>> IT IS SIC O'CLOCK AND FIVE SECONDS.
[00:00:03]
WE'RE GOING TO GO AND GET STARTED.THIS IS THE CITY OF ANGLETON CITY COUNCIL, REGULAR AGENDA OCTOBER 8, 2024.
WE HAVE A FULL QUORUM PRESENT.
I WANT TO THANK ALL THOSE HERE IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT AND ALL THOSE LISTENING AT HOME.
YOU WILL STAND FOR THE PLEDGE AND REMAIN STANDING FOR THE INVITATION.
>> GOD, WE THANK YOU AGAIN FOR YOUR COST OF LOVE, LOVING AND KINDNESS, FATHER THAT WE CAN TRUST IN YOU AT ALL TIMES.
WE WANT TO PRAY, ESPECIALLY FOR THE PEOPLE IN FLORIDA AS THE STORM APPROACHES THEM.
JUST CONTINUE TO BE THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE SCARED, ASKING YOUR PROTECTION, ASK FOR YOUR GUIDANCE OF THE PEOPLE THAT ARE THE FIRST RESPONDERS THAT WILL BE THERE ON SITE.
I CONTINUE TO PRAY FOR THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN DEVASTATED BY THE RECENT STORM TOO, LORD GOD JUST CONTINUE TO BE NEAR TO THEM.
NOW, TONIGHT, WE'LL ASK YOU TO GIVE US YOUR WISDOM.
HELP US TO DELIBERATE THESE ITEMS IN A WAY THAT WILL BE PLEASING TO YOU AND UPLIFTING TO OUR CITY IN CHRIST NAME WE PRAY.
>> MICHELLE, DO WE HAVE ANY CITIZENS WISHING TO ADDRESS.
>> MOVING ON TO CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS.
[1. Presentation of employee service awards.]
ITEM NUMBER 1, PRESENTATION OF THE EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS. BRANDY.>> TONIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO RECOGNIZE FIREFIGHTER [INAUDIBLE] DIAZ, WHO CAN NOT BE HERE TONIGHT FOR FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE CITY OF ANGLETON FIRE DEPARTMENT.
WE WILL ALSO RECOGNIZE CORPORAL MARISSA CHAPMAN FOR FIVE YEARS OF SERVICE TO THE ANGLETON POLICE DEPARTMENT.
THANK YOU. THAT'S ALL THE SERVICE BOARD.
>> THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO CONSENT AGENDA.
[CONSENT AGENDA]
ITEM NUMBER 2, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE THE 2025 CITY HOLIDAYS.ITEM NUMBER 3, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO FUND THE REPLACEMENT SHADE COVER OVER FREEDOM PARK PLAYGROUND WITH PARKLAND DEDICATION FUNDS.
ITEM NUMBER 4, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 20241008-004, DESIGNATING A REPRESENTATIVE AND ALTERNATE TO THE HGAC OR HOUSTON GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL, 2025 GENERAL ASSEMBLY.
ITEM NUMBER 5, DISCUSSION ON POSSIBLE ACTION TO EXTEND THE CURRENT CONTRACT WITH TETRA TECH DEBRIS MONITORING TO APRIL 31, 2025, DUE TO ACTIVE DEBRIS REMOVAL AND UTILIZATION OF TETRA TECH.
ITEM NUMBER 6. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE ONE WAY TRAFFIC ENTERING NORTH BELL EXITING SOUTH BELL IN THE PLANTATION OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD ON OCTOBER 31, 2024, FROM 5:00 PM -9:00 PM.
AND SEVEN, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE A REQUEST FROM MISSOURI COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ANGLETON CITY COUNCIL FOR A WAIVER OF ALL PERMITTING AND BUILDING FEES ASSOCIATED WITH THE RECONSTRUCTION OF A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AT 709 MARSHALL ROAD IN ANGLETON, TEXAS UNDER THE MISSOURI COUNTY HOME RECONSTRUCTION REHABILITATION PROGRAM. COUNCIL.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BOOTH.
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER DANIEL.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
THAT MOTION CARRIES. ON THE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ACTION ITEMS NUMBER 8.
[8. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on consideration of a substandard structure determination at 504 Farrer Street within the City of Angleton, Texas.]
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON CONSIDERATION OF A STANDARD STRUCTURE DETERMINATION AT 504 FARRER STREET WITHIN THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS.>> HI, GUYS. GOOD EVENING, HEARING COUNCIL.
IN YOUR LAST MEETING, YOU ACCEPT PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR TODAY FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF ACTION ON CONSIDERATION OF A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 504 FARRER STREET WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY.
STAFF HAS FOR SENT ALL PROPER NOTIFICATION FOR OUR CONDEMNATION PROCESS.
THIS IS ONE STAGE IN THE PROCESS WHERE WE WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING.
WE DIDN'T NOTIFY THE OWNERSHIP, HAVE NO EXPECTATIONS OF THEM APPEARING.
HAD THEY APPEARED, THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ABLE TO WORK OUT A SCHEDULE REVIEW TYPICALLY, IN TERMS OF HOW MANY DAYS YOU CAN BRING THE STRUCTURE UP TO CODE.
BUT SINCE THAT HAS NOT OCCURRED AS OF YET, WE CAN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND ASK THAT YOU DETERMINE
[00:05:02]
THE STRUCTURE UNSAFE AND SUBSTANDARD, THEN NEXT PROCEDURE WOULD BE TO WORK ON THE ORDER BY YOUR DIRECTION TO HAVE THE STRUCTURE EITHER CORRECTED OR TORN DOWN WITHIN A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME.WE HAVE NOTED IN THE STAFF REPORT 30 DAYS, BUT WE EXPECT WITH THE PROCESS, THE DOUBLE CHECKING THE RECORDS IN TERMS OF LIENS OR ANYTHING AGAINST THE PROPERTY, SENDING NOTIFICATION OF THE ORDER, WHICH IS THE NEXT STEP OUT TO THE OWNERSHIP AGAIN, CERTIFIED MAIL.
ONCE WE DO THAT FOR LEGAL, WE WILL PROCEED WITH THE DIRECTION TO REMOVE THE STRUCTURE SO RECEIVE THAT.
MOVING PUBLIC HEARING NOW AND MOVING TOWARDS THE ACTION.
>> COUNCIL, DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING?
>> MOTION OF OPEN PUBLIC HEARING.
>> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN DANIEL TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.
ONE MORE TIME. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM. COUNCIL.
>> MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SECOND. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN DANIEL, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
WE ARE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.
>> SHORT DEAL WITH JUST BLOW IT UP YES.
PUT UP TIME IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND FED UP WITH IT.
I THINK ANYTHING LESS THAN OUR HASTE IS GOING TO LOOK [INAUDIBLE]
>> I'VE GOT A MOTION. I GOT A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH SECOND BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.
ONE LAST THING I HAVE IS THE DIFFERENCE IN THE PRICING, WHAT WAS THE DIFFERENCE? WE HAD BUDGETED AT 85, 58? WHAT WAS IT?
>> THE ACCOUNT HAS THE FINAL NUMBERS FOR THIS PARTICULAR. [OVERLAPPING]
>> IT'S ONLY GOING TO COST 10,000 TO DIMA.
>> I HAD THE TWO HAVE TWO VIDEOS LIKE WE DID BEFORE AND ROUGHLY IT WENT UP, BUT ROUGHLY WILL BE UNDER 10.
MAYBE BY 1,000 MAYBE NOT QUITE.
>> THAT WILL BE PUT ON THE LIEN OF THE PROPERTY?
>> ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM?
>> YES. WHAT WAS THE MOTION AGAIN?
>> TEAR DOWN SO YOU GOT TO GO THROUGH LEGAL I REALIZE.
JUST THAT CITY COUNCIL ORDERS THAT THE STRUCTURE BE DEMOLISHED.
THAT'S IT. THAT'S WHAT YOUR ORDINANCE REQUIRES.
>> I THINK THAT'S WHAT HE SAID.
>> CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.
IT'S ALWAYS SAD TO SEE A STRUCTURE BEING TORN DOWN, BUT IT DEFINITELY NEEDS IT.
WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON THIS ONE FOR A LONG TIME.
>> YOU KNOW, THERE ARE OTHERS.
>> I'M NOT SAD ABOUT THIS ONE AND I'M NOT GOING TO BE SAD ABOUT THE OTHERS.
LET'S NOT LOSE OUR MOMENTUM HERE.
>> MOVING ON TO REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 9,
[9. Discussion and possible action to approve a Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Windrose Green Section 6.]
DISCUSSION ON POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 6.>> THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THIS FIRST ITEM IS SECTION 6 OF WINDROSE GREEN PRELIMINARY PLAT.
I HAVE COPIED YOU JUST IN FRONT OF YOU THE MOST RECENT LAND PLAN THAT SHOWS 6,7 AND 8 IN TERMS OF THE SECTION.
WE ALSO HAVE THE LOT MIX, AS YOU SEE ON THE TABLE THERE, AND THEN THERE'S A FLIP SIDE OF WHAT YOU HAVE RIGHT BEFORE THE CHART THAT SHOWS THAT MIX PER SECTION.
SO CONSISTENTLY, YOU'VE SEEN MOST OF THE SECTIONS BEFORE WITH SOME MINOR BOUNDARY CHANGES, BUT NONE OF THE LOT NUMBERS HAVE CHANGED.
SO WHAT YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU HAS GONE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
AS YOU SEE, THEY VOTED 6-0 BRANCHING CONDITIONAL APPROVAL TO YOU SUBJECT TO EVERYTHING BEING DECLARED BY THE CITY ENGINEER, WHICH HE HAS SUBMITTED TO LET OF NO OBJECTION FOR THE THREE SECTIONS.
[00:10:01]
I THINK WE HAVE ALL OF THOSE ON THE SCREEN.YOU CAN JUST KEEP VOTING THAT.
WE ALSO HAVE ON RECORD THE WAIVER OF THE 30 DAY TIME CLOCK RESTRAINTS THAT WE SOMETIMES HAVE BECAUSE OF HAVING TO FORWARD IT FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO YOU.
WE DO HAVE THAT ON RECORD AS WELL.
PLANNING COMMISSION A STAFF IS ASKING THAT COUNCIL WHAT APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT FOR SECTION 6.
SEE SECRETARY HAS ASKED THAT I DO THESE SEPARATELY, I WOULD HAVE COMBINED THEM, BUT WE MOVE ACCORDINGLY.
>> SHE'S TRYING TO GET HER TWO HOUR ALONG. [LAUGHTER].
>> IT MAKES IT EASIER WITH THE RECORD.
>> ALL CSV IS UNDER TWO HOURS. SHE WENT.
>> THE APPLICANTS ARE AVAILABLE IF YOU NEED ANY UPDATES FROM THE TEAM HERE.
>> YEAH. I GUESS MY QUESTION IS AND THIS JUST GOES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IN TOTAL.
THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, WAS THERE ANY LIMITATION OR STANDARD SET OUT ON LOT SIZES?
>> YEAH. THE SPECIFIC LOT SIZE MIX IS IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
>> SO WHAT WAS THE LAYOUT? WHAT WAS THE PARAMETERS?
>> I DON'T KNOW, BUT I CAN PULL IT UP AND TELL YOU.
>> I APPRECIATE IT. THE REASON I ASK IS THERE'S NOT A SINGLE LOT BUILT GREATER THAN 50 FEET IN WIDTH.
I'M JUST TRYING TO FIND OUT I THOUGHT IF I WAS REMEMBERING CORRECTLY, THEY HAD REPRESENTED TO US THERE WOULD BE A MIXTURE AND I GUESS.
>> THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ONLY SAID A MINIMUM NUMBER.
>> IT SET OUT ANY MINIMUM NUMBER FOR 60 FOOT LOT?
>> YEAH. I JUST WANT TO KNOW HOW IT'S PHRASED.
IN THE FUTURE, WE DON'T DO THIS.
DON'T GET ME WRONG. YOU'RE GOING TO MAKE YOUR MONEY, AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE IN THE BUSINESS OF.
BUT THIS IS WHAT WE CALL A MIXTURE IS 45 AND 50 FEET, AND I KNOW PEOPLE LIKE TO CROW ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE WITH FIVE FEET.
BUT IT'S NOT. I KNOW THERE'S 40 FEET, WHICH IS ACTUALLY SMALLER.
>> THAT ONE I HADN'T EVEN HOUSE HAS BEEN BUILT IN SECTION 3.
ARE THEY ALONG THE LONG SIDE, MOUNTAIN ROAD NOT THE ROAD THAT GOES TO ANDERSON.
>> SECTION 3 IS ABOUT HALFWAY BUILT OUT.
>> IT'S ON THE NORTH SIDE OF IT.
YOU HAVEN'T COME ALL THE WAY DOWN.
>> SOUTH SIDE OF THE DEVELOPMENT, BUT NORTH.
>> I JUST DROVE BY THE GO DANE AND I THOUGHT, WELL, THERE'S STILL QUITE A BIT TO BUILD OUT OVER HERE.
WHY I SHOCKED WE WERE MOVING ON TO 6,7 AND 8.
>> WITH ALL EIGHT SECTIONS IN THE COMMUNITY, THE LOT MIXTURE IS SPLIT THAT WAY THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY NOT NECESSARILY PER PLAT. SOME OF THEM ARE.
>> WHAT WE'RE SAYING IS THERE'S NO MIX BETWEEN LARGER LOT 60 FOOT NO.
WE TRY TO KEEP THE 60 FOOT MINIMUM AND ANGLES.
SO GOING LESS THAN THAT AND THE MIXTURE IS 40, 45, 50 RIGHT THERE, THERE'S NOTHING BIGGER.
GREYSTONE HAS 70 IF I'M PERFECT.
>> CAN I TELL YOU WHAT THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT SAYS?
>> ON LOT SIZE, THE PARTIES AGREE THAT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WILL BE AT LEAST 4,600 SQUARE FEET WITH A MINIMUM 40 FOOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT AND THE OTHER DIMENSIONS IN AREAS STATED IN SECTION 2.1.
SO GOT THAT MINIMUM AND THEN 2.1 DOESN'T ONLY TALK ABOUT THE SIZE.
IT TALKS ABOUT REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS ON THE DENSITY.
PARTIES AGREE THAT THE NUMBER OF SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOUSING UNITS WITHIN THE PROPERTY SHALL NOT EXCEED 660 UNITS.
>> YOU SHOULD HAVE NO MORE THAN 660 HOMES WITH AT LEAST 40 FEET WIDE.
I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE IN THERE ON LOT SIZE.
[00:15:07]
>> FOR ME. I THINK THIS I MEAN, I WON'T BE HERE ON COUNCIL FOREVER.
FUTURE PEOPLE WILL MAKE DECISIONS, WHATEVER THEY WANT TO MAKE.
BUT I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT WE NEVER AGREE TO SOMETHING LIKE THIS AGAIN.
IT'S NOT THAT IT'S NOT A NICE PROPERTY.
IT'S THEY'VE DONE A GOOD JOB OF DRIVING THROUGH THERE.
SEEMS TO BE A NICE DEVELOPMENT.
BUT I THINK WE'VE DONE A GOOD JOB OF SATISFYING SMALL LOTS.
WE HAVE NOW PROVIDED 650 JUST ON THE OUTSKIRTS OF TOWN.
WE'VE GOT A SEVERAL OTHER SUBDIVISIONS THAT ARE IN THE WORKS THAT HAVE SMALLER.
IF WE WANTED TRUE DIVERSITY, WE'D ACTUALLY GO UP AND NOT DOWN.
WE'RE SWIMMING IN SMALLER LOTS.
>> I THINK WE ALL KNOW THAT THESE DEVELOPMENTS DON'T WEATHER TIME VERY WELL.
>> THIS'S GOING TO BE AN ISSUE.
SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT WE TRY TO ADDRESS IN OUR CHANGES AS FAR AS, DEPTH OF DRIVEWAY, SETBACKS, BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF THOSE SAME, HURDLES, AND THAT IS CARS POKED ON THE ROAD, GOING TO MAKE IT TO TOUGH TO TRAVEL THROUGH THE ROAD OR PASSING THROUGH STREETS.
NOW, OF COURSE, BUYERS KNOW WHAT THEY'RE BUYING.
THERE'S NO SURPRISES OF WHAT THEY'RE ENTERING INTO.
BUT I'D LIKE TO THINK THAT ANGLETON IS NOT JUST ANOTHER CITY FULL OF MASTER PLAN COMMUNITIES THAT YOU CAN'T TELL IF THEY'RE IN ANGLETON OR KATIE OR SUGARLAND OR WEBSTER, I MEAN, IT'S JUST ANOTHER SO IT JUST LOOKS NO DIFFERENT.
IT'S JUST ANOTHER CRAFTED TOGETHER THAT, CHECKS A FEW BOXES HERE AND A FEW BOXES THERE.
THEY GOT SOME DETENTION, AND I'M SURE THEY'VE PUT SOME LANDSCAPING, WHICH THEY'VE DONE.
BUT THAT'S JUST MY PERSONAL OPINION.
>> HAVE YOU STARTED THE SIDEWALK YET? THAT THE HIGH SCHOOL.
>> YES, THEY MADE THE FINAL REPORT TODAY.
>> I'VE RECEIVED A LOT OF COMPLIMENTS ON YOUR SUBDIVISION SO FAR.
MOST PEOPLE THAT ARE OVER THERE HAVE ALL BEEN VERY HAPPY SATISFIED.
I AGREE WITH MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND THAT WE DON'T NEED MORE SMALL LOTS, WE NEED LARGER.
I KNOW THAT'S NOT THE DIRECTION OF THE BUILDERS OR THE DEVELOPERS THESE DAYS.
OTIS, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.
BECAUSE OF THE CHANGE WE MADE AND BECAUSE WE ALREADY HAD THE THE DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT, THEY'RE NOT SUBJECT TO THE NEW REGULATIONS THAT WE PUT IN PLACE, CORRECT?
>> YES. TYPICALLY, BUT THEY'RE NOT SUBJECT TO WHAT WE DID RECENTLY.
MOST OF YOUR NEWER PLATS AND NEW SUBDIVISIONS, THEY WOULD BE GUIDED BY THOSE PRINCIPLES.
IF THERE WERE SUBDIVISIONS THAT WERE A PLATTED PREVIOUSLY WITH RECORDED LOTS THAT ACTUALLY SHOWED OTHER STEP BACK AND WIDTHS AND WHAT HAVE YOU, THOSE WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THOSE PLATS AND AGREEMENTS OF THOSE ALREADY PLATTED SUBDIVISIONS.
BUT ON THE LOT BY LOT INFIELD LOTS, NEW PLATS.
WE'RE APPLYING THE NEW STANDARD.
>> NEW PLATS DO APPLY TO THE NEW STANDARD. MANY NEW PLATS.
>> THIS IS A PRELIMINARY PLAT.
>> I JUST THE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT TRUMPS IT.
>> WELL, IT DOUBLY TRUMPS IT BECAUSE NOT ONLY DO WE HAVE AN AGREEMENT ABOUT WHAT'S GOING TO GO IN, BUT WE ALSO HAVE AN AGREEMENT ABOUT VESTED RIGHTS.
THE BEST THING, OF COURSE, IS BY VIRTUE OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
IT'S A DOUBLE WHAMMY FOR THE CITY BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT THE AGREEMENT, AND THEN YOU'VE GOT THE AGREEMENT THAT YOU'RE AGREEING TO THE BESTING THAT'S SET OUT IN THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE.
THEY'RE FROZEN IN TIME, SO TO SPEAK.
THAT EVERYTHING THAT WAS APPLICABLE AT THE TIME OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT IS APPLICABLE TO THE DEVELOPMENT.
>> IS THERE ANY JUST SO I UNDERSTAND THIS IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THIS MIGHT COME UP AGAIN IN THE FUTURE? BECAUSE THEY'RE COMPLETELY OUTSIDE THE CITY, DOES THAT HAVE ANY RAMIFICATION ON US.
BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN MUD. THEY'RE OUTSIDE THE CITY MUD.
[00:20:02]
>> THAT'S RIGHT. THEY'RE NOT IN CITY LIMITS.
BUT BY VIRTUE BY VIRTUE OF THE AGREEMENT, YOU HAVE SOME CONTROL.
LACKING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, YOU HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO CONTROL.
THAT'S THE SUITE IN THE SOWER THAT COMES WITH DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS IN YOUR ETJ, THAT MIGHT NOT BE EXACTLY THE WAY THAT YOU WOULD LIKE IT AS YOU WOULD INSIDE YOUR CITY LIMITS.
HOWEVER, YOU HAVE SOME CONTROL.
YOU HAVE CONTRACTUAL CAUSES OF ACTION SHOULD YOU NEED THEM, BY VIRTUE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT?
>> ONE LAST QUESTION I HAVE, CHIEF.
DO WE GET A LOT OF CALLS OUT THERE?
>> I KNOW YOU GET CALL A LOT OF CALLS FOR SERVICE IN ONE OF THE OTHER NEW SUBDIVISIONS.
>> YES, SIR TYPICALLY, THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE WOULD RESPOND TO THAT.
HOWEVER, OUR RESPOND TIMES A LOT QUICKER.
SOMEBODY TRIED TO BREAK IN HER VAN OUT THERE, CITY MAN.
WE DO RESPOND TO CALLS OUT THERE AND A LOT.
I DON'T I I THINK IT'S TYPICAL ALARMS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT WE RESPOND.
>> COUNSEL, ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS?
>> I COULDN'T REMEMBER. I REMEMBER ONE OF THE LOPER TALKED TO AND IT WAS KIND OF AGAIN, A BROADER DEFINITION OF [OVERLAPPING] MIX.
WELL, MIX, AND IT DIDN'T I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH IT WAS THIS SUBDIVISION OR ANOTHER.
>> THAT WAS A BYPRODUCT OF THIS.
THAT LOT MIXTURE AND THAT LOT DISCUSSION IN THAT AGREEMENT IS A BYPRODUCT OF CITY COUNSEL NOT BEING PLEASED WITH THIS.
>> I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW, NOT TO TAKE AWAY FROM ANYTHING ELSE YOU'VE DONE OUT THERE.
IT'S A NICE PLACE. IT REALLY IS.
JUST THE WORK YOU PUT INTO IT.
I JUST WISH EVERYONE WASN'T SO CRAMMED ON TOP OF EACH OTHER OVER THERE.
I I KNOW WE HELD YOU TO THE FIRE ON THE DRAINAGE, AND WE HELD IT UP A COUPLE OF TIMES BECAUSE OF THE DRAINAGE.
EVERY TIME IT'S RAINED REALLY HARD.
I'VE DRIVEN OVER THERE, FIRST PLACE I GO, AND IT'S DRAINING PROPERLY, AND IT'S NOT FLOODING THE NEIGHBORS, SO I APPRECIATE THAT.
>> YEAH, I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT THAT YOU DON'T TAKE THE THINGS WE'RE SAYING AS A KNOCK AGAINST CRAFTSMANSHIP, DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, ALL THOSE THINGS.
YOU GUYS DID PRETTY MUCH ELICIT WHAT YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO DO.
DEALING WITH THE COUNCIL THAT WOULD PREFER MORE OF AN ESTATE TYPE OF MIXTURE.
>> BUT COUNSEL, JUST TO BE CLEAR, WE HAVE A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT THAT SPELLS IT OUT THAT WE ARE BOUND TO, SO.
>> MICHAEL B, MY MOTION A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR WINDROSE GREEN SECTION SIX SUBDIVISION.
>> I HAD A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? HEARING NONE, CALL FOR THE VOTE.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
[10. Discussion and possible action to approve a Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Windrose Green Section 7.]
DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS TO APPROVE A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT TO WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 7. VOSSYOU HAVE BEFORE YOU, PRELIMINARY PLAT, WINDOW SCREEN, SECTION 7.
THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION, 62 LOCKS.
YOU ALSO HAD THE LOT MIX RIGHT BEFORE YOU FOR SECTION 7, WHICH WERE 45 AND 50 FOOT LOCKS.
AT THAT TOTAL, THE CITY ENGINEER DID REVIEW THE PLAT.
WE WENT BACK AND FORTH WITH CONDITIONS AND COMMENTS THAT WERE CLEARED PREVIOUSLY BY SEPTEMBER 19TH.
THIS HAS BEEN FORWARDED TO YOU BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE 6-0 VOTE AS WELL.
DO HAVE THE NO OBJECTION LETTER FROM THE CD ENGINEER, AND IT'S BEEN RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SECTION SEVEN OF WINDROSE SCREEN.
>> PRELIMINARY PLAT WINDROSE GREEN, SECTION 7.
[00:25:01]
>> MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH, SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS FOR APPROVAL.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
[11. Discussion and possible action to approve a Preliminary Subdivision Plat for Windrose Green Section 8.]
DISCUSSION ON POSSIBLE ACTION TO APPROVE A PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 8.>> THANK YOU, MARY AND COUNSEL.
THIS WOULD COMPLETE THE LOT COUNT AS SHOWN EARLIER, 36 LOTS.
THESE ARE 50 FOOT LOTS IN SECTION 8.
PRELIMINARY PLAT DID GO BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION, AS NOTED EARLIER.
IT'S BEING RECOMMENDED TO YOU 6: 0 VOTE.
CITY ENGINEER HAS SUPPLIED THE LETTER OF NO OBJECTION, ALL OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLEARED AS OF SEPTEMBER 19TH.
THAT'S ALL THAT WE HAVE IN TERMS OF STAFF COMMENTS.
>> GO AHEAD. DO YOU HAVE A QUESTION?
>> YES, I DO HAVE A QUESTION. I SHOULD HAVE ASKED THIS QUESTION VERY FUR DISCUSSING SECTION 6.
ARE THERE ANY OUTSTANDING FEES THAT THE WINDROSE GREEN DEVELOPMENT PEOPLE OWE THE CITY FOR ANY PAST REVIEW LEGAL WORK, ANYTHING AT ALL THAT THEY OWE THE CITY.
>> YES, IN YOUR LAST MEETING, I GAVE YOU AN UPDATE.
THIS WAS ONE OF THE HIGHLIGHTED DEVELOPMENTS BECAUSE IT'S BASICALLY REVIEWING IN MOTION.
LEGAL IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON SOME ITEMS, CITY ENGINEER IS CURRENTLY WORKING ON SOME ITEMS. MEANING THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH THE PLAT REVIEWS.
YOU'LL HAVE SOME OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING FEES THAT BASICALLY ARE COLLECTED ON THE BACKSIDE BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
THAT HAPPENS WITH A DELAY OF 30 DAYS TO 45 DAYS.
ONCE WE CLEAR ALL OF THOSE, YES, WE WILL CATCH UP.
SOMETIMES WE ALSO GET MEETINGS, WHICH WERE RECENTLY REQUESTED AS A LAST WEEK OR SO WHERE WE'RE DEALING WITH THE FREEDOM PARK, ALL OF THE TREES DUE TO THE STORM KNOCKING DOWN TREES, AND THEN SATISFYING THE TREE ORDINANCE.
WE ARE WORKING ON HOLDING THEM TO THAT COUNT IN TERMS OF TREAT REPLACEMENTS AND ALL OF THAT.
SOME OF THAT REQUIRED LEGAL REVIEW AS WELL.
YOU'LL SEE THOSE ITEMS COMING TO YOU REAL SOON AS CLOSE OUT OF THE PROJECT.
ONCE THE APPLICANT COMPLIES WITH THE ORDINANCES, WE CLEAR ALL INVOICES, AND THEN WE'LL GIVE YOU AN UPDATE ON DEVELOPMENTS LIKE THIS ONE IN TERMS OF THE BALANCE SHEETS AND CLEARING ALL OF THE REVIEWS.
>> WELL, THESE ARE WE WERE LOOKING AT PRELIMINARY PLATS TONIGHT? THESE ARE THE FINAL HURDLE IS THE FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.
I WAS MAKE SURE WE GET ALL, YOU WANT TO CHECK IN HAND.
THAT'LL PROBABLY BE WHILE WE SAY NO IF WE SAY NO.
>> WE WILL REPORT TO YOU ANYTHING THAT OR NOT THAT'S NOT METING NEW ORDINANCES OR ANYTHING THAT'S OVERDUE OR DUE.
WE USUALLY SEND THOSE INVOICES OUT.
>> I'M NOT IMPLYING THAT THEY OWE US ANY MONEY.
I'M JUST SAYING WE'VE HAD SOME RECENT DISCUSSIONS ABOUT OTHER DEVELOPERS THAT HAVE BEEN IN ARREARS, AND WE'RE NOT THE BANK OF THE CITY OF LATON.
WE'RE JUST WE'RE THE CITY OF LATON.
>> THE THING WITH THAT IS WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO HOLD UP ANY PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS, AND WE DO HAVE OTHER ENFORCEMENT ABILITY TO MAKE SURE OUR FEES ARE PAID.
>> I HAVE A QUESTION AND THIS MAYBE FOR TRUTH, MAYBE YOU KNOW THE ANSWER.
>> SPECIFICALLY, SECTION THREE, WHERE ALL THOSE 40 FOOT LOTS.
IS THERE THIS KIND OF GOES TO JOHN'S QUESTION EARLIER AS WELL.
DO WE HAVE ANY REGULATORY AUTHORITY?
>> ARE WE IN CHARGE OF THE STREETS, OR IS THE COUNTY?
>> IN THE ETJ, PURSUANT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT, YOU MAY HAVE SOME RESPONSIBILITY.
I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE AGREEMENT SAYS ON STREETS, BUT THEY HAVE A MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT.
THE M.U.D IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.
>> WHAT I'M GETTING AT IS MR. BOOTH RAISED THIS ISSUE BEFORE.
BUT ONE THING THAT WE CONSIDER DOING, OR MAY NEED TO START CONSIDER DOING TO DEAL WITH WHAT'S GOING TO EVENTUALLY, AS COUNCIL MEMBER SARTIN TALKED ABOUT, IS THE CROWDING ISSUE, DOING ENFORCEMENT OF ONLY ALLOWING PARKING ON THE STREET ON ONE SIDE OF THE ROAD.
I WANT TO KNOW IF THE CITY HAS THE ABILITY TO SET THOSE PARAMETERS LIKE WE COULD, IN, SAY, OTHER SUBDIVISIONS IN OUR VICINITY.
>> THAT'S A SHAME. THAT'S GOING TO BE BAD.
>> ESPECIALLY THAT FURTHER SOUTH PIECE.
>> BUT THERE'S A M.U.D WITH AN ATTORNEY, AND THERE WILL BE AN HOA.
[00:30:01]
THERE ARE METHODS TO GET THE MESSAGE ACROSS UNLIKE SOME OF OUR OTHER DEVELOPMENTS THAT DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE AN HOA.>> BUT FROM OTHER SUBDIVISIONS, AND I KNOW THIS IS LIKELY GOING TO BE PEOPLE HEARING THE SAME.
>> YOU HAVE ALMOST 650 HOUSES RIGHT HERE, AND ONE ROAD COMING OFF HENDERSON WITH 11 OR 12 HOUSES THAT ARE GOING TO FRONT THAT STREET WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PARK ON THE ROAD, AND YOU'RE GOING TO BLOCK ALL ACCESS FROM THIS PARK.
I SEE IT IN HOUSTON ALL THE TIME.
>> I'M REALLY SURPRISED IT'S NOT A BOULEVARD.
>> THERE'S A LOT IF WE COULD GO BACK AND DO THINGS DIFFERENTLY ON THIS ONE FOR SURE.
>> ESPECIALLY AT THE ENTRANCE.
>> YEAH. A QUESTION I HAVE FOR THE DEVELOPERS, IS THERE ANY PLANS TO GROW THIS DEVELOPMENT?
>> BECAUSE YOU WERE TALKING AT ONE POINT ABOUT SOME PROPERTY OFF ON THE EAST SIDE AND I WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THAT.
>> I HAVE TO ADD HERE THAT THE FORMER MANAGEMENT AGREED TO A LIST OF VARIANCES, AND THAT'S IN THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT TOO.
IF YOU WANT TO ADD YOUR LIST OF "LET'S NOT DO THAT AGAIN", I WOULD DEFINITELY SAY LET'S NOT DO THAT AGAIN.
>> THAT ONE DEFINITELY. WE MIGHT HAVE TO WORK WITH THE HOA IN THE FUTURE ON MAYBE STOPPING THAT ONE BECAUSE THAT'S GOING TO BE A PROBLEM, I THINK.
WE HELD ANOTHER DEVELOPER TO THE FIRE ON THIS ONE TOO BEFORE APPROVAL, AND IT WAS ALL AMENITIES BECAUSE WE HAD RESIDENTS, AND THOSE DEVELOPMENTS COME IN AND COMPLAIN.
HAVE YOU PUT ALL YOUR AMENITIES IN THAT YOU SAID YOU WERE GOING TO PUT IN, ACCORDING TO THE SECTIONS?
>> WE'VE AT LEAST STARTED CONSTRUCTION.
PHASE 2 STILL ISN'T FINISHED YET.
THERE'S A POCKET PARK IN SECTION 3.
WE TACKED ON THE SIDEWALK TO THE SCHOOL BECAUSE OF SAFETY CONCERNS THAT CAME OUT OF THE LAST HOA ANNUAL MEETING.
WE HEARD PEOPLE WERE WALKING DOWN 523.
THE MAJORITY OF THE AMENITIES WERE PUT IN WITH PHASE 1: THE PAVILION, THE LAKES, AND THAT PLAYGROUND POCKET PARK.
>> ALL WALKING TRAILS, AND WHAT ELSE? YOU SAID PAVILION.
EVERYTHING ELSE HAS BEEN PUT IN ACCORDINGLY.
>> IT'S SUPPOSED TO HAVE FINISHED BY THE END OF THIS MONTH.
>> WE HAD A COUNCIL CHAMBER FULL ONE TIME BEFORE, SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE I ASK YOU THAT SAME QUESTION. COUNSEL.
>> MOVE TO APPROVE [INAUDIBLE] SECTION 8.
>> MOTION BY COUNCIL MEMBER BOOTH.
SECOND BY COUNCIL MEMBER ROBERTS FOR APPROVAL.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ITEM NUMBER 12, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTIONS TO APPROVE RESOLUTION
[12. Discussion and possible action to approve Resolution No. 20241008-012 nominating candidate(s) for a position on the Board of Directors of the Brazoria County Appraisal District.]
NUMBER 20241008-012 NOMINATING CANDIDATES FOR POSITION ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MISSOURI COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT.>> THOSE TWO APPLICATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED TO BE NOMINATED, WHICH WAS SUSAN SPORE AND ANGELA WILLIAMS. YOU CAN VOTE TO ADD THOSE TWO AS NOMINEES.
THEN IN DECEMBER WE'LL COME BACK WITH THE BALLOT, AND THE CITY GETS 45 VOTES, AND YOU COULD USE THE 45 VOTES TOWARDS ONE OF THEM, OR YOU CAN SPLIT THEM HOWEVER YOU LIKE TO USE THOSE 45 VOTES IN DECEMBER.
>> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO NOMINATE SUSAN SPORE SINGULARLY.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SARTIN, AND A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS FOR NOMINATING SUSAN SPORE AS A LONE CANDIDATE.
[00:35:07]
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
MOTION CARRIES. COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
[COMMUNICATIONS FROM MAYOR AND COUNCIL]
I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND OTHERS THAT ASSISTED AND HELPED WITH THE MARSHALL HIGH DEDICATION ON SATURDAY.IT WAS VERY WELL RECEIVED BY THE PUBLIC AND THERE'S A LOT OF GOOD FEELINGS FROM THAT MEETING.
I WANT TO SAY THANK YOU TO EVERYONE WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THAT.
>> I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT THE FINAL SUITE FOR THE DEBRIS REMOVER, BUT I CANNOT THINK OF THE DATE.
>> IF YOU'RE NOT SIGNED UP FOR THE AUTOMATED TEXTING AND PHONE CALLS, PLEASE DO SO BY GOING ONTO OUR CITY WEBSITE SO THAT YOU CAN GET THOSE NOTIFICATIONS.
>> MY ONLY QUESTION IS ABOUT THE AGENDA.
WE WERE ASKED TO FILL OUT A REVIEW FOR THE CITY MANAGER.
I THOUGHT WE'D HAVE HAD THAT DONE BY NOW.
I'M SURPRISED THAT WASN'T ADDED TO THIS AGENDA, ESPECIALLY SINCE WE DON'T HAVE THAT MANY ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT.
THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN A PERFECT OPPORTUNITY.
I UNDERSTOOD NOT HAVING IT LAST TIME BECAUSE WE KNEW IT WAS GOING TO BE A LONG AGENDA, BUT THIS ONE WAS CLEARLY GOING TO BE A SHORTER AGENDA.
NOW WE'RE PROBABLY GOING TO HAVE IT PUSHED TO A MUCH LONGER AGENDA.
IT JUST SEEMS NOT WELL PLANNED.
>> THE ORIGINAL PROTOCOL WAS I WAS SUPPOSED TO HAVE EVALUATIONS ON MY ANNIVERSARY MONTH, WHICH WAS JULY.
THEN THERE WAS DISCUSSION ABOUT WHEN YOU HAVE NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBERS, THERE'S NOT THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO A SUFFICIENT EVALUATION BECAUSE IT'S TWO MONTHS AND TWO MEETINGS, OR THREE MEETINGS, OR SOMETHING.
THE PROTOCOL THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS WAS NOVEMBER.
>> I'M SORRY FOR THE CONFUSION BECAUSE WE WERE ASKED AND REQUESTED TO HAVE IT BACK IN A TIMELY FASHION, I THINK IN AUGUST.
IT MADE ME BELIEVE WE WOULD BE DISCUSSING IT IN SEPTEMBER, NOT PUSHING IT OFF FOR THREE MONTHS.
>> THAT'S MY FAULT BECAUSE, AGAIN, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT I WAS GOING TO HAVE AN EVALUATION LAST NOVEMBER, WHICH I DIDN'T, I WAS CURIOUS AS TO WHY I DIDN'T HAVE AN EVALUATION.
I ASKED TO HAVE AN EVALUATION IN A TIMELY MANNER.
HOWEVER, AT THIS POINT, I MIGHT AS WELL WAIT AND IT'LL BE TWO YEARS IN NOVEMBER.
WITH ALL THE OTHER BUDGET STUFF GOING ON IN SIX HOUR MEETINGS I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS PRUDENT TO ASK FOR AN EVALUATION AND ADD TIME TO AN ALREADY LENGTHY MEETING.
>> THAT'S WHY I WAS REFERENCING THIS.
WHEN I GOT THIS AGENDA THAT'S WHY I WAS SAYING I WAS SURPRISED BECAUSE I COULD TELL FROM READING THIS AGENDA IT WOULD NOT BE NEARLY AS LENGTHY.
IT'S ONE MEETING IN NOVEMBER, WHICH MEANS IT'S PROBABLY GOING TO BE A PACKED AGENDA, AND IT COULD BE A LONG NIGHT.
>> WE CAN [INAUDIBLE] [LAUGHTER]
>> WE CAN PUSH OFF THE EVALUATION TO ANOTHER MONTH.
IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE NOVEMBER.
>> WE CAN SEE IF THERE'S AVAILABILITY AT THE END OF OCTOBER.
WAIT. WE CAN'T DO THAT ONE. NEVER MIND. I DIDN'T SUGGEST THAT.
>> I DON'T LIKE THE IDEA. WE'VE ALREADY GONE ONE FULL YEAR, NOW WE'RE GOING TWO FULL YEARS, AND THEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT PUSHING IT EVEN FURTHER?
>> WE'VE FILLED OUT OUR REVIEWS SO IT'S JUST GOING TO BE.
>> ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING?
>> COUNCILMAN SARTIN ALLUDED TO IT, AND I WAS GOING TO ECHO THE FACT THAT THERE ARE SOME READY BUILDINGS NOT TOO FAR FROM CITY COUNCIL TEAM.
THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY READY FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS.
WHOEVER NEEDS TO GET OFF HIGH CENTER NEEDS TO GET OFF HIGH CENTER.
[00:40:02]
IT'S NOT A VERY TASTEFUL THING TO HAVE TO GO APPROACH THESE DERELICT LANDLORDS, BUT UNTIL SOMETHING GETS DONE IT'S GOING TO SIT THERE AND BE A RACCOON NEST AND [INAUDIBLE]>> WITH THAT, I FEEL IF WE'RE NOT DOING SOMETHING ABOUT THAT WE'RE SPEAKING OUT OF BOTH SIDES OF OUR MOUTH WHEN WE'RE COMPLAINING ABOUT THAT 40 [INAUDIBLE] [LAUGHTER]
>> IF YOU NEED AN ADDRESS I FOUND ONE FOR YOU PRETTY QUICK.
[OVERLAPPING] WALKING DOWN THE STREET AND SHOW YOU ITS PAINT COLOR.
>> [LAUGHTER] CARL, I THINK YOU KNOW WHICH ONE HE'S TALKING ABOUT.
>> THAT AND THE GARAGE APARTMENT THAT SITS RIGHT BEHIND IT.
>> WE'RE GOING TO COME TO YOU [INAUDIBLE]
[EXECUTIVE SESSION]
>> ALL RIGHT. COUNSEL IS GOING TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
THE CITY COUNCIL WILL HOLD EXECUTIVE SESSION PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 551 TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AUTHORITY CONTAINED THEREIN.
ITEM NUMBER 13, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION TO DELIBERATE THE APPOINTMENT, EMPLOYMENT, EVALUATION, REASSIGNMENT, DUTIES, DISCIPLINE, OR DISMISSAL OF A PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.074 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, TALKING ABOUT BOARD COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS, REAPPOINTMENTS, TABLE 92424.
COUNSEL WILL ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:41 AND 40 SECONDS.
ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GOING TO COME BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION AT 7:15 P.M.
[OPEN SESSION]
COUNSEL, DO I HAVE AN ACTION COMING OUT OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION?>> I'M GOING TO ABSTAIN FROM THIS VOTE.
>> HERE'S A MOTION FOR THE FOLLOWING 2024 BOARDS AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS OR REAPPOINTMENTS.
FOR ABLC, DR. WILLIAM JACKSON, JOHNNY VOSS, AND GARY DICKEY.
FOR ANIMAL SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE, JANIE STEWART SHAW.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, DANIEL GRAHAM, MICHELLE TOWNSEND.
KEEP ANGLETON BEAUTIFUL COMMISSION, CHARLES SCARBOROUGH, ANDREA [INAUDIBLE] COATES, TRACY DELASANDRI.
FOR PARKS AND RECREATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ERIN [INAUDIBLE] DAVID HEINICKE, GUADALUPE MORALES, AND CLARA DANHOUSE.
FOR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, BILL GARWOOD, DEBORAH SPORE, ANDREW HESTON, AND JEFF ROBERSON.
FROM SENIOR CITIZEN COMMISSION, ARCHIE MILAM, SARAH MCDANIEL, PAT [INAUDIBLE] SHERRY PHILLIPS, AND JANIE SCHWARTZ SHAW.
>> I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN BOOTH.
I HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILMAN ROBERTS FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF THE CANDIDATES LISTED.
ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.
>> ALL THOSE OPPOSED, SAME SIGN.
>> MOTION CARRIES. THAT WILL LEAD US TO THE END OF OUR COUNCIL MEETING, AND WE WILL ADJOURN AT 7:17 AND TWO SECONDS.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.