13. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on Ordinance No. 20260210-013 approving an (SUP) Specific Use Permit, within the SF 6.3, Single Family District, allowing for an RV- Recreational Vehicle Temporary Housing for medical purposes, at 202 South Walker Street, Angleton, Texas.

[13. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on Ordinance No. 20260210-013 approving an (SUP) Specific Use Permit, within the SF 6.3, Single Family District, allowing for an RV- Recreational Vehicle Temporary Housing for medical purposes, at 202 South Walker Street, Angleton, Texas. ]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 20260210013 APPROVING AN SCP OR SPECIFIC USE PERMIT WITHIN THE SF 6.3 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT ALLOWING FOR AN RV RECREATIONAL VEHICLE.

TEMPORARY HOUSING FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES AT 202 SOUTH WALKER STREET, ANGLETON, TEXAS.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR SCP RELATED TO ADDRESS 202 SOUTH WALKER STREET. AND YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH LAURA GREEN'S REQUEST FOR THE SUPP.

AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE REPORT, IN JANUARY, YOU APPROVED THE WAIVER OF THE FEES FOR THE SGP APPLICATION.

WE DULY POSTED THE REQUEST AND APPLICATION AS PART OF THE PROCESS IN WHICH IT WAS TAKEN BEFORE

[00:10:02]

THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN THEIR FEBRUARY MEETING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE SP.

THEY HELD PUBLIC HEARING AND AS YOU SEE IT WAS, OF COURSE, APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND RECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL. SO WE HAVE ADVERTISED IT SENT NOTIFICATION TO EVERYONE WITHIN 200FT OF THE PROPERTY.

AND WE ARE ASKING THAT COUNCIL WOULD CONSIDER THIS EMERGENCY HOUSING UNDER THE SP FOR THE MEDICAL REASONS NOTED FOR THIS REQUEST WITHIN THAT 6.3 ZONING DISTRICT. SO THERE ARE TWO CONDITIONS WHICH WOULD LIMIT THE TIME FOR THE UNIT AND OF COURSE, STAFF WILL COORDINATE THAT. AND IF THERE'S A NEED TO CONTINUE IT, THAT WILL BE BROUGHT BEFORE THE CITY MANAGER FOR APPROVAL.

AND THAT WAY WE CAN ACCOMMODATE ACCOMMODATE ANY REQUESTS AT THAT TIME.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION. AND SECOND TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION.

ONE MORE TIME. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION. MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. MOTION AND SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ALL RIGHT. COUNCIL, ANY DISCUSSION ON THIS OR YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SP 20260210013. SECOND.

MOTION BY COUNCILWOMAN DANIEL. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN SARTIN.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU. NUMBER 14. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON ORDINANCE NUMBER 20260210.

[14. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on Ordinance No. 20260210-014 granting the voluntary petition to annex approximately 10.646 acres into the City Limits and assigning an “MH” Zoning District/SUP, Specific Use Permit Overlay, originally within the Angleton ETxtraterritorial Jurisdiction, for the Angleton Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park LLC Facility located at 789 and 799 Anchor Road/County Road 44, Brazoria County, Angleton, TX 77515. ]

DASH 014, GRANTING THE VOLUNTARY PETITION TO ANNEX APPROXIMATELY 10.646 ACRES INTO THE CITY LIMITS AND ASSIGNING AN MH ZONING DISTRICT SP SPECIFIC USE PERMIT OVERLAY ORIGINALLY WITHIN THE ANGLETON EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION FOR THE ANGLETON RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARK, LLC FACILITY LOCATED AT SEVEN, EIGHT NINE AND 799 ANCHOR ROAD, COUNTY ROAD 44, BRAZORIA COUNTY.

ANGLETON, TEXAS 77515. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS IS A REQUEST FOR AN SCP SPECIFIC USE PERMIT FOR THE RV PARK.

AS YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH ANGLETON RV PARK. THEY DID COME BEFORE THE PLANNING.

I'M SORRY, BEFORE THE COUNCIL REQUESTING A CONCEPT REVIEW.

AS YOU RECALL, WE DID HAVE SOME PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIONS ON THE REQUEST SPECIFICALLY RELATED TO SEWER VERSUS WATER SERVICES FROM THE CITY BEING REQUESTED. SO THE CONSIDERATION OF THE ANNEXATION WAS SUBMITTED BY PETITION, AND WE HAVE POSTED IT IN COMPLIANCE AS DIRECTED BY LEGAL. THEY HAVE 78, 78 RV PADS CURRENTLY ON THE FACILITY.

WE HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME ATTACHMENTS IN TERMS OF DOCUMENTATION THAT WOULD COVER THE SERVICE AGREEMENT, WHICH WILL HAVE A LITTLE DISCUSSION ON THIS EVENING WITH THE APPLICANT.

ALSO IN THE ATTACHMENTS WOULD BE THE CRIME STATS FOR THE FACILITY PROVIDED BY PD.

IN WHICH IF THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS ON THAT, WE'LL BE GLAD TO ADDRESS THOSE CONCERNS.

AS PART OF THE RV PROCESS OF ANNEXATION, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO ASSIGN A ZONING DISTRICT AS PART OF ANNEXATION.

SO WHEN WE ADVERTISE IT, WE ADVERTISE IT AS SUCH TO ALLOW FOR THE RV PARK AS AN SCP WITHIN THE MH DISTRICT.

SO WE ADVERTISED IT AND ALSO SET THE PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO GIVE WEIGHT TO THE REZONING OR THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY TO SUCH WHICH WHICH WOULD BE RV WITHIN THE MH DISTRICT. AS YOU LOOK AT THE USE CHART CHART WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE, IT'S THE ONLY DISTRICT THAT WOULD HOUSE AN RV FACILITY.

SO THAT WAS THE DISTRICT IN WHICH WE HAD TO REQUEST THE ZONING OF.

SO THE PLANNING COMMISSION ONLY REVIEWED IT IN REGARDS TO THE ZONING OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH IS CONTINGENT UPON SUCCESSFUL ANNEXATION, WHICH IS YOUR ACTION TONIGHT TO CONSIDER THE ANNEXATION, TO CONSIDER THE ZONING DISTRICT, AS NOTED, TO CONSIDER THE UTILITY SERVICE PLAN IN WHICH WE HAVE ATTACHED FOR YOUR REVIEW.

[00:15:06]

IT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY LEGAL AS YOU KNOW, PUBLIC WORKS AS WELL AS THE CITY ENGINEER HAS BEEN INVOLVED WITH THE REVIEW OF THE REQUEST FOR UTILITIES. AND IN OUR LAST DISCUSSION WITH YOU, THE QUESTION WAS THE DURATION OF COMING ON INTO CITY CITY SERVICES IN TERMS OF WATER, AS YOU KNOW, THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY WAS ONLY REQUESTING THE SEWER TO GET RID OF THE SPRAY FIELDS, AS YOU RECALL. BUT HOWEVER AT THE ADVICE OF STAFF THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE WATER WAS A CONCERN, AND THE TIMELINESS OF THAT WAS TALKED ABOUT IN YOUR REVIEW OF THAT CONCEPT PLAN WHERE, WHERE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING SOME FLEXIBILITY THERE TO GIVE TIME. UNDER HIS CURRENT SITUATION, HOWEVER SPEAKING WITH FINANCE, PUBLIC WORKS AND STAFF, OUR RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL WAS TWO YEARS.

LAST DISCUSSIONS WITH THE APPLICANT. IT RAISED TO A LEVEL OF THREE YEARS POSSIBLE CONNECTION, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL COME BEFORE YOU AND LET YOU KNOW WHERE HE LANDED.

WITH HIS RECOMMENDATION ON THE WATER SERVICE CONNECTION WITH THE RV TAPS.

WE'LL ALSO DISCUSS WITH THE APPLICANT THE WEIGHT ON OUR CURRENT SERVICES, BECAUSE RVS, OF COURSE, WOULD NOT BE THE SAME LEVEL OF TAPS THAT WOULD BE NEEDED FOR A SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT AS WELL. ALSO, AS PART OF THE ANNEXATION, WE'RE BRINGING IN POSSIBILITY OF OTHER SERVICES, SUCH AS ANYTHING THAT WE DO FROM PARTS TO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PERMITS, ENFORCEMENT, POLICING TRASH PICKUP. ALL OF THOSE THINGS ARE LISTED IN THE SERVICE AGREEMENT.

AND THEN AS PART OF THIS APPROVAL, THEY WOULD BE OBLIGATED TO SATISFY OUR REQUIREMENTS FOR LICENSING OF AN RV PARK.

SO OUR FEE SCHEDULE DOES INCLUDE THAT A CERTAIN NUMBER OF DOLLARS PER UNIT AND I THINK A BASE FEE OF $50 FOR THE FACILITY.

SO ALL OF THAT IS WRITTEN INTO THE AGREEMENT AND THE ORDINANCE.

I WILL TAKE A STEP BACK FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN WE'LL COME BACK, LET THE APPLICANT SPEAK AND POSSIBLY ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE. OKAY. MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. MOTION. AND SECOND, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. LUPE VALDEZ WORKED FOR THE CITY. I'M NOT OPPOSED TO GIVING THEM WATER AND SEWER.

ONE OF THE REASONS I WANTED TO ADD THE THE CRIME STATS FOR THAT, FOR THAT PARTICULAR PLACE IS BECAUSE LOOK AT OUR OUR DEVELOPMENT MAP AND SEE ALL THESE NEW THINGS THAT WE'VE ADDED TO THE CITY.

WE HAVEN'T ADDED ANY MORE BUILDINGS SO THAT THAT'S THAT'S MY ONLY THING.

WE ANNEX THEM, THEY'RE GOING TO GET POLICE PROTECTION.

SO I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU ALL TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM.

STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION. COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. MOTION AND SECOND. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE'RE NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

ALL RIGHT, LET'S HAVE A DISCUSSION. SO I THOUGHT THAT THE I THOUGHT THAT COORDINATING THE THE BILLING FOR THE SEWER WITHOUT THE WATER WAS GOING TO BE CUMBERSOME.

THAT WAS THAT WAS THE DISCUSSION THAT WE THAT WE HAD PRIOR.

AND WE'RE TALKING ABOUT WHEN AND WHEN WAS THE WHEN WAS THIS LAST BROUGHT BEFORE US? I CAN'T REMEMBER NOVEMBER. NOVEMBER WAS THE MEETING I MISSED.

I MEAN. I PERSONALLY DON'T SEE AN INSTANCE JUST LOOKING AT THE, AT THE, THE HURDLES THAT THE CITY IS GOING TO HAVE TO GO THROUGH. BECAUSE REALLY EITHER WE'RE HAVING TO CHECK UP ON THIS CONSTANTLY ASSIGN ASSIGN A BASE RATE TO THEM FOR SEWER. AND HOPE THAT THAT COVERS IT. OR WE'RE ASKING THEM TO TO

[00:20:01]

ACCEPT ACCEPT THE WATER CONNECTION AS THEY TAP INTO THE SEWER AT THE SAME TIME.

OKAY. YOU SAID NOBODY HERE FROM. NO. OKAY.

SO YOU DIDN'T WANT TO SPEAK? HE WAS WAITING FOR HIS OPPORTUNITY.

THAT'S WHAT I HAD SAID IN THE OPENING. THAT. I HAVE A QUESTION.

CAN YOU GO TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE? I WATCHED THE PNC MEETING, AND I SAW.

I HEARD YOU SAID YOU WERE ONLY HALF FULL RIGHT NOW.

CORRECT. SO YOU HAVE 79 PAD SITES, BUT YOU'RE ONLY USING ABOUT 35? YES. THAT'S CORRECT, 78. I'M ONLY USING ABOUT HALF OF THEM.

ARE YOU PLANNING TO EXPAND IT AND AND FILL THEM ALL UP, OR ARE YOU TRYING TO CHANGE DIRECTION? WHAT ARE YOU WHAT'S YOUR PLAN FOR THIS? THIS PROPERTY? WELL, RV PARK, I WAS HOPING TO GET IT FILLED SO I CAN MAKE MAKE MONEY OFF OF IT, BUT SINCE I BOUGHT IT, I'VE BEEN HOVERING AROUND THE 50% CAPACITY. SO I'M HOPEFUL THAT WITH THE ENHANCEMENTS I'VE MADE OF MAKING THE PARK LOOK NICE, I WILL GET MORE MORE CLIENTS, ESPECIALLY AS INTEREST RATES DROP AND THERE'S MORE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN BRAZORIA COUNTY.

DO YOU OWN THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY TO IS THIS WHAT WE'RE ANNEXING AS WELL? NO, I DO NOT. JUST THIS PIECE HERE. CORRECT. RIGHT.

SO THIS IS STILL SOMEBODY ELSE. THAT'S SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROPERTY.

OKAY. BUT YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT, I THINK, IN THE PNC, YOU MENTIONED SOMETHING ABOUT COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

YEAH. FOR THE 703 590. YEAH. THAT RIGHT THERE.

YEAH, POTENTIALLY. I WANT TO WORK WITH THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP ON WHAT ARE THE NEEDS FOR THIS COMMUNITY.

BUT THAT IS A THOUGHT LONGER TERM THAT I'D LIKE TO INVEST INTO A PROJECT HERE.

AND THEN CURRENTLY YOU DON'T WANT WATER SERVICE.

IS THAT UNDERSTAND? THAT'S THAT'S CORRECT SIR.

YOU'RE JUST WANTING TO PAY FOR SEWER. THAT'S CORRECT SIR.

WOULD THERE EVER BE A POINT WHERE YOU WANT TO TIE INTO THE WATER LINE? YES. IN THE FUTURE, I WOULD LIKE TO. ON THE EXISTING PROPERTY.

CORRECT. I DON'T HAVE THE CAPITAL NOW TO BE ABLE TO TIE INTO IT.

OKAY. HEY, CHIEF, I HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

OR I CALL IT EITHER YOU OR WHOEVER HAS THE DATA.

PARSONS MIGHT HAVE IT. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE CALLS THAT YOU'VE RECEIVED HERE.

YOU SAID 50% WERE NON-EMERGENCY, 26% WERE 911 CALLS.

THE CALLS FOR SERVICE. HOW MUCH IS THAT PD OR IS IT FOR FIRE AND EMS? IF YOU HAD A BREAKDOWN BETWEEN THE TWO, ALL OF THAT IS SIR.

YEAH. HE SAID IT'S IN THE REPORT. OTIS SAID IT'S IN THE REPORT.

BUT THAT THAT THAT ALL THAT IS THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT STATS.

THEY HAVE A CRIME ANALYST THAT GAVE US ALL THOSE STATS, BUT THAT'S THAT'S ALL SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT.

WE WILL GO OUT THERE IF THEY NEED BACKUP. YEAH.

OTIS, WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS IN THE REPORT, I'M STILL ASKING FOR CLARIFICATION BECAUSE IT SAYS BOTH EMS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT.

16 REPORTS WERE GENERATED FOR SERVICE. I WOULD LIKE TO UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH OF THAT IT SAYS 50% WERE NOT EMERGENCY.

DOES THAT MEAN WHAT IS A NON-EMERGENCY? I DON'T THINK HE WOULD KNOW THAT.

WE'D HAVE TO WE'D HAVE TO GET WITH THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO GET SPECIFICS, BECAUSE ALL THIS CAME FROM THE DATA IS FROM THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT. I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT ON THE PD. YES, SIR. JUST THE PD BY ITSELF.

THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND. SO I NEED THAT INFORMATION.

I MEAN, I MEAN, WHAT WHAT ONE CALL IS, IS MORE THAN WHAT WE'VE DONE.

WE'VE DONE OUT THERE. AND THEN YOU'RE NOT ONLY TALKING ABOUT CALLS, YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IF WE GET A CASE, THAT CASE HAS TO GO TO A DETECTIVE. THAT DETECTIVE HAS TO WORK THAT CASE THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE TAKING AWAY FROM CITIZENS.

THESE AREN'T ROOFTOPS, IN MY OPINION. YOU'RE TAKING AWAY FROM OUR CITIZENS RIGHT NOW THAT LIVE IN THE CITY.

I'M NOT OPPOSED TO THE MAN GETTING WATER AND SEWER AT ALL.

HOW LONG HAVE YOU OWNED THE PROPERTY? FOR YEARS.

WHAT IMPROVEMENTS HAVE YOU MADE TO IT IN FOUR YEARS? I'VE. I'VE ADDED A DOG PARK, A PLAYGROUND. JUST MAKE SURE MY ROADS ARE NICE AND STURDY.

[00:25:06]

ADDED FENCING AROUND THE FRONT FRONTAGE. CHANGE THE SIGNS.

OKAY? HAVE YOU HAD ISSUES WITH YOUR TENANTS IN THAT LOCATION? NO, NOT MANY, JUST SOMETIMES, YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD SOME LIKE BREAK INS, PEOPLE USING OUR TRASH CAN, FOR EXAMPLE. THOSE TYPE OF INCIDENTS.

BUT NOTHING. NOTHING MAJOR, THANK GOD. OKAY.

WHERE IS YOUR CURRENT WELL LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY.

IT'S CLOSE TO THE ROAD, ISN'T IT? CORRECT. SO YOU'RE NOT HAVING YOU'RE NOT HAVING TO TRAVERSE CLEAN ACROSS THE PROPERTY TO TIE INTO YOUR EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE. SO YOU GOT WHAT, 50FT OF WATER LINE YOU GOT TO RUN FROM THE FROM THE LINE? MAYBE. I DON'T KNOW THE MATH AROUND IT. I MEAN, I CAN SEE IT RIGHT HERE ON THE MAP.

IT DIDN'T LOOK THAT FAR TO ME. THE THE REASON THAT I BRING THIS UP IS BECAUSE YOU'VE GOT AN EXISTING LINE THERE AND YOU'VE ALSO GOT YOUR. WELL, SO IT'S NOT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A DIFFICULT TASK TO SET A METER AND RUN SOME LINE TO THAT, TO THAT EXISTING WELL LINE AND TIE INTO THAT.

UNDERSTOOD. HOWEVER, I'M AT 50% CAPACITY AND AND A RECURRING WATER CHARGE IS AN ADDITIONAL OPERATIONAL EXPENSE.

I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO HAVE SOME TIME SO I CAN INCREASE MY OCCUPANCY, GET INTO A MODEL WHERE I CAN TIE IN AND BE ABLE TO PAY ALL MY BILLS ON TIME. I UNDERSTAND. THE THING IS, YOUR REQUEST IS SOMETHING THAT WE WOULDN'T.

I DON'T FEEL LIKE WE WOULD NORMALLY APPROVE, AND BECAUSE OF THAT, IT CREATES A LITTLE BIT OF A PROBLEM.

YOU KNOW, THERE'S NOT I DON'T I DON'T SEE THAT COMMISSIONER SPORER ASKED VERY GOOD QUESTIONS AT THE BEGINNING OF PNC, AND IT WAS VERY CONSISTENT WITH, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE BEEN VERY HARD ON PUTTING NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN CERTAIN AREAS. AND WHY WOULD WE BE ANY DIFFERENT TO THIS? ALTHOUGH THIS IS ALREADY EXISTING, IT'S ALREADY THERE.

I THINK THAT'S YOUR DIFFERENCE. BUT WE'RE ALREADY PRETTY TIGHT ON WATER AND SEWER RIGHT NOW.

SO I WAS GOING TO ASK JOHN OR OTIS OR SOMEBODY WHO WANTS TO GET UP HERE AND GIVE ME THE ANSWER, BUT WHAT IS OUR CAPACITY LIKE ON THE SEWER SIDE? I KNOW WE'VE SINCE. FOUND. WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT EXTRA CAPACITY ON THE WATER, BUT NOT MUCH.

WHERE ARE WE AT? ON THE SEWER? I THINK THAT'S THE ISSUE BEFORE US AT THE MOMENT.

SEWER. YOU HAVE YOU HAVE SUFFICIENT CAPACITY.

THE LIFT STATION WAS PUT IN RIGHT THERE AT COUNTY ROAD 220.

AND I THINK THAT'S COUNTY ROAD 288. THE OLD ROAD THAT WAS PUT IN FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THIS AREA AND THAT IS PART OF THAT AREA. THE IMPACT FEE IT'D BE EASY TO FIGURE OUT WE'VE GOT CALCULATION CONVERSIONS TO CALCULATE BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO HAVE THE SAME WATER DRAW AS A HOUSE.

RIGHT. BECAUSE YOU DON'T HAVE MOST OF THEM DON'T HAVE WASHERS DRYERS, YOU KNOW, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

YOU DON'T HAVE AS MUCH COOKING. YOU DON'T HAVE THE THE BATHS AND THE HOT WATER RUNNING AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

THE ONLY THING THAT THAT I HAVE EXPRESSED, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE IS IT'S EXTREMELY DIFFICULT FOR SUSY TO CALCULATE AND TO GO GET THE WATER READINGS TO COME UP WITH THE BILL FOR THE RETURN RATES.

THE CURRENT WAY THAT YOU BUILD YOUR YOUR RESIDENCE IS IT'S A PERCENTAGE OFF OF THE WATER USAGE.

CORRECT. SO THAT'S HOW YOU CALCULATE THE SEWER USAGE.

SO WE'LL HAVE TO COME UP WITH SOME IDEA OF WHAT THAT THAT USAGE IS ON A BASE LEVEL.

BUT YOU HAVE TO VERIFY AND VALIDATE THAT EVERY SO OFTEN.

RIGHT. BECAUSE AT THAT POINT YOU'RE JUST SELLING FREE WATER. THE OTHER PROBLEM THAT I HAVE IS, YOU KNOW, NOT SAYING ANYTHING GOING ON RIGHT NOW, BUT IF THERE IS A DISAGREEMENT.

[00:30:03]

HIS WELL IS PRIVATE. YOU HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO GO ON HIS PRIVATE WELL AND STOP THE PRODUCTION OF WATER TO WHERE IF THERE IS SOMEBODY THAT DOESN'T PAY THEIR WATER AND SEWER BILL, YOU TURN THE WATER OFF.

THE SEWER STOPS TOO. THE ONLY THING YOU CAN DO AT THIS POINT IS PLUG THE SEWER LINE.

BUT THE WATER STILL GOING, CREATING A POTENTIAL ISSUE WITH PEOPLE WANTING TO USE THEIR WATER.

WITH NOWHERE FOR THE WATER TO GO. OKAY. THE WELLS IN THE FRONT.

THE DISTRICT. THE DISTRIBUTION LINE IS RIGHT AT THE WELL.

IT. YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND HE WANTS TO DO THAT, BUT WHEN YOU ACCEPT THE THE SEWER, IT GETS RID OF THE THE FILL LINE OUT THERE, ALL THAT FILL LINE AND BECOMES VERY VALUABLE PROPERTY AT THAT POINT.

BECAUSE IT HAS HIGHWAY ACCESS. ALL THAT STUFF.

SO WHILE WE'RE IN THIS SITUATION WHERE IT BEHOOVES BOTH PARTIES WITH NOT HAVING TO RUN TO THE BACK, IF THERE'S WATER, WELL WAS IN THE BACK AND HE'D HAVE TO RUN 200FT OF WATER WELL OF WELL, I MEAN TO HIS WELL, THAT WOULD BE MAYBE A DISCUSSION POINT, BUT THE DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IS ALREADY LOCATED IN THE FRONT.

I KNOW THAT HE HAD STATED PREVIOUSLY THAT HE HAD HIS WATER WELL REWORKED.

WE'RE NOT SAYING HE CAN'T USE IT FOR IRRIGATION PURPOSES OR FOR ANYTHING AROUND THERE IN THAT AREA, THAT HE HAS TO QUIT USING HIS. WELL, IT'S JUST YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO MONITOR HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING USED, AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME WAY OF STOPPING IT IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT UPHELD.

OKAY, THAT'S MY $0.02. THE QUESTION I HAVE IS, YOU KNOW, ON THESE IMPACT FEES IN THIS AREA, IS THAT CALCULATED IN THE ANNEXATION AGREEMENT? ONCE THEY ONCE THEY CONNECT. THERE'S NO IMPACT FEE ON THE SEWER SIDE.

YES, THERE SHOULD BE. SO YEAH. YES, THERE'S THERE'S SEPARATE.

EACH ONE IS SEPARATE. OKAY. NOW JUST THROWING THIS OUT THERE PLAYING DEVIL'S ADVOCATE HERE.

LET'S SAY WE DON'T ANNEX BUT WE GIVE SEWER STILL PAYS AN IMPACT FEE, RIGHT? YES. I DON'T THINK WE'VE EVER TALKED THAT ONE OUT.

SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND IT. AGAIN.

THE ONLY THING IS THE BILLING. IT'S GOING TO BE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.

IT'S GOING TO ADD A LOT MORE EFFORT ON YOUR SIDE.

RIGHT NOW, EVERYBODY'S WANTING TO PLAY NICE AND HOLD HANDS AND WORK SOMETHING OUT.

I THINK THIS IS THE TIME THAT YOU ASK FOR WHAT YOU NEED.

WHAT NEEDS TO TO FAIRLY RUN IN AGREEMENT. WE DO HAVE CUSTOMERS THAT THAT ARE IN THE TJ THAT ARE SUPPLIED WATER THOUGH THAT THAT IS A THING. THE PROBLEM, THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THAT NOT BEING ANNEXED, YOU RUN INTO A SITUATION WHERE YOU DON'T PAY THE SAME RATE AS, AS A CUSTOMER WITHIN ANGLETON PROPER. SO YOUR YOUR MULTIPLIER MAY BE, YOU KNOW, 1.25.

YOU CAN GO AHEAD. I CAN ASSURE YOU, ALTHOUGH ALTHOUGH NO ONE HAS SEEN THE FUTURE, I CAN ASSURE YOU I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM PAYING MY BILLS. BUT AT THE SAME TOKEN, I MENTIONED TO YOU, I'VE BEEN AT AROUND 50% CAPACITY FOR THE LAST FOUR YEARS.

I WOULD BE OKAY WITH. WE TAKE A MEASUREMENT OF MY WATER AND I'LL PAY YOU MONTHLY FOR 78 SPOTS, EVEN THOUGH I KNOW I'LL BE AT 50% CAPACITY. WELL IT DOESN'T IT DOESN'T EXACTLY WORK THAT WAY, BECAUSE YOU'LL HAVE A SINGULAR TAP FOR THE FOR THE FOR THE SITE.

IT WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT IF IT'S JUST A SINGLE COMMERCIAL BUILDING WITH A BUNCH OF BATHROOMS IN IT.

THAT'S THE WAY WE'RE LOOKING AT IT. YOU'LL HAVE YOU'LL HAVE ONE METER AND ONE OUTLET FOR SEWAGE.

YOU SEE WHAT I'M SAYING? SO IT WON'T IT WON'T MATTER ABOUT YOUR CAPACITY, BUT ABOUT THE CAPACITY OF THE OF THE SITE, SPECIFICALLY WHAT IT WILL WHAT IT WILL BE IS HOW MUCH WATER USAGE THERE ACTUALLY IS.

AND THEN WE DETERMINE THE SEWER OFF OF THAT. I CAN, I CAN IF WE NEED TO GET A METER INSTALLED AT MY WATER WELL TO COUNT THE WATER.

I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT AS WELL. WHATEVER MAKES YOU COMFORTABLE WITH WITH IT, WITH IT BEING PRIVATE THOUGH.

I THINK THAT'S THAT'S AN ISSUE. I'M HAPPY TO PUT ON THE SERVICE AGREEMENT THAT ANGLETON HAS THE RIGHT AND ABILITY TO GO CHECK THE WATER METER AT ANY POINT.

[00:35:05]

I'M OKAY WITH THAT AS WELL. IT'D BE A SMART METER AS WELL.

NO ONE WOULD HAVE TO STEP FOOT ON PROPERTY FOR INSTALLATION, WHICH WOULD BE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR HIRE.

IT'S MY OPINION THAT IF WE THAT IF WE HOOKED YOU INTO THE SEWER, WE NEED TO CONNECT YOU TO THE WATER TO IT SETS IT SETS A PRECEDENT THAT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THIS THAT THIS COUNCIL IS COMFORTABLE WITH WHEN WE START.

AND IT REALLY JUST BOILS DOWN TO WHEN WE START MAKING THESE TYPES OF DECISIONS ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS, WE RUN INTO A PROBLEM WHERE WE HAVE TO CONTINUE TO MAKE EXCEPTIONS FOR OTHERS.

AND WHILE WE DO THAT IN CERTAIN INSTANCES, WE NORMALLY DO IT WHEN IT'S RELATED TO HEALTH AND SAFETY ISSUES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

IT'S NORMALLY NOT A STANDARD PROCEDURAL DEVIATION THAT WE MAKE.

UNDERSTOOD. AND I AM NOT SAYING I WILL NOT CONNECT TO WATER.

ALL I'M ASKING FOR IS THREE YEARS TIME SO I CAN CONNECT INTO THE WATER.

I WILL CONNECT INTO THE WATER. SO JUST CURIOUS, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO WITH THE WITH THE ARABIC LINES THAT YOU CURRENTLY HAVE? I ASSUME YOU'RE GOING TO EXCAVATE THOSE THE, THE LINES ON THE, THE SPRAY FIELDS.

THE SPRAY FIELDS WE CAN DO WITH THEM. I WILL REMOVE THOSE.

SO, SO YOU'RE GOING TO GO OUT THERE AND REMOVE THOSE ALL ALL THOSE LINES PROBABLY HUNDREDS OF FEET.

AND YOU'VE GOT 75. LET'S JUST LET'S THROW IT OUT THERE.

LET'S SAY YOU GOT 100FT OF TRENCH. YOU GOT TO DIG TO RUN WATER TO YOUR EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE AND YOUR RESISTANT TO THAT.

MAKE IT MAKE SENSE TO ME. NO, IT'S BECAUSE I HAVE A HUGE CAPITAL EXPENSE OF REMOVING THE SPRAY PILLS AND CONNECTING TO THE LIFT.

I DON'T HAVE MONEY FOR BOTH PROJECTS AT ONE TIME.

I'M ASKING. I DO THE SEWER AND THEN I BUILD UP MY CAPITAL AND I CONNECT TO THE WATER AS WELL.

AFTER THAT, I WOULD BE I MIGHT BE COMFORTABLE WITH 12 MONTHS.

HOW DOES HOW DOES GAINING SEWER HELP YOU INCREASE YOUR CAPITAL? EXCUSE ME? HE CAN. HE CAN CLEAR THAT THAT THAT PROPERTY OF THE SPRAY FIELDS RIGHT NOW THAT THAT PROPERTY IS TIED UP BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE HE'S DUMPING HIS CLEAN SEWER WATER.

SO YOU'RE HOPING TO, I GUESS. LEVERAGE THIS SO YOU CAN ACCESS THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY? YES. AND I'VE HEARD FROM FROM SURROUNDING PROPERTY.

PROPERTY OWNERS OF THAT ARE HAVING DIFFICULT THEY'VE HAD DIFFICULTY BECAUSE THERE'S A SPRAY FIELD NEXT TO THEM.

THEY'VE BEEN SELLING THEIR LAND. SO I'M HOPING TO GET THAT EYESORE OUT OF CITY OF ANGLETON GIVEN IT'S 288 FRONTAGE, AND I HOPE I CAN DEVELOP ON IT AT A FUTURE DATE AS WELL.

BUT NO PLANS RIGHT NOW. I'M HONESTLY GOING TO CRAWFISH ON WHAT I SAID JUST A SECOND AGO, AND I DON'T NORMALLY DO THAT, BUT I WANT THE WATER CONNECTED WHEN THE SEWERS CONNECTED.

AND IF YOU'RE NOT READY TO DO THAT, THEN, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, THAT'S THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I AM.

I UNDERSTAND YOU'RE TRYING TO I SEE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO. MY OPINION WOULD PROBABLY BE I DON'T KNOW IF THE TIMING IS RIGHT.

AND I KNOW ADDING THIS PROPERTY WOULD HELP YOU ADVANCE WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO.

I GET THAT, BUT I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S RIGHT RIGHT NOW.

I WOULD ALSO ADD, IT'S NOT CERTAINLY ONLY A BENEFIT FOR ME.

IT'S A BENEFIT FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON COMMUNITY.

IT'S WELL, KEEP IN MIND THAT WE I PERSONALLY AND I DON'T KNOW IF THE MEMBERS OF COUNCIL ARE REALLY CONCERNED WITH YOU HAVING THAT SPRAY FILLED THERE.

SO I'M QUITE INDIFFERENT TO IT, HONESTLY. I THINK THAT'S I THINK THAT'S MORE OF A PERSONAL GAIN FOR YOU THAN IT IS FOR ANYONE ELSE. I THINK IT'S A GAME FOR BOTH SIDES.

IF LAND IS COMMERCIAL, LAND IS DEVELOPED ON MY PROPERTY OR SURROUNDING PURCHASES.

THAT BRINGS TAX DOLLARS TO CITY. I THINK IT'S ADVANTAGEOUS FOR YOU.

IF YOU WEREN'T HERE TODAY, WE WOULDN'T EVEN BE DISCUSSING THE PROPERTY.

GENERALLY, I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU. MY MY MY POSITION WOULD BE THAT ADDING OPPORTUNITIES, YOU KNOW.

SURE. BUT I JUST DON'T THINK WE'RE THERE YET.

THAT'S MY OPINION.

ANYBODY ON STAFF WANT TO ADD ANYTHING? THE SECOND CHART MAYOR SHOWS THE BREAKDOWN IN YOUR BACK.

[00:40:03]

THAT YOU WERE ASKING.

WELL. PAGE. CHART BY AGENCY. BY AGENCY.

FOR SOME REASON, I DON'T SEE IT IN HERE. YEAH.

DO YOU REMEMBER SEEING THE CHART. I DON'T OKAY.

BECAUSE IT'S NOT IN HERE. BUT WE CAN MAKE IT ALL ABOUT HERE.

OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS ASKING FOR. YEAH, IT'S OUT THERE.

SORRY. OKAY.

OKAY. COUNCIL. DO YOU HAVE A POSITION YOU'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION ON? MY POSITION IS THAT IF HE'S WILLING TO ACCEPT THE WATER IN THE SEWER.

THE REST IS IS EASY FOR ME TO GET BEHIND. I THINK THAT'S THE PROBLEM THOUGH.

I DON'T THINK HE'S WILLING TO TAKE THE WATER AT PRESENT.

YOU WANT WATER AND SEWER IMMEDIATELY. THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING.

NO ANNEXATION OUTSIDE THE CITY? WELL, THAT'S A I WOULD SAY TWO PARTS OF THAT I UNDERSTAND, BUT I WOULD SAY I WOULD SAY BASED ON. SEE, THAT'S THAT'S NOT A, THAT'S NOT A, THAT'S NOT A.

THAT'S NOT AN UNUSUAL ACCOMMODATION THAT WE'RE HAVING TO MAKE.

SO IF HE, IF HE WANTS TO FOREGO ANNEXATION BUT HE WANTS TO TAKE THE WATER IN THE SEWER, THEN MORE POWER TO YOU.

WE ALREADY DO THAT. AGAIN, UNDERSTAND THAT YOU'RE GOING TO PAY A, A STANDARD MULTIPLIER ON YOUR RATE BECAUSE YOU'RE YOU'RE IN THE ETJ.

WHAT THAT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE FOR YOU AS FAR AS COST OVER TIME, I'M SURE I DON'T KNOW.

SO REALLY, I THINK THE BALL IS IN YOUR COURT.

WE WILL MAKE WE WILL MAKE CONCESSIONS FOR, FOR PEOPLE AS FAR AS EXECUTING STANDARD USE PERMITS AND EXTENDING THINGS TO, TO HELP WITH DEVELOPMENT AND THINGS LIKE THAT.

BUT SOMETHING OF THIS NATURE. I MEAN, IF WE MADE THIS ACCOMMODATION, YOU COULD SELL THE PROPERTY.

WE'D BE DEALING WITH SOMEBODY ELSE. I'M NOT SAYING YOU'RE GOING TO DO THAT.

I'M NOT. I'M NOT CASTING ASPERSIONS ON YOUR INTENT.

BUT YOU HAVE TO LOOK AT THE SITUATION THAT WE'RE IN.

WE HAVE TO. WE HAVE TO REALLY LOOK INTO THE FUTURE WITHOUT HAVING THE ABILITY TO CLEARLY DO SO.

UNDERSTOOD. IT'S REALLY NOT ME BEING DIFFICULT WITH.

YOU'RE TRYING TO TRYING TO DISRUPT YOUR BUSINESS OR NOT CARING ABOUT YOUR RV PARK OR YOUR LIVELIHOOD OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

IT'S SIMPLY PROTECTING THE CITIZENS OF THIS COMMUNITY AND THEIR INFRASTRUCTURE.

UNDERSTOOD. I HAVE ALL U.S. CITIZENS FROM ANGLETON AT MY PARK AS WELL.

SO THIS IS OUR COMMUNITY. MR. SARTIN, YOU MENTIONED YOU WERE WILLING TO GIVE ME A 12 MONTH ON THE WATER.

MY ASK IS NOT EVEN THREE YEARS. CAN YOU GIVE ME 24 MONTHS TO CONNECT INTO WATER AGAIN? I SAID THAT, AND I AND I MADE IT PRETTY CLEAR THAT I.

THAT I PULLED BACK ON THAT SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT WE DON'T DO IT ANYWHERE ELSE.

AND IF WE DID THAT WITH YOU, IT WOULD CREATE IT CREATES A PROBLEM WITH STAFF AND BILLING NUMBER ONE.

AND NUMBER TWO, IT CREATES AN OPENING FOR SOMEONE ELSE TO COME IN AND SAY, BUT WAIT, YOU DID IT OVER HERE.

AND WE TRY NOT TO DO THAT. WE TRY NOT TO OPEN OURSELVES UP FOR THAT SORT OF THING.

PROCEDURES, POLICY STANDARDIZATION IS KIND OF THE DIRECTION THAT WE TRY TO LEAD THE CITY WITH.

AGAIN, WE DO MAKE WE DO MAKE CERTAIN ALLOWANCES IN SPECIFIC SITUATIONS, BUT THEY'RE GENERALLY IN OTHER AREAS AND AND NOT IN THIS TYPE OF SITUATION. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT COULD GET US IN A BIND.

[00:45:01]

WELL, I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW IT GETS YOU IN A BIND.

SETTING THE PRECEDENT. IT SETS A PRECEDENT FOR ALL THE REASONS THAT WE'VE BEEN SPEAKING OF WHILE YOU'VE BEEN STANDING HERE.

DID YOU WANT TO SAY SOMETHING? I WAS JUST GOING TO STAND HERE AND WORK WITH LEGAL TO FIGURE OUT WHAT EXACTLY.

THE DECISION IS FINALLY WE DO HAVE THREE, PROBABLY THREE OPTIONS, BUT THERE IS THE FOOL THE WAY IT'S PRESENTED IN THE PACKET.

ANNEXATION ZONING SERVICE AGREEMENT. AND I THINK IT'S LISTED AT THREE YEARS.

BUT IF YOU WERE TO GIVE THAT DIRECTIVE TO THE CITY MANAGER, HE'S AGREED THAT HE FEELS COMFORTABLE WORKING THROUGH THAT PROCESS WITH LEGAL AND COMING UP WITH THAT SERVICE AGREEMENT THAT THE MAYOR WOULD SIGN. MY QUESTION IS, DO WE IF WE DON'T AGREE TO ANNEX, IS THAT IS THERE SOME SORT OF TIMELINE OR SOME SORT OF PROHIBITION TO REENGAGE IN THIS SUBJECT? LIKE, DO YOU MEAN UNDER THE LAW? YEAH, UNDER THE LAW IN TEXAS LAW, IF YOU DENY IT NOW.

YES. IS THERE LIKE NOW? LIKE I KNOW SOMETIMES ONE YEAR SET OFFS AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

I DON'T KNOW, LIKE, IS THERE ANYTHING LIKE THAT? AS FAR AS YOU'RE AWARE, I AM NOT AWARE OF ANY KIND OF THING THAT PROHIBITS YOU BECAUSE YOU'RE DENYING IT. OKAY.

ALL RIGHT. OKAY. I WILL ALSO REITERATE. I DIDN'T WORK ON ANYTHING.

NO. THAT'S FINE. I DIDN'T THINK THERE WOULD BE BECAUSE I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY PROHIBITION AGAINST THAT.

BUT YOU SAID THERE WAS A THIRD OPTION, RIGHT? YOU SAID THERE WERE THREE, THREE THINGS. THE FIRST IS TO APPROVE AS PRESENTED.

RIGHT. SECOND, CITY MANAGER WORK OUT THE TIMING.

YEAH. THAT OTHER OPTION WAS ANNEXATION DENIED WITH THE ABILITY TO WORK WITH THE PERIMETERS, PARAMETERS OF A SERVICE AGREEMENT.

RIGHT. AND THEN THE OTHER WOULD BE WHAT HE'S ASKING NOW, CONNECT TO WATER AT ALL.

AND WE KNOW THAT'S NOT AGREEABLE TO ANYBODY. OKAY.

CORRECT. I THINK. I THINK THAT'S WHERE WE LAND.

OKAY. COUNCIL. OR YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO TABLE THE MATTER IF YOU NEED MORE INFORMATION.

BUT WOULD YOU WOULD WOULD YOU LIKE TO SPEAK AGAIN ON THE OPTIONS WE'VE PRESENTED.

BECAUSE THAT'S, THAT'S THAT'S I THINK THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE.

WE'RE WE'RE NOT GOING TO DO THE SEWER WITHOUT WATER.

YOUR OPTIONS, YOUR OPTIONS ARE BASICALLY TO HAVE THE THE ANNEXATION WITH WATER AND SEWER OR WATER AND SEWER WITHOUT ANNEXATION.

I DON'T FEEL COMFORTABLE GIVING CITY UTILITIES WITHOUT ANNEXATION BECAUSE THE THERE WILL BE NO TAXES PAID TOWARDS OUR STAFF IF THERE'S AN ISSUE THAT HAS TO BE FIXED.

AND THERE'S OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE THAT WAS GRANTED IN THE PAST IN THE COUNTY THAT LIKE WHY WAS THIS DECISION MADE? WE HAVE TO TAKE CARE OF THIS.

IT'S A LEGITIMATE ARGUMENT. THAT JUST PLAYING DEVIL'S ADVOCATE ON THAT THE THIS AREA, THIS AREA HERE WE PUT IN THE WATER LINES AND SEWER LINES IN THAT AREA WITH THE IDEA AND JOHN KIND OF ALLUDED TO IT, THE IMPACT FEES THAT WE'RE SUPPOSED TO CHARGE ON THIS, TO RECOUP THE MONEY ON THE DEBT SERVICE THAT WE PUT IN FOR THAT LOCATION.

SO IT'S TO OUR BENEFIT IN THIS AREA TO GET PEOPLE TO TIE INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM IN THIS IN THE WATER LINES, TO PAY FOR THAT DEBT SERVICE. HOW MUCH IS THE 2015 BOND? BUT DO YOU KNOW HOW MUCH THAT PREMIUM IS NOW? OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD? NO, I DIDN'T EXPECT YOU TO KNOW THAT.

BUT AT SOME POINT, IF IT'S NOT PAID FOR HERE, IT'S PAID FOR BY EVERYBODY ELSE.

SO THAT'S ON THE BACK. THAT'S ON THE BACK SIDE THERE.

SO KEEP THAT IN MIND. WE DO HAVE A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT GOING IN OVER THERE.

THE NEW DEALERSHIP IS GOING IN AND I BELIEVE THEY'RE TYING IN AND THEY'RE PAYING THEIR IMPACT FEES.

[00:50:05]

KUBOTA DID LOVES DID I CAN'T REMEMBER WHO ELSE HAS ALREADY PAID THAT BUT TEX DOT.

RIGHT. SO THERE'S THAT. KEEP THAT IN MIND. AND THEY'RE PAYING A PREMIUM IF THEY'RE NOT ANNEXED INTO THE CITY.

SO THEY'RE HAVING TO PAY EXTRA IN LIEU OF PROPERTY TAX BASICALLY IS WHAT THAT'S HOW IT WAS DESIGNED IN THE PAST.

JUST THROWING THAT OUT THERE AND UNDERSTAND IF WE WERE TO APPROVE ANNEXATION WITH WITH YOU TAPPING INTO THE CITY SEWER AND WATER.

I MEAN THIS YOU HAVE I MEAN AT WILL, RIGHT? I MEAN, PRETTY PRETTY WELL.

YOU THEN AT THAT POINT, YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO IT.

NOBODY'S FORCING THE BILL DOWN YOUR THROAT TODAY OR TOMORROW OR NEXT WEEK.

I HAD THE MEETING. I CAN DECIDE WHEN TO CONNECT TO WATER AND SEWER.

MEANING? I DON'T HAVE TO DO IT JUST NOW, RIGHT? LIKE I NEED TO HAVE IT DONE. 2026. I'M THINKING ABOUT COSTS AND HOW TO PAY FOR ALL OF THIS.

THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING. YOU JUST GOT TO CONNECT BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

NOT. YEAH. AND THEN THE OTHER ONE. 24 MONTHS, 36 MONTHS DOWN THE ROAD.

IT'S BOTH AT THE SAME TIME, RIGHT? YEAH, BUT NOBODY'S TELLING YOU YOU HAVE TO INCUR THESE COSTS TOMORROW.

YOU KNOW, YOU DECIDE WHEN IT'S WHEN IT'S VIABLE FOR YOU TO MAKE THAT.

BUT AT THIS POINT, YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO DO IT.

IT'S JUST KNOWING THAT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO BOTH OF THEM AT THE SAME TIME. AND IT'S AGAIN, IT'S FOR THE REASONS THAT WE DISCUSSED. IT'S NOT IN AN ATTEMPT TO HURT YOU.

IT MAKES COMPLETE SENSE. I WAS COMING HERE WITH A REQUEST TO UNDERSTAND.

IT'S NOT THE NORM. YES, SIR. LOUD AND CLEAR. YEAH.

WHAT COUNCILMAN SARTIN IS SAYING IS, YOU KNOW, IF WE.

IF WE SAY WE'RE NOT GOING TO ANNEX YOU, YOU CAN WORK WITH THE CITY MANAGER.

IF YOU WANT WATER AND SEWER, YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN CLOCK.

SO IT'S AT YOUR DISCRETION. IF YOU THINK SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR FROM NOW, YOU THINK YOU'RE READY TO HAVE THAT DISCUSSION.

THAT IS. BUT IT WILL BE BOTH AT THE SAME TIME.

BUT HE'S SAYING WE'RE BY DOING THAT, YOU'RE ON YOUR OWN CLOCK.

NOT WE'RE NOT SAYING YOU HAVE A YEAR TO TO GET THIS DONE.

IT'S WHENEVER YOU'RE FEEL COMFORTABLE YOU'RE READY TO GO. THEN YOU TALK TO THE CITY MANAGER TO GO FORWARD.

THAT'S IF I DO NOT ANNEX. THAT'S IF YOU DON'T ANNEX.

IF I ANNEX, THEN WE'RE SAYING IMMEDIATELY. IS THAT IS IS THAT IS THAT COMMON, THOUGH, FOR US? I MEAN, IF WE ANNEX HIM TYPICALLY.

WHAT IS THAT? IF HE'S NOT TYING INTO THE SYSTEMS, WHY WOULD HE WANT TO BE ANNEXED IN PART OF THE TAX RATE? SO DOES HIM NO GOOD UNLESS HE HAS ACCESS TO THAT.

THAT'S THAT'S RIGHT. AND AND WE'RE ON THE CLOCK TO WRITE.

ANNEXATION. WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE HE HAS ACCESS TO THE WATER AND SEWER.

IT HAS TO BE AT HIS PROPERTY LINE. IS IT THERE NOW? THAT IS PROPERTY LINE, RIGHT. BUT WE'VE MET OUR CONDITIONS.

OKAY. CAN I GET A LITTLE MORE TIME TO DECIDE THE ANNEXATION VERSUS ANNEXATION PATH? YEAH. WE CAN WE CAN TABLE THIS AND YOU CAN BRING IT BACK.

BUT AND I DO I DO WANT TO REITERATE TO YOU THOUGH, WITHOUT THE ANNEXATION YOU ARE GOING TO PAY A PREMIUM FOR THE.

FOR THE SERVICE. SO JUST KEEP KEEP THAT IN MIND.

SO THAT'S A 25% PREMIUM. I DEFER TO SUSAN. SUSAN.

IT'S SOMEWHERE IN THERE RIGHT. 1.25 I THINK IS WHAT I HEARD.

RIGHT, HECTOR. OKAY. AND THERE IS PRECEDENT. WE DO.

WE'VE GOT THAT EVERYWHERE. IS THERE A WAY I CAN GET US TO WORK WITH THE CITY TO GET AN ESTIMATE OF WHAT WATER COST, WATER AND SEWER COSTS WOULD BE? BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A I THINK PROBABLY THE BEST THING IS TO TABLE THIS ITEM AND LET YOU GO BACK AND WORK WITH OTIS AND THE TEAM AND FIGURE OUT WHAT AVENUES YOU WANT TO GO BY, AND THEN YOU CAN BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL AND WE CAN TAKE THAT ACTION. UNDERSTOOD.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO TABLE. SECOND. MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN SMITH TO TABLE THIS AGENDA ITEM.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS? I JUST WANT TO ADD, I ENCOURAGE YOU TO REACH OUT TO TEX-DOT ON THE FEASIBILITY OF CONNECTING TO THE THEATER, BECAUSE THEY ARE IN A TORTUOUSLY. PICKY. WHAT'S A POLITE TERM TO CONNECT THAT PROPERTY THAT YOU'RE INTERESTED IN SELLING IS COMMERCIAL.

THAT'S ON THE FEEDER. THAT PROPERTY RIGHT THERE? YEAH. SO TO HAVE AN ENTRANCE ONTO THE FEEDER, THAT WOULD BE TXDOT.

SO TO START THE CONVERSATIONS NOW TO SEE IF THAT'S A POSSIBILITY WOULD BE A VERY GOOD THING FOR YOU TO DO.

AND WE'LL SAY THAT WE'LL SAY THEY'RE VERY THEY'RE VERY BUSY. SO YOU DEFINITELY WANT TO GET IN LINE. THANK YOU FOR THAT. YOU'RE WELCOME.

[00:55:05]

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. APPRECIATE YOU COMING IN.

THANK YOU. WE HAVEN'T VOTED, SO I'LL CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF TABLING SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU FOR COMING TONIGHT. APPRECIATE IT. MOVING ON TO REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 15.

[15. Discussion and update on the Austin Colony Subdivision Development. ]

DISCUSSION UPDATE ON THE AUSTIN COLONY SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL. I HAVE BAD NEWS, MR. RAY. I'VE BEEN TRYING TO GET IN TOUCH WITH HIM.

HE IS NOT HERE TONIGHT, AND I DON'T THINK HE SENT ANY REPRESENTATIVES FOR THE UPDATE IN WHICH HE WAS TO GIVE TO COUNCIL.

SO WE DID RESCHEDULE THIS FROM YOUR LAST CONSIDERATION OF UPDATES, AND HE WAS AWARE, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, I GOT NO RESPONSE. DEFAULT? YES. THERE'S NO ACTION ON THIS ITEM.

IT WAS JUST FOR INFORMATION FROM THE DEVELOPER.

YEAH, WE TYPICALLY DO THAT ANNUALLY. RIGHT. SO WE'LL REQUEST HIM TO COME BACK.

YES, BUT MR. RENE IS HERE, AND SHE'S WANTING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, SO I'M GOING TO LET HER SPEAK ON IT.

THANK YOU. NOW, I'VE FORGOTTEN EVERYTHING I WAS GOING TO SAY.

IT'S BEEN A LONG TIME SINCE I'VE BEEN BEHIND THIS PODIUM.

I KNOW. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN? KIND OF SHAKING.

I'M A LITTLE NERVOUS. SO MANY OF YOU KNOW, I WAS JUST THINKING WE WERE SITTING OVER THERE LISTENING TO ALL THIS.

REMEMBER BACK WHEN WE BUILT CITIES WITH BUILDING BLOCKS AND LINCOLN LOGS? IT WAS A WHOLE LOT EASIER THAN THIS, RIGHT? ON AUGUST THE 5TH, 2021, I ACTUALLY BEFORE THAT, I HEARD A RUMOR ABOUT THE SUBDIVISION OF AUSTIN COLONY.

DIDN'T KNOW THE NAME OF IT, BUT ACTUALLY ATTENDED A PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING WHERE THEY WERE GOING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM AGRICULTURE TO WHATEVER THE LINGO IS THEY ZONED IT TO. AND I ACTUALLY MR. RAY MET MR. RAY AT THAT TIME.

AND WHEN HE WAS QUESTIONED, WELL, BECAUSE HE THREW A MAP UP THERE AND ALL OF A SUDDEN I SAW WHERE MY ENTRANCE AND I MIGHT AS WELL GO BACK.

SORRY. WE LIVE. WE HAVE THE BARN. WE OWN THE PROPERTY, THE TWO ACRES.

IT'S IN THE DONUT. I'VE HEARD IT CALLED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SUBDIVISION, WHICH TO THIS DAY I STILL SCRATCH MY HEAD TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHY NO ONE EVER. ONE TIME CAME AND ASKED US IF WE WANTED TO SELL OUR PROPERTY TO BE A PART OF THIS.

IT'S JUST I'LL FOREVER WONDER WHY OR HOW THAT HAPPENS.

BUT ANYWAY SO I SAW THIS MAP ON THERE, THIS PLAT, AND SHOWED THESE PROPERTIES AT THESE LOTS DIVIDED AND SITTING ON TOP OF OUR ROAD THAT WE GET INTO.

SO I'M LIKE, OH MY GOSH. SO I ASKED THE QUESTION, HOW, YOU KNOW, HOW ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DO THAT? SO MR. RAY SAID WHEN HE WAS QUESTIONED ABOUT THE EASEMENT HE SAID THAT'S AN EASEMENT BY USE.

AND WE WILL GET WITH THE OWNER TO DETERMINE WHERE THEY WANT IT.

WE WILL SURVEY IT, WE WILL STAKE IT, AND WE'LL PAY FOR IT, AND WE WILL GIVE THEM A WRITTEN DEED THAT'S QUOTES THAT WILL BE GOOD FOR US AND GOOD FOR YOU. AND WE HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTERFERING WITH YOUR USE OF YOUR PROPERTY.

I RESPONDED WELL, AS AN, YOU KNOW, AS AN HONEST PERSON, THAT'S WHAT I EXPECTED.

I EXPECTED YOU TO BE HONEST AS WELL. BUT, YOU KNOW, CRAZIER THINGS HAVE HAPPENED.

WELL, CRAZY THINGS DID HAPPEN BECAUSE WE GOT A CALL IN OCTOBER OF THIS PAST YEAR FROM THE ENGINEER THAT THEY'RE WORKING WITH, DOUG RESSLER, AND HE WANTED TO MEET WITH US. HE WENT OUT AND MET WITH MY HUSBAND, TOMMY, WHO WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HERE DOING THIS PRESENTATION TONIGHT, BY THE WAY. SO I HAD TO GIVE A QUICK LESSON FROM HIM BECAUSE HE CONVENIENTLY GOT SICK.

NO, HE REALLY IS SICK, AND HE COULDN'T BE HERE.

BUT ANYWAY, I GOT A QUICK LESSON, SO I HOPE I SAY ALL THIS RIGHT.

I BROUGHT THE IS THIS A FLAT LIKE NOT A I MEAN IT'S LIKE A GOOGLE EARTH OR WHATEVER, BUT IT'S GOT THE LINES DRAWN ON THERE WHERE THE LOTS WOULD BE. AND MR. RACER COMES OUT THERE AND HE SAYS TO TOMMY, I WAS IN CALIFORNIA WORKING.

AND HE GOES WELL, TOMMY, THIS IS WHERE WE'RE GOING TO, THEY'RE GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO PUT YOUR EASEMENT.

I'LL BRING THIS SO Y'ALL CAN SEE IT CLOSER IF YOU'D LIKE.

THIS RIGHT HERE THE ROAD IS HERE THAT WE USE NOW.

AND WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY BECAUSE IT'S MY HUSBAND'S A FARMER, AND WE OWN COMBINES AND CARTS AND TRACTORS AND PLANTERS AND ALL OF THAT.

AND THAT'S WHY WE BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY FOR A PLACE TO STORE ALL THAT.

WELL, IF YOU SEE THIS DRAWING, I WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO TELL ME HOW YOU MIGHT GET A COMBINE OR A TRACTOR TO MAKE THAT TURN RIGHT THERE OVER THE CATTLE BARN.

BUT ANYWAY, IT DOESN'T MATTER. TOMMY SHOWED HIM OUR DEED.

WE ACTUALLY DO HAVE A DEED FOR. AND WE. AND WE DO NOT CHOOSE TO MOVE THE EASEMENT.

I TELL YOU ALL THAT. I SHOWED UP IN AUGUST THE 10TH AT A COUNCIL MEETING WHERE TRAVIS COUNCILMAN TRAVIS TOWNSEND ASKED ABOUT THE ACCESS TO THE

[01:00:02]

BARN, AND MR. RAY SAID, RIGHT NOW THIS QUOTE, THIS IS A QUOTE RIGHT NOW, THERE IS NO RECORD EASEMENT, RECORDED EASEMENT. BUT I BELIEVE THEY HAVE AN EASEMENT BY USE.

THEY HAVE AN EASEMENT BY DECENCY. YOU CAN'T CUT SOMEONE OFF THERE.

CUT, CUT SOMEONE FROM GETTING TO THEIR HOUSE.

I'VE DISCUSSED THIS WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER, WHICH HE'S TALKING ABOUT AT THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.

WE WILL GET WITH THEM. WE WILL ASK THEM WHERE THEY WANT THIS ROAD TO GO.

WE WILL GET WITH THEM AND SURVEY AND STAKE IT.

AND THEN WE WILL GIVE THEM A DEED TO IT. THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM TO BUILD THE HOUSES AND GIVE THEM A ROAD.

AND THEN HE SAYS, FUNNY WHEN I DISCUSS THIS WITH HER EARLIER MEETING AND I HAD NOT LOOKED AT THE PLAT, BUT THEN WHEN I SAT DOWN AND LOOKED AT IT AND AS HE CHUCKLED, HE SAYS, AND I WENT, GOOD GOSH, WE'RE GOING TO BUILD A HOUSE RIGHT ON TOP OF THEIR ENTRANCE.

BUT THERE'S PLENTY OF ROOM THERE. I TELL YOU THAT STORY.

WE'RE PROTECTED BY OUR I TELL YOU THAT STORY TO SPEAK TO THE INTEGRITY OF WHO YOU'RE DEALING WITH AND WHO WE'RE DEALING WITH.

SO WE ARE CONCERNED ABOUT DRAINAGE. DURING HARVEY, WE SHEEP FLOWED ACROSS THAT PROPERTY RIGHT HERE.

THERE IS DETENTION THAT WAS THERE WELL BEFORE WE BOUGHT OUR PROPERTY.

GOD KNOWS HOW LONG IT'S BEEN THERE. BUT YOU SEE THAT A CUL DE SAC IS GOING TO SIT ON THAT NOW.

YOU SEE THAT THERE'S LOTS SITTING THERE NOW WHERE OUR OUR PROPERTY DRAINS TO THAT DETENTION.

THIS RIGHT HERE IS A NATURAL. WHAT DO YOU CALL IT? HABITAT. IT'S A NATURAL WETLANDS. WETLANDS. YES.

NATURAL WETLANDS ALSO DRAINS THERE AS WELL. BUT WE'VE NEVER HAD A PROBLEM WITH FLOODING THERE.

BUT IF YOU DRIVE AROUND THE CITY AND YOU LOOK AT THESE DEVELOPMENTS AND YOU SEE HOW HIGH THEY'RE BUILDING THOSE UP FROM EVEN THE ROADS AND THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS, IT CONCERNS US. WE ARE CONCERNED WE ARE ON ALERT.

THERE IS ALSO A THIS IS WHERE OUR POWER EASEMENT IS THAT CUTS RIGHT ACROSS THOSE TWO PROPERTIES AS WELL, OR THOSE PROPERTIES AS WELL. SO WE JUST WANT IT TO BE BROUGHT TO YOUR ATTENTION THAT WE DON'T WANT OUR POWER INTERRUPTED.

WE DON'T WANT TO BE FLOODED. AS THE PREVIOUS PLANT CITY PLANNER SAID, IT IS A DONUT.

THEY COME IN AND THEY SURROUND US WITH DEVELOPMENT AND THEY FLOOD US.

WE'RE ALL GOING TO HAVE A PROBLEM. I JUST WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT. THANK YOU.

HAVE YOU HAD ANY DISCUSSION WITH HIM SINCE? WE HAVE.

WELL, WE ACTUALLY SPOKE WITH HIM AFTER ALL THAT HAPPENED.

WE SPOKE WITH AN ATTORNEY BECAUSE WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE. TOM.

WHEN WHEN DOUG CAME OUT, TOMMY ACTUALLY SLID THE DATA OVER THERE TO HIM AND SHOWED HIM.

AND HE WAS SHOCKED HOW A DEVELOPER DOES NOT KNOW THAT THERE'S A RECORDED AGE OLD EASEMENT.

I DO NOT KNOW. BUT THAT WAS THAT'S WHAT CREATED MY QUESTION IN THE FIRST PLACE, WAS ACTUALLY SEEING THE DRAWING WITH THOSE LOTS SITTING RIGHT UP FRONT THERE ON THE EASEMENT. HONESTLY, I DIDN'T KNOW WE HAD TO BE COMING IN, BUT HE SHOWED THAT TO DOUG AND DOUG WAS SHOCKED.

WE DID NOT GET ANY OTHER CORRESPONDENCE FROM THEM, BUT WE HAVE AN ATTORNEY WORKING ON ANOTHER PROJECT FOR US AT OUR RANCH IN CEDAR LANE, AND WHEN TOMMY VISITED WITH HIM, HE JUST HE WROTE A LETTER.

I THINK YOUR CITY ATTORNEY, I'M SURE, HAS RECEIVED THE LETTER.

YOU GOT THE LETTER RIGHT? I BELIEVE MY FIRM GOT THE LETTER.

I'M SORRY. I BELIEVE MY FIRM GOT THE LETTER. OKAY.

AND THEN MR. RAY GOT THE LETTER, AND HE DID RESPOND TO IT AS WELL.

HE WAS QUITE SURPRISED TO HEAR FROM US. HE'S BEEN WORKING WITH US AS A GOOD NEIGHBOR.

HE SAYS. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT. ANYBODY WANT TO TALK? ANYTHING ON ITEM NUMBER 15? I FORGOT ONE IMPORTANT PART.

I'M SO SORRY. OH, I FORGOT ONE IMPORTANT PART.

OH, GOSH. THIS CAMERA TOO. OH. YOU ARE. SMILE.

YEAH. SO YEAH. WHEN WHEN HE SAID THEY'RE GOING TO ALLOW YOU TO USE PUT YOUR EASEMENT HERE AND YOU'RE GOING TO NEED TO BUILD IT AND PAY FOR IT. AND I QUOTED TO YOU WHAT HE SAID, WHAT HE SAID FOR 2021.

I DID CALL HIM ONCE BEFORE TOMMY SAID, CALL MR. RAY. BEFORE WE DECIDED TO EXTEND. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MEANS TO SKIN A BARN.

I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT MEANT TO SKIN A BARN, BUT PUT NEW TENT ON THE BARN BEFORE WE DECIDED TO DO THAT AND SPEND THAT MONEY.

HE SAID, CALL MR. RAY AND SEE IF HE WANTS TO BUY THIS PLACE.

AND SO I CALLED HIM AND HE SAID, OH, MR. NAY, I DON'T EVEN HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY GAS TO COME TO ANGLETON.

SO. THAT'S WHO WE DEAL WITH.

[01:05:03]

OKAY. I NUMBER 16. OH. GO AHEAD. DO YOU? BECAUSE IT IS AN AGENDA ITEM.

CAN YOU HAVE ANY DISCUSSION? WE'VE ALREADY READ THE AGENDA ITEM.

WE'VE HAD DISCUSSION ON IT. SO YOU CAN I MEAN IT HAS TO BE.

ON THE UPDATE. THAT'S RIGHT. YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING BECAUSE THERE WASN'T AN ACTUAL UPDATE.

DO YOU HAVE DO YOU. RIGHT. OH, DO YOU MEAN DOES IT NEGATE THE DISCUSSION? RIGHT. THE FACT THAT MR. RAY WAS NOT HERE HAD PUBLIC.

YEAH. THAT'S RIGHT. DISCUSSION ON THE AUSTIN COLONY SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENTS.

OKAY. WELL, MY ONLY DISCUSSION IS WE NEED TO HEAR FROM MR. RAY. CORRECT. I MEAN, THERE'S BEEN A COUPLE MEETINGS NOW WE HAVE.

SOMETHING THAT'S BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION. I JUST NEED TO BE.

IT NEEDS TO BE HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS. THAT'S ALL.

IN PERSON, PREFERABLY JUST LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE APPEARED FROM THEIR OTHER SUBDIVISIONS.

YEP. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 16.

[16. Discussion and possible action on a proposal from HDR Engineering for the 2026 Oyster Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Permit Renewal. ]

DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON A PROPOSAL FROM HDR ENGINEERING FOR THE 2026 OYSTER CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.

PERMIT RENEWAL. GOOD EVENING. COUNCIL.

BACK IN SEVERAL YEARS AGO, WE HAVE FILLED OUT THE CITY'S WORK WITH HECTOR TO DO TESTING AND FILLED OUT THE CITY'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT PERMIT.

DISCHARGE PERMIT AT THE OYSTER CREEK TREATMENT PLANT.

THAT WILL EXPIRE JANUARY 2ND, 2027. T-C-E-Q HAS REGULATION THAT THE NEW PERMIT MUST BE SUBMITTED 180 DAYS PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE, WHICH WOULD BE JULY 2ND, 2026.

THEREFORE, WE HAVE PREPARED A PROPOSAL TO COMPLETE THE PERMIT RENEWAL APPLICATION FOR SUBMITTAL FOR THE CITY OF ANGLETON TO KEEP IN COMPLIANCE WITH TKC FOR THE OPERATIONS OF THE OYSTER CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT.

I SEE IT'S NOT BUDGETED. SUSIE SHAKING HER HEAD.

SO IT'S NOT. BUT WE HAVE THE PROFESSIONAL FEES IN OUR IN OUR OPERATING BUDGET.

THAT'S WHAT THAT TYPICALLY GOES TO FOR ANY TYPE OF TC ITEMS OR ANY REGULATORY ITEMS LIKE THAT.

I DON'T THINK WE HAVE A CHOICE. RIGHT? YEAH. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO EXECUTE HIS CONTRACT TO COMPLETE THE PERMITTING OF THE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT IN THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $24,600. SECOND MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SARTIN.

SECOND BY MAYOR BROOKLYN TOWNSEND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? I JUST WANT TO SAY ONCE YOU SUBMIT, YOU FEEL CONFIDENT THAT IT'S GOING TO BE APPROVED? YEAH, I BELIEVE SO. DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE IN THE PERMIT THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SUBMIT THE ACTIONS WE ARE TAKING AND OR I GUESS MY QUESTION IS, WHATEVER YOU'RE SUBMITTING, THAT THE ACTIONS WE'RE TAKING FROM TCU WOULD GIVE US SOME TIME TO DO IT.

I'LL HAVE TO LOOK AND READ INTO THAT. I THINK YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO JUST SUBMIT ON HOW THE PLANT CURRENTLY OPERATES.

PULL THE PERMIT. IF THE TESTING PROCEDURES THAT COME BACK, WE'LL HAVE TO PUT A PLAN TOGETHER AT THAT POINT ON ADDRESSING THAT WHICH WE'RE IN THE PROCESS OF DOING RIGHT NOW. THAT'S NOT A NECESSARY ACTION ITEM FOR THIS.

IT'S SOMETHING THAT RUNS COPLANAR TO IT. GOOD.

I JUST DIDN'T KNOW WITH WHAT WE'RE SUBMITTING AND WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW, WHAT, THEY WOULD LOOK AT THE OTHER ONE AND SAY, NO, YOU DIDN'T DO THIS. WHAT'S YOUR TIME FRAME? NO, THEY WOULDN'T BECAUSE SO THE WHAT WE'RE TALKING, WHAT YOU'RE REFERENCING IS WHAT THEY, YOU KNOW, KIND OF NICKED US FOR BEFORE. AND THAT WAS A VIOLATION THAT HAPPENED IN THAT TIME PERIOD.

AND SINCE THEN WE HAVE NOT HAD THAT SAME VIOLATION.

SO WHEN WE GO INTO THE TESTING FOR THIS PERMIT, SUBMIT EVERYTHING, IT'S ALL GOING TO BE AS LIKE, YOU KNOW, NORMAL FUNCTIONING PLANT. THEY KNOW ABOUT THE ISSUE WE HAD.

WE'RE, WE'RE WE'RE PAYING FOR THE ISSUE THAT WE HAD.

AND YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S THE END OF IT. SO NOW IF WE WERE STILL HAVING THOSE INCURSIONS ON A DAY TO DAY BASIS,

[01:10:02]

THEN YES, THIS MIGHT BE A TOTALLY DIFFERENT STORY.

OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE FLOOR.

ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? JOHN, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? SIR, DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING ELSE? NO, SIR. OKAY.

CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

LET'S GO TO ITEM NUMBER 17. DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON PROPOSAL FROM HDR ENGINEERING FOR THE DESIGN,

[17. Discussion and possible action on a proposal from HDR Engineering for the design, bid, and construction management on the Lorraine Street Sanitary Sewer Improvements.]

BUILD AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ON THE LORAIN STREET SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS.

CITY STAFF HAS HAD A FEW MAINTENANCE ISSUES WITH THIS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LINE.

IT'S A LARGE SANITARY SEWER LINE THAT THAT PROVIDES SERVICES TO A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THE CITY.

THE LINE IS AN OLDER LINE. THEY HAVE BEEN DOING ROUTINE, ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, INCLUDING JETTING IT OUT.

IT'S GETTING DEBRIS HUNG IN IT. SO PREVIOUSLY, SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, WE WENT IN THERE.

WE LOVED IT. WE CLEANED IT FOR TWO DAYS. COME TO FIND OUT THAT THE PIPE IS WHAT WAS THE BEST TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THAT THE CITY PUT IT IN WAS.

IT'S A CONCRETE PIPE WITH A KIND OF A RESIN COATING.

AND THE RESIN COATING IS FALLING IN AND FAILING, AND IT'S HANGING UP EVERYTHING.

MATTER OF FACT, WE COULDN'T TELEVISE PROBABLY 150 FOOT OF PIPE BECAUSE WE COULDN'T GET A CAMERA TO TO PHYSICALLY BE PULLED THROUGH THERE.

SO THE PIPE IS STARTING TO HAVE SOME SIGNIFICANT ISSUES CAUSING CONSTANT MAINTENANCE OF THE STAFF.

SO HECTOR AND I PUT TOGETHER A COUPLE EXHIBITS, WENT THROUGH SOME COST ESTIMATES, IDENTIFIED A FEW OPTIONS.

WE CAME UP WITH A WITH A SOLUTION TO WHERE WE WERE GOING TO ACTUALLY PARALLEL THE LINE.

THIS WILL ALLOW US TO KEEP THE LINE CONSTANTLY FLOWING UNTIL WE GET THE NEW, NEW SYSTEM IN TO WHERE WE CUT DOWN ON THE COST ON THE BYPASS.

THE LINE WILL BE IMPROVED TO A 30 INCH LINE, WHICH IS A MORE STANDARD LINE THAN A 27 INCH LINE.

WE WILL BE CROSSING TWO ADA, SO THERE'LL BE COORDINATION WITH TEXDOT.

WE'LL HAVE TO PUT THE 30 INCH LINE IN A STEEL CASING.

THAT'S WHY THIS THING IS SO EXPENSIVE. WITH A 30 INCH LINE, YOU DON'T REALLY HAVE AN OPTION OF DOING A LOT OF PVC THINGS OF THAT NATURE.

WE'RE GOING TO BE GOING WITH THE WHOLE PIPE, WHICH IS A FIBERGLASS CENTRIFUGE PIPE THAT WILL LAST FOR A LONG TIME.

IT'S GOT STRENGTH, LIKE CONCRETE AND IT'S RESISTIVE TO THE GASES OF THE SANITARY SEWER.

SO THIS IS GOING TO BE A A SIGNIFICANT UPGRADE AND FIX FOR YEARS AND YEARS AND YEARS TO COME.

THE EXISTING LINE WILL THEN BE ABANDONED IN PLACE AND GROUT FILLED AND RECONNECTED BACK IN THE NEW LINE WILL BE RECONNECTED BACK INTO THE SYSTEM TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE AS IS TODAY. JUST OFFSET A LITTLE BIT IN THE LORRAINE STREET RIGHT AWAY.

WITH THAT WE HAVE PROVIDED A PROPOSAL FOR THE AMOUNT OF $178,510 FOR THE ENGINEERING BID AND CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OF THE LORAIN STREET SANITARY SEWER.

WE HAVE PROVIDED COST ESTIMATE, CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATED COST ESTIMATE IS ABOUT ABOUT A MILLION.

IS WHAT WE SAID A LITTLE UNDER A MILLION? I BELIEVE THAT HAS BEEN PUT INTO THE BUDGET.

CORRECT. SO I BELIEVE THIS HAS BEEN KIND OF, KIND OF BEEN WAITING FOR FOR US TO MOVE ON IT.

WHEN DO YOU THINK YOU'LL BE DONE WITH THE ENGINEERING PORTION OF THIS, OR ARE YOU ARE YOU YOU PRETTY? YOU CAN THROW IT TOGETHER PRETTY QUICK. I ASSUME I'M GOING TO TRY TO WORK ON AS FAST AS WE CAN. WE'RE WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO GET THE SURVEY IN FIRST.

THAT'LL BE THE BIGGEST THING. AND START COORDINATING WITH TXDOT. TRY TO CONTROL THINGS OF THAT NATURE, TO PULL THAT PERMIT TO DO THE OPERATIONS INSIDE THERE RIGHT AWAY.

THE LENGTHS. NOT THAT LONG. I MEAN, IT'S ONLY 450FT, RIGHT? SO WE'LL HAVE TO. I THINK WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME ISSUES POTENTIALLY WITH WITH A COUPLE OF THE METERS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. WE'LL HAVE TO ADJUST. BUT I BELIEVE IF YOU LOOK IN THE PROPOSAL, WE HAVE THE SCHEDULE LAID OUT.

WE BELIEVE WE'RE GOING TO GET IT READY TO BID IN THE NEXT FIVE MONTHS. BID PHASE WILL TAKE A MONTH, EXECUTION OF CONTRACT WILL TAKE A MONTH AND THEN FIVE MONTHS TO CONSTRUCT.

SO SO WE'LL WE'LL ASSUME THE THE COST AFTER OUR FISCAL YEAR.

THE CONSTRUCTION COST? YES. BUDGET AMOUNT SAYS ZERO.

BOND. CORRECT. YEP. $8 MILLION UTILITY BOND. THAT WAS JUST TAKEN.

THAT'S WHAT'S COMING OUT OF. YES. MAKE SURE YOU IN THE FUTURE MAKE SURE WE UPDATE THAT.

OKAY. HAVE YOU RECEIVED THE FUNDS FOR THAT 8 MILLION YET?

[01:15:06]

WE HAVE RECEIVED THE FUNDS. OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO EXECUTE HIS CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICE FOR THE LORAIN STREET SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $178,510. SECOND.

THANK YOU. JOHN. MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SARTIN.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN SMITH FOR APPROVAL. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? HEARING NONE. CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ITEM 18. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

[18. Discussion and possible action on the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) 288B Downtown Improvements and the possible approval to go to bid for 288B Utility Improvements. ]

TWO TASB DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS AND THE POSSIBLE APPROVAL TO GO TO BID FOR 288 B UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS.

SINCE THE PREVIOUS COUNCIL MEETING. WE HAVE HAD A MEETING ON THE 60% DESIGN PLANS AND DISCUSSED WITH TEXDOT OUR COMMENTS.

THEY HAVE ADDRESSED OUR 30% COMMENTS. THE PLANS LOOK LIKE THEY'RE COMING TOGETHER PRETTY WELL.

WE WENT BACK AND TALKED TO THEM ON A COUPLE ISSUES THAT THAT WE HAD TO CALL A SPECIAL ANOTHER SPECIAL MEETING WITH REPRESENTATIVES.

IN THAT MEETING, WE DISCUSSED SEVERAL THINGS. ONE OF THE THINGS WE DISCUSSED WAS THE ACTUAL IDENTIFIED INDEPENDENT BIKE LANES ON THE SIDE OF 288.

GOING BACK AND FORTH, WE LOOKED AT MULTIPLE OPTIONS, THOSE OPTIONS BEING EVERYTHING FROM POTENTIALLY SHARED BIKE PATH WITH THE WITH THE TRAFFIC, WHICH TEXDOT DOES NOT ALLOW ON THEIR FACILITIES ANYMORE.

EVEN THOUGH YOU CAN RIDE A BIKE DOWN ANY ROADWAY, THEY DON'T WANT TO PROMOTE THAT.

SO THAT IS NOT AN OPTION. WE ALSO DISCUSSED THE POTENTIAL OF EXTENDING THE SIDEWALKS OUT ANOTHER TWO FOOT TO BECOME A SHARED PATH TO WHERE THE BICYCLISTS COULD RIDE ON THAT SHARED PATH.

OF THAT EIGHT FOOT SIDEWALK. THE PROBLEM WITH THAT IS THE CLEARANCES ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK AND WITH THE CANOPIES THAT ARE COMING OVER FROM THE BUSINESSES, IT'S GOT TO BE CLEAN AND FREE TO WHERE PEOPLE CAN'T SNAG THEIR HANDLEBARS AND WRECK.

PLUS TWO FOOT ON THE OUTSIDE WHERE IF IT'S A FENCE OR A WALL, THEY HIT IT WITH THEIR BICYCLE HANDS, CAUSING AN ACCIDENT. WE ALSO BROUGHT UP POTENTIALLY ABOUT ANOTHER ROUTE THAT WAS KIND OF SHOT DOWN.

ULTIMATELY, THE DIRECTION WE WERE GIVEN IS ESSENTIALLY THE GRANT WAS SUBMITTED AND SCORED FOR HAVING THOSE BICYCLE LANES AS PART OF THE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION ROUTE. AND WITH THAT, THEY ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE WATER LANES 11 FOOT THAT WE WANTED AND STILL MAINTAIN THOSE BICYCLE PATHS.

SO THEY ARE NOT GOING TO REMOVE THE BICYCLE LANES FROM THIS PROJECT.