3. Ceremonial Presentation of the April 2024 Keep Angleton Beautiful Yard of the Month and Business of the Month.

[8. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on a request for approval of a Strategic Partnership Agreement (SPA) to be made and entered into by and between the City of Angleton, Texas, through its City Council, and Brazoria County Municipal Utility District No. 82, under the authority of Section 43.0751 of the Texas Local Government Code. ]

PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TO BE MADE AND ENTERED INTO BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS, THROUGH ITS CITY COUNCIL AND THE MISSOURI COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER 82, UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF SECTION 43.075, ONE OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE FOR THIS.

GOOD EVENING COUNCIL.

GOOD EVENING. MAYOR. THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT FOR THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT MUD 82.

I WILL SAY THAT IN OCTOBER, COUNCIL DID PERFORM THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IN CONSIDERATION OF THE SPA AGREEMENT.

AND THE SECOND MEETING IN OCTOBER, YOU CHOSE TO, OF COURSE, TABLE THE ITEM DUE TO PENDING BACK AND FORTH WITH LEGAL CITY ENGINEER, THE DEVELOPER, AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE TEAM.

SO SINCE THAT TIME, THE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN IRONED OUT AND IS IN AGREEMENT WITH ALL PARTIES IN TERMS OF THE TERMS LAID OUT WITHIN THE SPA AGREEMENT, WHICH YOU KNOW, IS A PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS ONE OF THOSE STEPS ON THAT CLOCK, FURTHER DEVELOPMENT.

BUT THIS IS THE AGREEMENT THAT WILL LAY OUT SPECIFICALLY ALL OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FUTURE ANNEXATIONS OR LIMITED ANNEXATIONS AS PART OF THAT PROPERTY ALL UTILITIES THEREOF, AS WELL AS FIRE, POLICE SERVICES AND OTHER CITY SERVICES AS PART OF THAT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS, BUT WITHIN THE DOCUMENT YOU'LL SEE SPECIFIC ITEMS SUCH AS BUILD OUT.

AND AS I STATED, TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT ON ALL OF THOSE SERVICES MENTIONED.

SO THAT'S UP FOR CONSIDERATION.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUANCE.

AND WE WOULD HOPE TO GET FEEDBACK AND THEN MAKE THE FINAL DECISION ON THE SPA AGREEMENT FOR ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT ON THOSE 911 ACRES FOR THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT.

THANK YOU. I'M GONNA GO AHEAD AND ASK THE COUNCIL TO MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING. I THOUGHT IT WAS STILL OPEN.

IT'S STILL OPEN. WE KEPT IT OPEN.

YEP. YEAH. OKAY.

ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM WHILE WE'RE IN PUBLIC HEARING? AND WE ARE CLOSING IT TONIGHT AND WE ARE TAKING ACTION.

YES, SIR. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION TO BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS.

SECOND, BY COUNCILMAN SARTEN TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE'RE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

WE ARE IN THE DISCUSSION STAGE.

COUNCIL. WHAT HAPPENS IF WE DON'T APPROVE IT? SO I THINK THAT QUESTION WAS ASKED.

I THINK THE LAST TIME WE DISCUSSED THAT.

JUDITH, THIS FOLLOWS UP WITH IT.

WE'RE VIOLATING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

IF WE DO NOT APPROVE IT, I CAN SAY THAT YOU CAN'T APPROVE IT TILL YOU HAVE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS, WHICH YOU'VE HAD.

THE MUD HAS ALSO HAD THEIR TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS.

THEY'VE ALREADY APPROVED IT AND THEY'VE ALREADY SIGNED IT.

I MEAN, I THINK THE MOST IMPORTANT THING FOR EVERYONE TO REMEMBER IS THAT BY VIRTUE OF THIS AGREEMENT, YOU WILL GET SPECIAL PURPOSE ANNEXATION, WHICH WILL ALLOW THE CITY TO COLLECT THE SALES TAX ON THE RETAIL PROPERTY BEFORE THE 30 YEARS IS UP.

SO THERE ARE OTHER COMPONENTS OF THIS AGREEMENT THAT THE THE MUD HAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING FOOTING THE BILL FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IN THE PLACE THAT CITY COUNCIL HAS BEEN WANTING IT FOR A LONG TIME.

AND ON REMIND ME HIGHWAY 44, CAIRO 44.

YEAH. IT HAD TO BE COUNTY ROAD.

YEAH, YEAH. COUNTY ROAD.

IT WAS SPECIFICALLY REQUESTED THAT I NEGOTIATE THAT POINT AND IT'S IN THERE.

[00:20:02]

SO THE MUD WILL FOOT THE BILL FOR THAT.

BECAUSE REMEMBER WE TALKED ABOUT DURING THIS PROCESS THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WAS GOING TO FLOW DOWN THERE AND THAT THERE COULD BE SIGNALIZATION IMPROVEMENTS OR SOMETHING ELSE. AND SO WE ASKED THAT BE INCLUDED SO THAT THE IMPACT OF THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE REALIZED AND IMPROVEMENTS COULD BE MADE.

SO IF I DIDN'T ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, I GUESS A COMPONENT OF THE ANSWER IS THAT THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT IS ACTUALLY SOMETHING THAT'S BENEFICIAL FOR THE CITY TO HAVE THE AGREEMENT WITH THE MUD.

IT'S A STATUTORY VEHICLE THAT WAS CREATED BY THE LEGISLATURE TO, IN FACT, BE BENEFICIAL FOR THE CITY.

I NEVER SAW EXACTLY WHERE THIS LIGHT CONTROL'S GOING WHENEVER I WAS LOOKING.

I MUST HAVE MISSED IT. YEAH.

ARE WE TALKING ABOUT RIGHT THERE IN FRONT OF ENCHANTED OAKS DRIVE? OR ARE WE TALKING BEHIND THE HIGHWAY BY THE SOCCER FIELDS AND GOING BACK THAT WAY? NO. SO I THINK ENCHANTED OAKS.

BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE SPECIFICALLY BEAR THE TROPIC COME ANGLETON.

YES IT IS. AND REMEMBER WE TALKED ABOUT WITH PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTS AND AND SIGNALIZATION AND MOVING ROADS AND YOU KNOW, CREATING THAT AND THIS IS AGAIN A MEANS TO OR A METHOD TO HELP MOVE THAT ALONG.

THAT'S SOMETHING. BECAUSE THAT'S A COUNTY ROAD RIGHT THERE.

SO WE HAVE TO WORK WITH THE COUNTY ALSO, DON'T WE? RIGHT. SO WHEN WE HAD THIS DISCUSSION BEFORE, THE COUNTY SAID IF YOU ALL WANT TO DO IT, YOU KNOW, BEAR IT AT YOUR COST.

SECTION 403.

SECTION 403. IS THERE IS THERE A PLAN FOR CAR ROAD WITH THAT? HOW IS THAT GOING TO WORK OUT? NOT PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT.

OKAY. YEAH. THAT'S WHY I WAS SO I MEAN, YES, THE COUNTY IS GOING TO HAVE TO WORK WITH IT, BUT JUST IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WE HAVE LANGUAGE ABOUT FOR EXAMPLE, THE FEEDER ROAD WHERE ALL OF THE PARTIES AGREE TO COOPERATE.

SO WE HAVE SEVERAL PROVISIONS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT BASICALLY STATE THAT EVERYONE HAS TO COME TO THE TABLE.

EVERYONE HAS TO WORK TOGETHER ON THE FEEDER ROAD.

SO, I MEAN, WE'RE TRYING TO KEEP AS MANY PEOPLE INVOLVED AS POSSIBLE, TO KEEP AS MANY PEOPLE AND AS MANY ENTITIES HAPPY ABOUT HOW THIS PROCEEDS AS POSSIBLE.

SO THERE ARE NO SPECIFIC DETAILS IN THERE YET ON THIS, BUT WE HAVE TIME TO HAMMER THE DEAL OUT.

ONE OF THE THINGS YOU'RE MAKING MAKING NOTE TO THE FRONTAGE ROAD ON TO 88, RIGHT? IS THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? SO WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE FEEDER ROAD.

YES OKAY OKAY. YOU CALLED IT A I MISTOOK IT FOR THE FAR ONE FURTHER DOWN.

WELL, WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT IS THE COMPONENT OF THE HIGHWAY THAT WILL BE RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE PROPOSED RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AND THE ENTRY FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY.

YES, THAT'S GOING TO BE WELL DOWN THE ROAD.

YES. YEAH.

BUT WE'LL BE ABLE TO COLLECT SALES TAX IF THEY OPEN ANYTHING ALONG THE 521 SIDE AS WELL, BECAUSE I THINK THAT IN THE LAST PLAN I SAW THEY HAD COMMERCIAL RETAIL ON THAT SIDE AS WELL. CORRECT.

THEY DO. IT'S STILL THERE.

BUT SOMETHING.

YEAH. THE ONLY THE ONLY POTENTIAL CHANGE TO THAT PLAN IS RIGHT NOW THEY'VE GOT THE FIRE STATION, TWO ACRES WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT, AND WE'VE GONE BACK AND SAID THAT'S A NONSTARTER. IT NEEDS TO BE OFF OF 521.

FOR WHATEVER, BUT PUT IT OUT THERE.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE HAD TO HOLD UP ON, AND I DON'T KNOW IF IT EVER GOT RESOLVED BECAUSE I SEEING 4.02, THE POLICE PROTECTION, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO HAVE POLICE BECAUSE THAT WAS A CONCERN FROM THE COUNTY SIDE AT THE TIME, WAS MAKING SURE THAT THEY HAD POLICE PRESENCE THERE, AND THEY'RE NOT RELYING ON THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO SIT

[00:25:05]

THERE AND SUBSIDIZE THAT SUBDIVISION.

DID THAT GET IRONED OUT? BECAUSE THEY HAVE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.

SO THE MUD AND THE COUNTY ENTERED AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THAT SPEAKS TO THAT.

AND ALTHOUGH I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THEM PAY FOR MORE POLICE COVERAGE, I'M SURE THE COUNTY WOULD AS WELL.

THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SETS OUT THOSE TERMS. AND AS I RECALL, FOR EVERY 1500, I DON'T KNOW, I KIND OF HOPING THE CHIEF REMEMBERED.

I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THE NUMBER OF HOUSES IS THAT MERITS AN OFFICER THAT THE MUD WILL PAY FOR.

I THINK IT WAS 1500 RESIDENTS, MAYBE.

I HONESTLY DON'T REMEMBER.

OKAY. BUT THAT AGREEMENT IS HAS BEEN EXECUTED, AND IT'S BEEN EXECUTED FOR A WHILE.

AND THEIR INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, I SUSPECT, WILL BE AMENDED.

I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS AND THE MISSOURI COUNTY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER 82.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS FOR APPROVAL.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? AYE. ITEM NUMBER NINE.

[9. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action approve Ordinance No. 20240423-009 the Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) and Levy Assessment for the Riverwood Ranch North Public Improvement District.]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION.

APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20240423-009.

THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND LEVY ASSESSMENT FOR THE RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.

OKAY, OTIS. THANK YOU.

MAYOR. AS MENTIONED, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL OF THE SAP AND LEVEL ASSESSMENT.

UNDER THE ATTACHED ORDINANCE FOR RIVERWOOD NORTH.

FOR THE DEVELOPMENT.

AND ANDREA IS AVAILABLE.

SHE'S GOING TO SPEAK SPECIFICALLY TO THE SAP, BUT WE CAN OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING AT YOUR PLEASURE TO DISCUSS THE COST ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT AND ALSO THE ASSESSMENT PLAN THAT WILL LAY OUT THE ENTIRE PERIOD OF THE 25 TO 30 YEARS OF THE ASSESSMENTS AND THE ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THAT.

UP FOR CONSIDERATION BY THE COUNCIL.

AND WE HAVE NOT OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING YET.

NO, SIR. OKAY.

ANDREW, DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK FIRST BEFORE WE OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? HAPPY TO, MR. MAYOR.

AS YOU ARE PROBABLY AWARE, THE PARTICULAR PIT IN BEING CONSIDERED TONIGHT WAS CREATED IN OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR.

AND IT IT WAS CREATED AT THE RECOMMENDATION OF LEGAL COUNSEL IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE SPIRITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE ACT, WHICH IS CALLED THE PIT ACT 372.

TO ENSURE THAT THE SECTIONS THREE AND FOUR COULD BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF A BONDED PIT.

AS YOU KNOW, SECTIONS ONE AND TWO ARE TERMED CASH BID.

AND SO THAT WAS THE REASON FOR CREATING THE SEPARATE PIT.

IT IS ALL LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES THAT WERE ORIGINALLY PROPOSED AS RIVERWOOD RANCH.

BUT AS YOU KNOW, THREE AND FOUR HAS BEEN CREATED AS ITS OWN SEPARATE PIT THAT HAS COST, PROJECT COST, THAT TOTAL ABOUT $5.7 MILLION AND THE ASSESSMENT IS $5.1 MILLION.

AND AS YOU PROBABLY ARE AWARE, THE PIT ACT REQUIRES THAT THE BENEFIT RECEIVED BY THE HOMEOWNERS HAS TO EXCEED THE ASSESSMENT.

THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNT.

AND SO WITH THE PROJECT COST OF 5.7 MILLION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF 5.1 MILLION, OBVIOUSLY THE COST EXCEED THAT.

SO THE BENEFIT THAT THE HOMEOWNERS ARE GETTING IS FAR GREATER THAN, THAN THE ASSESSMENT.

THAT THAT WILL BE LEVIED AGAINST THE PROPERTY, THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN THAT IS ATTACHED BEFORE YOU TONIGHT DOES COMPLY WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE 372, WHICH, AS I SAID, IS CONSIDERED THE PIT ACT.

AND IT LAYS OUT A NUMBER OF EXHIBITS, BUT ONE IN PARTICULAR THAT I WOULD ASK YOU TO FOCUS ON.

AND ANY RESIDENT THAT WOULD LIKE TO LOOK AT THE DOCUMENT, IT IS QUITE EXTENSIVE.

IS THE SERVICE PLAN WHAT THEY CALL THE FIVE YEAR SERVICE PLAN? WE ARE REQUIRED TO COME BACK.

EVERY YEAR AND PROVIDE YOU WITH AN ANNUAL UPDATE.

SO NEXT SUMMER YOU'LL SEE ME PROVIDING AN UPDATE ON THIS PARTICULAR PIT.

YOU'LL GET THE REGULAR UPDATES THAT YOU'RE USED TO GETTING ON ALL THE OTHER PITS THIS AUGUST.

[00:30:03]

AND THERE ARE TWO LOT TYPES IN THIS PARTICULAR PIT.

THERE'S A LOT TYPE ONE AND A LOT TYPE TWO.

LOT TYPE ONE HAS 80 LOTS AND LOT TYPE TWO HAS 64 LOTS FOR A TOTAL OF 144 HOMES.

THE ASSESSMENT, THE TOTAL ASSESSMENT WHEN YOU ADD IT ALL UP IS $5.1 MILLION.

BUT FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY, IF YOU'RE A LOT TYPE ONE PROPERTY, IT'S 2789 74 A YEAR.

AND IF YOU'RE A LOT TYPE TWO, IT WOULD BE $2,349.26 A YEAR.

OKAY. AND AS I SAID, YOU CAN SEE THESE AMOUNTS WITHIN THE EXHIBITS LOCATED IN THE DOCUMENT.

MR. MAYOR, COUNCIL, I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

IT DOES HAVE A TERSE ANNUAL CREDIT.

MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF 402 FOR LOT TYPE ONE AND 424 FOR LOT TYPE TWO.

THOSE WILL TAKE A FEW YEARS.

AS MAYOR, YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH HOW THE TOURS WORK.

IT TAKES A FEW YEARS ONCE THE PROPERTY IS SOLD FOR THE VALUE TO GENERATE.

IN ORDER FOR THOSE CREDITS TO BEGIN TO APPLY.

AND AS I SAID A MINUTE AGO, I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

OKAY. COUNCIL DO YOU WANT TO GO AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. SECOND.

MOTION AND A SECOND TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ALL RIGHT. WE ARE IN A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE COME TO THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME.

ONCE AGAIN ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM.

MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

COUNCIL DISCUSSION.

ANDREA, THIS IS A BONDED PIT.

CORRECT? YES, SIR.

RIVERWOOD NORTH IS A BONDED PIT.

YES, SIR. THE ORIGINAL RIVERWOOD WAS CASH.

THAT'S CORRECT. AND? THE BONDS HAVE ALREADY BEEN SOLD.

NO, SIR. NO THEY HAVEN'T.

NO, THEY HAVE NOT. IT'S NOT UNTIL THE.

WHAT IS IT. SO. SO THERE HAS TO BE SUFFICIENT.

THERE HAS TO BE SUFFICIENT VALUE IN THE GROUND BEFORE THE BONDS WILL BE ISSUED.

AND THAT IS A STIPULATION BY THIS CITY COUNCIL, WHICH IS THE VALUE IN THE GROUND HAS TO BE THREE TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE BONDS BEING ASKED TO BE ISSUED.

AND THE ESTIMATED BUILD OUT VALUE, SIR.

WHEN WHEN ALL OF THOSE 144 HOMES ARE IN IS $42 MILLION.

I SHOULD BE AN EXPERT ON PITS NOW, BUT I'M NOT.

YOU KNOW WHAT I DIDN'T SEE? DID I USE IT IN HERE? I THINK IN THE ORIGINAL PIT WE GOT, WE SAW THE LAYOUT, THE PLAN OF THE PROPERTY WITH THE NUMBER OF HOUSES AND THE PIT.

IS THAT IN HERE? IT SHOULD BE.

LET'S SEE, 98, I THINK IT'S 98.

YEAH. SCROLL, SCROLL SCROLL.

THERE WE GO. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING FOR.

YEAH. YEAH.

I WAS LOOKING TO SEE WHERE THE CUT IN FROM.

FROM THE ORIGINAL AREA TO THE NEW ONE IS.

THE BEST DOCUMENT FOR THAT MAYOR IS SO YOU CAN SEE HOW THE TWO COME TOGETHER AND THE TERM'S PLAN.

THAT'S WHAT I'M LOOKING. IS THAT THE ONE YOU'RE LOOKING AT? YEAH, THAT ONE'S A REALLY GOOD EXHIBIT.

[00:35:01]

AND WE'RE SECTION ONE IS WRITTEN RIGHT THERE.

THAT'S ALL.

DETENTION, CORRECT? YES. BLANK SQUARE. YEAH.

AND WE'VE REVIEWED THIS TO NOT HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM WE HAD LAST TIME.

THE ITEMS THAT ARE SPECIFICALLY LAID OUT.

PAGE 91.

AND FOLLOWING UP ON MEYERS QUESTION, WE GOT IT IRONED OUT.

WHAT'S GOING TO WHAT HAVE BEEN BICKERING ABOUT WHAT QUALIFIES FOR REIMBURSEMENT AND WHAT DOESN'T.

SO WE HAD RECENTLY HERE I WANT TO MAKE SURE THIS IS ALL SEALED TONIGHT.

RIGHT. SO I WELL, I UNDERSTOOD THIS AND I UNDERSTOOD THAT WE WANT TO KNOW.

YES. YES, SIR.

WE HAVE ALL THE COST ESTIMATES.

THE ENGINEER'S OPINION.

A PROBABLE COST IS LOCATED IN THIS DOCUMENT TOWARDS THE BACK.

SO YOU CAN SEE ALL OF THOSE COST.

AND THEY HAVE ALL BEEN VETTED.

WE DID GO BACK AND IN ANOTHER ITEM THAT'S ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT TO CLEAN UP RIVERWOOD RANCH, YOU'LL SEE THAT IN THAT REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT.

THERE'S SOME LANGUAGE IN THERE RELATED TO THAT ONE, TO ENSURE THAT THE DEVELOPER'S ONLY ENTITLED TO THE AMOUNT THAT THE COUNCIL AGREED TO COVER FOR THAT.

SO, YES, IT'S ALL BEEN BEEN LOOKED THROUGH AND DETERMINED TO BE ACCURATE.

I CAN'T GUARANTEE YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THAT THERE WON'T BE BICKERING BECAUSE THAT HAPPENS SOMETIMES.

YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? WHEN THEY SUBMIT COSTS AND THEY'RE DENIED, THERE'S THERE'S GOING TO BE A CHALLENGE TO IT.

BUT OR IF THEY SUBMIT SOMETHING THAT WE AS, AS THE ADMINISTRATOR DOESN'T FEEL LIKE IT QUALIFIES, THEN OBVIOUSLY WE'RE WE'RE GOING TO SAY SOMETHING. SO.

LET ME ASK YOU THIS. YES.

AND THIS IS PROBABLY WHERE I NEED STAFFS HELP AS WELL.

IF THERE'S ANYTHING OUTSTANDING.

ARE THERE ANY BILLS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN PAID THAT BECAUSE I'VE NOTICED, YOU KNOW, WE SPEND A LOT OF LEGAL FEES.

WE WE SPEND A LOT IN JUST OVERHEAD ADMINISTRATION.

ARE WE THAT WE'VE BEEN BILLING OUT.

HAVE WE BEEN PAID IN FULL FOR ALL THAT AND DOES THAT TO YOU.

DOES THAT IS THAT SOMETHING WE HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND.

IS THAT HAVE YOU EVER SEEN WHERE THE CITY DID NOT ENTER INTO THEIR AGREEMENT UNTIL THAT'S BEEN FINALIZED? SO THE WAY THAT IT TYPICALLY WORKS IS THAT YOU ENTER INTO A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE DEVELOPER, AND THEY PUT UP A DEPOSIT OF FUNDS WITH THE CITY TO COVER THE COST, THE VERY COST THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, MAYOR, UNTIL THE PYD BONDS.

AND THEN ONCE THE PYD BONDS, THOSE ARE CONSIDERED PART OF THE BOND ISSUANCE COST THAT ARE THEN HANDLED AND PAYMENTS ARE MADE BY THE TRUSTEE THAT IS PART OF THE BOND INDENTURE DOCUMENT, WHICH IS A VERY LENGTHY DOCUMENT.

AND SO ALL THOSE COSTS ARE COVERED AS A RESULT OF THAT.

DEVELOPERS ESCROW, THAT'S A REQUIRED TO BE PUT ON DEPOSIT WITH THE CITY.

AND I MET WITH SUSIE TODAY AND DIANA AND I SAW WHERE THEY DO HAVE THE DEVELOPERS ESCROW ACCOUNT SET UP IN THEIR SYSTEM.

THANK YOU JOHN.

SO WE WE HAVE AN INTERNAL PROCESS.

WE STARTED LAST YEAR AND WE WENT BACK ACTUALLY TO 2021 WHERE WE LOOKED AT INVOICES, DEVELOPMENTS, WHATEVER AND SENT OUT INVOICES.

AND SO I'LL JUST SAY I THINK WE'RE CAUGHT UP AS FAR AS LIKE LAST YEAR SENDING OUT INVOICES.

AND THEN WE'LL DO THAT AGAIN IN LIKE NOVEMBER.

WE'LL MEET, WE'LL SCRUB IT.

SO WE TAKE P3 STUFF.

WE TAKE JUDY STUFF, WE TAKE JOE MAURO, ALL THOSE INVOICES IN, AND THEN WE WRITE, WRITE OUT AN INVOICE.

AND SO IF IT'S A DEVELOPMENT, IF IT'S A, YOU KNOW, PID OR SOMETHING AND THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO SUBMIT NOW THEY'RE OUT OF FEE, WE GO BACK AND SAY, HEY, YOU NEED TO REPLENISH YOUR ACCOUNT BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT X OUTSTANDING.

SO AS OF RIGHT NOW THOUGH, EVERYTHING IS CAUGHT UP FROM LAST YEAR.

SO LET ME PHRASE THIS AS OF DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR, WE SENT OUT INVOICES FOR ALL LEGAL FEES.

TO THE DEVELOPERS.

HAVE THEY BEEN PAID? I WILL HAVE TO UPDATE YOU AT A FURTHER TIME TO SEE WHERE THOSE INVOICES ARE.

AND I THINK WE DISCUSSED ONE OF THOSE IN A PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION, BUT WE'RE WE'RE BILLING THEM.

[00:40:06]

AND THEN WE LOOK AT, OKAY, SO IF THEY HAVEN'T PAID AND THEY WANT SOMETHING, YOU KNOW, PAY YOUR BILL AND.

YEAH, RIGHT. THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING BEFORE WE GO AND ISSUE BONDS AND BUT BUT BROADER THAN THE PID, THIS PID, WE HAVE A PROCESS THAT WE ARE WORKING.

WE'VE INSTITUTED NOW THAT WILL REVIEW AND SEND OUT FOR THIS YEAR ALL THE WHATEVER.

RIGHT. IT SOUNDS LIKE THE PROCESS WORKS.

IT'S JUST MAKING SURE WE GET PAID.

WE GET PAID FOR.

AND BECAUSE WE'RE NOT CONSTITUTED TO BE THE BANK OF ANGLETON.

AND EVERYBODY NEEDS TO KNOW THAT, RIGHT? AND JUST FOR CLARIFICATION TO MR. MAYOR AND COUNCIL TONIGHT, ALL YOU'RE DOING IS LEVYING THE ASSESSMENTS, WHICH IS APPROVING THE ASSESSMENT ROLL AND THE THE ANNUAL.

WELL, THIS IS NOT ANNUAL. THIS IS THE ORIGINAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN.

GOING FORWARD THERE'LL BE ANNUAL UPDATES.

SO THAT'S ALL YOU'RE DOING TONIGHT.

ONCE THEY GET THE PROPER AMOUNT OF VALUE IN THE GROUND, THEN YOU WOULD BE ISSUING THOSE BONDS AT SOME POINT, I'M GUESSING PROBABLY FOURTH QUARTER OF 24, MAYBE FIRST QUARTER OF 25, PROBABLY SO.

AND ON. AND KIND OF IN REFERENCE TO WHAT CHRIS WAS TALKING ABOUT ON THE OTHER PITS THAT ARE CASH BIDS P3 WORKS WORKS WITH OTIS AND THE FINANCE STAFF BEFORE, SO THEY GET PAID EVERY YEAR.

THE ASSESSMENT AMOUNTS THAT ARE COLLECTED FROM THE HOMEOWNERS, THEY GET PAID FROM THOSE ASSESSMENTS, BUT BEFORE ANY FUNDS ARE RELEASED TO THEM, P3 ALWAYS HAS.

OTIS AND FINANCE VERIFIED THAT THERE ARE NO OUTSTANDING FEES DUE TO THE CITY BEFORE WE BEFORE WE HAVE THOSE FUNDS RELEASED TO THE DEVELOPER, THAT'S FINE.

YEAH, I JUST DON'T WANT TO KNOW.

I UNDERSTAND, YEAH, PUSHING THE BALL FORWARD.

SOMETIMES WE HAVE TO STOP AND MAKE SURE WE'VE CIRCLED BACK AND MADE SURE EVERYTHING'S ON THE UP AND UP.

YEP. ALL RIGHT COUNCIL, ANY QUESTIONS COMMENTS ACTIONS.

MOVE TO ADOPT ORDINANCE NUMBER 20240423-009 FOR THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN AND LEVY ASSESSMENT FOR THE RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN GUDES.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. I.

AT NUMBER TEN, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20240423-0010 ON THE AMENDED AND

[10. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action to approve Ordinance No. 20240423-0010 on the Amended & Restated Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) No. 2 Project (Riverwood Ranch) and the Financing Plan.]

RESTATED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER TWO PROJECT RIVERWOOD RANCH AND THE FINANCING PLAN.

OTIS. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

I AM INTRODUCING THIS ITEM ALSO ON BEHALF OF PHIL O'CONNOR IN HIS ABSENCE.

JUST TO UPDATE THE COUNCIL.

THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST WENT BEFORE THE TOUR'S NUMBER TWO.

RIVERWOOD RANCH IN TERMS OF CONSIDERATION.

THEY DID VOTE UNANIMOUSLY TO APPROVE.

THEY DID REVIEW AND APPROVE THE AMENDED AND RESTATED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER TWO, THE PROJECT FOR RIVERWOOD RANCH AND THE FINANCE PLAN IN WHICH WE'RE CONSIDERING IN THIS ITEM AS WELL.

STARTING OFF WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND THEN WE'LL HOLD DISCUSSION, TAKE INPUT, AND THEN ASK THAT YOU WOULD TAKE FINAL ACTION ON THE ORDINANCE THAT WOULD APPROVE THAT AMENDED AND RESTATED TAX INCREMENT REINVESTMENT ZONE NUMBER TWO, THE PROJECT RIVERWOOD RANCH.

AND ALSO THE FINAL FINANCE PLAN.

ANDREA WILL ASSIST US WITH OUTLINING THE PROJECT COST AND THE TERMS THEREOF.

THANK YOU AGAIN, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS ITEM GOES WITH THE LAST ITEM IN THAT THIS IS WHERE THE FUNDING FOR THE TERM'S CREDIT COMES FROM IS FROM THIS TERS.

AND SO YOU TAKE PROPERTY AND YOU HAVE WHEN YOU CREATE THE TERS, YOU HAVE A BASE VALUE FOR THAT PROPERTY PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT.

AND THEN IT DEVELOPS.

AND SO THAT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE VALUE PRE DEVELOPMENT AND POST DEVELOPMENT IS CALLED THE INCREMENT.

AND SO THAT INCREMENTAL VALUE YOU HAVE AGREED AS A AS A BODY.

MAYBE NOT YOU SPECIFICALLY, BUT A PRIOR COUNCIL AGREED TO SHARE 27% OF THAT INCREMENTAL VALUE THAT'S GENERATED AS A BUY DOWN OF THE PIT ASSESSMENT.

[00:45:01]

AND SO THAT'S WHERE THAT FUNDING COMES FROM FOR THE TERS CREDIT THAT GETS APPLIED ONCE THERE'S SUFFICIENT MONEY GENERATED IN THAT TERS.

SO TONIGHT THE ORIGINAL TERS WAS CREATED IN JULY OF 2020.

TONIGHT WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS AMENDING AND RESTATING THAT ORIGINAL PLAN THAT WAS APPROVED SHORTLY AFTER YOU CREATED THE TERS.

AND SO THE AMENDMENTS THAT ARE BEING DONE ARE YOU'RE AMENDING THE BUDGET THAT'S ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PARTICULAR TERS.

THIS TERS PROVIDES FUNDING AND THE WAY OF A TERS CREDIT FOR RIVERWOOD RANCH AND RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH.

SO WE ARE ADDING TO THE BUDGET BECAUSE WE'RE ADDING RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH.

BUT WE'RE DECREASING THE BUDGET FOR RIVERWOOD RANCH BECAUSE IT DIDN'T BOND.

AND IT'S A CASH BID. SO THERE'S LESS COST ASSOCIATED WITH IT.

SO YOU'RE REDUCING THAT PORTION OF THE BUDGET.

AND THEN AS I SAID, YOU'RE ADDING THE NORTH COMPONENT TO IT.

AND THE MAPS THAT ARE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SHOW YOU WHERE RIVERWOOD RANCH IS LOCATED IN COMPARISON TO RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH.

AS A RESULT OF THE TWO DEVELOPMENTS, IT WILL GENERATE A LITTLE OVER 15 MILLION IN ADDITIONAL REVENUES FOR THE CITY.

AND YOU AGREED TO SHARE 27%.

SO THAT MEANS THAT A LITTLE OVER $4 MILLION IS WHAT'S GOING TO BE SHARED OVER THE LIFE OF THE TERS, WHICH IS 30 YEARS WITH THOSE PARTICULAR HOMEOWNERS TO BUY DOWN, AS YOU HEARD EARLIER, 402 AND FOR 24 AND NORTH OF THEIR ANNUAL ASSESSMENT.

AND AS I EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD, THAT'S A MAXIMUM AMOUNT.

SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE FOR THE PUBLIC THAT'S LISTENING, THAT THEY DON'T JUST AUTOMATICALLY THINK THEY'RE GOING TO GET $402 IF THEY'RE A LOT TYPE ONE AND 424 EVERY YEAR, IF THEY'RE A LOT TYPE TWO, BECAUSE THAT'S A MAXIMUM AMOUNT.

SO IF THEY ONLY PAY IN 200, THAT'S THE MAXIMUM THEY'RE GOING TO GET IN A CREDIT.

THEY CAN'T GET MORE IN A CREDIT THAN WHAT THEY PAID IN, IN TAXES.

SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT'S CLEAR AND UNDERSTOOD.

AND THAT WOULD LEAVE THE CITY ADDING TO YOUR GENERAL FUND AND DEBT SERVICE, BECAUSE YOU SPLIT IT BETWEEN THE TWO BASED ON YOUR TAX RATES $11.2 MILLION OVER THE LIFE OF THE, OF THE ZONE.

AND SO BUT FOR THIS TERS AND BUT FOR THAT PID, IT WOULDN'T GENERATE THAT ADDITIONAL REVENUE FOR THE CITY.

THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT SOMEBODY ELSE MIGHT NOT HAVE COME IN AND DEVELOPED IT DIFFERENTLY AND GENERATED SOME REVENUE.

WE WOULD ALL BE SPECULATING AS TO WHAT THAT WOULD BRING.

AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.

THANKS. COUNCIL DO I HAVE A MOTION TO GO INTO THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN DANIELS.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS ENTERING THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE, AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

DON'T BE SHY.

CALL FOR IT AGAIN.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND CLOSED PUBLIC HEARING.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING NOW.

WE'RE ON DISCUSSION. CAN WE LET THE RECORD REFLECT THAT RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH IS ACTUALLY EAST OF ORIGINAL RIVERWOOD RANCH? YEAH, I DON'T KNOW HOW IT ENDED UP BEING NORTH.

YEAH, I'M NOT SURE.

MAYBE BECAUSE IT'S JUST MAIER.

I DON'T REMEMBER WHO SAID IT WAS NORTH, BUT YEAH, IT'S VERY CLEARLY NOT NORTH.

I DON'T KNOW. IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO DRIVE ME CRAZY FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE.

HEARING THAT RIVERWOOD, I THINK IT WAS OUR BOND COUNSEL.

WAS IT? YEAH. I THINK OUR BOND COUNSEL JUST CAME UP WITH A NAME.

THEY HAD THE MAPS. SHE LOOKED AT A MAP.

SO. BUT IF YOU WOULD LIKE, I CAN CALL IT EAST IF YOU WANT ME TO.

DO YOU WANT CHANGE? I'LL START ALL OVER.

NO, PLEASE.

NO, NO, NO, I'M JUST SAYING I CAN.

I JUST SAY IT? I CAN CALL IT.

IT CAN STILL BE NORTH.

LEGALLY. I CAN JUST CALL IT EAST.

IT ALWAYS THREW ME OFF. BUT I WAS JUST TOO ASHAMED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT WAS GOING ON.

I NEVER UNDERSTOOD WHEN HE REFERRED TO AS NORTH, BUT I DIDN'T.

I WAS EMBARRASSED TO SAY ANYTHING, SO.

I'M EMBARRASSED TO SAY EAST OR NORTH.

COUNCIL ANY ACTION OR ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM.

PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

I HAVE TO SAY THAT NEVER AGAIN.

[00:50:02]

A PIT AND A TERRIERS ON THE SAME.

YEAH. NEVER AGAIN.

I WILL MOVE TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20240423-010 FOR THE AMENDED AND RESTATED TERM'S NUMBER TWO THE FINANCING PLAN.

SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM NUMBER 11.

CONDUCT PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 20240423.

[11. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action to approve Resolution No. 20240423-011 2024 Hazard Mitigation Plan.]

DASH 011.

THE 2024 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS JUST A FORMALITY TO SEE ABOUT GETTING APPROVED FOR OUR 2020 2024 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

THIS IS THE FIRST YEAR THAT THE CITY OF ANGLETON HAS HAD OUR OWN HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

BEFORE WE FELL UNDER BRAZORIA COUNTY'S HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN, WE SEPARATED FROM THEM.

SO I WOULD THAT'S WHAT I GOT.

DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE BENEFITS OF WHY WE'RE DOING THIS? SURE. SO THE REASON WE'RE SEPARATING AND WE DO IT ON OUR OWN IS TO HAVE MORE CONTROL OVER OUR HAZARD MITIGATION AND THE HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT.

IT OPENS US UP TO FURTHER OPPORTUNITIES TO APPLY IN A BROADER SCOPE, BROADER SCOPE FOR HAZARD MITIGATION GRANTS AND FUNDING FROM FEMA. SO, FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE COUNTY DOESN'T, IN THEIR PLAN, HAVE SOMETHING THAT'S UNIQUE TO ANGLETON, WE CAN'T UNLESS THEY ADD IT, THEY MODIFY IT.

YOU KNOW, THEY THEY CAN SAY NO AND NOT SAYING THEY WOULD, BUT IT JUST WE'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH THEIR PROCESS WHERE IF WE OWN THE PROCESS, WE OWN WHAT'S ON THE PROCESS.

IT MAKES IT BETTER FOR US.

CORRECT. WE HAVE TO LIST MITIGATION PROJECTS AND IT'S FOUR YEARS LONG.

SO AS WE COME UP WITH MITIGATION PROJECTS, IT'S EASIER TO ADD THEM AND BRING THEM TO YOUR FOR MODIFICATION.

OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 2024 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

DID WE GO THROUGH? WE HAVE TO DO A PUBLIC HEARING.

OH. WE DO. MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND, BY COUNCILWOMAN DANIEL TO A PUBLIC HEARING AND FURTHER DISCUSSION.

CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

NOT EVERYBODY JUMPED TO THE PODIUM AT ONCE.

AS A CITY MANAGER. I'M ALL.

I'M ALL FOR IT.

OKAY. ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. MOTION AND SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

GO AHEAD AND CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

NOW, COUNCILMEMBER ROBERTS, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 2024 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

A SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR.

BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS, SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND TO APPROVE THE 2024 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU. JAMIE. THANK YOU.

NOW, ON THE REGULAR AGENDA, ITEM NUMBER 12, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MISSOURI COUNTY COURTHOUSE PARKING LOT AND ON STREET PARKING DETAILS, INCLUDING STREET SIGNAGE.

[12. Discussion and possible action on the Brazoria County Courthouse Parking Lot and onstreet parking details, including street signage. ]

HI, CHIEF. YOU WANT TO KICK US OFF? GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. YES.

OTIS ELECTED ME TO COME UP AND TALK.

SO WE HAVE.

IF YOU'VE BEEN AROUND THE COURTHOUSE WITH ALL THE CONSTRUCTION AND EVERYTHING THAT THEY MOVED AROUND, YOU KNOW, IT'S A MESS.

IF YOU WENT BY THERE TODAY, AS I DID, I FORGOT YESTERDAY WAS COUNTY HOLIDAY, NOT A CITY ONE.

SO TODAY WAS JUROR DAY.

SO IT'S EVERYWHERE.

SO THE COUNTY ENGINEERS HAVE COME UP WITH A PLAN FOR PARKING AND NO PARKING AND SIGNAGE AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, AND ALONG WITH MYSELF AND THE COUNTY ENGINEERS MET AND CAME UP.

THEY CAME UP WITH A PLAN.

AND WE ARE ALL IN AGREEMENT THAT THAT'S WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE.

SO THERE WILL BE THE COST OF SIGNS.

HOWEVER, I BELIEVE THE COUNTY IS GOING TO PUT THE SIGNS UP FOR US.

SO THE CHARTER DOES ALLOW FOR POLICE CHIEF TO AUTHORIZE THOSE SIGNS THAT YOU'RE APPROVED.

SO THEY'LL RESTRIPE ARCOLA.

WE'LL PUT NO PARKING SIGNAGE UP OR GET THAT SIGNAGE, AND THEN YOU'VE GOT SOME WAYFINDING SIGNAGE.

[00:55:08]

AND THAT'S REALLY THE CRUX OF THE AGREEMENT.

BUT SINCE WE DID THE CHURCH, WHAT WAS THAT TWO YEARS AGO WITH THE DIAGONAL? IT KIND OF MAKES SENSE.

AND I DROVE THE SAME THING THIS MORNING COMING IN AND, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE BOBBING AND WEAVING, AND IF YOU GET RID OF THE PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE. YEAH, IT'LL HELP CREATE A LANE INSTEAD OF PEOPLE WAITING AND ALL THOSE KIND OF THINGS.

AND WHILE THEY'RE STRIPING, I DID ASK THAT IF THEY COULD STRIPE ALL THE WAY DOWN TO MYRTLE IN FRONT OF THESE, THE CHURCH.

BECAUSE TODAY THERE'S THEY'RE PARKING ALONGSIDE THERE.

THERE WOULD BE NO PARKING IF WE STRIPE THAT AND MAKE THAT THE LANE THAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE, THEN THAT THAT'S GOING TO HELP WITH THE PEOPLE THAT ARE PARKING DIAGONAL IN FRONT OF THE CHURCH. AND I THINK COUNCILMAN TOWNSEND WAS BROUGHT UP AT THE POINT AT ONE TIME THAT HIS DAUGHTER WAS CONFUSED WHEN SHE GOT THERE, BECAUSE THERE'S NOWHERE TO GO.

THERE'S NO CLEAR INDICATORS OF THAT.

AND THE COUNTY DID AGREE TO THAT.

I'M JUST SAYING THAT. SO IT'LL BE ON OUR RECORD.

SO THIS WAS KAREN'S ANGLETON UNIVERSITY CAPSTONE PROJECT.

THAT'S WHY SHE WAS ALMOST DISTINGUISHED GRADUATE.

BECAUSE. SO.

SO IT SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE DOUBLE COUNTING.

SO I WILL TURN IT OVER TO THEM.

UNLESS YOU HAVE QUESTIONS FOR ME.

AND I'M HERE FOR QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE ANYTHING.

OKAY. GO.

WE HAVE THE EXHIBIT? YES. CAN YOU PULL THAT UP? YEAH. YEAH.

I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE MUCH MORE TO ADD.

I THINK HE COVERED IT VERY WELL, BUT WE'RE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

AND I ACTUALLY BROUGHT THE BRAINCHILD OF IT UP HERE SO SHE CAN GET INTO DETAILS, I GOT HER.

SO I MEAN, THE BIG QUESTION IS THE CHURCH IS OKAY WITH THIS.

YEAH. THE CHURCH. GOT AN EARFUL THAT DAY.

I'M NOT GOING BACKWARDS ON THAT.

THIS GOES ALONG WITH IT BECAUSE THEY DON'T LOSE THEIR ENDLESS PARKING.

IT ACTUALLY HELPS THEIR ANGER PARKING AND NOT HAVE PEOPLE PARK ACROSS.

AND NOT TO HAVE PEOPLE PARK IN FRONT OF THE PARKING CHURCH.

RIGHT? I GET AN EARFUL.

I HAVE A RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE THE EAST SIDE OF ARCOLA IS RESIDENTIAL.

TWO OF THEM BEING CHURCH MEMBERS.

I DO GET AN EARFUL.

SO I GUESS THE ONE THING WE HAVE TO WORK OUT IS THE TIMELINE, AND WE'LL HAVE TO PUBLICIZE IT AND DO A LITTLE SOMETHING TO KIND OF CREATE THAT ENVIRONMENT WHERE PEOPLE AREN'T PARKING AND THEN PARKING DIAGONALLY WITH THE NEW STRIPING.

WELL, I MIGHT ASK A SILLY QUESTION.

I ASKED KAREN THIS JUST A SECOND AGO, AND I DON'T KNOW WHY I NEVER THOUGHT ABOUT IT.

AND YOU MIGHT KNOW THE ANSWER.

COUNTIES, COUNTY CREWS ARE GOING TO BE COMING IN DOING STRIPING IN THE CITY ON A CITY ROAD.

WE'RE GOING TO BE INSTALLING CITY SIGNS.

DO WE NEED ANOTHER LOCAL TO FORMALIZE THIS OR IS IT JUST.

WELL, THE CITY ATTORNEY IS ALWAYS GOING TO SAY IT'S A GOOD IDEA.

HOWEVER, I THINK THE DA'S OFFICE WOULD PROBABLY SAY WE'RE STARTING IN A REALLY GOOD FASHION.

I MEAN, WE ALREADY HAVE IT NAILED OUT, BUT I DON'T THINK THIS INTERLOCAL IS A DIFFICULT ONE.

I MEAN, WE HAVE SO MANY WITH YOU GUYS.

IT'S GOING TO BE A THREE PAGE THING.

AND, YOU KNOW, MARY CAN CRANK IT OUT LITERALLY IN PROBABLY FIVE MINUTES I THINK SO.

AND OUR COUNCIL LIKELY WILL APPROVE IT ASSUMING THEY'RE HAPPY WITH WHAT THEY, THEY SEE TONIGHT.

YEAH. WOULD WE HAVE TO COME BACK TO COUNCIL TO FORMALIZE THAT.

WOULD YOU HAVE TO COME BACK.

YEAH, IT HAD TO COME TO COUNCIL.

WE PROBABLY PUT IT ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO I MEAN WHAT WHAT WE WANT FROM CITY COUNCIL IS AN APPROVAL OF WHAT YOU'RE PRESENTING.

SO WE GET THE APPROVAL, THEN WE CAN GET GUIDANCE FROM COUNCIL.

CAN WE JUST DO APPROVAL CONDITIONED ON.

YEAH. YEAH.

SO ASSUMING IT'S DONE AND ALL PARTY AND YOU AGREE BASICALLY AS OUR COUNCIL AGAIN WE'RE WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE COST OF THE SIGN THE NO PARKING SIGNS WITH THE CITY TASK. AND WE'LL DO THE STRIPING AND THEY'LL DO THE WAYFINDING SIGNS OR WHATEVER, YOU KNOW.

I JUST HAVE ONE CONCERN.

WE PUT ALL THIS STRIPING IN.

THAT ROAD'S ALREADY IN SUCH BAD SHAPE.

I MEAN, I CAN'T TELL YOU WHEN WE'RE GOING TO GET TO IT, BUT WE'VE GOT TO.

WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING PRETTY SOON ABOUT THAT ROAD.

IT'S DETERIORATING.

WHAT HAPPENS IN, LET'S SAY, FIVE YEARS, WE GO BACK AND REPAVE THAT ROAD.

WHO'S GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR STRIPING IT THEN? WELL, IS THAT SOMETHING WE CAN WORK TOGETHER ON? SOMETHING LIKE ONCE AGAIN, CITY STREET.

Y'ALL JUST ASK US THROUGH INTER-LOCAL TO DO WHAT WE GO DO IT.

SO MY SURGERY WOULD BE MAINTENANCE.

IT WOULD. BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE THINK THAT NOW.

BECAUSE EVEN IF YOU DON'T, MY BEST GUESS IS WORKING.

THERE IS IN A 2 OR 3 YEARS, YOU'LL BE LOOKING TO RESTRIPE IT ANYWAY.

[01:00:05]

JUST EVEN IF YOU DON'T PAVE OVER, IT'S JUST THAT MUCH WEAR AND TEAR.

BUT THIS TIME YOU'RE PAYING FOR THE STRIPING, RIGHT? THE NEXT TIME IT'D BE US, RIGHT? YEAH. I MEAN, IN THAT SITUATION, EVEN IF IT'S OUR CREWS DOING, YOU'LL BE PAYING FOR THE PAINT, RIGHT? YOU KNOW, BUT YOU'RE RIGHT.

SO THE NORTHBOUND ARCOLA WILL BE ROUGH, ESPECIALLY IN FRONT OF THE CHURCH.

IT'LL BE A ROUGH RIDE. IT'S REALLY BAD.

IT'S. I THINK IT'S NEEDED BECAUSE IT'S BECAUSE THEY ARE PARKING THERE.

IT'S HARD TO. PEOPLE WON'T GO OVER.

AND IS THERE CURRENTLY? ARE YOU STRIPING ON LOCUST STREET TOO? ARE YOU TAKING THAT OUT? WE JUST PUT SIGNS UP IN FRONT OF THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING FOR NO PARKING ON THE BACK SIDE.

HOW WOULD YOU WANT THE CENTER STRIPE? YEAH, WE DEFINITELY WANT THE SUNSHINE.

YEAH, WE CAN ADD THE CENTER STRIPE.

OKAY, NOW.

I WANT TO SAY ONE QUICK THING.

KIND OF ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE TALKED ABOUT WHEN I WAS HERE, I DON'T KNOW, A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT STREETS AND INITIALLY ADDRESSED THE STRIPING AS FAR AS LOCUS.

IT'S ONE OF THOSE ROADS THAT WE'VE DONE A LOT OF DAMAGE TO.

SO TOWARDS ABOUT A YEAR FROM NOW, WE'LL PROBABLY BE LOOKING AT DOING SOME MAINTENANCE TO THAT ROAD.

RIGHT. SO I'D ALMOST HATE TO ALMOST GO STRIPE RIGHT NOW.

AND IT JUST LIKE THEN YOU REALLY ARE TALKING ABOUT JUST A YEAR AND WE'RE REDOING THAT STRIPING.

IF IT'S JUST A CENTER STRIPE, LET'S MAYBE HOPE IF EVERYBODY'S OKAY, LET'S HOLD STEADY ON THAT.

AND THEN WHEN THE COUNTY COMES BACK AND ACTUALLY AT A MINIMUM OVERLAYS THAT RIGHT MILL AND OVERLAY WHATEVER WE END UP DOING.

THEN WE'LL PUT A STRIPE DOWN THAT ROAD.

AND THAT'LL BE PART OF OUR COST BECAUSE WE'RE REDOING THAT ROAD.

REAL QUICK QUESTION ON.

SO WE HAD THE DIAGONAL PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOCUS ACROSS FROM THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING IS HOW ABOUT THE NORTH SIDE OF THAT? I KNOW A LOT OF PARALLEL PARKING GOING ON THERE.

NOW THAT WOULD BE IT'S GOING UP WITH NO PARKING SIGNS THERE.

OKAY, THAT'S IN THIS PLAN.

BUT IF HE'S ASKING IF YOU ADD THAT CENTER STRIPE TO MAKE IT MORE NOTICEABLE THAT YOU'RE IN PAIN WHEN YOU PARK THERE, RIGHT? BECAUSE THEY ARE IN A LINE, IT'S THE SAME AS THE PARK.

OKAY. BECAUSE I SEE A LOT OF CARS PARK THERE.

YEAH. AND YOU CAN'T GET THROUGH WHEN THERE'S CARS ON BOTH SIDES, JUST LIKE YOU CAN'T PARK, BUT YOU STILL WILL ALLOW THE DIAGONAL PARKING.

YES, BUT YOU JUST TAKE AWAY THE PARALLEL PARKING SIDE, CORRECT? YES. YOUR DETAIL WE SEE, WE SEE HERE HAS DIAGONAL PARKING ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF LOCUST STREET.

DID YOU CONSIDER ANYTHING ALONG SHENANGO? IS THERE JUST NOT ENOUGH PAVEMENT THERE? NOT CONSIDERED THAT IT'S.

AND PEOPLE LIKE TO PARALLEL PARK ON BOTH SIDES OF IT, RIGHT? WELL, AT LEAST ONE SIDE OF IT, YEAH.

NO, HISTORICALLY, THEY'VE PARALLEL PARKED ON EACH SIDE.

IF YOU COULD DO ANGLED ON ONE SIDE OF THAT.

AND I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S. SO I THINK PEOPLE ARE PARKING THERE NOW, AREN'T THEY? YEAH, THEY'RE PARALLEL PARKING ON BOTH SIDES.

AND THE THING OF MAGNOLIA IN FRONT OF IT, ON THE SIDE OF THE CHURCH, BETWEEN THE CHURCH AND THE PARKING LOT.

THEY'RE ON BOTH SIDES OF IT. I WASN'T.

I GUESS I WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THOSE AREAS BECAUSE IT'S NOT RESIDENTIAL AND THE THROUGH TRAFFIC IN ARCOLA.

SO I THINK YOU HAVE MORE ISSUES WITH OUR COALITION ON BOTH SIDES BECAUSE OF THE TRAFFIC.

YEAH, AND I'M JUST LOOKING FOR PLACES TO SHOEHORN IN SOME PARKING SPACES.

WE ARE OPENING. WE ARE OPENING THE THE LOT BY EOC SHOULD BE OPEN IN THE NEXT MONTH OR SO TOO, WHICH IS ANOTHER 34 SPOTS.

I MEAN, I KNOW IT'S A HIGH, BUT.

AND ONE OF THE THINGS WE ALSO DISCUSSED AT THE MEETING WAS EMPLOYEE PARKING, COUNTY EMPLOYEE PARKING.

AND THEY'RE GOING TO GET WITH THE COUNTY JUDGE AND COMMUNICATE THAT OUT.

AND THEN THE CITY AT SOME POINT WILL GO IN AND START ENFORCEMENT.

FOR ONCE WE GET THESE SIGNS OUT.

NO PARKING.

PARKING BACK. IF YOU SEE IT, I THINK IT'S IN YOUR PACKET WHERE THEY TAKE THE PICTURES AND PARK IN FRONT OF FIRE HYDRANTS.

PARK PARKING WHEREVER ON TOP OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN 30FT OF AN INTERSECTION BLOCK AND STOP SIGNS.

IT'S JUST RAMPANT RIGHT NOW.

SO ONCE YOU GET THE SIGNS UP, THEY'LL COMMUNICATE WITH THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES.

AND THEN WE WILL DO ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE THAT WAS JUST PART OF MY OH, AS PART OF THE CAPTION.

SO SHARE THIS ONE.

THERE'S THE EXISTING PICTURES.

DON'T WANT TO SHOW THAT OFF. HEY CECIL ADDRESSING THE THE ANGLE PARKING THERE ON SHENANGO THOUGH, ONE THING TO KEEP IN MIND, IF

[01:05:02]

WE'VE GOT PARALLEL PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT ROAD, NOT ALWAYS WHAT WE FOUND.

WITH EVEN THE ANGLED PARKING ON ARCOLA, WE DIDN'T REALLY GAIN SPOTS BY, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WHEN YOU PUT THE ANGLED PARKING IN, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO RESTRICT THE PARALLEL PARKING ON THE OTHER SIDE IF YOU EVEN HAVE ENOUGH ROOM, BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO HAVE TWO LANES OF TRAFFIC WITH ANGLED PARKING.

SO WHAT WE ENDED UP FINDING OUT REALLY ON ARCOLA, WE'RE NOT ADDING MORE SPOTS THAN ARE CURRENTLY LEGALLY PARALLEL PARKING ON BOTH SIDES OF ARCOLA.

WHAT WE'RE DOING IS CREATING THE SAME AMOUNT OF SPOTS WITH THE ANGLED PARKING, BUT BEING BETTER NEIGHBORS TO THE RESIDENTIAL.

THAT ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF ARCOLA IS REALLY THE GOAL.

WE'RE NOT REALLY.

IN ALL HONESTY, THE ANGLE PARK IS NOT ADDING SPOTS.

IT'S JUST IT'S JUST YOU'RE NOT HURTING AS MANY CATS ANY LONGER.

YOU'RE PUTTING EVERYBODY IN A PROGRAM IF THEY NEED TO BE IN.

YEAH. SO WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT SHENANGO, WE CAN LOOK AT DOING ANGLED PARKING ON SHENANGO.

BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO.

IF YOU DID ANGLED PARKING ON ONE SIDE, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO RESTRICT THE PARALLEL PARKING ON THE OTHER SIDE.

I DIDN'T I DIDN'T NEVER KNOW WHAT I DON'T GO OVER THERE.

YEAH, I DIDN'T KNOW IF PEOPLE PARKED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SHENANGO OR NOT.

I'M NOT SURE THEY PARK WHEREVER THEY CAN.

OKAY. YEAH, I THINK THE MAYOR IS RIGHT.

THEY PARK WHEREVER THEY CAN AND MAYBE SPOTS WHERE THEY CAN.

OKAY. AS LONG AS THEY KNOW WHAT TO DO.

THAT'S. YEAH.

AND THE COUNTY IS AWARE OF THIS ISSUE.

YOU KNOW, THE JUDGE HAS BEEN HIM AND I HAVE TALKED QUITE A BIT ABOUT IT.

WE'RE GOING TO BE ADDING KAREN REFERENCED THE EEOC PARKING LOT.

WHEN THE COURTHOUSE GETS CLOSE TO THE END, THERE'S GOING TO BE PARKING ON SHENANGO THAT WE CLOSED OFF, WHICH IS GOING TO ALLEVIATE SOME OF THE ASSIGNED PARKING THAT IS CURRENTLY IN THE THE ADMIN PARKING LOT.

AND THOSE CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS GO AWAY, AND THAT ADDS PARKING TO AT THAT POINT, WE'RE REALLY GOING TO HAVE TO LOOK AND SEE WHERE WE'RE AT, RIGHT? BECAUSE EACH EACH PHASE KIND OF ADDS A FEW MORE AND EVERY BIT HELPS.

WHAT WE'RE FINDING A LOT OF TIMES IS PEOPLE ARE PARKING ON, TAKING THE STREET, PARKING, EVEN THOUGH THE COUNTY HAS PARKING SPACE AVAILABLE, THEY'RE JUST TAKING THE STREET PARKING FIRST. SO THAT'S THE POINT OF THE WAYFINDING SIGNS, IS TO HELP PEOPLE DIRECT PEOPLE.

LIKE OBVIOUSLY THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES ARE ONE THING, BUT IT'S THE JURY PEOPLE, THE PEOPLE THAT ARE DOWN HERE, YOU KNOW, ONCE IN EVERY FIVE YEARS THEY MIGHT NOT KNOW THOSE OTHER PARKING SPOTS ARE AVAILABLE.

SO WE THINK THE WAYFINDING SIGNS MIGHT HELP ALLEVIATE THAT A LITTLE BIT ON JURY DAYS.

ON HEAVY JURY DAYS, I MEAN.

I DON'T KNOW IF WE'RE GOING TO FIX THAT.

RIGHT. THAT'S JUST WHAT IT IS.

BUT IF WE CAN FIX THE 90% OF IT, I THINK WE'VE DONE WE'VE DONE PRETTY GOOD.

QUESTION I MIGHT ASK YOU, CHIEF.

THERE'S ONE BUSINESS ALONG ARCOLA STREET AND LOCUST IN ARCOLA.

DID ANYBODY TOUCH BASE WITH THEM? THE NUTRITION PLACE? NO, NO, IT WAS, IT WAS, IT WAS THE OLD BAKER AND LAWSON OFFICE AND BECAME A MORTGAGE COMPANY OR SOMETHING THERE. TO BE HONEST.

BECAUSE. I'M SORRY. NO, YOU'RE ON, YOU'RE ON.

GO AHEAD. NO.

SO ALONG THESE LOCAL, THE RESIDENTIAL STREETS, INSTEAD OF PUTTING NO PARKING, WE'RE PUTTING NO COURTHOUSE PARKING.

SO IT STILL ALLOWS PEOPLE TO PARK THERE AND VISIT THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE THERE.

AND THAT BUSINESS, THE PEOPLE THAT LIVE, THE PEOPLE THAT HAD A BUSINESS AT 303 EAST LOCUST FOR THE PAST 50 YEARS HAVE PARALLEL PARK IN ARCOLA STREET.

SO WE WOULD BE COURTEOUS TO GO TO THEM AND SAY, WE'RE TAKING IT AWAY FROM YOU BY HAVING NO PARKING ALONG THE STREET ON THE EAST SIDE.

NOT EXACTLY. OKAY, SO FIRST, WHEN I FIRST MOVED HERE, THEY USED TO PARK ACROSS THE STREET IN FRONT OF THE CHURCH BECAUSE IT WAS ANGLED PARKING THERE AND WALK ACROSS.

THEY ALSO HAVE A PARKING LOT BEHIND THEM, AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT.

I WORKED THERE SINCE 1974.

SO I'LL BEAT YOU.

I'LL BEAT YOU. GET NEAR THE PARK ON LOCUST.

THERE'LL BE THOSE SIGNS WOULD JUST SAY NO COURTHOUSE PARKING.

NOT THE ONLY PLACE THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO PARK IS ON ARCOLA.

SO THEY DO HAVE TO BE CONTACTED UNTIL.

IF YOU'RE EVER PARKED OUT THERE, IT'S GOING TO GO AWAY.

BUT, YOU KNOW, THAT WASN'T YOUR TASK TO GO TO EVERYBODY AND ADVISE THEM THAT THEIR PARKING IS GOING TO GO AWAY.

RESIDENTIAL PEOPLE HAVE PARKING IN FRONT OF THEIR HOUSE OR PULL INTO THEIR DRIVEWAY OR WHATEVER.

YES, SIR. I WAS NOT THEN PARKING OUT THERE RIGHT NOW BECAUSE OF THE COUNTY POLICE.

I COULD BE WRONG. OR YOU WALK YOUR WAY MORE TO THAT OFFICE.

[01:10:02]

I DON'T THINK YOU'RE TAKING THAT PARKING AWAY FROM THEM AT ALL.

IT'S JUST. YEAH.

THE ONE ON ARCOLA ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ON THAT SIDE? YEAH. THE EAST SIDE OF ARCOLA IS GOING TO BE NO PARKING.

I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT Y'ALL THINK, BUT MAYBE YOU CAN PUT IN A COURTHOUSE PARKING RIGHT THERE AS WELL, SAYING THERE'S NO PARKING.

YOU JUST SAY NO COURTHOUSE, COURTHOUSE PARKING.

THEY CAN'T PARK THERE. YEAH, THEY'VE GOT PLENTY OF PARKING FOR WHAT THEY DO.

YEAH. THERE'S A PARKING LOT IN THE BACK.

BACK THERE USED TO HOLD ABOUT 4 OR 5 VEHICLES, SURVEY VEHICLES AND WHATNOT.

AND MOST PEOPLE WOULD ALWAYS PULL UP IN FRONT OF FRONT DOOR.

AND THEN THE PRIMARY THEN THE PRIMARY BUSINESS MOVED FROM THERE DOWN THE STREET.

SO MOSTLY IT WAS JUST EMPLOYEE PARKING THERE.

BUT IT IS A IT IS A THE ONLY COMMERCIAL COMMERCIAL SPOT THERE ADJACENT TO THE COURTHOUSE ON THAT SIDE.

YES. I'LL MAKE CONTACT WITH HIM.

OKAY. OKAY.

SOUNDS GOOD. THE ONLY THING I STILL AM CONCERNED ABOUT HOW FAST WE'RE GOING TO PUT THIS UP, AND THAT ROAD IS JUST DETERIORATING, AND WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE TO GO LOOK AT OVERLAYING IT IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS.

SO I DON'T KNOW IF WE CAN HANDLE MUCH MORE AFTER THAT ALL THE WAY DOWN.

WATCH IT, RESHAPE IT REAL QUICK.

THAT'S THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TO DO.

WE'RE IN IT WITH YOU. I'M STILL INTERESTED ON FIGURING OUT A WAY TO PARTNER ON LOCUSTS SOMEHOW.

I KNOW THERE'S A NUMBER OF MEMBERS OF MY COURT THAT WOULD BE INTERESTED IN STILL IN DOING THAT IF IF WE CAN GET EVERYBODY COMFORTABLE WITH THE DRAINAGE AND FIGURE THAT OUT. I THINK ALL OF US ARE.

INTERESTING. I'VE GOT A PLAN.

HE'S GOT PARTNERS.

AND FIXES DRAINAGE.

AND. BUT YOU GOT TO START SOMEWHERE.

IS THE STORM DRAINAGE DONE ON ARCOLA ON THE NEW SECTION THAT WE JUST.

THAT WAS JUST DONE.

I'D HAVE TO RELY ON WE WE PAY.

WE CONTRIBUTE FINANCIALLY TO THAT SECTION OF ARCOLA.

BUT I ACTUALLY DON'T KNOW WHAT WAS DESIGNED AS FAR AS DRAINAGE.

WE DID PUT A STORM SEWER, NO STORM SEWER MAIMONA WE DID PUT A LITTLE BIT OF A STORM SEWER ON THE BACKSIDE OF THOSE, ON THE BACKSIDE OF THE TEN FOOT SIDEWALK RIGHT THERE.

SO THAT IS IN.

BUT YOU'RE SO LIMITED ON EVERYWHERE YOU GO.

THE NEXT PIPE GOING BACK TOWARDS 35, THE WAY THE DRAINAGE WANTS TO GO IS A PROBABLY A 12 INCH STAINLESS STEEL OR 12 INCH METAL PIPE THAT GOES UNDER, NOT UNDER THE ROAD, BUT RIGHT UNDER THE DRIVING SURFACE.

SO IT JUST SLOWLY METERS OUT, WE COLLECTED WHAT WE COULD AND BROUGHT IT BACK.

SO WE DO HAVE SOME SOME DRAINAGE OUT THERE, BUT THE EVERYTHING FROM THERE BACK TOWARDS 35 IS JUST THERE'S IT'S THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED, THE WAY IT WAS LAID OUT WITH THE WIDE STREETS, WITH THE HIGH CROWNS TO LET THE WATER SIT IN THE SIDE STREETS AND SLOWLY METER ITSELF OUT AND WORK ITS WAY DOWN.

YEAH. WATER DOESN'T GO UNDERGROUND UNTIL MAGNOLIA STREET, RIGHT? THE REST OF THE TIME IT'S ABOVE GROUND.

LET ME ASK YOU THIS, JOHN, BEFORE YOU STEP AWAY.

LOCUST SPECIFICALLY.

LOCUST. LAST TIME MATT WAS HERE, WE TALKED ABOUT IT.

DOES THE DRAINAGE GO WEST? FROM SHENANGO BACK TO THE TO 288 B? THERE'S A SMALL PORTION OF IT THAT DOES, BUT IT'S LESS THAN A HALF A BLOCK.

IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE DRAINAGE AREA MAP.

AND IN ONE OF MY ITEMS YOU CAN SEE THE AS BUILT PLANS.

I CAN PULL THEM OUT AND PROVIDE THEM TO YOU TO SHOW YOU WHAT'S WHAT IT'S SIZED TO HANDLE.

IT'S WONDERING HOW FAR WE COULD GO WITH, YOU KNOW, RENOVATING LOCUSTS FROM LUKE 274 EAST.

AND FIGURING OUT A WAY TO DO IT THAT WAY.

IT JUST THE ROAD NEEDS TO BE FIXED.

IT'S GOING TO HAVE IT'S HANDLING THOUSANDS OF CARS WEEKLY.

SO IT'S PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST USED ROADS, BELIEVE IT OR NOT.

BESIDES HENDERSON AND SOME OF THE OTHER ONES THAT WE OWN.

OKAY. THANK YOU. COUNCIL.

ANY FINAL COMMENTS OR CLOSING ARGUMENTS?

[01:15:03]

I WOULD JUST LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH YOU ON IT AND WHOEVER MAKES THE MOTION, LET'S MAKE SURE WE PUT IN THE MOTION TO PENDING THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT APPROVAL.

THAT WAY IT'S DONE.

THEN I'LL COME BACK. MR. MAYOR, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE WICHITA COUNTY COURTHOUSE PARKING LOT AND ON STREET PARKING, WHICH INCLUDES STREET SIGNAGE PLAN AS PROPOSED TO US. AND THIS IS ALL CONDITIONED ON THE AGREEMENT IN A LOCAL AND ONCE AGREED UPON, GOES INTO PLACE.

NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDED. OKAY.

SECOND MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN GARNER FOR APPROVAL.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU ALL FOR COMING TONIGHT.

THANK YOU. LOOK FORWARD TO GETTING THIS RESOLVED.

I'M SENDING HER AN EMAIL NOW.

OKAY. THANKS. THANK YOU ALL.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

ITEM NUMBER 13 DISCUSSION, UPDATE AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE CITY OF ANGLETON SIGNAGE REGULATIONS SECTION 21.5 DASH 20 SIGNAGE, MAINTENANCE AND

[13. Discussion, update, and possible action on the City of Angleton signage regulations, Section 21.5-20- Signage Maintenance and Removal, regarding the repair or removal of business signs]

REMOVAL REGARDING THE REPAIR OR REMOVAL OF BUSINESS SIGNS.

HI, KYLE. EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

WE WERE TASKED WITH DEVELOPMENT SERVICES TO TO ASSESS SIGNAGE AT BUSINESSES.

YOU KNOW, MAINLY. TWO 8835 A FEW OFF OF IT.

OLD SIGNAGE.

THERE WAS A LIST IN YOUR AGENDA ALONG WITH THE SIGN MAINTENANCE AND REMOVAL ORDINANCE.

SO WE COME UP WITH A LIST.

WE'VE ADDED TO THAT LIST IN THE LAST WEEK.

SOME WE MISSED.

WE LISTED A BRIEF.

A LOT OF THEM WERE STORM DAMAGE.

YOU KNOW, YOU'VE SEEN, OF COURSE, MCDONALD'S.

WE'VE REACHED OUT TO SOME OF THOSE JUST TO SEE.

THEY'RE SAYING 6 TO 8 WEEKS FOR THE NEW SIGNAGE.

SO THOSE ROUGHLY A COUPLE OF MONTHS, BUT SOME THERE'S QUITE A FEW OLD SIGNS THAT ARE THE BUSINESS IS GONE.

NOT THERE HADN'T BEEN THERE IN YEARS.

OR JUST THE POLE OR, YOU KNOW, SOME WALL SIGNAGE THAT IS THERE.

AND ANYWAY SO WE'VE STARTED THAT SOME LETTERS HAVE ALREADY WENT OUT.

WE'RE THERE'LL BE QUITE A FEW LETTERS GOING OUT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS.

JUST OUR NORMAL PROCESS WITH THE CERTIFIED LETTER GOING OUT.

WE WILL GET OUR GREEN CARD BACK FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER, SIGNED, UNSIGNED.

THEN WE MOVE FORWARD WITH, YOU KNOW, ENFORCEMENT OF AND WE'RE GOING TO LOOKING AT THE ORDINANCE, IT KIND OF REFERENCES 30 DAYS.

SO I THINK WE'LL GO WITH THE 30 DAYS ON, YOU KNOW, REMOVING IT OR NOW IF THEY HAVE A, A POLE THAT IS IN GOOD SHAPE, NOT RUSTY, WHATEVER.

AT LEAST THE ADVERTISEMENT, IF THE BUSINESS HAS GONE, HAS TO COME OFF THE SIGN.

SO I'M THINKING MOST OF THEM, THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE THIS WHOLE SIGN DOWN POLE AND AND ALL OR WALL SIGNAGE.

WE DO HAVE BANNERS THAT WE'VE BEEN, YOU KNOW, HOW THEY PUT OUT THE LITTLE FLAG BANNERS, WHATEVER THEY'RE CALLED.

SO IF THOSE GET TETHERED OR TORN, WE THEY HAVE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

AND SO WE'VE STARTED THAT THIS LIST HERE ADDED SOME TO IT.

THERE'S SOME THAT ARE JUST I KNOW THEY'VE BEEN THERE FOR A WHILE THAT ARE OFF PREMISE ADVERTISING.

SO THEY'LL BE ENFORCED AS FAR AS TAKING THOSE DOWN IF THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE ADVERTISING WAY DOWN THE ROAD ON ANOTHER PROPERTY.

SO IT CAN'T CAN'T BE THERE, THINGS LIKE THAT.

SO WE'VE STARTED THIS LIST ADDED TO IT.

A LOT OF THESE ARE LOCAL PEOPLE, WHICH MAKES IT EASIER.

BUT THE LETTER WE JUST AUTOMATICALLY KIND OF DO THAT.

SO THAT JUST GETS OUR PROCESS.

THIS ORDINANCE PRETTY WELL COVERS IT AS FAR AS I SEE.

WE DO HAVE THE INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY MAINTENANCE CODE THAT WE FALL ON A LOT FOR OTHER THINGS TOO, THAT WE USE.

IT'S PRETTY SPECIFIC ON THINGS, BUT SO WE HAVE THAT ALSO TO USE TO ENFORCE.

SO I THINK THAT'S ABOUT IT.

IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR I GUESS WE COULD WITH A 30 DAY MAYBE GIVE AN UPDATE TO 60 OR WHAT,

[01:20:06]

MAYBE 90 DAYS OR 90 DAYS.

OKAY. CAN SEE WHERE WE'RE AT ON THE LIST AND WHO'S WHAT WE HAVE LEFT TO COMPLY.

DID Y'ALL MAKE FACE TO FACE EYE CONTACT WITH BUSINESS MANAGERS OR OR.

JUST DRIVE BY MAKE TAKE NOTE THIS LIST WAS JUST MAINLY A DRIVE TO THE BUSINESS.

OKAY, HAS ANYBODY GONE UP? KNOCKED ON THE DOOR AND SAID, HEY, I'M FROM THE CITY.

YES. SIGNS OUT.

THAT'S THAT'S THE WAY I KIND OF LIKE TO DO A LOT OF THE ENFORCEMENT BECAUSE A LOT OF TIME IT WORKS.

YES, SIR. AND YOU'RE DONE.

AND BUT WE HAVE DONE THAT EVEN WITH THE STORM DAMAGE.

JUST TO SEE LIKE TEXAS GULF BANK, MCDONALD'S, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE OBVIOUS ONES, WHICH ARE AND I KNOW THEY GOT TO REMAKE THE SIGNS.

SO THEY WERE I WAS JUST CURIOUS I DON'T KNOW, YOU KNOW, IS THAT GOING TO BE A WEEK A MONTH.

AND SO PROBABLY A COUPLE MONTHS YOU'LL START SEEING THOSE GO BACK UP.

BUT I LIKE TO DO THE FACE TO FACE TO START WITH.

IT'S JUST A LOT EASIER.

AND SOMETIMES IT'S DONE.

AND THEY DO LIKE THAT INSTEAD OF READING THEIR LETTER.

AND YOU KNOW, THE BUT YOU KNOW, WE'VE WE'VE WENT THROUGH THIS LIST ALREADY AND KIND OF LOOKED AT PROPERTY OWNERS AND THERE'S JUST A HANDFUL THAT ARE LIKE LAS VEGAS AND DIFFERENT PLACES.

SO, YOU KNOW, THOSE DEFINITELY ARE GOING TO NEED A LETTER FOR THE PROPERTY OWNER.

BUT A LOT OF THEM, THERE'S QUITE A FEW LOCAL.

SO I VOLUNTEER TO GO FACE TO FACE TO SAY WE'RE NOT SENDING ANYBODY TO VEGAS.

WHY? BUT YEAH, WE WE CAN.

I'LL SEND AN UPDATE.

I APPRECIATE Y'ALL JUMPING ON THIS.

IT'S JUST SOMETHING I THINK THAT IT'S KIND OF LET'S MAYBE COME BACK IN 90 DAYS.

I'LL HAVE A NEW CHART WITH ALL THE ONES WE'VE ADDED.

AND THIS IS GREAT.

I MEAN, WHAT JUMPED OUT TO ME WERE SOME OF THE OLD POLLS THAT HAVE JUST BEEN SITTING THERE FOR YEARS.

THEY'RE THEY'RE RUSTED OUT AND THEY'RE JUST STILL SITTING THERE.

AND YOU LOOK AT ALL THE CLUTTER DOWN TO 88 B, AND JUST MOST OF THAT SHOULD BE GONE BY NOW.

AND Y'ALL JUMPED ON IT.

AND I REALLY APPRECIATE HOW FAST YOU RESPONDED ON IT.

OUR BIGGEST IS WHAT WE CALL BANDIT SIGNS.

AND THEY'RE SO HARD TO ENFORCE.

YOU KNOW THE LITTLE ONES YOU STICK IN AND WE BUY HOMES.

WE ACTUALLY GOT OVER 110 LAST WEEK.

SO YOU DON'T THINK THERE'S THAT MANY UNTIL YOU START PICKING THEM UP AND BUT IT'S Y'ALL CALL IT PHONE NUMBER.

YES. AND ACTUALLY ONE OF THEM IS A OWNS HOUSES EVERYWHERE CITIES.

AND I THINK ACTUALLY WE HAVE ONE WITH A LOT OF THOSE A LOT OF THOSE NUMBERS ARE TIED TO ONE GUY IS CITED TO COURT. SO HOPEFULLY THAT HELPS OKAY.

SO. SAY.

CAN I ASK YOU A QUESTION? YES. IF IT'S A CLOSED BUSINESS AND THEY HAVE TO REMOVE THIS, THEY HAVE TO REMOVE THE SIGN, BUT THEY CAN LEAVE THE POLE.

CORRECT. UNLESS IT NEEDS, YOU KNOW, IS IN BAD SHAPE.

RUSTY, WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE, LIKE THE ONES IN DANGEROUS JAMS AND THOSE TWO OLD POLES THAT ARE SITTING THERE, WE TALK TO THEM FACE TO FACE.

YEAH. THEY DON'T WANT THEM.

THEY JUST KIND OF RIGHT THERE, KIND OF FORGOT ABOUT.

THEY'RE FORGOTTEN ABOUT. AND AND THERE'S A LOT OF THEM THROUGH TOWN LIKE.

YEAH. SO.

THERE'S QUITE A FEW, BUT WE CAN.

WE CAN.

IF THEY REFUSE OR SOMETHING, WE CAN CONTRACT TO TAKE THEM DOWN AND THEN PUT PUT A LIEN ON THE PROPERTY.

HOWEVER, WE DON'T HAVE FUNDS TO DO THAT.

BUT THAT'S THE THAT'S THE LAST RESORT.

WE DON'T WANT TO BE UGLY ABOUT THAT IF WE DON'T HAVE TO.

AND I UNDERSTAND THE STORM DAMAGE.

I DON'T WANT TO. YEAH, I'M NOT GOING.

I DON'T WANT TO BOTHER THOSE PEOPLE.

THEY WE JUST KIND OF WANTED TO SEE.

YOU KNOW WHAT? IT'S JUST WE'RE LOOKING AT THE OLDER ONES THAT HAVE JUST BEEN IN THE.

WELL, I MEAN, IF YOU DON'T ENFORCE YOUR STANDARDS, THEN THIS IS, YOU KNOW, YOU WILL GET WHAT YOU GET.

YES, SIR. SO, I MEAN, WE HAVE STANDARDS THAT HAVE BEEN IN PLACE.

YOU GOTTA GOTTA HOLD EVERYBODY TO THE SAME STANDARD.

YOU CAN'T LET ONE PERSON WALK AND ANOTHER PERSON BE ENFORCED.

I'M NOT SAYING THERE'S SUCH A STORMS THAT CREATE SOME SORT OF OPPORTUNITY TO, TO GIVE A CHANCE FOR PEOPLE TO GET BACK ON THEIR FEET. BUT YEAH, THERE WOULD BE A FEW, PROBABLY FROM THE STORM.

THEY JUST DON'T WANT TO REPAIR IT.

BUT YOU KNOW, WE'LL ENFORCE IT.

SO BUT I THINK WE'LL HAVE A GOOD ENFORCEMENT RATE.

[01:25:05]

I DON'T FORESEE ANY BIG PROBLEMS, JUST SOMETHING THAT'S FORGOTTEN ABOUT OVER TIME.

AND. I MEAN, IN ESPECIALLY LONG TO 88 AND TO THE LOOP.

AND, I MEAN, WE'RE TALKING JUST LAST AGENDA ITEM ABOUT PEOPLE JOINING ARE COMING IN TO ANGLETON.

WE PROBABLY GET 4 TO 500 EXTRA VEHICLES.

IT IS KIND OF A WINDOW TO THE CITY.

YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU DRIVE UP AND DOWN OUR COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS AND SEE SIGNS THAT ARE DILAPIDATED OR NOT TAKEN CARE OF, THEN, YOU KNOW, JUST KIND OF REPRESENTS WHO WE ARE TO A CERTAIN EXTENT OR WHAT WE THINK ABOUT THE VALUE OF OUR CITY.

SO IF WE HOLD A HIGHER STANDARD OR AT LEAST STAY TO THE STANDARD THAT'S SET OUT, THEN YEAH, YOU KNOW, IT'S I HAVE A QUESTION.

ABSOLUTELY. COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE.

YOU COME TO EVERY MEETING, YOU HAVE FULL RIGHT TO ASK A QUESTION.

BARBARA SIMMONS, WHAT ABOUT SIGNAGE ON RESIDENTIAL STREETS ON THEIR PERSONAL.

FENCES NARITA BALDERAS READERS CHOICE AWARD.

OKAY, DON'T SAY THERE'S A LOT OF THAT TYPE OF I KNOW WE'VE I THINK WE HAD IT ON JUDITH. IT'S BEEN A FEW YEARS, I THINK, WITH THE POLITICAL ONES, WITH ALL THE VULGAR LANGUAGE.

AND WE HAVE THAT IN THE ORDINANCE.

BUT IT'S KIND OF.

SO THE REAL PROBLEM IS, AND I'M SORRY, IT ALWAYS BE THE BEARER OF BAD NEWS.

I'M GOING TO PREFACE THAT, THAT YOUR SIGNED ORDINANCE IS REALLY OLD AND IT'S OUT OF DATE, AND IT NEEDS TO BE REVISED BY VIRTUE OF STATE LAW.

AND I MADE THE RECOMMENDATION TO REVISE THAT WHEN SCOTT ALBERT WAS STILL HERE.

AND WE JUST HAVEN'T IT HASN'T BEEN SOMETHING IT'S GOING TO BE TIME CONSUMING, A LITTLE BIT EXPENSIVE.

SO THE WHOLE SIGN ORDINANCE FROM START TO FINISH NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO COMPORT WITH LAW.

SO IT WAS ADOPTED IN 2008 OR 9, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY.

NINE DEFINITELY BEFORE DEFINITELY BEFORE THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT CASES THAT THE OZ PRO SIGN CASE IN, I BELIEVE 2018.

THAT HAS CHANGED LAW.

SO YOU'RE FINE WITH THE WAY IT IS, YOU'RE FINE WITH WHAT YOU'RE DOING, BUT YOU'RE SUBJECT TO SOMEBODY RAISING THEIR HEAD AND SAYING, WHOA YOU KNOW, SO IT'S ON YOUR LIST OF THINGS TO DO.

AND WHAT I WOULD ENCOURAGE US TO DO, STARTING RIGHT NOW, AS WE'RE HAVING ALL THESE DISCUSSIONS, IS, YOU KNOW, BY VIRTUE OF KEEPING THE MINUTES, WE'LL KEEP TRACK OF IT ALL.

AND THEN WHEN WE TACKLE THAT ORDINANCE, WE'RE GOING TO DEAL WITH IT FROM TOP TO BOTTOM.

YOU KNOW, WE ADOPTED THAT IN OH EIGHT OR OH NINE WHEN I FIRST GOT ON COUNCIL.

AND THE GOOD NEWS IS, THE NEW ORDINANCE WILL BE LESS COMPLICATED BECAUSE A LOT OF THE COMPLICATIONS IN THERE ARE NO LONGER THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT HAS SAID THEY'RE NO LONGER CONSTITUTIONAL.

SO BASICALLY ALL YOU CAN DO NOW IS LEGISLATE ON HOW MANY SIGNS THEY HAVE.

AND IF YOU HAVE TO READ A SIGN TO FIGURE OUT IF IT COMPORTS WITH YOUR ORDINANCE, THEN IT VIOLATES LAW.

SO IN THE END, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A MUCH SIMPLER ORDINANCE.

WELL, THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE.

AND YEAH I THINK 90 DAYS SUFFICIENT.

GIVE THESE PEOPLE TIME TO GET THEIR SIGNS FIXED OR REMOVED.

AND SOME OF THESE HAVE ALREADY BEEN FIXED ACTUALLY ALREADY PUT THEM SIGN BACK UP.

SO I APPRECIATE THE THE JUMPING AND THE QUICK ACTION ON IT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

AT NUMBER 14. UPDATE DISCUSSION ON THE STATUS OF THE MARCH 15TH SEVERE STORM DEBRIS.

[14. Update and discussion on the status of the March 15th severe storm debris.]

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

SO WE HAVE EXTENDED OUR WE DID NOT EXTEND OUR CONTRACT WITH CROWDER GOLF.

THEY LEFT HERE ON THURSDAY 18TH.

WE WE PICKED UP PROBABLY ABOUT 90% OF THE CITY.

THERE'S STILL DEBRIS OUT THERE.

I'M GOING THROUGH IT AND TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT STREETS NEED.

WASTE CONNECTIONS AND WORKING WITH WASTE CONNECTIONS TO ENSURE THAT THOSE ARE PICKED UP.

JUST SOME INFORMATION.

SO WE ENDED UP UTILIZING THREE TRUCKS AND ONE WHEEL LOADER, AND WE MOVED 20,615YD³ IN 14 DAYS.

THAT EQUALS SIX OLYMPIC SIZE SWIMMING POOLS AS WELL.

THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST MEN CHAINSAW TEAM CAME AND HELPED TEN RESIDENTS WITH GETTING DEBRIS TO THE CURB.

WE HAVE HAD SOME COMPLAINTS FROM CITIZENS, BUT WE ARE MANAGING THEM AS THEY COME IN.

AS QUICKLY AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.

SOME OF THOSE HAVE BEEN DAMAGED TO YARDS WHICH WERE BEEN MITIGATING.

[01:30:01]

DEBRIS LEFT IN DITCHES.

THAT'S BLOCKING DRAINAGE AND ALL THAT'S BEEN PICKED UP AND SOME CODE ENFORCEMENT CONCERNS, WHICH WE'VE BEEN WORKING REALLY CLOSELY WITH DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES WITH.

WASTE CONNECTIONS. AND I CONTINUE TO MAKE CONTACT DAILY TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE PICKING UP WHAT NEEDS TO BE PICKED UP IN A TIMELY FASHION.

WE ARE HAVING SOME COMPLICATIONS, AND THAT COMES WITH THE INCREASE IN DEBRIS AND VEGETATION FROM CITIZENS.

IT'S HAPPENS TO BE SPRINGTIME AT THE SAME TIME.

SO EVERYBODY CONTINUES TO CUT TREES AND CLEAN OUT SHOPS AND EVERYTHING.

SO THAT'S CONTINUING TO INCREASE WHAT WE ARE EXPERIENCING.

THROUGHOUT THE PICKUP I WANTED DURING HURRICANE NICHOLAS IN 2021, WE HAULED 16,000YD³ IN 17 DAYS.

SO WE HAVE EXCEEDED THE AMOUNT OF DEBRIS FROM HURRICANE NICHOLAS.

WE SPENT $144,000 PICKING UP DEBRIS SO FAR.

FROM CROWDER AND GOLF.

THE OTHER OPTION IS WHAT TO DO WITH THE BIG DEBRIS PILE.

IF YOU'VE BEEN OUT TO WELCH PARK TO SEE IT.

WE'RE PROPOSING THAT WE DO BURN THE DEBRIS PILE.

IT COMES IN.

I'M ESTIMATING A 14 DAYS OF BURN TIME.

ABOUT $20,000.

IF IT TAKES US A MONTH, IT'LL BE ABOUT $32,000.

SO. WELL, YOU HAVE A.

YOU KNOW HOW LONG IT TOOK YOU TO BURN NICHOLAS PILE, RIGHT? I HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO FIND EXACT NUMBERS ON THAT.

I HAVE ASKED AROUND AND THEY SAID ABOUT A WEEK.

YEAH. SO IS WHAT THEY SAID OUR COST INCREASE FROM BURNING FROM NICHOLAS TO HERE IS THAT WE HAVE TO HAVE COMMISSION FIREFIGHTERS AND CANNOT UTILIZE CERTIFIED FOR.

SO WE'RE UNABLE TO UTILIZE OUR VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS.

AND THAT'S THE CHEAPEST OPTION VERSUS CHIPPING OR ANY OTHER.

I DID I DID GOT IT FOR CHIPPING AND IT WAS 47,990 AND THEN ADDED $10,000 IF WE WANTED TO HAUL IT AWAY.

VERSUS UTILIZING IT THERE AT THE SITE.

ON A GOOD NOTE, WE'RE STILL UNDER BUDGET TO WHAT WE SPENT IN NICHOLAS BY A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT.

THERE WAS NO BUDGET FOR THIS, I KNOW, BUT I'M JUST SAYING FOR WHAT WE SPENT FOR NICHOLAS.

TO THE COST. RAINBOWS, SUNSHINE.

COME ON. I'M TRYING TO GIVE YOU A HAPPY THOUGHTS.

SO THAT'S KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT WITH THE DEBRIS.

COULD YOU CLARIFY IF WASTE CONNECTIONS IS GOING TO PICK UP VINCE? YES. I ACTUALLY HAVE BEEN IN SIGNIFICANT CONVERSATIONS WITH RESIDENTS OVER IN HERITAGE OAKS AND SOME OTHER CITIZENS.

THEY WILL AND ARE GOING TO PICK IT UP.

IN FACT, I DROVE MOST OF THE DAY ALL THE STREETS, AND I'M TAKING EACH AND EVERY ADDRESS DOWN, MAKING NOTE WHETHER IT'S VEGETATION OR IT'S FENCING, AND THEN MAKING SURE THOSE ADDRESSES ARE GOING TO BE PICKED UP.

I KNOW THERE WAS SOME CITIZENS THAT HAD CONTACTED WASTE CONNECTIONS AND WAS TOLD THAT THEY ARE NOT PICKING UP FENCE, BUT THAT'S INCORRECT.

THEY ARE PICKING UP FENCE.

PERFECT. THANK YOU, I APPRECIATE THAT.

YOU'RE WELCOME. ONCE AGAIN, I'M VERY DISAPPOINTED IN WASTE CONNECTIONS.

I DON'T KNOW WHY I'M SURPRISED, BUT, YOU KNOW, I WOULD HAVE FIGURED THAT THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN A LITTLE BIT MORE HELPFUL DURING THAT TIME AND NOT WAITING AROUND FOR CROWDER GULF TO DO EVERYTHING FOR THEM.

I THINK THAT PILED ON TO SOME OF OUR PROBLEMS AS WELL.

AND CONSIDERING THAT WE ONLY GOT 90% PICKED UP AND WE'RE STILL WORKING ON THIS, YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE TO DRIVE AROUND.

ACCORDING TO WASTE CONNECTIONS IN THEIR OWN POLICY, THEY KNOW WHERE THE POLLS ARE BECAUSE THEY TAKE NOTE OF THEM.

SO THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO GIVE YOU A LIST RIGHT NOW AND TELL YOU WHERE ALL THE POLLS ARE THAT THEY STILL HAVE TO PICK UP.

AND THAT'S WHAT THEY TOLD US RIGHT HERE IN COUNCIL ONE TIME.

BUT I CAN ALSO TELL YOU THAT PEOPLE ARE STILL CUTTING BRANCHES AND PUTTING THEM OUT.

I MEAN, IF YOU LOOK AT THE GREEN STUFF THAT IS POST TROPICAL.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. BUT OVERALL, I MEAN, THEY THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN AND I UNDERSTAND, BUT I FEEL LIKE IT'S MY RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE HOLDING THINGS ACCOUNTABLE.

AND THIS IS A MEANS TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR RESIDENTS ARE TAKEN CARE OF.

AND IT'S NOT AGAINST YOU.

YES, IT'S WASTE CONNECTIONS.

CONTINUALLY DISAPPOINTED IN YOU'RE DOING A GREAT JOB.

WE APPRECIATE. THANK YOU. YEAH I APPRECIATE YOU ARE.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YEAH. I MEAN.

WHEN WHEN WE APPROACHED THE FIRST TIME AROUND.

I THINK I WAS EXTREMELY NAIVE.

BECAUSE THE FIGURE THAT WAS PRESENTED TO US WAS LIKE ONE TENTH OF THE TOTAL COST.

YES. AND I KNEW THAT SOUNDED WAY TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE.

[01:35:04]

THAT JUST WAS. THAT WAS I MEAN, I'M NOT BLAMING YOU.

I JUST IT WAS JUST LIKE, OH, SURE.

GREAT. $14,000.

NO, I MEAN, AS FAR AS A BUDGET BREAKER, THAT'S NOT AS ROUGH AS 140.

NOW, THAT'S NOTHING WE CAN DO. I UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, MOTHER NATURE'S MOTHER NATURE.

YOU GOT TO DEAL WITH WHAT WE GOT TO DEAL WITH.

SO THAT WAS REALLY HARD TO HEAR.

AND I. AND IT CERTAINLY SEEMED PRESENTED.

I DON'T KNOW WHERE.

I DEFINITELY THOUGHT WASTE MANAGEMENT WOULD TAKE ON A MUCH HIGHER ROLE, A MUCH MORE ASSERTIVE.

THIS WAS OUR TERRITORY THAT WE WERE GOING TO BE INVOLVED IN.

I DID IT.

I DON'T KNOW. I DIDN'T SEE ANY EXTRA.

I MEAN, I LIVE IN THE CITY.

I MEAN, OF COURSE, LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE ON THE COUNCIL.

SO I DIDN'T SEE TRUCKS ROLLING AROUND LOOKING FOR STUFF TO DO.

OR IF THEY WERE, THEY WERE DRIVING PAST A LOT OF OTHER STUFF BROUGHT PAST.

SO YEAH, THAT WAS EXTREMELY DISAPPOINTING.

AND YEAH.

AND I KNOW ADDITIONAL LIKE YOU SAID, SPRINGTIME.

IT'S JUST THAT TIME OF YEAR.

PEOPLE ARE, YOU KNOW.

PROBABLY A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE HAD TO TAKE A SIGNIFICANT REFLECTION OF THEIR OWN TREES AND SAY, OKAY, IS THIS A SAFETY HAZARD NOW? OR WHEN THEY DIDN'T REALIZE IT WAS, OR MAYBE THEY SUSPECTED IT WAS, BUT NOW THEY KNOW WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING.

SO I GET ALL THAT.

IT'S JUST THAT THAT I DON'T KNOW, JUST CUMULATIVELY, I DON'T ALWAYS I WENT FROM BEING PROBABLY, LIKE I SAID VERY HELPFUL. ALL THE VERY MINUTE PRICE.

WHAT? MUCH MORE THAN I EXPECTED.

PROBABLY TURNED OUT TO MUCH MORE TO REALITY.

BUT I STILL DO THINK WASTE MANAGEMENT.

MANAGEMENT. I MEAN, THEY HAVE A CONTRACT.

I THINK THEY SHOULD. TO VALUE OUR LOYALTY TO THEM AND EXPECT TO DO THEIR JOB.

SO SORRY, I'M JUST RAMBLING JUST TO THE GULF CROWDER THING.

I MEAN, SO REMEMBER WE HAD THE INCIDENT.

WE SAID WE KNEW WE KNOW WE NEED TO DO DEBRIS REMOVAL.

AND WE MADE A CONSCIOUS DECISION TO WAIT AND SAY, LET'S WAIT TWO, THREE WEEKS TILL THE FIRST DATE OR WHATEVER, BECAUSE WE HAD TO GIVE PEOPLE TIME, LIKE THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST MEN'S AND THE ALL THE OTHER FOLKS THAT CAME IN AND WERE, YOU KNOW, WERE ABLE TO HELP OUT PEOPLE OR PEOPLE LINED UP WITH THEIR OWN CONTRACTORS.

AND SO THAT WAS OUR, YOU KNOW, THAT WAS THE SHOT IN THE DARK AND THE THE THING TO GET THEM MOBILIZED SO THAT WE COULD ENGAGE.

AND I FRANKLY, I WAS A LITTLE SURPRISED TO YOU THAT IT ENDED UP BEING MORE NICHOLAS.

I MEAN, I GUESS BECAUSE IT'S A HURRICANE VERSUS A STRONG WIND THING, WE ALL GET LIKE, IT'S GOT TO BE WORSE, BUT AND AND THEN I THINK WE, YOU KNOW, BETWEEN NICHOLAS, WHATEVER IT WAS TWO YEARS AGO AND THIS I THINK I KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE TALK TO ME LIKE, HEY, I REASSESSED MY YARD AND DECIDED I NEED TO BRING SOMEONE IN TO CUT DOWN MORE BRANCHES OR TREE BECAUSE I DIDN'T WANT THIS TO HAPPEN A THIRD TIME.

AND, YOU KNOW, X NUMBER OF YEARS.

SO I DO, I DO WONDER, I MEAN GULF CROWDER'S BID.

SEEMED AGAIN SEEMED LOW.

AND SO THAT FALLS ON ME.

IT WAS A LEARNING LESSON.

FOR MYSELF AND THE CROWDER AND GOLF.

WE CAME IN. WE SHOULD HAVE WAITED A WEEK.

INSTEAD OF COMING IN SO QUICKLY AFTER THE STORM, WE WEREN'T THINKING ABOUT.

THEY HAVE NOT HAD POWER FOR THREE DAYS, AND THEN IT RAINED.

AND THEN IT RAINED THE WEEKEND, SO THEY DID NOT HAVE TIME TO PULL IT OUT.

SO WHAT WE INITIALLY ASSESSED AND WHAT WE SAW WAS WHAT WE WHAT THAT STATEMENT WAS OFF OF.

SO HINDSIGHT IS ALWAYS 2020 TO KNOW.

LET'S LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE.

LET'S LOOK AT THE WEATHER. HAVE THEY HAD OPPORTUNITIES TO PULL OUT THAT DEBRIS.

AND THEN YES, THEY'RE GOING TO COME CARRIEDON GOLF IS GOING TO COME AND WE KNOW WHAT DAY THEY'RE GOING TO COME.

BUT LET'S LOOK AND WAIT BEFORE WE ASSESS THE DEBRIS.

AND I'M NOT TRYING TO POINT FINGERS.

I WILL SAY THAT I WAS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE MY NEXT SUGGESTION WAS BEEN HINDSIGHT.

AGAIN USING WHAT WE KNOW NOW WOULD BE I, I APPRECIATE YOUR ATTEMPT TO EXPEDITIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, GET AFTER IT, SO TO SPEAK. BUT.

[01:40:02]

YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY SINCE THE DECISION WAS TO TO WAIT TWO WEEKS, IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER OFF TO GET A REAL OFFICIAL QUOTE OR TO LET SOME OF THAT RIGHT.

BUT WE KNOW THAT NOW I'M NOT AGAIN, IT'S.

YEAH. AND WHAT'S HARD ABOUT THE DEBRIS IS THEY DON'T OPERATE OFF OF THE QUOTE THEY OFFER.

THEY OPERATE OFF OF NT.

SO YOU GIVE THEM A VALUE, THEY WORK UP INTO THAT VALUE.

SO IT'S NOT LIKE OH $20,000.

WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS. THEY WORK UP TO THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT YOU SAID AND HOW MUCH WORK IS DONE.

SO OKAY. WELL ANYWAY, JUST I APPRECIATE THAT.

AND I'M NOT IT'S NOT A I'M NOT HERE, LIKE I SAID.

BUT IF WE DON'T TALK ABOUT THESE THINGS AND THEN WE DON'T GROW FROM THEM.

SO 100% I LEARNED A LOT THROUGH THIS PROCESS.

SO WASTE CONNECTIONS HAD THREE WEEKS TO START PICKING UP DEBRIS, AND WE COULD HAVE WORKED WITH THEM ON IF WE HAD TOLD RESIDENTS, HEY, YOU KNOW, THIS WEEK WE'RE GOING TO ONLY HAVE TRASH PICK UP ONCE THIS WEEK BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE FOCUSING ON DEBRIS.

I'M PRETTY SURE MOST RESIDENTS WOULD HAVE BEEN BEHIND THAT.

BUT, YOU KNOW, I LOOK AT WHAT JUST HAPPENED IN WEST COLUMBIA RECENTLY AND TALKING TO THE MAYOR OVER THERE AND MOVING QUICKLY WITH WASTE CONNECTIONS AND PICKING UP.

THEY SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOING THAT HERE AND THEY DIDN'T.

THE THIRD THING I WANT TO BRING UP IS, AND I'M PROBABLY GONNA GET STUFF THROWN AT ME, BUT WHY COULD WE NOT UTILIZE OUR OWN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT? AND IS IT BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE EQUIPMENT? AND IF IT'S BECAUSE OF THE EQUIPMENT, WE NEED TO MAKE SOME CHANGES? BECAUSE THIS IS THE SECOND OR THIRD STORM IN THE LAST FEW YEARS THAT WE'VE HAD ISSUES WITH TREE AND DEBRIS, MAYBE WE NEED TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT TO WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK WITH A PROPOSAL OF WHAT TO DO.

ALSO, THE COMPANY THAT DID COME HAULING AWAY, THEY DO MAKE A SMALLER GRAPPLE TRUCK AND TRAILER, AND I'M GOING TO WORK ON PUTTING THAT IN THE HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TO GET A GRANT FOR THAT. BECAUSE THAT WAS ONE OF THE OTHER THINGS.

I WAS LIKE, YOU KNOW, IF WE HAD HAD IT ON OURSELVES, WE WE MIGHT BE ABLE TO GET ANOTHER EXTRA DAY HERE AND THERE AND GET VOLUNTEERS AND GO THROUGH THERE AND START PICKING STUFF UP.

I MEAN, I WOULD HAVE VOLUNTEERED AND I KNOW OTHER PEOPLE WOULD HAVE TOO.

SO WHATEVER WE GOT TO DO.

YEAH, I MEAN ANYTIME.

I'M CERTAINLY OPEN TO ANY INVESTMENTS THAT COULD BE MADE TO ALLOW THE RESOURCES IN HOUSE TO BE UTILIZED.

YOU KNOW, IF POSSIBLE.

I KNOW EVERYTHING COMES WITH A PRICE TAG.

AND SO AND THAT IS WE DO NOT HAVE THE EQUIPMENT TO HANDLE.

THE LARGE TREES AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

WE EXPERIENCED THIS. YEAH.

I MEAN, I DEFINITELY LIKE FOR OPPORTUNITIES THAT, YOU KNOW IN MY MIND, AND I'M NOT SAYING SOME OF Y'ALL PROBABLY HAVEN'T ALREADY THOUGHT OF, BUT A PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THAT COULD BE USED IN THIS SITUATION, BUT COULD BE ALSO CROSSED OVER INTO OTHER SITUATIONS THAT WE COULD.

SO IT'S UTILIZED MORE THAN JUST, SAY ONCE ANNUALLY, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT.

SO ANYWAY, FOOD FOR THOUGHT.

I'M, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING I THINK WE SHOULD CONSIDER BECAUSE.

YOU KNOW, AN INITIAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT MAY BE WORTH IT IN THE LONG RUN THAN PAYING SOME CONTRACTUAL FEE OF $150,000, YOU KNOW.

SO EVERY COUPLE OF YEARS.

COUNCIL. ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION. JAMIE, THANK YOU FOR THE UPDATE AND THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU'VE BEEN DOING.

THANK YOU. APPRECIATE IT.

YES. THANK YOU. ITEM NUMBER 15 DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR JACQUELINE DODGE DEALERSHIP TO BE LOCATED ADJACENT AND NORTH OF THE GULF COAST FORD

[15. Discussion and possible action on a Conceptual Plan for Yaklin Dodge Dealership to be located adjacent and north of the Gulf Coast Ford Dealership property, which is located at 3000 SH 288 Access Road.]

DEALERSHIP PROPERTY, WHICH IS LOCATED AT 3000 SOUTH HIGHWAY 288 ACCESS ROAD.

THANK YOU. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS A CONCEPT REVIEW OF A POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE ANGLETON AREA IS ACTUALLY IN OUR ETJ, JUST NORTH OF THE FORD DEALERSHIP, WHICH IS AT THREE 3100.

OF COURSE, THE FEEDER ROAD OF SOUTH 288.

I'M SORRY, STATE HIGHWAY 288 THIS CONVERSATION HAS GONE BEFORE THE CITY FOR QUITE SOME TIME.

I THINK ABOUT TWO YEARS THEY CAME WITH THIS PROPOSAL.

YANKEELAND DEALERSHIP IS LOCATED HERE, BUT THEY'RE TRYING TO LOCATE ON THIS PARTICULAR SITE.

DISCUSSIONS WERE HAD A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO IN TERMS OF PROVIDING FOR UTILITY SERVICES TO THE SITE.

[01:45:01]

WE HAVE GRAPHICS IN WHICH YOU HAVE AVAILABLE.

THE CITY ENGINEER HAS REVIEWED AND GIVEN NUMBERS BACK TWO YEARS AGO.

WE'RE TRYING TO WORK WITH SOME CURRENT NUMBERS.

ALSO. WE WORKED WITH THEM IN TERMS OF PROVIDING US WITH THEIR CAPACITY FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PAD SITE.

THE OWNER OF THE BUSINESS IS AVAILABLE TO SPEAK TO COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSAL ITSELF.

WE'LL BE WORKING, OF COURSE, WITH LEGAL AND THE CITY ENGINEER.

IN WHAT TYPE OF FUTURE AGREEMENTS NEED TO BE ESTABLISHED AND THE PLAN FOR MAYBE FUTURE ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY FOR SALES TAX OPPORTUNITIES THERE.

AND THEN WE'LL TALK ALSO WITH THE CONNECTIONS AND WHAT THOSE LOOK LIKE IN TERMS OF OUR CAPACITY ALLOWANCE IN WHICH WE CURRENTLY HAVE. SO WE CAN LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK ABOUT THE PROPOSAL PERHAPS FIRST, AND THEN CITY ENGINEER WILL PROBABLY INPUT, IF NOT PUBLIC WORKS AS WELL.

AND THEN WE'LL TRY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS AND THEN PLAN FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

SO MIGUEL AS WELL AS THE PROPERTY OWNER WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK WITH COUNCIL.

GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME IS JUSTIN JACKLIN.

I'M THE OWNER OF THE AUCKLAND CHRYSLER JEEP OF ANGLETON.

AND LIKE HE SAID, THIS HAS BEEN A LONG TIME COMING FOR US.

WE THOUGHT WE WERE GOING TO GET HERE IN 2020 AND RAN INTO SOME EASEMENT ISSUES WITH THE LAND WE WANTED TO ACQUIRE. FINALLY GOT IT ALL TAKEN CARE OF ABOUT SIX MONTHS AGO AND REALLY GOT THE PROCESS GOING AGAIN.

WE HAVE DEVELOPED THE SITE.

OR THE PLANS TO REMAIN OUTSIDE OF THE CITY.

HOWEVER, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD LIKE TO, TO DISCUSS POSSIBLY VOLUNTEERING TO BE ANNEXED.

AND. YOU BRING THE PROPERTY INSIDE CEILINGS.

SO THEY I MEAN THEY WANT WATER.

SO TO ME IT WOULD BE IF YOU WANT WATER ANNEX IN THE CITY BECAUSE THEN WE CAN REALIZE THE VALUE OF THAT PROPERTY.

RIGHT. JOHN.

WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE CONNECTION? IMPACT? SHOULD BE SMALL.

WE'VE REQUESTED TO GET, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY'RE PROJECTING ON, ON THEIR ACTUAL NEEDS.

WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED THAT YET, BUT WE HAVE WHEN PULLED THE WATER.

WHAT THEY'RE CURRENTLY USING AT THE OLD DODGE DEALERSHIP RIGHT NOW, WE ADDED SOME FLUFF ON TO IT.

SO, YOU KNOW, WHEN THESE CAR LOTS, THE MAJORITY OF THE AREA IS PARKING, RIGHT? IT'S VERY LITTLE USAGE OF WATER IN THE ACTUAL DEALERSHIP OTHER THAN THE WASHING OF THE CARS.

SO WE'RE WE'RE ESTIMATING LIKE THREE, FOUR ISSUES, SOMETHING SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE.

YOU KNOW, THEY'LL HAVE IT PROBABLY A KITCHEN AND A BATHROOMS AND JUST THE WORKING OF THE.

THIS IS NOT SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT AREA.

RIGHT, SIR.

THIS IS IN THAT SPECIAL AREA THAT WE CREATED.

OR IS IT OUTSIDE THE BOUNDARIES OF IT? THE ONE THAT I THAT I'VE BEEN A PART OF, THAT WE CREATED AN INDUSTRIAL PARK WAS ON THE WEST.

EAST SIDE? NO.

WEST SIDE OF 288 OVER THERE WHERE THE DPS AND STUFF WERE.

SO JUDITH HAD GIVEN ME SOME INFORMATION AND I WENT AND FOUND FROM THE THEY WERE THEY CALL IT THE NORTH, THE NORTH 288 INDUSTRIAL INDUSTRIAL.

BUT WE FOUND OR ALL I'VE BEEN IS JUST LIKE PROPERTIES THAT ARE IN THERE.

AND I PROVIDED THAT BACK TO JUDITH, THOSE PROPERTIES.

SO JOHN, I DON'T KNOW HOW DID THAT PARCEL GET INTO THE CITY GULF COAST BOARD.

HOW DID THAT DO YOU KNOW? ANNEXATION. ANNEXATION AT THE TIME OF OF BEING BUILT, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY.

THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED.

THEY REQUESTED TO BE ANNEXED.

THAT WAS A MAJOR STORM WATER BEING SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE EXPANSION OUT THAT WAY, JUST SPECIFICALLY TO GET THEM GET THEM WATER.

AND THEN LATER ON, WATER WAS EXTENDED SOUTH ACROSS 523 TO TO FURNISH THE WATER TO THE GM DEALERSHIP.

[01:50:05]

AND AGAIN ON THOSE ISSUES.

WE WON'T KNOW UNTIL WE GET SOME PLANS AND WE TRY TO KIND OF.

BUT RIGHT NOW IT'S ESTIMATED JUST OFF OF THEIR CURRENT USAGE IN THREE TIMES AS MUCH, TWO TIMES AS MUCH, JUST ON THE SIZE OF THE THING I'M REFERRING TO THE IN 2017, I GUESS WHEN WE PUT TOGETHER THE THE IMPACT FEE OR THE THE THE IMPACT ZONE, THE IMPACT ZONE OF THE OF THE TWO, THAT'S ALL ON THE WEST SIDE OF TWO ON THE WEST.

SO THIS IS OUTSIDE OF THAT.

THIS IS OUTSIDE OF THE IMPACT.

THAT'S WHAT I WAS TRYING TO GET AT OKAY.

BECAUSE I THOUGHT WE LOOPED THE 12 INCH LINE UP THE EAST SIDE FROM.

WHERE? WE TOOK A WATER LINE.

WE DID TAKE THE WATER LINE EXTENDED ALONG THE FEEDER ROAD BACK OVER TO THE BACK.

OVER THERE WE TOOK A SANITARY LINE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO THE LIFT STATION THAT WE THAT WE BUILT OVER THERE BY THE RV PARK THAT HAD TO HAVE AN OUTFALL. SO WE BROUGHT THE GRAVITY ALL THE WAY BACK AS FAR AS WE COULD, RIGHT THERE BY THE KUBOTA DEALERSHIP.

THAT'S WHERE WE CAME ACROSS.

WE TOOK A 16 INCH LINE ACROSS 288, CORRECT FROM THE FEED.

AND THEN WE ALSO LOOPED IT TO GIVE IT A RESILIENCY AND REDUNDANCY BACK AROUND THE FRONT, BUT BACK OVER WHERE THIS IS THAT SIDE OKAY.

WHAT'S THE PLAN? I MEAN, JUST OVERALL, IF YOU LOOK AT THE SCOPE OF YOUR CURRENT DEALERSHIP FOOTPRINT AND WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD, ARE YOU DOUBLING? ARE YOU STAYING THE SAME SIZE? PROBABLY TRIPLE.

TRIPLE PROBABLY HAVE ENOUGH SPACE NOW FOR ABOUT 75 VEHICLES AT THE CURRENT LOCATION.

AND I THINK WE'LL PROBABLY THREE 5400 AT THE NEW FACILITY.

MORE SERVICE BAYS SIGNIFICANTLY MORE.

THE A LOT OF THE BUSINESS FROM I THINK PROBABLY BECAUSE WE'RE, WE'RE LOCATED I SEE I CAN SEE THE NUMBERS FOR BOTH FORD AND CHRYSLER.

DODGE, JEEP, RAM AND DODGE LOSES A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF ITS BUSINESS TO BERLIN.

AND YOU DON'T SEE THAT ON THE PORT SIDE, PROBABLY BECAUSE WE HAVE GULF COAST FORD OUT ON THE HIGHWAY.

YOU KNOW, WHERE WE'RE LOCATED.

MOST PEOPLE DON'T EVEN KNOW WHERE THERE.

SO. WE CAN HELP YOU MIND ME ASKING HOW LARGE A TRACT OF LAND YOUR TEAM DEVELOP UP THERE? I THINK WE'RE JUST UNDER TEN ACRES.

NINE AND A HALF. TEN? WHAT'S YOUR CONSTRUCTION PERIOD? WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT? I THINK WE'RE READY TO GO TO PERMITTING PRETTY SOON.

I WAS HOPING TO BREAK GROUND, YOU KNOW, ON SOME OF THE DIRT WORK AND, YOU KNOW, MAY, BUT I THINK THAT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE LATER THIS SUMMER.

BUT I WOULD DEFINITELY LIKE TO TO BREAK GROUND NO LATER THAN AUGUST AND BE IN THE FACILITY WITHIN 12 MONTHS.

AND YOUR PLAN IS TO SELL THE OLD LOCATION, OR.

I DIDN'T BUY THAT LOCATION.

YOU DIDN'T. OKAY, SO.

GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF PERSPECTIVE.

YOU PUT YOUR FINGERS IN YOUR EARS.

I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT YOUR COMPETITOR.

THE GULF COAST FORD SITE.

THERE IS 8.6 ACRES.

THEY'RE GOING TO BE TEN.

SO. COUPLE ACRES MORE JUST TO THE NORTH OF THEM.

I DON'T KNOW HOW FAR EAST THEY GO.

IT'S JUST LIKE, HEY, MAN, OR WHATEVER, BUT IT'S IT'S ANOTHER PIECE OF PROPERTY ABOUT A LITTLE BIT BIGGER THAN WHAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT THERE.

NORTH. WE'VE DONE SIMILAR.

YOU KNOW, IF YOU NOTICE ON THE BACK OF GULF COAST BOARD, YOU CAN SEE THEIR NEW NEW AREA THERE FOR PARKING.

I THINK WE HAVE INITIALLY I THINK WE'RE PROBABLY UTILIZING ALL BUT ABOUT AN ACRE.

THAT WE'RE, YOU KNOW, LEAVING FOR PHASE TWO.

AND THE WHOLE FACILITY HAS REALLY BEEN DESIGNED TO ALLOW FOR FUTURE EXPANSION, YOU KNOW, DOWN THE ROAD.

THE WAY ANGLETON OR I EXPECT IT TO GROW.

[01:55:02]

WE PROBABLY HAVE LEFT THE CAPABILITY TO GO FROM 18 SERVICE BAYS TO PROBABLY 32 OR SO.

WITHOUT ANY MAJOR, MAJOR DEMOLISHING OF THE BUILDING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

SO. BE CARRYING ANY ADDITIONAL BRANDS THAT YOU CURRENTLY HAVE, OR ARE YOU GOING TO KEEP THE SAME? IT'LL JUST BE A CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM FRANCHISE.

PRETTY EXCITING.

YEAH, I CAN'T WAIT.

IT'S. IT'S PASCU FOR SURE.

IT'S SAD TOO.

I MEAN, IT'S EXCITING TO SEE THIS GOING IN.

IT'S SAD TO SEE ANOTHER BUSINESS LEAVING THE SOUTH SIDE OF TOWN AND MOVING UP.

YOU KNOW, THAT'S WHY I ASKED THE QUESTION ABOUT THAT OLD BUILDING.

WHAT HAPPENS TO IT? I KNOW THERE'S BEEN A LITTLE BIT OF INTEREST.

YOU KNOW, A FEW PEOPLE THINK THAT I DO ON THAT FACILITY AND KNOW THAT, OF COURSE, NOW WE HAVE A SIGN IN FRONT OF THE FACILITY THAT WE'RE MOVING IN 2024. AND A FEW DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE APPROACHED.

HEY, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH YOUR FACILITY? WE'D BE INTERESTED, YOU KNOW, AND SO I THINK SOMETHING WILL GO ON.

IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE INDUSTRIAL.

YOU KNOW. BUT AS LONG AS LISA WILL BE OCCUPIED.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. TAKE YOUR SIGN WITH YOU.

SO IF YOU ALL IF YOU ALL ARE INTERESTED, THEN WE NEED TO ENTER INTO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE, YOU KNOW, WE BEAR NO COST IF WE WANT THEM TO VOLUNTARY ANNEX IN EXCHANGE FOR THE WATER AND SEWER.

AND THEY OBTAIN THE EASEMENT AND ALL THAT KIND OF STUFF THAT WOULD NEED TO MAKE IT HAPPEN.

OKAY. MAKE A MOTION TO DO EVERYTHING THAT CHRIS JUST SAID.

SECOND. SEE, I WORE THAT ONE.

I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND, BY COUNCILWOMAN DANIEL, TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT BASED OFF OF THE COMMENTS FROM THE CITY MANAGER OF ANNEXATION WATER.

I GUESS BEING USING WATER AND OTHER.

OTHER POINTS OF DETAIL.

THERE WE GO. ANY FURTHER? GOT THE ATTORNEY LOOKING AT ME OVER HERE, SO THAT'S FINE.

THAT'S GOOD. SHE'S HERE FOR.

WE'LL COME BACK WITH SPECIFICS IF ONCE WE FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY ARE.

OKAY. OKAY.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

LOOK FORWARD TO DOING BUSINESS WITH YOU.

THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU FOR EXPANDING.

THIS PROPERTY.

ITEM NUMBER 16.

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 20240423-016, AN AMENDED AND RESTATED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR RIVERWOOD RANCH NORTH

[16. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution No. 20240423-016 an amended and restated Reimbursement Agreement for Riverwood Ranch North Public Improvement District between the City of Angleton and Riverwood Ranch, LLC, a Texas limited liability company. ]

PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND RIVERWOOD RANCH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDED AND RESTATED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT IN WHICH YOU ACTUALLY APPROVED ON MARCH 26TH.

SINCE THAT TIME, OUR BOND COUNSEL DID CONTACT US AND NOTIFIED US THAT SOME ADDITIONAL DETAILED LANGUAGE NEEDED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO ALL PAID REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS.

AND WITH THAT, THE ADDED LANGUAGE HAS BEEN INPUT INTO THE ATTACHMENTS SO THAT YOU CAN SEE THAT MARKUP.

YOU HAVE HAD MUCH DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS MATTER IN TERMS OF THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT.

I'M GOING TO STEP ASIDE JUST IN CASE ANDREA WANTS TO ADD ANYTHING.

BUT THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THIS IS A RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTING THAT AMENDED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT.

THANK YOU. MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THE ONLY THING THAT I WOULD ADD IS BOND.

COUNSEL ALSO INCLUDED THE MAXIMUM REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE PLAYSCAPE THAT'S TO BE PUT IN SECTIONS ONE AND TWO AT $105,000. THAT'S INCLUDED UNDER THE AMENITIES SECTION OF THAT AGREEMENT.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE AND POINT THAT OUT TO YOU, BECAUSE Y'ALL WERE VERY ADAMANT ABOUT THAT.

RIGHT. GOOD. OKAY.

OKAY. MICHAEL, DO YOU HAVE ANYTHING YOU WANT TO SAY?

[02:00:13]

HEY, GUYS. HELLO.

NOT MUCH. JUST.

WE HAVE OUR HOA MEETING NOW IS SET FOR THE 21ST AT 630.

DOING IT AT THE LIBRARY HERE.

WE HAVE THAT RESERVED.

WE PUT IN SOME SOCCER GOALS OVER THE WEEKEND.

JUST GOT SOME BIDS BACK THIS MORNING ON THE PLAYGROUND.

THEY'RE COMING IN ABOUT 200 TO 250,000.

WE HAVE THREE BIDDERS RIGHT NOW.

WE'RE GOING TO PICK ONE OF THOSE PRETTY SOON.

AND ROCK AND ROLL SOUNDS GOOD.

SORRY. SORRY TO INTERRUPT.

SO WHEN IS THE HOA MEETING? 21ST 21ST? MAY 21ST. YES, MA'AM.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. COUNCIL.

DO I HAVE ANY ACTION? WHILE WE'RE ON THIS AGREEMENT.

AND WHILE YOU'RE THINKING, I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO ADD THAT PURSUANT TO YOUR INSTRUCTIONS, I'VE BEEN IN COMMUNICATION WITH THE ATTORNEY FOR THE DEVELOPER AND REVISED COVENANTS WITH INDEMNIFICATION FOR THE CITY HAVE BEEN DRAFTED.

AND MR. CANNON, THEIR ATTORNEY, IS ALSO PREPARING AN ANCILLARY AGREEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF PROTECTING THE CITY WHERE THIS PLAYSCAPE IS GOING.

SO THAT'S IN THE WORKS.

JUST DON'T HAVE THE FINAL DOCUMENTS YET.

OKAY. THAT THIS IS ALL WORKING OUT FOR THE RESIDENTS OVER THERE.

WELL, IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL ANY BETTER.

MICHAEL, I HAVE DRIVEN BY AND I HAVE SEEN KIDS UTILIZING YOUR GOALS.

SO YOU'VE HELPED YOUR RESIDENTS.

BELIEVE IT OR NOT, THERE HAVE BEEN KIDS OUT THERE ACTUALLY KICKING THE BALLS AND SCORING THEM.

SO THAT'S REALLY GOOD.

COUNCIL DRIVE ACTION.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 2020 404 20 3-016, AN AMENDED AND RESTATED REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR RURAL ROAD RANCH NORTH PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT BETWEEN CITY OF ANGLETON AND RIVERWOOD RANCH, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY.

DOES IT NEED TO BE CONDITIONED ON THE HOA VISION? COVENANTS. COVENANTS? I REALLY WE DON'T HAVE THE LUXURY.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY MORE TIME LEFT BECAUSE WE'RE MOVING TOWARDS BONDING.

BUT I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO INDICATION THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

AND IN FACT, I'LL MAKE SURE IT HAPPENS.

THANK YOU. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DANIEL FOR APPROVAL.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM NUMBER 17.

DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE A PROPOSAL WITH HDR FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE HENDERSON ROAD ROADWAY ALIGNMENT.

[17. Discussion and possible action to approve a proposal with HDR for Engineering Services for the Henderson Road Roadway Alignment, Amendment No.1.]

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE.

GOOD EVENING. COUNCIL.

AT THE TWO WEEK, TWO MEETINGS AGO, WE CAME UP AND STARTED TALKING A LITTLE BIT ABOUT HENDERSON ROAD AND HOW THE LAYOUT OF EVERYTHING WAS WITH MEDIANS WITHOUT MEDIANS.

YOU KNOW HOW YOU WANT TO APPROACH IT WITH SIDEWALKS SIZE OF SIDEWALKS, ALL THAT NATURE.

AT THAT MEETING ACTUALLY, THE RECOMMENDATION I THOUGHT IT WAS A GOOD RECOMMENDATION WAS, IS TO KIND OF PUT A TASK FORCE TOGETHER TO BRING COUNSEL, TO BRING THE SCHOOL DISTRICT, TO BRING YOUR, YOUR EMERGENCY SERVICES MAYBE TRY TO GET SOME PEOPLE FROM THE COMMUNITY TO GET ON THIS TASK FORCE TO WHERE THE PEOPLE HAVE A SAY IN WHAT IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE TO WHERE, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE NOT JUST MAKING THAT DECISION ALL BY YOURSELF, THAT YOU'VE HAD INPUT FROM PEOPLE THERE.

SO WHAT WE DID IS WE CAME UP WITH AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT WHERE WE HELP THE CITY CREATE A TEN MEMBER TASK FORCE.

WE WORKED WITH STAFF ON IDENTIFYING WHO THEY WOULD BE CONTACTING THEM.

FROM THERE.

IT'S ESTIMATED THAT WE'LL HAVE TWO MEETINGS FOR THIS TASK FORCE, ONE KIND OF LAYOUT.

TALK ABOUT WHAT WE HAVE GET SOME IDEAS FROM THERE.

GO BACK, PUT IT TOGETHER.

COME BACK ON THE SECOND ONE, HAVE EVERYBODY LOOK AT THE IDEAS AND FINALIZE IT, AND THEN APPROACH COUNCIL WITH THOSE IDEAS.

AND THEN FINALIZE THE HENDERSON ROADWAY ALIGNMENT STUDY.

[02:05:05]

I DON'T THINK YOU'VE EVER PUT TOGETHER A TASK FORCE BEFORE, DID YOU? THE ONLY ONE WE'VE EVER PUT TOGETHER WAS JUST FOR THE STREET ASSESSMENT PROJECT.

AND YOU DIDN'T PUT THE TASK FORCE TOGETHER.

YOU JUST HELPED FACILITATE IT.

FACILITATE IT. RIGHT? AND I'LL WORK WITH STAFF.

WE WANT TO HAVE TWO MEMBERS FROM COUNCIL, TWO MEMBERS FROM RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS IN THERE.

YOU KNOW, ANGLETON ISD, HOW MANY WE WANT TO HAVE OVER THERE? I'M SURE YOU'RE GOING TO WANT TO HAVE THE BUS FORGOT HER NAME.

THE TRANSPORTATION LADY AND ALSO THE STAFF THAT ORDERS ALL THE FOOD TO PICK UP ALL THAT STUFF, YOU KNOW, HAVE THEM IN THERE SO THEY CAN KIND OF TALK ABOUT THOSE MULTIPLE DRIVEWAYS THAT WAS BROUGHT UP, YOU KNOW, DO THEY REALLY NEED THOSE MULTIPLE JOBS NOW THAT IT'S NO LONGER A HIGH SCHOOL? IT'S A IT'S A IT'S A MIDDLE SCHOOL NOW.

RIGHT. YOU KNOW, DO THEY NEED ALL THOSE.

WHAT WOULD THAT HAPPEN IF IF IT DIDN'T WORK RIGHT.

YOU KNOW. I NOMINATE JOHN WRIGHT TO BE ON THAT COMMITTEE. YOU NEED SOMETHING ELSE TO DO, I THOUGHT.

I THOUGHT I SAW HIM AT HOME ALL NIGHT.

EXACTLY. I WOULD NOT BE VERY HAPPY TO SERVE ON THAT COMMITTEE.

I WANT TO SEE THIS ROAD FIXED.

YEAH. THE IDEA OF A TASK FORCE IS A GOOD ONE.

AND THAT IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THAT TOPIC HAS COME UP ASSOCIATED WITH HENDERSON ROAD.

A HARD TIME GETTING TEN PEOPLE TOGETHER ALL AT ONE TIME AND MEETING THEIR VARIOUS OBLIGATIONS.

BUT I GUESS MAYBE IF THE PERSON WHO'S DESIGNATED AS THE MEMBER CAN'T COME, THEY'LL JUST HAVE TO SEND SOME ASSIGNED PERSON TO COME STAND IN THEIR PLACE.

BUT AGAIN.

CAN'T EMPHASIZE ENOUGH THE NEED TO MOVE FORWARD, RIGHT? NOT TO. I CAN'T MAKE THAT MEETING OR SEND SOMEBODY TO YOUR STAFF BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT IT'S GOING TO COME.

THAT WAS MY ONLY HESITATION IN THIS WHOLE THING WAS, OH, WE'RE PUTTING A TASK FORCE TOGETHER.

IT'S GOING TO CAUSE US TO GO ANOTHER 3 OR 4 MONTHS BEFORE WE DO ANYTHING.

IF Y'ALL WANT TO REDUCE THAT NUMBER DOWN TO SEVEN TO WHERE YOU'RE NOT, IT CUTS DOWN ON SOME OF THE SCHEDULE WRANGLING.

WHATEVER Y'ALL WANT, I'M UP.

OBVIOUSLY, THE SCHOOL DISTRICT NEEDS TO BE INVOLVED PRETTY HEAVILY, HEAVILY.

BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS.

IF YOU'RE GOING TO BRING IT BACK TO CITY COUNCIL, I MEAN, YOU'LL HAVE THE CHANCE TO GET YOUR INPUT THERE AS LONG AS VOLUNTEER TO BE ON THAT TASK FORCE.

OKAY. SO SO THE OTHER THING IS I SENT YOU ALL THE BOND SCHEDULE YESTERDAY OR SOMETHING.

SO WE WON'T GET THE MONEY TO AUGUST TO DO THE RIGHT OF WAY STUFF THAT WE'VE ALREADY ALREADY TASKING HDR TO DO.

SO THAT'S THAT'S A YEAR LONG ISH PROCESS ANYWAYS.

SO UNLESS WE GET ANOTHER BOND, WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING ELSE ON HENDERSON ROAD FOR A YEAR ISH AT LEAST.

SO THAT'S YOU KNOW, WE TALK ABOUT TIME TO SET UP AND YOU KNOW, DO THE TASK FORCE.

I DON'T I REALLY DON'T THINK IT'S A BIG DEAL BECAUSE AGAIN WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET ANY KIND OF MONEY.

WE'VE ALREADY GOT THAT PROGRAM FOR SOMETHING.

YOU KNOW IT'S ALL.

WE SHOULD BE MOVING DIRT IN A YEAR AND A YEAR AND A HALF AT MOST.

I KNOW I HEAR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION, BUT COUNCILMAN BOOTH GAVE A GOOD POINT THAT THAT LAST MEETING ON THIS ITEM AND WE CAN SQUEEZE IT DOWN.

WE DON'T HAVE TO DO ALL THE RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION.

WE CAN FIND THE AREAS OF THAT ROAD THAT WE CAN REALLY START WORKING ON.

YEAH, IT'S BUT IF WE'RE GOING TO DO THAT, THEN WE NEED TO HAVE MORE MONEY BECAUSE WHAT? WHAT MONEY ARE WE GOING TO USE TO TURN DIRT.

WE'VE GOT 5 MILLION.

YOU THINK IT'S GOING TO COST 5 MILLION AN ACQUISITION OR RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION.

WELL, BUT YOU GUYS ALSO HAVE OTHER ROAD PROJECTS THAT YOU'VE IDENTIFIED.

THE WIRE STREET I HAVE BEEN VERY CLEAR ON MY SIDE.

5 MILLION FOR HENDERSON ROAD.

WE JUST HAD SOMEBODY HIT AND KILLED LAST WEEK ON HENDERSON ROAD.

YES. DID YOU Y'ALL HAD IT.

OKAY. WE'VE GOT TO DO SOMETHING ON THAT ROAD.

I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND ALL THE PRIORITIES OF ALL THE REST OF THE OTHER STREETS IN THE CITY, BUT THAT HAS GOT TO BE A FOCUS.

THE TRAFFIC BACKING UP FROM DALLAS VALDERAS TO DOWNING OR DOWNING TO VALDERAS, DEPENDING ON THE TIME OF DAY.

IT IS BAD, MAYOR.

$5 MILLION AIN'T GOING TO TOUCH THIS JOB.

[02:10:02]

IT'S GOT TO START IT. $5 MILLION.

I WON'T TOUCH THIS, WON'T BE ABLE TO GET ANYTHING DONE FOR $5 MILLION IN HERE FOR WE NEED TO GO OUT FOR A BOND ELECTION TO GET THE MONEY.

LET THE PEOPLE TELL US THEY WANT TO SPEND THE MONEY ON THIS PROJECT AND TO GET TO GET THE FUNDS AVAILABLE.

ARE WE JUST GOING TO BE NICKEL AND DIME ON THIS PROJECT? AND IT WOULD BE. ALL OF US WILL BE DEAD IN OUR GRAVES AND OUR CHILDREN WILL BE BUILDING THIS.

WE WANT TO BE COMMITTED TO DOING IT.

WE NEED TO ASK THE PEOPLE TO GET ON BOARD WITH THIS TO FUND THE PROJECT.

THE THING ABOUT THIS PROJECT IS YOU GOT TO MOST PROJECTS, YOU START AT THE OUTFALL.

THIS OUTFALL IS LOCATED EAST.

YEAH. AND YOU NEED MORE HELP ON THE WEST.

SO YOU'VE GOT TO HAVE THAT DEPTH IN ORDER TO CARRY THAT PIPE, BECAUSE IF NOT, YOU'RE SETTING YOURSELF UP FOR POTENTIAL ISSUES IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT TO KEEP IT DRAINING NOW.

YOU KNOW, AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION.

SO I MEAN, THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE'LL DO IS LOOK AT PHASING.

I MEAN, THAT'S PART OF THE WHOLE PROCESS.

BUT IT'S GOT TO MAKE.

SO, JOHN, OF THAT $50 MILLION TO PUT THE DRAINAGE UNDERGROUND, WHAT DOES THAT COST? I CAN GET YOU THAT NUMBER.

I DON'T HAVE THAT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.

I'LL JUST TELL YOU THAT.

I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S ADDRESSING THE SAFETY ISSUE.

YOU GOT TO PUT THAT DRAINAGE UNDERGROUND FIRST BEFORE YOU CAN PUT SIDEWALKS OR BIGGER SHOULDERS OR WHATEVER WE'RE GOING TO DO.

YEAH, I'LL PULL THAT COST OUT TOMORROW.

WHAT WOULD IT TAKE? IF. WE FOLLOWED COUNCILWOMAN BOOTH'S SUGGESTION AND WE WANTED TO PUT IT UP TO A VOTE.

WHAT ARE THE STEPS AND PROCESSES TO SO I CAN RESEND THAT TO YOU? BUT OUR BOND ATTORNEY SAID BASICALLY YOU'D HAVE TO VOTE TO PUT IT ON ON AN ELECTION STARTING IN JULY, AND THAT WOULD CREATE THE PROCESS THAT IT WOULD END UP GOING ON THE NOVEMBER BALLOT.

OKAY. THAT'S MY QUESTION, I GUESS.

YEAH. I WISH SEEING HOW NO, NO, YOU ANSWERED IT FOR ME.

FROM MY MIND, I WAS CURIOUS AT THE EARLIEST, WE COULD ACTUALLY ALLOW THE PEOPLE OF ANGLETON TO VOTE ON IT IF WE WERE SO INCLINED.

AND THAT'S APPROXIMATELY $12,000 IN ADDITIONAL FUNDS THAT WE WOULD NEED FOR ELECTION COSTS TO PAY THE COUNTY TO PUT IT ON THE BALLOT.

WELL, IN MY OPINION, IT'S.

WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT I GOT GOING ON OVER HERE.

THESE TWO ARE FIGHTING EACH OTHER.

RIGHT NOW. YOU KNOW.

THAT'S OKAY. WE'LL WAIT FOR YOU.

GO AHEAD. NOW I'M JUST THROWING IT OUT THERE.

I MEAN, IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A CONVERSATION AND IF YOU WANT TO BE SERIOUS ABOUT THAT CONVERSATION AND YOU KNOW. I WERE GIVEN MY PERSONAL OPINION, I WOULD HESITATE TO VOTE FOR IT, BUT WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT THE TAX IMPLICATIONS ARE.

BUT I SEE MR. BOOTH'S POINT AND PUTTING IT TO THE CITIZENS TO VOTE ON.

AND IF THEY WANT TO SELL PASS IT, THEN THAT WOULD BE THE CONSENSUS OF THE MAJORITY MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS.

ONCE THIS TASK FORCE IDENTIFIES THE CROSS SECTION OF THE TO BRING TO COUNCIL TO GET APPROVED.

WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A POTENTIAL IMPACT AT 30 MILLION PULLED OUT OF THE PROJECT, 4 MILLION PULLED OUT OF THE PROJECT.

THAT'S HOW BIG THIS STEP REALLY IS.

THAT I BELIEVE BY DOING THE TASK FORCE, AS IT WAS MENTIONED, YOU'RE GETTING YOUR PUBLIC BUY IN TO WHERE THERE'S A CHANCE TO GET THE COMMUNITY ACTIVE, WHERE THEY CAN GO TALK TO PEOPLE AND GET THEIR COMMENTS AND COME BACK TO THE STREET TASK FORCE.

AND WE INCORPORATE THOSE IDEAS.

I WILL SAY BEEN TO SEVERAL MEETINGS, LISTENED TO THE SUPERINTENDENT TALK.

IF YOU'RE EVER INTERESTED IN GETTING A BOND, YOU MIGHT WANT TO DO IT NOW, BECAUSE I CAN PROMISE YOU PROBABLY ABOUT A YEAR AND A HALF, TWO YEARS EVER GOING OUT FOR ANOTHER BOND FOR THE ISD. SO IT'S.

[02:15:03]

YOU MAY WANT TO SQUEEZE IN WHILE YOU CAN BEFORE THEY GET ANOTHER BALL AND PASS THROUGH, AND MORE MONEY GOES TO THEM.

SO JUST IT'S ALL ABOUT TIMING.

AND SO IT'S NOT ALL ABOUT IT, BUT THAT COULD BE PART OF THE CONSIDERATION.

YOU'RE SAYING IT'S GOING TO COST 4 MILLION TO DESIGN IT? NO. THE THE DIFFERENCE IN WITH THE MEDIAN, YOU KNOW, WITH THE MEDIAN ON IT, THE AMOUNT OF EFFORT TO GO AND DO ALL THE ACQUISITION, THE PROPERTY, THE METES AND BOUNDS, THE TURN, YOU KNOW, EVERYTHING FOR THAT.

THAT HAS AN IMPACT OF THAT IN THAT 50 MILLION.

WE'VE GOT TO BUDGET FOR LIKE 4 MILLION, $3 MILLION.

RIGHT. SO SAY WE SAID COME BACK AND WE SAY, HEY, LOOK, WE WANT TO GO WITH THE NO MEDIAN, THE LEAST AMOUNT OF IMPACT ALL THE WAY THROUGH.

WELL THEN WE GO BACK AND WE TAKE THAT $4 MILLION AND NARROW IT DOWN TO WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO NEED.

SO IT HAS A DIRECT IMPACT OF HOW THIS PROJECT'S GOING TO PROCEED FORWARD.

ABSOLUTELY. SO THAT'S THAT'S REALLY WHAT WE REALLY NEED TO DO IS SEE WHAT PROPERTIES ARE ABSOLUTELY REQUIRED, WHAT PROPERTIES ARE NOT.

AND THAT'LL GIVE US A PATH FORWARD ON THAT, BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE YOUR PATH FOR I MEAN, YOU CAN'T EVEN REALLY DO A SURVEY OR TO DO THE THINGS YOU NEED TO DO UNTIL YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ON THAT PROPERTY WITH WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING.

CHRIS, DO YOU HAVE A FEW NAMES IN YOUR HIP POCKET? WHO ARE YOU GOING TO ASK TO BE ON THIS TASK FORCE OR HAS THERE OUTSIDE OF CITY COUNCIL? I MEAN, I THINK, AS JOHN SUGGESTED, YOU KNOW, THE FIRST RESPONDERS, THE SCHOOL.

COUPLE RESIDENTS THAT LIVE ALONG IN THOSE NEIGHBORHOODS.

AND WE CAN CERTAINLY THEN ONCE WE ARE APPROVED, START SOLICITING FOR THAT THROUGH PUBLIC COMMENT.

WHO WANTS TO BE ON THE HENDERSON ROAD TASK FORCE? AND AND THEN WE CAN MAKE SELECTIONS FROM THERE AND, AND WHITTLE IT DOWN TO WHATEVER NUMBER Y'ALL SELECT.

AND THEN WE'LL COME UP WITH A MILESTONE OF MEETINGS AND, YOU KNOW, FEEDBACK TO THE COUNCIL AND WHATEVER ON THE TASK FORCE, WE CAN COORDINATE WITH SOME OF THE HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS LIKE OBERM RANCHO.

I ALSO GOT THE CONTACT KYLE GOT ME THE CONTACT FOR HERITAGE PARK, THAT LITTLE SUBDIVISION THERE WHERE YOU HAVE ONE ON THE EAST, ONE ON THE WEST.

YOU KNOW, WHERE THEY HAVE SOME INPUT ON HOW IT'S GOING TO LOOK OR HOW IT'S GOING TO AFFECT THEIR DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES.

NORTHWAY BAPTIST. MAYBE.

INTERESTED? YES.

IT'S AARON PURDUE. OKAY.

THAT'S A GOOD ONE. IT'S A REAL GOOD ONE.

MAYBE THE LUTHERAN CHURCH.

WE NEED ACTION. YES.

OKAY. COUNCIL.

THIS INVOLVES MONEY. MOVE TO APPROVE A CONTRACT.

AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE FOR HDR FOR $12,835.

PERFORMING HENDERSON ROADWAY ALIGNMENT.

PUT TOGETHER A TEN MEMBER TASK FORCE.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DANIEL.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

I'M GOING TO REMAIN OPTIMISTIC.

ABOUT WHAT? HOW FAR $5 MILLION GOES.

OKAY. OUR NUMBER 18 UPDATE DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES GRANT FOR 28 B AND THE PROPOSED UTILITY

[18. Update, discussion and possible action on the Transportation Alternatives grant for 288B and the proposed utility improvements on 288B from Cedar to Orange.]

IMPROVEMENTS ON 28. BE CONSIDERED ORANGE.

ALL RIGHT. THIS IS AN ACTUAL UPDATE OF WHERE WE ARE.

EVERYTHING THAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW.

WE HAVE ACTUALLY SUBMITTED A FIRST PACKAGE THAT WAS REQUESTED TEXDOT ON SOME OF THE INFORMATION, THE AGREEMENT, ALL THAT STUFF LAST WEEK AND GOT COORDINATION BACK FROM THEM.

SO THAT WE COULD START PREPARING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN EVERYBODY KNOW WHO'S ALL GOING TO BE A PART OF IT FOR THE FAA.

[02:20:07]

THE ADVANCE FUNDING AGREEMENT.

THAT'S THAT'S THE THING THAT WE GOT RIGHT NOW.

WE MET WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT'S ALL REQUIRED, WHAT'S ALL NEEDED.

OUR GOAL IS TO HAVE THIS TO TXDOT WITHIN TWO WEEKS TO HAVE THE CITY BUNDLE.

THEY'RE GOING TO REVIEW IT, MAKE COMMENTS IS EVERYTHING THAT WE NEED IT PROVIDE IT BACK TO THE CITY.

THE AT THAT POINT WE'LL BRING IT TO COUNCIL FOR A VERIFICATION TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE FAA.