Feb 05, 2026 Planning & Zoning Commission

[00:00:01]

OKAY. ARE WE WE HAVE A QUORUM. AND YOU READY TO CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER?

[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]

WELCOME TO THE FEBRUARY 5TH EDITION OF THE CITY OF ANGLETON PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

FIRST ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON JANUARY 5TH,

[1. Discussion and possible action on the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on January 5, 2026.]

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM TWO, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON AN ORDINANCE APPROVING

[2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on an Ordinance, approving an (SUP) Specific Use Permit, within the SF 6.3, Single Family District, allowing for an RV-Recreational Vehicle Temporary Housing for medical purposes, at 202 S. Walker St., Angleton, Texas.]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. COMMISSIONERS, THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN SUP APPLICATION.

WE HAVE LAURA GREEN HERE WHO IS IN A MEDICAL CONDITION WHERE SHE'S REQUESTING APPROVAL OF AN SUP THAT WOULD ALLOW THAT TEMPORARY HOUSING ON THE PROPERTY NOTED HERE AT 202 SOUTH WALKER STREET.

AS I STATED IN THE STAFF SUMMARY, THE APPLICANTS WENT BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL FOR A FEE WAIVER, WHICH WAS GRANTED ON JANUARY THE 13TH. BUT BECAUSE OF THE SUP PROCESS, WE HAVE TO ADVERTISE AND SEND THEM THROUGH THIS PROCESS IN WHICH YOU ARE TO MAKE RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL FOR SUPS SO THAT'S WHY IT'S BEFORE YOU.

STAFF WENT THROUGH THE CRITERIA FOR THE SUP PROCESS.

IF YOU WOULD ROLL DOWN A LITTLE BIT, WE'LL PULL UP THE GRAPHIC IN TERMS OF THE LOCATION, THE 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT THAT YOU SEE THERE.

AND I'LL GO BACK UP TO THE MAP ONE RIGHT THERE.

WHERE YOU SEE THE ARROW WOULD BE THE LOCATION OF THE RV ALONG SOUTH WALKER.

SO STAFF FINDS NO ISSUES WITH THIS. IT'S A REASONABLE REQUEST.

IT'S MORE TIME SENSITIVE THAN THAN ANYTHING ELSE YOU CAN ROLL DOWN.

AS PART OF THE RECOMMENDATION, WE'VE LISTED TWO CONDITIONS OF THE TEMPORARY HOUSING THAT WOULD TIE IT TO THE REQUESTER, AND THEN WE WOULD REEVALUATE IT ONE YEAR FROM THAT DATE, JUST TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY NEEDED REQUESTS FROM THE APPLICANTS AT THAT TIME.

IT WILL COORDINATE THAT THROUGH COUNCIL. SO THAT'S IT.

IT IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN STAFF WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AFTER.

ALL RIGHT. SO AT THIS TIME I WILL, I WILL ACCEPT A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. MOTION BY MISS BIERI. SECOND. SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN.

WE NOW HAVE AN OPEN PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING THIS ITEM.

THERE'S NO ONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON ABOUT THIS ISSUE.

THE LADY ON THE PHONE IS THE APPLICANT. NOT, WITH THIS APPLICANT IS NOT PRESENT.

STAFF IS PRESENTING THIS ITEM. SO AT THIS TIME, I WILL INTRODUCE OUR ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. SECOND. OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER SPOOR AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BIERI.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. AYE. MOTION CARRIES. OKAY. SO ANYONE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS APPLICATION? AND IF NOT, DOES ANYONE HAVE A MOTION THEY WOULD LIKE TO PROPOSE? OH ONE QUESTION. YES, SIR. JUST IS SHE PLANNING TO HOOK THE.

DO WE KNOW IF SHE'S PLANNING TO HOOK THE RV UP TO THE SEWER AND? YEAH, SHE WAS REQUIRED TO, AND IT IS ALREADY CONNECTED. PERFECT. OKAY. GOOD QUESTION.

OKAY. I'M LOOKING FOR HIS, HOW HE WANTS THE RECOMMENDATION.

YEAH. PAGE 12. OH, THERE IT IS. I'M SORRY. PAGE 12.

I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE AND RECOMMENDED THE ORDINANCE TO THE CITY COUNCIL GRANTING THE SUP FOR THE RV TEMPORARY HOUSING FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, PLACEMENT SPECIFIC USE PERMITS SHALL REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 14-103 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE OUTSIDE LICENSE PARK FOR EMERGENCY HOUSING. TWO THE TERM OF THE GRANTING OF THE SUP SPECIFIC TO THIS LAURA GREEN SHALL BE TEMPORARY, EXPIRING ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF THE APPROVAL OF THIS SUP BEING GRANTED TO ALLOW THE APPLICANT SUFFICIENT QUALITY OF LIFE WHILE DEMONSTRATING FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE CITED CITY CODES OF ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS. UPON A ONE YEAR REVIEW, THE CITY MANAGER MAY EXTEND THE APPROVAL OF THE SUP FOR ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY TERM,

[00:05:05]

ORDERING THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY TO BE TERMINATED AND THE RV UNIT REMOVAL.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT, I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIERI AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.

IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ITEM THREE.

[3. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on an Ordinance assigning a Specific Use Permit (SUP) Overlay to an “MH” Zoning District, for property containing approximately 10.646 acres within the Angleton ETJ, into the City Limits, for the Angleton RV Park LLC Facility located at 789 and 799 Anchor Rd./CR 44, Brazoria County, Angleton, TX 77515.]

THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS ALSO A PUBLIC HEARING YOU HAVE BEFORE YOU AND SUP AND ZONING REQUESTS THE MIDDLE FOR THE ANGLETON RV PARKING, WHICH MOST OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH ON COUNTY ROAD 44.

WE RECEIVED THE PETITION REQUESTING ANNEXATION FOR THE PROPERTY DUE TO THE APPLICANT HOPING TO CONNECT TO CITY SEWER AND EVENTUALLY CITY WATER FOR THE FACILITY. AS YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SPRAY FIELDS OUT ALONG THAT INTERSTATE RAMP AS IT APPROACHES COUNTY ROAD 44 OFF OF THE 288 SOUTHBOUND. THE REQUESTER IS AVAILABLE TO THIS THIS AFTERNOON, IN WHICH WE'LL BE ABLE TO FIELD ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. AS PART OF THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION, WE SOMETIMES CAN ASSIGN THE ZONING SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE PETITION FOR ANNEXATION. YOU ARE NOT SUBJECT TO REVIEW OF THE ANNEXATION, BUT YOU ARE A RECOMMENDING BODY IN TERMS OF THE ZONING MAP AMENDMENT.

SO THAT'S WHY THIS IS BEFORE YOU. THIS IS CONTINGENT UPON COUNCIL ACCEPTING THE ANNEXATION ON FEBRUARY THE 10TH, BUT WE WERE PLANNING TO MERGE THE REQUEST FOR THE ZONING LAYER REQUEST THAT YOU SEE HERE FOR THE MOBILE HOME.

I HAVE LISTED THE REQUIREMENTS OF RV PARKS FROM OUR ZONING RESOLUTION.

IF YOU WOULD CLICK NUMBER THREE, PAUL, AND FOLLOW ME IN THE REPORT.

CLICK THAT THREE THERE AND GO DOWN A LITTLE FURTHER.

BASICALLY THEY HAVE 78 RV PADS. AND IT HAS A LITTLE HISTORY IN TERMS OF THE PROPERTY.

BUT HOWEVER, IN TERMS OF THE ANNEXATION, WE WILL BE PRESENTING THE UTILITY SERVICE PLAN TO THE COUNCIL IN WHICH THEY WILL MAKE THE FINAL DECISION BASED ON THE REQUEST IN TERMS OF ALL PUBLIC SERVICES AS IT RELATES TO UTILITIES.

ALSO PD, THEY WOULD GET, OF COURSE, ALL OF THE TRASH SERVICE PLANNING AND ZONING AND ALL OF THE VARIOUS SERVICES THAT WE BRING FROM A PUBLIC SERVICE PERSPECTIVE.

I WILL SAY THAT THE APPLICANT IS NEGOTIATING WITH THE COUNCIL, AS I STATED, IN TERMS OF COMING ON BOARD WITH THE WATER, BECAUSE THEY ARE CURRENTLY UNDER A DIFFERENT SYSTEM.

BUT HOWEVER THAT WOULD BE HANDLED, I THINK, THROUGH THE SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNCIL.

AND WE DON'T KNOW WHERE THAT MIGHT LAND. BUT HOWEVER ON PAGE 25 IS LISTED, I DID PUT THE REQUIREMENTS OF AN RV PARK IN WHICH THEY WILL BE HELD TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS OF LICENSING THAT WE WOULD DO FOR ANY MOBILE HOME OR RV PARK IN TERMS OF THEY HAVE ANNUAL LICENSING REQUIREMENTS AND THEN OTHER INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE LISTED THERE AS WELL.

AND THEN THE ASSOCIATED FEES, THEY ARE REQUIRED TO OF COURSE HAVE A SURETY OF THEIR MAINTENANCE.

WE HAVE LISTED SOME CONCERNS IN TERMS OF THE SITE IN WHICH, YOU KNOW, SOMETIMES AS PART OF SUPS, YOU ALL CAN REQUEST SOME SITE PLAN PROVISIONS OF LANDSCAPING OR ANY THING THAT YOU WOULD REQUIRE IN TERMS OF FENCING OR SCREENING.

STAFF HAS LOOKED AT THAT AND REQUESTED SOME PLANTINGS ALONG THE RIGHT OF WAY AND THEN SOME BOUNDARY FENCING, AS YOU SEE NOTED IN THE RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS THAT WE LISTED.

OTHER THAN THAT THOSE ARE LISTED IN THE ON PAGE 33, IN THE ORDINANCE REQUEST WE LISTED THREE CONDITIONS DEALING WITH THE, THIS BEING SUBJECT TO THE ANNEXATION, AND THEN THEY BE HELD TO THE 78 UNITS, AND THEN SOME FORM OF PRIVACY SCREEN FENCING BE LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST AND EAST PART OF THE BOUNDARY LINES,

[00:10:01]

THAT'S ALL THAT STAFF HAS. THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE ON AUDIO FOR QUESTIONS AND WE WILL BE AVAILABLE THEREAFTER.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR. SPRIGGS. AT THIS TIME I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SO MOVED. SECOND. HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BIERI AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE. AYE, AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW OPEN. THERE'S NO ONE IN THE AUDIENCE TO APPROACH THE PODIUM AND SPEAK ON THIS ISSUE.

WE WILL ASSUME THE APPLICANT ON AUDIO IS OBVIOUSLY IN FAVOR OF THE OF THE PROPOSAL.

SO AT THIS TIME I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SPOOR AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER HESTON.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. PUBLIC HEARING IS NOW CLOSED.

ALL RIGHT. WHAT QUESTIONS DO YOU HAVE FOR MR. SPRIGGS OR THE APPLICANT REGARDING THIS REQUEST? SO I HAVE A QUESTION. BACK, WHAT, 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO, WE REFUSED THE DEVELOPMENT THERE AT THE [INAUDIBLE] LAND.

WE TOLD THEM WE DIDN'T LIKE THEIR LAYOUT. AND THE QUESTION AT THAT TIME, WHICH REMAINS THE QUESTION ABOUT THE [INAUDIBLE] LAND AND EVEN A FUTURE RV PARK SOUTH OF 220 THAT WE WENT AWAY FROM WAS WE DIDN'T HAVE SEWER CAPACITY, AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TAKING, AND PUT IT JUST BLUNTLY, 78 TOILETS INTO OUR SEWER CAPACITY, WHICH WE WOULDN'T ALLOW OVER THERE FOR 250 $300,000 HOMES.

AND NOW WE'RE GOING TO GET 78 RVS. WHAT WE HAVEN'T, HAVE WE OR HAVE WE NOT UPGRADED SEWER CAPACITY TO HANDLE EXTRA? WE STILL HAVE THE SAME CAPACITY AS IT'S SAID FOR THE LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS IN TERMS OF THE AVAILABLE 300 TAPS OR SO. IF YOU WERE TO COUNT EVERYTHING ON OUR NEW DEVELOPMENT MAP THAT HAS GONE THROUGH THE PROCESS AND WAITING FOR CONSTRUCTION OR IN THE PROCESS OF CONSTRUCTION IN TERMS OF THE CAPACITY QUESTIONS, THEY ARE STILL OBLIGATED TO GO THROUGH CALF CAPACITY REQUESTS BEFORE THE CITY JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN ACCOMMODATE.

SO BEFORE COUNCIL ACCEPTS THE ANNEXATION, THOSE THINGS WILL BE IRONED OUT AND ACCEPTED BY THE COUNCIL.

IF IT CAN BE NEGOTIATED. HE DID GO BEFORE A IT'S CALLED A CONCEPT REVIEW BEFORE THE COUNCIL REQUESTING IT.

AND THEY RAISED QUESTIONS. TOLD HIM TO GO BACK, SPEAK WITH THE STAFF, COME UP WITH A PLAN.

BECAUSE AT FIRST HE WAS NOT GOING TO CONNECT TO OUR WATER.

BUT HE WANTED JUST A SEWER TO CORRECT GOING, YOU KNOW, GETTING RID OF THE SPRAY FIELDS, AND HE'LL EXPLAIN WHAT HIS OBJECTIVE WAS THERE.

BUT YOU RAISED LEGITIMATE CONCERNS, AND COUNCIL HAS REVIEWED IT PRELIMINARILY.

AND THE CAPACITY QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED ON TUESDAY, AND WE'LL DEAL WITH THE UTILITY SERVICE PLAN THAT WE'VE DRAFTED UP AND THEN WORK WITH THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION VERSUS WHAT THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING, AND COME COME SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN THERE TO MAKE SURE IT BENEFITS THE CITY.

IT'S NOT JUST JUST HIS SEWER. I MEAN, WELL, IT IS THE SEWER, BUT IF IF I READ THIS RIGHT, HE INTENDS TO TAKE OUT ALL THE AEROBIC SYSTEM, COME ON TO OUR SEWER CAPACITY, EVENTUALLY BUILD A WASHATERIA FOR THOSE PEOPLE.

SO WE'RE ADDING THAT TO IT ALSO. YEAH. LET'S ASK THAT QUESTION SO THAT WE'LL MAKE SURE THAT'S WHAT THE OBJECTIVE IS.

BUT ANY ADDITIONS TO THE SITE NEEDS TO BE HANDLED IN THE SUP.

SO IF THERE'S A WASHETERIA PROPOSED THAT IS NOT IN HERE AND HE CAN ANSWER THAT QUESTION IF IT'S AVAILABLE ALREADY.

I DO KNOW THAT THEY HAVE A COMMON BUILDING, BUT I THINK THAT MIGHT BE A SMALL OFFICE.

WELL, MAYBE I JUST MISREAD IT BECAUSE I SAW SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

YEAH, THE IDEA WAS TO TAKE OUT THE SPRAY, THE AEROBIC SYSTEM AND BE ABLE TO UTILIZE THAT PROPERTY.

AND I READ. AGAIN I'M NOT. HELLO, THIS IS BOB ON THE PHONE.

I HAVE NO PLANS OF OPENING A WASHATERIA ON ON THE LAND WHERE THE SPRAY FIELD IS.

[00:15:03]

I THINK THAT'S WHAT IT IS. YOU SAY YOU'RE NOT PLANNING TO PUT IT WHERE THE SPRAY FIELD IS. ARE YOU PLANNING TO PUT A WASHETERIA ANYWHERE ON THE PROPERTY? NO, I ALREADY I ALREADY HAVE A SMALL, SMALL WASHETERIA ON THE PROPERTY.

I DID NOT PLAN TO ENHANCE OR ADD ANY WASHETERIA CAPACITY ANYWHERE IN MY PROPERTIES.

GOTCHA. CAN I ASK HOW OLD YOUR SYSTEM IS? MY MY SEPTIC SYSTEM.

THE REASON I. YEAH, I'LL EXPLAIN WHY, BUT HOW OLD YOUR SEPTIC SYSTEM CURRENTLY.

IT'S LIKE FIVE YEARS OLD. IT'S FAIRLY NEW. I WOULD SAY BRAND NEW, BUT NOT TO THE POINT WHERE IT'S FALLING APART EITHER.

NO, NO, NO, IT'S IT'S PERFECTLY RUNNING. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE SPRAY FIELD.

IF I MEAN, THE WAY I READ IT, A LARGE PART OF THE IMPETUS, IF NOT THE IMPETUS FOR DOING THIS, IS TO GET RID OF THE SPRAY FIELD. WHY WASN'T IT PUT SOMEWHERE ELSE WHEN YOU WERE CONSTRUCTING? WHY WAS IT PUT IN A REALLY VISIBLE PLACE? I'M NOT SURE.

I PURCHASED THIS PROPERTY FROM FROM THE DEVELOPER WHO BUILT IT, AND I.

I AGREE THAT SPRAY FIELD IS PROBABLY NOT, IT'S NOT DESIGNED ADEQUATELY.

SHOWING ON FRONTAGE ROAD ROAD 288 TRUSTEE OF ANGLETON.

SO I'M TRYING TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT TO CLEAN THAT LAND UP FOR THE BETTER OF THE COMMUNITY.

ANY ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT ON THAT LAND AFTER YOU REMOVE THE SPRAY FIELD? I HAVE NO ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNED AT THE MOMENT.

YOU KNOW, IF SOMETHING ARISES, THEN WE'LL NEED TO BRING IT IN FRONT OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

OBJECTIVE RIGHT NOW IS REMOVE THE SPRAY FIELD TO CLEAR THAT LAND AND ENHANCE THE LOOK OF THE WHOLE AREA AND PROPERTY AND CITY OF ANGLETON.

I JUST HAD A LOT OF COMPLAINTS ON HOW BAD IT LOOKS ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD.

ARE YOU UNDER ENFORCEMENT WITH THE COUNTY CURRENTLY? YES. YES, YES. I'M IN COMPLIANCE WITH EVERYTHING WITH BRAZORIA COUNTY.

OKAY, OKAY. SORRY. WHEN I SAY UNDER AND THEY HAVEN'T WRITTEN YOU A TICKET OR A NOTICE OF VIOLATION. OH, NO. NO. NO VIOLATIONS. OKAY. IS THERE BEAUTIFICATION THAT CAN BE DONE TO GET RID OF THE EYESORE? I MEAN, BUSHES AND. WELL. OR. OH, SORRY. YOU NEED A GRASS.

RIGHT. BUT, I MEAN, COULD YOU NOT PUT A HEDGEROW OR OR.

YOU COULD DO A DRIP SYSTEM? HAVE YOU CONSIDERED THAT INSTEAD OF HOOKING UP TO THE SEWER? NO, I WANT TO OPEN THAT LAND UP AS WELL. FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.

FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT. SOMETHING THAT CAN GENERATE. SOMETHING THAT CAN GENERATE TAX DOLLARS FOR THE FOR THE CITY AND AND HOPEFULLY PROFIT FOR ME AS WELL.

BUT THAT'S A LONGER TERM PLAN FOR THAT KIND OF DEVELOPMENT.

YEAH. I HAVEN'T THOUGHT THROUGH EXACTLY WHAT WE'RE THINKING RIGHT NOW.

BUT WE WE DO WE DO WANT TO TO EXPAND THAT LAND.

YOU KNOW, AND AND IT'S GOING TO BE BASED ON US STUDYING THE AREA AND TALKING WITH THE CITY OF ANGLETON, AS WELL, OF WHAT ARE THE NEEDS FOR THE CITY. SO WE CAN WE CAN MAKE SURE WE'RE WE'RE HELPING THE COMMUNITY GROW AROUND US.

I THINK IT'S FAIR TO SAY THAT IF THIS IS GRANTED, I WOULD LOOK UNFAVORABLY UPON AN EXPANSION OF THE OF THE PARK BECAUSE NOW IT LOOKS LIKE YOU'RE TRYING TO DO A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PIECEMEAL AND JUST JUST THROWING THAT OUT THERE.

SO YOU LET I LET YOU KNOW BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT TO KIND OF EAT AN ELEPHANT BY INCHES OVER HERE.

IT'S ONE THING TO TAKE IN THE EXISTING PARK AND THEN TALK ABOUT, I GUESS LIKE A STRIP CENTER OR STORAGE AREA OR SOMETHING.

BUT IT'S DIFFERENT IF YOU'RE JUST PLANNING TO ADD MORE RV SPACES, BECAUSE THAT'S I THINK THAT'LL RUN INTO A LOT MORE ROADBLOCKS.

AND YEAH, NO, I WOULDN'T I WOULDN'T ADD MORE RV SPACES.

OKAY. THAT WILL COME BACK TO THE COMMISSION AS WELL.

YEAH. AND AGAIN, MY INTENTION IS WORK WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM, THE CITY OF ANGLETON OF WHAT IS THE COMMUNITY NEEDS.

RIGHT. I'M I'M NOT I'M I'M CERTAINLY NOT. I DON'T WANT TO.

I SAW THERE AS WELL. RIGHT. JUST SOMETHING THAT'S IN NEED FOR THE COMMUNITY IS WHAT I WANT TO WHAT I WANT TO BUILD THERE.

DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? I WAS GOING TO MAKE A COMMENT ABOUT THE CAPACITY ON THE SEWER.

BUT YOUR QUESTION IT'S SO THE RVS IS LIKE IT'S SIX RVS TO EQUAL ONE THREE BEDROOM HOUSE BASICALLY WHEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT CAPACITY.

SO IT IS A LOT LESS LIKE DRAW ON OR USE OF THE CAPACITY.

ALTHOUGH IN MY EXPERIENCE WITH THE COUNTY, THOSE SYSTEMS ARE TYPICALLY A LITTLE UNDER-DESIGNED BECAUSE OF THE CHANGES THAT WE'VE SEEN IN RVS OVER THE PAST 20 YEARS. SO, I MEAN, THERE IS THERE IS A PUBLIC GOOD IN GETTING THIS ON THE SEWER BEFORE IT FAILS BECAUSE I'VE SEEN THEM FAIL AND WHEN AN RV PARK FAILS. IT'S IT'S MORE THAN JUST LITTLE EYESORE FROM THE SPRAY HEADS.

[00:20:05]

OKAY THIS JUST SO I'M CLEAR, WHAT SPECIFICALLY THE ISSUE THAT IS BEFORE US IS IF ANNEXATION IS TO OCCUR, WE ARE SAYING YAY OR NAY TO A SPECIAL USE PERMIT.

THAT WOULD BE AN OVERLAY OF BASICALLY MANUFACTURED HOUSING.

YES. OKAY. AND THEN WHEN HE GETS READY TO MARKET IT FOR COMMERCIAL, HE'LL PARCEL OFF THE FRONTAGE ALONG WITH HIS OTHER PROPERTY AND REZONE THAT TO A COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. AND THAT REZONING WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK TO US BECAUSE IT WOULD GET PULLED OUT OF THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND MADE LIKE COMMERCIAL GENERAL.

RIGHT. OR ANY REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SUP WOULD COME BACK HERE ALSO.

OKAY. I HAVE A SMALL SUGGESTION ON THE SUP JUST ON THE LANGUAGE.

RIGHT NOW WE'VE GOT INSTALL A PRIVACY FENCE OR SCREEN WALL SHALL BE INSTALLED.

IT SHOULD PROBABLY BE INSTALLED AND BE MAINTAINED BECAUSE THAT'S SOMETHING ELSE WE'VE HAD AN ISSUE WITH.

NOW OF COURSE WITH THE CURRENT OWNER NECESSARILY.

BUT THESE THINGS DO TEND TO CHANGE HANDS. AND WHAT WE DON'T WANT IS THE THE FENCE TO FALL DOWN IN A HURRICANE AND HURRICANE, THEN WAIT A YEAR BEFORE IT GETS BACK UP. THAT'S REASONABLE.

WE'LL PUT IN MAINTAINED. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT.

WOULD ANYONE LIKE TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION? CAN I ASK ONE MORE QUESTION? I'M SO SORRY. WHAT IS IT? IF IT WAS TO BE ANNEXED WITHOUT OUR RECOMMENDATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT IN PLACE, WHAT IS THE DEFAULT? WHAT WOULD IT BE ZONED? IT REMAINS UNKNOWN AS JUST A HOLDING DISTRICT.

OKAY. BUT THIS SORT OF HELPS US COMPLETE A STEP.

OKAY. I WAS DEALING WITH REQUIREMENTS FOR [INAUDIBLE], AND I HAD TO RE PUBLISH IT.

SO WHAT I DID WAS I WORKED WITH HIM TO COMBINE THE REQUEST AS A DUAL REQUEST, BECAUSE IT WORKS BETTER IF YOU ASSIGN THE DISTRICT AT THE TIME OF THE ANNEXATION.

RIGHT. OTHERWISE, HE WOULD HAVE BEEN COMING BACK THE NEXT TWO MONTHS TO DO THAT VERY SAME THING, JUST TO APPLY A DISTRICT. SO IF I COULD, MOST OF THE TIME I WILL DO THEM AT THE SAME TIME.

I RECOMMEND THEY BE DONE AT THE SAME TIME. SO DO WE THEN MAKE ARE WE JUST DOING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BASICALLY INFORMATION GATHERING AND ADDING OUR OWN COMMENTS FOR COUNCIL'S BENEFIT? OR DO YOU ACTUALLY NEED A MOTION AND ACTION ON A SPECIAL USE PERMIT? RIGHT NOW, YOUR RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE FOR COUNCIL TO APPROVE THE ASSIGNING OF THE SUP WITH THE OVERLAY OVER MH WITH THOSE CONDITIONS, AND THAT ANNEXATION SUBJECT TO THE SUCCESSFUL ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY.

OKAY. THAT'S YOUR RECOMMENDATION. ARE YOU READY FOR MOTION? I MOVE THAT COUNCIL ISSUE A SPECIAL USE PERMIT WITH THE MH OVERLAY SUBJECT TO SUCCESSFUL ANNEXATION. YES, MA'AM, AND THE CONDITIONS.

AND THE OVERLAY SUP MUST CONTAIN ALL CONDITIONS SET FORTH BY STAFF WITH THE ADDITION OF COMMISSIONER HESTON'S LANGUAGE.

CORRECT. AND WE HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.

SECOND. SECOND. BY COMMISSIONER HESTON. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. ALRIGHT.

AND THAT CONCLUDES OUR AGENDA AND WE ARE ADJOURNED.

THANK YOU ALL. THANK YOU.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.