Jul 06, 2023 Planning & Zoning Commission

ALL RIGHT. SO WE WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.

[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:04]

WE APOLOGIZE FOR THE DELAY, BUT WE'RE READY TO GO.

[1. Discussion and possible action on the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on June 1, 2023.]

THERE ANY QUESTION, DISCUSSION OR WOULD SOMEONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? MAKE A MOTION WE ACCEPT THE MEETING MINUTES AS ISSUED.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MR. HOGAN.

SECOND BY MISS SPOOR.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE? AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

[2. Consideration of approval of a Preliminary Plat for Windrose Green Section 4 Subdivision. ]

CONSIDER ITEM NUMBER TWO, CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN, SECTION FOUR SUBDIVISION.

MR. SPRIGGS.

ARE YOU GOING TO INTRODUCE THIS? CHECK. ONE, TWO, THREE.

THERE YOU GO. MY APOLOGY I WOULD INTRODUCE HERE CANDICE BUNKER FROM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES WILL INTRODUCE THIS ITEM.

HI. THANK YOU. SO THIS WAS SUBMITTED AND IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER.

UM, IT'S A 65 LOTS TO RESERVES.

IT'S IN THE ETJ. THERE'S BEEN A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WAS SIGNED IN, IN PLACE.

UM, THERE WERE SOME COMMENTS THAT THE ENGINEER HAD.

ALL THOSE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED AND CLEARED.

HE HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BASED ON CONDITIONS THAT THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE RESOLVED WITH THE ANGLETON DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND THE COUNTY ENGINEER DUE TO THE CONNECTION TO THE COUNTY ROAD AND FOR DETENTION AND DRAINAGE ISSUES WITH THE DRAINAGE. THE.

UH, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT WE APPROVE IT WITH THESE CONDITIONS AND THAT THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND OTHER THINGS ARE IN PLACE AND APPROVED BEFORE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

THANK YOU, CANDICE. ANYTHING ELSE? YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? NO, THAT'S OKAY. IN CASE THERE'S SOME BACKGROUND INFORMATION, WE'LL BE GLAD TO PROVIDE THAT TO THE COMMISSION.

WHAT ARE THE LOT SIZES IN THIS IN THIS SECTION? SO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED IS FOR 40 FOOT LOTS, BUT ALL OF THESE LOTS ARE A LITTLE BIT BIGGER.

SECTION FOUR, IF YOU SCROLL DOWN A LITTLE BIT.

OH, THE OTHER WAY. KEEP GOING.

RIGHT THERE. SO MOST OF THESE LOTS ARE AROUND 50.

IN THIS SECTION, THERE'S A COUPLE THAT ARE A LITTLE BIT BIGGER THAT ARE ON THE CORNERS IN THE CUL DE SACS.

UM. WHICH IS ABOVE, I GUESS, THE 40.

ALL RIGHT. SO THIS SECTION IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHICH WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.

IS THAT CORRECT? OKAY. IT WILL BE OF NO SURPRISE TO ANYBODY THAT THIS COMMISSION DOES NOT LOOK KINDLY ON SMALL LOTS, BUT WE'RE SIMPLY A RECOMMENDING BODY.

WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR MAKE A RECOMMENDATION? GOT A QUESTION. MR. HOGAN? WHAT WAS THE ISSUE WITH THE DRAINAGE YOU SAID? DID THEY HAVE ISSUES WITH THAT AT FIRST? THEY'RE JUST WAITING TO GET THE APPROVAL FROM THE DRAINAGE.

THERE'S NO ISSUES.

OKAY. THERE'S SOME MINOR STUFF THAT THEY'RE WORKING OUT.

AND THEN THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT WILL ISSUE A LETTER SAYING WE HAVE NO OBJECTIONS.

SO THEY'RE WAITING TO RECEIVE THAT LETTER.

BUT FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, THERE'S NO MAJOR OUTSTANDING ISSUES.

OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ? SO I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

AND THEN LET'S SEE IF WE GET A SECOND.

THANK YOU. AND AS I TYPICALLY WOULD SAY, WE TRY TO HAVE A COMPLETE RECORD TO CITY COUNCIL DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE ONLY FOUR MEMBERS HERE TODAY TO SEND ANYTHING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

BUT WE WOULD NEED ALL FOUR YESES FOR ANY ITEM TO PASS THIS AFTERNOON.

SO THANK YOU ALL.

AND THEN AS A PART OF THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS, STAFF HAS POINTED OUT THAT THE PLAN MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS REQUIRED IN OUR STATE

[00:05:01]

SO YOU ARE RECOMMENDING MAKING THE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION, SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THEY WERE SATISFIED THE ADD AND COUNTY REQUIREMENTS REGARDING DETENTION AND DRAINAGE.

I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

SO I HAVE A MOTION FOR MYSELF TO APPROVE A SECOND BY MR. HOGAN. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

AYE. AYE. OKAY, SO IT'S 2 TO 2.

AND IS IT FAIR TO PUT IN THE RECORD THAT THE CONCERN WAS WITH LOT SIZE? CORRECT. YES, VERY GOOD.

SO THIS IS JUDITH EL-MASRI, YOUR CITY ATTORNEY, INTERRUPTING.

AND I'M SORRY THAT I'M A VOICE FROM ABOVE YOUR CEILING TILES AND I'M NOT THERE.

BUT I'D LIKE TO TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO REMIND THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION THAT PLAT APPROVAL IS A MINISTERIAL ACT.

THERE IS NO DISCRETION AND THAT IT'S DONE AS A MATTER OF OBLIGATION.

IF YOUR CITY STAFF TELLS YOU THAT IT COMPLIES WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR GENERAL PLAN AND ALL OF THE RULES RELATED TO THE PLATS AND THE SUBDIVISIONS, THEN IT'S A MATTER OF OBLIGATION AND JUST INSERTING THIS REMINDER FOR THE REST OF THE AGENDA.

THANK YOU. YOU'RE WELCOME.

[3. Consideration of approval of a Preliminary Plat for Windrose Green Section 5 Subdivision. ]

CANDACE, ARE YOU GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS ONE AS WELL? YES, SIR. OKAY.

HI THERE. SO THIS ONE IS 67 LOTS AND ONE RESERVE.

IT'S ALSO IN THE ANGLETON ETJ OF THE SAME SUBDIVISION.

IT'S A CONTINUATION, THE SAME DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THAT ALLOWS FOR 40 FOOT LOTS.

NONE OF THESE LOTS ARE 40 FOOT.

THEY START AT 45FT AND THEY GO UP.

THE COMMENTS FROM THE ENGINEER REVIEW HAVE ALL BEEN ADDRESSED AND THE SAME RECOMMENDATION FROM HIM OR NO OBJECTION THAT IT IS APPROVED PENDING THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT AND COUNTY OF APPROVAL FOR THE DRAINAGE AND STREET INFRASTRUCTURE CONNECTIONS.

WE ANTICIPATE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE RESOLVED BEFORE THE FINAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

IS THERE ANY ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS ITEM? I GUESS IT WOULD APPLY TO BOTH TWO AND THREE.

DO YOU KNOW WHEN THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WAS EXECUTED? I BELIEVE IT WAS SIGNED IN 20.

2020. 2020.

OKAY. WE DO HAVE A COPY OF WE DO HAVE A COPY OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IF ANYONE NEEDS TO SEE IT.

I WAS JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE HOW THE COMPOSITION OF COUNCIL HAS CHANGED SINCE THAT TIME.

OKAY. ALSO, I'VE GOT A QUESTION.

AND YOU'RE SAYING I'M OBLIGATED TO APPROVE THIS.

BUT WHEN THIS WAS ALL BEING PRESENTED TO US IN A BREAKDOWN OF SECTIONS AND THE DEVELOPER STOOD IN FRONT OF US AND TOLD US AT THAT TIME, WELL, WE'RE GOING TO START WITH THIS SIZE LOT.

SO AS WE BREAK OUT THE SECTIONS, WE'RE GOING TO LOOK AT AND WE PLAN ON INCREASING LOT SIZE.

THEY DID BY FIVE FEET.

BUT STILL THE CONCERNS THAT WE HAD WERE BEING ALLEVIATED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THAT TIME SAYING NOT TO WORRY, WE'RE GOING TO GET THERE AND I DON'T SEE US GETTING THERE.

SO MAYBE THE COUNCIL AGREED, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE WE WERE IN AGREEMENT AT THAT TIME.

YES, I UNDERSTAND.

AND THEN THERE IS THE OVERALL CONCEPT PLAN.

AND IF IT WILL HELP THE COMMISSION IN THE FUTURE, WE'LL ATTACH THAT DOCUMENT THAT WAY.

YOU SEE THE OVERALL PICTURE.

IT'S KIND OF DIFFICULT WHEN WE DO THE INDIVIDUAL SECTIONS AND OVER TIME YOU DON'T SEE THE FULL CONCEPT PLAN BEFORE YOU IF THAT WILL HELP IN THE FUTURE, WE WILL DO THAT. MR. TENNIS IS HERE FROM CONCOURSE DEVELOPMENT.

IF YOU HAVE SOME PARTICULAR QUESTIONS ABOUT THE MIX OF LOTS AND HOW THEY'RE PROGRESSING BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY DIFFERENT PHASES HE WOULD HAVE, I THINK THAT INFORMATION TO KIND OF ASSURE YOU THAT THERE IS A MIX OF LOT SIZES IN WINDROSE GREEN, BUT THIS IS JUST SECTION FOUR AND FIVE.

I GET THAT. BUT STILL I DON'T SEE WHAT WAS BEING REPRESENTED TO US AT THE TIME WHEN THE QUESTIONS WERE BEING SEVERE ABOUT LOT

[00:10:06]

AND THAT'S PART OF THESE ETJ DEVELOPMENTS BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ZONING AUTHORITY, THE OVERRIDING DOCUMENT IS THE DA AND IT'S OUR RESPONSIBILITY FROM STAFF TO MAKE SURE AND ENSURE COUNCIL THAT WHAT'S BEING PRESENTED TO YOU IS PARALLEL AND IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WHICH LAYS OUT THE LOT, CONFIGURATION AND MIX.

BUT THANK YOU, POINT WELL TAKEN.

GOT A QUICK QUESTION FOR YOU, SIR.

WHAT WAS THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT LOT SIZE? I WASN'T ON THE COMMISSION AT THAT TIME WHEN THIS WAS PRESENTED.

SO UNFORTUNATELY, WHEN WE READ THE DA, IT WILL, NUMBER ONE, HAVE A CONCEPT PLAN WHICH WILL SHOW THE DIFFERENT SECTIONS IN THE MIX.

AND THEN WITHIN THE DOCUMENT THERE ARE SOME STIPULATIONS IN IT.

AND WITHIN THESE SECTIONS THERE'S A STIPULATION THAT THEY THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE SHALL NOT BE LOWER THAN 40FT.

IT'S WHAT'S IN THE DOCUMENT.

OKAY. YES, SIR.

AND DOES THAT APPLY TO THE ENTIRE PROJECT OR JUST CERTAIN SECTIONS? LIKE I SAID, THE ACTUAL MIX, I'LL HAVE TO GET THAT INFORMATION BECAUSE IT'S ON THE DRAWINGS IF YOU NEED IT, OR MR. TENANTS, IF YOU HAVE ANY MORE INFORMATION, YOU YOU'RE WELCOME TO PRESENT IT.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, YEAH.

OKAY. IF YOU'RE ABLE TO ANSWER WHAT THE COMPOSITION OF THE LOTS THAT ARE PRESENTLY CONSTRUCTED AND EITHER FOR SALE OR OCCUPIED, I WOULD IF YOU KNOW THAT AND ARE ABLE TO SPEAK TO IT, I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW.

OR CAITLIN IF YOU KNOW.

OH, YEAH. I'M SORRY.

HI, I'M CAITLIN KING WITH META PLANNING AND DESIGN.

I'M THE APPLICANT.

I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE LOTS THAT ARE ACTUALLY ON THE GROUND.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE'RE KIND OF INVOLVED MORE AT THE BEGINNING.

I WILL SAY IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE DA COVERS THE ENTIRETY OF THE PROJECT, WHICH WAS DEFINED IN THE DA.

SO THE CONCEPT PLAN THAT OTIS IS REFERRING TO, ALONG WITH LIKELY METES AND BOUNDS, WILL KIND OF ESTABLISH OUR BOUNDARY OF THE PROJECT.

AND AS LONG AS WE STAY WITHIN THOSE BOUNDARIES, ANY LOTS WITHIN IT WILL COMPLY WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

AND ANYTHING NOT COVERED IN THAT WOULD DEFER TO THE LDC.

OKAY. THANK YOU.

YEAH. SEEMS TO ME THAT WE CAN ONLY HOPE THAT THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION AND COUNCIL WILL BE MORE DISCERNING.

MM. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, AS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND SUBJECT IT TO ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS OR CORRECTIONS THAT NEED TO BE MADE AND RECOMMEND CITY COUNCIL TAKE FINAL ACTION ON THE ITEM. OKAY.

I'LL SECOND THAT.

MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND.

THE SECOND BY MISS SPOOR.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

ALL RIGHT. ITEM FOUR, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AUSTIN COLONY, SECTION ONE A, FINAL PLAT.

[4. Discussion and possible action on Austin Colony Section 1A Final Plat]

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS AUSTIN COLONY.

SECTION 1 A, SPECIFICALLY, YOU'RE BEING ASKED THIS AFTERNOON TO CONSIDER THIS PLAT.

WE HAVE FORWARDED AUSTIN COLONY TO THE CITY ENGINEER WHO HAS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW SECTION 1A.

THERE WERE SOME CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS THAT WERE INITIALLY GIVEN TO US IN WHICH WE'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO BRING THOSE BEFORE THE CITY ENGINEER AND JESS ON TODAY.

UNFORTUNATELY NOT BEFORE THE POSTING OF THE AGENDA.

THERE WERE SOME COMMENTS THAT WERE CLEARED BY THE CITY ENGINEER IN WHICH YOU'VE BEEN COPIED ON.

ALL OF THOSE, AS YOU SEE IN THE REPORT, HAVE BEEN CLEARED WITH THE NOTION THAT FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS WOULD BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL PRIOR TO COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION OF THE PLAT.

AND AGAIN HERE THAT ADA ADD REQUIREMENTS REGARDING THE LOT CONFIGURATIONS WOULD BE COORDINATED IN TERMS OF DRAINAGE AND RIGHT OF WAY.

BUT OTHER THAN THAT, THIS WOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.

AS YOU KNOW, THIS IS A PD PLAN, DISTRICT THREE JUST RECENTLY CANCELED BY THE DEVELOPER'S REQUEST, DID MAKE SOME MODIFICATIONS TO THE TRAFFIC FLOW IN TERMS OF THE DESIGNATION OF AUSTIN COLONY BOULEVARD TO A LOCAL STREET.

[00:15:06]

SO WE BASICALLY KEPT THE SAME LOT CONFIGURATION.

YOU HAD A MIXTURE OF LOTS AS PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THE PD DISTRICT, THERE IS A PLAN THAT SHOWS THE LAYOUT OF THE LOTS.

THIS PARTICULAR SECTION HAS A MIX OF, I THINK BOTH 60FT, MAYBE A COUPLE, A FEW, 50FT LOTS.

BUT IT MEETS THE THRESHOLDS THAT WERE ORIGINALLY APPROVED BY COUNCIL AS PART OF THE DOCUMENTS MENTIONED.

SO AS PART OF THIS, WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD APPROVE THIS, SEND IT ON THE COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION WITH THOSE STIPULATED COMMENTS BY THE CITY ENGINEER AND ALSO SUBJECT TO THE DA, WHICH HAS TO BE MANIPULATED ALSO AND APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.

THAT HAS NOT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HAS NOT BEEN CHANGED TO REFLECT THE CHANGES THAT NEED BE MADE FOR THE STREETS YET? LEGAL AND STAFF HAS THE DOCUMENT THAT HAS BEEN MODIFIED.

BUT WE HAVE TO OF COURSE CHECK THE PID AND ALL OF THOSE REQUIREMENTS OF PARKLAND AND WE'RE COORDINATING TO MAKE SURE IT MET THE THRESHOLD OF THE ORIGINAL DA. SO THE DRAFT IS OUT.

WE'RE ABOUT TO FORWARD IT BACK TO THE APPLICANT AND WE HOPE TO HAVE IT NEGOTIATED THROUGH COUNCIL BY THE TIME THIS PLAT HITS COUNCIL.

BUT WE FEEL CONFIDENT IT COULD BE DONE.

IT'S JUST THE BACK AND FORTH NEGOTIATIONS, OKAY, BUT IT MEETS THE SPIRIT AND INTENT.

OKAY. WITH SOME CHANGES I THINK THAT WOULD NEED TO BE MADE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I MOVE, WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR SECTION ONE A OF AUSTIN COLONY AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION AND ACTION.

I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY MS..

TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MR. HOGAN. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? AND THIS IS FULLY IN THE CITY LIMITS.

AND IF THERE'S NO OTHER DISCUSSION, THEN I'LL CALL THE QUESTION.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE? AYE. OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.

OKAY. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM FIVE, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FINAL PLAT OF THE ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION SECTION ONE AND RESERVES.

[5. Discussion and possible action on the Final Plat of the Ashland Street Dedication Sec 1 and Reserves.]

SO YOU'LL SEE A SERIES OF PLATS TO COME FOR THE REST OF THE AGENDA REGARDING THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT.

WE WILL SAY THAT THE DA HAS BEEN APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL AS WELL AS NEGOTIATED WITH THE APPLICANT AND IT HAS BEEN SIGNED.

WE DO HAVE A COPY OF IT JUST IN CASE ANYONE NEEDED TO SEE IT.

HOWEVER, THESE PLATS WOULD SET THE GROUND LEVEL IN TERMS OF UTILITIES THAT WILL OF COURSE SUPPORT THE SECTIONS TO COME.

AND ALSO YOU SEE A LOT OF STREET DEDICATIONS THIS AFTERNOON THAT ARE PART OF THAT PLAT AND IT WOULD ALSO FACILITATE THE SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION AS WELL.

SO THE FIRST ONE YOU HAVE NUMBER FIVE, SECTION ONE RESERVES TO TAKE CARE OF ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION NUMBER ONE IS BEFORE YOU FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE FINAL PLAT.

AND THEN YOU WERE LISTED A NUMBER OF CONDITIONS BY THE CITY ENGINEERS.

SO ANY RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL WOULD BE THAT THESE ITEMS ARE CLEARED BEFORE THE COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION.

WE FEEL CONFIDENT.

GOT A MESSAGE FROM THE PROJECT TEAM THAT THE CHANGES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND WILL BE COORDINATED WITH OUR CITY ENGINEER AND WE HAVE FULL CONFIDENCE THAT THEY'LL BE CLEARED BY THE TIME CITY COUNCIL WOULD SEE THIS.

AND THEN THERE IS SOME SUBJECT APPROVALS OF COURSE BY ADA ADD FOR THE DRAINAGE AS WELL AS THE COUNTY AND THEN OF COURSE THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY COORDINATION, ALL OF THAT WOULD BE THE CONDITIONS OF THE APPROVAL.

SO THIS IS A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, AS NOTED.

SO SO THIS IS IN THE ETJ, CORRECT? IT IS PART OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, PART OF A DA AGREEMENT, NOT PLANNED DISTRICT.

OKAY. THANK YOU. AND ALL WE'RE DOING HERE IS DEFINING THE AREAS PORTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS FOR STREETS.

IS THAT CORRECT? IN THIS INSTANCE, YES.

THIS IS A STREET DEDICATION..

AS ARE THE NEXT TWO..

THAT WOULD SERVE THE FUTURE SECTIONS.

YES. OKAY. AND TO ME, THIS ITEM FIVE, SECTION ONE DEDICATION SEEMS TO BE MAYBE LIKE THERE MAYBE A MAIN ENTRANCE, LIKE A WIDER.

[00:20:01]

CAITLYN OR STEVE, YOU'RE WELCOME TO ELABORATE.

AND IT'S GOING TO BE 120 FOOT WIDE.

EITHER SOME SORT OF BOULEVARD OR SOME.

YEAH, IF YOU DON'T MIND SCROLLING BACK UP TO THE SECTION ONE PLAT JUST SO THEY CAN GET A CLOSER LOOK.

I WASN'T THE APPLICANT ON THE FINAL PLATS.

I DID THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SO I CAN SPEAK ON THE DESIGN, BUT NOT REALLY WHAT'S GOING INTO THE FINAL PLATS? YEAH. IF YOU WANT TO STOP RIGHT THERE.

AND IF YOU COULD ZOOM IN JUST A LITTLE BIT ON THAT STREET SO THEY CAN I BELIEVE IT'S A 120 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY.

IT IS A SPLIT BOULEVARD.

SO THIS WILL BE THE MAIN ENTRANCE INTO TO THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHT OFF OF 521.

YOU'VE GOT A LITTLE BIT OF DETENTION AND THE REC CENTER AREA ALSO.

BUT IT IS JUST STREETS AND RESERVES RIGHT NOW.

THERE ARE NO LOTS IN THIS.

AND I MEAN, THE WAY I'M SEEING IT AND PLEASE CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, IT DOESN'T EVEN LOOK LIKE HOMES WOULD BE ON THIS STREET.

THEY MIGHT BACK UP TO IT, BUT.

. CORRECT. OKAY. NONE OF THE DEDICATIONS ON THE AGENDA TODAY ARE FRONTED BY LOTS, SO LOTS WILL USE THE STREETS TO GET TO THEIR HOMES. BUT NO DRIVEWAYS OR ANYTHING TO RESIDENTIAL LOTS WILL BE OFF OF THESE STREETS.

MM. ARE YOU READY FOR MOTION? I'M READY. OKAY. I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THIS FINAL PLAT CONDITIONED ON ANY OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING AND DRAINAGE COMMENTS AS BEING CLEARED AS NOTED.

IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

A MOTION BY MS.. TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MR. HOGAN. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM SIX, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FINAL PLAT OF ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION SECTION TWO.

[6. Discussion and possible action on the Final Plat of the Ashland Street Dedication Sec 2.]

THIS IS STREET DEDICATION, SECTION TWO AS NOTED, WE HAVE COPIED YOU ON THE NUMBER OF CONDITIONS BY THE CITY ENGINEER REGARDING THE REVIEW OF SECTION TWO HERE.

AND YOU CAN KEEP ROLLING, IF YOU DON'T MIND.

GRACE. THIS IS ANOTHER STREET DEDICATION, AS WE ALLUDED TO EARLIER, WHICH I THINK IS ESSENTIAL FOR THE FUTURE PHASES OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

AND WE'VE NOTED THE CONDITIONS OF THE CITY ENGINEER.

WE ANTICIPATE THEM TO BE CLEARED BY THE TIME COUNCIL WOULD MAKE FINAL ACTION ON THIS PLAT.

THIS IS A FINAL PLAT, ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION NUMBER TWO FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TO COUNCIL.

THANK YOU, MR. SPRIGGS.

IS THERE ANY QUESTIONS? ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE FINAL PLAQUE CONDITION ON THE ANY ENGINEERS COMMENTS STILL OUTSTANDING OR STAFF COMMENTS AND BEING CLEARED AS NOTED.

IN THOSE CONDITIONS.

THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND, SIR.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MS..

TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MR. HOGAN. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM SEVEN, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE FINAL PLAT OF THE ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION.

[7. Discussion and possible action on the Final Plat of the Ashland Street Dedication Sec 3.]

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS.

THIS IS, OF COURSE, SECTION THREE, SAPPHIRE SPRINGS TRAIL, A 75 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY, ALSO UP FOR CONSIDERATION FOR THE FINAL PLAT.

I THINK THERE ARE ABOUT SEVEN COMMENTS BY THE CITY ENGINEER THAT YOU SAW IN THE STAFF REPORT.

WE ANTICIPATE THESE TO BE CLEARED THIS WEEK AND DEFINITELY BY THE TIME OF FINAL ACTION OF THE COUNCIL.

SO THIS IS BEING RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL BASED ON THOSE CONDITIONS.

ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I MOVE. WE APPROVE THIS FINAL PLAT CONDITION ON ANY STAFF OR ENGINEERING COMMENTS BEING CLEARED AS NOTED IN THREE CONDITIONS.

IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND.

SO I HAVE A MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND.

A SECOND BY MISS SPOOR.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.

[00:25:01]

[8. Discussion and possible action on the Final Plat of the Ashland Coral Haven Lane Street Dedication]

AND THANK YOU. THIS IS SPECIFICALLY CORAL HAVEN STREET DEDICATION IS NOTED RIGHT OFF OF 521.

THIS PLAT IS BEING RECOMMENDED, I THINK, WITH TEN CONDITIONS, SO IT WOULD BE A CONDITIONAL PLAT BEFORE THE COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.

WE FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THESE TEXTUAL CHANGES WILL BE CORRECTED BY THE TIME COUNCIL MAKES ITS FINAL ACTION.

OKAY. I DO HAVE QUESTIONS PERHAPS ABOUT THIS ONE BECAUSE IT ALSO COMES OFF OF 521, CORRECT? YES. SO.

BUT IT IS ONLY WHAT I'M SEEING IN MY MATERIALS.

70FT VERSUS 120.

YES, THIS ONE IS A LITTLE BIT MORE NARROW.

THIS ONE ISN'T A MAIN ENTRY.

IT'LL BE KIND OF MORE OF A BACK DOOR FOR SOME OF THOSE SECTIONS.

AND THEN I BELIEVE THE SCHOOL WILL HAVE A DRIVEWAY OFF OF THAT STREET.

SO. I.

BEING THE PARENT OF SCHOOL AGED CHILDREN AND KNOWING WHAT SCHOOLS CAN DO TO TRAFFIC PATTERNS IS I MEAN, I GUESS IS THAT NOT ANYBODY NOBODY'S CONCERNED ABOUT THAT, THAT WE MIGHT HAVE A SCHOOL DRIVEWAY DUMPING ONTO A NARROWER STREET.

I BELIEVE THAT IT IS COMPLIANT WITH THE MINIMUM REGULATIONS.

ADDITIONALLY, I DON'T BELIEVE IT'S THE SCHOOL'S MAIN ENTRANCE.

I CAN'T SPEAK FULLY.

I'M NOT INVOLVED WITH THE SCHOOL'S DESIGNS, BUT THEY WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL ACCESS POINTS.

AND I WILL SAY THAT WE'VE BEEN CONTACTED.

THEY'RE READY TO SUBMIT THE PLATS FOR THE SCHOOL AND WHICH YOU HAVE NOT SEEN.

AND THE CORRIDORS AND ACCESS POINTS ARE UNDER CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNTY.

AND I WILL ASSURE YOU THAT THEY ARE LOOKING CLOSER AT THIS EVEN THAN WE ARE.

BUT WE WILL BE ABLE TO MAKE COMMENTS ON THAT FINAL PLAT AND THE ACCESS POINTS AS WELL.

SIGNALIZATION, YOU KNOW WHAT CAME ABOUT IN THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY, SO YOU MAKE SOME VERY IMPORTANT COMMENTS.

OKAY. SO I GUESS THEN IS I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND YOU SAID SOMETHING ABOUT THIS BEING A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL.

WOULD THIS PERHAPS BE A LITTLE PREMATURE? MAYBE THIS ISN'T A RIPE ISSUE THAT..

AT THIS POINT, IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A CONDITION THAT THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS, AS OPPOSED AS IT CONCERNS THE SCHOOL ACCESS IS CONSIDERED AND APPLIED HERE, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO DO THAT.

YEAH, BUT YOU'RE PUTTING THEM ON NOTICE TO MAKE SURE THAT, HEY, WHEN WE SEE THE PLAT FOR THE SCHOOL, WE DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS AS A MAJOR ACCESS BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WE CAN'T SEE WHERE THE ACCESS POINTS ARE.

WELL, AND I GUESS MY FLIP SIDE TO THAT CONCERN THEN IS I DON'T WANT TO RESTRICT THE SCHOOL IF THEY NEED TO PLAT FOR A CERTAIN WAY FOR THE SAFETY OF THE KIDS OR THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC OR WHATEVER.

SO TO ME, I GUESS MAYBE I'M MAKING MORE OF A COMMENT THAN A QUESTION RIGHT NOW.

BUT IT JUST MY CONCERN IS THAT US APPROVING THIS STREET AS IT IS RIGHT NOW WITHOUT KNOWING MAYBE WHAT EXACTLY WILL BE TYING INTO IT COULD BE PREMATURE THAT WE MAY BE TYING OUR OWN HANDS DOWN THE ROAD.

I'M WITH YOU. SO I DON'T THINK WE'RE WE'RE CAUSING A PROBLEM BECAUSE ALL THE MAJOR CORRIDORS HAVE BEEN CLASSIFIED.

THIS IS MORE OF A MORE OF A LOCAL ARTERIAL, MORE THAN A COLLECTOR ROAD.

AND ITS FUNCTION, I THINK, WILL BE ACCORDING TO THE WAY IT'S DESIGNED.

SO YOU WON'T SEE A HIGH VOLUME ACCESS TO THE SCHOOL AT THIS POINT AS SHE'S ALERTED TO.

MY CONCERN IS I'VE SEEN SOME PEOPLE USING SOME RESIDENTIAL ROADS PROBABLY AS THEY WERE NOT DESIGNED TO TRY AND GET THEIR CHILDREN TO SCHOOL QUICKER.

SO I DON'T IT'S YEAH, IT'S DEFINITELY OKAY.

I SEE IT ON ROAD EVERY DAY, ESPECIALLY WHEN TRYING TO GO TO THE FIRE STATION FOR A FIRE CALL.

YEAH, RIGHT.

OKAY. I DON'T.

DO YOU? I GUESS.

NO. I'M SORRY. I DIDN'T WANT TO INTERRUPT ANY CONVERSATIONS.

THESE ROADWAYS HAVE BEEN COORDINATED WITH THE SCHOOLS AS TO TO WHAT THEY WANT AND HOW THEY WANT IT AND HOW IT FITS THEIR PLAT.

OBVIOUSLY, WHEN WE DO THINGS AROUND SCHOOLS, WE HAVE TWO THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH OBVIOUSLY TRAFFIC AND GETTING THINGS IN AND OUT, BUT THERE'S ALSO A CONCERN ABOUT ROADS BEING TOO BIG BECAUSE IT ENCOURAGES PEOPLE TO GO TOO FAST WHEN WE HAVE KIDS.

SO THIS IS NOT THE MAIN ENTRANCE.

THIS WAS COORDINATED WITH THEIR PLAT.

I DON'T THINK WE'RE RUNNING INTO ISSUES BECAUSE THERE'S A VERY CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE SCHOOLS AND THIS WAS AT THEIR DIRECTION.

[00:30:04]

IF THE SCHOOLS WERE TO COME BACK LATER AND SAY WE NEED AN EXTRA FIVE FEET, WE WOULD SIMPLY RE AND AMEND THE PLAT.

WE DON'T THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BECAUSE WE'VE ALREADY COORDINATED WITH THEM.

WE'VE COORDINATED WITH THE COUNTY.

EVERYBODY IS ON BOARD WITH THAT.

SO I APPRECIATE THE CONCERNS.

BUT THERE ARE CERTAINLY TIMES IN TRAFFIC PLANNING WHERE SOMETIMES BIGGER IS BETTER AND SOMETIMES NARROWER IS BETTER.

AND THIS IS A BACK DOOR.

WE ARE NOT TRYING TO MAKE IT A BACK DOOR.

WE ARE TRYING TO FUNNEL THE TRAFFIC WHERE IT'S DESIGNED TO BE FUNNELED.

BUT WE DO NEED THAT SAFETY FOR A SAFETY STANDPOINT, THAT SECONDARY POINT OF ACCESS.

SO FOR THE SAFETY OF YOUR RESIDENTS, FOR LIKE EMERGENCY SERVICES.

FOR THE SAFETY OF EVERYBODY.

OKAY. AND STEVE, IF YOU DON'T MIND, I'M SORRY, INTRODUCING YOURSELF FOR THE RECORD.

I'M SORRY. MY NAME IS STEVE HOAGLAND.

I'M THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING FOR QUIDDITY ENGINEERING.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.

SO WITH ALL OF THAT.

WHAT IS YOUR INCLINATION? WOULD YOU ALL LIKE TO SEE THE CONCEPT PLAN? I HAVE IT HERE. I CAN PASS IT.

I GUESS I'D BE MORE CURIOUS TO SEE THE PLANS THAT MAYBE Y'ALL DON'T HAVE YET.

EXACTLY LIKE HOW THIS SCHOOL TRAFFIC WOULD TIE INTO THIS.

BUT I'LL SAY THIS, I WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THIS FINAL PLAT CONDITIONED ON CITY STAFF, ENGINEERS, COUNTY DRAINAGE, SCHOOL DISTRICT.

EVERY ENTITY THAT YOU KNOW WOULD BE IMPACTED BY THIS CONDITIONED ON THEIR PLATING AND APPROVAL, COMMENTS AND CONDITIONS. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT MAKES IT TOO HARD FOR YOU.

I THINK THAT'S FAIR.

AND TO EXPLAIN THEIR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS THAT ARE SET UP WITH THE CITY, THERE ARE SOME WITH THE COUNTY GOING ON THAT SOME FORM OF AGREEMENT BEING SET UP WITH AD NECESSARILY MAY NOT BE A DA, BUT IT'S AN AGREEMENT TO SATISFY THEIR REQUIREMENTS.

AND THEN ALL OF THE TRAFFIC COORDINATION AND ANY TO BE APPROVED BY THE COUNTY AND I ENSURE YOU THAT THAT'S A PART OF THEIR DA AS WELL.

SO WHAT YOU SAID I THINK IS FAIR AND UNDERSTANDABLE.

WOULD THAT ALSO INCLUDE THE STATE SINCE IT'S COMING OUT ON FM..

ANY TYPE OF STATE RIGHT OF WAYS THEY HAVE TO DO THE TIE IN AT THAT INTERSECTION AND DESIGN IT ACCORDINGLY WITH PERMISSION.

ARE YOU GOOD WITH THE MOTION? WE HAVE IT RECORDED.

OKAY. AND WE WILL.

WE WILL DICTATE IT.

SO NOTED. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. SO.

SO THAT WAS YOUR MOTION? MY MOTION? WOULD SOMEONE LIKE TO SECOND THAT MOTION SECOND? OKAY, I HEARD MISS SPOOR FIRST.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND.

AND THE SECOND BY MISS SPOOR.

TO APPROVE. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE? AYE. OPPOSED. SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

PAGE TWO.

[9. Discussion and possible action on the Final Plat for Ashland Development Wastewater Treatment Plant. ]

THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS, YOU HAVE THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT PLAT BEFORE YOU THIS IS IN CONSIDERATION FOR UTILITIES TO BE SET UP FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED EARLIER.

THE CITY ENGINEER HAS GIVEN YOU NINE TEXTURAL CHANGES THAT THEY'RE RECOMMENDING ON THE PLAT.

WE FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT THESE TO US SOMETIMES PRIOR TO THE COUNCIL MEETING.

SO OUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE TO APPROVE THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT SUBJECT TO THOSE CONDITIONS FOR FINAL COUNCIL ACTION.

SO JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE'RE NOT APPROVING ANY DETAILS OF THE ACTUAL TREATMENT PLANT.

THIS IS JUST US SAYING, YOU WANT TO PUT IT ON THIS LAND, YOU'RE DESIGNATING THIS LAND FOR THIS, AND WE'RE GOOD WITH THAT IF WE APPROVE IT.

IF YOU HAVE SEEN, I THINK THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, WE HAVE INCLUDED ALL CONSTRUCTION DOCS TYPICALLY FOR THE TREATMENT PLANTS.

THOSE ARE CURRENTLY BEING CONSIDERED BY THE COUNTY WITH CITY REVIEW AND OUR CITY ENGINEER WOULD BE REVIEWING THOSE.

SO ALL I HAD IN MY PACKET WAS PLATS.

RIGHT, BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ACTING ON.

OKAY. YEAH. BUT I THINK WHAT YOU SAID IS CORRECT.

IT'S. WE'RE JUST SAYING THAT WHERE YOU WANT TO PUT THIS THING..

FINE. YOU'RE NOT APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION.

WHAT WILL BE AROUND IT? THERE'S A VICINITY MAP I THINK THERE.

[00:35:03]

RIGHT. IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S IN THE VERY SOUTHERNMOST PORTION.

THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, I BELIEVE, IS IN THE VERY SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE TRACT.

AND IF YOU HAVE THE CONCEPT PLAN, IT WOULD PROBABLY GIVE YOU A GOOD VISUAL.

I CAN KIND OF POINT IT OUT WHERE IT IS.

I BELIEVE IT'S MOSTLY DETENTION, JUST A LITTLE BIT BACK DOWN, DOWN, DOWN, DOWN, STOP UP IN THAT TOP CORNER.

I THINK THEY'LL GO TO THE TOP RIGHT CORNER.

CAN YOU SLIDE SLIDE IT OVER TO THE RIGHT.

TO THE RIGHT. GO TO.

YEAH. THERE YOU GO.

OKAY. I THINK IT'S RIGHT HERE IN THIS AREA.

OKAY. SO WATER IS UP HERE.

AND THEN THE NEXT SLIDE DOWN THE ANCHOR ROAD FOR THE WASTEWATER THEN, RIGHT? YEAH. OKAY.

THANK YOU. OKAY.

AND WHERE WAS THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS RIGHT HERE ON THE NORTH END.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT.

WASTEWATER IS DOWN HERE.

WATER IS UP HERE. WATERS UPPER.

YEAH. OKAY.

DON'T WANT THEM TO MIX.

YEAH. OKAY.

OTHER QUESTIONS.

MOTIONS. I'LL MOVE.

WE APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT, INCLUDING RESERVES SUBJECT TO ANY ENGINEERING OR CITY STAFF.

COMMENTS BEING SATISFIED.

THANK YOU. SECOND.

I'LL SECOND. MOTION BY MISS HOGAN.

SECOND BY MR..

EXCUSE ME. MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND.

SECOND BY MR. HOGAN.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM TEN, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A FINAL PLAT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT WATER PLANT.

[10. Discussion and possible action on a Final Plat for Ashland Development Water Plant]

SAME HERE. WE ANTICIPATE THEM TO CLEAR THOSE WITHIN THE COUPLE OF WEEKS TO COME AND WE'LL HAVE THIS CLEARED BEFORE COUNCIL.

SO THIS IS SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS NOTED.

I THINK THERE ARE NINE CONDITIONS THERE SUBJECT TO THE ENGINEERING COMMENTS.

THEY'RE BEING FORWARDED TO COUNCIL WITH A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION.

OKAY. CAITLIN WAS KIND ENOUGH TO SHOW US WHERE THAT WAS.

THANK YOU, CAITLIN. AND THIS IS ALL BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT ON CITY WATER AND SEWER, RIGHT? SO THEY HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF THE WATER.

PLANT IS BEING DEDICATED HERE WITH THE TWO ACRES FOR THEM TO TAKE CARE OF THE WATER SERVICE.

WHERE IS THEIR WATER COMING FROM? THAT MAY BE A BIT OFF TOPIC.

SORRY. SO THE DETAILS OF WATER BEING PURCHASED THROUGH THE BWA ARE BEING WORKED OUT BY THE DEVELOPER. YES.

ALL RIGHT. AND IT IS IT WOULD BE IN THE MUD 82 THAT WE RECENTLY APPROVED OR CONSENTED TO AT CITY COUNCIL.

WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I MOVE WE APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT WATER PLANT CONTAINING ONE RESERVE, ONE BLOCK SUBJECT TO ANY OUTSTANDING CITY STAFF AND ENGINEER'S COMMENTS BEING SATISFIED.

IS THERE A RACE FOR THE SECOND? SECOND. SECOND, MR. HOGAN. ALL RIGHT.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MS..

TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MR. HOGAN TO APPROVE.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE? AYE. OPPOSED. SAME SIGN.

MOTION CARRIES.

AND IF YOU DON'T MIND, BEFORE YOU CLOSE, I HAVE A QUICK COMMENT.

JUST WANTED TO REPORT TO THE COMMISSION THAT THE WORK SESSION HAS BEEN POSTPONED DUE TO SOME CONFLICTS IN THE SCHEDULE.

WE WILL REVAMP AND GET IN TOUCH WITH YOU WITH A POSSIBLE DATE, SEPTEMBER, OCTOBER FOR THE WORK SESSION.

I DO APOLOGIZE, BUT WE WILL KEEP YOU INFORMED AND COME UP WITH ANOTHER DATE WITH CITY COUNCIL SO IT WILL NOT OCCUR ON JULY THE 11TH.

THANK YOU FOR THAT UPDATE.

THANK YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU THIS AFTERNOON TAKING YOUR TIME OUT OF YOUR SCHEDULE.

AND WE ARE ADJOURNED FOR LUNCH.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.