[2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on a request for approval of an ordinance rezoning approximately 1.193 acres from the Single Family Residential 7.2 Zoning District to a Manufactured Home (MH) District, at 1030 S. Anderson St., Angleton, TX, for the Blackmon Manufactured Home Community Expansion (6 lots). ]

REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.193 ACRES FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7.2 ZONING DISTRICT TO A MANUFACTURED HOME DISTRICT AT 1030 SOUTH ANDERSON STREET ANGLETON, TEXAS. THE BLACKMON MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY EXPANSION SIX LOTS.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS . AS STATED, THIS IS A REZONING PETITION FROM THE SINGLE FAMILY 7.2 DISTRICT TO THE MH MOBILE HOME COMMUNITY DISTRICT.

THIS IS AN EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK BLACKMON OFF OF MAXIE LANE, OF COURSE, OFF OF ALSO THE ANDERSON STREET BOUNDS, THAT PARTICULAR PRIVATE DRIVE AND ALSO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

AND THEN RIGHT ABOVE ITS DWYER STREET, WHICH IS ONE OF THE ACCESS POINTS AS IT GOES TO THE WEST.

IT DOES HAVE A MAJOR ENTRANCE INTO THE PARK. I HAVE GIVEN YOU THE STAFF REPORT, AND HOPEFULLY YOU HAD A CHANCE TO LOOK AT WHAT WE PRESENTED IN TERMS OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE REQUEST, WE GAVE YOU THE SURROUNDING CONDITIONS, AND IF YOU WOULD ROLL DOWN, YOU WOULD SEE THE EXISTING ZONING MAP, WHICH THE MOBILE HOME COMMUNITY WOULD BE THE LARGE AREA IN THE ORANGE SHADE AND THE CIRCLE THERE WOULD BE THE EXPANSION AREA IN QUESTION.

WE PRESENTED THIS THROUGH TO THE NEWSPAPER IN TERMS OF THE PUBLIC ADVERTISEMENT, AND NOTIFIED EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPERTY OF THE PETITION PER THE REQUIREMENTS. I ALSO WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT SINCE AGENDA POSTING, I HAVE PLACED A CONCEPT PLAN RIGHT BEFORE YOU IN WHICH THEY HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT THE ACREAGE TO MAKE SURE THAT THE SIX UNITS WOULD FIT ON THE PROPERTY.

BUT WE WERE NOT OF THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY WOULD RETAIN THE SINGLE FAMILY LOT WHICH WOULD FRONT ON ANDERSON.

THERE IS A HOUSE, AND WE'LL LOOK AT THE PHOTOGRAPHS JUST A LITTLE LATER FOR YOU TO GET A LOOK AT WHAT THAT WOULD BE.

SO THAT BEING SAID, THAT WAS NEW INFORMATION I THOUGHT WAS REAL HELPFUL TO THE CONVERSATION AS WE MOVE FORWARD.

I'LL BE ABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT.

THE SITE IS 1.193 ACRES AS PRESENTED IN THE PETITION.

BUT HOWEVER, AS WE STATED IN THE STAFF REPORT, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO SCALE IT BACK.

OUR SUGGESTION FROM STAFF WOULD BE POSSIBLY TO KEEP THE SINGLE FAMILY TRACK SINGLE FAMILY AND JUST ZONE WHAT'S NEEDED FOR THE SIX LOTS THAT'S SHOWN ON YOUR EXHIBIT, WHICH WOULD BE THE CONCEPT PLAN.

IF ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO SEE A COPY OF THAT NEW CONCEPT PLAN, I HAVE A COUPLE COPIES HERE FOR YOUR REFERENCE.

BUT I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT INFORMATION AS WE DISCUSS THIS TODAY.

THE COMMISSION ALSO WAS PRESENTED A NUMBER OF ISSUES THAT TURNED INTO CONDITIONS.

I THINK THOSE BULLET POINTS WOULD CONSIDER LIMITING HIM TO SIX UNITS IN TERMS OF THE EXPANSION, AND ALSO DEAL WITH ANY CONCERNS IN TERMS OF RETAINING THAT RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER ALONG THE ANDERSON STREET AREA, WHERE YOU SEE A LOT OF THE SINGLE FAMILY STOCK.

THAT WOULD GIVE YOU AN OPPORTUNITY TO DEAL WITH, AS I JUST DISCUSSED, THAT THAT ITEM.

WE FORWARDED THIS TO THE FIRE CHIEF. THERE IS AN ISSUE IN TERMS OF THE FIRE HYDRANT.

I PRESENTED A MAP THAT WOULD GIVE YOU ALL OF THE RADIUSES OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS BEING LOCATED 300FT OF ANY UNIT.

THAT WAS A GAP. SO WE MADE THE APPLICANT AWARE THAT IT MIGHT BE A NEED TO ADD ANOTHER FIRE HYDRANT ON THE PRIVATE SIDE, AND THAT SHOULD BE NO ISSUE. ALSO, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT IS NOT REQUIRING THEM TO EXPAND THE DRIVE TO 18FT, BUT HOWEVER, KEEP THE SAME WIDTH BUT RESURFACED EXISTING DRIVEWAY THAT WOULD BE ADEQUATELY ENOUGH TO.

SUPPORT ANY FIRE EQUIPMENT THAT HAD TO ENTER THE SITE.

[00:05:01]

ONE OTHER MANEUVER COULD BE TO DEAL WITH ANY ACCESS ISSUES, MAYBE MAKE IT ONE WAY, AND POSTED NO PARKING WITHIN THAT AREA BECAUSE THEY WANT TO KEEP IT FREE AND CLEAR. OTHER THAN THAT, THE APPLICANT HAS TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS IN TERMS OF ON SITE DRIVEWAY PARKING, IN TERMS OF THE SPACES THAT YOU HAVE TO ACCOMMODATE NOT ONLY THE RESIDENTS IN THE COURSE OF VISITOR, SO I MENTIONED THAT IN THE STAFF REPORT. OTHER BULLET POINT WOULD BE, AS I STATED, RESURFACING MAXIE LANE.

THERE IS A SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT, TYPICALLY ALONG PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAYS, BUT THE APPLICANT DOES HAVE THE DISCRETION DURING THE PLANNING PROCESS TO REQUEST THE VARIANCE THROUGH THE CITY COUNCIL. AND THEN LASTLY WOULD BE THE PARKLAND DEDICATION.

WE WENT OVER THIS WITHIN THE PREDEVELOPMENT MEETING, IN WHICH THEY ARE REQUIRED TO EITHER DO FEE IN LIEU OF CONTRIBUTION IN TERMS OF THE PARK LAND REQUIREMENT PER HOME. SO THAT IS ALSO AN ISSUE THAT WE CAN DISCUSS ON TODAY.

SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD CONSIDER APPROVAL WITH THOSE CONDITIONS.

AS WE KNOW THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. SO WE'LL MOVE TO THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND THEN FROM THERE I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.

THANK YOU, MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION. AND A SECOND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN.

AND IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT ON BEHALF OF OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, NOW IS YOUR TIME TO COME TO THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND TELL US YOUR THOUGHTS.

TRY TO LIMIT COMMENTS TO NO MORE THAN THREE MINUTES.

GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. YES, SIR. HOW YOU DOING? MANUEL GONZALEZ 58 PINE COURT, LAKE JACKSON. AND I'M THE APPLICANT FOR THIS PROJECT THIS DEVELOPMENT.

AND JUST IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS, I'M HERE. OKAY.

WELL, TYPICALLY. AND THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.

YES. WE DON'T TYPICALLY HAVE QUESTION AND ANSWER DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING PORTION.

WE MAY AND PROBABLY WILL WHEN WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE AND BEING AVAILABLE TO US.

OKAY. THANK YOU SIR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. IS THERE AND OBVIOUSLY YOU'RE IN FAVOR OF THE PROJECT.

IS IT YOUR PROJECT? 110%. OKAY. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. I HAVE A MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY MISS SPOOR.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT.

WHAT QUESTIONS DO YOU HAVE REGARDING THIS PROPOSAL? OTIS WHO WOULD BEAR THE COST OF THE FIRE HYDRANT.

IF THE FIRE CHIEF DECIDES THAT ONE NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED, IS THAT GOING TO BE ON THE APPLICANT, OR IS THAT. IT SHOULD BE THE DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE? OKAY, SO IT'S A DEVELOPER EXPENSE, NOT FOR THE CITY.

RIGHT. OKAY. AND THEN IT WOULD PROBABLY BE ON THE PRIVATE SIDE.

THEY HAD TO INSTALL ONE OTHER ALONE. THE OTHER MAXIE THAT LIFTS OFF OF DWYER.

THAT'S ALSO A PRIVATE HYDRANT. WHO WOULD BE ENFORCING THE ONE WAY AND ONE WAY TRAFFIC AND NO PARKING RULES IF THIS IS ON A PRIVATE DRIVE? I JUST THINK THAT IS A TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ISSUE, THAT THE MANAGEMENT SHOULD MAKE SURE THE RESIDENTS ABIDING BY. IT'S NOT LIKE POLICE WOULD GIVE ANYBODY A TICKET, BUT I THINK IT'S A SAFETY ISSUE.

RIGHT. THEN THAT'S MY CONCERN BECAUSE HE'S DOWN IN LAKE JACKSON WHO'S GOING TO BE UP THERE MAKING SURE, ESPECIALLY WHEN I KNOW WE REQUIRE A CERTAIN NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS.

BUT I'LL TELL YOU, PEOPLE HAVE WAY MORE CARS THAN WE ACCOUNT FOR.

I WOULD BE KIND OF CONCERNED ABOUT THE ESPECIALLY WITH THE DENSITY OF THIS HOUSING.

ABOUT JUST KIND OF LEAVING THAT TO, HEY PRIVATE DRIVE MANAGED BY PRIVATE BUSINESS.

LET'S RETAIN THAT QUESTION TO THE APPLICANT. MAYBE THEY CAN PRESENT A MANAGEMENT PLAN AND THEN ALSO DISCUSS THAT WITH YOU IN TERMS OF HOW THEY WOULD ENFORCE THAT UPON THEIR DO THEY HAVE AN ASSOCIATION, FOR EXAMPLE? I KNOW HE IS A NEW OWNER AND HE'S DONE SOME IMPROVEMENTS, BUT HE CAN TALK MORE ABOUT THAT. OKAY. THANK YOU.

BUT GOOD QUESTION. THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY QUESTION THAT I THINK THAT DOVETAILS WITH YOUR COMMENT IS, IS THERE SOME SORT OF HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION OR SOME SORT OF GOVERNING BODY OVER.

THIS IS CHARACTERIZED AS AN EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING KIND OF COMMUNITY.

IS THERE ONE IN PLACE? IS THERE A PLAN FOR ONE TO BE PUT IN PLACE? IF NOT? KIND OF FOR THOSE REASONS. AND ALSO, IS THIS A KIND OF BOUNCING OFF THAT IS THIS JUST A COMMUNITY, OR IS THIS AN OVERALL RENTAL PARK WITH A CENTRAL? RIGHT NOW IT'S ACTING AS A RENTAL PARK. WE DO HAVE SOME THAT ARE ACTUALLY LEASE UNITS.

AND I DO KNOW THERE MAY BE SOME OTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STYLE OF YOU KNOW, PURCHASE,

[00:10:04]

LEASE. THOSE KIND OF QUESTIONS I THINK CAN BE FILTERED TO THE APPLICANT.

AND MAYBE WE CAN GET ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

BUT I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE KNOW THAT THE OTHER THING WOULD BE THE FIRE LANE.

THAT TYPE OF NO PARKING SIGN COULD BE ENFORCED BY A FIRE MARSHAL FIRE INSPECTOR, IF THEY SEE THAT THAT'S A REPEATED, YOU KNOW, OFFENSE, BECAUSE THEY SHOULD KEEP THAT AREA CLEAR BECAUSE OF THE FIRE SAFETY.

AND THAT WOULD BE LIKE AT ANY WALMART OR ANY PLACE THAT HAD A FIRE LANE.

SO THIS IS KIND OF TUCKED AWAY BACK IN THERE.

YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE THE WALMART PEOPLE SEE IT AND CALL THE COPS.

YOU CALL THE COPS ON YOUR NEIGHBORS, RIGHT? YEAH.

SO THOSE ARE GOOD QUESTIONS, BUT ANYTIME SURE I WOULD LIKE TO BRING THE APPLICANT UP TO ANSWER SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS, I THINK IT WOULD BE ADEQUATE. MR. GONZALEZ, WOULD YOU LIKE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS, PLEASE? THANK YOU, THANK YOU. YES. AS FAR AS THE HOA, THERE AIN'T NO HOA THERE.

YOU KNOW, AND ALSO THE PARK IS TOO SMALL TO HAVE A FULL TIME MANAGER.

OKAY. YOU KNOW, AND I CONDUCT BUSINESS. I HAVE ANOTHER BUSINESS IN LAKE JACKSON.

SO IN ANGLETON, I MEAN, SO I'M ALWAYS, YOU KNOW, IN AND OUT.

SO I'M PASSING BY THERE QUITE OFTEN TO CHECK THAT OUT.

AND FOR THAT ONE WAY, WHO'S GOING TO MONITOR THAT? YOU KNOW, I HAD DEVELOPED MAYBE FOUR LOTS, MAYBE A YEAR AND A HALF AGO.

AND THAT WAS ALREADY IN MY MIND. AND YOU SEE THE DRIVEWAY, IT KIND OF HAS IT WHERE [INAUDIBLE] I WAS GOING TO MAKE IT, WHERE THEY COME FROM, ANDERSON, YOU KNOW, GOING ONE WAY AND YOU CAN SEE RIGHT NOW, IF YOU GO CHECK, YOU'LL SEE THAT THE DRIVEWAYS, THEY HAVE LIKE A LITTLE LOOP TO BE ABLE TO COME IN.

SO THAT WAS ALREADY SOMETHING THAT I WAS GOING TO, BUT GOING BACK AGAIN TO WHO'S GOING TO MONITOR THAT? I MEAN, IT'S YOU KNOW, THAT'S A HARD ONE TO LIKE YOU SAID.

I MEAN, IT'S JUST, YOU KNOW, FOR MY EXPERIENCE, YOU JUST SET THE RULES.

AND FOR MOST, YOU KNOW, MOST OF THE TIME THEY FOLLOW IT.

AND THIS IS A MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY WHERE, YOU KNOW, I OWN THE LAND, AND THEY YOU KNOW, THE MOBILE HOME, THE NEW ONES THAT THEY BROUGHT IN.

I THINK, LIKE I SAID, THEY OWNED THE HOMES, THEY BUY THEM, THEY GET THEM FINANCED AND THEY AVERAGE AROUND PRICE MAYBE 60, 60 TO 80,000. YOU KNOW, SO LIKE I SAID, THEY PAY ME A RENTAL TO BE ABLE TO PARK THEM THERE.

SO THAT'S THE WAY IT WORKS. HOW OFTEN DO YOU MOVE DO THE HOMES END UP MOVING ON OR OFF THE PROPERTY? I BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY MAYBE 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO.

AND YOU KNOW, I'VE ONLY EXPERIENCED THEM MOVING IN FROM THEM.

YOU KNOW, BECAUSE WE BUILD A FORCE BASE BEFORE THEY MOVE THEM IN.

SO IT'S NOT A BIG THING BECAUSE IT COSTS 3 TO 4 OR $5,000 TO DO A 70 FOOT, YOU KNOW, MOBILE HOME.

SO THEY DON'T MOVE THAT MUCH. AND THAT GOES TO THE EFFECT OF BEING ABLE TO ENFORCE THE RULES BECAUSE THEY KNOW THAT, HEY, YOU KNOW, THEY TAKE PRIDE OF OWNERSHIP. HEY, YOU PAY 60, $80,000 FOR THE HOME.

WE MOVED IT TO A PARK IN THE COMMUNITY WHERE WE LIKE.

AND THE RULES THAT I SAID, YOU KNOW, THEY FOLLOW THEM BECAUSE IT'S THE SAME THING.

LIKE THEY JUST CAN'T NOT FOLLOW THE RULES AND THEN GET EVICTED.

AND NOW THEY'RE ON THE HOOK FOR $5,000 OR WHATEVER TO MOVE IT TO ANOTHER COMMUNITY WHERE THEY WANT TO LIVE IN THIS COMMUNITY, YOU KNOW, SO I DON'T I DON'T THINK I'D HAVE AN ISSUE ENFORCING THE ONE WAY RULE.

DID YOU SAY YOU JUST PURCHASED THIS? THIS IS NOT YOUR ORIGINAL SUBDIVISION BECAUSE THIS IS NOT A VERY EYE APPEALING SITUATION FOR ANGLETON TEXAS.

THERE'S A LOT OF NEW CONSTRUCTION GOING ON ACROSS THE STREET. AND THIS TO ME IS IF IT WASN'T SO HIDDEN BACK IN THERE, I'D BE THROWING A FUSS. AS A REALTOR AND AS A HOMEOWNER, MY CONCERN IS THAT THE UNITS THAT ARE BACK THERE, IF YOU TAKE A BUNCH OF PICTURES, THOSE UNITS, THEY'RE EITHER THEY'RE SHOULD BE TORN DOWN.

THERE ARE NO TRESPASSING SIGNS. THEY'RE VACANT.

THEY'RE ROOF LEAKS. MY CONCERN ABOUT ADDING A BUNCH MORE TO IT, WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO, AND I, I THE ENTREPRENEURIAL PART OF YOU I COMMEND.

BUT THESE UNITS ARE NOT OWNED. THE PEOPLE THAT OWN THESE UNITS ARE NOT LIVING IN THEM BECAUSE THEY PROBABLY ARE NOT.

THEY PROBABLY LEASING THEM OUT TO A BUNCH OF PEOPLE GETTING 2 OR 3 FAMILIES IN A TWO BEDROOM, ONE BATH, AND THEY'RE JUST PEOPLE WALKING AROUND.

AND IF WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING PEOPLE THAT MOVE THE UNITS IN WILL STAY IN THEM THEMSELVES, THAT'S ONE THING.

BUT JUST SOMEBODY TO PAY 9000 BUCKS AND RENT IT OUT FOR THE NEXT THREE YEARS, BECAUSE THIS IS NOT ATTRACTIVE.

WE CAN MAKE THE STREET LOOK BETTER, BUT WE NEED SOME ASSURANCES FROM YOU THAT THE STUFF THAT OUT HERE THAT'S PROBABLY SHOULD BE CONDEMNED.

YOU NEED TO GET THOSE THINGS OUT OF THERE, DUDE. MY PERSONAL OPINION, AND I UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERN.

AND LIKE I SAID TO THAT IS WE ALL START SOMEWHERE.

YOU KNOW, WE ALL START SOMEWHERE. MAYBE YOU PERSONALLY WOULDN'T LIVE THERE.

AND MAYBE, YOU KNOW, I WILL PROBABLY LIVE THERE.

YOU KNOW, AND IT'S A SAFE PLACE. YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID, WE ALL COME FROM DIFFERENT STAGES IN LIFE, YOU KNOW. YOU KNOW, AND SO, YOU KNOW, FOR ME TO TELL SOMEBODY THAT'S BEEN LIVING SOMEWHERE FOR 20 YEARS,

[00:15:03]

THERE'S ACTUALLY, YOU KNOW, A [INAUDIBLE] THEY'VE BEEN THERE 40 YEARS.

I'M OKAY WITH THAT. I'M JUST CONCERNED WITH THE VACANT UNITS.

OKAY. THAT'S ALL I'M CONCERNED WITH. THERE'S NO VACANT UNITS IN THE PARK AS WE SPEAK. OKAY.

AND SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST IT'S NOT MY JOB TO TELL, LIKE MISS [INAUDIBLE].

SHE'S BEEN THERE. HER HUSBAND, 40 SOMETHING YEARS. HEY, YOU'RE WE HAVE SOME NEW ONES ACROSS THE STREET. LET ME EVICT, BECAUSE THAT'S JUST NOT THE WAY THAT I.

LIKE I SAID, WE ALL HAVE DIFFERENT, YOU KNOW, BACKGROUNDS AND STUFF THAT WE COME FROM.

IT'S JUST NOT MY YOU KNOW, FOR THEM NOT TO SAY I MAYBE WOULDN'T LIVE THERE IN HER HOUSE, BUT.

WELL, I'M NOT AS WORRIED ABOUT THAT. BUT THE UNITS THAT YOU'RE PROPOSING TO MOVE IN, ARE THOSE GOING TO BE ONES THAT ARE GOING TO BE OWNED BY. ARE THEY GOING TO BE NEW UNITS? SOMEBODY'S GOING TO LEASE IT OUT. BY THE CITY ORDINANCE.

THEY HAVE TO BE A CERTAIN YEARS OLD, I THINK FROM 99 AND ABOVE.

THEY HAVE TO BE ONE STORY, TWO, THEY HAVE TO BE STRAPPED DOWN TO, YOU KNOW, FOR THE HURRICANES THEY HAVE TO BE IN GOOD CONDITION, YOU KNOW, EVEN IF IT'S A 99. BUT IT LOOKS LIKE TRASH.

WELL, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO APPROVE IT, YOU KNOW? AND AS YOU CAN SEE, I MEAN, THE FOUR ONES THAT I MOVED IN, THEY'RE IN DECENT CONDITION AND GOING BACK AGAIN, WE'RE ALL.

MAYBE YOU WOULDN'T LIVE THERE. MAYBE I WOULD, YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN? SO IT'S JUST ONE OF THOSE THINGS AND GOING BACK TO THE TO THE DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE STREET.

I MEAN, I'M IN THE PROCESS ALMOST UNDER CONTRACT TO GET THE LAND ACROSS, YOU KNOW, TO BUY IN.

I'M A HOME BUILDER MYSELF. YOU KNOW, I BUILT HOMES IN FREEPORT AREA AND THAT'S MY PLAN TO BUILD MAYBE FIVE HOMES.

YOU KNOW, THERE'S TWO OF THEM THERE NOW. THANK.

THANK YOU, MR. GONZALES. I THINK WE'RE GETTING A LITTLE AHEAD OF OURSELVES HERE. DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. GONZALES? I DO WHEN YOU SAY ACROSS THE STREET, ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT ACROSS ANDERSON? ACROSS ANDERSON.

THEY'RE BUILDING THE NEW HOUSES, RIGHT? RIGHT.

SO? SO WHAT? I'M NOT SEEING REALLY ANY VACANT LOTS ACROSS THE STREET.

ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT MR. WEAVER'S LOTS? YES, THEY'RE ABOUT, WHAT, 12 TO 18? LOTS THAT ARE OKAY. 60. I GOTCHA. COULD YOU POINT THEM OUT ON THE SCREEN FOR US, JUST SO WE CAN SEE ALL THAT ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE.

OKAY. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO THERE'S A COUPLE. CORRECT.

YEAH. THEY HAVE 2 OR 3 THAT HAVE NEW CONSTRUCTION.

THERE. YES. AND THERE'S A THERE'S A LOT THAT.

SHOW THE PHOTOGRAPH. THERE'S A HOUSE HERE. AND I'M ONLY PROPOSING TO THIS VACANT.

YES. IT'S VACANT. THIS IS A PRIVATE DRIVE. SO THIS HOUSE IS GOING TO STAY AFTER THE SATURDAY, THEY SOLD IT TO ME, BUT THEY STILL LIVE THERE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND FIX IT UP.

BUT FROM HERE BACK, YOU KNOW, I WAS THINKING ABOUT DOING THOSE SIX LOTS AND WHAT I WAS SAYING EARLIER ABOUT NEW CONSTRUCTION.

I PLAN ON BUYING I'M ALMOST HAVING THIS UNDER CONTRACT TO THIS IS THERE'S TWO HOUSES HERE AND THEY'RE GOING TO BURN DOWN TO BUILD RIGHT HERE MYSELF.

YOU KNOW, THERE ARE TWO AVAILABLE LOTS ON THAT SIDE. ON THAT SIDE OF THE STREET. SO WHERE SO YOUR PLAN FOR THESE, IS IT GOING TO HAVE ADEQUATE PARKING OR ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE VISITOR SPOTS.

AND IF YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE VISITOR SPOTS, WHERE ARE THOSE GOING TO GO.

IN THESE LAWNS THAT I'M PROPOSING THERE ARE GOING TO BE A 50 WIDE BY 135, 139 DEEP AND I MEAN, GOING BACK TO THE ANGLETON AREA IN FREEPORT THAT'S BUILT, YOU KNOW, ALMOST 2000 SQUARE FOOT HOUSES ON THOSE LOTS.

AND THEY'RE COMING HERE. YOU HAVE TEN, 15FT BETWEEN THE HOUSES.

BUT GOING BACK AGAIN FOR A MOBILE HOME, THAT'S A GOOD SPACE EVEN FOR A DOUBLE WIDE.

WELL, I GUESS MY QUESTION GOES MORE TOWARD VISITOR AND SUPPLEMENTAL PARKING.

ARE YOU PLANNING ON HAVING, I GUESS, MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPACES FOR EACH OF THESE SIX LOTS SO THAT YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE ADDITIONAL VISITOR OR SUPPLEMENTAL PARKING? WHAT'S THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH? WHAT'S YOUR DRIVEWAY WIDTH, AND HOW LONG? THE ONE THAT I DID ON THE OTHER FOUR WAS 20 BY, I WANT TO SAY MAYBE 26 OR 28.

AND THAT'S FOR TWO CARS. SO IT'S GOING TO BE TWO CARS.

SO YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE SUPPLEMENTAL AND VISITOR PARKING. WHERE IS THAT GOING TO GO? THAT IS UP TO A BAKER & LAWSON FOR THEM TO DO THEIR YOU KNOW, THEIR.

BUT IS GOING TO HAVE TO COME OUT OF THIS?. YEAH.

I THINK WE WANT TO SEE WHERE IT WAS. YEAH I WOULD WANT TO SEE WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO.

I MEAN, LET ME TELL YOU, I GOT LIKE A 1700 SQUARE FOOT HOUSE NEXT TO ME AND THEY GOT LIKE SIX CARS.

THEY'RE DRIVING UP ON MY LAWN TO PARK ON THEIR LAWN.

YEAH. SO. SO, MR. SPRIGGS, AM I CORRECT OR INCORRECT IN MY UNDERSTANDING THAT WE'RE SIMPLY APPROVING THE OR BEING ASKED.

THE REZONING. THE REZONING, AND AT SOME FUTURE DATE WE WILL SEE A PLAT.

YOU SEE THE PLAT THAT DEALS WITH THE ACREAGE ITSELF, BUT THE CONDITIONS OF PARKING ARE PART OF THAT MH DISTRICT SO THAT WOULD BE ONE OF THE CONDITIONS THAT HE SATISFIES THAT I PUT IN THE STAFF REPORT WHAT THE CALCULATION HAS TO BE I THINK IT'S JUST STANDARD, PROBABLY TWO CARS PER, PER TRAILER PROBABLY. AND THEN I THINK THERE'S A FORMULA FOR EVERY THREE TRAILERS.

[00:20:01]

WE MIGHT JUST HAVE TO DO THAT INSTEAD OF FOR A TWO CAR OR THREE CAR DRIVE, YOU KNOW.

BUT LIKE I SAID, I WAS TELLING THEM IT MIGHT BE. JUST LIKE YOU CAN STACK THREE CARS IN THE DRIVEWAY, YOU CAN SATISFY THAT REQUIREMENT.

YEAH. WELL, NOW THAT I THINK IT'S DEEP ENOUGH TO PUT TWO [INAUDIBLE] .

YEAH, WE COULD. I MEAN, BAKER AND LAWSON GIVE ME THAT REPORT.

YOU'RE ONLY ADDING TWO VISITOR SPACES FOR THESE SIX UNITS, SO YOU NEED TO FIGURE THAT PART OUT.

AND I THINK YOU CAN. IT'S JUST ALL OF THEM DON'T HAVE TO BE THREE.

MAYBE A COUPLE OF THEM. YEAH. AND I DO THINK MY LAST TWO QUESTIONS ARE PROBABLY MORE FOR STAFF.

I THOUGHT I REMEMBERED WHENEVER OUR ORIGINAL AGENDA CAME OUT, A COMMENT FROM A NEIGHBOR, I GUESS, ABOUT VISUAL SCREENING. IS THAT? THE ORIGINAL I GUESS COMMENT FROM MR. WEAVER WAS HE FELT THAT NEEDED TO. HE THOUGHT IT WAS GOING ALL THE WAY UP TO ANDERSON.

I UNDERSTAND OKAY. AND WE LATER FOUND OUT THAT HE'S RETAINING THE SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AT HIS APPROVAL, CAN MODIFY THE REQUEST, SCALE IT BACK TO THE ACREAGE THAT YOU SEE ON THE NEW PLAN WOULD BE 0.894, WOULD BE THE ONLY THING YOU WOULD BE CHANGING TO MH IF YOU AGREE.

AND THEN MY NEXT QUESTION, I MIGHT HAVE TWO MORE.

SORRY. SO IT MIGHT BE THREE TOTAL. WHEN IT WAS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED TO US FOR SIX MOBILE HOME SLOTS.

WE THOUGHT THAT OTHER THIRD OF AN ACRE WAS GOING ALL THE WAY UP.

SO MY CONCERN IS PERHAPS SIX IS NOT A FEASIBLE NUMBER ANYMORE.

PERHAPS IT NEEDS TO BE MORE LIKE FOUR. THAT WAS HIS PURPOSE FOR DOING THE SURVEY PLAN CONCEPT DRAWING, BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO DOUBLE CHECK THOSE NUMBERS.

AND THEN MY LAST QUESTION IS WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT OUR CRITERIA, AND I'M LOOKING SPECIFICALLY AT B, WHETHER THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS IN ACCORD WITH ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED PLANS.

MY CONCERN, AND I'VE EXPRESSED THIS ONE BEFORE IN REGARDS TO OTHER DEVELOPMENTS IS WATER SUPPLY.

AND THEN THE NUMBER OF TAPS THAT THE CITY HAS LEFT AND AVAILABLE AND ARE AGING AND ARGUABLY FAILING SEWER INFRASTRUCTURES.

IF THIS LAND LEFT AS SINGLE FAMILY WOULD ONLY POTENTIALLY ACCOMMODATE MAYBE 2 TO 3 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, BUT NOW WE'RE GOING TO PUT 4 TO 6 TAPS AND SEWER TAPS.

AND I HAVE INFRASTRUCTURE CONCERNS. SO I GUESS WHAT STUDIES HAVE BEEN DONE OR WILL BE DONE BY STAFF OR ENGINEERING THAT CAN, I GUESS, ALLAY THAT CONCERN OR SATISFY THAT CONCERN THAT THIS WILL NOT, IN FACT, POTENTIALLY HAVE A DELETERIOUS EFFECT ON THOSE UTILITIES.

AND YOU MAKE A GOOD POINT. WE'VE BEEN LOOKING CLOSER AT OUR CAPACITY, RIGHT NOW WE HAVE APPROXIMATELY 300 TAPS ABOVE THE ALREADY APPROVED DEVELOPMENTS. SO THE 300 NUMBER IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN NEGOTIATING WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS.

HOWEVER, AS YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THOSE DEVELOPMENTS HAVE NOT MOVED OR BEGUN.

SO WE'RE PURCHASING THE WATER STILL FROM BWA FOR THAT 2000 TO 3000 CONNECTIONS THAT WE HAVE.

BUT IF WE WERE TO PUT SOME OF THAT TO USE NOW, THAT COULD BE AN ADVANTAGE TO THE CITY BECAUSE WE'RE NOT, YOU KNOW, JUST SITTING ON WATER THAT'S AVAILABLE AND NO ONE IS MOVING THEIR DEVELOPMENTS FAST ENOUGH.

SO THIS IS A SMALL IMPACT, I THINK, AS OPPOSED TO US LOOKING AT AN ACTUAL NEW SUBDIVISION AND ASKING THAT SAME QUESTION.

BUT YOU SAYING.

I HAVE A PROBLEM IN THE FACT THAT ALL THOSE OLD TRAILERS THAT ARE OUT THERE, THEY WERE THERE WHEN I WAS A KID.

THEY WERE NOT IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON. AND WHEN THEY STARTED DEVELOPING HOUSING AND THEY CAME UP TO DWYER STREET, THEY STOPPED THERE. THAT WAS WHERE HE'S TALKING ABOUT WAS PASTURE LAND.

AND THEN THERE WAS TRAILER PARK. AND SINCE THEN TOWN HAS COME THIS WAY SOUTH OUT AND THEY'RE DEVELOPING HOMES AND I THINK CONSISTENT WITH THAT GROWTH GOING SOUTH THAT WE SHOULD CONTINUE TO PUT HOMES IN.

I'M SORRY, I LIVED IN A MOBILE HOME, SO I KNOW WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT.

BUT I JUST DON'T THINK THAT IT'S GOOD FOR THE NEIGHBORHOODS DOWN THERE.

I THINK THAT YOU NEED LARGER LOTS WITH ADEQUATE DRIVEWAYS, WITH SOME BACKYARD.

SO, YOU KNOW, YOUR NEIGHBORS ARE WORRIED ABOUT FENCING IT OFF SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO LOOK AT IT, BECAUSE, QUITE FRANKLY, MOBILE HOMES DETERIORATE MUCH FASTER THAN A REGULAR HOME.

AND I WOULD UNDERSTAND THAT. AND IF I'M BUILDING A $250,000 HOUSE ON ANDERSON STREET, AND THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE

[00:25:10]

THAT, I MEAN, THE CONSISTENCY IS NOT THERE. AND I JUST, I, YOU KNOW, FOUR TRAILERS, MAYBE YOU'RE GETTING BIGGER LOTS. BUT I JUST THINK YOU'RE I THINK YOU'RE ASKING FOR ISSUES.

I DO, ME TOO. ALSO I THINK I HAVE A CONTENTION ON WITH OUR D HERE THAT THE CONTENTION THAT THIS WILL PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AFFORDABLE LIVING UNITS.

GIVEN THAT THIS IS A DOUBLE LEASING SITUATION MOST LIKELY.

I THINK IT'S NOT NECESSARILY GOING TO BE ALL THAT MUCH MORE AFFORDABLE THAN SOME OF THE OTHER DEVELOPMENTS FOR THAT SAME AMOUNT OF [INAUDIBLE].

UTILITY HOOKUPS AND LAND. ALSO, I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH WAIVING THE IDEA THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE CONTINGENT ON WAIVING THE SIDEWALK. WE'RE BECOMING A SIGNIFICANTLY MORE WALKABLE CITY, AND WE PUT A LOT OF MONEY INTO THAT.

AND TO JUST KIND OF SAY, NO, WE DON'T NEED IT NOW.

NO, THIS IS NOT AN AUTOMATIC WAIVER. THAT'S JUST A PROCESS.

SO WE WOULD STILL REQUIRE IT ALL THE WAY TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S HIS JOB TO EITHER PUT THEM IN DURING THE PLANNING PROCESS, OR REQUEST A WAIVER BEFORE COUNCIL AND COUNSEL.

YOU CAN RECOMMEND AGAINST THAT. YEAH. YEAH. ALL RIGHT.

SO WE'VE HAD EXTENSIVE DISCUSSION AND. I GOT A QUESTION, MR. ANDREW WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY DOUBLE LEASING? WELL, I THINK A LOT OF THESE AND I COULD BE WRONG, BUT A LOT OF THESE MOBILE HOMES ARE NOT BEING THAT ARE OWNED BY ONE PERSON AND THEN ARE RENTED OUT EITHER ON A PER INDIVIDUAL ROOM BASIS OR AS A WHOLE BASIS. SO THEY'RE LEASING THE LOT FROM YOU AND THEN THEY'RE LEASING THE HOME OUT TO THE RENTERS.

ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THE NEW ONE THAT CAME IN OR THE ONES THAT FROM 1978? I'M JUST I'M TALKING ABOUT THE NEW ONES. WE'RE NOT.

YOU'RE 100% WRONG ON THAT. OKAY. SO THEY'RE NOT BEING.

SO NEW. THE FOUR THAT WE BUILT A YEAR AGO. THOSE ARE OWNER OCCUPIED.

THOSE ARE OWNER OCCUPIED. WHERE ARE THOSE FOUR ON THAT MAP? THEY'RE RIGHT NEXT TO THE. TO THIS. RIGHT NEXT TO IT.

SORRY. CAN WE GO BACK TO THE SLIDE? RIGHT HERE, THEY'RE RIGHT HERE.

RIGHT THERE. RIGHT NEXT TO IT. THIS IS. THIS IS MOBILE HOME ZONE.

THEY SAT VACANT FOR A LONG TIME. AND NOW THERE ARE FOUR MOBILE HOMES ON IT?.

I DIDN'T KNOW HE HAD PLACED THE UNITS, BUT THE LOTS.

THE LOTS ARE THERE. OH, WHAT IS THE LOT SIZES ON THOSE? THE SAME 50. SAME 50. AT THAT TIME THERE'S A 40 OR 45 GOING BACK TO FREEPORT WHEN I WAS BUILDING.

YOU BUILD A BIG OLD HOUSE.

THE 50 BECAUSE THAT SHOULD GIVE US AN IDEA OF WHAT. I DON'T THINK THOSE YOU HADN'T PLACED ALL THE.

ALL FOUR OF THOSE. YES, SIR.

SO WE'VE GOT SOME PLACED. SO THAT'S THE PHOTOGRAPHS.

GRACE. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. IF YOU LOOK AT THE IF YOU LOOK AT THE MAP, WE CAN SEE A COUPLE OF.

ON THE MAP. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. SO THAT'S KIND OF THE PLACEMENT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THERE.

THOSE ARE THOSE ARE SINGLE WIDES OR THOSE DOUBLE WIDES?.

THERE'S THE THREE SINGLES AND ONE DOUBLE. AND THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF HAVING A 50 FOOT LOT THAT YOU COULD FIT THEM DOUBLE WIDE.

OKAY. SO THAT'S THE DRIVEWAY SPACE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. YEAH. YOU HAVE TROUBLE GETTING THE VISITOR ONE ON THERE.

ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. AND WE DID PROPOSE, YOU KNOW, TO TALK ABOUT.

I KNOW, LIKE I SAID, EVERYBODY, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE A BAD RAP, YOU KNOW, MOBILE HOMES.

I'LL BE HONEST WITH YOU. THEY HAVE A BAD RAP.

AND YOU KNOW, AND A LOT OF TIMES YOU MENTIONED MOBILE HOME PEOPLE.

THEY START ACTING A CERTAIN KIND OF WAY. SO WE WERE THINKING ABOUT HOW WE PLAN ON KEEPING THAT HOUSE BUILDING THAT PRIVACY FENCE AS HIGH AS WE COULD MAKE IT OR WHATNOT, OR WE GET A SPECIAL PERMIT TO GET IT EVEN HIGHER THAN WHAT IT WHAT Y'ALL ALLOW NOW.

BUT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE COULD. ALL RIGHT.

WELL, WELL, THANK YOU, MR. GONZALEZ. I THINK WE'VE GOT ALL OUR QUESTIONS ANSWERED.

UNLESS THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS.

CAN I ASK ONE MORE QUESTION OF STAFF? WHAT HAPPENS IF WE MOVE TO REZONE AND THE MOTION CARRIES, BUT THEN AFTER PLATTING IS DONE, IT'S JUST NOT FEASIBLE, I GUESS.

AND THEN IT'S JUST STUCK AS A MOBILE HOME COMMUNITY ZONE .

YOU SAY FEASIBLE, WHAT DO YOU MEAN? PERHAPS THE APPLICANT DECIDES THAT IT'S NOT FINANCIALLY WORTH IT TO BECAUSE OF THE PARKING THAT THEY WOULD HAVE

[00:30:10]

TO PROVIDE AND MAYBE THE NUMBER OF LOTS BEING PARTICIPATED, THEN IT JUST HANGS OUT THERE, VACANT AS ZONED TO MOBILE HOME. ALL OF THE CONDITIONS HAVE TO BE SATISFIED.

OKAY. SO, YEAH, ANYTHING HE WOULD IMPLEMENT WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL THE CONDITIONS THAT YOU PLACE.

THERE'S NO GIVE AND TAKE. OKAY. AND JUST TO THAT IT WILL BE FINANCIALLY FEASIBLE BECAUSE I DO NOT PLAN ON RESELLING IT AND, YOU KNOW, RUN IT ONE DAY THAT WAY. ALL RIGHT.

THANK YOU, MR. GONZALEZ. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, WHAT'S YOUR PLEASURE? YOU'RE LOOKING FOR A MOTION OR WHAT? YES, SIR.

SO WE CAN GO ON ITEM THREE. THE SUGGESTION MOTION HERE SAYS REZONING 0.36 BUT THE. IT'S AN ACRE OF LAND, THOUGH, ISN'T IT? IT WOULD BE THE 0.894.

AND I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT TYPO, BUT FROM OUR DISCUSSIONS, IT WOULD BE 0.894 IF NO ONE OBJECTS TO REZONE, ONLY THAT WHICH IS HATCHED ON THE EXHIBIT THAT YOU HAVE, AND WE WILL USE THAT FOR THE MAP INSTEAD.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION I MOVE WE FIND THAT REVIEW CRITERIA, FINDINGS OF FACT ARE ESTABLISHED AND APPROVE THE ORDINANCE REZONING 0.894 ACRES FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 7.2 ZONING DISTRICT TO MANUFACTURED HOME PARK ZONING DISTRICT FOR 1030 SOUTH ANDERSON. FORWARD THIS ITEM TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS.

FIRST, THE USES PERMITTED ON THE PROPERTY. BE RESTRICTED TO FOUR MANUFACTURED HOME SPACES.

THE OWNER FILE A MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

ALL FIRE HYDRANT AND FIRE LANE ACCESS REQUIREMENTS BE MET BY APPLICANT AND APPLICANT MUST POST NO PARKING SIGNAGE ALONG MAXIE LANE WITH ONE WAY SIGNAGE AT PUBLIC INTERSECTIONS.

THE APPLICANT MUST MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 28-54 AND SECTION 28 101 FOR BOTH ON SITE AND VISITOR AND SUPPLEMENTAL PARKING. MAXIE LANE, WHICH IS A PRIVATE ROAD, MUST BE IMPROVED WITH CONTINUOUS HARD SURFACING FOR ADEQUATE ACCESS PER SECTION 28-54 OF THE ANGLETON CODE OF ORDINANCES.

CONCRETE WALKWAYS AT FOUR FEET IN WIDTH MUST BE PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF ROADWAYS OR STREETS, UNLESS A VARIANCE IS GRANTED, IS I'M SORRY REQUESTED AND GRANTED BY CITY COUNCIL.

AND LASTLY, APPLICANT COMPLIES COMPLETELY WITH PARKLAND DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS PER SECTION 23-20 OF ANGLETON'S CODE OF ORDINANCES.

ALL RIGHT. A MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND. I SECOND THAT MOTION.

AND MR. CLARK SECONDS. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CAN I SAY SOMETHING? THANK YOU SIR. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? AYE. AYE. OKAY, SO THE MOTION FAILS 1 TO 4. ALL RIGHT. MR. GONZALEZ, WE ARE AN ADVISORY COMMISSION. WE DO NOT SET POLICY. AND THIS WILL STILL GO TO CITY COUNCIL IN TWO WEEKS.

THREE WEEKS. NEXT WEEK. NEXT WEEK. FOR THEIR CONSIDERATION, I WOULD STRONGLY ENCOURAGE YOU TO BE PRESENT AT THAT MEETING TO BE PREPARED TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT CITY COUNCIL MAY HAVE.

THANK YOU SIR. ITEM THREE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON CONFIRMING THE NEXT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED FOR JULY 3RD,

[3. Discussion and possible action on confirming the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting scheduled for July 3, 2025.]

2025. I WILL BE AVAILABLE. OF THE ALTERNATE DATES AND INCLUDING THE ORIGINAL DATE, I CAN ONLY MAKE JUNE 30TH. I CAN MAKE JUNE 30TH. JUNE 30TH.

IT'S A MONDAY. I HAVE IT LISTED AS A MONDAY. I'M HOPING I'M CORRECT.

I THINK I'M AVAILABLE. I THINK I'M AVAILABLE. I CAN MAKE JUNE 30TH.

OKAY. WE CAN SKIP ROTARY. YEAH, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO.

WE MAY HAVE TO. OR IF EVERYBODY CAN MAKE IT THE THIRD, Y'ALL LEAVE IT THE THIRD.

I MEAN, I DON'T WANT, YOU KNOW, IF EVERYBODY ELSE CAN MAKE IT THE THIRD.

DON'T CHANGE IT JUST FOR ME. I MEAN, I CAN MAKE EITHER DAY.

[00:35:01]

YEAH. SO IT'S WHATEVER WORKS. AS LONG AS IT DOESN'T CONFLICT WITH THAT LONG TERM PLANNING COMMISSION THAT WE GOT GOING.

THE CPAC? WE HAVEN'T SET THE DATE. THEY HAVEN'T SET THE DATES FOR THAT YET.

YEAH THAT'S ON MONDAY'S I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. SO THERE YOU GO.

DO YOU HAVE THE FEEDBACK YOU NEED. THE 30TH WE'LL SAVE IT FOR THE 30TH.

OKAY. THANK YOU. JUNE 30TH. ITEM FOUR. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT STREET

[4. Discussion and possible action on the Preliminary Plat of Ashland Development Street Dedication 5, southeast extension of the Future Sapphire Springs Trail.]

DEDICATION FIVE SOUTHEAST EXTENSION OF THE FUTURE SAPPHIRE SPRINGS TRAIL.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS A PLAT, THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT DEDICATION STREET PLAT NUMBER FIVE.

AND WE'VE GIVEN YOU THE GRAPHIC HERE THAT SHOWS THAT EXTENSION OF SAPPHIRE TRAILS AS PART OF ASHLAND.

THIS PARTICULAR PLAT WAS FORWARDED TO OUR CITY ENGINEER WHO HAS REVIEWED THE PLAT, AND THERE WERE 12 OUTSTANDING COMMENTS THAT WERE ALL TEXTUAL IN NATURE. THE APPLICANT DID SUBMIT A CORRECTION.

AND ALL OF THE RESPONSES I THINK ARE SATISFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS, AS WE CAN SEE HERE.

AND SO WE HAVE CLEARED THOSE COMMENTS REQUESTING THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION WOULD MOVE THIS ON, THE CITY COUNCIL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL FOR THE STREET DEDICATION PLAT NUMBER FIVE, PRELIMINARY PLAT.

SUBJECT TO ANY REFERRAL AGENCIES, WHICH WOULD INCLUDE BRAZORIA COUNTY AND THAT WOULD DEAL WITH, OF COURSE, ANY TYPE OF DRAINAGE OR ANY OTHER REQUIREMENT THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO SATISFY IN TERMS OF ANY COUNTY ROAD CONNECTIONS AND ANY PERMITTING WHICH WOULD BE IN OUR ETJ, AS YOU KNOW, AS PART OF THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT, SUBJECT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS? ANYONE WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION FIVE STREET DEDICATION, PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUBJECT TO REFERRAL AGENCY APPROVAL AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION.

SECOND. MOTION BY MISS TOWNSEND, SECONDED BY THE MISS SPOOR.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION, IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM FIVE. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLAND SECTION EIGHT,

[5. Discussion and possible action on the Preliminary Plat of Ashland Section 8, located north of the intersection of the future Ashland Blvd./CR32 and the future Sapphire Springs Trail.]

LOCATED NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF FUTURE ASHLAND BOULEVARD, COUNTY ROAD 32 AND FUTURE SAPPHIRE SPRINGS TRAIL.

MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU. THIS IS SECTION EIGHT, AS YOU SEE ON THE CONCEPT PLAN WHERE THIS IS LOCATED.

IT WOULD BE FEEDING OFF OF THAT SAPPHIRE TRAIL SPRINGS DEDICATION PLAT THAT WE JUST MENTIONED.

JUST ABOVE OR I'M SORRY, BELOW SECTION SEVEN THERE AND ALSO EAST OF SECTION FIVE SHOWN HERE.

THIS PARTICULAR PLAT IS ON 26.11 ACRES, 86 LOTS.

THERE ARE FOUR DRAINAGE AND LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE RESERVES, AS YOU SEE HERE ON FOUR BLOCKS.

THE MAJORITY OF THESE LOTS ARE THE 55 FOOT LOT IN WIDTH BY 120.

THIS PLAT WENT BEFORE OUR CITY ENGINEER. THERE WERE TEN COMMENTS THAT WERE ALL TEXTURAL IN NATURE.

THE APPLICANTS HAVE SUBMITTED THAT RESPONSE, AND THE ENGINEER HAS CLEARED ALL OF THE TEN COMMENTS THAT YOU SEE HERE.

WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL THAT YOU FORWARD THIS TO COUNCIL, SUBJECT TO THE AGENCY REFERRAL AGENCY APPROVAL MENTIONED EARLIER.

QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS. MOTION. MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION EIGHT PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUBJECT TO REFERRAL AGENCY APPROVAL, AND FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION.

SECOND. [LAUGHTER] I HAVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CLARK AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.