[DECLARATION OF A QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER]
[1. Discussion and possible action on the minutes for the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting held on September 3, 2026.]
[00:00:10]
OUR 1ST ITEM IS DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON THE MINUTES FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 3RD, 2026. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? IF NOT, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.SO MOVED. SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER HESTON AND A SECOND FROM COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.
[2. Conduct a public hearing, discussion, and take possible action on a Variance request of the Angleton LDC, Land Development Code Section 23-5, E.3/Sec. 28-46.- SF-6.3 Single Family Residential, Subsection d.1(b)., for insufficient lot frontage (49 ft.), for an infill lot approval on property located within the SF 6.3 Residential District, at 0 E. Peach St., approximately 200 ft. east of E. Peach St. & S. Arcola St., Angleton, Texas (Brazoria C.A.D., Prop. ID #715814)/(ANGLETON) BLK 67 LOT 5-5A.]
DEVELOPMENT CODE, SECTION 23-5E3. SECTION 28-46.SINGLE FAMILY 6.3. RESIDENTIAL SUBSECTION D ONE FOR INSUFFICIENT LOT FRONTAGE 49FT FOR AN INFILL LOT APPROVAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT. 6.3 RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT 0 EAST PEACH STREET, APPROXIMATELY 200FT EAST OF EACH.
EAST PEACH STREET AND SOUTH ARCOLA STREET ANGLETON.
TEXAS. BRAZORIA COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PROPERTY ID 715814.
ANGLETON BLOCK 67, LOT FIVE 5.A. MR. SPRIGGS, WOULD YOU INTRODUCE THIS ITEM, PLEASE? THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. THIS IS AS STATED, IT'S A PUBLIC HEARING, A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE OF A LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENT WITHIN THE 6.3 DISTRICT.
THIS AREA IS IN THE OLDER PART OF TOWN IS CONSIDERED A LOT OF RECORD.
THERE ARE 2 SMALL LOTS THAT MAKE UP THE 49FT THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH TODAY.
SO IT'S JUST SHY OF THE REQUIRED FRONTAGE AS YOU SEE HERE OF 60FT IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA.
WE FIND THAT THIS WOULD BE WITHIN THE SPIRIT AND INTENT OF WHAT WE TRY TO PROMOTE.
IF YOU GO TO THE GRAPHIC, IT WILL SHOW BASICALLY THAT THE HOME TO BE PLACED ON.
THE LOT WILL FIT WITHIN THE SETBACKS THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR 6.3.
THIS WOULD BE A MINOR PLAT IN WHICH WE WOULD PROCESS ADMINISTRATIVELY THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT.
SO WE FIND THAT THERE'S NO ADVERSE IMPACT ON THE GENERAL AREA.
THIS WOULD ONLY ADD TO THE VALUATION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND APPEARANCE AS WELL.
ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
SO MOVED. I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BIERI.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR INDICATE BY SAYING I. I. OKAY.
YOU DO NOT HAVE TO. OKAY, COME TO THE MICROPHONE AND INTRODUCE YOURSELF, PLEASE.
AND GOOD MORNING EVERYONE. MY NAME IS JASMINE ACERO AND I RESIDE IN PEARLAND, TEXAS, AND I AM RESPECTFULLY REQUESTING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW ME TO BUILD A SINGLE FAMILY HOME IN THIS LESS THAN REQUIRED 60 FOOT PIECE OF PROPERTY.
MY BOYFRIEND LIVES IN FREEPORT, TEXAS, AND AS WE PLAN OUR FUTURE TOGETHER, WE HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR A LOCATION THAT WOULD ALLOW US TO BUILD OUR HOME WHILE REMAINING REASONABLY CLOSE TO BOTH OF OUR FAMILIES. ANGLETON IS AN IDEAL LOCATION, AND WE HAVE REALLY BECOME FOND OF THIS REALLY NICE AREA. SO I UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY'S ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS EXIST FOR IMPORTANT REASONS.
SO THAT'S WHY WE ARE RESPECTFULLY ASKING THE BOARD TO CONSIDER WHETHER THIS PARTICULAR LOT CAN REASONABLY SUPPORT A WELL DESIGNED SINGLE FAMILY HOME WITHIN THIS 10 FOOT VARIANCE THAT IT HAS, WE DON'T BELIEVE IT WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
AND WE INTEND TO MAKE A SIGNIFICANT PERSONAL INVESTMENT IN THIS PROPERTY.
IN THE CITY OF ANGLETON, WE PLAN TO BUILD A QUALITY HOME AND MAINTAIN IT.
AND THIS WOULD NOT BE A TEMPORARY PROJECT OR SOMETHING THAT WE INTEND TO INVEST AND SELL OFF, BUT TO LIVE THERE FOR THE REST OF OUR FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
AND FOR THESE REASONS, WE PRESENT TODAY AND RESPECTFULLY ASK FOR YOU TO GRANT THE VARIANCE.
THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE LIKE TO SPEAK? GOING ONCE. GOING TWICE. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION FROM COMMISSIONER BIERI AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE SO BY SAYING AYE.
AYE OPPOSED SAME SIGN. OKAY. STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THIS TO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS.
HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS? I HAVE A MOTION.
[00:05:02]
I'LL TAKE A MOTION. I MOVE TO APPROVE THE 49 FOOT WIDE LOT FRONTAGE VARIANCE AS REQUESTED.I HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER TOWNSEND AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BIERI.
IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION? IF NOT, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION INDICATE BY SAYING AYE.
AYE. OPPOSED. SAME SIGN. MOTION CARRIES IT. CONGRATULATIONS.
GOOD LUCK TO YOU. I ASSUME THIS WILL HAVE TO GO TO CITY COUNCIL FOR THEIR APPROVAL AS WELL.
ON THE 20TH. AND SHE'S AWARE OF THE DATE. OKAY.
LAST ITEM I UNDERSTAND HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN. LAST ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
THE MEETING ON 8TH IS NOT GOING TO BE THE 8TH.
WE'RE LOOKING AT THE 19TH, SO I'LL SEND YOU ANOTHER POLL.
OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH. AND WITH THAT, WE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.