2. Discussion and possible action to approve the minutes of the Parks & Recreation Board meeting of February 12, 2024.

[3. Discuss and possible action on CIP priorities for the Angleton Recreation Center and Parks and Right-of-Way divisions for fiscal year 2024-2025.]

THIS IS THE LONG ONE.

I THINK I'M WORRIED.

OKAY. THIS IS DISCUSSED.

POSSIBLE ACTION ON CIP, PRIORITIES FOR THE ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER AND PARKS AND RIGHT OF WAY DIVISIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2425.

YES. SO.

YES, CLAIRE. THANK YOU.

WE DO AS THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD.

YOU ALL HAVE THREE DUTIES, WHICH IS LISTED HERE IN YOUR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.

THE BOARD IS TO REVIEW AND MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PARKS DIRECTOR.

SO IF YOU HAVE SOMETHING THAT IS ON YOUR MIND THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE ADDRESSED, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT YOU WOULD BRING TO ME AND WE WOULD BRING TO THE BOARD FOR REVIEW SUBMIT ANNUALLY TO THE PARKS DIRECTOR NO LESS THAN 60 DAYS PRIOR TO THE BEGINNING OF THE BUDGET YEAR, A LISTING OF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PARKS AND RECREATION.

SO THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING YOU TONIGHT IS A LIST OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS.

THESE ARE DERIVED FROM THE 2019 MASTER AND STRATEGIC PLAN, WHAT WE HAD DONE HISTORICALLY.

OUR MASTER STRATEGIC PLAN IS OUTLINED IN SHORT, MID AND LONG TERM GOALS, ALL OF WHICH ARE INCLUDE THE CIP PROJECTS.

HISTORICALLY, WE HAVE RANKED THEM AS STAFF IN PRIORITY ORDER.

IF IT WAS A SHORT MID TERM OR LONG TERM GOAL, THAT HAS CHANGED SIGNIFICANTLY OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS.

WHEN WE'VE BROUGHT THESE CIP PROJECTS TO EITHER THE PARKS BOARD, ANGLETON, BETTER LIVING CORPORATION AND EVEN CITY COUNCIL.

[00:05:06]

SO WHAT WE DID THIS YEAR WAS WE PRIORITIZED THE ITEMS THAT WERE PROJECTS THAT ARE NOT YET COMPLETE, THAT EITHER HAVE FUNDING OR HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED MOST RECENTLY AS A PROJECT PRIORITY.

SO JUST BECAUSE IT IS FUNDED, IT MAY NOT MEAN THAT IT WAS A PRIORITY IN THE MASTER AND STRATEGIC PLAN, BUT IT HAS BEEN MADE A PRIORITY EITHER BY ABC OR CITY COUNCIL.

SO WHAT WE ARE PRESENTING TO YOU TONIGHT IS A REPRIORITIZATION, IF YOU WILL, OF OUR CIP PROJECTS BASED ON THE MASTER AND STRATEGIC PLAN.

SO WE WOULD LIKE TO OPEN IT UP FOR DISCUSSION FOR YOU ALL.

AND HOPE YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THOSE ITEMS. I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT SOME OF THEM.

SURE, A LOT OF THEM DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING FOR 20.

WELL, ONLY THE ADA ONE HAS HAD SOMETHING FOR 2024, I NOTICED.

SO IF YOU LOOK AT ADA THESE THIS WAS ADOPTED WITH THE ADA TRANSITION PLAN BY CITY COUNCIL.

SO WHAT THAT ADA TRANSITION PLAN DID WAS WE ACTUALLY STARTED IT.

WE'RE IN OUR SECOND YEAR THE FIRST YEAR PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY FOR PARKS AND THE RECREATION CENTER, WHICH FALL IN OUR DEPARTMENT, WERE FUNDED BY PARKLAND DEDICATION. THOSE WERE APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL TO USE PARKLAND DEDICATION FUNDS TO ADDRESS THOSE ADA ITEMS. FISCAL YEAR, THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR THAT WE'RE IN RIGHT NOW WE WERE NOT BUDGETED AT ANY DOLLARS FOR ADA PROJECTS.

SO WE ARE TRYING TO COMPLETE WHAT HAPPENED THOSE ITEMS THROUGH OUR OPERATIONAL ACCOUNT.

BUT WHAT IS NOT COMPLETE DUE TO LACK OF FUNDING, WE HAVE TO COMPOUND FORWARD THIS WITH NEXT FISCAL YEAR.

I'VE DONE THIS. WHAT YOU SEE IN FISCAL YEAR 2025 IS JUST BASICALLY WHAT IT NORMALLY WOULD HAVE BEEN IN ADDITION TO YOU WHAT WAS NOT THERE THIS YEAR DUE TO LACK OF DOWN.

AND THEN IF YOU LOOK AT ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER, RENO, WE WERE APPROVED THROUGH ABLC MOST RECENT DEBT ISSUANCE.

YOU SEE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED.

THAT'S BECAUSE IT WAS APPROVED THIS FISCAL YEAR.

SO IT'S NOT NEXT FISCAL YEAR.

CIP, AND WHAT WE WOULD ASK FOR FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR IS AN ADDITIONAL $200,000 TO CONTINUE ADDRESSING MAINTENANCE, DEFERRED MAINTENANCE ISSUES AT THE ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER. SO IT'S IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT THE PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED FUNDS, TOO, BECAUSE THAT INCLUDES THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN BUDGETED THIS YEAR.

SO THAT WAS ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER, THAT IS PAGE EIGHT IN YOUR PACKET.

IF YOU CONTINUE, ABIGAIL ARIAS PARK, THAT'S ANOTHER DEBT ISSUANCE FUNDED PROJECT WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED.

LAND WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED IN A PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR, BUT THE PLANNING AND DESIGN IN THE AMOUNT OF $2 MILLION WAS BUDGETED AND FUNDED THIS APRIL.

SO APRIL 3RD ACTUALLY IS WHEN WE RECEIVE FUNDS FOR THIS PARK DEVELOPMENT.

AND SO WE DON'T HAVE ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THIS NEXT FISCAL YEAR BUDGETED BECAUSE THEY WERE BUDGETED THIS CURRENT FISCAL YEAR, IF THAT MAKES SENSE.

IF WE FIND ONCE WE GET THROUGH DESIGN AND WE BID OUT THE PROJECT, IT'S OVER $2 MILLION AND WE NEED TO GO BACK TO ABLC FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDING, OR WE APPLY FOR A TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE GRANT, AND CITY COUNCIL DECIDES TO PROVIDE THE MATCHING PORTION OF THAT THROUGH THEIR FUND BALANCE.

THAT'S WHEN YOU'RE GOING TO SEE A REFLECTION IN NEXT FISCAL YEAR, HAVING ANY SORT OF FUNDS DEDICATED EITHER THROUGH GRANT, GENERAL FUND, ABLC, PARKLAND DEDICATION, ETC.. SO THAT MAY BE WHY YOU'RE YOU'RE NOTING OR SEEING THAT THINGS AREN'T BUDGETED FOR NEXT YEAR BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T BEEN.

SO ONCE CITY COUNCIL APPROVES THE 2425 BUDGET, IF THEY PROVIDE US ANY KIND OF PROJECT FUNDS FOR THESE CIP PROJECTS, IT'LL BE UPDATED.

LET ME KNOW IF YOU WANTED ME TO GO ANY FURTHER.

DO YOU WANT ME TO KEEP REVIEWING THE PAGES OR.

YEAH. OKAY, I GUESS I THINK THAT WAS WHERE THE CONFUSION WAS, IS LIKE, WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING FOR US.

AGREEMENT ON THE PRIORITIES.

THE PRIORITIES? YEAH.

SO AS THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD YEAR TO COME TO THE DIRECTOR WITH YOUR PROJECT PRIORITIES AS A BOARD.

AND SO THIS IS WHAT WE'RE PRESENTING TO YOU.

WE'RE PROVIDING THIS AS A RESOURCE.

THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT THIS HAS TO BE THE BOARD'S PRIORITIES.

AND SO WHAT WE WOULD DO WITH THAT INFORMATION, IF IT IS DIFFERENT FROM THIS, WE WOULD JUST THEN TAKE IT TO ABLC AND SAY THE PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD AND ADVISORY BOARD HAS ADVISED THAT THIS BE THE PARKS AND RECREATION PRIORITIES.

AND THEY CAN SAY, GREAT, WE ACCEPT THAT.

OR WELL, THAT'S GREAT, BUT WE'RE ONLY GOING TO FUND THESE.

WE AGAIN, THIS ENTITY DOES NOT HAVE NECESSARILY A FUNDING MECHANISM TO SUPPORT THE PROJECTS.

[00:10:05]

IT JUST HELPS STAFF UNDERSTAND THE PRIORITIES OF THE BOARD.

SO THE PRIORITY RIGHT HERE WAS DECIDED BY YOU'RE SAYING CITY STAFF, STAFF BASED ON WHAT HAS BEEN FUNDED AND WHAT HAS BEEN RECENTLY DISCUSSED, EITHER BY THE PARKS BOARD ABLC OR CITY COUNCIL..

NECESSARILY REFLECT ABLC PRIORITY.

WE HAVE NOT DISCUSSED CIP PRIORITIES WITH ABLC NOW.

AND SO AGAIN, ABLC IS A FUNDING GROUP.

WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO AND HISTORICALLY WE HAVE BROUGHT THIS TO PARKS BOARD.

WE'VE ALSO BROUGHT TO ABLC.

WE'RE TRYING TO DELINEATE THE DUTIES BETWEEN PARKS BOARD AND ABLC.

SO WHAT WE ARE SEEKING IS GUIDANCE ON PRIORITIES.

WHAT WE WILL THEN DO WITH ABLC IS WE WILL REQUEST FUNDING.

WE'RE NOT GOING TO TALK TO THEM ABOUT PROJECT PRIORITIES.

WE'RE GOING TO TAKE FUNDING REQUESTS TO THEM BASED OFF OF YOUR PRIORITIES.

AND THEY CAN EITHER ACCEPT OR DENY.

OKAY. SO THIS IS REALLY STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO YOU ALL AND THEN ABLC AND COUNCIL OKAY.

SO WE'RE ME AND HER STAFF ARE TAKING THE THINGS WE NEED KNOW WE NEED TO DO PRIORITIES LIKE ADA REC CENTER WHATEVER AND TRY AND AND THEN PUTTING THEM IN A REALLY A FIVE YEAR PLAN.

BUT LIKE SHE SAID, IF WE IF IT DOESN'T GET FUNDED THEN IT JUST GETS PUSHED BACK EITHER YEAR OR ADDED ON OR SOMETHING TO THAT.

WE'RE NOT TELLING YOU THIS IS WHAT'S GOT TO WE'RE TELLING WHAT'S GOT TO GET DONE AND WHAT OUR RECOMMENDATIONS ARE IN.

WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT'S THE WAY IT NEEDS TO BE, RIGHT.

BUT THEY'RE THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF.

I GOT A QUESTION, MEGAN.

I REMEMBER WHEN I WAS ON THE, WELL I GUESS I STILL AM ON THE HIKE AND BIKE SUBCOMMITTEE.

KIMLEY-HORN WAS DOING THE THEIR SURVEYS AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

DID THEY GET ALL THAT COMPLETED? AND JUST IN CASE THEY HAVEN'T HEARD ALL THAT INFORMATION.

SO KIMLEY-HORN WAS HIRED SPECIFICALLY FOR THE ADA TRANSITION PLAN, RIGHT? YEAH. AND THAT HAS BEEN COMPLETED.

AND THAT IS YOUR FIVE YEAR ADA PLAN.

BUT IT RELATES SPECIFICALLY TO ACCESSIBILITY IN OUR PARKS.

SO ALL OF OUR PARKS WERE ASSESSED, AND THEN THE ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER WAS ASSESSED.

AND NO, YOU'RE FINE.

WELL, I WAS GOING TO SAY IN THE NOTATION UNDER THE PROJECTION DESCRIPTION WITH JUSTIFICATION.

IT ACTUALLY SHOWS NOTATIONS FROM SURVEYS THAT WERE TAKEN.

IT ACTUALLY SHOWS INFORMATION ABOUT PRIOR DISCUSSION.

AND ALL OF THAT IS, IS RIGHT THERE.

IF THERE'S ANY, YOU KNOW, JUST WE CAN GO RIGHT THERE AND LOOK AT WHAT'S WHAT'S NOTATED.

SO THE ONLY THING THAT I WAS CURIOUS ABOUT IS IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE ONLY THING THAT'S KIND OF STANDALONE HERE WAS THE SKATE PARK THAT I SAW. IN RELATIONSHIP TO THESE OTHER PROJECTS, PRIORITY AND KIND OF THE LOCATION THAT I SAW THAT, THAT WAS PROPOSED. I JUST WONDERED HOW EFFICIENT IT WOULD BE IN TERMS OF, YOU KNOW, JUST GRADING AND DIFFERENT THINGS THAT WOULD HAVE TO HAPPEN DEPENDING ON WHAT SIDE IT'S ON.

LIKE I SAW THE ABIGAIL RICE PARKS ON THERE.

I ACTUALLY WAS SURPRISED THAT HE WASN'T IN THERE.

AS A PROPOSED PLAN.

BUT IN ORDER TO GO BACK, YOU KNOW, WHEN THAT PARK IS, IS BEING BUILT, I JUST WONDER THE DIFFICULTY IN TRYING TO GO BACK AND ADD IT, ADD IT LATER, ESSENTIALLY.

RIGHT. AND ARE YOU SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO ABIGAIL ARIAS PARK? WELL, OR IT'S ONE OF THE ONLY, YOU KNOW, THAT'S ONE OF THE PLACES THAT'S REFERENCED UNDER THAT AS A POSSIBLE LOCATION.

AND I KNOW THAT THERE'S A PRIORITY ON THAT PARK.

I THINK IT WAS WHAT NUMBER TWO WAS IT? NUMBER ONE, RIGHT NOW IS NUMBER ONE PARK PRIORITY.

SO THAT WAS JUST MY CURIOSITY IS WHEN YOU'RE DOING, YOU KNOW, PLANNING AND DESIGN, YOU'RE DOING LAND, YOU'RE DOING CONSTRUCTION.

IF THAT IS GOING TO BE A POSSIBLE SITE FOR THAT.

BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, THAT RIGHT NOW IS ONE OF THE ONLY KIND OF STAND ALONE CONCEPTS.

AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE WOULD DO AND RECOMMEND.

SO FOR AN UNDEVELOPED SITE, IF THAT IS AN AMENITY THAT THE PUBLIC WANTS TO SEE, THEN THAT'S WHEN WE HAVE THAT CONVERSATION.

AND SO IF YOU GUYS HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE THE PUBLIC SURVEY THAT WAS OUT IN JANUARY TO ABOUT FEBRUARY, WE INCLUDED QUESTIONS REGARDING A SKATE PARK.

IT DID NOT HIT THE TOP FIVE PRIORITIES, BUT IT WAS WITHIN THE TOP TEN.

AND SO AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH ABIGAIL ARIAS REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS FOR A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FIRM, WHEN WE SELECT A FIRM, WE MOVE FORWARD IN THE DESIGN PROCESS.

WE'RE GOING TO ABLE TO DETERMINE WHAT AMENITIES ARE ACTUALLY GOING TO FIT ON THAT SITE WITHIN THE BUDGET THAT WE'VE PROVIDED.

[00:15:07]

I HAVE TOLD INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE COME TO TOWN HALLS REGARDING ABIGAIL ARIAS PARK THAT THE PARK AMENITIES THAT HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE TOP FIVE, IT'S GOING TO BE VERY COSTLY TO ENSURE THAT EVEN THOSE TOP FIVE ITEMS ARE IN THE PARK.

WITH THE BUDGETED AMOUNT THAT WE HAVE, WE ARE SOLICITING CORPORATE SPONSORSHIPS OR WILL WE'RE WORKING ON THAT AS WELL.

BUT WE REALLY AT THIS POINT IN DESIGN, BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T EVEN STARTED DESIGN, WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO DETERMINE IF THE SKATE PARK WILL GO IN THERE.

BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT WE WOULD DO IS IF IT'S AN UNDEVELOPED PARK, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THOSE CONVERSATIONS AT THE VERY BEGINNING.

SO ESSENTIALLY THEN WHEN THAT BUDGET AND THAT TIME COMES FOR THE PARK, THAT'S GOING TO BE IS WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, RIGHT? OKAY.

GOTCHA. THANK YOU SO MUCH. SO IS IT EASIER FOR YOU TO GO THROUGH THEM ALL WITH US, OR, YOU KNOW, FOR US TO GIVE YOU FEEDBACK ON WHETHER WE AGREE ON ONE, TWO, THREE OR WHATEVER THE ORDER IS IF YOU ALL HAVE ALREADY REVIEWED THEM, I DON'T WANT TO TAKE UP YOUR TIME REVIEWING THEM.

SO IF YOU HAVE SPECIFIC COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS ON THE PRIORITY LISTING, I THINK THAT THAT WOULD BE THE MOST EFFICIENT WAY TO PROCEED.

SO WE HAVE TWO ONES THERE IS THAT THEY'RE JUST BUNDLED.

THEY'RE BUNDLED TOGETHER. THEY'RE TRYING TO.

SO IT REALLY DEPENDS IF SO IF YOU LOOK AT PAGE SEVEN THERE IS AN ADA ONE AND THAT'S SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO ADA.

AND THEN WE HAVE AN ARC THAT'S THE ANGLETON RECREATION CENTER ONE.

AND THEN YOU HAVE PAR.

SO THAT'S REALLY JUST WE'RE USING THAT FOR PARKS.

SO WE'VE TRIED TO DELINEATE, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE THE PARKS BOARD MAY FIND A COMPLETELY SEPARATE PROJECT PRIORITY FOR THE RECREATION CENTER ITSELF OR ADA ITSELF.

SO THANK YOU FOR POINTING THAT OUT.

THAT CLEARED IT UP RIGHT AWAY.

I'M GOOD WITH WHERE IT IS.

FROM PREVIOUS, CAN WE TALK ABOUT LINE OR NUMBER? PAGE TEN. YES.

BY FUTURE YEARS, WHAT ARE WE IN.

OBVIOUSLY SO.

SO HAVE NOT DETERMINED.

SO NOT IN THE AND SO WHAT THAT IS I DO WANT TO NOTE PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED, THE BOND HAS ALLOCATED $900,000 SPECIFICALLY FOR THE LARGER BALL FIELD, BUT THAT IS NOT ENOUGH FUNDS.

EVEN BASED ON YOUR FREEDOM PARK MASTER PLAN.

I THINK THIS WHOLE ACTIVE AREA BACK IN, GOSH, I DON'T KNOW WHAT YEAR THAT IS.

JASON, YOU MIGHT BE A LITTLE LOOK, BUT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, THAT WAS LIKE, I WANT TO SAY 2.4 OR 2.7 MILLION JUST FOR THAT ACTIVE AREA. SO ALLOCATING 900,000 IS ALL THAT WAS ALLOCATED BY ABLC.

WE DON'T KNOW WHEN FUNDS ARE GOING TO BE ALLOCATED AGAIN TO ADDRESS.

I MEAN, IT'S REALLY FAIR, I GUESS AT THIS POINT THAT OUR JOB ISN'T NECESSARILY TO LOOK AT THE NUMBERS BECAUSE WE'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE ANY INFLUENCE OVER THAT NECESSARILY AT THIS TIME. IT'S JUST GOING TO BE WHAT WE FIND TO BE THE PRIORITY PROJECT AND THAT'S IT.

CORRECT. SO FOR I WOULD SAY WE CAN DO A MOTION ON THAT.

IF THERE'S NOT. HOW DO Y'ALL FEEL ABOUT THAT? BECAUSE I'VE ALREADY LOOKED AT THIS AND..

I DID TOO I AND JUST FROM PREVIOUS MEETINGS, I AGREE WITH THE WAY IT WAS NUMBERED.

ESPECIALLY FROM THE LAST MEETING WHERE WE SPECIFICALLY TALKED ABOUT THOSE FIRST FOUR ITEMS. OKAY. I'M GOOD WITH IT.

I LIKE MY OPINION IS I WOULD HAVE LIKED TO HAVE SEEN THE SOCCER FIELDS AND THE, OBVIOUSLY THE BASEBALL FIELDS DONE AROUND THE SAME TIME, BUT.

I GET I GET THE THE PART WHERE OUR ARMS ARE TWISTED ON THAT ONE.

SO UNLESS THERE WAS SOMETHING THAT COULD BE DONE.

BUT AND SO I'LL SPEAK A LITTLE BIT TO THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION.

SO PREVIOUSLY APPROPRIATED, WE HAVE $250,000 THAT WERE WAS DESIGNATED FOR BG PECK LIGHTING.

WE DID HAVE DISCUSSIONS IN PREVIOUS ABLC MEETINGS.

THE LIGHTING IS NOT GOING TO COST US $250,000.

SO WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE ARE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE DESIGN SERVICES FROM OUR ENGINEER TO COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT PACKAGES FOR US TO GO OUT FOR BID FOR GRADING.

AND SO OUR HOPE IS THOSE FUNDS WILL ALLOW US TO AT LEAST GET SOME CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS SUBMITTED, SOME BIDS SUBMITTED SO THAT CITY COUNCIL AND ABLC IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR ACTUALLY HAS A NUMBER TO WORK WITH SO THAT THEY CAN WORK ON DEDICATING FUNDS TO ADDRESS

[00:20:09]

THAT. YOU CAN MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE PRIORITY LIST ON CIP FOR ANGLETON REC CENTER AND PARKS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DIVISION FOR FISCAL YEAR 24-25.

AND I SECOND. CAN WE HAVE A MOTION? SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT THE THE ORDER THAT THEY HAVE EVERYTHING IN.

BUT YOU JUST SAID FOR 24-25, WHICH IS ALL WE'RE TALKING ABOUT.

IS THIS COMING FISCAL YEAR.

CORRECT. OKAY.

SO ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? NO. OKAY.

I'LL CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL IN FAVOR OF ACCEPTING THE CIP PRIORITY IN THE ORDER THAT IT WAS PRESENTED TO US BY THE CITY, SAY AYE. YES.

ALL OPPOSE.

NONE. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

Apr 08, 2024 Parks & Recreation Board

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item