITH THE APPLICANT IN TERMS OF SITE PLAN OVERSIGHT, THEY'VE GIVEN STAFF SOME LEVEL OF REVIEW AND APPROVAL IN THE PROCESS, IS AS WE WOULD SEE, COMMERCIAL SITE PLANS BEING PRESENTED TO THE CITY, ALTHOUGH IT'S IN THE ETJ, THEY DID ALLOW US SOME LEVEL OF REVIEW AND CAPABILITY OF APPROVAL.

WE TALKED EARLIER ABOUT THE ROAD FACILITY CONSTRUCTION.

THEY HAVE EXHIBITS WHICH WOULD SHOW YOU THE CROSS SECTIONS IN TERMS OF WHAT THE THOROUGHFARE ROADS ON THE EAST-WEST CONNECTIONS WOULD BE BUILT TO COUNTY'S STANDARDS AND MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY, COLLECTOR ROADS WOULD BE BUILT TO THE COUNTY STANDARDS WITH THE WIDER PAVEMENT, BUT THEY WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE MUD, OF COURSE AND THEN THERE WOULD BE LANDSCAPE RESERVES SHOWN ON EACH SIDE OF THOSE CORRIDORS, SO THERE'S A TYPICAL SECTION, I THINK IN THOSE EXHIBITS.

IN TERMS OF LOCAL ROADS, THEY DID INCREASE THE SUBGRADE FROM SIX INCHES TO EIGHT INCHES AS REQUESTED, AND THOSE WOULD BE MARKED AND MAINTAIN AS WELL.

WE TALKED ABOUT THE TOWN CENTER, POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT THAT COULD OCCUR NEAR 288, BUT AS YOU KNOW, FUTURE DISCUSSIONS AND AGREEMENTS HAVE TO BE MADE WITH TEXT-DOT AND THE CITY WOULD OF COURSE PARTICIPATE IN THAT.

THEY PUT SOME DAT-TIME THRESHOLDS HERE IN WHICH THE DEVELOPER WILL DISCUSS WITH YOU IN TERMS OF THAT TWO-YEAR PERIOD THAT THEY WOULD ATTEMPT TO DEVELOP A COMMERCIAL TRACKS INSTEAD OF RESIDENTIAL BUT WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT AS WELL.

WE DO HAVE THE EXPERTS IN THE ROOM TO DEAL WITH SOME OF THE TECHNICAL ISSUES ON BOTH SIDES IN TERMS OF STAFF AS WELL AS THE DEVELOPMENT, THE DEVELOPER, AS WELL AS THE ATTORNEY, FOR THE DEVELOPER WILL DISCUSS THOSE THINGS, AND THEN IN THE FUTURE, THERE WOULD BE THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT, WHICH WOULD DEAL WITH OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE COUNTY AND ALSO THE MUD IN TERMS OF MAKING SURE THAT THE PROMISES THAT ARE MADE ARE KEPT.

[02:25:05]

I'LL END HERE TO HAND IT OFF WITH PERMISSION OF THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL TO THE APPLICANT AND THEN JUDICIARY, IF YOU WANT TO.

>> I JUST HAVE ONE COMMENT AND I'LL LET MR. MOLLER CLARIFY THIS.

BUT I BELIEVE THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE HOMES ARE THE NON-TRADITIONAL HOMES ONLY YOU DO NOT HAVE PHOTOGRAPHS OF WHAT THE SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ARE GOING TO LOOK LIKE.

I WAS NOT HERE FOR THAT MEETING, I THINK PROBABLY IN THEIR PREVIOUS PRESENTATION.

YOU'VE SEEN WHAT THOSE LOOK LIKE, BUT I DIDN'T WANT YOU TO GET CONFUSED THAT I INSISTED ON SOME THINGS THAT YOU COULD SEE WHAT NON-TRADITIONAL LOANS LOOK LIKE AND SO THEY PROVIDED THOSE PHOTOS.

>> THANK YOU. CHRIS.

>> I THINK IN THE PARKLAND-DEDICATION-VERSUS-FEES, I WOULD AIR TOWARD THE SIDE OF COLLECTING FEES BECAUSE I DON'T THINK WE CAN NECESSARILY ALL AGREE WHAT THE STANDARD IS AND WHAT THE REQUIREMENT IS.

AS WE'VE DONE WITH PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTS COLLECTING THE FEES WOULD, I THINK BE MORE APPROPRIATE, WHICH ALLOWS US TO USE IT FOR CURRENT NEEDS AND WISHES FOR OTHER PARKS IN ANGLETON.

>> SIR. THANK YOU.

>> THEIR PROPOSED AMOUNT WILL BE DISCUSSED IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING TO THE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE LEGAL TEAM ON THE APPLICANT SIDE, WE'LL DISCUSS THAT WITH THE COUNCIL AS WELL.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU. WE'LL LET I GUESS MR. MOLLER COME UP.

>> GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

WE'VE DONE THIS A COUPLE OF TIMES, AND SO I WON'T DO A PRESENTATION.

IF YOU ALL WANT TO JUST JUMP RIGHT INTO THE QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS YOU HAVE.

I DO WANT TO MAKE ONE COMMENT ABOUT THE PARKLAND.

WELL, IF THERE'S CONFUSION, LET US GET OUR SIDE OF IT OUT.

AS I READ YOUR ORDINANCE, THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL REQUIRE 70-90 ACRES OF PARKLAND AND ROUGHLY $5-$6 MILLION DOLLARS WORTH OF SPENDING TO MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS.

OUR AMENITY PACKAGE BUDGET, INCLUDING BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, IS $13 MILLION AND WE'RE GOING TO DEDICATE SOMEWHERE NORTH OF 200 ACRES FOR OPEN SPACE THAT'S AVAILABLE FOR EVERYBODY.

THE WAY YOU'RE ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN, PARK STAFF CAN'T MAKE A DETERMINATION AS TO WHAT MEETS AND DOESN'T MEET UNTIL YOU ACTUALLY HAVE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.

FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, I DON'T CARE HOW YOU SCORE IT, WE ARE FAR EXCEEDING WHAT YOU'RE ORDINANCE WOULD REQUIRE.

IT'S JUST MECHANICALLY, YOU'RE ORDINANCE DOES NOT ALLOW ANYBODY TO MAKE THE CONCLUSION THAT YOU'VE SATISFIED IT UNTIL IT'S ALL BUILT.

WE'RE NOT PROPOSING TO BUILD LESS THAN WHAT YOU WOULD REQUIRE, WE'RE ACTUALLY BUILDING A WHOLE LOT MORE.

I'M HAPPY TO TALK ABOUT ANY OF THE OTHER POINTS YOU ALL WANT TO TALK ABOUT.

WE'VE DONE PRESENTATION TO BUNCH, I DON'T KNOW THAT WE NEED TO BELABOR ALL THE POINTS.

OTIS HAS DONE A FINE JOB, I THINK, SUMMARIZING THE MAJOR POINTS OF THE AGREEMENT.

AS WE WERE WALKING IN HERE, WE WERE JUST LIKE, I DON'T KNOW HOW WE CAN COMPLEMENT YOUR STAFF IN A WAY THAT DOESN'T MAKE US LOOK LIKE WE'VE GOTTEN JUST BEAT UP, BUT YOUR STAFF HAS DONE A GREAT JOB OF PROTECTING THE INTERESTS OF THE CITY.

YOU HAVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEFORE YOU THAT I THINK IS VERY THOROUGH.

I THINK WE'VE ACTUALLY BEEN GOING THROUGH DRAFTS FOR MORE THAN A YEAR NOW AND THEY HAVE DONE THEIR JOB VERY WELL.

THEY HAVE BEEN VERY PROFESSIONAL ABOUT IT AND WE APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK WITH THEM AND WE'VE GIVEN YOU ALL WHAT WE THINK IS A VERY GOOD DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR WHAT WILL BE A VERY GOOD DEVELOPMENT.

>> THANK YOU, SIR.

>> QUICK QUESTION, MILLION DOLLARS, HOW MUCH IS BEING SPENT ON THE RESORT-STYLE POOL, LAZY RIVER, JUNIOR OLYMPIC SWIMMING POOL, GRANDSTANDS, PLAYGROUND, COMMUNITY CENTER, PARKING LOT, AND SHADED ELEMENTS?

>> TRAVIS, DO YOU KNOW THE BREAKDOWN BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, BALLPARK?

[02:30:03]

>> THE AMENITY CENTER COMPLEX IS PROBABLY IN THE RANGE OF $2-$4 MILLION DOLLARS AND I BELIEVE THAT'S THE ONLY PRIVATE AMENITIES WE HAVE ON THE SIDE.

>> WOW. YOU CAN BUILD THAT FOR $2-$4 MILLION DOLLARS?

>> I DON'T HAVE MY ESTIMATE IN FRONT OF ME.

[OVERLAPPING]

>> WE JUST BUILT A PAVILION IN A PLAYGROUND AND THAT COSTS OVER THREE-AND-A-HALF.

>> YOU SAID $13 MILLION.

HOW MUCH IS THAT $2-$4 MILLION OUT OF THAT $13 MILLION? IT'S JUST A WIDE VARIETY TO ME. I DON'T KNOW.

MAYBE A COUPLE OF [OVERLAPPING] MILLION DOLLARS IS A BIG DEAL TO YOU ALL, I DON'T KNOW.

>> WHY DON'T WE SEE IF WE CAN GET THE ESTIMATE WHILE WE'RE SITTING HERE?

>> LET'S GO THROUGH THE OTHER STUFF. WE'LL SEE IF WE CAN GET THE CONSULTANT TO GIVE US THE ACTUAL BREAKDOWN, SO WE'RE NOT GUESSING.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING, AS FAR AS OUR PARKLAND DEDICATION, WHAT IS IT? FIFTY PERCENT THAT WE WILL ACCEPT CREDIT FOR?

>> THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT ANIMAL BECAUSE WE ARE WORKING WITH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

NORMALLY, WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT PARKLAND DEDICATION TO BE ACCEPTED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS YOU'RE FOLLOWING THE PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE TO A T. THE DEVELOPERS HAVE TRIED TO PUT A PRODUCT FORWARD THAT MEET SOME OF THEIR REQUIREMENTS, BUT IT DOESN'T ALL OF THEM.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO DISCUSS WHAT THAT IS, I CAN OUTLINE THOSE FOR YOU SO YOU HAVE A CLEAR PICTURE.

>> WOULD YOU, PLEASE?

>> SURE. THE PARKLAND DEDICATION PROPOSED WOULD NOT NECESSARILY COMPLY WITH WHAT THE CITY WOULD NORMALLY ACCEPT WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS, PRIMARILY DUE TO THE LAND REQUIREMENTS AND THE PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE.

SPECIFICALLY, IF YOU LOOK IN YOUR PACKET ON THE BREAKDOWN, THERE IS A 47.1-ACRE WETLAND NATURE PRESERVE, WHICH TYPICALLY WE WOULD CONSIDER AS UNSUITABLE FOR DEVELOPMENT.

THE 114.1 ACRES OF WETLAND DETENTION GENERALLY SHOULDN'T QUALIFY AS PARKLAND DEDICATION, BUT MAY BE ACCEPTED AS A DONATION, AS PARCELS THAT ARE ADJACENT TO PARKLAND DEDICATION, IF IT WERE IN THE CITY LIMITS.

YOU ALSO HAVE PARKLAND DEDICATION, SPECIFICALLY THE PRIVATE USE.

THIS IS GOING BACK TO WHAT YOU WERE SPEAKING TO, MARK.

WE HAVE A SECTION THAT IF IT IS HOA-MAINTAINED, ALL OF THOSE AMENITIES WOULD BE ACCEPTED AT 50% OF THAT COST, NOT 100% BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC.

THE WHOLE POINT OF PARKLAND DEDICATION IS A CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY TO BE ENJOYED FOR ALL [BACKGROUND] SO THAT'S WHY THAT IS A 50% CREDIT GIVEN.

THEN THE 10.4 ACRES THAT THEY HAVE PROPOSED AS A CITY PARK DEDICATION DOES INCLUDE A WATER AMENITY.

WE'RE ASSUMING THAT PART OF THAT, WHEN WE HAD SOME OF THESE PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS, I THINK IT WAS ABOUT 5.27, WAS AN ACTUAL PIECE OF LAND TO BE DEVELOPED INTO A PARK WITH A POND WITHIN IT.

WE'RE UNSURE IF THAT WAS DESIGNED FOR WHAT DETENTION, IF THAT WAS NEEDED FOR THE SITE, OR IF THAT WAS JUST AN AMENITY WITHIN THAT 10.4 ACRES OF DEDICATED PARKLAND.

TYPICALLY, THE CITY REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF FIVE ACRES FOR PARKLAND DEDICATION.

THAT IS SPECIFICALLY OUTLINED IN THE PARKLAND DEDICATION ORDINANCE FOR DEVELOPMENTS THAT ARE QUITE A BIT SMALLER THAN THIS, SO YOU MIGHT HAVE A DEVELOPMENT THAT IS PROPOSING 20 HOME SITES.

WELL, THEIR PARKLAND DEDICATION IS NOT GOING TO AMOUNT TO FIVE ACRES.

THE ALTERNATIVE WOULD BE TO SAY, WELL, UNFORTUNATELY, YOU DON'T HAVE ENOUGH LAND ON YOUR DEVELOPMENT TO CONVEY PARKLANDS, SO AS AN ALTERNATIVE, WE'RE GOING TO SAY YOU NEED TO PAY FEES IN LIEU OF PARKLAND DEDICATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

WITHIN THIS DEVELOPMENT IN PARTICULAR, LIKE RICK DID, LOUIS TOO, BASED ON THE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS, YOU'RE TALKING AROUND, ABOUT 89 ACRES OF PARKLAND THAT NEEDS TO BE CONVEYED AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC AND DEVELOPED.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT BREAKDOWN, YOU NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT LAND CAN BE UTILIZED FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES OR CONSIDER, IF NOT TO BE DEVELOPED, THEY COULD BE PASSIVE AREAS, IF YOU WILL.

THIS IS ALL UP TO YOU BECAUSE AGAIN, THIS IS UNIQUE, IT'S IN THE ETJ AND YOU CAN SPECIFY THIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

BUT WHAT YOU'RE AIMING FOR IS AN ACRE OF LAND IS TO SERVE EVERY 28 DWELLING UNITS,

[02:35:09]

SO YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A LITTLE UNDER 2,500 DWELLING UNITS.

THAT'S HOW YOU COME UP WITH THE NUMBER OF ACRES THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY.

ADDITIONALLY, THE ESTIMATE FOR A FEE IN LIEU IS AROUND A LITTLE OVER $6 MILLION, THAT IS BASED ON AN ASSUMED VALUE OF AN ACRE OF LAND BEING [NOISE] $20,000.

WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THE VALUE OF LAND IS BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE AN INDEPENDENT APPRAISAL FOR THIS PROPERTY.

THIS PROPERTY CURRENTLY DOES HAVE EXEMPTIONS, SO THIS IS AN ASSUMPTION AT THIS POINT IS AROUND $6 MILLION DOLLARS.

THEIR [NOISE] NOTE OF DEDICATING AND CONVEYING THE LAND AND THEN MAKING THOSE IMPROVEMENTS, THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THEY HAVE INCLUDED IN THERE.

AGAIN, GREAT QUESTION HOW IS IT BEING DISTRIBUTED WOULD BE ONE OF MY QUESTIONS ALSO, BUT THEY ARE NOTING THAT THEY ARE PLANNING TO PUT A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF MONEY ON THE TABLE FOR SOME OF THESE DEVELOPMENTS, SO THAT'S SOMETHING TO CONSIDER ALSO.

SOME OTHER BENEFITS THAT THEY HAVE PROPOSED ARE THAT THE SUBDIVISION, WHILE IT DOES INCLUDE THE WET DETENTION, IF YOU LOOK AND BREAK DOWN SOME OF THESE SECTIONS THAT NORMALLY WOULD BE THERE, REGARDLESS, LIKE THE WETLAND AREA, THE 47-ISH ACRE TRACK, I THINK ON THE NORTHERN SIDE, WHAT NORMALLY WOULD HAVE AND WAS IN PRELIMINARY PLANS ARE, DRY DETENTION THEY'VE AMMENITIZED TO A WET DETENTION.

THEY DON'T HAVE TO ADD CONCRETE TRAILS, THEY'VE PROPOSED THAT IN THEIR PLAN. WHAT ELSE? THE MAINTENANCE OF THOSE WET DETENTION.

ONCE IT'S CONVEYED OVER TO THE CITY IN THE AGREEMENT THEY HAVE SPECIFIED THAT THE DEVELOPMENT WILL CONTINUE TO MAINTAIN THE WET DETENTION, WHICH AGAIN, THE CITY DOESN'T WANT TO GET IN THE BUSINESS OF FIVE POND MANAGEMENTS ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF TOWN IN ADDITION TO LAKESIDE PARK, SO THAT COULD BE CONSIDERED A BENEFIT TO THE CITY.

THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS, WHILE SOME OF THEM AREN'T OPEN TO THE PUBLIC, A MAJORITY OF THEM WOULD BE.

THOSE ARE THINGS TO CONSIDER AND THEN ALSO GIVING CONSIDERATION TO THE ADDITIONAL FEE.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO INCORPORATE THAT ENTITY AGREEMENT OUTSIDE OF ALL OF THE THINGS THAT THEY'VE PROPOSED FOR THE PARKLAND DEDICATION.

THEY HAVE ALSO SAID THAT THEY WOULD CONSIDER ADDING ON AN ADDITIONAL FEE IN LIEU OF.

HOWEVER, WHAT I WILL SAY IS WHEN YOU LOOK AT ALL OF THOSE THINGS, WHAT IS IN THE BEST INTERESTS AND THE GREATER GOOD OF THE PUBLIC AND THE RESIDENTS OF ANGLETON WOULD YOU PREFER TO SPEND THE FEES IN LIEU OF AROUND SIX MILLION DOLLARS ACROSS A VARIETY OF PARKS OR DO YOU WANT TO SEE IT IN THIS ONE LOCATION THAT ANGLETON RESIDENTS CAN COME AND VISIT? THAT IS UP FOR YOU ALL TO DECIDE.

WE JUST WANT TO PRESENT ALL OF THE INFORMATION HERE.

SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU SHOULD NOTE TOO GOING BACK TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKELY SEE REGARDLESS, IS THE WETLAND RESERVE BECAUSE YOU CAN'T REALLY DEVELOP ON THAT.

THE DRY OR WET DETENTION, THEY MAY DECIDE TO MAKE IT DRY IF YOU DON'T CONSIDER THAT AS A PARK AMENITY AND THE PRIVATE HOA FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND.

THERE'S ALSO A NOTE ON THERE THAT'S ITEMIZED AS YOUR NATURE STREAMS. I WOULD ASSUME THIS IS AN ASSUMPTION THAT THAT IS PART OF THEIR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT.

I DON'T KNOW THAT, THAT HAS NOT BEEN CONFIRMED, BUT PLEASE TAKE ALL THOSE INTO CONSIDERATION.

REALLY BREAK DOWN THOSE NUMBERS WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE LAND THAT SHOULD BE DEDICATED AND THE FEES IN LIEU OF THAT YOU COULD POTENTIALLY SPREAD ACROSS ALL ANGLETON PARK SYSTEMS.

>> THANK YOU, MEGAN.

>> CAN WE GET THE PARK EXHIBIT UP ON THE SCREEN?

>> PAGE 209.

A FEW PAGES FARTHER DOWN.

>> YEAH, GO DOWN. AS HE'S DOING THAT, THERE'S THIS RUNNING JOKE IN OUR OFFICE THAT WHEN YOU SAY GO DOWN, HALF THE PEOPLE WILL SCROLL THE PAGE DOWN,

[02:40:03]

AND THEN THE OTHER PEOPLE WILL SCROLL IT UP TO GO TO THE BOTTOM OF THE PAGE.

I WAS JUST CURIOUS TO SEE.

>> I THINK IT'S LIKE 209.

>> THAT'S RIGHT. JUST CLICK RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF THAT AND GO UP TWO, I THINK, YEAH. MAYBE ONE MORE.

THAT'S CLOSE ENOUGH. I THINK MEGAN, TO GIVE YOU THE BEST FRAME OF REFERENCE, I GUESS IS SO IF WE JUST DID FEE IN LIEU OF WHICH BUT IF WE JUST SAID WE'RE JUST GOING TO WRITE A CHECK TO THE CITY AND NOT DO ANY PARKS IN OUR COMMUNITY.

THE CHECK WOULD BE SIX MILLION DOLLARS.

DID I GET THAT ROUGHLY SIX? WELL, OBVIOUSLY WE'VE GOT TO HAVE PARK AND REC FOR OUR COMMUNITY BECAUSE THEY'RE THE ONES THAT WE'VE GOT TO SERVE.

GOT ALL DONE IT. JUST BY FRAMING A REFERENCE, WRITING A CHECK FOR SIX MILLION AND BUILD NOTHING IS WHAT WOULD MEET YOUR REQUIREMENTS.

WE'RE DOING 13 MILLION PLUS 200 AND SOME ODD ACRES.

LOOK, I KNOW THAT THE ORDINANCE SAYS THAT YOU DON'T COUNT THE 42-ACRE NATURE PRESERVE, BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF PEOPLE THAT WOULD KILL TO HAVE A 42-ACRE NATURE PRESERVE THAT YOU COULD PUT TRAILS THROUGH AND THAT STUFF.

>> DOESN'T THAT ALREADY EXIST?

>> WHAT'S THAT?

>> DOES THE NATURE PRESERVE TECHNICALLY ALREADY EXIST?

>> IT WAS PRIVATE PROPERTY. IT COULD BE CLEARED, BUT IT'S NOT OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. I GUESS.

IF YOU TOOK WHAT WE PROPOSE, AND THE WAY THIS WORKS IS YOU HAVE THE NATURE PRESERVE.

OF COURSE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THE HIGH SCHOOL WITH THE BALL FIELDS HERE.

YOU'VE GOT THE DETENTION, THAT'S AMENITIZED, SO IT'S GOT LAKES INSTEAD OF DRY.

HERE'S THE FIVE ACRES THAT WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PARK.

THEN THIS LOOP TRAIL SYSTEM, I GUESS I'VE GOT IT SOMEWHERE.

IT'S MILES OF TRAILS THAT ARE ALL INTERCONNECTED.

IF YOU HAD THIS 282-ACRE PARK SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE, AND IT WAS JUST THE PARK FACILITIES THAT YOU SEE THERE, YOU'D BE THRILLED TO HAVE THAT IN YOUR COMMUNITY.

BECAUSE WE DID IT IN A WAY THAT IS ALL INTERCONNECTED AND SO YOU CAN GO FROM HERE AND I SAY YOU, ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC COULD COME IN.

THEY COULD START HERE.

THEY CAN HIKE HERE, HERE, GO UP HERE. ALL THAT.

IF IT WAS A STAND-ALONE FACILITY, IT WOULD BE ONE OF THE COOLEST PARKS IN THE REGION.

THAT'S BECAUSE WE NOT ONLY SAID THAT WE'RE GOING TO DEDICATE THE LAND, BUT WE'RE COMMITTED TO SPEND I THINK THE AGREEMENT SAYS FIVE PLUS MILLION DOLLARS ON IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT.

TO THE PUBLIC PARK AREA.

ON TOP OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO FOR THE AMENITY CENTER, WHICH WE GOT THE NUMBER, IT'S 3.8 MILLION IS THE CURRENT ESTIMATE FOR THE AMENITY CENTER.

I THINK WE'RE GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND ON PARKS, WE HAVE AGREED TO DO IN ADDITION TO ALL OF THAT, ANOTHER 807,000 THAT WOULD BE PAID TO THE CITY.

WE'RE AT, $14 MILLION AND THAT DOESN'T EVEN COUNT THE LAND COSTS.

I THINK WE'RE DOING PLENTY.

I HOPE YOU ALL WILL AGREE.

IT DOES NOT FIT SQUARELY WITHIN YOUR ORDINANCE BECAUSE YOU'RE ORDINANCE, QUITE FRANKLY, IS NOT DESIGNED TO DEAL WITH A LARGE LOOKING AT IT HOLISTICALLY.

IT'S JUST NOT.

WE'RE ASKING YOU TO ACCEPT THAT THIS IS SUFFICIENT FOR YOUR PARK REQUIREMENT WITH THE ADDITION OF THE PAYMENT OF THE $250 PER LOT TO THE CITY THAT YOU ALL CAN USE FOR WHATEVER.

>> I DON'T HAVE IT WRITTEN DOWN IN FRONT OF ME, BUT FIVE POINT SOMETHING MILLION FOR THE GENERAL OVERALL LAYOUT, LOGGING PADS, AND STUFF LIKE THAT, AND THEN ANOTHER 3.8 MILLION, I BELIEVE, IS WHAT YOU CALLED IT FOR THE FACILITIES.

THAT'S ROUGHLY WORTH NINE MILLION?

>> THE FIVE MILLION IS A MINIMUM.

I'M JUST TELLING YOU WHAT'S IN THERE, THE BUDGET IS 13.

>> BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO SPEND 13?

>> IT DOESN'T MEAN WE'RE REQUIRED TO SPEND 13.

I'M JUST TELLING YOU IT'S IN THEIR CURRENT BUDGET.

>> OKAY.

>> WHAT WE'RE REQUIRED TO SPEND IS FIVE MILLION PLUS THE ROUGHLY MILLION WE WOULD PAY TO THE CITY IF WE DO THE PARK FEE.

[02:45:03]

>> EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND.

>> I HAVEN'T DONE THE MATH, SO SOMEBODY CAN PROBABLY PUT THAT MATH TOGETHER.

>> WHAT WAS THE AMOUNT YOU'RE GOING TO PAY THE CITY? EIGHT HUNDRED THOUSAND?

>> IT'S 250 PER LOT, SO TIMES.

>> IT'S LIKE 890,000.

>> THAT'S BASED ON A $350 CALCULATION.

WE CALCULATED IT AS $350 TIMES 2,487 HOUSES, WHICH IS 870,000.

>> ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE A TENNIS COURT?

>> TENNIS COURT.

>> IT'S NOT CURRENTLY PLANNED, BUT WE'RE OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS.

>> ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE A SOCCER FIELD?

>> NOT IN THE CURRENT PLANS, BUT OPEN TO SUGGESTIONS.

>> YOU SEE WHERE I'M GOING WITH THIS? YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE 2,487 HOUSES.

MOST OF OUR PARKS HAVE THE AMENITIES THAT YOURS JUST DON'T.

THEY'RE GOING TO GO SOMEWHERE.

THEY'RE GOING TO COME TO OUR PARKS.

THE POINT IS, I AGREE.

YOU'RE PUTTING IN A GREAT PRODUCT OVER THERE.

YOU'RE PUTTING IN A LOT OF PARKS AND I WOULD SAY THAT SOME CITIZENS ARE PROBABLY GOING TO GO OVER THERE.

BUT YOU'RE DOING IT BECAUSE IT'S ATTRACTIVE FOR YOUR DEVELOPMENT.

NO OTHER REASON WHY YOU WOULD DO IT, OTHERWISE YOU WOULDN'T DO IT.

>> THAT'S NOT TRUE. WHAT WE HAVE PUT INTO THIS PLAN IS WAY MORE THAN WE ORIGINALLY STARTED BECAUSE YOUR STAFF INSISTED THAT WE INCREASE OUR PARK.

>> IF WE ASK FOR SIX MILLION DOLLARS, YOU'RE NOT DEVELOPING THE REST OF THOSE PARKS?

>>WE WOULD NOT AGREE TO PAY YOU SIX MILLION DOLLARS, NO.

>> IF WE ASK FOR THAT AS A CONDITION OF THIS, YOU WOULD WALK AWAY FROM THIS DEAL?

>> WE WOULD NOT DO ANY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRED US TO PAY SIX MILLION DOLLARS TO THE CITY. NO.

>> WELL, WHAT IF WE STOOD FIRM AND SO WE WANT SIX MILLION DOLLARS?

>> WE WILL DEVELOP WITHOUT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

>> YOU PUT A NUMBER TO HOW MANY ACRES OF DRY DETENTION YOU HAVE JUST OFF THE CUFF?

>> ZERO.

>> OPTIMUM PLACES TO PUT SOCCER FIELD?

>> WELL, UNTIL THEY FLOOD.

>> WELL, YOU ARE NOT GOING TO PLAY IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RAIN EITHER SO THAT'S.

>> WE'VE DONE SOME OF THAT. WE'VE DONE DOG PARKS IN DRY DETENTION BASINS, WE'VE DONE SOCCER FIELDS IN DRY DETENTION BASINS.

THE PROBLEM WITH DOING A SOCCER FIELD IN A PLACE THAT FLOODS IS THAT WHEN IT DOES FLOOD AND IT'S SHUT DOWN FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME, ANYBODY WHO'S GOT A SEASON, OR WHO'S GOT SCHEDULED PRACTICES, THEY'VE GOTTEN NO WHERE TO GO AND YOU CAN'T MAKE THAT UP, I MEAN, LOOK, IF YOU'D PREFER US TO CONVERT ONE OF THESE PONDS FROM A WET DETENTION TO A DRY DETENTION AND PUT A SOCCER FIELD IN WE CAN TALK ABOUT THAT.

>> I'LL JUST DOING THAT AFTER.

>> I MEAN.

>> I'VE COACHED BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL FOR NUMEROUS YEARS AND SENT THE KIDS HOME BECAUSE IT'S TOO WET ON THE BALL FIELD AND IT WASN'T IN THE MIDDLE OF DETENTION PONDS.

>> I DID FOOTBALL AND SOFTBALL MYSELF FOR A LOT OF YEARS.

>> IT'S BRAZORIA COUNTY AND IT GETS WET.

>> IT GETS WET. BECAUSE SHE SAID IF IT'S NOT COLD AND RAINY, IT'S NOT SOCCER SEASON.

YEAH, I AGREE WITH YOU. IT'S LIKE SOCCER IS ACTUALLY ONE OF THOSE SPORTS THAT THE SEASON JUST DOESN'T AGREE WITH THE DRY DETENTION FIELD.

>> YEAH. I MEAN, HOW MANY ACRES DO YOU NEED, IF YOU WOULD PUT FOUR SOCCER FIELDS TOGETHER, HOW MANY ACRES DO YOU NEED? ANYBODY KNOW?

>> I MEAN, I WOULDN'T ASK YOU TO PUT A SOCCER FIELD IN.

>> I'M SAYING YOUR KIDS ARE GOING TO BE COMING TO THE PARKS THAT HAVE OUR AMENITIES THERE.

THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING, HOW COULD YOU HELP US IMPROVE OUR PARKS FOR 2,487 HOMES? HAVING KIDS, PLAYING LITTLE LEAGUE, SOFTBALL, SOCCER.

TONIGHT, WE JUST SAID WE'RE GOING TO REFER SOME TENNIS COURTS.

THAT WAS A BIG EXPENSE FOR US.

>> YES. I THINK WE'VE SAID THAT WE WOULD PAY ALMOST $900,000.

WHICH AGAIN, IF YOU GO TO LOOK AT THE SIX MILLION, THAT'S ONE-SIXTH OF WHAT A COMPLETE FEE IN LIEU OF WOULD HAVE BEEN AND WE'RE DOING ALL THIS STUFF ON TIME.

>> ONE BASEBALL FIELD IS CLOSE TO A MILLION DOLLARS NOW.

THE SENIOR LEAGUE FIELD IS OVER A MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE LAST ESTIMATE. JUST SAYING.

>> YEAH, I MEAN, TO ME, JOHN MAKES A GREAT POINT AND I THINK THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT OF THE DEDICATION OF FEES LIEU AND WHATEVER THAT TERMINOLOGY IS, I APOLOGIZE.

BUT WE ARE GOING TO BE POURING PEOPLE

[02:50:01]

INTO THE RESOURCES THAT WE HAVE AND THEN WE DID NOT TURN AROUND AND TAKE MONEY AND INVEST INTO THOSE SAME RESOURCES THAT IT'S GOING TO PUT US BEHIND THE EIGHT BALL, WHICH WE'RE ALWAYS, WE'RE ALWAYS DIGGING UP, SWIMMING UPSTREAM INTO.

>> POINT IN A PLC MEETING WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SOCCER FIELD.

WE HAVE A COUPLE OF FIELDS, BUT THEY'RE NOT UP TO STANDARD WHERE WE CAN USE THEM DURING MORNING STOCK.

>> NO LIGHTS.

>> SPENDING THAT MONEY ON THOSE UPGRADES WOULD BENEFIT THE ADDITIONAL USE AND THOSE THINGS.

>> WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO NEED BECAUSE WHEN YOU ARE SOCCER COMPLEXES IS CURRENTLY SATISFACTORY FOR THE POPULATION.

BUT IF WE ARE GOING TO GROW AS A CITY, WE WILL NEED LIGHTS TO START PRACTICES INTO THE EVENING SO YOU CAN HAVE YOUR 5:30 PRACTICE FOLLOWED BY YOUR WILL BECOME YOUR 6:45 OR SEVEN O'CLOCK PRACTICE.

IT'S WHAT THEY'RE DOING. LIKE JACKSON, YOU ONLY TAUGHT ME SO MUCH LAND AVAILABLE, SO YOU GOT TO STACK UP YOUR FIELDS JUST DAYLIGHT.

THE SAME THING GOES WITH BASEBALL.

>> LOOK AGAIN, WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS DESIGNED TO DO IS ESTABLISH A FLOOR.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IF THAT REALLY BECOMES AN ISSUE WHERE YOU'VE GOT ALL THESE KIDS AND YOU'VE GOT LITTLE LEAGUE FACILITIES THAT CAN'T HANDLE IT ALL.

ONE OF THE NICE THINGS ABOUT HAVING THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICTS IS THAT PARTICULARLY ON THE BACKEND OF THAT PROJECT, WHEN THEY'RE ABLE TO ISSUE PARK BONDS BECAUSE THEY REALLY AREN'T ABLE TO ISSUE PARK BONDS UNTIL YOU'VE GOTTEN THROUGH THE WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, ROAD TYPE STUFF.

THERE'S PLENTY OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE MOB TO PARTNER WITH THE CITY AND THEN YOU'VE GOT RESIDENT DIRECTORS WHO CAN GET WITH THE CITY.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE THE ONES SAYING, WHAT CAN OUR MUD DO TO HELP OUT THE BASEBALL FIELDS AND THE SOCCER FIELDS AND THAT THING.

THOSE AWARE OF THOSE OPPORTUNITIES CAN REALLY PRESENT THEMSELVES, SO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SETS THE FLOOR, IT DOESN'T SET THE CEILING.

I CAN'T PROMISE YOU ANYTHING MORE THAN THAT.

ALL I CAN PROMISE YOU IS THAT IF THE DIRECTORS AT THE TIME BELIEVE THAT THERE'S A NEED TO INCREASE SOCCER FIELDS OR BASEBALL FIELDS TO PARTICIPATE WITH THE CITY, THERE WILL BE A MECHANISM TO DO THAT AS PART OF THE MUD CONSENT THAT Y'ALL WILL DO WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THOSE HAVE BEEN VERY SUCCESSFUL IN PARTNERING WITH CITIES ON THESE TYPES OF FACILITIES IN OTHER LOCATIONS.

>> I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR ON THIS.

YOU'VE TOLD US REPEATEDLY THAT YOUR BUDGET IS $13 MILLION FOR PARKS.

YOU SAY YOU WILL USE FIVE MILLION AND THEN YOU WILL USE 3.8 ON YOUR PRIVATE AND THEN THAT SOMEHOW ANOTHER $4 MILLION IS DISCRETIONARY.

TO ME MY MIND, YOU REALLY USE JUST USING $9 MILLION AND WHETHER YOU DECIDE TO GO USE ANOTHER FOUR MILLION IS ON YOU.

>> I'M SORRY, SAY IT AGAIN.

>> IN MY MIND, THE WAY YOU'RE PRESENTING IT, YOU'RE SELLING AND AS WE'RE USING 13 MILLION, BUT YOU'RE ACTUALLY USING NINE.

IN MY MIND, YOU SHOULD BE TELLING US WE'RE GOING TO SPEND NINE MILLION BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY SPENDING.

>> I'M SORRY IF I'M UNNECESSARILY CONFUSING THE ISSUE.

>> MAYBE I'M CONFUSED.

>> THE REASON WHY WE HAVE A NUMBER IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS TO GIVE YOU ASSURANCE THAT WE WILL SPEND AT LEAST $6 MILLION, FIVE MILLION ON IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE LAND WILL BE WORTH AT LEAST A MILLION DOLLARS.

IF YOU GO BACK TO THE $6 MILLION THAT WE TALKED ABOUT WOULD BE THE HEY, THAT'S JUST THE RIGHT THE CHECK NUMBER.

THAT WAS DESIGNED SO THAT THE CITY COULD HAVE COMFORT THAT AT LEAST THE MINIMUM WAS GOING TO BE DONE.

I WAS HOPING MEGAN WOULD GET UP AND SAY, I BELIEVE THAT THE AGREEMENT MEETS THE PARK ORDINANCE. SHE DIDN'T SAY THAT.

THAT'S WHAT WE WERE STRIVING TO GET TO.

WAS TO ASSURE YOU ALL THAT WE WOULD AT LEAST AS A MINIMUM DO WHAT THE CITY'S PARK ORDINANCE REQUIRES.

WHAT I'M TELLING YOU IS AND WHAT TRAVIS IS REPRESENTING TO YOU TONIGHT, IS THAT IN HIS BUDGET RIGHT NOW, HE HAS $13 MILLION.

CAN THAT BUDGET CHANGE? ABSOLUTELY. IT CAN GO UP.

IT CAN GO DOWN. DEPENDS ON HOW SUCCESSFUL THE PROJECT IS.

[02:55:03]

IT DEPENDS ON VELOCITY, IT DEPENDS ON A LOT OF THINGS.

AS WE'RE STANDING HERE TODAY, IT'S 13 MILLION.

WILL IT BE THAT? I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.

NOBODY KNOWS THE ANSWER TO THAT.

YOU TELL ME WHAT INTEREST RATE YOU'RE GOING TO BE IN TWO YEARS.

I MEAN, IT ALL GOES INTO THAT EQUATION.

WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS TO ASSURE YOU THAT YOU'RE GOING TO GET A QUALITY DEVELOPMENT AND AT LEAST AS A MINIMUM, WHAT YOUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES.

I FULLY EXPECT THAT WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BUILD FAR EXCEEDS WHATEVER YOUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES, BUT AT A MINIMUM, YOU'RE GOING TO GET WHAT YOUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES.

>> BUT I THINK THAT'S THE POINT.

I THINK MAYBE I MISUNDERSTOOD MEGAN TOO.

SHE'S SAYING YOU DON'T MEET OUR REQUIREMENTS AND THEREFORE, YOU DO OWE THE FEES IN LIEU OF MEETING THOSE REQUIREMENTS?

>> NO, I DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT MEGAN SAID.

>> I THINK YOU CAN INTERPRET IT WHETHER HE MEETS REQUIREMENTS AND WHETHER HE GETS CREDIT FOR SOME OF THE AMENITIES THAT HE'S PROVIDING THE PARK.

AGAIN, DEPENDS ON HOW YOU LOOK AT IT.

IF YOU COUNT THE WETLANDS AS PARKLAND THEN IT COUNTS, IF YOU DON'T COUNT IT, IT DOESN'T COUNT.

>> I THINK THAT'S WELL SAID.

>> THAT'S WHY THERE'S THAT.

I'LL JUST SAY OFFER $880,000 AS FEES IN LIEU OF PARKLAND UP TO THE VALUE OF $6 MILLION.

YOU COULD SAY, I'M JUST BEING HYPOTHETICAL HERE, I'M NOT NEGOTIATING OR ANYTHING ELSE.

BUT YOU COULD SAY THAT WE'LL ACCEPT SOME OF IT, BUT WE WANT SOME MORE CREDIT FOR FEES IN LIEU OF PARKWAY.

BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE SOCCER FIELDS, BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE THE BASEBALL FIELDS AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ENHANCE THOSE FACILITIES IN ANGLETON.

WHEN WE GET THAT MONEY, THEN THAT'S WHAT THAT MONEY GOES TO, ITS LIGHTING IT THE SOCCER FIELDS AND A NEW PARKING LOT AND EXTRA BATHROOMS OR WHATEVER IT'S GOING TO TAKE TO MAKE THAT MORE AMENABLE TO THE CITY.

>> FOR ME PERSONALLY, MY TWO SENSE IS, I THINK WE SHOULD AT LEAST STICK TO THE 50% FOR THE PUBLIC PRIVATE DESIGNATION THAT WE HAVE IN OUR PARKLAND EDUCATION, THAT IF IT IS FOR RECREATIONAL USE, BUT THE PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO IT.

ONLY HOA, 50% OF THOSE FUNDS.

WE CAN ONLY GIVE THEM CREDIT FOR 50% OF THAT.

>> IT'S A LOT MORE 1.9 MILLION?

>> IT WILL BE 1.9.

>> WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY CREDIT FOR THE REC CENTER.

EVEN THOUGH YOU'RE ORDINANCE WOULD ALLOW IT, WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR IT.

>> FOR ME, EVEN THOUGH I DO THINK YOU'RE LOW BALLING THAT ESTIMATE ON 3.8.

>> HE JUST SAID IT IS FROM 2021, SO IT'S PROBABLY WRONG.

>> THAT'S MY TWO SENSE, A MINIMUM OF 1.9.

>> CAN SOMEBODY CHECK MY MATH, IF WE GO UP TO $400 A LOT.

I THINK THAT GETS YOU TO AN EVEN MILLION.

>> I SAID MINIMUM OF 1.9.

>> WE CAN GO UP TO THAT AS LONG AS WE CAN PAY IT AFTER THE HOUSE HAS BEEN BUILT.

KNOW THE CHILD CARE WHEN IT GETS BUILT.

>> IT`S 994,800.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I HAVE THE SAME NUMBER I WAS GOING ON.

>> CAN SOMEBODY TELL ME WHAT A MILLION DIVIDED BY OUR MAX IS? FOUR HUNDRED AND THREE DOLLARS.

>> GREAT. WE'LL AGREE TO $403 AS WE PLOT AND WE WILL GUARANTEE THAT IT'S AT LEAST A MILLION DOLLARS.

NOT AS WE PLOT, AS WE PULL BOTH TYPES, IF WE GET TO THE END AND WE HAVEN'T BUILT THEM ALL, WE WILL MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE.

I DON'T WANT IT TO BE SAID THAT WE DIDN'T PAY [NOISE] A REASONABLE AMOUNT TOWARDS THE CITY'S FACILITIES.

[03:00:12]

>> I WANT TO TALK ABOUT 305.

PARKLAND DEDICATION IS IMPORTANT, BUT THE THING THAT'S ALWAYS COME BACK TO BITE US WAS WE APPROVED DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT BASED ON THE LOT SIZE AND NOW WE'RE BEING HELD TO IT.

THIS IS THE CHANCE.

WE TALKED ABOUT IT IN THE PAST.

I'M NOT SURE THIS IS WHAT WE HAD TALKED ABOUT IN THE PRIOR COUNCIL MEETINGS.

THERE ARE ONLY 10% WOULD BE 60 AND ABOVE.

>> AGAIN, THOSE ARE MINIMUMS.

>> BUT YOU PUT MINIMUM OUT THERE, PEOPLE ARE GOING TO DO THE MINIMUM SOMETIMES.

>> BUT YOU SAY THAT, BUT LET ME GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE.

RIGHT UP IN MANVEL DEL BELLO LAKES SPENT UNGODLY AMOUNT OF TIME NEGOTIATING WITH THE CITY TO GET MORE 50-FOOT LOTS.

IT TURNED OUT WE NEEDED MORE 60-FOOT LOTS.

I CAN'T TELL YOU WHAT THE MARKET IS GOING TO DO.

HE CAN'T TELL YOU WHAT THE MARKET IS GOING TO DO.

I SAY THAT NOT TO BE FLIP ABOUT IT, IT'S JUST, IF YOU LOOK AT THE MARKET EVEN TWO YEARS AGO AND TRY TO PREDICT WHAT THE HOUSING MIX SHOULD BE, YOU WOULD HAVE BEEN DEAD WRONG.

AGAIN, THE LOT SIZES ARE DESIGNED TO BE MINIMUMS, THEY`RE NOT MAXIMUMS. HE'S GOING TO SELL AS MANY LOTS IN AS MANY DIFFERENT PRICE POINTS AS THE MARKET WILL BEAR.

IT'S IN HIS BEST INTEREST TO DO THAT.

>> BUT IT'S MY BEST INTEREST NOT TO SAY 10% MINIMUM.

>> IT'S IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO MAKE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT GETS YOU ANY RESTRICTION ON LOTS.

>> ABSOLUTELY.

>> IT COULD BE ALL 45S.

IT COULD BE TRAILERS.

COULD BE BUILT FOR RENT.

WE'VE AGREED NO BUILT FOR RENT.

WE AGREED NO TRAILERS.

LOOK AND I KNOW THAT THIS IS HEY, HOW FAR CAN WE GO? WE REALLY HAVE SPENT A YEAR AND A HALF AND WE'RE AT AS FAR AS WE CAN GO AND STILL FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT WE CAN HAVE A SUCCESSFUL PROJECT.

WE'RE AT THAT POINT AT THIS POINT.

WE HAVE MADE A LOT OF CONCESSIONS TO THE CITY TO TRY TO BE RESPONSIVE TO ALL OF YOUR CONCERNS.

>> WELL, THEN YOU'RE REALLY GOING TO BE UNHAPPY WITH MY NEXT QUESTION.

YOU HAVE INTEREST COMING OFF 521, MAIN INTEREST IN THE ANGLETON IS GOING TO BE 44. WOULD YOU AGREE WITH THAT?

>> YOU GOT THE MAIN INTEREST COMING OFF OF 521.

>> YOUR MAIN INTEREST IS 521? RIGHT NOW YOU HAVE NO ACCESS TO 88 CURRENTLY.

>> CORRECT.

>> YOU'RE STILL IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH TEXTON?

>> WE HAVEN'T STARTED NEGOTIATIONS WITH TEXTON.

>> THAT'S IN THE FUTURE.

>> BUT YOU'RE GOING TO HELP US GET THAT ACCESS.

>> DO WHAT?

>> YOU'RE GOING TO HELP US GET THAT ACCESS.

>> I WOULD LOVE FOR YOU TO HAVE THAT ACCESS.

RIGHT NOW, EVERYONE COMING INTO THAT SUBDIVISION IS GOING TO COME DOWN 521, COME DOWN 44 TO GO IN ANGLETON.

BECAUSE THAT'S THE ONLY WAY. THE FASTEST WAY. IT'S LIKE WATER.

>> I AGREE WITH THAT.

>> TWO THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED AND NINETY SEVEN HOMES, 521 AND CURRENTLY 44.

WHAT DOES THAT GOING TO DO? ARE YOU PUTTING IN ANY MONEY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE ROAD?

>> DO WE HAVE SOMEBODY FROM THE ENGINEER? YOU'RE GOING TO ADDRESS THE TRAFFIC? ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE TRAFFIC PLEASE?

>> NITIA WE DO HAVE EXTENSIVE IMPROVEMENTS TO 521 TO ANCHOR EVEN ALL THE WAY DOWN TO ANCHORS NEXT INTERSECTION I BELIEVE ARE.

>> FIVE TWENTY THREE.

>> OUR ENGINEER IS SAYING THAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO UPGRADE THE STREET LIGHT OR ADD ONE.

BUT TIA DOES INCLUDE SCOPE ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THAT CONNECTION.

>> HAVE YOU ALL SEEN THAT? JOHN? HAVE YOU SEEN THE TIA?

>> JUDITH, HAVE YOU SEEN THE TIA?

.>> OTIS, HAVE YOU SEEN THE TIA?

>> WE HAVE IT ON FILE.

>> WE DO?

>> IS IT IN MY PACKET?

>> IT'S NOT IN TODAY'S PACKET.

[03:05:03]

>> LET'S TALK ABOUT DRAINAGE.

WHERE WE STAND ON THE DRAINAGE ISSUES THAT HAMILTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT HAD OPPOSITION TO.

>> I'LL BACK UP TO KENNEDY ROAD 44 REAL QUICKLY [OVERLAPPING] SINCE YOU BROUGHT IT UP.

THAT'S ONE OF BRAZORIA COUNTY'S MAIN THOROUGHFARES.

IT HAS BEEN DESIGNATED AS A MAIN THOROUGHFARE THEY'RE GOING TO DESIGNATE.

WE'VE ALREADY DETERMINED ITS CROSS-SECTION.

IT'S ULTIMATELY GOING TO BE BUILT TOO.

LIMITING FACTOR RIGHT NOW IS GOING TO BE AS A TWO-LANE BRIDGE OVER THE FREEWAY.

INPUTS SIX LANES COMING UP TO IT.

YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TWO LANES ACROSS THE FREEWAY.

THAT'S UP THE TEXT. THE KENNEDY ROAD 44 FROM 28 FREEWAY INTO TOWN IS WHATEVER SECTION THAT'S GOING TO BE AS DICTATED BY BRAZORIA COUNTY.

THEN ONCE THEY START SEEING THE TRAFFIC THAT COME FROM EITHER THIS SUBDIVISION OR OTHER DEVELOPMENTS OUT THERE, THEN THAT'S WHEN THE COUNTY IS GOING TO HAVE TO START ADDRESSING.

THAT, I SEE EVEN BEFORE THIS SORT OF DIVISION GOES IN, THERE IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 5:23 IN COUNTY ROAD 44.

THERE'S ROUTINE REX OUT THERE NEAR DESK, THEREBY THE DOLLAR GENERAL STORE THERE.

THAT'S GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT'S GOT TO BE ADDRESSED BY A TEXT DOT SINCE THEY'RE THE PRIMARY CARETAKER OF THAT INTERSECTION.

>> DOES IT MEAN DO YOU NOT HAVE THOSE SAME CONCERNS?

>> HI, JOHN.

>> I THINK TRAVIS IS FINE.

>> WE ALWAYS DO A TIA WITH THESE SUBDIVISIONS.

WE HAVE THE PUBLIC INTERESTS AT HEART WITHIN SAFETY AND ALL THAT, AND WE'RE GOING TO DO WHATEVER THAT SAYS WE HAVE TO DO.

I BELIEVE IT'S A PHASE TIA, AND I BELIEVE WE HAVE FROM NORTH OF 05:21 ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THAT.

IS ANCHOR ROAD 44?

>> YES, SIR.

>> YES.

>> 44. I THINK WE HAVE A TOTAL OF SIX SIGNALS ALL UP AND DOWN THERE COMING ONLINE AS OUR DEVELOPMENT AS PHASED.

THAT IS ALL IN THE TIA.

I'LL MAKE SURE ENGINEER'S SHIFT THAT OVER TO YOUR ENGINEER.

>> ACTUALLY, WE HAVE SEEN THE TIA AND HAVE MADE COMMENTS, BUT IT WAS BACK IN AUGUST OF 22, BUT WE HAVE MADE COMMENTS.

THERE WERE SEVERAL COMMENTS.

WE REQUESTED THEM TO PROVIDE A SIGHT DISTANCE ANALYSIS OR VERIFY THE DIRECTION OR JUST DISTRIBUTION IN THE SITE GENERATED OF THE TRIPS.

VERIFY THE 2023 FULL BUILD-OUT PROJECTED.

THINGS OF THAT NATURE ALL THE WAY DOWN.

WE DO HAVE A LOT OF THINGS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED, BUT THEY HAVE SUBMITTED SOMETHING IN THERE.

IN RESPONSE TO THEIRS, WE HAVE SEVEN COMMENTS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.

EVERYTHING FROM DISTRIBUTION TRIPS AND PERCENTAGES TO ASSOCIATED COSTS WITH MITIGATION AND DEVELOPERS' PRORATA COST FOR EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

>> I DON'T KNOW WHERE MY MIND IS.

>> CICO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THAT TEXTS DOTS IN CHARGE OF THE OVERPASS THAT FLIES OVER DANNY WROTE OR KENDRA, AND 44 OVER 288.

>> YES. THAT'S THEIR WORK.

>> I SUGGEST NEXT TIME WE GET MARIA POMTE IN HERE.

NO, I'M SERIOUS. I'M NOT JOKING.

>> SAYING EXPANDING THAT ONE.

>> EXPANDING THEM ALL UP, AND MARIANNA, THEY'RE ADDING IT FROM TWO LINES TO MAKE IT FOUR LANES.

WE BETTER START DOING THE SAME.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> WE SHOULD START WORKING ON NOW BECAUSE WE'VE TALKED ABOUT HOW LONG IT TAKES FOR THESE THINGS TO START MOVING, TO GET THE FUNDING TO GET TO BECAUSE IF THIS GETS DEVELOPED, THAT CAN BE A NIGHTMARE.

LET'S TURN OFF THAT GO OFF SOUTH LAKE JACKSON.

THAT'S GOING TO BE A WRECK WAITING TO HAPPEN.

>> WE'RE ALREADY SEEING A PRETTY HECTIC INTERCHANGE UP THERE AT PI 23 AND 288 OR ABOUT THE TRUCK STOPS IT'S IN THE CAR DEALERSHIPS.

THAT'S GETTING PRETTY CRAZY UP DIFFERENCE AT CERTAIN TIMES OF THE DAY.

>> I'M WITH YOU, MARK. I THINK THAT'S A FAIR NUMBER.

>> MAKE SURE THAT I UNDERSTAND. THE 50 PERCENT CREDIT. 1.9.

[03:10:05]

>> DRAINAGE.

>> ON THE DRAINAGE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND START WITH THAT.

WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM ADD, STARTED LOOKING AT IT.

ADD DID IDENTIFY THAT THE DEVELOPMENT IS OUTSIDE OF THEIR JURISDICTION, AND THEREFORE THAT DRAINAGE PLAN, THE MASTER DRAINAGE PLAN, AND THE MITIGATION, ALL THAT HAS TO BE SUBMITTED TO BRAZORIA COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

HOWEVER, WITH THAT BEING SAID, THEY DID LOOK INTO IT FURTHER AND MADE SOME COMMENTS ON IT.

ADD DOES HAVE THE RIGHT TO LOOK AT THIS BECAUSE IT DOES NOT FALL INTO THE BOROUGH DITCH ALONG A FAMOUS CERTIFIED LEVEE.

THE LEVEE THAT PROTECTS SINGLETON LEVING.

>> THEY ARE COORDINATING WITH THEM CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW ON COMING UP WITH SOME SOLUTIONS.

HAVE YOU ALL STARTED COORDINATION WITH BRAZORIA COUNTY AS OF YET?

>> [BACKGROUND].

>> SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WERE IDENTIFIED IN THEIR CONCERNS, ESPECIALLY ON SOME OF THIS STUFF, IS DETENTION POND NUMBER 2, OUTFALLS INTO AN EASEMENT THAT'S ADJACENT TO A PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNER INTO A NATURAL STREAM.

THERE IS NO EASEMENT. THERE'S NO RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THAT NATURAL STREAM.

THEY WILL HAVE TO ACQUIRE AN EASEMENT, OR RIGHT AWAY FOR THAT BECAUSE THERE WILL BE SOME IMPROVEMENTS AND THERE'LL BE MAINTENANCE THAT WILL BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO ALLOW THAT TO DO.

WE'RE TRYING TO DO IS ESTABLISH A WAY OF MAINTAINING THAT OUTFALL.

TEN YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, WE DON'T HAVE AN IMPACT ON PEOPLE THAT ARE DEVELOPING IN THAT AREA OR TO THE WATER CAN'T GET THROUGH, OR IMPACT THE PEOPLE DOWNSTREAM. THAT'S ONE.

THE OTHER THING IS THEY'RE REQUESTING THAT ENERGY DISPENSER TO SPACE TO BASICALLY GET RID OF THE ENERGY AND MITIGATE THE POTENTIAL EROSION OF THE NATURAL STREAM BECAUSE THERE'S ONLY SO MUCH WATER COMING OUT AT SUCH A SPEED THAT GOING TO SLOW IT DOWN.

BECAUSE OF THE SOUL MATERIALS IN THAT AREA, BECAUSE THE WATER WILL BE MOVING SO FAST.

THEY ARE WANTING THAT TO BE DONE.

THE OTHER ONE IS, IS THAT NO ONE HAS MAINTENANCE OF THAT STREAM.

THAT'S THE BIG ISSUE, AND THAT'S WHY THAT RIGHT-OF-WAY.

IT NEEDS TO BE NEGOTIATED.

WHO SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE? WHO WILL PAY FOR THAT MAINTENANCE? AGAIN, ANGLED AND DRAINAGE DISTRICT DOES NOT HAVE THAT.

IT'S NOT A PUBLIC EASEMENTS AND NATURAL WELL, SO THAT NEEDS TO BE NEGOTIATED IN THERE ON WHAT'S GOING ON.

WHO WILL TAKE CARE OF THAT? THEY DID BELIEVE THAT THE HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ARE ACCEPTABLE, BUT STILL, IT'S UP TO THE BRAZORIA COUNTY TO TAKE A LOOK AT THAT THEY DIDN'T USE THE ATLAS 14.

OTHER THINGS THAT THEY HAD CONCERNS ABOUT WITH IS THE ACTUAL LOCATION OF THE SEWER SANITARY SEWER TREATMENT PLANT, AND IT'S OUTFALL.

IT DOES OUTFALL TO THE BASE OF THAT PROTECTION LOBBY, AND THEY HAVE SOME CONCERNS, ABOUT THAT AS FAR AS THE BOTTOM OF THE PROTECTION LEVY REMAINING WET ALL THE TIME BECAUSE YOU'RE ALWAYS PROCESSING SEWER, ESPECIALLY AS YOU GET MORE AND MORE DEVELOPMENT.

THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME. THOSE THINGS ARE STILL ONGOING.

ADDITIONAL STRENGTH FROM THE WASTEWATER COULD EXASPERATE THE EROSIONS, AND THAT'S ALREADY HAPPENING.

THERE IS SOME EROSIONS THERE, AND AGAIN, THIS WILL HAVE TO BE EXPLORED IN THERE IN THAT PROCESS OF WORKING WITH EVERYBODY ON DOING THAT.

THEY CAN'T START DEVELOPMENT AND TELL THAT STUFF IS TAKEN CARE OF WHEN ADDRESSED, AND WE'D GET A RELEASE OF OBJECTION.

NO OBJECTION IS TAKEN FROM BOTH BRAZORIA ALREADY ACCOUNTING AND HAMILTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT IN REGARDS TO THESE ISSUES.

THERE'S NO WAY WE WOULD OBSERVE A SET OF PLANS TO WHERE IT WOULD IMPACT A FEDERALLY CERTIFIED PROTECTION LEVY WITHOUT HAVING THAT PEOPLE THAT MAINTAIN IT GIVE THEIR APPROVAL ON IT THAT THEY FEEL THEY FEEL SATISFIED.

SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WE NEED TO MAKE SURE OF IS FUTURE MAINTENANCE.

TYPICALLY, WHEN A DEVELOPER, HE'S THE ONE THAT HAS THE POCKETS AVAILABLE.

SAY THEY DO SOME SORT OF A CHANNEL LINING OR SOME BUT 20 YEARS FROM NOW, SOMETHING HAPPENS AND THERE NEEDS TO BE SOME MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS DONE ON THAT.

WELL, HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATIONS TYPICALLY DON'T HAVE THAT TYPE OF FUNDING AT THEIR DISPOSAL.

BUT THAT WOULD BE WHO WOULD BE DOING THE MAINTENANCE ON THIS, PROBABLY WITH THE AGREEMENT OR THE COUNTY.

THAT NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED WHO'S GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.

>> OR THE MONTH.

>> OR THE CITY AND WHAT, 25, 30 YEARS.

>> YEAH. THAT NEEDS TO BE THE MONTH OR, THE MONTH OR THE CITY, BUT IT NEEDS TO BE IDENTIFIED WHO THAT RESPONSIBILITY IS.

AGAIN, THESE ARE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT NEED TO BE WORKED OUT.

BECAUSE THERE WILL HAVE SOME IMPACTS, NOT ONLY TO ADJACENT LANDOWNERS.

THEY WILL HAVE IMPACTS TO THE PROTECTION LEVY.

THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

I HAD PREPARED A KIND OF A THING AND PASS IT ON TO

[03:15:03]

JUDITH AND STAFF WITH THESE THINGS OUTLINED.

I BELIEVE THAT THEY ARE COORDINATING WITH THE DEVELOPER ON THIS TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES.

BUT AGAIN, THOSE HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO ANY KIND OF DEVELOPMENT OCCURRING.

ANY QUESTIONS ON ANY OF THAT?

>> WHY WOULD I APPROVE OF THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TONIGHT BASED OFF DENSITY WHEN WE DON'T HAVE A DRAINAGE PLAN THAT IS APPROVED, THAT IS SATISFACTORY BECAUSE HERE'S WHAT HAPPENS.

WE APPROVED THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT AND THEN WE GET BEAT OVER THE HEAD WITH THAT THE NEXT TIME AND SAID, YOU ALREADY APPROVED THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT AND THE LOT SIZES.

IT'S A CATCH-22.

>> BUT IT'S NOT BECAUSE EVERYTHING THAT WAS JUST DESCRIBED AND THE INTERACTION WITH THE OTHER AGENCIES WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY VARIANCES TO YOUR DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY VARIANCES TO THE COUNTY'S STRANGE REQUIREMENTS WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANY VARIANCES TO WHAT WE'VE GOT TO BUILD ON 521.

THE WAY THE PROCESS WORKS IS YOU DO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT SETS FORTH THE FRAMEWORK.

ALL OF THE ISSUES THAT WERE JUST DISCUSSED ARE NORMAL ISSUES THAT ARE ADDRESSED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS FOR ALL THE FACILITIES THAT HAVE TO GET APPROVAL FROM THE CITY, THE COUNTY, AND THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

>> I APPRECIATE YOU SAYING THAT, BUT THAT'S NOT HOW IT'S BEEN PRESENTED TO US IN THE PAST.

THAT YOU APPROVED OF DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT BASED OFF THE EXHIBIT AND THEN WE GET TOLD YOU HAVE TO PROVE IT BECAUSE YOU'VE ALREADY APPROVED THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT.

I'M LOOKING OVER AT JUDITH BECAUSE THAT'S HOW IT'S BEEN EXPLAINED TO ME IN THE PAST.

>> YEAH. WELL, THIS IS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THOUGH BECAUSE IT'S IN THE ETJ AND THERE WOULD BE A MIND.

BUT I DO AGREE WITH YOUR ASSESSMENT ON THE INFILL DEVELOPMENTS THAT THAT'S ABSOLUTELY TRUE.

I WOULD SAY THAT BASED ON WHAT YOUR CITY ENGINEER JUST SAID THAT I WOULD MAKE A RECOMMENDATION IF WE GOT CLOSE ENOUGH THAT CITY COUNCIL WANTED TO PROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT IT WOULD BE DEPENDENT UPON EVERYTHING THAT JOHN PETERSON JUST SAID THAT THE MAYOR IS NOT GOING TO SIGN DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THAT IT'S NOT ENFORCEABLE UNTIL WE KNOW THAT I THINK IT WAS A NON-INJECTION LETTER THAT WE WERE SEEKING FROM ADD.

>> BUT THAT'S NOT, RESPECTFULLY, THERE'S NO WAY ANYBODY IS GOING TO KNOW THE ADD IS NOT GOING TO SIGN OFF ON SOMETHING UNTIL YOU HAVE A COMPLETE SET OF DRAWINGS.

THE ENERGY DISSIPATION DEVICE THAT HE'S DESCRIBING IS CONCRETE TEETH AND THE CHANNEL AND THE SPACING AND THE SIZING IS ALL, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT GOING THROUGH DETAILED DESIGN OF A LOT OF THESE FACILITIES BEFORE YOU ADDRESS THE COMMENTS HE JUST ADDRESSED AND WE CAN'T DO THAT UNLESS WE KNOW WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT.

I DON'T KNOW. IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'VE HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE WITH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BEFORE.

I'VE NEVER HEARD OF WHAT YOU'VE JUST DESCRIBED.

I'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR A LONG TIME. I'VE NEVER HEARD OF WHAT YOU'VE DESCRIBED.

WE'VE GOT TO COMPLY WITH EVERYBODY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS WHEN WE DESIGN STUFF AND WE GOT TO GET APPROVALS FROM EVERYBODY TO GO BUILD STUFF.

NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT CHANGES THAT.

WE'RE NOT TRYING TO MAYBE THAT AGREEMENT THAT YOU'RE DEALING WITH CHANGE IT.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR YOU TO CHANGE ANYTHING OR TO AGREE TO LET US DO SOMETHING THAT DOESN'T MEET YOUR CRITERIA FOR PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE.

WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR THAT. THAT'S NOT IN THIS AGREEMENT.

>> MY POSITION WOULD BE THAT I GUESS WE'RE AT AS YOU SAID CATCH-22 EARLIER AND I FEEL LIKE WE'RE MAYBE AT THAT SAME PLACE RIGHT NOW ON THIS PARTICULAR ISSUE BECAUSE YOU'RE ASKING US TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH YOU ALL, BOASTFULLY AND I'M NOT SAYING YOU SHOULDN'T BE BOASTFUL.

THE BIGGEST PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON'S HISTORY LITERALLY WILL GROW BY 167%.

WILL TAKE A CITY OF 18,000 AND PARTICULARLY TAKE US TO A CITY OF 30,000, 89,000 RESONANCE EVENTUALLY IN THIS RESONANCE.

WE'RE MORE THAN WHERE WE ARE.

WHAT'S THAT 150%, I DON'T AGREE WITH THAT. BUT WHATEVER.

WE WANT TO HAVE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE WHEN WE'RE TRYING TO ENTER INTO THESE AGREEMENTS OR MAKE THESE DECISIONS, AND YOU'RE SAYING YOU CAN'T GIVE US THAT INFORMATION UNTIL THE MORTGAGE IS ON PAPER, AND FOR MY COMFORT LEVEL, I WANT TO SEE THESE NUMBERS.

>> WELL, HOLD ON.

I DIDN'T SAY THAT I COULDN'T GET YOU INFORMATION AND WE'VE PROVIDED IT TO YOU.

>> I UNDERSTOOD THAT YOU WERE SAYING UNTIL THINGS ARE PUT ON PAPER, IT'S REALLY HARD FOR US TO DICTATE, I GUESS THE SCHEMATICS AND THE MATH AND ALL THAT IN PLACE, AND LOOK, I GET IT.

I'M NOT AN ENGINEER. I'M NOT TRYING TO PUT MYSELF IN THE SEAT OF AN ENGINEER.

I'M TRYING TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION AND I'LL FEEL LIKE I NEED MORE INFORMATION TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION. THAT'S ALL WHERE I AM.

[03:20:04]

>> ALL I WAS TRYING TO SAY IS THAT WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET APPROVAL AT THE LEVEL OF DETAIL THAT YOU'RE ASKING THAT WE WERE IN WHEN HE WAS DESCRIBING HIS CONCERNS.

UNTIL WE GET INTO FULL PLAN SUBMISSION AND PLAN APPROVAL.

THAT'S JUST THE WAY IT WORKS.

YOU GET A BIG-PICTURE OVERVIEW.

NONE OF THIS IS SET IN STONE IN THE SENSE OF THAT ROSE GOT TO BE EXACTLY RIGHT THERE.

IT'S A GENERAL POINT THAT STUFF WILL MOVE AS YOU GET IN INTO DESIGN.

BUT TO SAY THAT WE WANT THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT JUST TO SIGN OFF ON A SET OF PLANS THAT HASN'T BEEN DEVELOPED BEFORE WE APPROVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S POSSIBLE.

WE WOULD HAVE TO SPEND SO MUCH MONEY DEVELOPING PLAN SETS AND ALL THAT BEFORE WE EVER KNOW WE'VE GOT AN AGREEMENT TO DO OUR DEVELOPMENT, NOBODY WOULD MAKE THAT BUSINESS DECISION, AND MAYBE I'M NOT EXPLAINING IT RIGHT.

[OVERLAPPING]

>> YOU'RE SAYING THAT WE'RE ASKING YOU TO SPEND MONEY THAT YOU DON'T FEEL LIKE IT'S NECESSARY TO SPEND UNTIL WE ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT AND THEN WE'LL SPEND THAT MONEY.

>> BUT TO BE FAIR, YOU ALL ARE ASKING US FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

YOU ALL ARE THE ONES THAT WANT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

WE CAN DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

IT IS EASIER AND BETTER FOR EVERYBODY IF WE HAVE A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND WE'VE BEEN WORKING OUR ASS OFF FOR A YEAR-AND-A-HALF TO COME UP WITH A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, AND EVERY TIME WE COME HERE, SOMEBODY HAS SOMETHING NEW AND IT'S A BIT FRUSTRATING.

WE HAVE PROVIDED YOU ALL WITH REAMS OF INFORMATION.

WE HAVE MORE INFORMATION ON THIS PROJECT AT THIS STAGE OF THE PROJECT THAN I'VE EVER SEEN, AND I GET IT'S YOUR FIRST ONE, A BIG PROJECT LIKE THIS.

BUT YOU'RE ASKING US TO DO SOMETHING THAT IS SIMPLY NOT THE WAY THE SEQUENCE WORKS.

I DON'T KNOW HOW ELSE TO SAY IT AND I'M SORRY IF I'M NOT COMMUNICATING THAT POINT VERY WELL BUT THIS IS A GENERAL PLAN.

IT IS NOT PLANS.

IT'S NOT PLAN SETS IT'S NOT CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.

>> FIRST OF ALL, I UNDERSTAND FROM WHERE I SIT, I SHARE MR. WRIGHT'S FRUSTRATIONS.

I'VE NOT BEEN A PART OF MANY PLAN DEVELOPMENTS AND WHEN WE COME BACK, JUST LIKE WE HAD TO DEAL WITH WHEN ROSE GREEN TONIGHT, THAT WAS A PREVIOUS PLAN DEVELOPMENT, NOT IN THE CITY LIMITS, AND THEY'RE TELLING US WE HAVE AN OBJECTION.

WE'VE MADE OUR OBJECTION.

WE HAVE NO OTHER RECOURSE OTHER THAN TO ACCEPT THEIR RESPONSES AND MOVE FORWARD.

THAT'S WHERE WE'VE BEEN IN A POSITION THAT WE FEEL LIKE AT LEAST SOME OF US UP HERE DON'T WANT TO HAVE BUYER'S REMORSE THAT WHEN WE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT, WE DIDN'T GET EVERYTHING THAT WE COULD HAVE AND WE'RE SITTING BACK 15 OR SHOULD HAVE WHATEVER ARGUMENT OR WHATEVER VERBIAGE YOU WANT TO USE, AND THEN SITTING BACK FIVE, 10 YEARS LATER GOING, I WISH WE WOULD HAVE OR THE NEXT PERSON WHO'S SITTING IN MY SEAT BECAUSE THERE'S GOING TO BE SOMEBODY WHO'S PRESENTING MY SCENE, MAYBE TWO PEOPLE FROM NOW SITTING IN MY SEAT WONDERING WHAT THE HECK WAS TRAVIS TOWNSEND THINKING WHEN THEY SIGNED OFF ON THIS? THAT'S WHY WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION.

>> I APPRECIATE THAT.

>> PERSONALLY, I FIND YOUR ATTITUDE A LITTLE CONDESCENDING TOWARDS US.

I'LL BE HONEST, I'M NOT TRYING TO PICK A FIGHT WITH YOU.

BUT YOUR WORDS LIKE THIS IS OUR FIRST TIME, I GET THE IMPRESSION THAT YOU FEEL THAT WE'RE A BUNCH OF COUNTRY BUMPKINS WHO CAN'T UNDERSTAND YOUR BIG-TIME BIG-CITY LANGUAGE.

>> I THINK THEY WERE YOUR WORDS AND IT WAS YOUR FIRST THEY WEREN'T MY WORDS.

>> I SAID I THINK IT WAS MY FIRST MAJOR. ANYWAY.

>> I APOLOGIZE IF I OFFENDED YOU OR SEEMED CONDESCENDING, AND THERE'S REALLY NO BUTS TO THAT I APOLOGIZE TO YOU.

I DID NOT MEAN TO BE CONDESCENDING TO YOU. NO BUTS.

>> I'M EXPRESSING MY GENUINE THOUGHTS WITH YOU, I'M SURE THE REST OF THE COUNCIL ARE EXPRESSING THEIRS AS WELL.

YOU MAY FIND IT SHALLOW, NOT DEVELOPED, NOT WELL-ROUNDED, WELL THOUGHT OUT, AND THAT'S FINE.

YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION.

BUT I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THE QUESTIONS THAT WE'RE RAISING OR QUESTIONS THAT WE HAVE IN OUR OWN MINDS THAT WE FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO BE ANSWERED.

THAT'S ALL. I'M NOT TRYING TO PUT YOU. [OVERLAPPING]

>> SIR THEY ARE LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS, AND AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE TO YOU IF I OFFENDED YOU, THAT WAS NOT MY INTENT.

ALL I'M TRYING TO COMMUNICATE IS THAT LET ME BACK UP,

[03:25:04]

THE ANSWERS TO SOME OF YOUR LEGITIMATE QUESTIONS ARE NOT ANSWERS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO PROVIDE UNTIL WE ARE WELL INTO DEVELOPING CONSTRUCTION PLANS.

THERE ARE ANSWERS TO YOUR QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN PROVIDE AND I THINK WE HAVE PROVIDED WE'VE PROVIDED DRAFTS OF OUR DRAINAGE STUDY.

WE'VE PROVIDED DRAFTS WITH OUR TIA, ALL OF WHICH HAVE TO BE APPROVED BEFORE WE CAN DO ANYTHING.

ALL OF YOUR CONCERNS ARE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS, AND I THINK WE HAVE DONE A WHOLE LOT OF WORK TO TRY TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE CONCERNS, AND YOU HAVE PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES IN YOUR INFRASTRUCTURE STANDARDS THAT REQUIRE US TO ADDRESS ALL OF THOSE IN DETAIL AS WE GET FURTHER ALONG IN THE PROCESS.

DOES ANYBODY THINK THAT'S NOT THE CASE IN TERMS OF HOW YOUR REGULATIONS WORK?

>> I BELIEVE YOU'RE TOTALLY ON POINT WITH THAT.

THIS IS IN AN AREA THAT IS AGAIN, BEATING THE SAME OLD HORSE AGAIN.

THE ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT HAS NOTHING TO SAY WITH THE DRAINAGE OR DETENTION OR ALL THAT.

THAT IS GOING TO BE REVIEWED BY BRAZORIA COUNTY, BUT IT'S GOING TO BE REVIEWED USING THE SAME CRITERIA THAT ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT WOULD BE.

DRAINAGE DISTRICT IS CONCERNED ABOUT THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROTECTION LEVEE BEING WET AT ALL TIMES.

THERE HAS TO BE SOME MECHANISM, SOME METHOD OF PROTECTION COME UP WITH TO PROTECT THE LEVEE FROM A NON STOP FLOW OF WATER FROM A SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT.

THEY'VE DEALT WITH PRETTY MUCH NON-STOP FLOW OF WATER FROM IRRIGATION UPSTREAM FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS.

THAT'S WHAT THEY FOUND THAT THE OUTSIDE OR THE WET SIDE OF THE LEVEE WOULD SLOUGH OFF DURING PLANNING TIME THAN DRAWING TIMES.

THEY HAVE TO GO BACK IN THERE AND REBUILD AND REBUILD AND REBUILD AND THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO DO THAT.

THAT'S A PURPOSE FOR PUTTING SOME PROTECTION DEVICE AT THE BASE OF THE LEVEE SO IT DOESN'T JEOPARDIZE THE LEVEE.

AGAIN, TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS, THESE ARE THINGS THAT WE ADDRESSED THEM IN OUR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.

BUT WE DON'T REALLY HAVE CONTROL OVER WHAT SIZE OF ROADS THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BUILD OUT THERE.

COUNTY ROAD 44, FM521, CROSSING 523, THOSE ARE ALL DICTATED BY TXDOT OR BRAZORIA COUNTY WHO ARE THE CARETAKERS OF THOSE THOROUGHFARES.

WE WANT TO SEE THESE THINGS DONE CORRECTLY, BUT WE'RE NOT THE REVIEWER OF DRAINAGE, WE'RE NOT REVIEWER OF PROTECTING THE LEVEE, WE'RE NOT THE REVIEWER OF WHAT SIZE ROAD YOU PUT IN OUT THERE OUTSIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

I DON'T SEE HOW ANY DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT CAN ADDRESS THAT BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THAT.

>> I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU THAT PART OF IT, BUT I THINK WE ARE THE BODY THAT FIGHTS FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON.

I THINK WE ARE THE BODY THAT SAYS, LET'S GET AS MUCH AS WE WANT AND MUCH AS WE CAN FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON.

>> I AGREE WITH THAT.

>> WE'VE GOT TO DO THAT AND THIS IS OUR CHANCE DO THAT.

>> [OVERLAPPING] OVER DRAINAGE AND STUFF THAT WE HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH.

>> BUT WE WANT TO PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF ANGLETON WITH THAT LEVEE SYSTEM AND IT'S WORKED, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING PRETTY WELL OVER THE YEARS.

I DON'T KNOW. Y'ALL HAVE LIVED HERE LONGER THAN I HAVE.

>> [OVERLAPPING] GET THE LETTER OF NO OBJECTION FROM THE ANGLETON DRAINAGE.

THEY WERE TO COME UP WITH A PLAN THAT ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT WILL APPROVE OR SO I HAVE NO OBJECTION YOU DOING SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

>> HE'S JUST HIGHLIGHTING THAT THIS IS JUST NOT AN ANGLETON ISSUE.

THIS IS A THREE PARTY ISSUE AND IT'S HARD FOR US TO COME TO AN AGREEMENT WHEN THERE IS NO AGREEMENT WITH THE OTHER TWO ENTITIES THAT ARE INVOLVED THAT ARE, THAT'S REALLY A SEESAW.

WHAT YOU ARE POINTING OUT.

>> WE GOT TO DO TO COORDINATE WHAT THE REGULATIONS SAY.

THE SAME AS THE REGULATIONS THAT ARE ADDRESSED BY SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS, SAME THING AS REGULATIONS BY WATER PROVISIONS.

SOME OF THESE ARE AT STATE-LEVEL,

[03:30:02]

OTHERS ARE MORE LOCAL LEVEL, COUNTY LEVEL WITH IT.

I'M HAPPY TO SEE WE'VE GOTTEN THIS FAR WITH THE DRAINAGE WITH THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT.

BUT AGAIN, I DON'T THINK WE CAN PUT THINGS IN A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WE DON'T HAVE JURISDICTION OVER.

>> MR. BOOTH IS RIGHT, THAT WE DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO SET FORTH DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS AND ROAD REQUIREMENTS OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS.

HOWEVER, AS COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND POINTS OUT, WE HAVE TO FIGHT FOR WHAT'S BEST FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND AS COUNCILWOMAN DANIEL MENTIONS, IT'S A THREE-PART ISSUE.

TO ME, WHY WOULD I APPROVE AS THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT FIRST AND BE THE FIRST DOMINO TO FALL WHEN THERE'S OTHER ISSUES THAT ARE STILL OUT THERE BECAUSE I KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENED IN THE PAST AS WELL.

THE CITY APPROVED THIS, SO YOU NEED TO APPROVE THIS AND TO ME, I'M JUST TRYING TO BE CAUTIOUS AND MAKE SURE THAT I'M DOING THE BEST FOR THE CITIZENS OF ANGLETON, AND IT WASN'T JUST THAT I CAME UP WITH SOME OF THESE THINGS.

SOME PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY HAVE ACTUALLY COME TO ME, CITIZENS AND STAFF TO SAY THIS IS A BIG IMPACT ON THEIR COMMUNITIES BASICALLY AND ARE WE DOING THE RIGHT THING? THAT'S WHY I'M GOING THROUGH ALL THE ISSUES.

I HAVE NO CONTROL OVER THE DRAINAGE OR THE STREETS, BUT I'M GOING TO BRING UP THE ISSUES BECAUSE IT NEEDS TO BE BROUGHT UP.

NOW, MAYBE I BROUGHT IT UP AND NOW IT'S ON THE RADAR OF SOMEBODY ELSE.

BUT IT'S GOING TO BE ASKED, JUDITH, IN A CASE LIKE THIS WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A ROAD IMPACT, EVENTUALLY THE CITY IS GOING TO ANNEX THIS PROPERTY.

ONE OF THE QUESTIONS I HAD AND I CAN'T FIND IT HERE.

WHAT'S THE DATE? IS THERE A 25-YEAR, 50 YEAR?

>> YOU'RE ASKING ME WHEN DOES THE LIMITED PURPOSE ANNEXATION HAPPEN? WELL, THAT DEPENDS ON THE CONSTRUCTION, BUT THE FULL PURPOSE ANNEXATION, WHERE THE CITY'S ANNEX IS AT IS 25 YEARS.

>> IN 25 YEARS.

>> IT'S GOING TO BE STEADY.

>> IT'S GOING TO BE STEADY.

>> TO HAVE THE OPTION TO ANNEX.

>> YEAH. RIGHT.

>> YOU DON'T HAVE TO.

>> YES. BUT IF YOU HEAR FROM OTHER PEOPLE, THEY SAY IF YOU'RE GOING TO DO THIS, ANNEX IT.

THE COUNTY'S BIG COMPLAINT WAS, HEY, IF YOU'RE GOING TO PUT A DEVELOPMENT IN, ANNEX IT.

>> FOR SURE.

>> RIGHT.

>> BUT HISTORICALLY WITH THESE SBAS, WHEN THE PERIOD WHERE A MUD WAS ELIGIBLE FOR ANNEXATION CAME, THAT THEY USUALLY DO NOT ACTUALLY ANNEX.

>> RIGHT.

>> BUT IT HAPPENS SOMEWHERE AROUND THERE?

>> YEAH. THE ELIGIBILITY IS THE 25 YEARS PRIOR TO THE SBA, AND THAT'S ONE OF THE BIG THINGS THAT YOU GET WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS YOU GET TO THE RIGHT TO ANNEX THIS IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT AN ELECTION.

WITHOUT THAT, THIS WILL NEVER BE IN THE CITY. YOU MAY BE OKAY WITH IT.

>> YEAH. BUT IF IT IS, ANCHOR ROAD GOING FROM 521, MOST LIKELY AT SOME POINT IN 25 YEARS AT THE GROWTH LEVEL WE'RE SEEING, PROBABLY GOING TO END UP BEING THE CITY'S EVENTUALLY.

I CAN SEE THAT. IT IS IN MY BEST INTERESTS NOW TO ASK THE QUESTION.

TWENTY-FIVE YEARS FROM NOW SOMEBODY'S GOING TO BE SITTING HERE GOING, WHY DIDN'T THE CITY THINK OF THAT? THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF MY QUESTION.

>> RIGHT NOW MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE DEVELOPER IS NEGOTIATING WITH THE COUNTY TO COME UP WITH AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY.

>> SURE. BUT THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS.

>> I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE REQUEST THAT WHATEVER IS IN THAT AGREEMENT INCLUDES SOME LANGUAGE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO SATISFY ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COUNTY AND ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER WHAT HAPPENS WITH THOSE TWO ENTITIES, BUT WE CAN REQUEST THAT AS A COMPONENT OF THOSE OTHER AGREEMENTS, IF THEY'RE GOING TO AGREE TO COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS.

>> BUT YOU DON'T NEED AN AGREEMENT TO THAT.

WE'RE OBLIGATED TO COMPLY WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS UNLESS THERE'S AN AGREEMENT TO THE CONTRARY.

I BELIEVE ONE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS MENTIONED WE NEED AN AGREEMENT.

THERE'S NO NEED FOR AN AGREEMENT THAT SAYS WE'RE GOING TO FOLLOW YOUR RULES.

WE'RE REQUIRED FOR THE COUNTY'S RULES. YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I'M SAYING?

>> I HEAR WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.

>> YEAH. BUT IF I COULD, WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON WHERE WE ARE WITH THE COUNTY AGREEMENT?

>> SURE.

>> OKAY. WE'VE MET SEVERAL TIMES WITH COUNTY OVER THEIR CONCERNS WITH RESPECT TO ROADWAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, MAINTENANCE, THAT THING.

WHAT WE'VE AGREED TO DO IS BUILD THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND THE COLLECTORS TO

[03:35:03]

THE COUNTY STANDARDS THAT THE COUNTY WILL TAKE OVER THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE, WHICH IS THE EAST-WEST BECAUSE THEY WANT TO CONTROL THE MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.

THAT'S THE ONLY ROAD THAT THEY WILL MAINTAIN.

NONETHELESS, WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THE COLLECTORS TO THE COUNTY STANDARDS, EVEN THOUGH WE DON'T HAVE TO BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO MAINTAIN THEM.

WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THEM TO THAT STANDARD.

THEN OTIS MENTIONED THIS.

WE'RE GOING TO BUILD THE INTERNAL ROADS TO A STANDARD THAT IS HIGHER THAN YOUR CURRENT STANDARDS.

THERE WAS A BUNCH OF DISCUSSION ABOUT THE IMPACT OF THE SCHOOL AND SCHOOL TRAFFIC ON 521.

WE HAVE AGREED, EVEN THOUGH 521 IS A TEXT DOT ROAD AND THE COUNTY DOESN'T HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THAT ROAD.

WE HAVE AGREED TO ALLOW THE COUNTY-ENGINEERED REVIEW AND COMMENT ON THE TIA AND ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY FOR THAT.

TEXT DOT WILL DO THAT ANYWAY, WE'VE GOT TO GET TEXT-DOT APPROVAL, BUT IT'S AN ADDITIONAL LAYER OF REVIEW.

IF YOU LOOK AT THAT JUST BRIEFLY, WHAT YOU'LL HAVE IS YOU'LL HAVE SOME TURN LANES, SOME SIGNALS.

THE ROAD WILL BE WIDER.

WE'VE ADDRESSED THAT THERE WAS CONCERN OVER SAFETY.

I THINK ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS WAS HERE TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE DISCHARGING FIREARMS AND FIREWORKS.

WE HAVE PUT IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE EXTENSION OF YOUR ORDINANCES TO THIS COMMUNITY SO THAT THOSE CAN BE ENFORCED.

WE HAVE AGREED WITH THE COUNTY, WE'VE GOT TO PAY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AT 1,000 HOUSES.

THERE WAS A BIG CONCERN ABOUT THE SCHOOL TRAFFIC.

WE VISITED WITH THE SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT.

TO THE EXTENT THAT THE CIVILIZATION AND CHANNELIZATION AND ALL THAT DOESN'T HANDLE IT.

THEY HAVE THE STAFF AND THEY WOULD HANDLE ANY TRAFFIC CAUSED BY THE SCHOOL.

THAT WAS A CONCERN.

WE DID HAVE SOME FEEDBACK ON THE POLICE OFFICER OR SHERIFF IN THE COMMUNITY.

THE COMMISSIONERS COURT WANTS US TO USE AN OFF-DUTY OFFICER AS OPPOSED TO AN ON-DUTY OFFICER.

THERE'S NO CONFUSION ABOUT THAT, AND WE JUST SAID IT CAN BE ON DUTY, OFF DUTY THEY PICK SO WE'RE FINE WITH THAT.

THEY DISCUSSED THE AGREEMENT AT COMMISSIONERS COURT IN EXECUTIVE SESSION TODAY.

I HAVE NOT HEARD BACK FROM THE COUNTY ATTORNEY WHETHER THERE WAS ANYTHING FURTHER THAT THEY HAD CONCERNS WITH.

BUT WE HAVE MADE A BUNCH OF PROGRESS.

WE'VE HAD A BUNCH OF COMMUNICATION WITH THEM AND I THINK WE'RE MAKING PROGRESS AND I'M HOPEFUL WE'RE CLOSE.

I'LL KNOW BETTER ONCE I GET SOME FEEDBACK.

>> THANK YOU.

>> YES, SIR. [NOISE] BLESS YOU.

>> ANYMORE QUESTIONS, OR COMMENTS?

>> DOES THIS DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT JUST GET FINISHED?

>> I DON'T THINK IT'S FINISHED.

>> I WAS GOING TO SAY, I WONDER.

>> WE'RE HERE TODAY BECAUSE THE DEVELOPER INSISTED BEYOND THIS AGENDA, BUT THE ENTIRE PARK'S LANGUAGE PROVISION IS NOT FINISHED.

ANY CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT REGARDING THE PAYMENT PER HOUSE IS NOT IN THE AGREEMENT YET BECAUSE IT WAS JUST PITCHED TO ME LAST WEEK.

WE WERE HOPING THAT AFTER DISCUSSION ON PARKS, WE WOULD HEAR WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY ON PARKS.

THAT'S NOT FINISHED.

THE REST OF THE AGREEMENT, PRETTY MUCH IT'S FINISHED.

YES. BUT I WANT TO BE VERY CLEAR THAT THE PARKS IS NOT SO THE RECOMMENDATION CAME FROM THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO CONSIDER APPROVAL DEPENDENT UPON LEGAL COMPLETING IT.

I THINK THE POINTS THAT I'VE POINTED OUT TO YOU BEFORE ON THE PERCENTAGES IN SECTION 3.05, I WENT BACK TO THE DEVELOPER AND AS YOU'VE HEARD TONIGHT, THAT'S WHERE THEIR FIRM AT.

>> YEAH.

>> THE SECTIONS THAT I DISCUSSED THAT I'M GOING TO GO BACK.

I'VE TOUCHED ON ALL OF THOSE.

THERE HAVE BEEN CHANGES.

THERE ARE THINGS THAT WILL MAKE THE COUNTY HAPPY, LIKE BEING ABLE TO ENFORCE OUR ORDINANCES OUT THERE, WHICH WE WOULD NOT NORMALLY BE ABLE TO DO.

BUT THE PARK'S LANGUAGE HAS GOT TO BE HAMMERED OUT.

>> BUT IF YOU HAVE SOME DIRECTION, WE WILL APPRECIATE THAT, SO WE CAN CONTINUE THE DISCUSSION.

>> LET ME JUST MENTION THE SCHOOL IS SUPPOSED TO CLOSE MAY 1ST?

[03:40:04]

>> LATE MAY.

>> I'M SORRY, LATE MAY.

IN THAT AGREEMENT, WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO GET THEM WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR THE 2024 SCHOOL YEAR.

THE REASON WE'VE ASKED FOR YOU ALL TO APPROVE OR DISAPPROVE IT TONIGHT IS BECAUSE WE ARE ALREADY BEHIND ON THAT.

IF WE'RE GOING TO MAKE THAT COMMITMENT TO THE SCHOOL, WE HAVE TO GET GOING ON THE PLANS AND PLOTS THAT WE'VE SUBMITTED AND THEN HAVE BEEN CONDITIONALLY APPROVED, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF A DA.

WE CAN'T MOVE FORWARD WITH ANY OF THAT UNLESS WE HAVE A DA.

WE WOULD HOPE THAT YOU WOULD APPROVE IT TONIGHT.

I'M SURE THAT JUDITH AND I CAN WORK OUT THE LANGUAGE ON THE PAYMENT OF THE ADDITIONAL PARK FEE IF YOU WILL APPROVE THE SUBJECT TO HER APPROVAL US TO FORM.

>> THIS GOES BACK TO WHAT I WAS SAYING EARLIER ABOUT ONCE WE SAY OUR APPROVALS AND THE NEXT GROUP GOES AND SAYS I GOT THE APPROVAL FROM THEM, THEY CAN GO AND THEN THE DOMINOES START FALLING.

THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING, I SWEAR I'M TRYING TO MAKE SURE WE GET IT STRAIGHT.

>> THE DIFFERENCE HERE THOUGH, IS THAT I WON'T ALLOW ANYBODY FROM THE CITY TO SIGN IT UNTIL I'M HAPPY WITH IT.

THAT WOULD BE THE DIFFERENCE AND I DIDN'T HAVE THAT AUTHORITY TO DO SO, AND IT WAS GREAT TO BE HONEST.

[LAUGHTER] I DO WANT TO MAKE THAT DISTINCTION.

AT LEAST HERE, I WOULD SAY, NO, I WILL NOT MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION FOR THE MAYOR TO SIGN IT.

>> YES, WE APPRECIATE IT.

>> THANK YOU.

>> DIFFERENT SET OF PLAYERS IN THE GAME NOW THAN WE DID BEFORE.

>> YOUR LAST OFFER WAS $1 MILLION ON THE PARKLAND DEDICATION?

>> YES, SIR.

>> WHICH WAS 402 TO SOME CHANGE THAT A LOT.

I GUESS THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO DECIDE IS THAT SUFFICIENT TO YOU OR NOT.

>> NO.

>> NOT FOR ME.

>> SEVEN SIXTY SIX IS A LOT [OVERLAPPING] ABOUT THE HOUSING PERMITS.

>> I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T QUITE HEAR YOU.

>> SEVEN SIXTY SIX A LOT PAID UPON THE HOUSING PERMITS, NOT A BOND, NOT ALL AT ONCE.

>> WHAT'S THAT I CANNOT HEAR?

>> 1.9.

>> WHAT?

>> 1.9.

>> 1.9? I JUST SAY ROUND UP TO TWO.

>> IT'S UP TO YOU.

>> INTERESTS COMES IN. IT'S ABOUT TWO PROBABLY BY THE TIME IT ALL GETS PAID OUT.

>> ENRICHMENT, SO FOR CLARITY, WITH PAYMENT UPON DEVELOPMENT.

>> WHAT I WOULD PROPOSE IS THAT IS THAT WE MAKE A PAYMENT TO YOU ALL EVERY QUARTER OR EVERY SIX MONTHS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF TAPS THAT HAD BEEN INSTALLED IN THE PRIOR PERIOD WHATEVER THE FEE ENDS UP BEING.

>> WE DON'T NEED IT ALL AT ONCE.

>> TWO MILLION.

>> I DO TOO.

>> THAT IS BEYOND MY AUTHORITY.

>> I UNDERSTAND.

>> BUT YOU ALL CAN RECOMMEND PUTTING THAT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

>> NO, I COULD SEND IT.

>> WE CAN SEND THAT BACK TO THEM FOR REVIEW, AND HER COMMENT.

BUT YOU CAN SAY THAT YOUR RED LINE IF YOU WANT, THAT YOU WON'T GO ANY LOWER.

>> MARK'S LOGIC MAKES COMPLETE SENSE TO ME.

WELL, I GET WHERE YO YOU COME WITH THAT NUMBER.

IT'S NOT AN ARBITRARY NUMBER.

IT'S NOT LIKE WE'RE PULLING IT OUT OF A HAT.

FALL IS OUR GUIDELINES.

>> HOW DID YOU COME UP TO 776?

>> THAT'S ALL I'M TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT YOUR REASONING JUSTIFICATION.

>> 1.9/2480.

>> WHERE DID THAT 1.9 COME FROM?

>> YEAH.

>> FIFTY PERCENT OF YOUR PROPOSED FACILITY.

>> WE'RE GIVING YOU SOME CREDIT FOR YOUR FACILITY THAT'S PRIVATE, 50% CREDIT.

>> BUT YOU'RE GIVING ME NO CREDIT FOR THE STUFF THAT'S PUBLIC.

>> WELL, WE ARE. WE'RE ONLY ASKING FOR 1.9, WE DIDN'T ASK FOR SIX.

YOU CAN'T HAVE IT BOTH WAYS, MAN.

>> I'M BUILDING AT LEAST SIX IN MY COMMUNITY.

>> WHICH YOU WERE GOING TO DEVELOP SO MANY WAYS YOU ACT LIKE YOU WEREN'T GOING TO PUT ANY AMENITIES.

YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BUILD THIS BEAUTIFUL FACILITY AND NOT PUT ANY AMENITIES, THAT'S GOING TO BE A PART OF IT.

I THINK JOHN RAISED THAT ISSUE, I THINK MARK AS WELL, THIS IS NOT SOMETHING YOU WERE GOING TO JUST THROW OUT A BUNCH OF

[03:45:02]

ASPHALT AND ROADS OF SOME SOLIDS OF GRASS, AND CALL IT A DAY.

[NOISE] WE ARE.

WE ACT LIKE WE HAVE IT, WE HAVE.

WE'RE ASKING FOR HALF OF WHAT YOU'VE PUT INTO THAT REC CENTER. NOT A FULL.

>> I DON'T KNOW WHAT IS BUDGETED FOR THE REC CENTER WHICH HAS GOT TO PASS MORE.

>> WE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT. YOU'RE PROBABLY ALREADY UNDERBIDDING.

IT'S PROBABLY BECAUSE OF NOT YOUR FAULT.

I GET THAT, THE RISING COSTS.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE 3.8 ANYMORE, IT'S PROBABLY ABOUT 3.42 OR MORE.

>> THAT'S WHERE I GOT THE 1.9 FROM.

>> AS I MENTIONED, I DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO MAKE THAT ROOT.

>> I GET IT.

BUT NOT TO BE AGREED UPON TONIGHT, YOU HAVE OUR INSTRUCTIONS.

>> WE'LL PUT THAT IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO PASS BACK.

>> TWO MILLION.

>> THEN MY QUESTION IS TO YOU, ASSUMING I CAN HAMMER OUT LANGUAGE THAT REFLECTS THE TWO MILLION DOLLARS, IS THAT MEAN YOU'RE GOING TO AGREE TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT?

>> I THINK HE'S PRETTY MUCH PUT A GAME PLAN INTO PLACE.

ALL THE THINGS WE ADDRESS AND CONCERNS, Y'ALL HAVE HAMMERED IT OUT AS FAR AS MOVING FORWARD, I THINK TO A LEVEL, LIKE JOHNSON IS PROTECTING 25 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD.

SEEMS LIKE EVERYTHING IS TO ME.

THAT'S JUST MY OPINION, BUT IT'S ALL THERE.

>> ALSO WITH JOHNSON, BUT I THINK WHAT YOU JUST SAID, WHO TAKES RESPONSIBILITY FOR CERTAIN MATTERS 25 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD IF CERTAIN THINGS FAIL OR START TO FAIL.

I THINK THAT LANGUAGE DEFINITELY HAS TO BE IN THERE.

>> I'M GOOD WITH ALL THESE OTHER EXTRA THINGS LIKE HE MENTIONED.

HE CAN'T BUILD UNTIL HE KNOWS HE'S GOT TO GET THE APPROVAL FROM THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND WORK THAT ISSUE AT THE COUNTY'S.

HE'S NOT GOING TO GET ANYTHING OUT THERE UNTIL HE HAS APPROVAL OF THE COUNTY.

WE MAY DO EVERYTHING TONIGHT.

IF THEY DON'T, THEN IT'S NOW HIS BATTLE WITH THEM TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT AN ANSWER TO APPEASE BOTH PARTIES SO THAT WE CAN'T CONTROL.

YES, I UNDERSTAND, 10, 15 YEARS HE'S GOING TO PUT THAT IMPACT, BUT WE CAN'T CONTROL THAT, HE SAID THE BIG PIECE IS TEXTON.

WE HAVE NO CONTROL BUILDING A BRIDGE.

THERE IS NO CONTROL THAT THEY CAN BUILD A BRIDGE TO GO FROM WIDE TO SMALL, BACK TO WIDE.

I MEAN, THAT DOESN'T WORK.

YES, I THINK SO.

MR. MALONE, I THANK YOU. YOU'RE RIGHT.

YEAR-AND-A-HALF TO COME BACK AND FORTH, BACK AND FORTH, BACK AND FORTH. YOU'VE SPENT RESOURCES.

I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR STICKING IT OUT AND WE'RE TO THIS POINT, I'M HOPING WE CAN HAMMER SOME MORE AND BE DONE.

WE'RE ON OUR WAY AND IT'S DONE.

BUT THANK YOU FOR BEING THIS PATIENT AS YOU'RE BEING THIS PATIENT WITH US.

>> THANK YOU TOO [BACKGROUND]

>> I THINK WE CAN GET YOU TO THE ONE, NINE, BUT WE HAVE TO TAKE SOMETHING OUT OF OURS.

I'M NOT SURE THAT THAT MATTERS TO YOU-ALL.

YOU GET WHAT YOU-ALL WANT, BUT WE'D PROBABLY HAVE TO TAKE OUT FROM THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT. WE MAY STILL DO IT.

THAT FIVE-ACRE CHUNK RIGHT THERE AT THE CORNER, WHICH STILL COMMIT TO SPENDING THE MONEY THAT WE'VE GOT IN THERE.

WE'LL JUST TAKE THAT LAND OUT.

EFFECTIVELY, WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE TAKING PARK AND REC FROM OUR DEVELOPMENT AND PUTTING THE MONEY INTO YOUR CITY.

>> WELL, WE'LL TAKE ITS PLACE?

>> WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THE DISCRETIONARY FOUR MILLION DOLLARS?

>> WHEN YOU SAY DISCRETIONARY FOUR MILLION, I'M NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?

>> YOU PITCHED IT TO US AS WE'RE GOING TO SPEND $13 MILLION ON PARK DEVELOPMENT.

SIX HAS BEEN DESIGNATED FOR YOUR PUBLIC ACCESS, ROUGHLY SIX, 3.8 FOR YOUR PRIVATE PROPERTY REACHING AROUND NINE, AND THEN YOU HAVE UP TO ANOTHER FOUR MILLION DOLLARS.

THAT'S DISCRETIONARY SPENDING IN MY MIND.

WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THAT OTHER FOUR MILLION DOLLARS?

[03:50:01]

YOU CAN'T PUT THAT IN NOW.

>> WELL, I THINK THAT ALL GOES TO WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THE TRAILS.

HOW MANY TREES ARE YOU PLANNING? IS IT A TREE EVERY 50 FEET OR TREE EVERY 100 FEET? THAT'S WHERE THAT DISCRETIONARY STUFF COMES INTO PLAY.

ARE WE PUTTING 10 PARK BENCHES OR FIVE PARK BENCHES.

THAT'S WHERE THE PLAY IS, I THINK.

>> COUNCILOR DANIEL HAD A GOOD QUESTION.

WHAT TAKES ITS PLACE?

>> NOTHING TAKES ITS PLACE.

WE'RE TAKING A MILLION DOLLARS OUT OF WHAT WOULD BE SPENT HERE, AND WE'RE TRANSFERRING IT TO YOU TO SPEND WHERE YOU WANT TO SPEND IT.

THAT'S WHAT YOU-ALL ASK, I THINK.

>> YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A FIVE-ACRE BLANK SPACE?

>> I'M SORRY?

>> YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A FIVE-ACRE BLANK SPACE?

>> NO, THAT FIVE-ACRES WOULD BE AVAILABLE PROBABLY FOR DEVELOPMENT OR SOMETHING ELSE.

>> EXACTLY. THAT WOULD BE ADDING TO THE 1.9 FIGURE THAT WE'VE COME UP WITH BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO GIVE US MORE HOUSES.

>> INSTEAD OF DOING 257 ACRES, WERE DOING 252 ACRES OF OPEN SPACE.

WE'RE SPENDING THE SAME AMOUNT OF MONEY, AND WE'RE GIVING YOU AN ADDITIONAL A MILLION DOLLARS.

>> WELL, I THINK SHE MAKES A GOOD POINT THOUGH.

YOU PUT MORE HOUSES AND WE PUT A PREMIUM PER HOUSE, THEN YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY MORE PER HOUR [OVERLAPPING] GOES UP IT'S NOT 1.9, IT COMES UP TO HAVING MORE HOUSES [OVERLAPPING]

>> WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR MORE LOTS.

>> YOU KNOW WHERE THE AGREEMENT STOPS, THERE'S A CAP ON HOW MANY HOUSES THEY CAN PUT [BACKGROUND] WHATEVER THEY DO, IF I'M THINKING, IF YOU HAVE THE SAME NUMBER OF AMOUNT, THEN MAYBE THAT'S THE AREA YOU HAVE BIGGER LOT SIZE.

THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. I DON'T THINK THAT WILL HAPPEN.

WE'RE OKAY NOW. YOU HAVE GOOD QUESTION [OVERLAPPING].

>> IT WILL STILL BE OPEN SPACE NOT DEVELOPED.

>> NOW YOU GET THE BIGGER LOTS BECAUSE NOW YOU HAVE MORE ROOM.

>> IT WOULD BE PART OF THE DETENTION.

>> I GOT YOU.

>> YOU JUST WOULDN'T HAVE ALL THE FACILITIES THAT WOULD MAKE THAT FIVE-ACRE CITY PARK [OVERLAPPING]

>> WHY DON'T YOU EXPLAIN IT.

>> WE TOOK AN AREA OF OUR WET DETENTION AND AGREED TO MAKE IT UP TO THE CITY ORDINANCE, WHICH INCLUDES PLAY FEATURES, BATHROOMS, PARKING LOT, EVERYTHING 100%, SO WE'RE JUST NOT GOING TO DO THAT.

NOW IT'S JUST GOING TO GO BACK TO BEING WET DETENTION WITH TRAILS AROUND IT.

JUST LIKE ALL OF OUR OTHER DETENTION.

IT WAS NOT TAKEN FROM A SINGLE-FAMILY, SO IT WILL NOT BE REPLACED BY A SINGLE-FAMILY.

>> FOR ME, AS LONG AS IT'S NOWHERE HOUSES DOESN'T BOTHER ME.

I WANT TO TAKE AWAY FROM AMENITIES AS JUST THE CHOICE.

>> WELL, WE'RE FUNDING AMENITIES THAT WILL HOPEFULLY BE USED BY EVERYBODY. BOTH OURS AND YOURS.

>> I'LL GO WITH IT. [OVERLAPPING].

>> ARE YOU GOOD WITH IT?

>> I APPRECIATE IT

>> MEGAN, WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

>> I DO THINK THAT THIS IS A GOOD NEGOTIATING POINT.

THIS ADDRESSES ONE OF THE NUMBER ONE ITEMS IN OUR MASTERING STRATEGIC PLAN, WHICH IS TRAILS.

IF WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO KEEP THE TRAIL SYSTEM, THAT THEY HAVE AND MONETIZE BY MAKING IT WANT ATTENTION, THEN THEY'RE ALSO PROVIDING FUNDS THAT WE CAN SPEND THROUGHOUT THE REST OF OUR PARK SYSTEM.

I THINK THIS IS A GREAT PATH FORWARD.

>> THANK YOU.

>> WE'VE SPENT A GREAT AMOUNT OF TIME IN DISCUSSION AND TRYING TO GET TO THIS POINT.

I THINK IT'S NOW TO THE PART WHERE IT'S POSSIBLE ACTION ON THIS ITEM.

>> THE ACTION REQUESTED IS THE APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SUBJECT TO LEGAL REVIEW.

I WOULD ALSO ADD THAT ONE OF THE CONDITIONS BE THE CHANGE THAT WE JUST NEGOTIATED.

>> WE'VE HEARD FROM OUR LEGAL COUNSEL A POTENTIAL MOTION WHICH HAS PLEASURE.

>> WHERE I MOVE, WE ADOPT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PRESENTED SUBJECT TO LEGAL APPROVAL AND THE 1.9 BILLION-DOLLAR FEE IN LIEU OF-

[03:55:04]

>> TWO MILLION.

>> TWO MILLION. EXCUSE ME.

>> THAT WAS 1.9.

>> THEY AGREED ON 1.9.

>> WE ALL SAID TWO.

>> HE ASKED FOR 1.9, WE AGREED.

>> THEN HE SAID TWO.

>> I SAID TWO [OVERLAPPING]

>> THERE'S MOTION ON THERE OR? IF THERE'S A SECOND OR THERE'S AN AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION.

>> HE WAS STILL WORKING ON HIS MOTION I THINK OF.

>> THAT WAS IT.

>> IT WAS IT.

>> IT WAS FOR 1.9.

>> OKAY.

>> THAT WHAT YOU SAID?

>> YES, SIR.

>> OKAY.

>>THERE'S WAS A NUMBER THAT'S STUCK IN MY HEAD.

THIS NUMBER I SAID.

>> YOU WANT TO SPLIT IT 1.95? [LAUGHTER]

>> WELL, LIKE TRAVIS SAID, IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE INTERESTS, SO I'LL GO WITH PROBABLY A LITTLE BIT TOO, WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE.

>> [NOISE] MY MOTION TO $1.95 BILLION.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I'M GOOD WITH THAT.

>> I'LL SECOND IT.

>> WE HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GONGORA.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

I'LL CALL FOR A VOTE. ALL THOSE TO FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSE SAME SIGN.

>> AYE.

>> THAT IS FOR TWO MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU, EVERYONE, FOR YOUR PATIENCE AND UNDERSTANDING AND COMMENTS AND TARGETED STOMACHS AND HEADACHES, AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

IF IT MADE YOU UNCOMFORTABLE, I APOLOGIZE, BUT THAT'S WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR-COUNCIL. APPRECIATE IT.

LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU ALL.

>> THANK YOU, SIR. I DID REMEMBER 15 DISCUSSIONS OF

[15. Discussion and possible action on the preliminary plat of Ashland Section 2 (Action Item tabled 4/11/2023)]

POSSIBLE ACTION ON THEIR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLYN'S SECTION 2 ACTION.

THIS WAS AN ITEM THAT WAS TABLED AT THE 411-23 MEETING, MR. OTIS.

>> THANK YOU, MAYOR. THIS IS AN ITEM AS YOU STATED, THAT HAS BEEN TABLED IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SECTION 2 UP ASHLAND.

AS YOU RECALL, THE REASONING BEHIND THE TABLING HAD TO DO WITH WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN TERMS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, THE LOUD MIX AND WHAT HAVE YOU.

THE TEXTUAL CHANGES AND COMMENTS THAT WERE MENTIONED EARLIER HAVE BEEN CLEARED AND THE CITY ENGINEER, AS WELL AS STAFF, HAS FORWARDED THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT TO YOU.

ALTHOUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AS WE STATED EARLIER, FAIL TO MAKE A MOTION AND OFFICIAL ACTION TO USE.

IT'S BEING RECOMMENDED BY STAFF THAT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS PLAT APPROVAL AND THAT THE PRELIMINARY PLAN WOULD MOVE FORWARD.

>> THANK YOU, SIR. JUDITH, ANYTHING YOU NEED TO ADD?

>> THE ONES. YES [OVERLAPPING]

>> NO.

>> THE FACT THAT A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, IT'S JUST BEEN AGREED UPON.

DOES THAT AFFECT HOW THIS IS VIEWED?

>> WELL, THAT WAS THE IMPEDIMENT [OVERLAPPING] AS FAR AS I RECALL.

>> YES, IT WAS.

>> IT WAS GOING TO BE A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL UPON A COMMON AGREEMENT.

HOWEVER, THAT IMPEDIMENT HAS BEEN REMOVED, SO THERE'S NO BASIS TO NOT APPROVE.

>> THAT'S RIGHT.

>> IT WOULD BE THE SAME FOR THE UTILITY PLATS AND ALL THE ONES WE'VE DONE PREVIOUSLY BASED ON THE DA APPROVAL.

>> THANK YOU.

>> THANK YOU.

>> IT'S A PRELIMINARY PLAT [LAUGHTER].

>> WHAT GOOD IS THAT ANYMORE?

>> EVERYTHING'S GOING TO BE SUBJECT TO APPROVALS BY EVERYONE IN THE END IN WHAT IT NEEDS TECHNICALLY.

>> [LAUGHTER] UNTIL THEY SAY THEY ALREADY APPROVED THE PRELIMINARY PLAT THEY AREN'T GOING TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT.

ISN'T THAT WHAT I'VE HEARD BEFORE? WE'LL MAKE A MOTION, WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLAND SECTION 2.

>> FOR FINAL BECAUSE THERE'S A GUY WHO SAID THE REST OF THAT VERBIAGE THAT'S LISTED ON THE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.

MS. JUDITH, DID YOU READ IT THROUGH 36 IF YOU NEED IT? AGAIN, DRAWN IT.

>> THE RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED.

THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ASHLAND SECTION 2, FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION AND PROBE REACTION, SUBJECT TO THE FINAL IMPROVEMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

HOWEVER, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED AND VOTED ON THAT.

WE DON'T HAVE TO DO THAT.

>> JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE DO IT RIGHT.

>> AGREED.

>> THANK YOU. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH, DO I HAVE A SECOND?

>> I'LL SECOND.

>> SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GONGORA.

[04:00:01]

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

>> AYE.

>> ALL THOSE OPPOSING SAME SIGN.

>> AYE.

>> THAT IS FOUR TO TWO.

MOTION CARRIES, AND WE'RE FINISHED WITH ITEM 15. THANK YOU, OTIS.

THANK YOU, MR. MOLLER, AND GROUP.

THAT BRINGS US TO MY LAST PAGE OF THE AGENDA.

IT SAYS ADJOURNMENT. IT IS NOW 10:01.

WE ARE ADJOURNED. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.