Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

ON THE RIGHT? READY ON THE LEFT? YEP. ALL RIGHT.

[Planning & Zoning Commission on August 7, 2025.]

[00:00:03]

IT IS NOON, AND WE WILL CALL OUR MEETING TO ORDER.

WELCOME TO THE AUGUST 7TH EDITION OF CITY OF ANGLETON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

OUR FIRST ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JUNE 30TH, 2025. HOPEFULLY EVERYONE'S HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THE MINUTES.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CLARK.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 2. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1.69 ACRES FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE 1000 BLOCK OF EAST ORANGE NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF FARRER STREET IN ANGLETON, TEXAS. MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU. GRACE WILL ASSIST ME WITH MOVING THE SLIDES HERE.

THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR A REZONING OF THE 1.69 ACRES.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY ZONED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL FOR THE 1.69 ACRES.

AND WE'VE GIVEN YOU INFORMATION REGARDING THE LAND USE PLAN AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WHICH IS PRETTY PARALLEL WITH WHAT THE ZONING CURRENTLY IS.

I THINK AT ONE TIME, THE CITY, PROBABLY MOST OF THEIR INDUSTRIAL USES WOULD BE SITUATED NEAR RAILROAD AND REVISIT SOME THINGS THAT ARE TYPICAL OF INDUSTRIAL USE.

TYPICALLY THERE ARE ON PRIMARY STREETS AND MAJOR HIGHWAYS.

OF COURSE, THIS IS NOT A MAJOR HIGHWAY OF ANY SORT.

AND THEN WHEN LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ACTUALLY ABUTS RESIDENTIAL, WE HOPE THAT THERE ARE BUFFERS THAT ARE SITUATED TO SEPARATE.

BUT WE SHOWED YOU SOME PHOTOGRAPHS THAT SHOWED EXISTING CONDITIONS.

OTHER THAN THE RAILROAD BEING THERE, I THINK THAT'S THE ONLY INDUSTRIAL GOING ON WITH SOME OTHER INDUSTRIAL USES FURTHER DOWN THE RAILROAD.

SO THE APPLICANT TODAY IS TRYING TO DO A PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU TO SUBDIVIDE THE PROPERTY INTO SIX LOTS IN WHICH HE HAS PROPOSED.

AND THERE IS A GRAPHIC IN YOUR REPORT THAT SHOWS THAT LAYOUT.

STAFF HAS GONE THROUGH THE CRITERIA FOR REZONING, AND WE TYPICALLY WILL WEIGH THE SURROUNDING CONDITIONS AND WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING.

AND WE FOUND NO MAJOR ISSUES, AS YOU CAN SEE, FOR ITEMS EIGHT THROUGH 12TH IN THE CRITERIA FOR REZONING.

IN TERMS OF INTENSITY, WHETHER OR NOT IT'S A USE THAT DOESN'T FIT IN THE AREA.

SO WHEN YOU ACTUALLY DRIVE THE AREA, IT'S MOSTLY RESIDENTIAL, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE PICK-UP SIDING, WHICH, YOU KNOW, WILL BE CONVERTED TO SOME TYPE OF TRANSFER STATION OR SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE.

BUT THERE ARE OTHER. THERE'S A RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE JUST EAST OF THIS PROPERTY, AS WE SHOWED IN THE SLIDES.

SO WHAT WE DID ALSO IS WE PROVIDED YOU WITH THE 6.3 ZONING CODE REQUIREMENTS, WHICH GAVE YOU THE RESTRICTIONS ON THAT ZONING, SO THE APPLICANT MUST SATISFY THOSE THINGS WHEN THEY'RE CREATING A NEW DISTRICT.

AS I NOTED, THEY CANNOT CREATE A SITUATION WHERE THEY CAN REQUEST VARIANCES.

YOU CAN'T CREATE YOUR OWN HARDSHIP. SO I DID POINT THAT OUT TO THE COMMISSION.

SO WE WERE REQUESTING THAT THEY INSTEAD OF DOING THE SIX LOTS, WE FELT THE LOTS WOULD BE MORE CONDUCIVE TO THE AREA IF IT WERE TO SATISFY THOSE STANDARDS. AND I ALSO PROVIDED YOU WITH THE LARGEST LOT BEING, YOU KNOW, EXCEEDING OVER 15,000FT² AND MAYBE THAT SMALLER LOT SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN THERE.

BUT ABOVE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TODAY.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. THE APPLICANT IS HERE TO ADDRESS THE BOARD, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

AND WE'LL HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC AND THEN STAFF WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE.

ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SO MOVED. SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND THEN A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SPOOR.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. AT THIS TIME.

THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM IS OPEN. IS THERE ANYONE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? MISS [INAUDIBLE], ARE YOU HERE TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF THIS ITEM? OKAY. WOULD YOU LIKE TO COME TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE? WE'LL BRING YOU THE MIC. WE'LL BRING YOU THE MIC.

AND [INAUDIBLE], YOU LIVE AT 203 EVANS, CORRECT? MIC]. THANK YOU MA'AM. I'VE LIVED THERE FOR 60 YEARS.

[00:05:05]

FOR OVER 60, ACTUALLY. WE HAVE NEVER HAD ANY FLOODING IN OUR BACKYARDS UNTIL WE I WANT TO KNOW IF THEY'RE GOING TO BUILD A HOUSING ADDITION ABOVE US THAT LAND IS HIGHER THAN OURS. EXACTLY WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO? IT TAKES WATER OFF THEIR STREETS, OFF OF THEIR HOUSING SITES.

BUT IT DOES NOT DO ANYTHING FOR OUR BACKYARD BECAUSE IT'S THE BOTTOM OF THE RAISED HOUSE SITE.

THEY RAN A DITCH INSIDE THEIR FENCE LINES, WHICH THE LOW SIDE OF THE DITCH IS EVEN WITHOUT A PROPERTY LINE, AND THAT COMES THROUGH THEIR FENCE INTO OUR BACKYARDS, PROBLEMS. AND I HAVE PICTURES THAT I'VE TAKEN SINCE THEY STARTED AND I WANT YOU TO LOOK TO SEE WHAT MY BACKYARDS LOOK LIKE NOW.

OKAY.

LET'S JUST DO THE COMMENTS.

SO TYPICALLY IN PUBLIC HEARINGS WE JUST HEAR THE COMMENTS OF THE PUBLIC, AND WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL HAVE QUESTIONS, OKAY? DO YOU HAVE ANY OTHER COMMENTS BEFORE WE MOVE ON TO ANYONE ELSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK? LOWER FROM IT'S GOING TO INCREASE IT IF THEY BUILD A HOUSING ADDITION ABOVE US.

GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MS. [INAUDIBLE], IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THIS ITEM.

SECOND. SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. ALL RIGHT. SO I KNOW THESE PICTURES ARE COMING AROUND.

IS THE REQUESTER PRESENT? YES, THE REQUESTER IS PRESENT.

YOU CAN ADDRESS SOME OF THE QUESTIONS REGARDING THAT.

AND THEN WE CAN ALSO TALK ABOUT THE DRAINAGE OF THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY CERTAINLY. YOUR PICTURES, AERIAL SHOTS OF ORANGE STREET.

THEY LOOK FINE BECAUSE THERE'S NO SUNSHINE AND THE STREETS ARE DRY.

EVERYTHING LOOKS FINE. LOOK AT THOSE PICTURES AFTERWARDS.

THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, SO.

ADDRESS THESE CONCERNS, PLEASE? HOW ARE YOU ALL DOING TODAY? OTIS, AT THIS POINT IN THE PROCESS, WE ARE FAR, I WOULD ASSUME, FROM HAVING A DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY.

IS THAT CORRECT? HE WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A DRAINAGE REVIEW AND APPROVAL THROUGH HAMILTON DRAINAGE DISTRICT, WHETHER OR NOT HE NEEDS YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE EVALUATED DURING THE DEVELOPMENT STAGE.

BUT HE CANNOT, OF COURSE OUTFLOW OR, YOU KNOW, MORE FLOW FOR HIS IMPROVEMENT THAN IT WAS PRE-DEVELOPMENT.

SO THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE CALCULATED. AND AS HE STATED, THEY WOULD SHOW THE OUTFALL HERE.

JUST SPEAKING BRIEFLY WITH THE EXPERTS, YOU KNOW, FROM THE AREA WE'VE SEEN, IT'S PRETTY TRUE IN TERMS OF THE DIRECTION OF THE FLOW.

[00:10:03]

CURRENTLY HIGH FALLS AND BEING HIT WITH WORST CASE SCENARIO RUNNING ORANGE TO WORST CASE SCENARIO, IF YOU WERE TO COME NEAR THE STREET AREA.

BUT THAT WOULD BE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF ORANGE, RIGHT? NOT THE OUTSIDE? YES, SIR. OKAY, SO IT SHOULDN'T REACH THE PROPERTY AT THE CORNER OF ORANGE AND REQUIREMENTS. SO THERE'LL BE SIDEWALKS IN THE FRONT, NO DITCHES, EVERYTHING DRAINED TO THE BACK TOWARDS THE AS FAR AS WE KNOW, BACK TO THE RAILROAD TRACKS? THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD TRY TO ACHIEVE HERE.

BECAUSE THOSE PICTURES, THAT'S GOING TO BE AN ISSUE WITH FARRER STREET, BUT OKAY, MS. [INAUDIBLE], YOUR PICTURES ARE VERY COMPELLING.

BUT WHERE WE ARE IN THE PROCESS RIGHT NOW IS TO SIMPLY ALLOW FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF A DEVELOPMENT.

AND AT A FUTURE STAGE, THE DEVELOPER WILL HAVE TO PLAT THE LAND AND SHOW HOW THE PROPERTY DRAINS.

AND WE WOULD RECEIVE ASSURANCES, I SUPPOSE, FROM THE DRAINAGE DISTRICT, THAT IT'S PROPER AND NOT GOING TO FLOOD NEIGHBORS.

SO THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO WANT TO COME BACK WHEN WE GET TO THAT FUTURE STAGE OF PLATTING THE PROPERTY. BUT AT TODAY'S POINT IN THE PROCESS, WE'RE NOT QUITE THERE YET, OKAY? OKAY, OKAY.

IF YOU WANT TO MAKE. I HAVE A QUESTION, I THINK, FOR THE APPLICANT.

IS THERE A REASON WHY YOU ASKED FOR SF-6.3 INSTEAD OF 7.2 OR 10? EVEN, I GUESS, ESPECIALLY KNOWING THAT ONE OF THE LOTS, IF IT'S ZONED AS 6.3, WOULD BE NON-COMPLIANT? WHEN WE DID THE AND ENSURED THAT THAT FAR LEFT LOT SO EACH ONE WOULD BE 71-ISH FOOT WIDE. SO I THINK, I MEAN, IF I HAD TO DO THE 73, IT WOULD MEET THE REQUIREMENTS NOW ON THE FIVE LINES YES. ALL FIVE WOULD BE COMPLIANT? YEAH. OKAY.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WILL.

I MOVE WE APPROVE THE REZONING OF THE APPROXIMATELY 1.69 ACRES FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT, SINGLE FAMILY, 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN 1000 BLOCK OF EAST ORANGE STREET AND FORWARD THIS ITEM TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER CLARK.

SECOND. I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER SPOOR.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? MY ONLY POINT OF DISCUSSION WOULD BE, COULD WE AMEND THE MOTION POTENTIALLY TO BE A REZONE TO SINGLE FAMILY 7.2? OKAY. SO THE MOTION IS AMENDED FROM REFERENCE TO 6.3 TO 7.2. OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE AMENDED MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT.

GOOD LUCK. MS. [INAUDIBLE]. STAY IN TUNE.

BUT YOU CAN CERTAINLY HAVE YOUR PICTURES BACK. I NEVER GOT A RESPONSE.

WELL, THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. AND I WILL SAY THAT THIS PARTICULAR CASE WILL GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AUGUST THE 27TH AT 6:00 PM.

YOU WILL RECEIVE ANOTHER LETTER OF THANK YOU. THANK YOU. CITY COUNCIL MEETING THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ITEM 3. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON ORDINANCE ZONING, APPROXIMATELY 9.458 ACRES, TO COMMERCIAL GENERAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON STATE HIGHWAY 288 AND BRAZORIA COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PID NUMBER 706979. MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A ZONING OF A PROPERTY THAT'S CURRENTLY IN OUR ETJ FOR THE 9.45 ACRES. I WILL SAY THIS IS A PROJECT SITE THAT WE'VE BEEN WORKING ON FOR QUITE A WHILE NOW THAT THEY HAVE ACHIEVED ALL NECESSARY EASEMENTS

[00:15:06]

TO GET ALL OF THE UTILITIES TO THE PROPERTY. WE'VE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO EVALUATE ANY TYPE OF WATER SERVICES AND ALSO CAPACITY ISSUES THROUGHOUT CITY ENGINEER AS PART OF AN ANNEXATION WHICH IS PENDING, THAT WILL GO BEFORE THE COUNCIL ON THE 12TH, AS WELL AS THIS ITEM, WHATEVER YOUR RECOMMENDATION ENDS UP BEING.

FOR THE PROPERTY, AS I STATED, IT IS FOR [INAUDIBLE] AUTO DEALERSHIP.

CURRENTLY, THE SURROUNDING AREA IS LIKE INDUSTRIAL IN TERMS OF THE ZONING OF THE CAR LOTS, AND WE ARE SUGGESTING THE CG GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, IN TERMS OF THE RECOMMENDED ZONING.

SO IT'LL BE BASICALLY ZONING INSTEAD OF RE-ZONING SINCE IT'S OUT IN THE ETJ.

SO AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION THAT'S PENDING, COUNCIL WILL HAVE TO DESIGNATE A ZONING DISTRICT, SO THEY APPLY SIMULTANEOUSLY FOR THE ZONING AS WELL AS THE ANNEXATION.

WE HAVE, OF COURSE, WEIGHED THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES IN TERMS OF IMPACTS.

THERE ARE NO ISSUES THAT WERE NOTED. IT IS ALONG STATE HIGHWAY 288, THE FEEDER ROAD.

SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET ALL THE NECESSARY ACCESS, THINGS CLEARED UP DURING THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.

SO THERE ARE NO REALLY ISSUES, REAL ISSUES THERE.

THEY ARE CURRENTLY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. SO THAT'S SOMETHING WE LOOK FAVORABLY TO IN TERMS OF THEIR EXPANDING TO THIS LOCATION AND SITE.

SO THEY REALLY HAD NO NEGATIVE ISSUES TO PRESENT TO THE COMMISSION REGARDING THIS ZONING.

AS A MATTER OF FORMALITY, WE DID, OF COURSE, NOTIFY EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPERTY AND DULY NOTED THE AD IN THE NEWSPAPER.

THIS ITEM WILL GO BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION UPON YOUR RECOMMENDATION, WHICH STAFF IS SUGGESTING A POSITIVE RECOMMENDATION OF THE ZONING OF THE CG.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF US WE'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THOSE.

OTHER THAN THAT, IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING. ALL RIGHT.

AT THIS TIME, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.

ALTHOUGH THERE WAS A CLOSE TIE THERE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION, INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ALL RIGHT, AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR ITEM ON THE AGENDA? GOING ONCE, GOING TWICE. I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. OKAY, I'M GOING TO GIVE THAT ONE TO MISS SPOOR.

SECOND. AND I'LL GIVE THE SECOND TO COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. ALL RIGHT, MR. SPRIGGS, ANY FURTHER COMMENTS YOU WANT TO? I DO NOT. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I MOVE WE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE ZONING IN APPROXIMATE 9.458 ACRES OF LAND TO THE COMMERCIAL GENERAL DISTRICT ZONING DISTRICT.

AND THAT WE FORWARD THIS ITEM TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AND APPROVAL, CONTINGENT ON COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF THE ANNEXATION PETITION FOR THE SAME TRACT OF LAND.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER ROBERSON.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM 4.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE WINDROSE GREEN SECTION 8 FINAL PLAT LOCATED OFF PARKS EDGE LANE AND NEW DAWN DRIVE.

MR. SPRIGGS. I DID NOT APOLOGIZE FOR YOU GUYS.

I'M NEVER THAT LATE ON YOUR PACKET. AS YOU'VE HEARD, THE NETWORK SYSTEM HERE IS DOWN AND IT CONTINUES TO BE DOWN RIGHT NOW.

SO IT WAS A THIS IS A PLAT 6.47 ACRES, WHICH THE APPLICANTS ARE HOPING TO GAIN FINAL PLAT APPROVAL.

THE CITY ENGINEER DID REVIEW THE PLAT, AND WE HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO WORK BACK AND FORTH OVER THE CELL PHONE TO CLEAR ALL OF THE ITEMS THROUGH THE APPLICANTS, AS YOU SEE NOTED THERE. SO WE'RE RECOMMENDING APPROVAL THAT THIS BE FORWARDED TO COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AND APPROVAL.

ALL RIGHT. EVERYTHING'S BEEN CLEAR. COMMISSIONERS? I MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SHOULD ACCEPT STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THE WINDROSE

[00:20:02]

GREEN SECTION 8 FINAL PLAT, SUBJECT TO FINAL ACTION APPROVAL BY CITY COUNCIL.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HESTON AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM FIVE.

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE ASHLAND STREET.

DEDICATION SECTION 7. MR. SPRIGGS. THANK YOU.

THIS IS A STREET DEDICATION OF SECTION 7 OF ASHLAND.

AS YOU SEE, IT'S SERVING THAT PORTION RIGHT OFF IN WHICH THE APPLICANTS ARE HOPING TO GAIN APPROVAL OF THIS PRELIMINARY PLAN.

AND IT IS A PART OF THE SO WE FORWARDED THE PLAT COMMENTS TO THE CITY ENGINEER, AND THERE WAS JUST SOME MINOR THINGS THAT NEEDED TO BE CORRECTED.

SO SINCE THAT TIME, ALL OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLEARED.

THERE'S A VERSION OF THE STAFF REPORT THAT WE HAVE THERE WITH SOME BLANKS.

UNFORTUNATELY, AS I STATED, WE HAD SOME TECHNICAL ISSUES GOING ON.

BUT ALL OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN CLEARED. MOST OF THEM WERE JUST FACTUAL CHANGES THAT NEEDED TO BE MADE TO THE PLAT.

SO THIS HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL FOR FINAL APPROVAL.

THE AND I'VE MOVE ON TO COUNCIL STREET DEDICATION NUMBER 7.

COMMISSIONERS, WHAT'S YOUR PLEASURE? I MOVE WE APPROVE PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE ASHLAND STREET DEDICATION SECTION 7 SUBJECT TO ANY REQUIRED REFERRAL, AGENCY APPROVALS AND FORWARD TO CITY COUNCIL FOR FINAL ACTION AND CONSIDERATION.

I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND THE SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CLARK.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU. OH, GIVE ME A.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.