4. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on a Variance request of the Angleton LDC, Land Development Code Section 23-5, E 3., for insufficient lot frontage for a Lot Split application, on property located at 1581 County Road 597/1583 Fig Lane, Angleton, Texas in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of Brazoria County.

[4. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on a Variance request of the Angleton LDC, Land Development Code Section 23-5, E 3., for insufficient lot frontage for a Lot Split application, on property located at 1581 County Road 597/1583 Fig Lane, Angleton, Texas in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of Brazoria County.]

ON TO PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ACTION ITEMS. ITEM NUMBER FOUR.

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON A VARIANCE REQUEST OF THE ANGLETON LDC LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 20 3-5E3 FOR INSUFFICIENT LOT FRONTAGE FOR A LOT. SPLIT APPLICATION ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1581 COUNTY ROAD 597 1583 FIG LANE, ANGLETON, TEXAS, IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION OF MISSOURI COUNTY.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS A VARIANCE OF OUR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE AS WELL AS THE LDC.

THIS ITEM ORIGINALLY CAME IN AS A VARIANCE BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, BUT AFTER CONSULTING WITH THE LEGAL WE ACTUALLY HAD TO REVERT IT. THROUGH THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND THEN ON TO COUNCIL.

THE PLANNING COMMISSION DID CONSIDER THIS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MONTH AND RECOMMENDED UNANIMOUSLY APPROVAL OF THIS VARIANCE.

ESSENTIALLY, WHAT THIS FAMILY IS DOING IS SPLITTING OFF A PROPERTY THAT HAS TWO HOMES ON IT.

THIS WOULD ALLOW THEM TO SHARE THE TWO LOTS WITH THE TWO SIBLINGS.

AND THAT'S THE DESIRE OF THE OWNER WHO IS HERE WITH ONE OF HIS DAUGHTERS.

SO MR. PIPER BRINGS THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU EXPRESSING THAT ONLY FOR THE FINANCIAL TRANSFER OF THE LOTS.

THEY HAVE NO WISH TO SELL THESE LOTS. IN THE FUTURE THEY WILL REMAIN IN THE FAMILY.

WE'VE GIVEN YOU ALL OF THE INFORMATION AND ALSO THE CRITERIA, WHICH BASICALLY PROVES THAT THERE IS NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE NEIGHBORING

[00:10:03]

PROPERTIES. THIS IS ETJ PROPERTY. OTHER THAN THAT IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF, WE'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER THAT.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING AND THEY ARE HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AS WELL.

COUNCIL MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND.

MOTION AND SECOND, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. WE ARE NOW IN A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM. STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION.

MOTION. CLOSE. PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND. MOTION AND SECOND, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. NOW OUT OF PUBLIC HEARING.

COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS? FOR THE RESIDENCES THAT ARE ON THE PROPERTY ARE.

THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY ADDITIONAL BUILDING. IT'S YOU.

IT'S IT'S AS IT IS WITH THE. THERE. I UNDERSTAND THERE ARE TWO DWELLINGS ON IT AND YOU'RE BASICALLY SPLITTING IT IN HALF, RIGHT? YES. AND THE RESULTING FRONTAGE ON THE FLAG LINE WILL BE APPROXIMATELY 30FT OR SO.

THE DRIVEWAY IS ACTUALLY ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE FRONT HOME.

AND IT WILL REMAIN AS SUCH. SO IT WOULD MAKE THE LOTS LEGAL ONCE THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED.

THEY WOULD PLAT THOSE AND MAKE SURE THE ADDRESSING MEETS THE COUNTY STANDARDS AND THEY SHOULD BE FINE FROM THERE.

COUNCIL. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO GRANT THE VARIANCE BASED ON THE EXISTING DWELLING.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN SARTIN.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN SMITH FOR APPROVAL. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? YOU DID SAY THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. UNANIMOUSLY.

YES, SIR. THANK YOU. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

[5. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and possible action on consideration of a substandard structure determination order for removal at 708-718 North Velasco Street, Highway 288-Business, within the City of Angleton, Texas. ]

ITEM NUMBER FIVE. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON CONSIDERATION OF A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE.

DETERMINATION. ORDER FOR REMOVAL AT 708 TO 718 NORTH OF ALASKA STREET, HIGHWAY 38.

BUSINESS WITHIN THE CITY OF ANGLETON, TEXAS. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS THE BEGINNING OF OUR PROCESS TO DEAL WITH THE SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE THAT'S BEEN DETERMINED AT 7087 18 NORTH VELASCO, IN WHICH MOST OF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE APARTMENT STRUCTURE, WHICH HAS BEEN THERE IN THIS CONDITION FOR QUITE SOME TIME PRIOR TO MY COMING HERE. BUT WE'VE BEEN SERVING THIS PROPERTY OVER THE PERIOD OF THE LAST FEW YEARS CONTACTING THE OWNERSHIP, LETTING THEM KNOW THAT THE BUILDING NEEDED TO BE BROUGHT UP TO CODE WITH OUR CURRENT PROCESS AND WHICH I DO HAVE SOME COPIES, BUT BASICALLY WHAT WE DO IS TRY TO, OF COURSE, EXHAUST THE EFFORTS TO GET THE VIOLATIONS CORRECTED WITH NO RESULT. WE SERVED THEM THIS LAST TIME IT WAS SIGNED AS A GREEN CARD.

IN TERMS OF THE OWNERSHIP AND THEN WE SET THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND ONCE IT'S ESTABLISHED AS A SUBSTANDARD STRUCTURE FOR CONDEMNATION, THE ORDER WILL BE PREPARED PER THE COUNCIL, WHICH WE'RE READY TO DO.

IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, I THINK THERE'S A REPRESENTATION FROM THE OWNERSHIP, WHICH COULD BASICALLY ADDRESS THE COUNCIL BASED ON SOME OF THE THINGS THAT NEED TO BE CORRECTED PER THE HOUSING MAINTENANCE CODE, AS WELL AS OUR BUILDING CODES.

FOR THE STRUCTURE, OUR CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS HERE AS WELL AS KYLE WHO IS SUPERVISOR OVER CODE ENFORCEMENT IN WHICH HE'S BEEN DEALING WITH THIS PROPERTY FOR QUITE SOME TIME. SO IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THEM THEY WOULD BE AVAILABLE AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING AS WELL.

SO THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. AND STAFF WILL COME BACK WITH LEGAL JUST TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE PATH MOVING FORWARD.

THE ORDER PER THE PROCEDURES WOULD ALLOW THE PROPERTY OWNER 30 DAYS TO ADDRESS ALL OF THE CONCERNS OF THE PROPERTY FROM A CODE ENFORCEMENT PERSPECTIVE. COUNCIL HAS THE LIBERTY TO GRANT THEM NO MORE THAN 90 DAYS TO DO THOSE CORRECTIONS.

COME UP WITH A PLAN. COME BACK TO COUNCIL. OTHER THAN THAT, STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT SOME ORDER BE PLACED TO THAT EFFECT.

WILL BE BACK. THANK YOU. MAKE A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

SECOND. MOTION AND SECOND, TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

[00:15:02]

OPPOSED. SAME SIGN. PUBLIC HEARING. ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THE SIDE OF THE PODIUM, STATE YOUR NAME AND YOUR POSITION. GO AHEAD.

MY NAME IS KEITH JACKSON MANAGEMENT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY THAT MANAGES THIS PROPERTY.

I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE REGARDING THIS.

I KNOW THAT THE OWNERSHIP IS. THIS PROPERTY IS LISTED ON MLS FOR SALE.

I'VE BEEN PERSONALLY WORKING WITH A BUYER BROKER THAT HAS SEVERAL INVESTORS INTERESTED IN THE PROPERTY, AND WE'RE WORKING TO MOVE, YOU KNOW, SELL THIS PROPERTY SO IT CAN BE AN ASSET TO THE CITY.

ANGLETON NOT A HINDRANCE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, I'LL BE MORE THAN GLAD TO ANSWER THEM.

WE'RE IN A PUBLIC HEARING. SO ONCE WE CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, I'LL HAVE YOU UP AND ASK THESE QUESTIONS. ANYONE ELSE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON FOR OR AGAINST THIS ITEM? PLEASE, PLEASE APPROACH THE PODIUM AND STATE YOUR NAME.

MAKE A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. WE ARE NOW AT A PUBLIC HEARING.

IF YOU'D LIKE TO GO TO THE PODIUM, I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR YOU. YES, SIR.

OKAY. SO YOU'RE REPRESENTING THE GROUP TONIGHT.

I JUST WANT TO ASK WHAT'S BEEN THE HOLD UP? WHAT'S TAKEN? IT'S THIS IS YEARS AND YEARS OF NEGLECT. THE WE HAVE CONCENTRATED OUR EFFORTS IN OTHER HOMES THAT WE HAVE UNDER OUR MANAGEMENT IN ANGLETON. I LOOKED UP THE NUMBERS.

SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS THAT WE HAVE IMPROVED.

THEY'VE ALSO BUILT A SUBDIVISION ON THE SHANNON AND TRACY LOTS.

SO I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT NUMBER OF THOSE HOUSES.

IT'S PUSHING 20. AND IT IS JUST TO WHERE WE'RE IMPROVING THE STARTING WITH THE BEST AND WORKING TO THE WORST.

AND WE JUST HAVEN'T GOTTEN TO THAT YET. AND LIKE I SAID, IT'S SEVERAL MILLION DOLLARS.

I THINK I LOOKED UP THE TOTAL EXPENSE IN ANGLETON SPENT IN THE LAST FIVE YEARS IS LIKE $5.3 MILLION.

I GUESS THE ISSUE I HAVE THERE IS HOW MUCH OF THAT 5.3 MILLION IS IN.

YOU KIND OF MENTIONED IN THE NEWER STUFF THAT YOU HAVE IN YOUR WORSE CONDITION, HOMES OR PROPERTIES ARE GETTING FURTHER AND FURTHER BEHIND AND FURTHER NEGLECTED.

SEEMS LIKE THE MONEY SHOULD BE THE OTHER WAY INTO THE ONES THAT ARE FALLING APART THE MOST.

WE HAVEN'T, WE HAVEN'T. WE HAVEN'T STARTED WITH THE BEST.

AND I MEAN, WE, WE, WE'VE TAKEN HOUSES THAT ARE BUILT IN THE 40S AND 50S AND TOTALLY RENOVATED THEM AND BROUGHT THEM UP TO A HIGH STANDARD.

AND IT'S, IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SITTING THERE SAYING, OKAY, IT'S GOING TO TAKE THIS MUCH TO DO THIS ONE AND IT'S GOING TO TAKE THIS MUCH TO DO THIS ONE. AND WE SAY, OKAY, THIS IS THE BETTER WAY TO GO AT THIS TIME.

AND WE JUST PRIORITIZE THEM BY THE AMOUNT OF WORK THEY WERE GOING TO TAKE.

NOT SAYING THAT THE NEW HOUSING WAS TOTALLY SEPARATE FROM THE.

THE MANAGEMENT COMPANY. YOU KNOW, ON OUR ON OUR WORK.

SO BUT WE'VE RENOVATED HOUSES ON SAN FELIPE AND WIMBERLEY.

THAT THAT WHOLE AREA RIGHT THERE. THEY OWNED SEVERAL HOUSES OVER THERE. I MEAN, TO ME IT'S YOUR BUSINESS MODEL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO STAND IN FRONT OF YOU AND TELL YOU HOW TO RUN YOUR BUSINESS. BUT TO ME, IT'S NOT QUALITY OR QUANTITY. IT'S QUALITY. AND I MEAN, YOU KEEP ADDING MORE AND MORE HOUSES, BUT KEEP GETTING FURTHER AND FURTHER BEHIND ON SOME OF THESE OTHER ONES.

DO YOU AGREE THAT THIS PROPERTY SHOULD REALLY GO TO THE GO DOWN TO THE GROUND? I'VE I'VE WENT IN THE PROPERTY IN THE LAST TWO MONTHS SEVERAL TIMES.

IT IS SALVAGEABLE PROPERTY. IT'S NOT. IT'S GOING TO TAKE A A VERY MOTIVATED PERSON TO BRING IT UP TO A STANDARD BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO REWIRE IT, REPLUMB IT ALL NEW.

IT'S GOING TO BE A MAJOR RENOVATION TO KEEP THE PROPERTY AS IT STANDS TODAY.

YES. THAT'S A YES OR THAT'S A NO. A NO TO WHAT QUESTION DO YOU AGREE THAT IT SHOULD GO DOWN TO THE GROUND? NO.

I SAY IT'S SALVAGEABLE. DO YOU HAVE A MOTIVATED BUYER? WE ARE WORKING ON THAT AS I'VE TALKED TO THE BROKER OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS.

AND SO YOU DON'T HAVE A CONTRACT AT THIS? I DON'T HAVE A CONTRACT AT THIS TIME.

[00:20:02]

AND I KNOW THAT THE THAT THE OWNERSHIP WAS ASKING FOR A SPECIFIC TIME FRAME TO LIKE I SAID, IT'S LISTED ON MLS. WE'VE GOT A WE HAD A REAL ESTATE AGENT THERE YESTERDAY, AND WE ARE LOOKING TO SELL THE PROPERTY TO SOMEONE WHO IS LOOKING TO IMPROVE IT RIGHT AWAY INSTEAD OF.

PUSHING IT A LITTLE FURTHER DOWN THE ROAD. IT'S A BLIGHT ON THIS CITY AND HAS BEEN FOR DECADES.

A BLOCK AWAY FROM COURTHOUSE THAT JUST GOT COMPLETELY RENOVATED.

AND BUSINESSES THAT ARE TRYING TO MAKE IT IN THIS TOWN.

LOCALLY OWNED BUSINESSES. THIS HAS BEEN A BLIGHT FOR DECADES.

AND I'LL TELL YOU, THE PROBLEM I HAVE WITH IT IS THAT I'M HEARING ABOUT THIS LARGE INVESTMENT OF MONEY WITHIN THE CITY.

BUT I MEAN, IT WOULDN'T HAVE TAKEN A WHOLE LOT TO, TO RAISE THIS OR JUST DECIDE THAT, YOU KNOW, THIS WAS NOT GOING TO BE A PROFITABLE ITEM WITHIN WITHIN A PORTFOLIO AND TO MOVE ON FROM IT.

SO I DON'T REALLY UNDERSTAND WHERE THE INVESTMENT YOU MADE IN THE CITY COMES INTO PLAY BECAUSE THAT'S YOUR BUSINESS.

THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE DOING FOR PROFIT. BUT AS A, AS A PROPERTY OWNER IN THIS TOWN OR MANAGEMENT COMPANY WITHIN THIS TOWN.

YOU HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO THE CITIZENRY OF THIS TOWN TO KEEP UP THESE PROPERTIES.

YOU UNDERSTAND THAT, CORRECT? EXCUSE ME. YES, SIR.

SO TO ME, THE THE MONEY THAT YOU'RE PUTTING IN THESE OTHER PROPERTIES FOR PROFITS AND MATERIAL.

AND HOW MANY YEARS HAVE YOU OWNED THIS PROPERTY? I DO NOT KNOW.

THE WHEN THEY PURCHASED THAT PROPERTY. SO MORE YEARS THAN YOU.

MORE YEARS THAN I'VE BEEN THERE. 2007. YEAH. THANK YOU.

ALMOST 20 YEARS. AND YOU HAVEN'T DONE ANYTHING WITH IT IN 20 YEARS? NO IT'S NOT. IT WAS OCCUPIED UP UNTIL ABOUT. MAYBE FOUR YEARS AGO.

I DON'T KNOW WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME IT WAS OCCUPIED? DO WE KNOW? OH. LEGALLY OCCUPIED? YEAH. LEGALLY OCCUPIED.

YEAH, I CAN LOOK IT UP. AND I DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO LOOK IT UP NOW.

BUT I KNOW IT'S BEEN. I WENT TO WORK THERE IN 2018 AND IT WAS TENANTS THERE IN 2018.

UTILITY DEPARTMENT RECORDS SHOW THE UTILITIES HAVE NOT BEEN SERVICED SINCE 2017.

AND EVEN BEFORE THAT, IT WAS IT WAS IN PRETTY BAD SHAPE.

I MEAN, IF YOU'RE BEING FAIR AND HONEST. YEAH.

I'M NOT ARGUING THE FACT THAT LOOKS LIKE I SAW THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE.

GOD BLESS THEM. YOU KNOW, THEY WERE MAKING, I'M SURE, THE BEST THEY COULD AND THAT'S THE BEST THEY COULD AFFORD. SO I'M NOT CRITICAL. BUT IT WASN'T LIKE, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF EFFORT WAS BEING MADE TO, TO MAINTAIN A.

JUST TO MAINTAIN THE PLACE SO. WELL, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING BEFORE TODAY.

CORRECT? YEAH. AND SO YOU COULD SEE OUR CONCERN, RIGHT? BECAUSE IT BECOMES HOLLOW, RIGHT? IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE YOU DON'T HAVE A CONTRACT.

NOT AT THIS TIME THAT I KNOW OF. THIS COUNCIL DOES NOT WANT TO GET ANYBODY'S BUILDINGS DOWN OR HOUSES DOWN.

WE WANT TO WORK WITH ANYBODY WHO WANTS TO GET THEIR PROPERTIES UP TO CODE.

BUT WE FEEL LIKE IN THIS CASE AND YOU'RE NOT ALONE IN THIS, THERE'S A FEW OTHERS TOO.

WE HAVE BEEN, YOU KNOW, STALLED AND STYMIED. AND JUST LIKE I WON'T SAY LIED TO BECAUSE I'M NOT GOING TO SAY THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE DONE.

BUT OTHERS, OTHERS HAVE KEPT THE BALL ROLLING AND ROLLING AND ROLLING AND NOT TAKING CARE OF WHAT THEY NEED TO TAKE CARE OF.

AND I MEAN, I HATE TO SAY IT, BUT LAKE JACKSON MANAGEMENT IS ONE OF OUR OFFENDERS.

ALL. HOW MANY OPEN CITATIONS DO YOU HAVE WITH LAKE JACKSON? THERE'S ONLY A FEW RIGHT NOW. THIS IS THE PRIMARY ONE.

I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT OTHER FEW YOU HAVE BECAUSE I AM NOT.

TO MY KNOWLEDGE. I'M THE ONE THAT DEALS WITH THE CITY ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS FOR THE MOST.

THE MAJORITY OF THE PART. I DO NOT KNOW OF ANY OTHER ACTIVE CITATIONS AT THIS TIME.

ONE OF YOU TWO WANT TO SPEAK ON THAT? IT'S COLOR CODED.

CAN YOU GO TO THE PODIUM, PLEASE? WE DON'T HAVE THE I MEAN THAT EXACT INFORMATION WITH US AT THE MOMENT, BUT WE WOULD BE GLAD TO GET THAT FOR YOU. HOW MANY WERE YOU UP TO LAST YEAR WITH ON BUILDINGS ONLY

[00:25:01]

OR ALL ANYTHING WITH CODE ENFORCEMENT? I'M GOING TO LET YOU SPEAK TO THAT, PAUL, BECAUSE HE'S APPROXIMATELY EIGHT. I'D LOVE TO SEE THAT LIST.

WE CAN DEFINITELY MAKE SURE YOU GET THAT LIST BECAUSE WE WANT THESE PROPERTIES, YOU KNOW? AND YOU KNOW, NOT TO TAKE AWAY, LIKE Y'ALL SAID, WITH THESE APARTMENTS.

I MEAN, WE'VE HEARD LOTS OF EXCUSES ARE GOING TO DO OR NOT DO OR, YOU KNOW, SO, I MEAN, WE JUST HAVE TO FINALLY, YOU KNOW, WE GIVE A LOT OF TIME TO TRY, YOU KNOW, OF COURSE WE WANT SOMEBODY TO FIX SOMETHING UP OR IMPROVE IT, BUT IT'S NOT HAPPENING AT ALL. AND IT'S JUST WE'VE BEEN IN IT. THEY'VE LET US IN IT PROBABLY A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO.

GOT PICTURES, GOT, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALL ORIGINAL.

IT'S IT'S JUST. WOOD, YOU KNOW, I MEAN, YOU CAN REHAB ANYTHING IF YOU THROW ENOUGH AT IT, BUT.

AND IT JUST CONTINUES TO GET WORSE, AS Y'ALL SEE.

SO I'D LIKE TO ASK, WHAT IS THE COMPANY'S POSITION? WHAT ARE YOU ASKING US FOR? ANYTHING. I. 120 DAYS TO SELL THE PROPERTY.

NO, I THINK THERE'S A QUESTION AS FAR AS HOW MANY DAYS YOU CAN GIVE THEM.

AND I THINK OTIS HAS THAT. OR GRADY DOES. 90, 90 DAYS.

THEN THEY HAVE TO. IF IT GOES OVER 90, IT HAS.

THEY HAVE TO SEND A PLAN WITH GUIDEPOST AND MILE MARKERS ON WHAT HAPPENS.

IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN BEFORE 30 DAYS, BECAUSE YOU HAVE TO GIVE THEM AT LEAST 30 DAYS NOTICE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO NOTIFY.

IS THERE A MORTGAGE ON IT? ON THE PROPERTY? WE PROBABLY DON'T HAVE TO SEND IT TO THE MORTGAGE COMPANY.

WE HAVE WE HAVE SIX PAGES OF DUE PROCESS WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH.

IT'S NOT A QUICK AND DIRTY. THE BULLDOZERS ARE NOT GOING TO BE OUT THERE TOMORROW, BUT THEY CAN BE OUT THERE IN 31 DAYS.

OUR POSITION. WE WANT TO SEE THE BUILDINGS TORN DOWN.

WE DON'T WANT TO SEE THEM TRY TO SOMEONE TRY TO REHAB THEM BECAUSE.

WE'RE SO FAR GONE ON THIS ROAD. IF THIS HAS HAPPENED, 2018, MAYBE.

BUT AT THIS POINT, I MEAN, IT'S NICE HERE. AND I SAT HERE ON THIS COUNCIL BEFORE WHERE WE HAD SOMEBODY TRYING TO REHAB AN APARTMENT, AND THE GUY WAS LITERALLY OUT THERE REMOVING BRICK BY BRICK BY BRICK BY HAND, TRYING TO DO IT HIMSELF.

AND IT JUST KEPT THE CLOCK ROLLING. THAT'S WE'RE PAST THAT POINT.

I'M OKAY WITH YOU TRYING TO SELL THE PROPERTY, BUT THE ULTIMATE GOAL HAS TO HAPPEN HERE.

IT HAS TO COME DOWN. UNDERSTAND? IT'S NOT US.

WE'VE BEEN GIVEN A DIRECTIVE FROM THE ELECTORATE THAT WE'RE GOING TO CLEAN THE CITY UP.

AND THIS IS PART OF IT. THIS IS ON THE MAIN ROAD.

I UNDERSTAND EVERY JUROR, EVERYBODY THAT WORKS AT THE COUNTY COMES AND GOES FROM THERE.

THERE ARE LOCAL BUSINESSES ARE TRYING VERY, VERY HARD TO MAKE A PROFIT.

AND THIS I SAW THIS BLIGHT ON THE CITY HAS BEEN THERE FOR YEARS.

IF WE'RE GOING TO TRY TO REALLY DIVE INTO OUR ECONOMIC GROWTH, TO TAKE THE BURDEN OFF THE TAXPAYER ITSELF AND HAVE MORE OF A TOWN THAT IS DRIVEN RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL AND ALL THAT STUFF.

WE'VE GOT TO CLEAN IT UP AND THAT THAT THAT BEING ON THE MAIN ROAD TO THIS TOWN IS A HUGE, HUGE THORN IN ITS SIDE. I THINK WE HAVE TO BE REALISTIC. I THINK YOU'RE GETTING THE. AND THE POSITION SEEMS PRETTY UNANIMOUS THAT.

AND I'LL SPEAK FOR MYSELF. BUT IT DOES SEEM LIKE OTHERS AGREE WITH ME THAT EVEN IF WE ALLOWED YOU THE OPPORTUNITY TO TO SOMEHOW FIND A SELLER OR BUYER.

EXCUSE ME. YOU STILL GOT TO COME DOWN. I MEAN, I THINK THAT SHOULD BE KNOWN.

WELL, THE TO ME, THE PROCESS STARTS OVER AT THAT POINT BECAUSE THEN THERE'S ANOTHER BUYER AND WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING AGAIN.

AND YOU KNOW, I AGREE WITH YOU. THAT'S THE CONCERN IS IF WE JUST KICK THE CAN TO ANOTHER BUYER.

BUT THAT'S WHY I'M SAYING GO AHEAD AND JUST CONDITION IT THAT THE CONDITION IS THAT THE PURCHASER KNOW.

[00:30:08]

IS THAT SOMETHING WE CAN ENFORCE? YES. JUST TELL ME HOW MUCH TIME YOU WANT TO GIVE, AND WE'LL DO AN ORDER THAT SAYS, IF YOU DON'T DO IT BY THIS DATE, IT'S COMING DOWN.

DONE WITH THE PLAN. I'M OKAY WITH GIVING THEM 90 DAYS AS LONG AS THE BUILDING COMES DOWN.

SO YOU'RE SAYING REGARDLESS, REGARDLESS OF THE IF WE HAVE A PERSON THAT'S INTERESTED IN REVAMPING THAT BUILDING, YOU'RE SAYING REGARDLESS OF THAT FACT, YOU'RE WANTING THE BUILDING DOWN.

CORRECT. THERE WAS A TIME TO DO THIS, AND IT WAS WAY BEFORE.

I'M JUST MAKING SURE I'M CLEAR ON. AND KYLE'S ALREADY, YOU KNOW, HE'S OUR EYES.

WE HAVE TO TRUST HIM. HE'S BEEN OUT THERE AND BEEN TOGETHER FOR A WHILE, SO.

LIKE I SAID, WE NEVER WANT TO SEE THIS HAPPEN.

WE. I THINK THIS COUNCIL HAS ONLY TAKEN ACTION ON MAYBE 2 OR 3 OTHER PROPERTIES WHERE WE'VE TORN IT DOWN.

BUT I DON'T KNOW THIS ONE. THERE ARE SOME TIMES WHERE I LIKE TO SEE THIS KIND OF STUFF.

THIS HAPPENS TO BE ONE OF THEM. I'M JUST GOING TO BE COMPLETELY HONEST.

I HAVE NO PROBLEMS GIVING YOU 90 DAYS TO FIND A BUYER FOR THE PROPERTY THAT THAT WANTS TO REINVEST ON THAT PROPERTY.

BUT I'M ALSO THE SAME MINDSET THAT THEY'VE GOT TO COME DOWN.

I THINK I WAS PRETTY CHEAP. DID YOU? THAT WAS PRETTY CLEAR TOO.

DOCTOR GRADY IN CONVERSATION. CORRECT? NO, SIR.

WE DIDN'T HAVE THAT CONVERSATION. WAS ASKING TO HAVE TIME FOR A BUYER.

HE WANTED FOUR MONTHS TO THEN TALK WITH GREAT WITH OTIS.

AND THE LAW APPARENTLY ONLY GIVES THEM 90 DAYS.

SO. IF YOU DO AN ORDER NOW AND YOU SAY 90 DAYS AND IT'S COMING DOWN IF THEY CAN CLOSE THE DEAL IN UNDER 90 DAYS, AND I DOUBT THAT HAPPENS.

BUT IF THEY CAN CLOSE THE DEAL, THE NEW OWNER CAN COME IN HERE AND ASK FOR MERCY.

ANYBODY WHO WOULD BUY THE PROPERTY WOULD BE ABLE TO CLOSE, WOULD BE ABLE WOULD BE CLEARED TO CLOSE QUICKLY BECAUSE THEY WOULD BRING CASH TO THE TABLE. NOBODY'S GOING TO LEND ON THAT. OH, RIGHT.

YOU'RE RIGHT. YEAH. GREAT. I MEAN, I MEAN, WE'RE JUST BEING HONEST HERE.

WE'RE MORE LIKELY TO BE A CASH BUYER. CORRECT. IF WE WERE TO PROCEED WITH THAT AND THE NEW BUYER APPROACH US AND ASK FOR LENIENCY OR PLAN, WHAT COULD WE WHAT RESTRICTIONS COULD WE PUT ON THAT? ANOTHER JUST LIKE YOU WOULD IF THE NEW OWNER WAS STANDING HERE TODAY.

YOU GOT X AMOUNT OF TIME. YOU HAVE TO SHOW US.

YOU HAVE TO GIVE US THE PLAN. WE'RE NOT GOING TO CREATE IT FOR YOU.

YOU HAVE TO. WELL, I MEAN, JUST LOOKING AT THE PICTURES WITH THE PLANTS GROWING OUT OF THE AIR CONDITIONERS UP IN THE ELECTRICAL.

I MEAN, YOU HAVE TO HAVE IT, WHATEVER THE MILE MARKERS ARE YOU WANT.

BUT YOU KNOW, 30 DAYS IT HAS TO BE. ROOF HAS TO BE CLEARED.

PULLING STUFF OUT OF THE AIR. 60 DAYS ELECTRICAL, 90 DAYS PLUMBING.

NONE OF THAT HAPPENS. HE BOUGHT LAND. HE DIDN'T BUY A BUILDING.

HE MAY WANT US TO. TO SPEND THE MONEY TO TEAR IT DOWN.

BUT WE WOULD PUT A LIEN ON IT. SO. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THE ZONING.

WHAT IS THE CURRENT ZONING? THAT ONE IS C G. IT IS C G.

YES. RIGHT. YES. SO IT'S GRANDFATHERED. YEAH.

IT AUTOMATICALLY GOES COMMERCIAL ONE SIDE. YES, THAT'D BE PRETTY WIDE OPEN FOR, YOU KNOW, OFFICE OR. AND THAT WAS ONE THING WE HAD LOOKED INTO WAS PUTTING IN AN OFFICE COMPLEX THERE.

AND IT WAS THE VERY, YOU KNOW, WE HAD THE, THE SETBACKS ON EACH SIDE OF THE ROAD FROM THE MAIN ROAD.

AND IT WAS JUST GOING TO SHRINK THAT TO A VERY SMALL COMPLEX, VERY.

YOU CAN ALWAYS GO THROUGH PLANNING AND ZONING AND ASK FOR.

CORRECT. SO, I MEAN, I THINK THIS COUNCIL IS PRETTY OPEN TO OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROWTH. WE'RE NOT IT'S NOT WE WOULD LOVE FOR SOMETHING OF VALUE TO JOIN US.

YOU KNOW, IF, IF IT TAKES A MODIFICATION TO OUR ZONING FOR SETBACKS OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, YOU KNOW, THAT COULD BE A DISCUSSION. BUT TO ME, WE'RE JUST GETTING SO FAR AHEAD OF OURSELVES.

HYPOTHETICALLY SPEAKING. LET'S JUST SEE WHAT REALLY HAPPENS.

[00:35:04]

I'D LIKE TO SEE HIM GET 90 DAYS AND IT COMES DOWN.

IF YOU FIND THE CASH BUYER AND THEY WANT TO COME. APPEAL TO US. WE'LL TAKE THAT ISSUE UP IF AND WHEN IT EVER HAPPENS.

BUT THAT'S THAT'S MY POSITION.

YES. SETBACKS. THAT IS TECHSTUFF PROPERTY ALONG THAT HIGHWAY.

WE STILL MODIFY SETBACKS. WE HAVE TO GO THROUGH TEXTILE ON THAT.

IT'LL GO THROUGH THEM JUST LIKE THEY'RE DOING.

NO, IT'S SNOW CONES IS GOING TO BUILD A NEW BUILDING.

WE MET WITH THEY'RE HAVING TO DO THE SAME THING WITH TECH STOCK, BUT THEY'RE REALLY RECEPTIVE TO THERE BECAUSE THEY HAVE FRONT PARKING KIND OF ON THE HIGH OFF THE HIGHWAY. SO IT'S JUST IT GOES THROUGH TEXDOT, BUT THEY SEEM LIKE IT'S, YOU KNOW, VERY RECEPTIVE TO IT.

AND SO, YES, THERE IS POSSIBILITIES HERE. CAN I ASK YOU, WHAT ABOUT THE MASSAGE? THAT'S THAT'S STRICTLY THE CITY, RIGHT? YES. AND I WANT YOU TO CORRECT THE ZONING IS ACTUALLY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.

THAT'S SURROUNDED BY ALL COMMERCIAL. THAT'S WHAT I SUSPECTED.

SO IT STILL DOESN'T CHANGE MY OPINION. I STILL FEEL LIKE WE'RE.

YEAH, IT WOULD BE IT WOULD BE VERY EASY TO REZONE BECAUSE EVERYTHING'S SURROUNDED ACROSS THE STREET.

YEAH. AND DOWN AND IT'S ALL CG, BUT IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REZONED BACK ON ASH.

CORRECT. THAT'S MY CONCERN. IT DON'T HAVE TO BE.

I MEAN, I THING KIND OF LIKE WE SAID. I MEAN, WE'RE STILL I MEAN, A NEW BUYER, A NEW WHATEVER COULD LOOK AT THAT.

AND BUT, YOU KNOW, WITH THE BUILDING DID HAVE GET AN ESTIMATE JUST SO WE WOULD HAVE AN IDEA FROM A CONTRACTOR WE'VE USED WITH THE SLAB GONE, YOU'RE LOOKING TWEEN.

4142. COUNCIL ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO GIVE THEM 90 DAYS CONDITION ON THE PROPERTY BEING.

RAISED, I GUESS IS THE BEST WAY TO PUT IT. SO YOU DECLARE IT SUBSTANDARD? CORRECT. AND THAT THE ORDER BE DRAFTED AND SIGNED BY THE MAYOR.

CORRECT. ALL THE ABOVE. SECOND. MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND BY COUNCILMAN. SARTIN. ALSO, I WANT TO BE FAIR TO LAKE JACKSON MANAGEMENT AND SAY YOU HAVE 90 DAYS ACCORDING TO THE MOTION. AND YOU ALSO HAVE THOSE OPEN ITEMS. AND MR. PAUL WILL MAKE SURE THAT YOU ALL GET A COPY OF ALL THOSE.

YOU GET THOSE TOO. SO THAT AMONG OTHER PROPERTIES.

THAT'S WHAT I'M SAYING. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS GETS ALL PROPERTIES GET BROUGHT UP TO CODE, AND WE APPRECIATE THE INVESTMENT IN ANGLETON.

BUT WE HAVE TO BE WE HAVE TO FOLLOW THE RULES AND ORDINANCES.

SO. ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING ELSE? ALL FOR THE VOTE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. I. I ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR COMING OUT TONIGHT.

THANK YOU. WHAT I UNDERSTAND IS A 90 DAY. OKAY.

READY? OKAY. 90 DAYS FROM THE DAY THE ORDER SIGNED.

IT WON'T BE SIGNED TODAY. OKAY. AND WHEN WE GET A COPY, WE'RE REQUIRED TO SEND YOU A COPY.

OKAY, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. THE DEATH PENALTY.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX. DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON USE OF SURPLUS FUNDS FROM ENGINE TWO TOWARDS A NEW TANKER AND SURPLUS FUNDS FROM OLD BRUSH.

[6. Discussion and possible action on using surplus funds from Engine 2 towards a new tanker and surplus funds from old Brush 3 towards a new utility truck for the Angleton Fire Department.]

THREE TOWARDS A NEW TRUCK. UTILITY TRUCK ANGLETON FIRE DEPARTMENT.

GOOD EVENING MAYOR. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL CHIEF GARCIA WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I FIRST WANT TO START OFF WITH. I HAVE A QUESTION. IF IT'S POSSIBLE FOR ITEM NUMBER SIX.

IF IT'S ALLOWED, CAN WE TAKE OFF THAT LAST PART OF THAT SENTENCE? IF IT'S NOT, WE CAN CONTINUE. I JUST HAD SOME MISINTERPRETATION OF SOME FUNDS, BUT IT'S OKAY.

[00:40:02]

DEALING WITH THE OLD BRUSH THREE WE CAN TAKE ACTION WITHOUT TAKING ACTION SPECIFICALLY ON THAT UTILITY TRUCK.

BUT THAT'S WHAT YOU LIKE. YES, SIR. AND WE'LL COME BACK FOR IT.

OKAY. SO TO CONTINUE WITH ACTION NUMBER WITH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX, DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION OF USING SURPLUS FUNDS FROM ENGINE TWO TOWARDS A NEW TANKER. WE WOULD LIKE TO USE THE TRADE IN VALUE FOR ENGINE TWO TOWARDS THE NEW TANKER, WHICH IS ALSO AN ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

THAT IS 82,000. HOW MUCH AGAIN? 82.

SO ENGINE TWO IS $82,000 SURPLUS. YES, SIR. TRADING.

TAKE THAT 82 AND YOU APPLY IT TO. ITEM NUMBER SEVEN.

YES, SIR. NEW TANKER. THE NEW TANKER IS ITEM AGENDA SEVEN. YES, SIR. I'LL MAKE SURE I FOLLOW ALONG WITH WHAT Y'ALL ARE DOING HERE.

UNDERSTOOD. AND ARE WE GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE UTILITY TRUCK AT ALL? NO, SIR. WE'LL COME BACK TO THAT. COME BACK TO THAT.

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY THAT? OH, WE'LL PRESENT IT AT THE NEXT AGENDA MEETING.

OKAY? YEAH. NOT TODAY. OKAY. YES, SIR. I BELIEVE YOU.

32,000 LEFT OVER FOUR. OH, CAN YOU REPEAT THAT? I DON'T THINK THAT'S SURPLUS. IS 82,000, RIGHT? YES, SIR. AND HE'S APPLYING. YOU'RE APPLYING THAT TO THE TANKER, RIGHT? YES, SIR. THERE'S THERE'S A THERE'S A THERE'S A THERE'S A COMMA BEHIND THREE NUMBERS ON THAT ONE.

RIGHT. MR.. FINANCE, I'M LOOKING AT THE BUDGET AMOUNT SAYS 50,000.

SO I'M LIKE, THAT WAS FOR THE UTILITY. OKAY, MOVE ON TO ITEM SEVEN.

AND I THINK I THINK WE'RE DONE WITH WE'RE DONE WITH THIS ONE. WE'RE GOING ON. YES.

THIS IS THERE'S BEEN AN AUDIBLE CALL I THINK IS WHAT WE'RE SAYING.

SO 80, 80, SOME ODD THOUSAND OUT OF THE FIVE.

I'M JUST MAKING SURE THERE'S NO ACTION THAT NEEDS TO BE TAKEN FOR SIX BEFORE I GO TO SEVEN. BUT THAT'S FINE. WE'LL GO SEVEN AT NUMBER SEVEN.

DISCUSSION POSSIBLE ACTION ON APPROVING A PROPOSAL WITH SIT INS. MARTIN. EMERGENCY GROUP FOR A NEW ANGLETON FIRE DEPARTMENT TANKER IN THE AMOUNT OF

[7. Discussion and possible action on approving a proposal with Siddons Martin Emergency Group for a new Angleton Fire Department Tanker in the amount of $1,176,673.62. ]

$0.62. YES, SIR. NOW, THAT PRICE RIGHT THERE IS INCLUDING THE 82,000 FROM THE TRADE IN VALUE FOR TWO.

THIS WILL BE WE'LL PUT 582,000 AS A DOWN PAYMENT USING ESG FUNDS, AND THEN IT WOULD BE FINANCED THROUGH THE CITY AND WILL BE PAID USING ESG FUNDS TO THE CITY UNDER THE CITY NAME. WHERE IS SUSIE? SUSIE IS ON A BOAT, PROBABLY ON A WATCHING IT ON THE INTERNET AND GOING.

GREEN. SUSIE GREEN WITH THE MARGARITA. I HAVE.

I RECEIVED A TEXT MESSAGE YET AND THIS REMINDS ME OF WHEN I BOUGHT A TRUCK LAST SUMMER.

SUSIE WAS SENDING IN REINFORCEMENTS. IT'S LOOPY.

IT'S JUST YOU. LOOPY. IT'S JUST ME. IT'S YOU AND I.

THE QUESTION. RIGHT? HOW ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR IT? HOW ARE WE GOING TO FIND IT? ARE WE GOING TO PAY FOR IT? FOR FINANCING.

I THINK THIS IS THE SAME TRUCK THAT WE HAVE. $500,000 THAT WE'RE GOING TO PUT DOWN.

CORRECT. YES, SIR. AND YOU WANT TO PUT 82,000 ON THAT AS WELL? YES, SIR. SO WE DO HAVE 500,000 TO PUT DOWN ON THE TRUCK.

THAT'S FROM THE SD FUNDS. YES, SIR. YOU'RE COMMITTING THAT ALL THE ESG FUNDS IN THE FUTURE PERIODS WILL BE GOING TO THIS FUND. FUND IT TO COVER THE. YES, SIR. CONTRACT AMOUNT.

THIS HAS BEEN IN THE MAKING FOR THREE YEARS. THIS IS THE THIRD YEAR OF THIS.

ESD GAVE US AN OVERAGE. SCOTT, DID YOU TAKE. GIVE US A LITTLE BIT OF A TIMELINE. AND THEN ALSO, IF YOU GUYS COULD SPEAK ON, ON KIND OF THE PACE PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND, AND WHAT YOU HAVE COMING IN ISD WISE SO THAT WE UNDERSTAND.

YEAH. SO, SO TO GIVE YOU SOME TIMELINE BACK ON MY LAST YEAR AS CHIEF, WE STARTED DOWN THIS ROAD.

ISD WAS GOING TO GIVE US THEY GAVE US AN OVERAGE FOR A DOWN PAYMENT.

[00:45:02]

WE WENT DOWN THE ROAD OF FINDING THE TRUCK. WE COULDN'T FIND ANY TRUCKS THAT THEY WANTED 50% DOWN OR MORE.

THIS WENT ON TO THE NEXT YEAR, WHICH THEY GAVE US ANOTHER OVERAGE.

SO THAT'S WHERE THE 500,000 COMES FROM OVER THE LAST TWO YEARS.

OKAY. THE 82,000 IS FROM ENGINE TWO. IF Y'ALL REMEMBER ENGINE TWO.

ENGINE TWO IS THE ONE THAT HAD THE BLOWN MOTOR AND WE REPLACED IT.

IT BLEW UP AGAIN AND WE REPLACED IT. AND IT'S BEEN A LIMIT EVER SINCE.

THAT COST US ABOUT 67,000 TO DO THAT. SO THEY'RE GIVING US THE 82,000 TO OFFSET THAT, BASICALLY.

IT'S THE SAME COMPANY. THE SAME COMPANY. I UNDERSTAND.

YEAH. SO WHAT THE SSD HAS AGREED TO IN OUR CONTRACT.

THE SSD HAS AGREED TO FUND THE PAYMENTS OF THIS TRUCK OVER THE NEXT SEVERAL YEARS.

UNTIL THE TRUCK'S PAID FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE 1.17.

DO WE HAVE THAT IN WRITING? YES, IT'S IN THE CONTRACT.

ARE THESE THE PEOPLE YOU BROUGHT TRUCKS FROM WITH THE BAD ENGINES? IT IS THE IT IS THE PEOPLE THAT REPLACE THE ENGINE.

THAT'S CORRECT. IT WENT BAD. THAT'S CORRECT. IT'S NOW A LIMIT.

THAT'S CORRECT. AND THAT GENTLEMAN NO LONGER.

WELL, GENTLEMAN NO LONGER WORKS FOR THAT COMPANY.

FOUND A NEW OPPORTUNITY. OKAY. AND YOU GUYS ARE COMFORTABLE WITH PURCHASING THIS FROM THEM.

AND THE DEAL THAT THEY'VE WORKED OUT AND THEIR ABILITY TO PROVIDE SERVICE, FOR SURE.

I MEAN, IT'S A GOOD TRUCK. IT'S A REPUTABLE COMPANY.

LIKE I SAID, WHAT HAPPENED WITH THE COMPANY WITH THE THE WHOLE ENGINE ORDEAL? THE COMPANY WAS NOT AWARE OF THAT DEAL. I MEAN, IT WAS KIND OF AN UNDER THE TABLE TYPE DEAL, REALLY. SO THAT WAS THE GENTLEMAN NO LONGER WORKS THERE.

WOW. SO. I THINK I KNOW WHERE THAT WENT. THIS IS IF YOU ALL REMEMBER, THIS IS I MEAN, IT TOOK US ALMOST TWO YEARS TO GET THE TRUCK BACK. WE WENT THROUGH LEGAL. WE WERE. IT WAS IT WAS A MESS.

COUNCIL. HOW LONG WILL WE BE PAYING? YOU SAID THAT.

SO? SO THAT. SO WE WON'T WE WON'T START A LOAN PROCESS FOR TWO YEARS.

RIGHT? IT'S A TWO YEAR DELIVERY. SO WE PUT THE DOWN PAYMENT.

NOW WE'RE TWO YEARS FROM GETTING THIS TRUCK AND SO WE START THE LOAN PROCESS IN THAT TWO YEARS, AND YOU JUST MAKE DO WITH WHAT YOU HAVE UNTIL YOU GET THIS NEW.

YES. SO BASICALLY, SO, SO JUST TO FILL YOU IN.

SO WE BUILT THIS STRUCTURE. WE'VE GOT A 2000 GALLON TANK RIGHT NOW.

SD CAME TO US A WHILE BACK AND ASKED, WELL, 3 OR 4 YEARS AGO, ASKED WHAT WE NEEDED.

WE NEEDED A BIGGER TANKER FOR SD. WELL, WHEN THEY AGREED, WE BUILT THIS TRUCK AS AN ENGINE SLASH TANKER.

SO THIS TRUCK'S GOING TO RUN, IT'S GOING TO RUN OUR STREETS, IT'S GOING TO RUN HOUSE FIRES.

IT'S A 3000 GALLON TANK VERSUS A 2000 GALLON TANK.

SO IT'S GOING TO BENEFIT US AS WELL. WHAT DO YOU WHAT DO YOU GUYS EXPECT THE TERMS TO BE ON THIS? THE LAST TRUCK WE DID WAS SIX YEARS. SO YOU ALL HAVE IT DONE IN SIX.

WHAT DOES THAT LEAVE YOU OUT OF THE SD FUNDING EVERY YEAR ROUGHLY.

I DON'T KNOW THOSE NUMBERS. I DON'T HAVE THOSE NUMBERS RIGHT NOW. I DON'T KNOW THOSE NUMBERS OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.

I MEAN, IT'S ENOUGH TO COVER IT WITH MONEY LEFT OVER, RIGHT? YEAH. SO SO WHAT THEY DID IS THEY, THEY BASICALLY PUT THE LOAN AMOUNT, THE, THE EXTRA LOAN AMOUNT IN OUR LAST CONTRACT.

SO IT'S NOT GOING TO COME OUT OF OUR. SO OUR LOAN IS GOING TO ACTUALLY RAISE $80,000, 70 SOMETHING THOUSAND.

SO IT'S GOING TO COVER IT. AND THEN YOU'LL STILL GET THE NORMAL. OKAY.

YEAH, WE'VE DONE THIS BEFORE. THIS IS THE SECOND TIME WE'VE DONE THIS.

SEE Y'ALL. Y'ALL ALREADY GOT IT COVERED. THEN I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE ON THE SSD THAT, YOU KNOW, WITH THE GROWTH YOU'RE SEEING IN CERTAIN AREAS, ARE YOU SEEING THE SSD SHRINKING OR THE SSD STAYS THE SAME? YOUR COVERAGE AREA OR COVERAGE AREA OR COVERAGE AREA IS GROWING.

IT'S GROWING. OH BY FAR. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE DON'T IT'S A TWO YEAR COMMITMENT TO GET THE TRUCK.

AND THEN ALL THE GROWTH HAPPENS AND THEY START MOVING SOME MORE ASSETS FROM THE NORTHERN PART OF THE COUNTY DOWN TO THAT SSD.

AND THEN WE'RE STUCK WITH A TRUCK AND WE'VE WE'VE GOT A CONTRACT.

YEAH. AND IT'S IN THE PAYMENT. THE AGREEMENTS ARE IN THE CONTRACT.

I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE $582,000 AS A DOWN PAYMENT FOR THE CUSTOM SABER FOR TINKER.

SECOND. CAN YOU AMEND YOUR MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT REMAINING OF THE TINKER? WITH THE REMAINING BALANCE TO BE FUNDED THROUGH EST FUNDING.

[00:50:02]

SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION BY MAYOR PRO TEM TOWNSEND.

SECOND BY COUNCIL SARTIN. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS CALL FOR THE VOTE? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

ALRIGHT, LET'S TALK ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I APPRECIATE THOSE LEGWORK ON THAT, BY THE WAY.

YEAH. APPRECIATE THAT. ABSOLUTELY. NUMBER EIGHT DISCUSSION.

[8. Discussion and possible action to use the 2026 Angleton Fire Department Bond to replace the emergency generator at Station 1. ]

POSSIBLE ACTION TO USE THE 2026 ANGLETON FIRE DEPARTMENT BOND TO REPLACE THE EMERGENCY GENERATOR AT STATION ONE.

YES, SIR. WE DO HAVE SOME FUNDS. IT'S ACTUALLY 22 BOND.

CORRECT ME ON THAT. AND WE WOULD LIKE TO REPLACE THE GENERATOR THERE.

THE GENERATOR THERE IS IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN, 20 YEARS OLD.

IT'S A DIESEL ENGINE. LIKE WE MENTIONED EARLIER, IT IS 100KW, BUT IT'S INSIDE OUR BUILDING.

WE'D LIKE TO CONVERT IT TO GAS. THAT WAY IT'S CONTINUOUSLY RUN IF WE EVER NEED IT.

AND IT WOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE. AND I SEE THE BUDGET AMOUNT IS 500,000.

SO WE STILL HAVE THE FULL ALLOTTED AMOUNT. WE HAVE NOT TAPPED INTO THAT YET.

ON THAT WE HAVE. OKAY. SO WHERE, WHERE ARE WE ON? WHAT IS THE ACTUAL OUR REMAINING BALANCE BALANCE IS ABOUT 135 OKAY, 135 SO THIS WON'T EAT UP ALL THE BALANCE THEN.

NO, SIR. OKAY. THIS WILL GIVE US PROBABLY ABOUT 95 ROUGHLY.

AND YOU'LL HAVE IDEAS ON HOW YOU MIGHT WANT TO. SPEND THAT LAST 95,000.

WE NEED TO DISCUSS ABOUT THAT. OKAY. THAT'S FINE.

JUST ONE STEP AT A TIME. YES. ALL RIGHT. WELL, WE DID TELL THEM TO COME BACK TO US WITH A BETTER PLAN ON THE ON THAT GENERATOR. SO THIS IS THE RIGHT PLAN? WELL, WHAT'S YOUR WARRANTY PERIOD? FIVE YEARS.

FIVE YEAR WARRANTY. DID YOU GET A SERVICE CONTRACT OR MAINTENANCE CONTRACT FOR THIS AFTERWARDS? I DON'T HAVE THAT ANSWER AT THE MOMENT. IT IS IN THE QUOTE.

OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 2026 BOND FUNDS MOVE TO PURCHASE THIS NEW GENERATOR FOR OUR MD.

IT'S NOT ME DOWN HERE AT THE BOTTOM. I'LL MAKE IT.

I'LL SECOND THE MOTION. I WASN'T SURE I HAVE A MOTION BY COUNCILMAN.

SARTIN. BY MAYOR PRO TEM. TOWNSEND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? I'M JUST. I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT WE'RE KEEPING IT UP AND RUNNING.

THESE STORMS HIT AND WE LOSE POWER. IT'S NICE TO KNOW THAT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS POWER. THERE ARE CERTAIN CRITICAL STATIONS IN THE CITY THAT HAVE GOT TO KEEP MOVING.

ANOTHER ONE OF THEM, FOR SURE. WELL, AND YOU KNOW, THE ONE THING I KEEP SAYING IS I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS STANDING WITH US.

I MEAN, WE WE PROMISED ONCE WE GOT THE EVERYTHING IN ORDER WITH BUDGETING AND ALL THAT, THAT, THAT WE WOULD TAKE CARE OF, OF YOU KNOW, FIRST RESPONDERS AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.

MAYBE NOT AS QUICKLY AS, AS WE WOULD HOPE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO GET THERE.

THAT AREA LOOKS REALLY GOOD SO FAR. I SAW THAT THE OTHER DAY WITH.

OUR FIREFIGHTERS ARE HAPPY. THEY'RE EXCITED. A LOT BETTER THAN I USED TO GO INTO THAT PLACE.

I HAVE A MOTION A SECOND. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS AND CALL FOR THE VOTE? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE. AYE.

ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU CHIEF. THANK YOU. MAYOR. THANK YOU. COUNCIL. THANK YOU. CHIEF. NUMBER NINE, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON A RESOLUTION NUMBER 202604140-009.

[9. Discussion and possible action on Resolution No. 20260414-009 establishing an agreement between the City of Angleton, Texas and Angleton RV Park LLC, located at 789 and 799 Anchor Road/County Road 44, Brazoria County, Texas, for the granting of water and sewer utility services and providing an effective date. ]

ESTABLISHING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANGLETON AND ANGLETON RV PARK, LLC, LOCATED AT 789 AND 799 ANCHOR ROAD, COUNTY ROAD 44, BRAZORIA COUNTY, TEXAS FOR THE GRANTING OF WATER AND SEWER UTILITY SERVICES AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS ITEM, AS YOU RECALL, CAME BEFORE YOU WITH PETITION FOR ANNEXATION.

WE HAD DISCUSSIONS AND THERE WERE DIFFERENT, I THINK, POSITIONS OF THE COUNCIL AS TO WHERE YOU WANTED TO SEE THIS ITEM GO.

SINCE THAT TIME, MR. HAS WITHDRAWN THAT APPLICATION OR PETITION FOR ANNEXATION INTO THE CITY LIMITS WITH THE REQUEST TO CONNECT TO WATER AND SEWER SERVICES. I HAVE ATTACHED THE ESTIMATIONS ON THE CURRENT RATES OF WHICH HE WOULD HAVE TO, OF COURSE, CONNECT WITH THOSE FEES IN MIND.

SO THE REQUEST WAS OF COURSE DRAFTED AS A RESOLUTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT TO DO SO AT THE COST OF THE DEVELOPER.

[00:55:08]

LEGAL HAS ASSISTED US WITH THE DRAFTING OF THE RESOLUTION, WHICH WOULD PROVIDE PROTECTIONS JUST IN CASE IN THE FUTURE.

THEY DECIDED TO BE RELEASED FROM THE ETA OF SOMETHING OF THAT NATURE.

THE RESOLUTION WOULD OUTLINE THE PROCESS FOR US.

OF COURSE, BASICALLY ENDING THE AGREEMENT OF THE SERVICES.

SO THE RESOLUTION IS UP FOR CONSIDERATION. HE IS AVAILABLE TO SPEAK TO COUNCIL AND CONTINUE THAT DISCUSSION.

OTHER THAN THAT, THAT'S ALL THAT I HAVE AND WE'LL BE BACK. THANK YOU.

WELCOME BACK. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL MEMBERS. I DO WANT TO ASK YOU A QUICK QUESTION.

ARE YOU AWARE OF THE RATES THAT WILL BE CHARGED TO YOU? YES. I UNDERSTAND IT'S A 2,025% PREMIUM. I'LL MAKE SURE THAT WAS DISCUSSED WITH YOU.

AND WE DO HAVE THAT PROTECTION NOTICE IN THERE ABOUT FILING TO GET OUT OF AN ETJ.

YEAH, WE HAVE A PHRASE IN THERE THAT I DRAFTED.

AND OF COURSE, SCOTT CORRECTED ME AND PUT IT PROPERLY HOW WE CAN ACTUALLY DO IT BY LEGAL MEANS.

SO I THINK THERE'S ENOUGH TEETH IN THAT CLAUSE THAT YOU SEE IN THE SECTIONS TOWARD THE END.

OKAY. COUNCIL WHAT'S YOUR THOUGHTS? IS YOUR REFERENCE.

GLOBAL HOURS.

REAL QUICK. HECTOR. DID WE REVIEW THIS FOR ESTABLISHING THAT THE QUANTITY THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE PROVIDING IS ADEQUATE FOR US TO PROVIDE LIKE TOTAL AMOUNT OF WATER? YES. WE CAN PROVIDE THAT AMOUNT OF WATER. WHAT WE'RE OUT OF ESSENTIALLY IS CONNECTIONS, BUT THIS IS ONE CONNECTION TO A PROPERTY.

OH. WOULD YOU LOOK AT THAT? I NEED TO GO BACK TO VERIFY.

WE DO HAVE ENOUGH CONNECTIONS FOR THAT. THERE'S A CHART IN.

THE PERCENTAGE OF TRAILER HOUSES FOR TRADING HOUSES.

I CAN VERIFY THAT. HOW DO YOU VERIFY THAT? WE DID AN EQUIVALENCY ESTIMATE. OKAY, SO WE'VE ALREADY DONE THAT. YES.

FOR RENOVATIONS. COUNCIL. ANY THOUGHTS? ACTIONS.

SO IF IN THE FUTURE HE DECIDES TO RELEASE HIMSELF FROM THE ETJ AND SERVICES ARE NO LONGER PROVIDED, WHO'S IN CHARGE OF THE LIFT STATION? IT'S NOT GOING TO BE ON THAT PROPERTY. WE HAVE A LIFT STATION IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. THAT'S THAT'S CITY PROPERTY. NOW, IF IF THE PROPERTY OWNER, FOR INSTANCE, IF THERE'S NOT ENOUGH FALL FOR THEM TO MAKE IT TO THAT LIFT STATION, WHICH I SERIOUSLY DOUBT BECAUSE THAT LIFT STATION IS VERY DEEP.

BUT IF THAT WERE THE CASE, THEN IT WOULD STILL BE OWNED BY WHOEVER OWNS THAT PROPERTY.

IT'S PART OF THE PROPERTY. IF THEY WERE TO BUILD A LIFT STATION ON THAT PROPERTY.

BUT THE LIFT STATION BEHIND THERE, CLOSER TO LOWE'S IS THE CITY OF ANGLETON LIFT STATION.

CORRECT? THE STATION IS THE CITY OF ANGLETON LIFT STATION.

WE GOT A MANHOLE THERE THAT'S VERY DEEP. IT WOULD NOT BE RUDE TO PUT IN A LIFT STATION ANYWAYS BECAUSE HE CAN GRAB HIS ELECTRIC BILLS.

IT'S A LOT BETTER WHERE HE CAN TIE INTO THAT MANHOLE.

AND THAT MANHOLE IS RIGHT THERE TO WHERE HE CAN EASILY ACCESS IT.

IF HE DOES LEAVE THE ETJ HIS OPTIONS ARE GOING TO BE VERY FEW BECAUSE I'D BE WILLING TO ALMOST SURE I HADN'T SEEN ANY

[01:00:07]

PLANS, BUT THAT THAT SEPTIC FIELD THAT HE WILL HAVE TO HAVE WILL BE DEVELOPED AND BE GONE.

SO. THERE'S. THERE'S NO WAY FOR HIM TO. IT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT FOR HIM TO DO THAT.

JOHN, WHILE YOU'RE UP. THAT AREA IS UNDER THE TAXI AREA.

CAPACITY. IMPACT FEE? YES, SIR. IT'S GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO PAY THAT.

YES. FOR THOSE SERVICE CONNECTIONS. YES. OKAY.

CHECK THAT. ANYTHING GOING INTO THAT LIFT STATION? THAT'S RIGHT. IS IT GOING TO HAVE TO PAY AN IMPACT FEE? YOU UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT FEE? NO. THERE'S AN IMPACT FEE ZONE ON THAT PROPERTY IN THAT AREA WHERE YOU TIE INTO THE SERVICE UNIT COUNTS THAT THE EQUIVALENCY THAT YOU HAVE ALREADY DONE THAT, THAT THERE'S ALREADY AN AMOUNT PER EQUIVALENT SERVICE UNIT FOR THAT.

YOU JUST MULTIPLY THAT THIRD AND THAT IS HIS IMPACT FEE.

OTIS, DID YOU DISCUSS THAT WITH HIM? WE DID NOT.

WE NEED TO TABLE THIS ITEM. BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE THE DETAILS ATTACHED.

OKAY. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A SETUP. BASICALLY, CORRECT.

THAT'S ESSENTIALLY WHAT IT IS. I'LL BE I'LL BE OKAY WITH THE IMPACT.

I DON'T THINK IT'S A NEGOTIATION ITEM UNLESS IT IS.

BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE I DON'T WANT TO SPEAK FOR YOU, BUT I MEAN, I WOULD MAKE SURE YOU UNDERSTOOD THAT BEFORE WE'D PAY IT ANYWAY, WHETHER IT'S INSIDE THE CITY OR OUT. THAT'S CORRECT.

YES. BECAUSE YOU'RE ATTACHED. YOU'RE ANYBODY WHO GOES INTO SERVICE, THAT AREA IS SUBJECT TO IT.

IT DOESN'T MATTER. IS THERE AN UNDERSTANDING? I UNDERSTAND.

I EXPECTED A SOME KIND OF SERVICE FEE CHARGE.

SO I DON'T KNOW THE NUMBER, BUT I EXPECT ESSENTIALLY YOU'RE JOINING IN THE SERVICES ALREADY PROVIDED AND PAID FOR AND YOUR HELP OFFSET THAT EXPENSE.

SO.

I STILL HAVE HESITATIONS OF GIVING CITY SERVICES TO AN ANNEXED PROPERTY.

MAKES SENSE. LONG HISTORY OF IT. I MEAN, THE PROPERTY THAT HE HAS THE SEWER FIELD ON IS CITY OF ANGLETON.

POLICY CALL FOR THIS. IT'S A POLICY CALL FOR THE CITY.

IF YOU WANT TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO NONRESIDENTS.

I MEAN I SEE BOTH SIDES OF THAT, BUT WE HAVEN'T ESTABLISHED RATE FOR OUTSIDE THE CITY FOR A REASON BECAUSE WE DO IT.

I'M NOT SAYING THAT WE SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT IN THIS CASE, BUT WE HAVE SET POLICY FOR SO LONG IN THE CITY OF PROVIDING SERVICES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY AT A HIGHER RATE. FOR CASES LIKE THIS, I ALSO UNDERSTAND THE REASON AGAINST IT.

SO IT'S REALLY UP TO THE COUNCIL TO MAKE THAT DECISION. WHAT YOU WANT TO DO.

ONE THING IS WE NEED RIGHT NOW WE NEED MORE WATER USERS.

BACK THERE SHAKING HIS HEAD AND I'M SURE SUSIE WAS SITTING IN THE FRONT ROW, SHE WOULD BE SHAKING HER HEAD.

WE WILL HAVE MORE WATER COMING ONLINE SOON. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO AUTHORIZE CONNECTION TO THE CITY WATER, SEWER, SEWER SERVICES FOR. OH, GOSH. LET'S SEE.

THE PROPERTY AT 799 COUNTY ROAD 44. SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL BY

[01:05:03]

COUNCILMAN SARTIN. SECOND BY COUNCILMAN SMITH.

MAYBE. MAYBE. I JUST WANT TO ASK ONE QUICK QUESTION.

GO AHEAD. SO WE TALKED ABOUT TRYING TO EXIT THE ETJ.

WHAT IF THEY JUST SELL THE PROPERTY OUTRIGHT? DOES IT STAY WITH THE PROPERTY? OKAY. YES.

AND YOU'RE NOT PLANNING, ARE YOU PLANNING TO EXPAND THE PROPERTY? NO, NOT AT THIS TIME. PLEASE REMEMBER. PLEASE REMEMBER ONCE HE'S TIED IN. RIGHT. AND IF HE DOES COME OUT, HE'LL HAVE TO REESTABLISH HIS FIELD, YOU KNOW, OUT THERE.

SO IT WOULD BE VERY HARD FOR HIM ON A LIMITED PROPERTY TO REESTABLISH THAT.

SO IT WOULD BEHOOVE HIM TO STAY WITH CITY SERVICES AT THAT POINT BECAUSE HE CAN'T GO BACK TO HIS WATER WELL AND STILL HAVE SANITARY BACK IN WHICH HE'S ALWAYS WANTED. HE HAS TO HAVE BOTH AS PART OF THE AGREEMENT.

THANK YOU. WE CAN HAVE NO RESTRICTIONS PUT ON WHEN HE EXPANDS AND TAKES UP MORE OF OUR AVAILABLE TAPS.

HOW MANY MORE CAN YOU EXPAND TO? ARE WE PATENT 20? JUST NOT. NOT AN EQUIVALENT OF HOMES. IT'S QUITE LOW VOLUME.

WE'LL GET TO THE TOTAL COUNT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE IMPACT FEES AND JUST THE AMOUNT OF AVAILABLE SERVICE CONNECTIONS.

HE EXPANDS THE IMPACT FEES COME IN TOO, RIGHT? EVERY TIME WE EXPAND. THAT'S IN THE CONTRACT.

AND THAT'S UNDERSTOOD. NOT IN THE CONTRACT. IT'S THE STATUTE.

LOCAL ORDINANCE. YOU UNDERSTAND THAT? IF HE DOES EXPAND IT, WE'LL HAVE TO UPDATE HIS PLAN ON HOW MANY PHONE NUMBERS HE HAS OUT THERE.

CORRECT. REPORT TO THE CITY. REPORT TO THE CITY AT LEAST.

THEY'RE NOT SEPARATE. YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE TO REPLY TO THIS ONE, BUT IT'S NOT SEPARATE TAPS FOR EACH RV.

IT'S ONE TURBINE. CORRECT. YEAH, IT'S ONE MASTER METER.

WE'RE GOING TO CALCULATE THE IMPACT FEES BASED ON ACCOUNTS.

SO HE COMES BACK AND SAYS DON'T ADD ANY MORE.

WE'LL GET THAT 20 MORE ACCOUNTS INTO THE. YES SIR.

I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON THE FLOOR. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS ITEM? NOT ON THE CALL FOR THE VOTE. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE.

AYE. ALL THOSE OPPOSED? SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. COUNCILMAN. THANK YOU. TEAM.

YES, SIR. NUMBER TEN, DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 20260414-010.

[10. Discussion and possible action on Resolution No. 20260414-010 approving a Reimbursement Agreement relating to the Austin Colony Public Improvement District (PID). ]

APPROVING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE AUSTIN COLONY PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT.

OTIS THANK YOU. MAYOR AND COUNCIL. THIS IS CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NOTED TO CONSIDER THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR AUSTIN COLONY.

AS YOU KNOW, MR. RAY, WHO IS HERE HAS BEGUN CONSTRUCTION.

SECTION ONE IS PREPARED FOR THE MOST PART IN TERMS OF THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.

THE PIT IS CURRENTLY BEING PROCESSED THROUGH OUR THIRD PARTY CONSULTING COMPANY, P3.

OUR FINANCIAL ADVISORS HAVE BEEN REVIEWING THIS, AND WE DO MEET ON A BI WEEKLY BASIS WITH THE PIT CALL REGARDING ALL OF THESE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS. SO WHERE WE ARE NOW ONCE THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT IS PASSED BY RESOLUTION, WE WILL COME IN THE FUTURE STEPS IN TERMS OF THE ACTUAL PRELIMINARY S P, WHICH IS THE ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY.

THAT WOULD BE A PUBLIC HEARING THAT WILL BE SET.

SO THERE ARE A FEW MEETINGS THAT WILL HAPPEN THEREAFTER.

MR. RAY HAS REQUESTED THAT THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BE SET ASIDE AND APPROVED.

AT THIS TIME WHILE WE WAIT ON A FEW CHECK POINTS AT THE THE AG'S OFFICE REGARDING HIS SETUP.

ONCE WE COME BACK TO CONSOLE WITH THOSE PUBLIC HEARINGS.

[01:10:04]