ALL RIGHT. WE WILL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER. WELCOME TO THE. [00:00:04] THIS IS ACTUALLY THE JULY VERSION OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON PLANNING AND ZONING. WE'RE DOING IT A COUPLE OF DAYS EARLY BECAUSE OF THE HOLIDAY. OUR FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 5TH, [1. Discussion and possible action on the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on June 5, 2025. ] 2025. HOPEFULLY EVERYONE HAS HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES AND IF SO, ARE THERE ANY CORRECTIONS AND IF NOT, WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I'LL MOVE APPROVAL SECOND. ALRIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SPOOR AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND. IF THERE'S NO DISCUSSION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE . OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION PASSES. ITEM TWO. [2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on an ordinance rezoning 0.43 acres from the Commercial General District to the Central Business Zoning District (CBD), for property located at 405 E. Mulberry St. in the City of Angleton.] CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE. REZONING 0.43 ACRES FROM THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT TO THE CENTRAL BUSINESS ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 405 EAST MULBIERI STREET IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON. MR. SPRIGGS. YES, SIR. I'LL INTRODUCE THIS. INTRODUCE THIS ITEM. IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. JUST TO LET YOU KNOW, ON THESE 0.43 ACRES OF LAND PROPERTY SITUATED AT 405 EAST MULBIERI WAS SUBMITTED FOR REZONING BY MR. AND MRS. CHRISTENSEN. REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT TO THE DOWNTOWN CBD DISTRICT. CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT. AS YOU SEE ON THE MAP, WE HAVE UP THE LAND USE MAP THE AREA IN BLUE. IF YOU PICTURE WHERE 35 SORT OF BY SIX, THAT BLUE AREA. THEIR PROPERTY IS ONLY 1 OR 2 PROPERTIES IN TO THE EAST WHERE YOU SEE THE RED CIRCLES. SO ABUTTING THAT DISTRICT WOULD BE THE PROPERTY 405 EAST MULBIERI. ON THE LAND USE, WE FOUND CONSISTENCY WITH WHAT'S BEING RECOMMENDED FOR THIS AREA. AS YOU KNOW, THERE IS A MIX OF USES THAT HAVE BEEN CONVERTED FROM RESIDENTIAL TO LOW INTENSE OFFICE SLASH LOW INTENSE RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES. I EVEN DID A SURROUNDING SIMILARLY USE TABLE ON THE NEXT COUPLE OF PAGES, WHICH GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF THE TYPE OF USES I JUST DESCRIBED. THE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ARE LOOKING AT FURTHER MARKETING IN THE PROPERTY FOR A TENANT THAT WOULD HAVE A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL, SIMILARLY TO WHAT YOU SEE ON THE ATTORNEY, INSURANCE AGENT SLASH ONE ON ONE TYPE BUSINESS USES WITHIN THE VICINITY. SO CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY, AS I STATED, IS ZONED COMMERCIAL GENERAL, AND AS YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL GENERAL HAS A WHOLE GAMUT OF AVAILABLE USAGE IN WHICH THIS PROPERTY OWNER HAS NO INTENT TO PUT THOSE HIGHER INTENSE COMMERCIAL USES ON THE PROPERTY. SO SOMETIME ON THE TAX ASSESSMENT LEVEL, THOSE PROPERTIES CAN BE OVERTAXED IN TERMS OF THE USE CATEGORY, BECAUSE THE ASSESSOR USES A DIFFERENT TABLE OF USES THAN WE DO ON THE ZONING SIDE. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT, THE APPLICANT CAN FURTHER EXPLAIN THAT TO YOU. I'VE GIVEN YOU THE SURROUNDING CONDITIONS. AS NOTED, THE PHOTOGRAPHS FURTHER DOWN IN THE PRESENTATION, WHICH SHOW WHAT I JUST DESCRIBED IN TERMS OF THE EXISTING USE, WHICH HAS THE VERY NICE STRUCTURE, WHICH HAS BEEN RENOVATED WITH THE RESIDENTIAL IN THE REAR. WE ALSO LOOKED AT THE CRITERIA FOR REZONING, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WHAT THEY'RE ASKING IS IN THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF THE DISTRICT. WE FOUND NO ISSUES WITH THE CRITERIA FOR REZONINGS, IN WHICH THE COUNCIL AND YOU HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO WEIGH AGAINST WHAT THEY'RE ASKING. THERE WOULD BE NO ADDITIONAL LOAD ON UTILITIES AND SERVICES IN THE AREA, AND SO WITH THIS TYPE OF USE, WE FOUND IT TO BE PRETTY CONSISTENT WITH WHAT THE LONG RANGE PLAN WOULD BE FOR THE AREA. AS REQUIRED, WE DID NOTIFY EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPERTY AND ALSO POSTED IT DULY IN THE LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT FOR THE REZONING. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER THIS ANY INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC OR QUESTIONS TO THE APPLICANT? WE WILL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AFTER THAT FROM STAFF. SO PLEASE CONSIDER THIS AND FORWARDING THIS TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION OF THE ORDINANCE. REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM COMMERCIAL GENERAL TO CBD. FOR THE PROPERTY NOTED AT 405 EAST MULBIERI. THANK YOU, MR. SPRIGGS. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVE. SIR, I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIERI AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE. SO BY SAYING I. I GO TO THE SAME SIGN AT THIS TIME. PUBLIC HEARING IS OPEN. IF THERE'S ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS ITEM. YOU ARE WELCOME TO GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE, AND AT THIS TIME I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. [00:05:05] OKAY, I'VE GOT A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIERI AND A SECOND BY SECOND COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT. DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANTS ABOUT THIS REQUEST? JUST A COMMENT. I KNOW THAT ANYTHING THAT Y'ALL HAVE DONE ALWAYS LOOKS AWESOME. SO I KNOW THAT ANYTHING THAT YOU WILL DO IN THE FUTURE WILL LOOK AWESOME AS WELL. BECAUSE YOUR SPACE ALWAYS DOES LOOK GOOD. I GO DOWN PAST IT ALL THE TIME. OKAY. COMMENT. WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? I WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVING THE ORDINANCE. REZONING THE APPROXIMATE POINT FOR THREE ACRES OF LAND FROM COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT CG TO CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT, CBD TO AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL AND APPROVAL. I SECOND IT. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER CLARK. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING I OPPOSE. SAME SIGN, AND THIS WILL BE HEARD ON THE 8TH OF JULY. 8TH OF JULY , COUNCIL. GOOD LUCK TO YOU ALL. I DON'T THINK YOU'RE GOING TO ENCOUNTER A WHOLE LOT OF PUSHBACK, BUT IT'S ALWAYS GOOD TO ATTEND THOSE MEETINGS REGARDLESS. ITEM THREE DISCUSSION. YOU'RE WELCOME TO STAY OR LEAVE WHATEVER YOU CHOOSE. ITEM THREE DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF ASHLAND. [3. Discussion and possible action on the Preliminary Plat of Ashland Section 7, located northeast of the intersection of the future Ashland Blvd./CR32 and the future Sapphire Springs Trail.] SECTION SEVEN, LOCATED NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF THE FUTURE ASHLAND BOULEVARD, COUNTY ROAD 32, AND THE FUTURE SAPPHIRE SPRINGS TRAIL. MR. SPRIGGS? YES, SIR. THANK YOU. THIS IS ASHLAND SECTION SEVEN. IN WHICH WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO FORWARD THIS REQUEST FOR ASHLAND. SECTION SEVEN, AS YOU SEE HERE, IF YOU WOULD JUST ROLL DOWN JUST A LITTLE BIT RIGHT THERE. STOP UP A LITTLE BIT THE OTHER WAY, AND I DO APOLOGIZE, IF YOU COULD THE TEXT RIGHT ABOVE. I JUST NEED TO READ THAT. THANK YOU. RIGHT THERE. THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION, AS YOU KNOW, IS IN OUR ETJ AS PART OF THE SPA AND DA WHICH WAS FURTHER APPROVED IN 2023 FOR THE PROPERTY. SECTION SEVEN HAS 117 LOTS, FIVE UTILITY RESERVES DEALING WITH DRAINAGE, OPEN SPACE AS WELL, AND SIX BLOCKS. THIS SECTION, AS YOU SEE LOCATED ON THE HIGHLIGHTED AREA, IS JUST ABOVE SECTION EIGHT AND WHICH YOU APPROVED LAST TIME. THE CITY ENGINEER DID REVIEW THE PROPOSAL AND UNFORTUNATELY, DURING THE AGENDA POSTING, WE HAD NOT RECEIVED THE COMMENTS OR RESPONSES BACK FROM THE THE APPLICANT ON ALL 21 ITEMS. I WAS ABLE TO CLEAR THOSE THROUGH THE CITY ENGINEER. IN TERMS OF THE 21 ITEMS WHICH DEALT WITH TEXTUAL CHANGES REFERENCES WHERE THE BEARING AND DISTANCES DID NOT MATCH THE TABLES ASSOCIATED TABLES WITHIN THE DOCUMENT. THEY HAVE, OF COURSE, ADDRESSED ALL 21 ITEMS BEFORE THE CITY ENGINEER, AND WE'RE JUST WAITING ON THAT LETTER IN WHICH WE WOULD FORWARD TO COUNCIL. SO WE ARE RECOMMENDING THAT YOU WOULD CONSIDER THIS PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SECTION SEVEN ASHLAND WITH THOSE NOTED CONDITIONS BEING CLEARED, AND THEN FURTHER TO COUNCIL FORWARDING IT TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION. IS IT 21 OR IS IT 19? OR AM I ON THE WRONG ONE? WE'RE ON ITEM THREE, RIGHT? ITEM THREE. YES. YEAH. I'M LOOKING AT THE ON THE THE SUMMARY FORM. I'M SHOWING 19 ITEMS. OH. I'M SORRY. WE HAVE I KNOW WE GOT A COUPLE OF THEM ON TODAY. YEAH, I HAVE A COPY OF THE THE LETTER FROM HDR. YES. THAT WOULD BE ALL THE TIME RESPONSES. OKAY. YEAH. I'M SEEING. SAME AS YOU, I DO IT. AM I IN THE WRONG? NO, I DON'T THINK SO. SEE, IN OUR PACKET THERE'S 19. YEAH. YEAH. 18 IS 20 ON THIS LIST. 19. I APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. SORRY. OKAY. OH, IS IT JUST MIS NUMBERED? MAYBE THE NUMBERING GOT OFF. OKAY. OKAY. OKAY. YEAH, THEY PROBABLY COMBINED THEM TOGETHER, AND I'M GOING TO HAVE ONE QUESTION, AND IT'S GOING TO BE FOR THREE, FOUR AND FIVE. I KNOW ALL THESE ELEMENTS OUR ETJ, AND SO THERE'S A STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ON ALL OF THEM. IS THIS COMPLIANT WITH THE TERMS OF THOSE AGREEMENTS IN LOT SIZE AND FEATURES AND ALL THOSE SORTS OF THINGS? YES. WE'VE BEEN TRACKING THE MATRIX IN TERMS OF THE NUMBER OF LOTS PER SECTION, AND IT WILL BE CONSISTENT. [00:10:01] OKAY. YEAH, AND WE'RE TRACKING THAT. ANY CONCEPT PLAN PROPOSALS. THERE'S A PROCESS FOR THAT AND WE'RE TRACKING THAT THROUGH THE COUNCIL. I KNOW THERE WAS SOME COMMENTS ON THERE FROM THE CITY ENGINEER JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT NATURE PRESERVE IS PROTECTED, BUT WE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THOSE THINGS ARE CARED FOR THROUGHOUT. OKAY. I WILL SAY THAT THERE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF STARTING BUILDING HOUSES IN YOUR MODEL HOME COMMUNITY PORTION, AND THEN YOU'LL SEE PROBABLY HOUSES IN ANOTHER SECTION POP UP CLOSELY THEREAFTER, AND THAT PART OF THAT IS TRACKING THE NUMBER OF CERTAIN SIZE LOTS THAT WERE AGREED TO. RIGHT WRITE IN THOSE AGREEMENTS? YEAH. THERE IS NO ZONING THAT WILL CONTROL THE NUMBER OF BLOCKS. SO THOSE ARE KIND OF NEGOTIATED THROUGH. IN TERMS OF PERCENTAGES, BUT YES, WE ARE WEIGHING THOSE IN. OKAY. SO THEY'RE NOT OVER THEIR PERCENTAGES ON. OKAY. THANK YOU I MEAN THAT NATURE PRESERVE THAT'S PART OF THEIR WHOLE DRAINAGE PLAN, RIGHT? THERE'S SOME PASSIVE DRAINAGE THAT WILL HAPPEN IN THOSE AREAS, BUT YEAH, THAT WOULD BE PRESERVED NATURALLY. YEAH. JUST LIKE THERE'S 19 ITEMS. TWO OF THE RESPONSES GOT NUMBERED ITEMS. YEAH. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS? WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION? IF NOT. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE THE ASHLAND DEVELOPMENT SECTION SEVEN PRELIMINARY PLAT, SUBJECT TO REFERRAL AGENCY APPROVAL AND SUBJECT TO THE APPLICANT ADDRESSING ALL OF ENGINEERING'S COMMENTS PRIOR TO CITY COUNCIL CONSIDERING THE PLAT. SECOND, MR. ROBERTSON, WAS THAT A SECOND? I DID SEE SHE MIGHT HAVE BEEN BEFORE ME. NO. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ROBERTSON. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM FOUR: DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE WINDROWS GREEN. [4. Discussion and possible action on the Windrose Green Section 6 Final Plat, located off Atlas Point Lane/Starlight Street, just south of Section 5.] SECTION SIX FINAL PLAT LOCATED OFF ATLAS POINT LANE AND STARLIGHT STREET, JUST SOUTH OF SECTION FIVE. MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR WINDROWS GREEN, SECTION SIX, LOCATED OFF ATLAS POINT LANE AND STARLIGHT STREET, JUST SOUTH OF SECTION FIVE. WE'VE NOTED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN JUST BELOW THIS IN TERMS OF THE 78 LOT LOCATION. IF YOU ROLL UP JUST A LITTLE BIT ON THE 15.6 ACRES THERE, THAT WOULD BE THE SECTION YOU'RE ENTERTAINING. FOR THE LOTS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SECTION. THE COMMENTS DID GO BEFORE THE CITY ENGINEER AND RESPONSES WERE SUBMITTED BACK WITH CLEARING. OF THOSE. CITY ENGINEER DID CERTIFY THE FACT THAT THEY'VE SATISFIED ALL OF THESE TEXTUAL CHANGES FOR THE FINAL PLAT FOR SECTION SIX, AND THIS IS BEING REQUESTED TO YOU CONSIDER THE FORWARDED TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AND CONSIDERATION. ALL RIGHT. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS? JUST TO CONFIRM THIS, YOUR AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER EARLIER, THAT THE DISTRIBUTION OF LOT SIZES IS COMPLIANT WITH THE AGREEMENTS THAT COUNCIL EXECUTED WITH THE CONCEPT PLAN AND AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT AS WELL. THESE ARE YOUR 45 FOOT LOTS, AS YOU NOTED ON THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR THIS SECTION, AND THEY'RE CARRYING THEM FORTH. OKAY. YES, BUT THEY'RE WITHIN THE PERCENTAGES THAT COUNCIL AGREED TO. YES. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. CONSISTENT WITH THEIR CONCEPT PLAN, WHICH LEADS THEM OUT. ALL RIGHT. READY FOR A MOTION. READY. MOTION PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACCEPT THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE WINDROWS GREEN. SECTION SIX FINAL PLAT. SUBJECT TO FINAL ACTION AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I THINK COMMISSIONER BIERI GOT THAT ONE. SO I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER CLARK, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER BIERI. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION TO INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES ITEM FIVE. [5. Discussion and possible action on the Windrose Green Section 7 Final Plat, located off Parks Edge Lane and Milo Midnight Lane. ] DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE WINDROWS GREEN. SECTION SEVEN FINAL PLAT LOCATED OFF PARK EDGE LANE AND MILO MIDNIGHT LANE. MR. SPRIGGS, THANK YOU. THIS IS SECTION SEVEN UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT. THESE 62 LOTS ARE SITUATED WHERE YOU SEE HIGHLIGHTED THERE, JUST TO THE EAST OF SECTION EIGHT, IN WHICH WE JUST CONSIDERED. THE LOTS, OF COURSE, WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPT PLAN. [00:15:03] I'M SORRY THAT YOU SEE ON THE BOARD, AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NUMBER OF LOTS AND SIZES THAT ARE NOTED THEREOF. THE CITY ENGINEER DID REVIEW THE FINAL PLAT. GAVE A NUMBER OF COMMENTS IN WHICH THE APPLICANT WAS RESPONSIVE AND IN TERMS OF GIVING THOSE CORRECTIVE ITEMS, AND THEY WERE ALL TEXTUAL IN NATURE, AND WE HAVE BEEN CLEARED, AND WE'RE REQUESTING THIS TO MOVE ON TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL CONSIDERATION AND APPROVAL. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR. SPRIGGS? DO WE HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT THE COMPOSITION OF THE LOT SIZE ON THIS ONE? I PRESUME I BELIEVE THE AFFIRMATIVE ANSWER IS THE SAME FOR THAT. IT'S COMPLIANT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. WHAT YOU JUST SAID. YES. 72 IN THE BACK. SO IT'S RIGHT. HOW MANY DIFFERENT SECTIONS ARE WE GOING TO HAVE TOTAL IN WINDROSE GREEN? DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA OR IS THIS A DIFFERENT SECTION? YES, SIR. WE'RE AT SECTION 7 NOW, CORRECT? WE'RE ON SIX AND SEVEN; WE'RE GETTING VERY CLOSE TO TO THE COMPLETION ON THE NORTHERN SIDE OF THIS. THERE ARE OTHERS ON IT. YEAH. WE HAVE ONE MORE SECTION. SO YOU JUST APPROVED SECTION SIX FROM THE PREVIOUS SECTION. SECTION SEVEN IS THIS WHOLE OUTLINE HERE THAT CONNECTS TO SECTION THREE, AND ERSON ROAD IS DOWN HERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE. SO THIS ENTRANCE IS ALREADY BUILT OUT. THE ONLY REMAINING SECTION AFTER SECTION SEVEN IS THIS SECTION EIGHT, WHICH IS JUST A SINGLE THROUGH STREET, 50 FOOT LOTS. THEY'RE 50 FOOT? YES, SIR. DO WE SEE THE LOT SIZE GETTING ANY SMALLER ON THE LAST SECTION? OR DO WE KNOW 45 IS YOUR SMALL? 40 FOOT IS OUR SMALLEST, WHICH WAS ALREADY DEVELOPED IN SECTION THREE. THERE'S NO MORE REMAINING 40 FOOT PRODUCT SCREEN. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I'M HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN A MOTION. I'LL MOVE TO ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE WINDROSE GREEN SECTION SEVEN FINAL PLAT SUBJECT TO. WELL, THERE AREN'T ANY. RIGHT? THEY RESPONDED TO EVERYTHING. OKAY, AND FORWARD ON FOR FINAL ACTION. APPROVAL TO CITY COUNCIL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER HESTON. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES AND WE ARE ADJOURNED. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.